Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures Research Articles

Clinical study on the incidence of femoral head posterior tilt angle in non-displaced femoral neck fractures

To investigate the occurrence of posterior femoral head tilt after clinical non-displaced femoral neck fracture, and to provide a reference basis for clinical surgery and improvement of disease prognosis. Total of 165 patients with non-displaced femoral neck fractures of Garden typeⅠandⅡfrom January 2018 to June 2022 were selected as study subjects including 48 males and 117 females, with an average age of (71.5±8.5) years old ranging from 53 to 89, involving 97 cases of typeⅠand 68 of typeⅡ. On the patient's preoperative sagittal or axial CT film of the hip, the angle formed by the radius line of the femoral head and the midline of the femoral neck was used as the posterior tilt angle of the femoral head (α), and the posterior tilt femoral head angle was measured using the method proposed by Palm. The measured data were divided into 6 groups:α<0°, 0°<α< 5°, 5°≤α<10°, 10°≤α<15°, 15°≤α<20°, α≥20°, and the incidence of different ranges of posterior tilt angle was compared. The sex composition ratio of 165 patients were analyzed and compared, and the age of 65 was used as the cut-off point to compare the incidence of fractures between genders. Patients were divided into the posterior tilt <20° group for 135 cases and the posterior tilt ≥20°group for 30 cases according to the preoperative posterior tilt angle, the differences between two groups in terms of gender and age were analyzed. Among 165 patients with non-displaced femoral neck fractures, 143 cases with poaterior tilt of the femoral head occurred with an incidence of 86.7%. Posterior tilt 0°<α<5° accounted for 36 cases with an incidence of 21.8%;5°≤α<10° accounted for 40 cases with an incidence of 24.2%;10°≤α<15° accounted for 27 cases with an incidence of 16.4%;15°≤α<20° accounted for 10 cases with an incidence of 6.1%;posterior tilt angle α≥20° accounted for 30 cases, the incidence was 18.2%, of which the maximum posterior tilt angle was 42.7°. Statistical analysis showed that the percentage of fractures in the 165 patients selected for this study was significantly higher in female than in male, and that the female group was more likely to have fractures before the age of 65 years compared to the male group. However, gender, age and fracture subtypes (GardenⅠ, Ⅱ) were not influential factors for femoral neck fractures with a preoperative posterior femoral head tilt angle >20°(P>0.05). The incidence of femoral head posterior tile in non-displaced femoral neck fractures is relatively high, in which severe posterior tile occurs, and the femoral head posterior tile angle≥20° can reach 18.2%. In patients with closed reduction internal fixation, the fracture end needs to be repositioned as much as possible to reduce the risk of postoperative avascular necrosis of the femoral head. In order to prevent femoral neck fractures, special attention should be paid to anti-osteoporosis treatment for female. Preoperative assessment of posterior tilt is critical for patients of different ages, genders and fracture subtypes (GardenⅠ, Ⅱ).

Cannulated screws fixation for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: early versus late weight-bearing-a prospective analysis.

Nondisplaced intracapsular fractures (Garden I/II) are predominantly treated with an internal fixation technique. The purpose of the study is to identify the best rehabilitation protocol after internal fixation with 3 parallel cannulated screws. All patients operated on from 2016 to 2021 for femoral neck fractures by internal fixation with 3 cannulated screws were enrolled into this prospective study. The population was divided into two groups: Group A (n = 34) who followed a postoperative rehabilitation protocol involving full and immediate loading, and Group B (n = 22) who followed a postoperative rehabilitation protocol involving late full loading (after 30days). The two groups were compared with each other by mortality rate, postoperative complications and need for re-interventions. Functional outcome and quality of life were assessed at the minimum follow-up of 1year using the modified Harris Hip Score(HHS) and the Short form health survey (SF-12) questionnaire. Group A showed a lower complication rate (2.9% vs. 18.2%), a lower 1-year mortality rate (5.9% vs. 9.1%), a better perception of mental health status (SF12-MCS 56.2 vs. 51.4, p = 0.03) but a worse perception of one's physical health status (SF12-PCS 48.1 vs. 56.7, p < 0.01). The two groups were also statistically overlapping in terms of the functional outcome achieved after the intervention (HHS was 90.94 in Group A vs. 93.15 in Group B, p = 0.32). Postoperative complications, mortality and revision rate were higher in patients who followed a late-loaded rather than early loaded rehabilitation protocol. Functional outcome at 1-year survival is not significantly different. In nondisplaced intracapsular hip fractures treated with cannulated screws, an immediate full load should be preferred. Query.

