Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilatory Support Research Articles

Respiratory outcomes after 12 weeks in patients recovered from COVID-19 managed with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation

Aim: To assess the respiratory outcomes twelve weeks after the management with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in patients recovered from severe corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methodology: The cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in the Department of Pulmonology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Lahore between October 2020 and March 2021. Total 124 patients visiting the hospital twelve weeks after recovery from COVID-19 were enrolled using convenience sampling. After excluding patients with a history of previous respiratory symptoms before the development of COVID-19, data from 87 patients who required oxygen >15 L/minute and NIPPV support were subjected to final analysis. Results: The proportion of middle-aged adults was 52.9%, males 64.4% and smokers 49.4%. Twelve weeks after treatment with NIPPV, O2 saturation <97.0% at rest was found in 97.7% patients, PR >100 at rest in 16.1% patients, severe dyspnea in 65.5% patients, O2 dependency >5 L/min in 2.3% patients, severe CXR abnormalities in 20.7% patients and lung fibrosis in 27.6% patients. The distribution of SpO2, PR, and dyspnea status twelve weeks after recovery from severe COVID-19 were not significantly different between NIPPV duration groups (p-value >0.05). However, the number of patients with O2 dependency, severe CXR abnormality, and lung fibrosis were significantly different between NIPPV duration groups (all p-values <0.05). Conclusion: Oxygen desaturation, severe dyspnea and severe CXR abnormalities twelve weeks after the treatment with NIPPV were common among patients recovered from COVID-19. Severe CXR abnormality, lung fibrosis, and O2 dependency were significantly associated with prolonged duration of NIPPV. Keywords: COVID-19, Dyspnea, Pulmonary fibrosis, SARS-CoV-2, NIPPV.

Perioperative Pulmonary Atelectasis: Part II. Clinical Implications.

The development of pulmonary atelectasis is common in the surgical patient. Pulmonary atelectasis can cause various degrees of gas exchange and respiratory mechanics impairment during and after surgery. In its most serious presentations, lung collapse could contribute to postoperative respiratory insufficiency, pneumonia, and worse overall clinical outcomes. A specific risk assessment is critical to allow clinicians to optimally choose the anesthetic technique, prepare appropriate monitoring, adapt the perioperative plan, and ensure the patient's safety. Bedside diagnosis and management have benefited from recent imaging advancements such as lung ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography, and monitoring such as esophageal manometry. Therapeutic management includes a broad range of interventions aimed at promoting lung recruitment. During general anesthesia, these strategies have consistently demonstrated their effectiveness in improving intraoperative oxygenation and respiratory compliance. Yet these same intraoperative strategies may fail to affect additional postoperative pulmonary outcomes. Specific attention to the postoperative period may be key for such outcome impact of lung expansion. Interventions such as noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support may be beneficial in specific patients at high risk for pulmonary atelectasis (e.g., obese) or those with clinical presentations consistent with lung collapse (e.g., postoperative hypoxemia after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgeries). Preoperative interventions may open new opportunities to minimize perioperative lung collapse and prevent pulmonary complications. Knowledge of pathophysiologic mechanisms of atelectasis and their consequences in the healthy and diseased lung should provide the basis for current practice and help to stratify and match the intensity of selected interventions to clinical conditions.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilatory Support: "Nasal Noninvasive Ventilation" or "Noninvasive Ventilatory Support"?

Many studies suggest a brief statistical benefit on survival and quality of life by using nasal noninvasive ventilation for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neuromuscular conditions. Indeed, nasal noninvasive ventilation has become synonymous with continuous positive airway pressure and lo-span bilevel positive airway pressure. Nasal noninvasive ventilation, however, may not normalize CO2 levels and continuous positive airway pressure and O2 exacerbate hypercapnia and often lead to CO2 narcosis, intubation, and ultimately tracheostomy or palliative care death. However, a third option can be to offer up to continuous noninvasive ventilatory support and extubation to it. Noninvasive ventilatory support can be effective for full, definitive ventilatory support, even for people with no measurable vital capacity, and has maintained classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients for up to 12 yrs without resort to tracheotomies. Nineteen centers have reported 335 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients using continuous noninvasive ventilatory support instead of tracheostomy mechanical ventilation for an average of 14 mos (6 mos to 14 yrs). The noninvasive ventilatory support must also be used in conjunction with mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to clear airway debris and normalize or renormalize ambient air oxyhemoglobin saturation, both to avoid intubation and to facilitate extubation. People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis satisfying specific criteria, even when continuously dependent on tracheostomy mechanical ventilation, can be decannulated and placed on continuous noninvasive ventilatory support with mechanical insufflation-exsufflation.

