non-Hispanic Persons Research Articles

Evaluating equity-promoting interventions to prevent race-based inequities in influenza outcomes.

Seasonal influenza hospitalizations pose a considerable burden in the United States, with BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color) communities being disproportionately affected. To determine and quantify the effects of different types of mitigation strategies on inequities in influenza outcomes (symptomatic infections and hospitalizations). In this simulation study, we fit a race-stratified agent-based model of influenza transmission to demographic and hospitalization data of the United States. We consider five racial-ethnic groups: non-Hispanic White persons, non- Hispanic Black persons, non-Hispanic Asian persons, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native persons, and Hispanic or Latino persons. We tested five idealized equity-promoting interventions to determine their effectiveness in reducing inequity in influenza outcomes. The interventions assumed (i) equalized vaccination rates, (ii) equalized comorbidities, (iii) work-risk distribution proportional to the distribution of the population, (iv) reduced work contacts for all, or (v) a combination of equalizing vaccination rates and comorbidities and reducing work contacts. Reduction in symptomatic or hospitalization risk ratios, defined as the ratio of the number of symptomatic infections (hospitalizations respectively) in each age- and racial-ethnic group and their corresponding white counterpart. We also evaluated the reduction in the absolute mean number of symptomatic infections or hospitalizations in each age- and racial-ethnic group compared to the fitted scenario (baseline). Our analysis suggests that symptomatic infections were equalized and reduced (by up to 17% in BIPOC adults aged 18-49) by strategies reducing work contacts or equalizing vaccination rates. Reducing comorbidities resulted in significant decreases in hospitalizations, with a reduction of over 40% in BIPOC groups. All tested interventions reduced the inequity in influenza hospitalizations in all racial-ethnic groups, but interventions reducing comorbidities in marginalized populations were the most effective. Notably, these interventions resulted in better outcomes across all racial-ethnic groups, not only those prioritized by the interventions. In this simulation modeling study, equalizing vaccination rates and reducing number of work contacts (which are relatively simple strategies to implement) reduced the both the inequity in hospitalizations and the absolute number of symptomatic infections and hospitalizations in all age and racial-ethnic groups.

Epidemiology of Extrapulmonary Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Disease – 4 Emerging Infection Program Sites, 2021

Background: Extrapulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (ENTM) infections are difficult to treat and often require prolonged therapy or surgery. Few population-based studies describe ENTM epidemiology, though well-known healthcare-associated outbreaks have occurred. Using the first year of multi-site ENTM surveillance, we characterized rates and how frequently ENTM infections may be related to healthcare. Methods: CDC’s Emerging Infections Program conducted active, laboratory- and population-based surveillance for ENTM cases in 4 sites (Colorado [5 counties], Minnesota [statewide], New York [1 county], and Oregon [statewide]) in 2021. An incident ENTM case was NTM isolation from a non-pulmonary specimen, excluding stool or rectal swabs, in a resident of the surveillance area without either medical record documentation of prior ENTM infection or isolation of ENTM in the prior 12 months. Demographic, clinical, information on selected healthcare and community exposures, and laboratory data were collected via medical record review. We calculated incidence per 100,000 population using U.S. Census population estimates and performed descriptive analyses. Results: A total of 180 incident ENTM cases were reported in 2021. The crude annual incidence rate was 1.3 per 100,000 persons. Incidence increased with age (from 0.95 per 100,000 among 0–17 year-olds to 2.65 per 100,000 among persons ≥65), ranged from 0.8 among non-Hispanic Asian persons to 1.6 per 100,000 in non-Hispanic Black persons, and was similar among males (1.3 per 100,000) and females (1.4 per 100,000; Figure 1). Mycobacterium avium complex (64 [35.6%]) was the most frequently isolated species group, followed by Mycobacterium chelonae complex (31 [17.2%]). Skin and soft tissue infections were the most frequent infection type (37 [20.6%]); 27 cases (15.0%) were associated with disseminated and/or only bloodstream infection, and 56 cases (31.1%) had no infection type documented. Among 93 cases with localized ENTM infections (i.e., infections that were not disseminated and/or only bloodstream infections), 38.7% had only healthcare-related exposures, 14% had only community-related exposures and 6.5% had both exposure types at the site of infection (Figure 2). Healthcare-related exposures at the infection site included surgery (23.7%), injection/infusion (21.5%), and medical devices (18.3%). The most frequent community-related exposure at the infection site was trauma (17.2%). Only one case was part of a known outbreak, which was healthcare-associated. Conclusions: ENTM infections are relatively rare, but nearly half of patients with localized ENTM infections had prior healthcare-related exposures. This indicates that the burden of ENTM infections related to healthcare may be much larger than what has been suggested from reported outbreaks.

