We live on a huge sphere. When the sum of interior angles in a triangle is greater than [Formula: see text] and each point has a different local vertical, we must use spherical geometry. Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries are non-equivalent systems, with their own premises and completely different foundations. The use of any logic and tool from orthogonal into non-orthogonal realities (and vice versa), leads to big errors. Newtonian concepts are treated as absolutes in classical mechanics. Content analysis shows that even recent physics publications have inadmissible distortions in the description of natural phenomena in the domain of classical mechanics, inherited through the utilization of the Euclidean model. The whole objective reality has been presented using the tools of Euclidean geometry. When we use the tools of spherical geometry to examine the same phenomena, we get very different findings. The Law of conservation of energy appears as the most efficient tool for the evaluation of these significantly different findings. It confirms the validity of the new discoveries presented in this paper and gives legitimacy to the whole project! Classical mechanics becomes more consistent with the conservation laws of Physics, and the subject’s coherence is lifted to a significantly higher level.
Read full abstract