Development and validation of a deep-learning model for the detection of non-displaced femoral neck fractures with anteroposterior and lateral hip radiographs.

Hip fractures, including femoral neck fractures, are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and are typically diagnosed using plain radiography. However, diagnosing non-displaced femoral neck fractures can be challenging due to their subtle appearance on hip radiographs. Previous deep-learning models have shown low accuracy in identifying these fractures on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs; however, no studies have used lateral radiographs. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of using deep-learning with both AP and lateral hip radiographs to automatically identify non-displaced femoral neck fractures. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with femoral neck fractures at The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University. All the hip radiographs were reviewed, and cases of non-displaced femoral neck fractures were included in the study. Additionally, 439 participants with normal hip radiographs were also included in the study. A vision transformer (Vit) model was developed using 1,536 AP and lateral hip radiograph. The model's performance was compared to the performance of two groups of human observers: an expert group comprising orthopedic surgeons and radiologists, and a non-expert group, including emergency physicians and general practice doctors. We also carried out the external validation using two additional data sets to assess the generalizability of the model. The Vit model showed exceptional performance in detecting non-displaced femoral neck fractures on paired AP and lateral hip radiographs, achieving a binary accuracy of 95.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 94.9%, 96.8%] and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.988. Compared to the human observers, the model had a higher accuracy of 96.7% (95% CI: 93.9%, 99.5%) on the paired AP and lateral hip radiographs, while the accuracy of the expert group was 90.5% (95% CI: 85.7%, 95.2%). Further, the model maintained good performance during the external validation, with an AUC of 0.959 on the paired AP and lateral views. Our Vit model showed expert-level performance in identifying non-displaced femoral neck fractures on paired AP and lateral hip radiographs. This model has the potential to enhance diagnosis accuracy and improve patient outcomes by reducing the need for additional examinations and preoperative time.

Management of Garden-I and II Femoral Neck Fractures: Perspectives on Primary Arthroplasty.

This review compares internal fixation versus arthroplasty in the treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) calling attention to evolving areas of consensus that influence clinical decision-making. The Garden classification system, typically dichotomized into nondisplaced (types I and II) and displaced (types III and IV) fractures, has been used as a guide for surgical decision-making. Conventionally, treatment of nondisplaced FNF in the elderly has been with internal fixation, and treatment of a displaced FNF has been hemi-, or more recently total hip, arthroplasty. Studies over the last decade have raised concern over the appropriate treatment of nondisplaced FNFs due to high rates of reoperation of nondisplaced FNFs treated with internal fixation. Avascular necrosis (AVN), failure of internal fixation, secondary malunion, and pin/nail penetration through the femoral head have all been observed. Several studies have attributed fixation failure to a degree of femoral neck tilt ≥20°, either posteriorly or anteriorly as seen on the lateral X-ray. Because of these observations of fixation failures, the suggestion has been made that arthroplasty be used when the degree of posterior tilt exceeds a threshold of ≥20° tilt with the expectation of diminishing failure of fixation, decreasing the risk of reoperation and preserving function without increasing mortality rate. Frustrating additional analyses are uncertainties over the mechanisms of failure of internal fixation with ≥20° tilt and the persistently substantial 1-year mortality rate after FNF, which has not been influenced by fixation or replacement type. Due to the lack of consensus regarding the determination of the appropriate surgical intervention for nondisplaced FNFs, an improved algorithm for surgical decision-making for these fractures may prove useful.