The ventilatory effect of high velocity nasal insufflation compared to non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation in the treatment of hypercapneic respiratory failure: A subgroup analysis

PurposeOxygen delivery by high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is effective in providing respiratory support. HFNC has utility in clearing the extra-thoracic dead space, making it potentially beneficial in the treatment of hypercapnic respiratory failure. This study compares high velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI), a form of HFNC, to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in their abilities to provide ventilatory support for patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure. MethodsThis is a pre-defined subgroup analysis from a larger randomized clinical trial of Emergency Department (ED) patients with respiratory failure requiring NIPPV support. Patients were randomized to HVNI or NIPPV. Subgroup selection was done for patients with discharge diagnoses of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The primary outcomes were change in pCO2 and pH over time. Secondary outcomes were treatment failure and intubation rate. Results65 patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure were compared. 34 were randomized to HVNI and 31 to NIPPV. The therapeutic impact on PCO2 and pH over time was similar in each group. The intubation rate was 5.9% in the HVNI group and 16.1% in the NIPPV group (p = 0.244). The rate of treatment failure was 23.5% in the HVNI group and 25.8% in the NIPPV group (p = 1.0). ConclusionHVNI may provide ventilatory support similar to NIPPV in patients presenting with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, but further study is needed to corroborate these findings.

HVNI vs NIPPV in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: Subgroup analysis of a multi-center trial in the ED

Background and objectiveManaging respiratory failure (RF) secondary to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been shown to significantly improve morbidity and mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). This subgroup analysis compares high-velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI), a form of high-flow nasal cannula, with NIPPV in the treatment of RF secondary to ADHF with respect to therapy failure, as indicated by the requirement for intubation or all-cause arm failure including subjective crossover to the alternate therapy. MethodsThe subgroup analysis is from a larger randomized control trial of adults presenting to the ED with RF requiring NIPPV support. Patients were randomly selected to therapy, and subgroup selection was established a priori in the original study as a discharge diagnosis. The primary outcome was therapy failure at 72 h after enrolment. ResultsSubgroup analysis included a total of 22 HVNI and 20 NIPPV patients which fit discharge diagnosis ADHF. Baseline patient characteristics were not statistically significant. Primary outcomes were not statistically significant: intubation rate (p = 1.000), therapy success (p = 1.000). Repeated measures (vitals, dyspnea, blood gases) showed comparable differences over initial 4 h. Physicians scored HVNI superior on patient comfort/tolerance (p < 0.001), ease of use (p = 0.004), and monitoring (p = 0.036). Limitations were technical inability to blind the clinician team and lack of power of the subgroup analysis. ConclusionIn conclusion, this subgroup analysis suggests HVNI may be non-inferior to NIPPV in patients with respiratory failure secondary to ADHF that do not need emergent intubation.

Outcomes of unplanned extubation in ordinary ward are similar to those in intensive care unit: A STROBE-compliant case-control study.

Unplanned extubation (UE) may cause considerable adverse effects in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). Previous literature showed inconsistent prognosis in patients with UE. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical implications and outcomes of UE.The intubated adult patients with MV support in our hospital were enrolled, and they were divided into the UE and non-UE groups. Demographic data, admission unit, MV duration, overall weaning rate, and mortality rates were compared. The outcomes of UE in ordinary ward and intensive care unit (ICU) were also assessed.Totally 9245 intubated adult patients were included. UE occurred in 303 (3.5%) patients, and the UE events were 0.27 times/100 MV days. Old age, nonoperation related MV cause, and admission out of the ICU were significant factors associated with UE events. UE patients showed a trend of better overall weaning rate (71.9% vs 66.7%, P = .054) than non-UE. However, the in-hospital mortality rate (25.7% vs 24.8%, P = .713) were similar between the UE and non-UE patients. The reintubation rate of UE patients was 44.1% (142/322). Successful UEs were associated with patients in weaning process (52.8% vs 38.7%, P = .012), and patients received non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) support after UE (19.4% vs 3.5%, P < .001). Patients with successful UE had significantly shorter MV days, higher overall weaning rate, and lower mortality than those with unsuccessful UE. Outcomes of UE in ordinary ward and in ICU had similar MV duration, reintubation rate, overall weaning rate, and in-hospital mortality rate.The overall weaning rate and in-hospital mortality rates of the UE and non-UE patients were similar. UE occurred in ordinary ward had similar outcomes to those in ICU. Patients receiving MV should be assessed daily for weaning indications to reduce delayed extubation, and therefore, may decrease UE occurrence. Once the UE happened, NIPPV support may reduce the reintubation rate.