Non-Hispanic Black Persons With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Have Lower Rates of Advanced Fibrosis, Cirrhosis, and Liver-Related Events Even After Controlling for Clinical Risk Factors and PNPLA3 Genotype.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is less frequent in non-Hispanic persons (NHB), but there are knowledge gaps in our understanding of disease severity and outcomes of NAFLD in NHB. We compared liver histology and clinical outcomes of NAFLD in non-Hispanic Black persons (NHB) and non-Hispanic White persons (NHW). We compared liver histology and outcomes of 109 NHB and 1,910 NHW adults with biopsy-proven NAFLD participating in the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network observational studies. The relationship between self-reported NHB race/ethnicity and advanced fibrosis was assessed through multivariable logistic regression after controlling for clinical covariates and PNPLA3 genotype. NHB and NHW with NAFLD had similar NAFLD activity scores (NAS, 4.4 vs 4.3, P = 0.87) and proportions with definite metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (59% vs 58%, P = 1.0), but NHB had significantly lower rates of advanced fibrosis (22% vs 34%, P = 0.01) or cirrhosis (4.6% vs 12.1%, P = 0.010). Compared with NHW, NHB had significantly lower frequency of advanced fibrosis (Odds Ratio: 0.48, 95% Confidence Interval: 27-0.86, P = 0.01). In a comparison between 24 NHB and 655 NHW with advanced fibrosis, the NAS (5.6 vs 4.9, P = 0.01) and lobular inflammation grade (2.2 vs 1.7, P < 0.002) were significantly higher among NHB with advanced fibrosis. One NHB and 23 NHW died during follow-up (0.30 vs 0.28 per 100 person-year follow-up). Seven and zero liver-related deaths occurred in NHW and NHB with NAFLD, respectively. The risk of advanced fibrosis in NHB with NAFLD is significantly lower, after controlling for clinical risk factors and PNPLA3 genotype. Although their risk of advanced fibrosis was low, NHB with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis had higher NAS and lobular inflammation, indicating a difference in their relationship between necroinflammation and fibrosis.

Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake among 27-to-45-year-olds in the United States

ObjectiveThe human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine prevents six types of cancer. Previously, this vaccine was only approved for 9–26-year-olds. However, in October 2018 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the HPV vaccine for 27- to 45-year-olds (mid-adults). The current study aimed to assess HPV vaccination among a national sample of U.S adults aged 27–45 years. This study also assessed factors associated with HPV vaccine initiation after age 26. MethodsData were analyzed using the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. The study included two samples: (1) mid-adults aged 27–45 (n = 8556), and (2) mid-adults who self-reported they had initiated HPV vaccination within the 27–45 age range and those who were unvaccinated (n = 7307). The outcome variables were HPV vaccination status and HPV vaccine initiation. The independent variables represented constructs from Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. The odds of HPV vaccination were estimated using weighted multivariable logistic regression models. ResultsOverall, 15.6% had ever received the HPV vaccine and 13.1% initiated their first dose of the vaccine after age 26. Hispanic (aOR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.58, 0.92) and non-Hispanic Asian persons (aOR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.41, 0.84) had lower odds of ever receiving the vaccine than non-Hispanic White persons. Females (aOR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.42, 3.32) had higher odds of initiating the vaccine after age 26 than males. ConclusionsThe ACIP recommendation of shared clinical decision-making emphasizes the role of clinical interactions in HPV vaccine decision-making. Study findings highlight the need to further explore contextual factors that may influence HPV vaccine behavior among mid-adults.

