Non-fumigant Nematicides Research Articles

Unraveling the enigma of root-knot nematodes: from origins to advanced management strategies in agriculture.

Integrated management strategies, including novel nematicides and resilient cultivars, offer sustainable solutions to combat root-knot nematodes, crucial for safeguarding global agriculture against persistent threats. Root-knot nematodes (RKN) pose a significant threat to a diverse range of host plants, with their obligatory endoparasitic nature leading to substantial agricultural losses. RKN spend much of their lives inside or in contact by secreting plant cell wall-modifying enzymes resulting in the giant cell development for establishing host-parasite relationships. Additionally, inflicting physical harm to host plants, RKN also contributes to disease complexes creation with fungi and bacteria. This review comprehensively explores the origin, history, distribution, and physiological races of RKN, emphasizing their economic impact on plants through gall formation. Management strategies, ranging from cultural and physical to biological and chemical controls, along with resistance mechanisms and marker-assisted selection, are explored. While recognizing the limitations of traditional nematicides, recent breakthroughs in non-fumigant alternatives like fluensulfone, spirotetramat, and fluopyram offer promising avenues for sustainable RKN management. Despite the success of resistance mechanisms like the Mi gene, challenges persist, prompting the need for integrative approaches to tackle Mi-virulent isolates. In conclusion, the review stresses the importance of innovative and resilient control measures for sustainable agriculture, emphasizing ongoing research to address evolving challenges posed by RKN. The integration of botanicals, resistant cultivars, and biological controls, alongside advancements in non-fumigant nematicides, contributes novel insights to the field, laying the ground work for future research directions to ensure the long-term sustainability of agriculture in the face of persistent RKN threats.

Enhancing Reniform Nematode Management in Sweetpotato by Complementing Host-Plant Resistance with Nonfumigant Nematicides.

The reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis Linford and Oliveira) adversely impacts the quality and quantity of sweetpotato storage roots. Management of R. reniformis in sweetpotato remains a challenge because host plant resistance is not available, fumigants are detrimental to the environment and health, and crop rotation is not effective. We screened a core set of 24 sweetpotato plant introductions (PIs) against R. reniformis. Four PIs were resistant, and 10 were moderately resistant to R. reniformis, suggesting these PIs can serve as sources of resistance for sweetpotato resistance breeding programs. PI 595869, PI 153907, and PI 599386 suppressed 83 to 89% egg production relative to the susceptible control 'Beauregard', and these PIs were employed in subsequent experiments to determine if their efficacy against R. reniformis can be further increased by applying nonfumigant nematicides oxamyl, fluopyram, and fluensulfone. A 34 to 93% suppression of nematode reproduction was achieved by the application of nonfumigant nematicides, with oxamyl providing the best suppression followed by fluopyram and fluensulfone. Although sweetpotato cultivars resistant to R. reniformis are currently not available and there is a need for the development of safer yet highly effective nonfumigant nematicides, results from the current study suggest that complementing host plant resistance with nonfumigant nematicides can serve as an important tool for effective and sustainable nematode management.

Non-fumigant nematicides and root-knot nematode management in Californian carrots

Non-fumigant nematicides and root-knot nematode management in Californian carrots

Experts’ opinion on the sustainable use of nematicides in Mediterranean intensive horticulture

Aim of study: Root-knot nematodes are considered a common limiting factor to reaching premium quality and economically viable yields in horticultural crops. Soil disinfestation with agrochemical fumigants has been the main nematode control method until their recent ban due to environmental and social concerns. This paper explores farmers and agricultural advisors’ opinion and preferences on the sustainable use of available nematode control methods, considering sustainability as an integration of nematicidal effectiveness, reduction of environmental harmful effects and preservation of human health. Area of study: This study has been carried out between farm advisors of intensive horticultural crop areas in Southern Spain. Material and methods: Farm advisors’ opinion and preferences on the use of nematicides was evaluated following an opinion survey and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The analysis done was exploratory. Main results: Providing that current available control methods give enough nematicidal effectiveness to get a profitable yield, the group of farm advisors showed a great consciousness on the use of sustainable alternatives for nematode control in intensive horticultural crops, prioritizing biosolarization as the first option, followed by biopesticides and fumigant nematicides in third place. The use of ozone and non-fumigant nematicides with high toxicity profiles were considered the last options, but new generation nematicides with lower ecotoxicity profiles are also considered as an important tool in sustainable nematode management. Research highlights: These results provide a prediction of farmers' responses to the sustainable use of nematicides promoted by the European Union when agrochemical fumigants are banned.