Radiographic and Respiratory Effects of Growing Rods in Children With Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Respiratory weakness and spinal deformity are common in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Posterior (distraction type) growing rods have recently gained favor as a treatment option in this population, due to their ability to prevent spinal deformity progression and their potential to allow lung volumes to increase over time. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of posterior growing rods on the spinal alignment and respiratory function in children with SMA with intermediate term follow-up. A single center, retrospective review was performed on SMA patients treated with growing rods, inserted between 2004 and 2010, with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. SMA type, changes in the route of bi-level positive airway pressure respiratory support and the amount of time receiving respiratory support are reported. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and radiographs were reviewed and data evaluated preinsertion, postinsertion, and at latest follow-up. Sixteen children with SMA (5 type I, 11 type II) met inclusion criteria. The average age of insertion was 5.8 (±1.5) years, the median number of lengthenings was 4 (range, 3 to 5), and the median time between insertion and last clinical review was 4.7 (range, 2.7 to 9.5) years. Radiographic review demonstrated significant (P<0.05) improvements in the following: Spinal curve magnitude, pelvic obliquity, space available for the lung, rib vertebral angle difference, and thoracic kyphosis following growing rod implantation. Thoracic and lumbar height and chest width and depth increased significantly (P<0.05) over the lengthening process. None of the patients initially required more than noninvasive positive pressure ventilation support. Fifteen of the 16 experienced no changes in their noninvasive positive pressure ventilation support needs throughout the study duration, requiring support only at night and naps. Serial PFTs were available for 6 children with SMA type II. PFTs demonstrated significant improvements in absolute forced vital capacity (FVC), minimal changes in the maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures, and a gradual worsening of percent predicted FVC. Clinical respiratory support requirements appear to stabilize following the insertion and lengthening of posterior based growing rods in the SMA population. Similar to previous studies, increased spinal height and thoracic cavity size were noted throughout the process. Despite an increasing absolute FVC, the percent predicted FVC diminished over time. Level IV-therapeutic.

Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilatory Support Begins During Sleep.

The goal of sleep doctors has been to titrate away apneas and hypopneas using noninvasive ventilation, a term that has become synonymous with continuous positive airway pressure and bilevel positive airway pressure at the lowest effective bilevel settings. It is now time to appreciate noninvasive ventilatory support as an alternative to invasive mechanical ventilation. This article discusses mechanisms of action, two paradigms, and ancillary techniques for noninvasive ventilatory support.

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation after extubation: features and outcomes in clinical practice.

ObjectiveTo describe postextubation noninvasive positive pressure ventilation use in intensive care unit clinical practice and to identify factors associated with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure.MethodsThis prospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit who required noninvasive positive pressure ventilation within 48 hours of extubation. The primary outcome was noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure.ResultsWe included 174 patients in the study. The overall noninvasive positive pressure ventilation use rate was 15%. Among the patients who used noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, 44% used it after extubation. The failure rate of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation was 34%. The overall mean ± SD age was 56 ± 18 years, and 55% of participants were male. Demographics; baseline pH, PaCO2 and HCO3; and type of equipment used were similar between groups. All of the noninvasive positive pressure ventilation final parameters were higher in the noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure group [inspiratory positive airway pressure: 15.0 versus 13.7cmH2O (p = 0.015), expiratory positive airway pressure: 10.0 versus 8.9cmH2O (p = 0.027), and FiO2: 41 versus 33% (p = 0.014)]. The mean intensive care unit length of stay was longer (24 versus 13 days), p < 0.001, and the intensive care unit mortality rate was higher (55 versus 10%), p < 0.001 in the noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure group. After fitting, the logistic regression model allowed us to state that patients with inspiratory positive airway pressure ≥ 13.5cmH2O on the last day of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation support are three times more likely to experience noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure compared with individuals with inspiratory positive airway pressure < 13.5 (OR = 3.02, 95%CI = 1.01 - 10.52, p value = 0.040).ConclusionThe noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure group had a longer intensive care unit length of stay and a higher mortality rate. Logistic regression analysis identified that patients with inspiratory positive airway pressure ≥ 13.5cmH2O on the last day of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation support are three times more likely to experience noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure.