Federal Retail Pharmacy Program Contributions to Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccinations Across Sociodemographic Characteristics - United States, September 1, 2022-September 30, 2023.

The Federal Retail Pharmacy Program (FRPP) facilitated integration of pharmacies as partners in national efforts to scale up vaccination capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic emergency response. To evaluate FRPP's contribution to vaccination efforts across various sociodemographic groups, data on COVID-19 bivalent mRNA vaccine doses administered during September 1, 2022-September 30, 2023, were evaluated from two sources: 1) FRPP data reported directly to CDC and 2) jurisdictional immunization information systems data reported to CDC from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, U.S. territories, and freely associated states. Among 59.8 million COVID-19 bivalent vaccine doses administered in the United States during this period, 40.5 million (67.7%) were administered by FRPP partners. The proportion of COVID-19 bivalent doses administered by FRPP partners ranged from 5.9% among children aged 6 months-4 years to 70.6% among adults aged 18-49 years. Among some racial and ethnic minority groups (e.g., Hispanic or Latino, non-Hispanic Black or African American, non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic Asian persons), ≥45% of COVID-19 bivalent vaccine doses were administered by FRPP partners. Further, in urban and rural areas, FRPP partners administered 81.6% and 60.0% of bivalent vaccine doses, respectively. The FRPP partnership administered approximately two thirds of all bivalent COVID-19 vaccine doses in the United States and provided vaccine access for persons across a wide range of sociodemographic groups, demonstrating that this program could serve as a model to address vaccination services needs for routine vaccines and to provide health services in other public health emergencies.

CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2016-2020.

The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Cancer Institute, is the largest population-based registry focused exclusively on primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the United States (US) and represents the entire US population. This report contains the most up-to-date population-based data on primary brain tumors available and supersedes all previous CBTRUS reports in terms of completeness and accuracy. All rates are age-adjusted using the 2000 US standard population and presented per 100,000 population. The average annual age-adjusted incidence rate (AAAIR) of all malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors was 24.83 per 100,000 population (malignant AAAIR=6.94 and non-malignant AAAIR=17.88). This overall rate was higher in females compared to males (27.85 versus 21.62 per 100,000) and non-Hispanic persons compared to Hispanic persons (25.24 versus 22.61 per 100,000). Gliomas accounted for 26.3% of all tumors. The most commonly occurring malignant brain and other CNS histopathology was glioblastoma (14.2% of all tumors and 50.9% of all malignant tumors), and the most common predominantly non-malignant histopathology was meningioma (40.8% of all tumors and 56.2% of all non-malignant tumors). Glioblastomas were more common in males, and meningiomas were more common in females. In children and adolescents (ages 0-19 years), the incidence rate of all primary brain and other CNS tumors was 6.13 per 100,000 population. There were 86,030 deaths attributed to malignant brain and other CNS tumors between 2016 and 2020. This represents an average annual mortality rate of 4.42 per 100,000 population and an average of 17,206 deaths per year. The five-year relative survival rate following diagnosis of a malignant brain and other CNS tumor was 35.7%, for a non-malignant brain and other CNS tumor the five-year relative survival rate was 91.8%.

