Noncognate Substrate Research Articles

Docking interactions determine substrate specificity of members of a widespread family of protein phosphatases

How protein phosphatases achieve specificity for their substrates is a major outstanding question. PPM family serine/threonine phosphatases are widespread in bacteria and eukaryotes, where they dephosphorylate target proteins with a high degree of specificity. In bacteria, PPM phosphatases control diverse transcriptional responses by dephosphorylating anti-anti-sigma factors of the STAS domain family, exemplified by B. subtilis phosphatases SpoIIE, which controls cell-fate during endospore formation, and RsbU, which initiates the General Stress Response. Using a combination of forward genetics, biochemical reconstitution, and AlphaFold2 structure prediction, we identified a conserved, tripartite substrate docking interface comprised of three variable loops on the surface of the PPM phosphatase domains of SpoIIE and RsbU that recognize the three-dimensional structure of the substrate protein. Non-conserved amino acids in these loops facilitate the accommodation of the cognate substrate and prevent dephosphorylation of the non-cognate substrate. Together, single-amino acid substitutions in these three elements cause an over five-hundred fold change in specificity. Our data additionally suggest that substrate-docking interactions regulate phosphatase specificity through a conserved allosteric switch element that controls the catalytic efficiency of the phosphatase by positioning the metal cofactor and substrate. We hypothesize that this is a generalizable mechanistic model for PPM family phosphatase substrate specificity. Importantly, the substrate docking interface with the phosphatase is only partially overlapping with the much more extensive interface with the upstream kinase, suggesting the possibility that kinase and phosphatase specificity evolved independently.

Structural basis for substrate binding and selection by human mitochondrial RNA polymerase

The mechanism by which RNAP selects cognate substrates and discriminates between deoxy and ribonucleotides is of fundamental importance to the fidelity of transcription. Here, we present cryo-EM structures of human mitochondrial transcription elongation complexes that reveal substrate ATP bound in Entry and Insertion Sites. In the Entry Site, the substrate binds along the O helix of the fingers domain of mtRNAP but does not interact with the templating DNA base. Interactions between RNAP and the triphosphate moiety of the NTP in the Entry Site ensure discrimination against nucleosides and their diphosphate and monophosphate derivatives but not against non-cognate rNTPs and dNTPs. Closing of the fingers domain over the catalytic site results in delivery of both the templating DNA base and the substrate into the Insertion Site and recruitment of the catalytic magnesium ions. The cryo-EM data also reveal a conformation adopted by mtRNAP to reject a non-cognate substrate from its active site. Our findings establish a structural basis for substrate binding and suggest a unified mechanism of NTP selection for single-subunit RNAPs.

Energetic vs. entropic stabilization between a Remdesivir analogue and cognate ATP upon binding and insertion into the active site of SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase.

SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) serves as a highly promising antiviral drug target such as for a Remdesivir nucleotide analogue (RDV-TP or RTP). In this work, we mainly used alchemical all-atom simulations to characterize relative binding free energetics between the nucleotide analogue RTP and natural cognate substrate ATP upon initial binding and pre-catalytic insertion into the active site of SARS-CoV-2 RdRp. Natural non-cognate substrate dATP and mismatched GTP were also examined for computation control. We first identified significant differences in dynamical responses between nucleotide initial binding and subsequent insertion configurations to the open and closed active sites of the RdRp, respectively, though the RdRp protein conformational changes between the active site's open and closed states are subtle. Our alchemical simulations indicated that upon initial binding (active site open), RTP and ATP show similar binding free energies to the active sites while in the insertion state (active site closed), ATP is more stabilized (∼-2.4 kcal mol-1) than RTP in free energetics. Additional analyses show, however, that RTP is more stabilized in binding energetics than ATP, in both the insertion and initial binding states, with RTP more stabilized due to the electrostatic energy in the insertion state and due to vdW energy in the initial binding state. Hence, it appears that natural cognate ATP still excels at association stability with the RdRp active site due to that ATP maintains sufficient flexibilities e.g., in base pairing with the template, which exemplifies an entropic contribution to the cognate substrate stabilization. These findings highlight the importance of substrate flexibilities in addition to energetic stabilization in antiviral nucleotide analogue design.

Functional Versatility of the Human 2-Oxoadipate Dehydrogenase in the L-Lysine Degradation Pathway toward Its Non-Cognate Substrate 2-Oxopimelic Acid.