Riluzole and Prognostic Factors in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Long-term and Short-term Survival: A Population-Based Study of 1149 Cases in Taiwan

BackgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare disease in Taiwan; thus, estimation of ALS mortality is difficult. We evaluated factors associated with ALS survival in Taiwan.MethodsThe study enrolled 1149 Taiwanese with a primary diagnosis of ALS during 1999–2008. Follow-up information was available for all patients; mean (SD) duration of follow-up was 2.91 (2.62) years. Medical interventions, including noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), tracheotomy, gastrostomy, and riluzole, were included in time-dependent survival analysis.ResultsOf the 1149 ALS patients, 438 (38.12%) died during follow-up. Mortality in the first year was 16%, which was 13 times (95% CI 11.1–15.2) the age- and sex-standardized rate of the general population in Taiwan. The average annual crude mortality rate was 13.1% (person-years). Factors significantly associated with increased mortality were male sex, advanced age, rural residence, lower economic status, no tracheotomy, and no riluzole treatment. Significant predictors of long-term versus average survival were younger age at diagnosis, being a dependent or receiving social welfare, and NIPPV support. Significant predictors of short-term versus average survival were older age, being employed, no tracheotomy, and no riluzole use.ConclusionsThe results support the use of riluzole to improve ALS survival. Patients who received riluzole and underwent tracheotomy had the best survival.

Efficacy of Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) combined with minitracheostomy in management of difficult to wean patients.

Background: To investigate the efficacy of NIPPV in combination with minitracheostomy as weaning adjunct in difficult to wean patients.Method: Prospective analysis of 10 non-consecutive patients with respiratory failure of various etiologies in 20 bedded adult multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care hospital. These patients were ventilator dependent and were difficult to extubate and wean off. They were subjected to NIPPV through facemask in combination with minitracheostomy using 4.5 mm percutaneous minitracheostomy tube (Minitrach II SIMS Portex, Hythe, Kent, UK) for removal of tracheobronchial secretions. Mortality, duration of treatment with NIPPV with minitracheostomy and duration of ICU stay were evaluated. Results: Mean age of the study group was 55± 20 years and M: F was 1:1. Average duration of intubation was 21.8 days. Minitracheostomy was performed after mean duration of 2.8 days of NIPPV support following extubation. Average period of NIPPV with in situ minitracheostomy tube was 8.2 days. 90% of the patients those underwent minitracheostomy could be discharged successfully from the ICU after a mean stay of 12.8 days following their last extubation.Conclusion: NIPPV in combination with minitracheostomy may be considered as safe and effective weaning adjunct to wean off difficult to wean patients.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/sljcc.v2i1.2951 Sri Lanka Journal of Critical Care Vol.2(1) 2011 16-19

Cheyne-Stokes-Atmung und kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Due to its high prevalence in patients with heart failure and its negative predictive value concerning morbidity and mortality, Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) is a sleep disorders of major interest. CSR correlates with the degree of heart failure and is characterised by a typical crescendo/decrescendo breathing pattern combined with phases of central sleep apnoea, caused by pulmonary oedema and oscillation of ventilatory control. Thus, CSR is a marker of the severity of heart failure. Treatment of CSR first involves optimisation of heart failure therapy by cardiologists and then application of non-invasive means of ventilatory support. Treatment of patients with severe heart failure with non-invasive positive pressure ventilatory support leads to a significant reduction of CSR, sympathetic activity, and daytime sleepiness and improves cardiac output and 6-minute walking distance. At present, a prospective randomised, controlled intervention-study (Serve-HF study) is being conducted in order to show if therapy of CSR can improve patient survival. This review describes the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic options of CSR with a special focus on the elevated cardiovascular risk of patients with CSR.

Prediction of Intubation after Bronchoscopy with Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Support in Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Background: Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) ensures adequate gas exchange during bronchoscopy in spontaneously breathing, hypoxemic patients, thus avoiding endotracheal intubation. However, in some patients, endotracheal intubation is eventually required after bronchoscopy. This study investigated the incidence of intubation and predictors of a need for emergency intubation prior to NPPV bronchoscopy initiation. Methods: On a retrospective basis, we reviewed the medical records of 36 patients (median age, 55 years; interquartile range [IQR], 43∼65 years) with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure who required NPPV during bronchoscopy between January 2005 and October 2007. Results: All patients were hypoxemic (median PaO2/FiO2 ratio 155; IQR 90∼190), but tolerated bronchoscopy with NPPV support. SOFA score and SAPS II score immediately before NPPV initiation were 4 (3∼7) and 36 (30∼42), respectively. Seventeen (47%) patients needed endotracheal intubation at a median time of 22 (2∼50) hours after bronchoscopy. Patients who needed intubation after bronchoscopy had a higher in-hospital mortality (11 [65%] vs. 4 [21%], p=0.017). Upon multiple logistic regression analysis, the need for intubation after bronchoscopy was independently associated with a P aO2/FiO2 ratio (OR, 0.961; 95% CI, 0.924∼0.999; p=0.047) immediately before NPPV initiation for bronchoscopy. Conclusion: The severity of the hypoxemia immediately prior to NPPV initiation for bronchoscopy was associated with the need for intubation after bronchoscopy in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Management of Postintubation Tracheobronchial Ruptures