Efficacy of five nematicides against root-knot nematode when applied via single and double drip tapes in a Florida sandy soil.

The efficacy of drip-applied nematicides depends on adequate product distribution, which can be difficult in sandy soils. Three new non-fumigant nematicides (fluazaindolizine, fluensulfone, fluopyram), together with two old nematicides, oxamyl and metam potassium, were evaluated when applied via single and double drip tapes to control root-knot nematode in cucumber and squash in Florida between February 2020 and December 2022. Nematicide applications via double drip tapes resulted in lower root gall infection (and tend to have higher yield) as compared to a single tape for fluopyram, but no difference was noted between single and double tapes for oxamyl and fluazaindolizine. Fluensulfone response was somewhere in between and metam potassium had higher squash yield when applied with double tapes. Root-knot infection was higher in cucumber than in squash, and metam potassium had the highest yields and lowest nematode infection compared to other nematicide treatments. The benefit of double versus single drip tapes depended on the type of nematicide that was applied and was evident for nematicides that have poor water solubility like fluopyram. Some benefit was noted for metam potassium, but no or limited benefit was noted for oxamyl, fluazaindolizine and fluensulfone. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

Simultaneous determination of the nematicide fluensulfone and its two major metabolites in soils by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

A fast and sensitive method for simultaneously detecting nonfumigant nematicide fluensulfone (FSF) and its two major metabolites [3,4,4-trifluorobut-3-ene-1-sulfonic acid (BSA) and 5‑chloro-1,3-thiazole-2-sulfonic acid (TSA)] in different types of agricultural soils (black soil, krasnozem, sierozem) was established and validated through ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The samples were prepared by a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method. The soil samples were firstly extracted with acetonitrile/water (4/1) and then purified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Parameters influencing purification efficiency and recoveries, such as the type and the amount of sorbent were evaluated and compared. The overall average recoveries of three target analytes in soils were in the range of 73.1%-113.9% and the relative standard deviations (including intra-day and inter-day precision) were less than 12.7%. The limit of quantification was 5 μg/kg for all three compounds. The established method was successfully applied to examine the degradation of FSF and the formation of its two major metabolites in three different types of soil, indicating its efficacy in investigating the environmental behavior of FSF in agricultural soil system

The effect of abamectin application in combination with agronomic measures on the control efficacy of cucumber root-knot nematodes and the cucumber yield.

As a registered non-fumigant nematicide, abamectin has been widely used as a soil treatment against many cash crop nematode diseases. In a previous study, we found that soil adsorption hindered the stable performance of abamectin against root-knot nematodes in the field. In this study, an efficient and labor-saving application method of soil blending abamectin combined with rotary tillage, a common agronomic measure, was developed to improve the efficacy of abamectin against root-knot nematode disease. We revealed the role of four parameters in this application method. At an abamectin dose of 750 g a.i. ha-1 , spray water volume of 675 L ha-1 and rotation depth of 20 cm, abamectin was well distributed in the 0-20 cm soil layer at a concentration of 0.41-0.46 mg kg-1 , the efficacy against root-knot nematode disease was 72.12%, and the cucumber yield was 51.93 t ha-1 . At the same dosage, root irrigation and flood irrigation measures resulted in only 29.28% and 33.43% control, with cucumber yields of 42.96 and 44.73 t ha-1 , respectively. To control root-knot nematode disease with abamectin, a soil blending application combined with rotary tilling is superior to leaching application combined with the agronomic measure of irrigation. The former application method can improve the dispersion of abamectin in the soil, enhance the efficacy of abamectin against root-knot nematodes and maintain a stable cucumber yield. In addition, the increased labor required for application combined with agronomic measures is negligible and has excellent application prospects. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

Impact of non-fumigant nematicides on reproduction and pathogenicity of Meloidogyne enterolobii and disease severity in tobacco.