The human 2-oxoadipate dehydrogenase complex (OADHc) in L-lysine catabolism is involved in the oxidative decarboxylation of 2-oxoadipate (OA) to glutaryl-CoA and NADH (+H+). Genetic findings have linked the DHTKD1 encoding 2-oxoadipate dehydrogenase (E1a), the first component of the OADHc, to pathogenesis of AMOXAD, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and several neurodegenerative diseases. A multipronged approach, including circular dichroism spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry, and computational approaches, was applied to provide novel insight into the mechanism and functional versatility of the OADHc. The results demonstrate that E1a oxidizes a non-cognate substrate 2-oxopimelate (OP) as well as OA through the decarboxylation step, but the OADHc was 100-times less effective in reactions producing adipoyl-CoA and NADH from the dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase (E2o) and dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (E3). The results revealed that the E2o is capable of producing succinyl-CoA, glutaryl-CoA, and adipoyl-CoA. The important conclusions are the identification of: (i) the functional promiscuity of E1a and (ii) the ability of the E2o to form acyl-CoA products derived from homologous 2-oxo acids with five, six, and even seven carbon atoms. The findings add to our understanding of both the OADHc function in the L-lysine degradative pathway and of the molecular mechanisms leading to the pathogenesis associated with DHTKD1 variants.

Unusual commonality in active site structural features of substrate promiscuous and specialist enzymes

Enzyme promiscuity is the ability of (some) enzymes to perform alternate reactions or catalyze non-cognate substrate(s). The latter is referred to as substrate promiscuity, widely studied for its biotechnological applications and understanding enzyme evolution. Insights into the structural basis of substrate promiscuity would greatly benefit the design and engineering of enzymes. Previous studies on some enzymes have suggested that flexibility, hydrophobicity, and active site protonation state could play an important role in enzyme promiscuity. However, it is not known yet whether substrate promiscuous enzymes have distinctive structural characteristics compared to specialist enzymes, which are specific for a substrate. In pursuit to address this, we have systematically compared substrate/catalytic binding site structural features of substrate promiscuous with those of specialist enzymes. For this, we have carefully constructed dataset of substrate promiscuous and specialist enzymes. On careful analysis, surprisingly, we found that substrate promiscuous and specialist enzymes are similar in various binding/catalytic site structural features such as flexibility, surface area, hydrophobicity, depth, and secondary structures. Recent studies have also alluded that promiscuity is widespread among enzymes. Based on these observations, we propose that substrate promiscuity could be defined as a continuum feature that varies from narrow (specialist) to broad range of substrate preferences. Moreover, diversity of conformational states of an enzyme accessible for ligand binding may possibly regulate its substrate preferences.

Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers

Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus.

Probing the Compatibility of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay toward the Reprogramming of Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase Adenylation Domains.

An important challenge in natural product biosynthesis is the biosynthetic design and production of artificial peptides. One of the most promising strategies is reprogramming adenylation (A) domains to expand the substrate repertoire of nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs). Therefore, the precise detection of subtle structural changes in the substrate binding pockets of A domains might accelerate their reprogramming. Here we show that an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a combination of small-molecule probes can detect the effects of substrate binding pocket residue substitutions in A-domains. When coupled with a set of aryl acid A-domain variants (total of nine variants), the ELISA can analyze the subtle differences in their active-site architectures. Furthermore, the ELISA-based screening was able to identify the variants with substrate binding pockets that accepted a non-cognate substrate from an original pool of 45. These studies demonstrate that ELISA is a reliable platform for providing insights into the active-site properties of A-domains and can be applied for the reprogramming of NRPS A-domains.

Kinetic Proofreading using Substrate Gradients and Enzyme Diffusion

Low error rates in many of the enzymatic processes in biology, such as translation or DNA replication, are attained by employing the nonequilibrium error correction mechanism called kinetic proofreading. Kinetic proofreading operates by delaying product formation through the introduction of additional biochemical intermediates, giving the enzyme more than one chance to discard the non-cognate substrate before reaching its catalytically active state. The requirements of having multiple biochemically distinct intermediates and direct coupling to NTP hydrolysis, however, limit the flexibility and performance scope of traditional proofreading schemes. In our work, we propose an alternative conceptual mechanism of enzymatic error correction where the necessary delay between initial substrate binding and product formation events is achieved by having them occur at distinct physical locations. Specifically, if the substrates are localized primarily at one end of the physical compartment and enzyme activation takes place only at the other end, then the time that it takes for the enzyme to diffuse the distance between these ends can be leveraged to perform efficient proofreading. Importantly, this mechanism requires neither multiple biochemical intermediates nor the presence of an ATP binding site on the enzyme, making its performance easily adaptable through the tuning of the system's characteristic length scales. We discuss how the tuning of these length scales changes the fidelity, speed and energy dissipation of the mechanism, and propose biological examples of its possible implementation in the cell.