To determine whether nonoperative management can be applied to iatrogenic postintubation tracheobronchial rupture (TBR). Prospective cohort study. Thirty consecutive patients with TBR complicating intubation between June 1993 and December 2005 entered the study. Patients not receiving mechanical ventilation at time of diagnosis were treated nonsurgically. Patients receiving mechanical ventilation who were judged operable underwent surgical repair, while nonoperable candidates had their TBR bridged by endotracheal tubes. Fifteen patients not requiring mechanical ventilation underwent simple conservative management. TBR length measured 3.85 +/- 1.46 cm (mean +/- SD). Eight TBRs showed full-thickness rupture with frank anterior intraluminal protrusion of the esophagus. In three patients, transient noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support (NIV) was necessary. All lesions healed without sequelae. Two patients receiving mechanical ventilation underwent surgical repair and died. Thirteen patients receiving mechanical ventilation were considered at high surgical risk, and TBR bridging was attempted as salvage therapy. Complete bridging was achieved in five patients by simply advancing the endotracheal tube distal to the injury. Separate bilateral mainstem endobronchial intubation was necessary in six patients whose TBRs were too close to the carina. Nine of 13 patients (69%) treated with nonoperative therapy completely recovered. We conclude that conservative nonoperative therapy should be considered in patients with postintubation TBR who are breathing spontaneously, or when extubation is scheduled within 24 h from the time of diagnosis, or when continued ventilation is required to treat an underlying respiratory status. Surgical repair should be reserved for cases in which NIV or bridging the lesion is technically not feasible.

Gastrectomy Performed with Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation for a Patient with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Report of a Case

We report the case of a patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for whom gastrectomy was successfully performed with the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). A 63-year-old man who had been suffering from chronic pulmonary emphysema for 12 years and receiving home oxygen therapy (HOT) for 9 years was diagnosed with gastric carcinoma. The patient required supplemental oxygen via nasal cannulae even at rest, and had labored breathing through pursed lips after a short conversation. The forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 400 ml. He underwent conventional gastrectomy under general anesthesia, and was extubated 90 min after surgery and given NPPV support. He was successfully weaned from NPPV on postoperative day (POD) 10 and discharged from our hospital on POD 28. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is useful for the perioperative management of patients with severe COPD and for extending the possibilities of surgery for patients on HOT.

NONINVASIVE POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY

Background: We have reported the results obtained by non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV)applied to the patients who had an open heart surgery and suffered from respiratory failure after extubation dueto various reasons.Materials and Methods: We applied NIPV support following severe respiratory deterioration in fifteen patients who underwent open heart surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass in our clinic between January 2000 and January 2001. Nine patients (60%) required NIPPV because of acute inflammation of underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Remaining six patients (40%) suffered from alveolar hypoventilation despite normal preoperative respiratoryfunction. Despite NIPPV support (avarage 2 to 4 hours), five patients required reentubation due to respiratoryfailure defined as persistandt hypoxia, hypercapnia and hemodynamic instability. However, respiratoryparameters improved significantly in 10 patients and reentubation was avoided.Results: Ten patients who did not require reentubation were supported by NIPPV for avarege of 8±5 hours(range 3-18 hours). One patient (6.66%) died as a result of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) followingaspiration pneumonia during the first week of postoperative period.Conclusion: NIPPV which is less invasive when compared to endotracheal entubation can be life saving.Timely application of NIPPV also prevents possible complications of endotracheal entubation in the patinetswho suffered from respiratory failure that did not require immediate entubation after open heart surgery.