Meloidogyne enterolobii is a highly aggressive quarantine pathogen which threatens the multibillion-dollar tobacco industry and is not manageable with the currently available management methods in tobacco. There is currently no known host plant resistance in tobacco and previous studies have shown that the lower level of the currently recommended rate of non-fumigant nematicides does not provide satisfactory management of M. enterolobii. The current study was conducted with the hypothesis that M. enterolobii can be better managed using a single soil application of the maximum allowed rate of non-fumigant nematicides. Treatments involved three non-fumigant chemical nematicides (oxamyl, fluopyram, and fluensulfone), a biological nematicide derived from Burkholderia, and a non-treated control. Fluensulfone significantly suppressed the nematode reproduction relative to the control, the suppression being 71% for eggs and 86% for the second stage juveniles (J2). Fluopyram also suppressed nematode reproduction, although this was statistically insignificant, with the suppression being 26% and 37% for eggs and J2, respectively. Oxamyl significantly suppressed J2 (80%), but not eggs (50%) in relation to the control. The most significant reduction of disease severity was achieved by the application of fluensulfone (64%), followed by oxamyl (54%) and fluopyram (48%). Except for fluensulfone, which significantly reduced the root biomass, none of the nematicides significantly impacted root and shoot biomass. The biological nematicide did not significantly affect nematode reproduction, pathogenicity, or disease severity. The results from the current study suggest that while the non-fumigant nematicides provided a good level of the nematode suppression, more research is needed to improve the efficacy of non-fumigant nematicides through employing better application methods or finding better chemistries.

Evaluation of fumigant and non-fumigant nematicides for management of Rotylenchulus reniformis on sweetpotato.

Reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) is a major pest of sweetpotato in many production regions in Southern United States. Applying soil fumigants and non-fumigant nematicides are the primary management strategies available to growers. This study compared the relative efficacy of nematicides (1,3-dichloropropene, fluopyram, oxamyl, fluazaindolizine, aldicarb, Majestene, and fluensulfone) for management of reniform nematode on sweetpotato. Fumigating soil with 1,3-dichloropropene consistently reduced soil population densities of reniform nematode at the time of planting in both trial years (31 - 36% reduction relative to the untreated control); however, the duration of suppression varied greatly by growing season. A similar trend was observed with fluopyram (56 - 67% reduction) and aldicarb (63 - 65% reduction), which provided season-long suppression of reniform nematode population development in 2021 but had no impact in 2022. In 2021, nematicide application had no impact on yield; however, in 2022, oxamyl and aldicarb increased the yield of U.S.#1 grade sweetpotato. Overall, soil fumigation with 1,3-dichloropropene and in-furrow application of fluopyram and aldicarb provided the most consistent suppression of reniform nematode on sweetpotato.

Effect of Different Rates, Application Timing, and Combination of Nonfumigant Nematicides in Control of Meloidogyne incognita in Watermelon

The use of plasticulture systems, which consist of raised beds, plastic mulch, and drip irrigation, for watermelon production has increased in the Southern United States in recent decades. The root-knot nematode (RKN), Meloidogyne incognita, is a significant pathogen of watermelon production in plasticulture systems and can cause varying levels of yield loss depending on the nematode population density if not properly controlled. A few new nonfumigant nematicides (fluensulfone, fluazaindolizine, and fluopyram) have emerged in the last decade to help manage RKNs. A 2-year field study was conducted to examine the impact of different rates, application timing (i.e., days before transplanting, at transplanting, and days after transplanting), and combinations of these new nematicides and an older one (oxamyl) in control of RKN in watermelon cultivar Fascination. The nematicide treatments, except for a single-time application of oxamyl in 2019 and 2020, significantly reduced root galling compared with the untreated check. Similarly, all treatments, except a single application of oxamyl in 2020, resulted in a lower soil population level of M. incognita than the untreated check. All nematicide treatments, except a single application of fluensulfone and a two-time application of fluopyram at a half-recommended rate, increased fruit yields when compared with the untreated check. Overall, the drip application of new chemistries, known as 3-F nematicides, has been shown to be a useful option for RKN management in watermelon. At-planting application of fluazaindolizine or fluopyram and two-time applications of oxamyl based on the manufacturer's recommended rate show potential to prevent crop loss.