A-265 Disparities Among SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Positivity in Healthcare Workers

Abstract Background Early in the COVID-19 pandemic disparities in hospitalizations and mortality rates were seen between race/ethnicities. Currently, the CDC reports that there is a 2.1× and 1.6× increase in risk of hospitalizations and deaths, respectively, for Black non-Hispanic (NH) persons when compared to White NH persons. Additionally, studies have found that Black and Hispanic individuals are more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 as compared to other ethnicities/races. Many socioeconomic factors have been associated with increased risk, however, few if any, studies have investigated the disparities in SARS-CoV-2 exposure for healthcare workers. Methods To gain a better understanding of the risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in healthcare workers, EDTA plasma samples were collected from healthcare workers associated with the University of Maryland Medical System between June 1st, 2020, and August 31st, 2020. Plasma samples were tested for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike Ig/M/A Antibodies using an in-house developed Enzyme-linked Immunoassay and the Ortho Vitros COVID-19 Total Antibody assay. Results 7850 healthcare workers were enrolled (82.3% female). 26.7% were Black NH and 75.3% were White NH individuals. No differences were seen between age or sex between the two groups. Overall, the positivity rate for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 3.5%, however, when stratified by race/ethnicity 6.7% of Black NH individuals and 2.4% of White NH individuals were positive for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. When stratified by sex there were no statistically significant differences. Conclusion These findings suggest that Black NH healthcare workers were 2.6 times more likely to have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 when compared to White NH individuals, irrespective of sex. Further understanding of the geographic and socioeconomic factors that play a role in these findings is needed. However, these findings suggest that heath disparities are prevalent and need to be addressed not only in the communities that our healthcare workers treat, but within our healthcare worker communities themselves.

Retrospective analysis of equity-based optimization for COVID-19 vaccine allocation.

Marginalized racial and ethnic groups in the United States were disproportionally affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. To study these disparities, we construct an age-and-race-stratified mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission fitted to age-and-race-stratified data from 2020 in Oregon and analyze counterfactual vaccination strategies in early 2021. We consider two racial groups: non-Hispanic White persons and persons belonging to BIPOC groups (including non-Hispanic Black persons, non-Hispanic Asian persons, non-Hispanic American-Indian or Alaska-Native persons, and Hispanic or Latino persons). We allocate a limited amount of vaccine to minimize overall disease burden (deaths or years of life lost), inequity in disease outcomes between racial groups (measured with five different metrics), or both. We find that, when allocating small amounts of vaccine (10% coverage), there is a trade-off between minimizing disease burden and minimizing inequity. Older age groups, who are at a greater risk of severe disease and death, are prioritized when minimizing measures of disease burden, and younger BIPOC groups, who face the most inequities, are prioritized when minimizing measures of inequity. The allocation strategies that minimize combinations of measures can produce middle-ground solutions that similarly improve both disease burden and inequity, but the trade-off can only be mitigated by increasing the vaccine supply. With enough resources to vaccinate 20% of the population the trade-off lessens, and with 30% coverage, we can optimize both equity and mortality. Our goal is to provide a race-conscious framework to quantify and minimize inequity that can be used for future pandemics and other public health interventions.

Genetics of Alzheimer's Disease in the African American Population.

Black/African American (AA) individuals have a higher risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) than White non-Hispanic persons of European ancestry (EUR) for reasons that may include economic disparities, cardiovascular health, quality of education, and biases in the methods used to diagnose AD. AD is also heritable, and some of the differences in risk may be due to genetics. Many AD-associated variants have been identified by candidate gene studies, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and genome-sequencing studies. However, most of these studies have been performed using EUR cohorts. In this paper, we review the genetics of AD and AD-related traits in AA individuals. Importantly, studies of genetic risk factors in AA cohorts can elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying AD risk in AA and other populations. In fact, such studies are essential to enable reliable precision medicine approaches in persons with considerable African ancestry. Furthermore, genetic studies of AA cohorts allow exploration of the ways the impact of genes can vary by ancestry, culture, and economic and environmental disparities. They have yielded important gains in our knowledge of AD genetics, and increasing AA individual representation within genetic studies should remain a priority for inclusive genetic study design.

Temporal Trends in Hepatitis C-Related Hospitalizations, United States, 2000-2019.

