Non-curative Treatment Research Articles

Analysis of treatment benefits and prognostic factors for Post-Transplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in a large Euro-American-Asian cohort.

Post-transplant HCC recurrence significantly impacts survival, yet its management is challenging due to limited evidence. With recent advancements in HCC treatment, updated data on managing recurrent disease is needed. In this retrospective study across six centers (2000-2022), we employed Cox proportional-hazards regression and log-rank tests to assess survival differences. A prognostic score model was developed to categorize patient survival. Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors was evaluated through propensity score matching. In our study, 431 of 3349 (14%) transplanted HCC patients developed recurrence within a median interval of 18 (IQR:9-32) months. 147 (34%) underwent curative-intent treatments, 207 (48%) received palliative treatments, and 77 (18%) were given best-supportive care. Patients undergoing curative-intent treatments had better survival from the time of recurrence with median survival of 45 (95%CI:36-63) months and 1/3/5-year survival of 90%/56%/43% compared to those receiving non-curative treatments (median: 11 (95%CI:10-13) months, 1/3/5-year survival of 46%/10%/7%, log-rank p<0.001). Patients with recurrence diagnosed in the era 2018-2022 showed improved survival over previous era (HR 0.64 (95%CI:0.47-0.86)). Multivariable analysis identified 5 prognostic factors: ineligibility for curative-intent treatment (HR 3.5 (95%CI:2.7-4.6)), recurrence within 1-year (HR 1.7 (95%CI:1.3-2.1)), poor tumor differentiation (HR 1.5 (95%CI:1.1-1.9)), RETREAT score ≥3 (HR 1.4 (95%CI:1.1-1.8)) and AFP at recurrence ≥400ng/mL (HR 1.4 (95%CI:1.1-1.9)). These factors contributed to a prognostic scoring system (0-9) that stratified patients into three prognosis groups. Both propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable regression indicated that lenvatinib was not statistically superior to sorafenib in terms of efficacy. Curative-intent treatments should be advocated for patients with post-transplant recurrence whenever possible. Prognostic factors linked to aggressive tumor biology significantly influence survival. Advancements in HCC management have improved survival outcomes over the past five years.

Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Large Integrated US Health System

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading oncologic cause of death among patients with cirrhosis, but large studies examining mortality trends are lacking. To evaluate survival among patients with HCC in one of the largest integrated health care systems in the US. This retrospective cohort study included 3441 adult patients who received a diagnosis of HCC between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2019, with end of follow-up on December 31, 2020. The study period was further categorized as era 1, defined as 2006 to 2012, and era 2, defined as 2013 to 2019. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 2021 to June 2024. Patient demographic characteristics and disease factors. All-cause and HCC-specific mortality were used as primary end points, and survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, race and ethnicity, cause of disease, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, alpha-fetoprotein level, and treatment type. Of 3441 patients with HCC, 2581 (75.0%) were men, and the median age was 65 years (IQR, 58-73 years). A total of 1195 patients (34.7%) received curative treatment, 1374 (39.9%) received noncurative treatment, and 872 (25.3%) received no treatment. During the study period, 2500 patients (72.7%) experienced all-cause mortality, and 1809 (52.6%) had HCC-specific mortality. In multivariable analysis, being 70 years of age or older (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.22-1.59), male sex (AHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35), BCLC stage C or D (AHR, 2.40; 95% CI, 2.15-2.67), increasing alpha-fetoprotein level (vs <20 ng/mL; 20-99 ng/mL: AHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.38; ≥1000 ng/mL: AHR, 2.84; 95% CI, 2.45-3.25), noncurative treatment (AHR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.16-2.90), and no treatment (AHR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.64-3.76) were associated with higher all-cause mortality, while Asian or Other Pacific Islander race and ethnicity (vs non-Hispanic White; AHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.88) was associated with lower all-cause mortality. Survival improved in diagnosis era 2 (2013-2019; n = 2007) compared with diagnosis era 1 (2006-2012; n = 1434). This large, racially and ethnically diverse cohort study of patients with HCC found improving survival over time, especially among individuals with early-stage HCC receiving potentially curative treatments. This study highlights the importance of surveillance for detection of HCC at early stages, particularly among groups at risk for poorer outcomes.

Mesenchymal Tumor Management: Integrating Surgical and Non-Surgical Strategies in Different Clinical Scenarios.

