Non-dormant Barley Research Articles

The Interrelationship between Abscisic Acid and Reactive Oxygen Species Plays a Key Role in Barley Seed Dormancy and Germination.

Seed dormancy is one of the adaptive responses in the plant life cycle and an important agronomic trait. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) release seed dormancy and promote seed germination in several cereal crops; however, the key regulatory mechanism of ROS-mediated seed dormancy and germination remains controversial. Here, we focused on the relationship between hydrogen peroxide (a ROS) and abscisic acid (ABA) in dormant and non-dormant barley seeds. The hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) level produced in barley seed embryos after imbibition was higher in non-dormant seeds than in dormant seeds. H2O2 regulated the ABA content in the embryos through ABA-8′-hydroxylase, an ABA catabolic enzyme. Moreover, compared with non-dormant seeds, in dormant seeds the activity of NADPH oxidase, which produces ROS, was lower, whereas the activity of catalase, which is a H2O2 scavenging enzyme, was higher, as was the expression of HvCAT2. Furthermore, precocious germination of isolated immature embryos was suppressed by the transient introduction of HvCAT2 driven by the maize (Zea mays) ubiquitin promoter. HvCAT2 expression was regulated through an ABA-responsive transcription factor (HvABI5) induced by ABA. These results suggest that the changing of balance between ABA and ROS is active in barley seed embryos after imbibition and regulates barley seed dormancy and germination.

Effects of dormancy-breaking chemicals on ABA levels in barley grain embryos

AbstractThe endogenous ABA contents of dormant and nondormant barley grains were determined following application of different compounds to break dormancy. The chemicals used for breaking of dormancy in intact dormant grains were weak and strong acids, alcohols, hydrogen peroxide, cyanide, nitrate, salicylic acid, gibberellic acid and fusicoccin. The dormancy-breaking compounds could be classified into two major groups: compounds that caused a decrease in endogenous ABA (class I) and compounds which did not affect endogenous ABA (class II). Class I compounds included gibberellic acid, ethanol, hydrogen peroxide, nitrate, salicylic acid; class II compounds were fusicoccin, acid (H2SO4), sodium azide, n-caproic acid. In addition, these dormancy-breaking compounds were able to stimulate the germination rate when applied to embryos isolated from dormant grains. The concentrations necessary for stimulation of germination of isolated embryos were much lower than the concentrations for breaking the dormancy of intact grains. After embryos were isolated from dormant grains and incubated in water, ABA was determined in both embryos and in the incubation media. The class I compounds stated above also reduced ABA content in the incubation medium of isolated embryos, while class II compounds had no effect on ABA content of the medium. External application of ABA could overcome the effect of dormancy-breaking compounds of class I but not of class II. The results suggest that in the presence of the agents belonging to class II, ABA responsiveness of isolated embryos from dormant grains is decreased, compared to nontreated embryos.

Dormant Barley Aleurone Shows Heterogeneity and a Specific Cytodifferentiation

In response to gibberellic acid, aleurone layers isolated from dormant barley (Hordeum distichumL. cv. Triumph) kernels produced significantly lessalpha-amylase than aleurones from non-dormant kernels. Light microscopical investigations using the dye acridine orange as well as electron microscopical studies showed that the relatively lowalpha-amylase production by aleurones from dormant kernels appears to be due to the majority of the cells remaining quiescent after GA3incubation. The cells that did show ultrastructural signs of GA3-induced activation occurred in clusters that spanned all three cell layers of the dormant aleurone. These cells showed a characteristic ultrastructure, which was different from that described previously for GA3incubated non-dormant aleurone layers. Dictyosomes, which are extremely difficult to visualise in non-dormant barley aleurone, were abundant. The presence ofalpha-amylase in the Golgi could be demonstrated by immuno-gold labelling in these cells. Remarkably, most endosperm-facing aleurone cells in the activated clusters showed no cell wall degradation. This cytodifferentiation pattern could be mimicked in aleurone cells from non-dormant grains by imbibition of the grains in abscisic acid (ABA) prior to GA3incubation. These data support the notion of heterogeneity of aleurone cells with respect to GA3sensitivity, and suggest that ABA is involved in the impaired GA3response of aleurone cells from dormant barley.

Different properties of the inward rectifying potassium conductance of aleurone protoplasts from dormant and non-dormant barley grains

Isogenic dormant and non-dormant barley grains provide a useful system to study the molecular mechanisms of grain dormancy and the role of plant hormones in this process. As ion fluxes are associated with dormancy-related plant hormone responses, we compared the properties of the inward rectifying potassium conductance in aleurone protoplasts isolated from dormant and non-dormant Triumph grains and in germinating Himalaya grains. Maximal conductance, voltage dependency of steady-state activation, activation and deactivation kinetics were studied in the whole-cell patch-clamp configuration. Activation and deactivation time courses were single exponential. No differences in the above described properties were found between the protoplasts isolated from non-dormant Triumph and Himalaya grains. However, the maximal conductance (corrected for cell size) in protoplasts from dormant Triumph grains was much smaller (65%), and activation time constants were much larger as compared to protoplasts from non-dormant grains. No differences were found in the deactivation kinetics in the three different types of protoplasts. The half-maximal activation potential was slightly more negative in protoplasts from dormant grains than from non-dormant grains.