Hospitalization burden related to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is substantial. We sought to describe temporal trends in hospitalization rates before and after release of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents. We analyzed 2000-2019 data from adults aged ≥18 years in the National Inpatient Sample. Hospitalizations were HCV-related if (1) hepatitis C was the primary diagnosis, or (2) hepatitis C was any secondary diagnosis with a liver-related primary diagnosis. We analyzed characteristics of HCV-related hospitalizations nationally and examined trends in age-adjusted hospitalization rates. During 2000-2019, there were an estimated 1 286 397 HCV-related hospitalizations in the United States. The annual age-adjusted hospitalization rate was lowest in 2019 (18.7/100 000 population) and highest in 2012 (29.6/100 000 population). Most hospitalizations occurred among persons aged 45-64 years (71.8%), males (67.1%), White non-Hispanic persons (60.5%), and Medicaid/Medicare recipients (64.0%). The national age-adjusted hospitalization rate increased during 2000-2003 (annual percentage change [APC], 9.4%; P < .001) and 2003-2013 (APC, 1.8%; P < .001) before decreasing during 2013-2019 (APC, -7.6%; P < .001). Comparing 2000 to 2019, the largest increases in hospitalization rates occurred among persons aged 55-64 years (132.9%), Medicaid recipients (41.6%), and Black non-Hispanic persons (22.3%). Although multiple factors likely contributed, overall HCV-related hospitalization rates declined steadily after 2013, coinciding with the release of DAAs. However, the declines were not observed equally among age, race/ethnicity, or insurance categories. Expanded access to DAA treatment is needed, particularly among Medicaid and Medicare recipients, to reduce disparities and morbidity and eliminate hepatitis C as a public health threat.

Ethnic Disparities in Early-Onset Gastric Cancer Persist across Rural-Urban Geographies.

The incidence of noncardia gastric cancer is increasing in adults ages less than 50 years old. Early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) is characterized by ethnic disparities occurring more in Hispanic persons than non-Hispanic persons. It is unknown whether rural-urban disparities exist in EOGC and if this intersects with ethnic disparities. We utilized the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results 17 Census Tract-level Socioeconomic Status and Rurality Database from 2006 to 2018 to calculate incidence rates and incidence rate ratios of EOGC among Hispanic and non-Hispanic persons by census tract rural-urban location, age, gender, persistent poverty, and stage of disease. We used the Tiwari Method to estimate incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Hispanic persons had higher incidence rates of EOGC compared with non-Hispanic persons in both rural [incident rate ratios (IRR), 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64-2.73] and urban census tracts (IRR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.91-2.16). Similar findings were seen when comparing Hispanic to non-Hispanic persons in rural and urban census tracts by age, stage of disease, and persistent poverty. Higher incidence rates of EOGC among Hispanic persons persist across rural-urban locations. Further research is needed to understand the etiology of this elevated risk in young Hispanics and interventions that may help to modify their outcome. While other cancers have ethnic disparities which may differ by rural-urban location, the ethnic disparity in EOGC among Hispanic and non-Hispanic persons does not differ by rural-urban residence.

Body Mass Index Trends among a Cohort of Subjects Enrolled in Medication-Assisted Treatment Programmes for Opioid Use Disorder: Racial/Ethnic, Gender, and Age Differences.

