Introduction: Knowledge of time-to-response after initiation of therapy (TTR) may influence treatment recommendations made to patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aBNHL) given the potential for rapid disease growth. If reported in clinical trials, TTR is dependent upon the timing of protocol-specified imaging response assessments (IRA) and does not account for clinical response to therapy (Rc), which may precede radiographic response (Rr). Here we report TTR and other response-related outcomes in pts with R/R aBNHL treated with polatuzumab (pola). Methods: Pts analyzed were those with non-Burkitt R/R aBNHL diagnosed on most recent tissue biopsy and first treated with pola at the University of Pennsylvania from 7/2019 to 12/2020. Rc was defined as reduction in lymph node size on examination, resolution of disease-related symptoms, normalization of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) previously >2x upper limit of normal or disease response on imaging performed for indication other than IRA. Rr was assessed per Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Timing of clinical/laboratory assessments and IRA were at the discretion of the treating clinician. Data were censored on 3/1/2021. Results: Fifty pts were included in this analysis. Baseline clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics at time of pola initiation are listed in Table 1. Nineteen pts (38%) were treated with the intent to bridge to cellular therapies (CT). Median number of cycles of pola received was 3. Rc was achieved by 18 pts (36%), Rr by 16 pts (32%) and the composite outcome of Rc or Rr (overall response, [Ro]) by 24 pts (48%). IRA was not performed for 9 pts: 7 due to proceeding to planned CT (5 with Rc) and 2 due to death not attributed to aBNHL with ongoing Rc. The median TTRc, TTRr and earliest of TTRc or TTRr (TTRe) were 21 d (range 7-41 d), 64 d (range 17-137 d) and 22 d (7-67 d), respectively. Of 12 pts who achieved Rc and had subsequent IRA performed, 8 achieved Rr. Twelve pts stopped tx in remission: 7 pts due to proceeding to planned CT, 3 due to toxicity (gastrointestinal in 2 pts and neuropathy in 1 pt) and 2 pts due to choice. Excluding the 7 pts proceeding to planned CT in remission, the estimated proportion of pts with ongoing Rc and Rr at 180 d were 53% and 51%, respectively. Of characteristics listed in Table 1, non-high grade B cell histology and receipt of prior CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell therapy were significantly associated with achievement of Ro; additionally, age ≤60 years, largest tumor diameter ≤7.5 cm and disease refractory to most recent prior therapy were significantly associated with shorter TTRe. Conclusions: For R/R aBHL pts treated with pola at our institution, frequently with the intention to bridge to CT, 48% achieved Rc or Rr with median TTR of 22 d. These findings may further inform use of pola in the standard-of-care and investigational settings. Keywords: Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract M. E Hughes Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Genzyme, Janssen, AbbVie, Karyopharm Research funding: Acerta S. D Nasta Consultant or advisory role: Morphosys, Merck Research funding: Roche/Genentech, Millennium/Takeda, Pharmacyclics, ATARA, Forty Seven J. N Gerson Consultant or advisory role: Pharmacyclics, Genentech, AbbVie Research funding: Loxo J. Svoboda Consultant or advisory role: Seattle Genetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmacyclics, Imbrium Therapeutics, Genmab, Adaptive Biotechnologies, ADC Therapeutics, Atara Biotherapeutics Research funding: Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Pharmacyclics, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte Educational grants: Imbrium Therapeutics E. A Chong Consultant or advisory role: Novartis, Tessa Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kite/Gilead S. J Schuster Consultant or advisory role: Celgene, Nordic Nanovector, Novartis, AbbVie, Acerta, Alimera Sciences, BeiGene, Juno Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, Tessa Therapeutics, Genetech/Roche, Research funding: Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Merck, Genetech/Roche, Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, AbbVie, Incyte, TG Therapeutics, DTRM, S. K Barta Consultant or advisory role: Monsanto Honoraria: Atara, Seattle Genetics, Janssen, Pfizer, Acrotech Research funding: Seattle Genetics, D. J Landsburg Consultant or advisory role: Morphosys, Karyoparhm, Celgene Research funding: Takeda, Curis, Triphase Other remuneration: Karyopharm
Read full abstract