Mesenchymal tumors originate from mesenchymal cells and can be either benign or malignant, such as bone, soft tissue, and visceral sarcomas. Surgery is a cornerstone treatment in the management of mesenchymal tumors, often requiring complex procedures performed in high-volume referral centers. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted this need for alternative non-surgical approaches due to limited access to surgical resources. This review explores the role of non-surgical treatments in different clinical scenarios: for improving surgical outcomes, as a bridge to surgery, as better alternatives to surgery, and for non-curative treatment when surgery is not feasible. We discuss the effectiveness of active surveillance, cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and other ablative techniques in managing these tumors. Additionally, we examine the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and hypofractionated radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas. The Sarculator tool is highlighted for its role in stratifying high-risk sarcoma patients and personalizing treatment plans. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, integrating advanced non-surgical strategies can enhance therapeutic possibilities and patient care, especially in specific clinical settings with limitations. A multidisciplinary approach in referral centers is vital to determine the optimal treatment course for each patient.

Pexidartinib Upfront in a Case of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: Proof of Concept for a Treatment Paradigm Shift.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive tumor of the joints, bursa, and tendon sheath that can cause considerable pain and substantial morbidity. Although surgery is the primary treatment for patients with TGCT, surgical resection is associated with high rates of recurrence, particularly for patients with diffuse TGCT. Pexidartinib, a colony-stimulating factor1 receptor inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult patients with symptomatic TGCT associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. A 32-year-old man presented with intra-articular diffuse TGCT with pain and received noncurative treatment for 5years (2014-2019). In 2019, the patient was found to have extensive disease accompanied by pain and limited range of motion. The patient's case was presented to a sarcoma multidisciplinary tumor board, who determined that surgery would cause significant morbidity and macroscopic residual tumor. As a result of the extent of disease, young age, and otherwise good health, treatment with pexidartinib was started through a compassionate use program at 800mg/day. After dose reductions to pexidartinib at 400mg/day and then 200mg/day as a result of creatine phosphokinase elevations, the patient achieved a complete response after 2years of treatment; pain was reduced and mobility was restored. The patient reported no side effects related to pexidartinib treatment. Treatment was stopped in 2022 for future family planning. After pexidartinib therapy was interrupted, the patient's wife had a successful pregnancy and delivery; however, the disease showed a slow but constant clinical deterioration, with a reduction in the range of movement of the affected knee and an apparent increase in widespread TGCT nodules. Our case is unique because it provides support for pexidartinib use as upfront therapy for TGCT, instead of surgery, in selected cases.

Outcomes of noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal cancer: Prospective, multicenter, cohort study in Japan.

This study investigated the incidence of lymph node metastasis and long-term outcomes in patients with T1 colorectal cancer where endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) resulted in noncurative treatment. It is focused on those with deep submucosal invasion, a factor considered a weak predictor of lymph node metastasis in the absence of other risk factors. This nationwide, multicenter, prospective study conducted a post-hoc analysis of 141 patients with T1 colorectal cancer ≥20 mm where ESD of the lesion resulted in noncurative outcomes, characterized by poor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion (≥1000 μm), lymphovascular invasion, high-grade tumor budding, or positive vertical margins. Clinicopathologic features and patient prognoses focusing on lesion sites and additional surgery requirements were evaluated. Lymph node metastasis incidence in the low-risk T1 group, identified by deep submucosal invasion as the sole high-risk histological feature, was assessed. Lymph node metastasis occurred in 14% of patients undergoing additional surgery post-noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal cancer. In the low-risk T1 group, in the absence of other risk factors, the frequency was 9.7%. The lymph node metastasis rates in patients with T1 colon and rectal cancers did not differ significantly (14% vs. 16%). Distant recurrence was observed in one patient (2.3%) in the ESD only group and in one (1.0%) in the additional surgery group, both of whom had had rectal cancer removed. The risk of lymph node metastasis or distant occurrence was not negligible, even in the low-risk T1 group. The findings suggest the need for considering additional surgery, particularly for rectal lesions (Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000010136).