Pneumothorax as a complication of bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation

Objectives: To describe the complication of pneumothorax in two paediatric patients receiving bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation for respiratory insufficiency. Design: Two patient case report. Setting: Tertiary pediatric ICU. Subjects: Two adolescents ages 12 and 16. Interventions: BiPAP ventilation for respiratory insufficiency and tube thoracostomy for pneumothorax. Measurements and main results: Both of our patients had a common underlying pathology of inflammatory lung disease and difficulty clearing airway secretions. Both patients displayed signs, symptoms, and radiographic findings consistent with pneumothorax after receiving BiPAP ventilation. The air leak resolved in our patients after chest tube placement without additional complications. Conclusion: The medical literature reports BiPAP to be an effective and safe mode of providing non-invasive positive pressure ventilatory support. In patients with acute inflammatory pulmonary processes and the inability to clear secretions, pneumothorax is a potential complication.

Effects of noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support in non-COPD patients with acute respiratory insufficiency after early extubation.

To investigate the effects of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) on pulmonary gas exchange, breathing pattern, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, oxygen consumption, and resting energy expenditure in patients with persistent acute respiratory failure but without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after early extubation. Prospective study. Multidisciplinary intensive care unit of a university hospital. 15 patients after prolonged mechanical ventilation (> 72 h) with acute respiratory insufficiency after early extubation. Criteria for early extubation were arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) > or = 40 mm Hg (fractional inspired oxygen 0.21), arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) < or = 55 mm Hg, pH > 7.32, respiratory rate < or = 40 breaths per min, tidal volume (VT) > or = 3 ml/kg, rapid shallow breathing index < or = 190 and negative inspiratory force > or = 20 cmH2O. After extubation, two modes of NPPV were applied [continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 5 cmH2O and pressure support ventilation (PSV) with 15 cmH2O pressure support]. Oxygenation and ventilatory parameters improved during both modes of NPPV (p < 0.05): increase in PaO2 of 11 mm Hg during CPAP and 21 mm Hg during PSV; decrease in intrapulmonary shunt fraction of 7% during CPAP and 12% during PSV; increase in tidal volume of 1 ml/kg during CPAP and 4 ml/kg during PSV; decrease in respiratory rate 6 breaths/min during CPAP and 9 breaths/min during PSV. Oxygen consumption (15% during CPAP, 22% during PSV) and resting energy expenditure (12% during CPAP, 20% during PSV) were reduced (p < 0.05). PaCO2 decreased, whereas minute ventilation and pH increased during PSV (p < 0.05). The median duration of NPPV was 2 days. Two patients had to be reintubated. In non-COPD patients with persistent acute respiratory failure after early extubation, NPPV improved pulmonary gas exchange and breathing pattern, decreased intrapulmonary shunt fraction, and reduced the work of breathing.

Reengineering Respiratory Support Following Extubation: Avoidance of Critical Care Unit Costs

We prospectively investigated alternative clinical practice strategies for critically ill trauma patients following extubation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these maneuvers. The primary change was elimination of the routine use of postextubation supplemental oxygen, with concurrent utilization of noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support (NPPV) to manage occurrences of postextubation hypoxemia. Prospective, consecutive accrual of patients undergoing extubation. Trauma ICU in a university hospital. All patients received mechanical ventilation using pressure support ventilation (PSV) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as the primary mode. The patients were extubated to room air following a 20-min preextubation trial of 5 cm H(2)O CPAP at FIO(2) of 0.21, and demonstrating a spontaneous respiratory rate </= 38 breaths/min, pH >/= 7.30, PaCO(2) </= 50 mm Hg, and PaO(2) >/= 50 mm Hg. The subgroup of patients who became hypoxemic (pulse oximetric saturation < 88%) within 24 h of extubation were treated with NPPV for up to 48 h duration. Patients who failed NPPV were reintubated. Four hundred fifty-one (84%) patients were successfully extubated to room air. Seventy-two patients (13%) became hypoxemic within 24 h, and NPPV was administered. Fifty-two patients (72% of those who were hypoxemic) responded to NPPV, while 20 patients failed to respond to therapy, were reintubated, and received mechanical ventilation for a mean of 4 days. Thirteen additional patients (2%) were reintubated for reasons other than hypoxemia. The overall reintubation rate for the group (n = 536) was 6.2%; for the postextubation hypoxemic group who failed NPPV, the reintubation rate was 3.7%. The elimination of routine supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula following extubation resulted in a potential direct cost avoidance of $50,006.88 for 451 patient days. Moreover, the 52 patients who were spared reintubation and mechanical ventilation provided an additional potential cost avoidance of $19,740.24 in unused ventilator days per patient. Eliminating the routine use of supplemental oxygen and employing NPPV as a method to prevent reintubation can facilitate a more aggressive, cost-effective strategy for the management of the trauma ICU patient who has been extubated.