Opioid use disorder (OUD) and obesity are two pressing public health concerns in the United States (US). However, the relationship between these two epidemics has not been well-studied. Our study aims to describe the prevalence rates of obesity in individuals with OUD from a cohort study and compare that to the expected prevalence that would be observed based upon New Jersey state and US population survey data. Additionally, we sought to study whether Body Mass Index (BMI) distribution in this cohort varied by race/ethnicity, gender, and age. Our subjects (N=151) are part of a drug user cohort study of persons enrolled in medication-assisted treatment (MAT) programmes in New Jersey. Using the New Jersey Behavioral Risk Factor Survey (NJBRFS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), we generated expected BMI distributions based on race/ethnicity, age, and sex. Expected rates were compared to observed BMI. Standardized prevalence ratios were calculated, and 95% confidence intervals were constructed. Among females, obesity was more prevalent in those with OUD than in the general US population. Among persons ≤50 years old, overweight and obesity were more prevalent in those with OUD than in NJBRFS. Persons who did not inject drugs were more likely to be overweight. The prevalence of underweight was significantly higher among Black non-Hispanic minorities, males, older subjects (aged 66-85), and persons who inject drugs. In our study, the trends in BMI vary based on race/ethnicity, gender and age in these patients with OUD. These varying trends highlight the need for tailored screening and prevention strategies. Primary care providers should be aware that their patients with OUD have multiple health problems that need to be addressed beyond their OUD condition itself. Providers are in a pivotal role to screen and implement interventions to improve their health outcomes.

Cancer Screening in the United States During the Second Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

To examine whether cancer screening prevalence in the United States during 2021 has returned to prepandemic levels using nationally representative data. Information on receipt of age-eligible screening for breast (women age 50-74 years), cervical (women without a hysterectomy age 21-65 years), prostate (men age 55-69 years), and colorectal cancer (men and women age 50-75 years) according to the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations was obtained from the 2019 and 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Past-year screening prevalence in 2019 and 2021 and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs), 2021 versus 2019, with their 95% CIs were calculated using complex survey logistic regression models. Between 2019 and 2021, past-year screening in the United States decreased from 59.9% to 57.1% (aPR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.97) for breast cancer, from 45.3% to 39.0% (aPR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.89) for cervical cancer, and from 39.5% to 36.3% (aPR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.97) for prostate cancer. Declines were most notable for non-Hispanic Asian persons. Colorectal cancer screening prevalence remained unchanged because an increase in past-year stool testing (from 7.0% to 10.3%; aPR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.58) offset a decline in colonoscopy (from 15.5% to 13.8%; aPR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.95). The increase in stool testing was most pronounced in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations and in persons with low socioeconomic status. Past-year screening prevalence for breast, cervical, and prostate cancer among age-eligible adults in the United States continued to be lower than prepandemic levels in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, reinforcing the importance of return to screening health system outreach and media campaigns. The large increase in stool testing emphasizes the role of home-based screening during health care system disruptions.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Mortality by Industry and Occupation — United States, 2020

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a progressive lung disease, is characterized by long-term respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation (1). COPD accounts for most of the deaths from chronic lower respiratory diseases, the sixth leading cause of death in the United States in 2020.* Workplace exposures and tobacco smoking are risk factors for COPD; however, one in four workers with COPD have never smoked (2-4). To describe COPD mortality among U.S. residents aged ≥15 years categorized as ever-employed (i.e., with information on their usual industry and occupation), CDC analyzed the most recent 2020 multiple cause-of-death data† from 46 states and New York City.§ Among 3,077,127 decedents, 316,023 (10.3%) had COPD¶ listed on the death certificate. The highest age-adjusted** COPD death rates per 100,000 ever-employed persons were for females (101.3), White persons (116.9), and non-Hispanic or Latino (non-Hispanic) persons (115.8). The highest proportionate mortality ratios (PMRs)†† were for workers employed in the mining industry (1.3) and in food preparation and serving related occupations (1.3). Elevated COPD mortality among workers in certain industries and occupations underscores the importance of targeted interventions (e.g., reduction or elimination of COPD-associated risk factors, engineering controls, and workplace smoke-free policies) to prevent COPD from developing and to intervene before illness becomes symptomatic or severe.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Exposure, Disease Susceptibility, and Clinical Outcomes during COVID-19 Pandemic in National Cohort of Adults, United States.