Limited Generalizability of Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study in Comparison to Multicenter Cohort Study on Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

We aimed to evaluate the generalizability of retrospective single-center cohort studies on prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by comparing overall survival (OS) after various treatments between a nationwide multicenter cohort and a single-center cohort of HCC patients. Patients newly diagnosed with HCC between January 2008 and December 2018 were analyzed using data from the Korean Primary Liver Cancer Registry (multicenter cohort, n=16,443), and the Asan Medical Center HCC registry (single-center cohort, n=15,655). The primary outcome, OS after initial treatment, was compared between the two cohorts for both the entire population and for subcohorts with Child-Pugh A liver function (n=2797 and n=5151, respectively) treated according to the Barcelona-Clinic-Liver-Cancer (BCLC) strategy, using Log rank test and Cox proportional hazard models. Patients of BCLC stages 0 and A (59.3% vs 35.2%) and patients who received curative treatment (42.1% vs 32.1%) were more frequently observed in the single-center cohort (Ps<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed significant differences between the two cohorts in OS according to type of treatment: the multicenter cohort was associated with higher risk of mortality among patients who received curative (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.48 [1.39-1.59]) and non-curative (1.22 [1.17-1.27]) treatments, whereas the risk was lower in patients treated with systemic therapy (0.83 [0.74-0.92]) and best supportive care (0.85 [0.79-0.91]). Subcohort analysis also demonstrated significantly different OS between the two cohorts, with a higher risk of mortality in multicenter cohort patients who received chemoembolization (1.72 [1.48-2.00]) and ablation (1.44 [1.08-1.92]). Comparisons of single-center and multicenter cohorts of HCC patients revealed significant differences in OS according to treatment modality after adjustment for prognostic variables. Therefore, the results of retrospective single-center cohort studies of HCC treatments may not be generalizable to real-world practice.

Risk of significant functional impairment across cancer diagnosis and care continuum.

11100 Background: The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent of unmet need to address physical and functional (PF) impairment among ambulatory cancer patients who were screened at baseline for PF impairment in the NCI Cancer Moonshot study - Northwestern University Improving the Management of Symptoms during and Following Cancer Treatment (NU IMPACT). We hypothesized that PF impairment, measured using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System – Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), would be common overall, and more prevalent for patients receiving active treatment (intent to cure or palliative) as compared to those in the post-treatment survivorship phase. We also hypothesized that PF impairment would differ across tumor types, independent of cancer continuum phase. Methods: The sample consisted of adults diagnosed with cancer, enrolled and consented in NU IMPACT (n=2,273). We compared PROMIS-PF scores across phases of the cancer continuum. Cancer continuum status was defined by the electronic health record (Epic) Beacon module that classifies patients as receiving active cancer treatment (intent to cure or palliative). Patients not assigned a Beacon status were classified as being in the survivorship group. Tumor type was derived from tumor registry data. A PF score less than or equal to 40 was categorized as moderate-to-severe impairment. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate our hypotheses with a 95% confidence interval. Results: Overall, 40% of patients reported moderate-to-severe PF impairment. Patients diagnosed with melanoma reported the least impairment; those with lung cancer were 6.5 times more likely to have moderate-to-severe PF impairment (95% CI: 2.39 - 17.77). Those in non-curative intent treatment were 1.5 times more likely to have PF impairment (95% CI: 1.05 - 2.15) with lower mean PF scores (mean = 43; p&lt;.001) as compared to those in curative intent (mean=46) and survivorship (mean=48). One-third of those reporting PF impairment also reported moderate-to-severe levels of pain and/or fatigue. Conclusions: PF impairment is present for a large minority of our cohort. Except for patients with lung cancer, PF impairment varied little by tumor type suggesting unmet need across the board. Those in non-curative treatment had more PF impairment than those in post-treatment survivorship providing guidance for targeted and early intervention by cancer rehabilitation. There appears to be a clustering of symptoms that affect human movement. Regular monitoring for PF impairments – in addition to pain and fatigue - may fill a gap in care that should be addressed with appropriate cancer rehabilitation referral and intervention. PROMIS-PF effectively identified variation in physical function. Future studies will explore how timely detection of PF impairment can be used to refer patients for appropriate cancer rehabilitation services and utilization.