Hemiarthroplasty vs. internal fixation for nondisplaced femoral neck fracture in mainland China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Nondisplaced femoral neck fractures constitute a substantial portion of these injuries. The optimal treatment strategy between internal fixation (IF) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) remains debated, particularly concerning cost-effectiveness. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov decision model to compare HA and IF in treating nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients in China. The analysis was performed from a payer perspective with a 5-year time horizon. Costs were measured in 2020 USD, and effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and probabilistic analyses, were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. The willingness-to-pay threshold for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was set at $11,083/QALY following the Chinese gross domestic product in 2020. HA demonstrated higher cumulative QALYs (2.94) compared to IF (2.75) but at a higher total cost ($13,324 vs. $12,167), resulting in an ICER of $6,128.52/QALY. The one-way sensitivity analysis identified the costs of HA and IF as the most influential factors. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that HA was more effective in 69.3% of simulations, with an ICER below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $11,083 in 58.8% of simulations. HA is a cost-effective alternative to IF for treating nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients in mainland China.

Postoperative Valgus Deformity and Progression of Ostheoarthritis in Non-Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Nondisplaced femoral neck fractures have traditionally been treated with in situ fixation. However, poor surgical and clinical outcomes have been reported for fractures with valgus deformity >15°, and the reduction of valgus impaction has recently been emphasized. In addition, early degenerative osteoarthritis can be caused by cam-type femoroacetabular impingement after healing of femoral neck fractures. This study was designed with the objective of confirming the difference in progression of radiographic osteoarthritis according to the severity of the valgus deformity. Patients who underwent internal fixation using multiple cannulateld screws for management of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures were divided into two groups: high valgus group (postoperative valgus angle ≥15°) and low valgus group (postoperative valgus angle <15°). Evaluation of demographic data and changes in the joint space width from the immediate postoperative period to the latest follow-up was performed. A significant decrease in joint space width in both hip joints was observed in the high valgus group when compared with the low valgus group, including cases with an initial valgus angle less than 15° and those corrected to less than 15° of valgus by reduction. No complications requiring surgical treatment were observed in either group; however, two cases of avascular necrosis, one in each group, which developed in the low valgus group after reduction of the fracture, were followed for observation. Performing in situ fixation in cases involving a valgus deformity ≥15° in non-displaced femoral neck fractures may cause accelerated narrowing of the hip joint space.

A Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Method for Accurate Detection of Early Nondisplaced Fractures of the Femoral Neck.

Nondisplaced femoral neck fractures are sometimes misdiagnosed by radiographs, which may deteriorate into displaced fractures. However, few efficient artificial intelligent methods have been reported. We developed an automatic detection method using deep learning networks to pinpoint femoral neck fractures on radiographs to assist physicians in making an accurate diagnosis in the first place. Our proposed accurate automatic detection method, called the direction-aware fracture-detection network (DAFDNet), consists of two steps, namely region-of-interest (ROI) segmentation and fracture detection. The first step removes the noise region and pinpoints the femoral neck region. The fracture-detection step uses a direction-aware deep learning algorithm to mark the exact femoral neck fracture location in the region detected in the first step. A total of 3840 femoral neck parts in anterior-posterior (AP) pelvis radiographs collected from the China Medical University Hospital database were used to test our method. The simulation results showed that DAFDNet outperformed the U-Net and DenseNet methods in terms of the IOU value, Dice value, and Jaccard value. Our proposed DAFDNet demonstrated over 94.8% accuracy in differentiating non-displaced Garden type I and type II femoral neck fracture cases. Our DAFDNet method outperformed the diagnostic accuracy of general practitioners and orthopedic surgeons in accurately locating Garden type I and type II fracture locations. This study can determine the feasibility of applying artificial intelligence in a clinical setting and how the use of deep learning networks assists physicians in improving correct diagnoses compared to the current traditional orthopedic manual assessments.

Comparison of percutaneous compression plate to parallel screws in the treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a prospective, randomized study.

The optimal internal fixation for non-displaced femoral neck fractures remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical results of the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) with parallel screws (PS) in treating femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. A total of 218 patients who underwent internal fixation were randomized to receive either a percutaneous compression plate (PCCP group) or parallel screws (PS group) using a computerized random sequence generator which was used to assign the order of randomization. Patients were assessed by the operating time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin level drop, postoperative hospital stay, the time to full weight-bearing, reduction quality, fracture healing time, Harris hip score, and postoperative complications. There was no significant difference between PCCP and PS groups regarding operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin level drop, postoperative hospital stays, reduction quality, and Harris hip score (p > 0.05). The time to full weight-bearing and the fracture healing time in the PCCP group were shorter than those in the PS group (p < 0.05). The overall complication rates were slightly lower in the PCCP compared to the PS patients, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). However, the implant failure rate was significantly higher in the PS group compared to the PCCP group (p < 0.05). The present study suggests that the PCCP is superior to the parallel screws fixation in the treatment of non-displaced elderly femoral neck fractures in terms of earlier full weight-bearing, shorter fracture healing time, and lower implant failure rate. Therefore, it may be a better therapeutic strategy for non-displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients.