We examined racial/ethnic disparities for COVID-19 seroconversion and hospitalization within a prospective cohort (n = 6,740) in the United States enrolled in March 2020 and followed-up through October 2021. Potential SARS-CoV-2 exposure, susceptibility to COVID-19 complications, and access to healthcare varied by race/ethnicity. Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic participants had more exposure risk and difficulty with healthcare access than white participants. Participants with more exposure had greater odds of seroconversion. Participants with more susceptibility and more barriers to healthcare had greater odds of hospitalization. Race/ethnicity positively modified the association between susceptibility and hospitalization. Findings might help to explain the disproportionate burden of SARS-CoV-2 infections and complications among Hispanic/Latino/a and Black non-Hispanic persons. Primary and secondary prevention efforts should address disparities in exposure, vaccination, and treatment for COVID-19.

Disparities in traumatic brain injury-related deaths—United States, 2020

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects how the brain functions and remains a prominent cause of death in the United States. Although preventable, anyone can experience a TBI and epidemiological research suggests some groups have worse health outcomes following the injury. Methods: We analyzed 2020 multiple-cause-of-death data from the National Vital Statistics System to describe TBI mortality by geography, sociodemographic characteristics, mechanism of injury (MOI), and injury intent. Deaths were included if they listed an injury International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) underlying cause of death code and a TBI-related ICD-10 code in one of the multiple-cause-of-death fields. Results: During 2020, 64,362 TBI-related deaths occurred and age-adjusted rates, per 100,000 population, were highest among persons residing in the South (20.2). Older adults (≥75) displayed the highest number and rate of TBI-related deaths compared with other age groups and unintentional falls and suicide were the leading external causes among this older age group. The age-adjusted rate of TBI-related deaths in males was more than three times the rate of females (28.3 versus 8.4, respectively); further, males displayed higher numbers and age-adjusted rates compared with females for all the principal MOIs that contributed to a TBI-related death. American Indian or Alaska Native, Non-Hispanic (AI/AN) persons had the highest age-adjusted rate (29.0) of TBI-related deaths when compared with other racial and ethnic groups. Suicide was the leading external cause of injury contributing to a TBI-related death among AI/AN persons. Practical application: Prevention efforts targeting older adult falls and suicide are warranted to reduce disparities in TBI mortality among older adults and AI/AN persons. Effective strategies are described in CDC’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, & Injuries (STEADI) initiative to reduce older adult falls and CDC’s Preventing Suicide: A Technical Package of Policy, Programs, and Practices for the best available evidence in suicide prevention.

CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2015-2019.

The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Cancer Institute, is the largest population-based registry focused exclusively on primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the United States (US) and represents the entire US population. This report contains the most up-to-date population-based data on primary brain tumors available and supersedes all previous reports in terms of completeness and accuracy. All rates are age-adjusted using the 2000 US standard population and presented per 100,000 population. The average annual age-adjusted incidence rate (AAAIR) of all malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors was 24.71 per 100,000 population (malignant AAAIR=7.02 and non-malignant AAAIR=17.69). This overall rate was higher in females compared to males (27.62 versus 21.60 per 100,000) and non-Hispanic persons compared to Hispanic persons (25.09 versus 22.95 per 100,000). The most commonly occurring malignant brain and other CNS histopathology was glioblastoma (14.2% of all tumors and 50.1% of all malignant tumors), and the most common non-malignant histopathology was meningioma (39.7% of all tumors and 55.4% of all non-malignant tumors). Glioblastoma was more common in males, and meningiomas were more common in females. In children and adolescents (ages 0-19years), the incidence rate of all primary brain and other CNS tumors was 6.20 per 100,000 population. An estimated 93,470 new cases of malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors are expected to be diagnosed in the US population in 2022 (26,670 malignant and 66,806 non-malignant). There were 84,264 deaths attributed to malignant brain and other CNS tumors between 2015 and 2019. This represents an average annual mortality rate of 4.41 per 100,000 population and an average of 16,853 deaths per year. The five-year relative survival rate following diagnosis of a malignant brain and other CNS tumor was 35.7%, while for non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors the five-year relative survival rate was 91.8%.