Abstract 1579: Macrophage infiltration and polarization in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following stereotactic body radiation therapy

Abstract Introduction: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) due to its precise delivery and potential to improve local control. Beyond its direct impact on tumor cells, accumulating evidence suggests that SBRT may also modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME), influencing immune responses. Macrophages play a crucial role in the TME with their polarization into pro-inflammatory (M1) or pro-tumoral (M2) phenotypes significantly impacting cancer progression. Studying the TME and developing immune therapies may be helpful for metastatic PDAC, which currently only has non-curative treatment. The TME, in particular the polarization of macrophages, has not been well studied following radiation treatment. Therefore, our work aims to study how SBRT affects the infiltration and polarization of macrophages in the PDAC TME in a time-dependent manner. Methods: To establish and study PDAC C57BL/6J mice were orthotopically injected with a luciferase-labeled KPC tumor cell line. SBRT was administered to tumor-bearing mice following a schedule of 10Gy radiation per fraction in total of 5 fractions on days 10-14 post tumor implantation. Mice were euthanized on day 1, 3 and 7 after irradiation. Tumor tissues were collected for immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and flow cytometry with antibodies targeting CD68, CD11b, CD86 (M1 marker), and CD206 (M2 marker). Images were analyzed and quantified using ImageJ and GraphPad Prism. Results: Via the use of IHC staining, we found no significant difference in the number of cells stained with the CD68 antibody (macrophage marker) when compared throughout groups. Additionally, we found no significant difference in the number of macrophages stained with the M2 marker. However, we did observe a significant increase in the number of macrophages stained with the M1 marker in the group receiving SBRT. Through flow cytometry of the tumor tissues we observed an increasing trend, as time passed, in the number of macrophages expressing the M1 marker. The same trend was observed in macrophages expressing both the M1 and M2 markers. However, a change in the total number of macrophages or those expressing only the M2 marker was not observed. Conclusions: SBRT does not affect the total number of infiltrated macrophages in the TME or the amount of M2 macrophages. However, we did observe that the percentage of M1 macrophage increases significantly as time passes after SBRT. We theorize that the increase in M1 macrophages may be due to an M2 to M1 transition in the M2 population. Our study provides preliminary rationale to use macrophage-targeted immune therapy to potentiate the efficacy of SBRT for PDAC treatment, though we understand that further follow-up studies with a larger sample size and longer time course are required to obtain significant and meaningful results. Citation Format: Emil D. Gonzalez Marrero, Liang Wang, Benjamin R. Schrank, Albert C. Koong. Macrophage infiltration and polarization in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following stereotactic body radiation therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1579.

Hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma has superior overall survival compared with other etiologies.

Whether the etiology of chronic liver disease (CLD) impacts the overall survival (OS) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We aim to clarify this issue. Between 2011 and 2020, 3941 patients who were newly diagnosed with HCC at our institution were enrolled in this study. In patients with multiple CLD etiologies, etiology was classified using the following hierarchy: hepatitis C virus (HCV) > hepatitis B virus (HBV) > alcohol-related > all negative. All negative was defined as negative for HCV, HBV, and alcohol use disorder. Among 3941 patients, 1407 patients were classified with HCV-related HCC, 1677 patients had HBV-related HCC, 145 patients had alcohol-related HCC, and 712 patients had all-negative HCC. Using the all-negative group as the reference group, multivariate analysis showed that HBV is an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio: 0.856; 95% confidence interval: 0.745-0.983; p = 0.027). Patients with HBV-related HCC had superior OS compared with patients with other CLD etiologies (p<0.001). Subgroup analyses were performed, for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages 0-A (p<0.001); serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels≧20 ng/ml (p<0.001); AFP levels < 20 ng/ml (p<0.001); age > 65 years (p<0.001); and the use of curative treatments (p = 0.002). No significant difference in OS between HBV and other etiologies was observed among patients aged ≤ 65 years (p = 0.304); with BCLC stages B-D (p = 0.973); or who underwent non-curative treatments (p = 0.1). Patients with HBV-related HCC had superior OS than patients with other HCC etiologies.

Effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on incidence and treatment strategies of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with chronic liver disease.