Our aim was to determine the best operative procedure in human participants with a displaced or non-displaced femoral neck fracture comparing cannulated screw (CS) fixation, dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of surgical and functional outcomes, reoperation and postoperative complications. We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, CINAHL, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs up to 31 July 2022. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed to assess the comparative effects of the four operative procedures, using fixed-effects and random-effects models. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for continuous variables and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated for binary variables. A total of 33 RCTs with 5703 patients were included in our network meta-analysis. CS fixation was best in terms of operation time (CS: MD = - 57.70, 95% CI - 72.78; - 42.62; DHS: MD = - 53.56, 95% CI - 76.17; - 30.95; HA: MD = - 20.90, 95% CI - 30.65; - 11.15; THA: MD = 1.00 reference) and intraoperative blood loss (CS: MD = - 3.67, 95% CI - 4.44; - 2.90; DHS: MD = - 3.20, 95% CI - 4.97; - 1.43; HA: MD = - 1.20, 95% CI - 1.73; - 0.67; THA: MD = 1.00 reference). In life quality and functional outcome, measured at different time points with EQ-5D and the Harris Hip Score (HHS), THA ranked first and HA second (e.g. EQ-5D 2years postoperatively: CS: MD = - 0.20, 95% CI - 0.29; - 0.11; HA: MD = - 0.09, 95% CI - 0.17; - 0.02; THA: MD = 1.00 reference; HHS 2years postoperatively: CS: MD = - 5.50, 95% CI - 9.98; - 1.03; DHS: MD = - 8.93, 95% CI - 15.08; - 2.78; HA: MD = - 3.65, 95% CI - 6.74; - 0.57; THA: MD = 1.00 reference). CS fixation had the highest reoperation risk, followed by DHS fixation, HA, and THA (CS: OR = 9.98, 95% CI 4.60; 21.63; DHS: OR = 5.07, 95% CI 2.15; 11.96; HA: OR = 1.60, 95% CI 0.89; 2.89; THA: OR = 1.00 reference). In our cohort of patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures, HHS, EQ-5D, and reoperation risk showed an advantage of THA and HA compared with CS and DHS fixation. Based on these findings, we recommend that hip arthroplasty should be preferred and internal fixation of femoral neck fractures should only be considered in individual cases. a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PROSPERO on 10 August 2022 (CRD42022350293).

A three-dimensional measurement study of fracture displacement in Garden I femoral neck fracture: a retrospective study

BackgroundGarden I femoral neck fractures are nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. Nonoperative treatment and in situ fixation are the preferred treatments. However, the postoperative outcome is not satisfactory and the incidence of complications remains high, which raises doubts about the accuracy of the diagnosis of nondisplaced Garden I fractures. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction has been reported as a mature technology for reconstructing the bone structure of patients. We further extended this technique in the measurement of the fracture spatial displacement to verify the accuracy of Garden I femoral neck fractures.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of patients with Garden I femoral neck fractures from January 2013 to December 2018 at our institution, who were included according to specified criteria. A bilateral proximal femur model of each patient was established based on computed tomography (CT) data. The displacement of the deepest portion of the femoral head fovea, the displacement of the center of the femoral head and the rotation of the femoral head were measured in the bilateral model.ResultsA total of 102 patients diagnosed with Garden I fractures were included in this study. The cohort included 32 men and 70 women, with an average age of 55.88 ± 15.32 years. In these patients, the average displacement of the deepest portion of the femoral head fovea was 16.43 ± 7.69 mm. The minimum and maximum displacement was 3.58 and 44.32 mm, respectively. The average displacement of the center of the femoral head was 10.39 ± 5.47 mm and ranged from 2.16 to 34.42 mm. The rotational angle was 23.81 ± 10.15 ° and ranged from 3.71 ° to 61.19 °.ConclusionsGarden I fractures have large spatial displacement and cannot be considered incomplete or nondisplaced fractures. Therefore, we suggest that anatomical reduction should be considered during treatment.

FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, ANATOMICAL DESCRIPTION, MECHANISM OF ACTION, CLASSIFICATION, CLINICAL EVALUATION, IMAGING EVALUATION, TREATMENT AND COMPLICATIONS

Introduction: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are frequent and devastating injuries in orthopedics and traumatology. It usually has several therapeutic options depending on the type of fracture and the comorbidities of the affected individual, among the conservative treatment alternatives are bed rest with or without traction and among the surgical alternatives are internal fixation. Objective: to detail the current information related to femoral neck fractures, epidemiology, anatomical description, mechanism of action, classification, clinical evaluation, imaging evaluation, treatment and complications. Methodology: a total of 40 articles were analyzed in this review, including review and original articles, as well as clinical cases, of which 31 bibliographies were used because the other articles were not relevant to this study. The sources of information were PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane; the terms used to search for information in Spanish, Portuguese and English were: fractures, femur, femoral neck, prosthesis, trauma. Results: 80% are generated in women, and the incidence doubles every 5 to 6 years in women over 30 years of age. It presents bimodal incidence. The risk factors are female sex, white race, advanced age, poor health, smoking, alcohol consumption, previous fractures, history of falls and low estrogen concentrations. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the test of choice for the diagnosis of undisplaced or occult fractures not observable on plain radiographs. Up to 40% of impacted or nondisplaced fractures will displace if they do not undergo internal fixation. Secondary displacement is 5% following internal fixation. Pseudarthrosis may complicate up to 5% of non-displaced fractures and up to 25% of displaced fractures; furthermore, osteonecrosis complicates up to 10% of non-displaced fractures and up to 30% of displaced fractures. Conclusions: femoral neck fractures present a high incidence, the mechanism of action mostly presented in young people is high energy trauma, in the elderly the most common mechanism is low energy falls. Patients with displaced femoral neck fractures are unable to walk and show shortening and external rotation of the lower limb. Anteroposterior projections of the pelvis are indicated, as well as anteroposterior and cross lateral projections of the affected proximal femur. The goals of treatment are to relieve the patients pain, restore hip function and have rapid mobilization through anatomical reduction and internal fixation or by prosthetic replacement. Conservative treatment of fractures is recommended in individuals at extreme surgical risk; it can also be considered in individuals with dementia, who do not maintain the ability to walk and have little symptomatology due to hip pain. Among the most important complications are pseudarthrosis and osteonecrosis. Surgery to treat nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is associated with a higher number of consolidation and associated with less avascular necrosis compared to conservative treatment. KEY WORDS: fractures, femoral neck, trauma, prosthesis.

Complications and Outcomes of the Internal Fixation of Non-displaced Femoral Neck Fracture in Old Patients: A Two-Year Follow-Up.

Background Fractures of the proximal femur are amongst the most common injuries in the elderly population. While there is a clear consensus regarding the management of displaced femoral neck fractures, the management of non-displaced fractures is less clear. Both fixation and arthroplasty are valid treatment options. Internal fixation is a less invasive procedure, but it carries the risks of non-union and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. The literature describes varying complication rates associated with these risks. We aim to describe a series of elderly patients above the age of 65 years with non-displaced fractures of the femoral neck who were treated with internal fixation. Our objectives are to determine the union rate and complications in this group and to elucidate the factors that influence these outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all patients aged 65 years and older who presented with femoral neck fractures at our level 1 trauma unit between 2018 and 2020. Fractures were classified using the Garden classification system, and only those with Garden 1 or 2 fractures (non-displaced) were included. Preoperative radiographs or intraoperative fluoroscopy images were used to classify fractures using the Pauwels classification. Serial postoperative radiographs and clinical notes (up to 24 months postoperatively) were reviewed to assess the union rate and the development of complications. Both non-union and AVN were analysed for their associations with age, sex, Pauwels grade and comorbidities. A subgroup analysis of the complications was performed to elucidate their association with age groups (<80 and >80 years) and types of fixations (dynamic hip screws {DHS} and cannulated screws). Results A total of 148 patients, consisting of 60 males and 88 females, were included in the analysis. The patients had a mean age of 78.5 years (ranging from 65 to 98 years). The union rate without any degree of AVN was 90.7%, with six non-unions (4.05%) and six patients experiencing AVN (4.05%). No difference in outcome was detected between the two groups based on age. High (type 2 or 3) Pauwels grade (p = 0.05) and treatment with cannulated screws (p = 0.02) were indicated as significant factors for non-union. All patients who developed AVN were noted to have a comorbidity that is known to predispose them to AVN. Conclusion Our series shows a union rate of 90.7%, which is comparable to the union rates reported in other published literature. Our results suggest that age does not independently influence the outcome of fixation for these fractures. We conclude that fractures with vertical orientation (Pauwels grade 2 or 3), when treated with cannulated screws, are more likely to result in non-union. AVN is the second most common complication after non-union, which is also associated with other risk factors for AVN.