Non-fumigant Nematicides are Promising Alternatives to Fumigants for the Management of Meloidogyne Enterolobii in Tobacco.

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of three currently available non-fumigant chemical nematicides (oxamyl, fluopyram, and fluensulfone) and a biological nematicide derived from Burkholderia against Meloidogyne enterolobii on tobacco in a growth room environment. The non-fumigant chemical nematicides greatly suppressed nematode egg production compared to the untreated control, the suppression being 99.9% for fluensulfone and oxamyl, and 93% for fluopyram. Similarly, oxamyl-, fluensulfone-, and fluopyram-treated pots, respectively, had 99%, 98%, and 94% less J2/100 cm3 of soil than those in the control. The biological nematicide did not have a significant effect on nematode egg production and the soil abundance of J2. The root biomass of tobacco was significantly reduced by the application of fluensulfone, while the effects of oxamyl, fluopyram, and Burkholderia metabolites were not significant compared to the untreated control. Results from this study suggest that non-fumigant nematicides have a potential to serve as an alternative to fumigant nematicides.

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Soil Disinfestation Methods against Root-Knot Nematodes in Mediterranean Intensive Horticulture.

Losses caused by phytoparasitic nematodes in crops depend directly on their soil densities at the start of the crop, so reducing their populations before planting is the main aim of nematological management. Efficacies in reducing Meloidogyne soil populations of soil disinfestation methods, such as agrochemicals, botanicals, or biosolarization were estimated on multiple field trials conducted over fourteen years in intensive horticultural crops. Soil nematode populations were reduced by 87 to 78% after fumigation with 1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin and dimethyl-disulphide, respectively. Non-fumigant nematicides such as azadirachtin, dazomet, fenamiphos, fluopyram, fosthiazate, metam-sodium, and oxamyl showed efficacies ranging from 51 to 64%, whereas the efficacy of natural products, such as abamectin, garlic extracts, or essential oils was 41 to 48%. Biosolarization with chicken manure had an efficacy of 73%. An economic cost-benefit study of nematode management methods was performed for seven vegetable–M. incognita pathosystems. Fumigation with 1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin and biosolarization with chicken manure were the only treatments able to reduce RKN populations above 1000 and 750 J2 per 100 cm3 of soil, respectively, to levels below the nematode economic damage threshold, keeping profitability. Fumigation was able to manage RKN soil densities up to 350 J2 per 100 cm3 of soil in most susceptible crops as aubergine or cucumber and up to 1000 J2 per 100 cm3 of soil for more tolerant crops, such as other cucurbits, pepper, or tomato. Other nematicidal treatments were not able to reduce RKN populations above 200–300 J2/100 cm3 of soil below the economic thresholds but were profitable when RKN densities were below the limits of 200–300 J2/100 cm3 of soil.

On-Farm Evaluations of Nonfumigant Nematicides on Nematode Communities of Peach.