Chronic liver disease (CLD) was associated with adverse clinical outcomes among people with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. To determine the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the incidence and treatment strategy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with CLD. A retrospective, territory-wide cohort of CLD patients was identified from an electronic health database in Hong Kong. Patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)+CLD] between January 1, 2020 and October 25, 2022 were identified and matched 1:1 by propensity-score with those without (COVID-19-CLD). Each patient was followed up until death, outcome event, or November 15, 2022. Primary outcome was incidence of HCC. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, adverse hepatic outcomes, and different treatment strategies to HCC (curative, non-curative treatment, and palliative care). Analyses were further stratified by acute (within 20 d) and post-acute (21 d or beyond) phases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated by Poisson regression models. Of 193589 CLD patients (> 95% non-cirrhotic) in the cohort, 55163 patients with COVID-19+CLD and 55163 patients with COVID-19-CLD were included after 1:1 propensity-score matching. Upon 249-d median follow-up, COVID-19+CLD was not associated with increased risk of incident HCC (IRR: 1.19, 95%CI: 0.99-1.42, P = 0.06), but higher risks of receiving palliative care for HCC (IRR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.46-1.75, P < 0.001), compared to COVID-19-CLD. In both acute and post-acute phases of infection, COVID-19+CLD were associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (acute: IRR: 7.06, 95%CI: 5.78-8.63, P < 0.001; post-acute: IRR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.14-1.36, P < 0.001) and adverse hepatic outcomes (acute: IRR: 1.98, 95%CI: 1.79-2.18, P < 0.001; post-acute: IRR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.13-1.35, P < 0.001), compared to COVID-19-CLD. Although CLD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were not associated with increased risk of HCC, they were more likely to receive palliative treatment than those without. The detrimental effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection persisted in post-acute phase.

Palliative Care Use Trends, Racial/Ethnic Disparities, and Overall Survival Differences Among Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Background: Palliative care improves cancer patients' quality of life. Limited research has investigated racial/ethnic disparities in palliative care utilization and its associated survival among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Objectives: To examine racial/ethnic palliative care use disparities and assess racial/ethnic overall survival differences in MBC patients stratified by palliative care use. Design: A retrospective study of MBC patients from the 2004-2020 National Cancer Database. Measurements: Palliative care was defined as noncurative cancer treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or pain management; utilization was coded "yes/no." Racial/ethnic groups included Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), Black, Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (HPI), Hispanic, and White. Logistic regression was performed to assess palliative care use disparities. Overall survival was modeled using Cox regression. Results: Of 148,931 patients, the mean age was 62 years; 99% were female; 73% identified as White, 17% as Black, 6% as Hispanic, 3% as Asian, 0.3% as AIAN, and 0.3% as HPI; 42% and 39% had Medicare and private insurance, respectively. Overall, 21% used palliative care, with an increasing utilization rate from 2004 to 2020 (3.6% increase per year, p-trend <0.001). Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 0.94), Asian (aOR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.86), and Hispanic (aOR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.74) patients had a lower likelihood of palliative care utilization than White patients. Among palliative care users, compared with White patients, Black (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.21) patients had a greater mortality risk, while Asian (aHR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.97) and Hispanic (aHR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.87) patients had a lower mortality risk. Conclusions: Palliative care utilization among MBC patients significantly increased but remained suboptimal. Racial/ethnic minority patients were less likely to use palliative care, and Black patients had worse survival, than White patients, suggesting the need for improving palliative care access and ameliorating disparities in MBC patients.

Non-Curative Treatment Choices in Colorectal Cancer: Predictors and Between-Hospital Variations in Denmark: A Population-Based Register Study.

Variations in treatment choices have been reported in colorectal cancer (CRC). In the context of national recommendations, we aimed to elucidate predictors and between-hospital variations in refraining from curatively intended surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in potentially curable colorectal cancer. A total of 34,116 patients diagnosed with CRC from 2009 to 2018 were included for analyses on non-curative treatment in this register-based study. Subsequently 8006 patients were included in analyses on adjuvant treatment. Possible predictors included patient-, disease-, socioeconomic- and perioperative-related factors. Logistic regressions were utilized to examine the predictors of a non-curative aim of treatment and no adjuvant chemotherapy. The predictors of non-curative treatment were high age, poor performance, distant metastases and being underweight. Predictors for no adjuvant treatment were high age, poor performance, kidney disease, postoperative complications and living alone. For both outcomes we found between-hospital variations to be present. Non-curative overall treatment and refraining from adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with well-known risk factors, but the former was also associated with being underweight and the latter was also associated with living alone. Marked between-hospital variations were found and should be examined further.

"Palliare" surrounded with care.