Relation entre la densité minérale osseuse du fémur proximal et l’instabilité des fractures fémorales proximales : étude rétrospective

BackgroundProximal femoral fractures can occur in patients with osteoporosis. However, the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur and fracture type and instability remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether there is a relationship between the site-specific BMD of the proximal femur and the instability of proximal femoral fracture. HypothesisThe instability of proximal femoral fractures is related to the site-specific BMD of the proximal femur. Patients and methodsUsing dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), the BMD on the non-fractured side was retrospectively examined in 252 women who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture at our hospital. The BMD was measured at three sites: the femoral neck (neck), trochanter (trochanter), and intertrochanteric region (inter). The BMD at several sites was compared between the femoral neck and trochanteric fractures. Femoral neck fractures were classified into the displaced and non-displaced types, and trochanteric fractures were classified into stable and unstable types. A comparative analysis was conducted for each proximal femur site and fracture type. ResultsBoth total and site-specific BMDs were lower in trochanteric fractures than in femoral neck fractures. No difference was observed between BMD and displaced or non-displaced femoral neck fractures. However, the BMD of the intertrochanteric region was lower in unstable trochanteric fractures (0.57±0.12g/cm2) than in stable trochanteric fractures (0.61±0.11g/cm2) [p<0.05]. DiscussionSeveral factors, including the patient's age and the bone component of each region, may influence the lower BMD in trochanteric fractures. In trochanteric fractures, the site-specific BMD of the proximal femur may predict the type of fracture and the degree of instability, especially in those with low BMD at the intertrochanteric site. The study findings suggest that a decrease in the BMD of the intertrochanteric region of femoral trochanteric fractures, which is thought to be involved in instability, is associated with fracture-type instability. Level of evidenceIII, retrospective study.

Internal Fixation Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

To compare internal fixation (IF) versus hemiarthroplasty (HA) for elderly individuals (ie, older than 65 years) with nondisplaced (ie, Garden type I or II) femoral neck fracture (FNF). We searched English literature of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from inception to December 4, 2021. Eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared IF versus HA for elderly individuals with nondisplaced FNF. Primary outcomes were Harris hip score (HHS), quality of life per European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and mortality. Secondary outcomes were complications, reoperation, intraoperative bleeding, operation duration, and length of hospital stay. Two authors separately extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Three RCTs yielding 400 patients were enrolled, of which 203 (50.7%) underwent IF. Internal fixation was inferior to HA with respect to 6-month HHS [mean difference (MD) = -8.28 (-14.46, -2.10), P = 0.009] and 1-year EQ-5D [MD = -0.07 (-0.14, -0.00), P = 0.04]. The 2 techniques were comparable regarding length of hospital stay (day), HHS at 1 and 2 years, EQ-5D at 2 years, and mortality. IF was inferior to HA in implant-related complication [20.1% vs. 6.0%, relative risk (RR) = 3.18 (1.72, 5.88), P = 0.0002] and reoperation rate [20.1% vs. 6.0%, RR = 3.30 (1.79, 6.08), P = 0.0001]. Hemiarthroplasty had a greater blood loss (mL) [MD = -138.88 (-209.58, -68.18), P = 0.001] and operation duration (min) [MD = -23.27 (-44.95, -1.60), P = 0.04] compared with IF. HA is the preferred technique for nondisplaced FNF if early recovery, higher mobility, and better quality of life are priorities. The choice of fixation should be weighed on an individual patient level. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Displaced Versus Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures: Is Arthroplasty the Answer for Both?