Experiments were established to evaluate the efficacy of currently available nonfumigant chemical and biological nematicides against nematode communities in peach orchards in two different geographic regions of South Carolina: the Upstate and Ridge. The treatments included sole or mixed application of two chemical nematicides (oxamyl and fluopyram) and a biological nematicide (Majestene) plus an untreated control. Ring nematode and lesion nematode were predominant in Upstate and Ridge orchards, respectively. Fluopyram was the most effective nematicide in the Upstate orchard, and it reduced plant-parasitic nematodes by 69% relative to the untreated control at 3months postapplication. Similarly, fluopyram and oxamyl suppressed 74 to 87% of plant-parasitic nematodes in the Ridge orchard at 2months postapplication. Significant effects of Majestene on plant-parasitic nematodes was not observed. Mixed applications of nematicides were also effective in suppressing plant-parasitic nematodes although the suppressions were not always significant from sole applications or the control. The chemical nematicides significantly reduced free-living nematodes in the first 2months following their applications in the Ridge orchard, the reductions ranging from 60 to 79% relative to the control. However, free-living nematode populations quickly rebounded to the highest level in 3months following the nematicide applications. Free-living nematode communities in the Upstate orchard did not experience any significant effects of nematicides until 4 months following nematicide application; at that time there was a 60 to 68% decline in populations. Results from this study suggest that the nonfumigant nematicides can only provide a short-term management of plant-parasitic nematodes in peach.

Effect of fumigants and non-fumigants on nematode and weed control, crop yield, and soil microbial diversity and predicted functionality in a strawberry production system

Fumigants are commonly used to control soil-borne pathogens of high-value crops, but they may also impact non-target soil microorganisms. Increasing interest in the use of sustainable management practices to control plant- and root-parasitic nematodes has resulted in the formulation of non-fumigant nematicides (chemicals or bionematicides) which are considered environmentally friendly alternatives to fumigants. However, the impact of these new products compared to standard fumigants on soil-borne pathogens, plant production, and the diversity and composition of non-target microbial communities in all crops remains unclear. To begin to address this knowledge gap, we examined the effect of fumigants commonly used in Florida (United States) strawberry production and newly formulated non-fumigant nematicides on nematode and weed control, plant growth, crop yield, and bacterial and fungal community diversity and predicted functionality. We found the standard fumigants increased crop yields and reduced weed pressure more than non-fumigants. Both fumigants and non-fumigants were an efficient management strategy to control sting nematodes. Treatments also impacted the abundance of specific beneficial and antagonistic taxa. Both fumigants and non-fumigants reduced soil bacterial and fungal diversity, an effect that remained for six months, thus suggesting a potential residual impact of these products on soil microorganisms. However, only fumigants altered soil microbial community composition and reduced network complexity, inducing a decrease or even a loss of some predicted bacterial and fungal functions, particularly during the first weeks after fumigation. Nevertheless, soil collected at the end of the season showed significant levels of root-knot nematode suppression in a growth chamber experiment, irrespective of the previous treatment. By linking the effect of fumigants and non-fumigants on soil-borne pests, plant and production, and the soil microbiome, this study increases our knowledge regarding the environmental impact of these products.

Meloidogyne Incognita Management using Fumigant and Non-fumigant Nematicides on Sweet Potato.

Southern root-knot nematode (SRKN, Meloidogyne incognita) is a major pest of sweet potato, and nematicides are needed to manage this nematode. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy of fluazaindolizine, a new non-fumigant nematicide, in comparison with the fumigant nematicide 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and non-fumigant nematicides fluopyram and oxamyl for (1) SRKN management, (2) impacts on free-living nematodes, and (3) sweet potato yield in field trials. Among all nematicides, 1,3-D at 84 kg/ha most consistently (2 of 3 years) managed SRKN soil populations and improved yield. Fluazaindolizine at 2.24 kg/ha and fluazindolizine at 1.12 kg/ha plus oxamyl at 2.14 kg/ha managed SRKN populations and improved yield in 1 of 3 years, whereas fluazaindolizine alone at 1.12 kg/ha only decreased SRKN populations. Fluopyram at 238 g/ha did not affect SRKN or yield. Nematicide application also had non-target effects on free-living nematodes with 1,3-D reducing abundances relative to untreated most frequently (2018 and 2020), but other nematicides also reducing free-living nematode abundances in 2020. In summary, 1,3-D is the most consistent option for SRKN control on sweet potato, but fluazaindolizine, oxamyl or combinations of the two products can also be effective.