Introduction: Despite scientific evidence about the benefits of Advance Care Planning (ACP) for patients with non-curative treatment, ACP is rarely discussed in practice. Why is it difficult for health professionals to mention ACP? How can patients and their family caregivers take control of their own care process and be actively engaged?&#x0D; The aim of this project is to empower patients and their family caregivers to discuss their wishes and care goals in a palliative phase, and to provide health professionals with communication techniques and skills to use in a palliative conversation. A common language is introduced so that all parties can communicate more comfortably with each other.&#x0D; Target groups: We focus on oncology patients with non-curative therapy, their relatives and their professional care providers.&#x0D; To identify these palliative patients, physicians will have to indicate via MOC (multidisciplinary oncologic consultation) registration if the therapy of an oncology patient is curative or non-curative. If the patient can’t be cured, early palliative care needs to be integrated into daily oncology practice by offering an interactive meeting in group. The group of care providers is a multidisciplinary team with oncologists, oncology nurses, palliative care specialists, bedside nurses, social workers, psychologists, etc.&#x0D; Methodology: We started with a kick-off session in which the members of the project (oncologists, oncology nurse, palliative care specialist and palliative care nurse) explained the purpose of the project to healthcare professionals. We explained a number of concepts and suggested the specific language we want to maintain.&#x0D; After this first session, we organized interactive workshops for patients and their relatives to provide them with tools to establish and communicate about their end of life wishes and care goals. In this workshop, we explained the concept of ‘palliative care’ and the importance of an active involvement of the patient and his/ her relatives during this palliative phase. By performing a role play, we elaborated on the questions that are important to ask the physician, and how patients and relatives can ask these questions.&#x0D; In parallel we organized workshops for different teams of health professionals to provide them with more advanced communication skills and to learn them how to sense when patients are ready for a palliative care conversation. In these interactive workshops we also interspersed communication theory with role plays.&#x0D; Results: Surveys based on the validated PAM-13 questionnaire will be provided to all participants (patients and healthcare professionals). Because the project is still in full development at the moment, we don’t have results yet. We hope to present our results during the ICIC23 in May 2023 and to enthuse and inspire other healthcare professionals about the importance of patient empowerment during a palliative phase.

Performance status as a prognostic surrogate in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role of albumin-bilirubin and easy-albumin-bilirubin grade.

Performance status (PS) is associated with the severity of liver cirrhosis and is also an important survival determinant in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade and easy (EZ)-ALBI grade have been proposed to evaluate liver dysfunction in HCC, but their role in patients with different PS is unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of ALBI and EZ-ALBI grade in a large HCC cohort with variable PS. A total of 3355 newly diagnosed HCC patients between 2002 and 2018 were identified and retrospectively analyzed. Independent prognostic predictors associated with survival were investigated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Patients with poor PS had decreased survival compared with those with good PS. In the Cox model, creatinine ≥1.2 mg/dL, α-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥20 ng/mL, vascular invasion, distant metastasis, total tumor volume >100 cm 3 , presence of ascites, ALBI grades 2 and 3, EZ-ALBI grade 2 and grade 3, PS 1-4, and noncurative treatment were independently associated with higher mortality in the entire cohort (all p < 0.001). ALBI grade and EZ-ALBI grade can well stratify overall survival in subgroup patients with PS 0, PS 1-2, and PS 3-4 (all p < 0.001). Patients with good PS have better long-term survival compared with those with poor PS. ALBI and EZ-ALBI grade can discriminate long-term outcome in the entire cohort as well as in patients with different PS. ALBI and EZ-ALBI are objective and feasible prognostic models to evaluate liver dysfunction in HCC patients independent of PS.

Benznidazole treatment leads to DNA damage in Trypanosoma cruzi and the persistence of rare widely dispersed non-replicative amastigotes in mice.