BackgroundTraditionally, nondisplaced geriatric femoral neck fractures (FNFs) have undergone operative fixation, while displaced geriatric FNFs have undergone hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences between outcomes in patients with nondisplaced (Garden I and II) fractures and displaced (Garden III and IV) fractures that were treated with arthroplasty. MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients who had a minimum of 1 year follow-up from nine academic medical centers who underwent arthroplasty for FNFs between 2010 and 2020. Chi-square, Fisher’s Exact, and t-tests were used to compare demographics and outcomes between patients who had a displaced fracture and those who had a nondisplaced fracture. We included 1,620 patients, with 131 in the nondisplaced cohort and 1,497 in the displaced cohort. The mean follow-up in the study was 26.4 months. Both groups were similar in terms of demographic variables. ResultsAt 1-year follow-up, the overall reoperation rate was 7% and was not different between patients who had nondisplaced compared to displaced FNFs who underwent arthroplasty. Heterotopic ossification (HO) was significantly higher in displaced (23.6%) versus nondisplaced fractures (11.7%) (P = .0021). Operative times and blood loss were higher in nondisplaced than displaced fractures that underwent arthroplasty. ConclusionHip arthroplasty is an excellent treatment option for nondisplaced and displaced geriatric FNFs with relatively low and similar reoperation rates at 1 year. Compared to previously published reoperation rates of internal fixation of nondisplaced FNFs, hip arthroplasty is a reasonable treatment option for nondisplaced FNFs to potentially decrease reoperations in a frail patient population.

Preoperative posterior tilt can be a risk factor of fixation failure in nondisplaced femoral neck fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify whether posterior tilt increases the risk of treatment failure in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. We searched the databases of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1980 to 2022. The search strategy was based on the combination of keywords "nondisplaced," "hip fracture," "femoral neck fracture," and "internal fixation." Cohort studies enrolled patients with nondisplaced (Garden I and Garden II) femoral neck fractures were included. Two investigators independently extracted data and the other two assessed the methodological quality. Data were analyzed using Review Manager software. We analyzed 13 cohort trials with a pooled sample of 4818 patients, with posterior tilt ≥ 20° in 698 patients and < 20° in 3578 patients in 11 trials, and posterior tilt ≥ 10° in 483 patients and < 10° in 496 patients in 4 trials. All studies were of high quality based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale evaluation. Treatment failure was reported in 24.4% (170/698) of patients with posterior tilt ≥ 20° and 10.9% (392/3578) of patients with posterior tilt < 20°, indicating that posterior tilt ≥ 20° was significantly associated with a higher risk of treatment failure (Risk ratio, 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77-4.21). Posterior tilt ≥ 10° was not found to be a risk factor for fixation failure (risk ratio, 1.92; 95% CI 0.76-4.83). Nondisplaced femoral neck fractures with posterior tilt ≥ 20° were associated with an increasing rate of failure when treated with internal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Are We Really Doing Our Best in Treating Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures?: Commentary on an article by Johan Lagergren, MD, et al.: "Conversion to Arthroplasty After Internal Fixation of Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures. Results from a Swedish Register Cohort of 5,428 Individuals 60 Years of Age or Older".

Are We Really Doing Our Best in Treating Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures?: Commentary on an article by Johan Lagergren, MD, et al.: "Conversion to Arthroplasty After Internal Fixation of Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures. Results from a Swedish Register Cohort of 5,428 Individuals 60 Years of Age or Older".

Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Anteroposterior (AP) alignment assessment for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is important for determining the treatment strategy and predicting postoperative outcomes. AP alignment is generally measured using the Garden alignment index (GAI). However, its reliability remains unknown. We compared the reliability of GAI and a new AP alignment measurement (valgus tilt measurement [VTM]) using preoperative AP radiographs of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. The study was designed as an intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis. The raters were four trauma surgeons who assessed 50 images twice. The main outcome was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To calculate intra- and inter-rater reliability, we used a mixed-effects model considering rater, patient, and time. The overall ICC (95% CI) of GAI and VTM for intra-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89-0.94) and 0.86 (0.82-0.89), respectively. The overall ICC of GAI and VTM for inter-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89-0.95), and 0.85 (0.81-0.88), respectively. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of GAI was higher in patients aged &lt;80 years than in patients aged ≥80 years. Our results showed that GAI is a more reliable measurement method than VTM, although both are reliable. Variations in patient age should be considered in GAI measurements.

Clinical performance of the Femoral Neck System within 1 year in 125 patients with acute femoral neck fractures, a prospective observational case series

IntroductionOsteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is an important treatment option, especially for younger patients. We aimed to assess the rate of early implant-related complications in FNF osteosynthesis using the Femoral Neck System (FNS).Patients and methodsConsecutive patients diagnosed with displaced or nondisplaced FNFs were treated with FNS in this prospective, observational, multicenter investigation. Patients were followed up for minimally 3 months and up to 12 months if radiologic bone union and no pain was not achieved beforehand. Predefined treatment-related adverse events (AEs, defined as implant failure, loss of reduction, iatrogenic fractures, deep infection, and surgical revision), radiologic bone union, and patient-reported Harris hip score (HHS) and EQ-5D-5L index score were assessed.ResultsOne hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the study. Thirty-eight (30.4%) fractures were displaced (Garden III and IV), and 37 (29.6%) were vertical fractures (Pauwels type III). Predefined treatment-related AE rate at 3 months was 8 patients, 6.4% (95% CI, 2.8–12.2), and at 12 months, 11 patients, 8.8% (95% CI, 4.5–15.2). Cumulative incidences of bone union were 68% at 3 months, 90% at 6 months, and 98% at 12 months. The mean changes of HHS and EQ-5D-5L index score between preinjury and at 12 months were -7.5 (95% CI, [ – 21.1] to [6.2]) and – 0.03 (95% CI, [ – 0.21] to [0.15]), respectively; neither were statistically significant.ConclusionThe current study on osteosynthesis of FNFs with the FNS resulted in treatment-related complication rates of 6.4% (95% CI, 2.8–12.2) at 3 months and 8.8% (95% CI, 4.5–15.2) at 12 months. On average, patients returned to preinjury function and quality of life. The current study may also indicate that the conventional wisdom of treating stable FNF in patients aged between 60 and 80 years with osteosynthesis may need to be reconsidered.RegistrationThe study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT02422355).

Relationship between site-specific bone mineral density in the proximal femur and instability of proximal femoral fractures: A retrospective study

BackgroundProximal femoral fractures can occur in patients with osteoporosis. However, the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur and fracture type and instability remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether there is a relationship between the site-specific BMD of the proximal femur and the instability of proximal femoral fracture. HypothesisThe instability of proximal femoral fractures is related to the site-specific BMD of the proximal femur. Patients and methodsUsing dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), the BMD on the non-fractured side was retrospectively examined in 252 women who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture at our hospital. The BMD was measured at three sites: the femoral neck (neck), trochanter (trochanter), and intertrochanteric region (inter). The BMD at several sites was compared between the femoral neck and trochanteric fractures. Femoral neck fractures were classified into the displaced and non-displaced types, and trochanteric fractures were classified into stable and unstable types. A comparative analysis was conducted for each proximal femur site and fracture type. ResultsBoth total and site-specific BMDs were lower in trochanteric fractures than in femoral neck fractures. No difference was observed between BMD and displaced or non-displaced femoral neck fractures. However, the BMD of the intertrochanteric region was lower in unstable trochanteric fractures (0.57±0.12g/cm2) than in stable trochanteric fractures (0.61±0.11g/cm2) [p<0.05]. DiscussionSeveral factors, including the patient's age and the bone component of each region, may influence the lower BMD in trochanteric fractures. In trochanteric fractures, the site-specific BMD of the proximal femur may predict the type of fracture and the degree of instability, especially in those with low BMD at the intertrochanteric site. The study findings suggest that a decrease in the BMD of the intertrochanteric region of femoral trochanteric fractures, which is thought to be involved in instability, is associated with fracture type instability. Level of evidenceIII, retrospective study.