Modulation of germination of embryos isolated from dormant and nondormant barley grains by manipulation of endogenous abscisic acid

Dormant and non-dormant barley (Hordeum distichum L.) grains with identical genetic backgrounds were obtained by maturing grains under different climate conditions. When isolated embryos from dormant grains were incubated in a well containing a fixed volume of water (300 μl), the germination rate and percentage were dependent on the embryo number per well. A higher embryo number per well was correlated with a lower germination rate and percentage. However, this was not the case for the embryos isolated from nondormant grains. During germination, the endogenous cis-abscisic acid (ABA) in isolated embryos from both dormant and nondormant grains was analyzed. The inhibitory effect on germination of a higher number per well of isolated dormant embryos was due to diffusion of endogenous ABA out of the embryos and accumulation of ABA in the incubation medium. Moreover, there was de-novo synthesis of ABA in embryos isolated from dormant grains during incubation but not in embryos isolated from nondormant grains. The inhibitory effect of ABA on germination of embryos isolated from dormant grains could be mimicked by addition of ABA or the medium in which dormant embryos had been placed. Embryos isolated from nondormant grains were insensitive to addition of ABA and medium from dormant embryos. Our results demonstrate that diffusion of endogenous ABA, de-novo ABA synthesis and ABA sensitivity play a role in the control of germination. It is proposed that dormancy-breaking treatments act via changes to these processes.

Characterisation of Isolated Aleurone Layers from Dormant and Non-dormant Barley Grains by Direct Chemical Ionisation Pyrolysis Mass Spectrometry

Abstract Direct chemical ionisation pyrolysis mass spectrometry was applied to differentiate isolated aleurone layers from dormant and non-dormant barley grains of identical genotypes. Unsupervised discriminant analysis showed that non-dormant aleurone layers had characteristic chemical properties that distinguished them from dormant aleurone layers. This discrimination was based mainly on different relative abundances of di- and triglycerides and pentose- and hexose-containing oligosaccharides.

Abscisic acid and gibberellic acid‐regulated responses of embryos and aleurone layers isolated from dormant and nondormant barley grains

Dormant and nondormant isogenic barley grains were obtained by maturing grains under short day (SD) or long day (LD) growth conditions, respectively. Hormonal responses of isolated embryos and aleurone layers from these grains were studied. Addition of abscisic acid (ABA) reduced germination rate and percentage of embryos, and induced Rab (ABA‐responsive) mRNA in aleurone layers from both types of grain. Embryos and aleurone layers from dormant grains responded stronger to ABA than those from nondormant grains. Gibberellic acid (GA3) increased the germination rate and percentage of embryos from dormant grains and counteracted the ABA‐induced inhibition of embryo germination. GA3 did not affect the amount of Rab mRNA in aleurone layers, suggesting that expression of the Rab gene has no direct correlation with germination. The stronger response of embryos and aleurone layers from dormant grains to ABA may not be explained by higher endogenous ABA levels, but might be due to differences in hormone signal transduction. Aleurone protoplasts from dormant grains had a higher cytosolic pH than those from nondormant grains. To inhibit the ABA‐induced Rab mRNA, a much higher concentration of weak acid was required for aleurone layers from dormant grains than for those from nondormant grains. A possible difference in ABA signal transduction between dormant and nondormant grains is discussed.

Abscisic acid and gibberellic acid-regulated responses of embryos and aleurone layers isolated from dormant and nondormant barley grains

Abscisic acid and gibberellic acid-regulated responses of embryos and aleurone layers isolated from dormant and nondormant barley grains

Developmental and organ-specific expression of an ABA- and stress-induced protein in barley.

An mRNA species, HVA1, has been shown to be rapidly induced by abscisic acid (ABA) in barley aleurone layers (Hong, Uknes and Ho, Plant Mol Biol 11: 495-506, 1988). In the current work we have investigated the expression of HVA1 in other organs of barley plants. In developing seeds, HVA1 mRNA is not detected in starchy endosperm cells, yet it accumulates in aleurone layers and embryo starting 25 days after anthesis, and its level remains high in these organs in dry seeds. Although the levels of HVA1 mRNA are equivalent in the dry embryos of dormant and nondormant barley seeds, upon imbibition HVA1 mRNA declines much slower in the dormant than in the nondormant embryos. The HVA1 mRNA and protein levels are highly induced by ABA treatment in all organs of 3-day-old seedlings. However, the induction in the leaf of 7-day-old seedlings is less than one tenth the level observed in the leaf of 3-day-old seedlings. In the leaf, HVA1 mRNA and protein are induced mainly at the base. These observations indicate that the expression of HVA1 is under developmental regulation. Besides the HVA1 protein, a smaller protein (p20) of approximately 20 kDa cross-reacting with anti-HVA1 polyclonal antibodies, is induced by ABA in barley seedlings but not in seeds. HVA1 mRNA is induced by drought, NaCl, cold or heat treatment. Similar to ABA treatment, the drought induction of HVA1 occurs in all the tissues of 3-day-old seedlings, but the induction decreases dramatically in the leaf of 7-day-old plants. The significance of organ-specific, developmentally regulated, and stress-induced expression of HVA1 is discussed.

THE INTERACTION OF DORMANCY AND WATER-SENSITIVITY OF BARLEY WITH TEMPERATURE

Newly-harvested Scotch barley was dried and put into storage at 90, 100, 110 and 120° F. One sample at each temperature was cooled at a slow rate (2° F./week) and one at a fast rate (2° F/day). The loss of dormancy and water-sensitivity was followed throughout the drying and storage periods. Dormancy and water-sensitivity were lost most rapidly at high drying and storage temperatures. The optimum drying and storage conditions produced a non-water-sensitive, non-dormant barley within 14 days of harvest. Calculation of regression coefficients for percentage loss of dormancy and water-sensitivity per day at average storage temperatures enabled activation energies to be calculated for the two processes. These were 17·5 and 18·3 kcal/mole respectively. Two very similar processes are therefore involved in dormancy and water-sensitivity and their removal.