Benznidazole is the front-line drug used to treat infections with Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas disease. However, for reasons that are unknown, treatment failures are common. When we examined parasites that survived benznidazole treatment in mice using highly sensitive in vivo and ex vivo bioluminescence imaging, we found that recrudescence is not due to persistence of parasites in a specific organ or tissue that preferentially protects them from drug activity. Surviving parasites are widely distributed and located in host cells where the vast majority contained only one or two amastigotes. Therefore, infection relapse does not arise from a small number of intact large nests. Rather, persisters are either survivors of intracellular populations where co-located parasites have been killed, or amastigotes in single/low-level infected cells exist in a state where they are less susceptible to benznidazole. To better assess the nature of parasite persisters, we exposed infected mammalian cell monolayers to a benznidazole regimen that reduces the intracellular amastigote population to <1% of the pre-treatment level. Of host cells that remained infected, as with the situation in vivo, the vast majority contained only one or two surviving intracellular amastigotes. Analysis, based on non-incorporation of the thymidine analogue EdU, revealed these surviving parasites to be in a transient non-replicative state. Furthermore, treatment with benznidazole led to widespread parasite DNA damage. When the small number of parasites which survive in mice after non-curative treatment were assessed using EdU labelling, this revealed that these persisters were also initially non-replicative. A possible explanation could be that triggering of the T. cruzi DNA damage response pathway by the activity of benznidazole metabolites results in exit from the cell cycle as parasites attempt DNA repair, and that metabolic changes associated with non-proliferation act to reduce drug susceptibility. Alternatively, a small percentage of the parasite population may pre-exist in this non-replicative state prior to treatment.

Survival outcomes of esophageal cancer patients with recurrence after curative treatments

BackgroundLittle is known about predictive factors for survival outcomes of esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients who developed recurrence after undergoing multimodal therapies. We aimed to investigate long-term outcomes and identify prognostic factors in patients with relapsed EC, focusing especially on those with oligometastasis (OM).MethodsEC patients who developed recurrence after curative treatments (radical esophagectomy or definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT)) between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Multivariate Cox hazards models were applied to determine independent predictors of poor post-recurrence survival (PRS).ResultsIn total, 178 patients were included. The median PRS was 12.9 months. Of the 178 patients, 98 had OM and 80 non-OM (NOM) disease. The survival outcomes of patients with OM were significantly better than those of patients with NOM (P < 0.01). Surgical treatments provided significantly better survival outcomes than CRT or chemo-/radiotherapy alone (3-year overall survival (OS); 78.1% vs. 42.5% vs. 28.9%, P < 0.01), mainly due to prolonging survival after the recurrence (3-year PRS 62.9% vs. 16.7% vs. 16.2%, P < 0.01). Multivariable analysis focusing on patients with OM revealed cStage III-IV disease (P < 0.01), high GPS at the time of recurrence (P = 0.02) and non-curative treatments (P < 0.01), to be independently associated with poor PRS. In contrast, in patients with NOM, no independent predictors for poor PRS were identified.ConclusionsThe survival outcomes of patients with relapsed EC remain poor. Surgical treatments could provide survival benefits for patients with recurrent EC, especially for patients with OM.

Survival Benefit Relative to Treatment Modalities Among Patients with Very Early Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: an Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BackgroundLiver transplantation (LT) has been considered a potential curative treatment for patients with very early intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and cirrhosis, yet the survival benefit of LT has not been well defined. This study aimed to compare the long-term survival outcomes of patients who underwent LT with that of individuals who received resection and non-curative intent treatment (non-CIT). MethodsPatients who underwent LT, hepatectomy, and non-CIT between 2004 and 2018 were included in the National Cancer Database. Survival benefits of LT over resection and non-CIT were analyzed relative to overall survival (OS). ResultsAmong 863 patients, 54 (6.3%) underwent LT, while 342 (39.6%) underwent surgical resection, and 467 (54.1%) received non-CIT, respectively. While the rates of non-CIT increased over time, the percentages of LT remained consistent during the study period. LT patients had similar 5-year OS to individuals who underwent resection (referent, resection: LT, HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.84–1.58, p=0.84). In contrast, 5-year OS was better among patients who underwent LT versus individuals who had non-CIT after controlling other variables using propensity score overlapping weighting (5-year OS, LT 57.1% vs. LR 25.8%, p<0.001). ConclusionsThe outcomes of very early ICC patients who underwent LT were similar to individuals who underwent hepatectomy, but better than patients treated with non-CIT. LT should be may be a consideration as a treatment option for patients with early stage ICC who are unsuitable candidates for resection.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis and Management in 2021: A National Veterans Affairs Quality Improvement Project

The coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic profoundly disrupted preventative health care services including cancer screening. As the largest provider of cirrhosis care in the United States, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Gastroenterology and Hepatology Program aimed to assess factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival. Veterans with a new diagnosis of HCC in 2021 were identified from electronic health records (N= 2306). Structured medical record extraction was performed by expert reviewers in a 10% random subsample of Veterans with new HCC diagnoses. Factors associated with stage at diagnosis, receipt of treatment, and survival were assessed using multivariable models. Among 199 patients with confirmed HCC, the average age was 71 years and most (72%) had underlying cirrhosis. More than half (54%) were at an early stage (T1 or T2) at diagnosis. Less-advanced liver disease, number of imaging tests adequate for HCC screening, HCC diagnosis in the VA, and receipt of VA primary care were associated significantly with early stage diagnosis. HCC-directed treatments were administered to 145 (73%) patients after a median of 37 days (interquartile range, 19-54 d) from diagnosis, including 70 (35%) patients who received potentially curative treatments. Factors associated with potentially curative (vs no) treatments included HCC screening, early stage at diagnosis, and better performance status. Having fewer comorbidities and better performance status were associated significantly with noncurative (vs no) treatment. Early stage diagnosis, diagnosis in the VA system, and receipt of curative treatment were associated significantly with survival. These results highlight the importance of HCC screening and engagement in care for HCC diagnosis, treatment, and survival while demonstrating the feasibility of developing a national quality improvement agenda for HCC screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

Survival and perioperative outcomes of octo- and nonagenarians with resectable esophageal carcinoma.

The outcomes of different treatment modalities for patients aged 80 and above with locally advanced and resectable esophageal carcinoma are not well described. The aim of this study was to explore survival and perioperative outcomes among this specific group of patients. A retrospective, cohort analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained esophageal cancer database from the McGill regional upper gastroinestinal cancer network. Between 2010 and 2020, all patients ≥80years with cT2-4a, Nany, M0 esophageal carcinoma were identified and stratified according to the treatment modality: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or chemoradiotherapy (nCRT); definitive CRT (dCRT); upfront surgery; palliative CT/RT; or best supportive care (BSC). Of the 162 patients identified, 79 were included in this study. The median age was 83years (80-97), most were cT3 (73%), cN- (56%), and had adenocarcinoma (62%). Treatment included: nCT/nCRT (16/79, 20%); surgery alone (19/79, 24%); dCRT (12/29, 15%); palliative RT/CT (27/79, 34%); and BSC (5/79, 6%). Neoadjuvant treatment was completed in 10/16 (63%). Of the 35/79 who underwent surgery, major complications occurred in 13/35 (37%) and 90-day mortality in 3/35 (9%). Overall survival (OS) for the cohort at 1- and 3-years was 58% and 19%. Among patients treated with nCT/nCRT, this was 94% and 46% respectively. Curative intent treatment (nCT/nCRT/upfront surgery/dCRT) had significantly increased 1- and 3- year OS compared with non-curative treatment (76%/31% vs. 34%/3.3%). Multimodal standard of care treatment is feasible and safe in select octo/nonagenarians, and may be associated with improved OS. Age alone should not bias against treatment with curative intent.

Association between Computed Tomography-Determined Loss of Muscle Mass and Impaired Three-Month Survival in Frail Older Adults with Cancer.

As patients with solid (non-hematological) cancers and a life expectancy of <3 months rarely benefit from oncological treatment, we examined whether the CT-determined loss of muscle mass is associated with an impaired 3-month overall survival (OS) in frail ≥75-year-old patients with cancer. Frailty was assessed with G8-screening and comprehensive geriatric assessment in older adults at risk of frailty. The L3-level skeletal (SMI) and psoas (PMI) muscle indexes were determined from routine CT scans. Established and optimized SMI and PMI cut-offs were used. In the non-curative treatment group (n = 58), 3-month OS rates for normal and low SMI were 95% and 64% (HR 9.28; 95% CI 1.2-71) and for PMI 88%, and 60%, respectively (HR 4.10; 1.3-13). A Cox multivariable 3-month OS model showed an HR of 10.7 (1.0-110) for low SMI, 2.34 (0.6-9.8) for ECOG performance status 3-4, 2.11 (0.5-8.6) for clinical frailty scale 5-9, and 0.57 (0.1-2.8) for males. The 24-month OS rates in the curative intent group (n = 21) were 91% and 38% for the normal and low SMI groups, respectively. In conclusion, CT-determined low muscle mass is independently associated with an impaired 3-month OS and, alongside geriatric assessment, could aid in oncological versus best supportive care decision-making in frail patients with non-curable cancers.