Substance use related violent deaths among racial/ethnic groups in the United States

While prior research highlights the overlap of substance use and violent death, few examine this overlap among different racial/ethnic groups or how patterns change over time. This study examines how substance use related deaths differ by racial/ethnic groups in the United States. We use data from the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS), which includes violent deaths from 43 states in the U.S., collected for the decade between 2009 and 2019 (N = 226,459). Fixed-effects multivariate models examined whether race/ethnicity was associated with substance use-related death over time, controlling for additional demographic and clinical factors. Results showed a significantly larger rate of increase over time for African American and Hispanic (any race) persons compared to White non-Hispanic persons for most types of substance use-related deaths. While current rates of substance use may show little variability between African American, Hispanic, and White non-Hispanic individuals, this research suggests that the consequences for substance use, including death, may be disproportional.

Hispanic ethnicity and mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19.

BackgroundHispanic persons living in the United States (U.S.) are at higher risk of infection and death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared with non-Hispanic persons. Whether this disparity exists among critically ill patients with COVID-19 is unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate ethnic disparities in mortality among critically ill adults with COVID-19 enrolled in the Study of the Treatment and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (STOP-COVID).MethodsMulticenter cohort study of adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units (ICU) at 67 U.S. hospitals from March 4 to May 9, 2020. Multilevel logistic regression was used to evaluate 28-day mortality across racial/ethnic groups.ResultsA total of 2153 patients were included (994 [46.2%] Hispanic and 1159 [53.8%] non-Hispanic White). The median (IQR) age was 62 (51–71) years (non-Hispanic White, 66 [57–74] years; Hispanic, 56 [46–67] years), and 1462 (67.9%) were men. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, Hispanic patients were younger; were less likely to have hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, or heart failure; and had longer duration of symptoms prior to ICU admission. During median (IQR) follow-up of 14 (7–24) days, 785 patients (36.5%) died. In analyses adjusted for age, sex, clinical characteristics, and hospital size, Hispanic patients had higher odds of death compared with non-Hispanic White patients (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.12–1.84).ConclusionsAmong critically ill adults with COVID-19, Hispanic patients were more likely to die than non-Hispanic White patients, even though they were younger and had lower comorbidity burden. This finding highlights the need to provide earlier access to care to Hispanic individuals with COVID-19, especially given our finding of longer duration of symptoms prior to ICU admission among Hispanic patients. In addition, there is a critical need to address ongoing disparities in post hospital discharge care for patients with COVID-19.

Provisional COVID-19 Age-Adjusted Death Rates, by Race and Ethnicity - United States, 2020-2021.

Disparities in COVID-19 death rates by race and ethnicity have been reported in the United States (1,2). In response to these disparities, preventive, medical care, and social service assistance programs were implemented to lessen disparities in COVID-19 outcomes, including grants to support state, tribal, local, and territorial health department responses (3). The potential impact of such efforts on annual changes in racial and ethnic disparities in mortality rates that identify COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death has not been previously reported. This analysis used U.S. provisional mortality data from death certificates collected by CDC's National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) to estimate changes in COVID-19-related age-adjusted death rates (AADRs) by race and ethnicity during 2020-2021. Compared with non-Hispanic multiracial persons (the group with the lowest death rate), significant decreases in AADR ratios occurred during 2020-2021 among non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons (34.0%), non-Hispanic Asian (Asian) persons (37.6%), non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) persons (40.2%), Hispanic persons (37.1%), and non-Hispanic White (White) persons (14%); a non-statistically significant 7.2% increase in AADR ratio occurred among non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (NH/OPI) persons. Despite reductions in AADR disparities from 2020 to 2021, large disparities in AADR by race and ethnicity remained in 2021. Providing effective preventive interventions, including vaccination and clinical care, to all communities in proportion to their need for these interventions is necessary to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 deaths.