Meta-Analysis of the Field Efficacy of Seed- and Soil-Applied Nematicides onMeloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis Across the U.S. CottonBelt.

Meta-analysis was used to compare yield protection and nematode suppression provided by two seed-applied and two soil-applied nematicides against Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis on cotton across 3 years and several trial locations in the U.S. Cotton Belt. Nematicides consisted of thiodicarb- and fluopyram-treated seed, aldicarb and fluopyram applied in furrow, and combinations of the seed treatments and soil-applied fluopyram. The nematicides had no effect on nematode reproduction or root infection but had a significant impact on seed cotton yield response ([Formula: see text]), with an average increase of 176 and 197 kg/ha relative to the nontreated control in M. incognita and R. reniformis infested fields, respectively. However, because of significant variation in yield protection and nematode suppression by nematicides, five or six moderator variables (cultivar resistance [M. incognita only], nematode infestation level, nematicide treatment, application method, trial location, and growing season) were used depending on nematode species. In M. incognita-infested fields, greater yield protection was observed with nematicides applied in furrow and with seed-applied + in-furrow than with solo seed-applied nematicide applications. Most notable of these in-furrow nematicides were aldicarb and fluopyram (>131 g/ha) with or without a seed-applied nematicide compared with thiodicarb. In R. reniformis-infested fields, moderator variables provided no further explanation of the variation in yield response produced by nematicides. Furthermore, moderator variables provided little explanation of the variation in nematode suppression by nematicides in M. incognita- and R. reniformis-infested fields. The limited explanation by the moderator variables on the field efficacy of nematicides in M. incognita- and R. reniformis-infested fields demonstrates the difficulty of managing these pathogens with nonfumigant nematicides across the U.S. Cotton Belt.

Root-knot nematode damage to a cucurbit double crop is increased by chloropicrin fumigation on the previous tomato crop.

Double-cropping is a common practice in vegetable plasticulture whereby a second crop is planted on the same plastic bed as the first crop. Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are one of the major soilborne constraints in double-cropped vegetables due to nematode population build-up on the first crop. We evaluated the effect of fumigant and non-fumigant nematicides applied on the first crop, on nematode infection and yield of the second crop in 10 field trials between 2017 and 2020. Fumigants were chloropicrin (Pic100), chloropicrin +1,3-D (PicClor60), and non-fumigant nematicides were oxamyl (Vydate), fluensulfone (Nimitz), fluopyram (Velum) and fluazaindolizine (Salibro). The first crop was tomato and double crops were cucumber, squash, zucchini, and cantaloupe. Fumigation with chloropicrin on the first crop increased root-knot nematode damage on the double-crop at the end of the season in seven trials, while the opposite was noted in one trial, and no difference was noted in two trials. Fumigation with chloropicrin+1,3-D resulted in root-knot nematode damage less than chloropicrin but more than non-fumigated plots. Cucurbit yield was greater in non-fumigated beds in four trials, and in chloropicrin-treated beds in two trials. Fluensulfone reduced root-knot nematode damage on the second crop in five out of 10 trials. Our results indicate that chloropicrin applied on the tomato crop may lead to increased root-knot nematode damage on the double crop. More research is needed to understand the processes behind this, but it is possibly related to a reduction in natural nematode soil suppressiveness due to the broad-spectrum fungicidal activity of chloropicrin. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

Transcriptional changes of biochemical pathways in Meloidogyne incognita in response to non-fumigant nematicides

Meloidogyne incognita is a destructive and economically important agricultural pest. Similar to other plant-parasitic nematodes, management of M. incognita relies heavily on chemical controls. As old, broad spectrum, and toxic nematicides leave the market, replacements have entered including fluensulfone, fluazaindolizine, and fluopyram that are plant-parasitic nematode specific in target and less toxic to applicators. However, there is limited research into their modes-of-action and other off-target cellular effects caused by these nematicides in plant-parasitic nematodes. This study aimed to broaden the knowledge about these new nematicides by examining the transcriptional changes in M. incognita second-stage juveniles (J2) after 24-h exposure to fluensulfone, fluazaindolizine, and fluopyram as well as oxamyl, an older non-fumigant nematicide. Total RNA was extracted and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq to investigate transcriptional changes in the citric acid cycle, the glyoxylate pathway, upbeta-fatty acid oxidation pathway, oxidative phosphorylation, and acetylcholine neuron components. Observed transcriptional changes in M. incognita exposed to fluopyram and oxamyl corresponded to their respective modes-of-action. Potential targets for fluensulfone and fluazaindolizine were identified in the upbeta-fatty acid oxidation pathway and 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase of the citric acid cycle, respectively. This study provides a foundation for understanding how potential nematicide resistance could develop, identifies cellular pathways as potential nematicide targets, and determines targets for confirming unknown modes-of-action.

Sensitivity of Meloidogyne enterolobii and M. incognita to fluorinated nematicides.

Meloidogyne enterolobii (Yang and Eisenback) was recently introduced into Louisiana on contaminated sweetpotato planting material. Given the known variation in sensitivity to nematicides within the genus Meloidogyne, there is question as to whether fluorinated nematicides will be as efficacious toward M. enterolobii as they are with M. incognita (Chitwood). Using a series of in vitro and growth cabinet experiments, this study compared the sensitivity of M. enterolobii and M. incognita to four synthetic non-fumigant nematicides (fluopyram, fluensulfone, fluazaindolizine, and oxamyl). Meloidogyne enterolobii had lower sensitivity to nematicides than M. incognita in the majority of the in vitro exposure assays. Similar levels of reduction in root infectivity were observed after nematicide exposure among both nematode species. Fluopyram showed high hatching inhibition for both Meloidogyne species at low concentrations [median effective concentration (EC50 ) values of 0.273 to 0.018 mg L-1 ], whereas fluensulfone showed high root penetration inhibition at low concentrations (EC50 values of 0.151 to 0.065 mg L-1 ) relative to that of other evaluated nematicides. For both Meloidogyne species, each of the four non-fumigant nematicides reduced root galling (58-96% reduction for M. enterolobii, 71-100% reduction for M. incognita) and egg production (63-99% reduction for M. enterolobii, 58-96% reduction for M. incognita) on sweetpotato when applied at the label recommended rate. Fluorinated nematicides and oxamyl show capacity to suppress M. enterolobii on sweetpotato. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

Management of Meloidogyne incognita on Cucumber with a New Nonfumigant Nematicide Fluopimomide.

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is an economically important vegetable crop in China. Southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) is a significant obstacle in cucumber production, causing severe root damage and yield losses. Moreover, resistance development to fosthiazate, and poor mobility of abamectin, have led to failure to control this nematode. It is of great interest to growers and the vegetable industry to explore novel nonfumigant nematicides that can provide adequate control in an environmentally friendly manner. Fluopimomide (FM), a new chemical having a similar structure to fluopyram, was shown to exhibit toxic effects on fungi and nematodes. The efficacy of FM to reduce infection of M. incognita in cucumber was evaluated under greenhouse and field conditions. In the greenhouse, FM at all test rates resulted in a 22.5 to 39.6% and 31.3 to 55.0% reduction in the population density of M. incognita in the soil at 30 and 60 days after treatment (DAT), respectively, compared with the nontreated control. FM at 500 and 750 g ha-1 reduced (P < 0.05) root galling, meanwhile increasing plant height compared with the nontreated control at 30 and 60 DAT. In the field trials, FM at 500 and 750 g ha-1 decreased the population density of M. incognita and root galling 57.2 to 69.9% compared with the untreated control, while enhancing cucumber yield in two consecutive years. Furthermore, FM at 500 g ha-1 combined with fosthiazate was the most effective treatment showing a synergistic effect on reducing population densities of M. incognita, which was significantly greater than either FM or fosthiazate by themselves. In summary, FM has considerable potential for managing M. incognita on cucumber.