How evolution shapes enzyme selectivity - lessons from aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and other amino acid utilizing enzymes.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) charge tRNA with their cognate amino acids. Many otherenzymesuse amino acids as substrates, yet discrimination against noncognate amino acids that threaten the accuracy of protein translation is a hallmark of AARSs. Comparing AARSs to these other enzymes allowed us to recognize patterns in molecular recognition and strategies used by evolution for exercising selectivity. Overall, AARSs are 2-3 orders of magnitude more selective than most other amino acid utilizing enzymes. AARSs also reveal the physicochemical limits of molecular discrimination. For example, amino acids smaller by a single methyl moiety present a discrimination ceiling of ~200, while larger ones can be discriminated by up to 105 -fold. In contrast, substrates larger by a hydroxyl group challenge AARS selectivity, due to promiscuous H-bonding with polar active site groups. This 'hydroxyl paradox' is resolved by editing. Indeed, when the physicochemical discrimination limits are reached, post-transfer editing - hydrolysis of tRNAs charged with noncognate amino acids, evolved. The editing site often selectively recognizes the edited noncognate substrate using the very same feature that the synthetic site could not efficiently discriminate against. Finally, the comparison to other enzymes also reveals that the selectivity of AARSs is an explicitly evolved trait, showing some clear examples of how selection acted not only to optimize catalytic efficiency with the target substrate, but also to abolish activity with noncognate threat substrates ('negative selection').

Unravelling the Specificity of Laminaribiose Phosphorylase from Paenibacillus sp. YM-1 towards Donor Substrates Glucose/Mannose 1-Phosphate by Using X-ray Crystallography and Saturation Transfer Difference NMR Spectroscopy.

Glycoside phosphorylases (GPs) carry out a reversible phosphorolysis of carbohydrates into oligosaccharide acceptors and the corresponding sugar 1-phosphates. The reversibility of the reaction enables the use of GPs as biocatalysts for carbohydrate synthesis. Glycosyl hydrolase family 94 (GH94), which only comprises GPs, is one of the most studied GP families that have been used as biocatalysts for carbohydrate synthesis, in academic research and in industrial production. Understanding the mechanism of GH94 enzymes is a crucial step towards enzyme engineering to improve and expand the applications of these enzymes in synthesis. In this work with a GH94 laminaribiose phosphorylase from Paenibacillus sp. YM-1 (PsLBP), we have demonstrated an enzymatic synthesis of disaccharide 1 (β-d-mannopyranosyl-(1→3)-d-glucopyranose) by using a natural acceptor glucose and noncognate donor substrate α-mannose 1-phosphate (Man1P). To investigate how the enzyme recognises different sugar 1-phosphates, the X-ray crystal structures of PsLBP in complex with Glc1P and Man1P have been solved, providing the first molecular detail of the recognition of a noncognate donor substrate by GPs, which revealed the importance of hydrogen bonding between the active site residues and hydroxy groups at C2, C4, and C6 of sugar 1-phosphates. Furthermore, we used saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy to support crystallographic studies on the sugar 1-phosphates, as well as to provide further insights into the PsLBP recognition of the acceptors and disaccharide products.

Crystal structure of Thermotoga maritima acetyl esterase complex with a substrate analog: Insights into the distinctive substrate specificity in the CE7 carbohydrate esterase family

The carbohydrate esterase family 7 (CE7) members are acetyl esterases that possess unusual substrate specificity for cephalosporin C and 7-amino-cephalosporanic acid. This family containing the α/β hydrolase fold has a distinctive substrate profile that allows it to carry out hydrolysis of esters containing diverse alcohol moieties while maintaining narrow specificity for an acetate ester. Here we investigate the structural basis of this preference for small acyl groups using the crystal structure of the thermostable Thermotoga maritima CE7 acetyl esterase (TmAcE) complexed with a non-cognate substrate analog. The structure determined at 1.86 Å resolution provides direct evidence for the location of the largely hydrophobic and rigid substrate binding pocket in this family. Furthermore, a three-helix insertion domain near the catalytic machinery shapes the substrate binding site. The structure reveals two residues (Pro228 and Ile276) which constitute a hydrophobic rigid binding surface for the acyl group of the ester and thus restricts the size of the acyl group that be accommodated. In combination with previous literature on kinetic properties of the enzyme, our studies suggest that these residues determine the unique specificity of the TmAcE for short straight chain esters. The structure provides a template for focused attempts to engineer the CE7 enzymes for enhanced stability, selectivity or activity for biocatalytic applications.

Directed evolution of λ integrase activity and specificity by genetic derepression.

Advances in genome engineering are attendant on the development of novel enzyme variants with programed substrate specificities and improved activity. We have devised a novel selection method, wherein the activity of a recombinase deletes the gene encoding an inhibitor of an enzyme conferring a selectable phenotype. By using β-lactamase and the β-lactamase inhibitor protein, the selection couples recombinase activity to Escherichia coli survival in the presence of ampicillin. Using this method, we generated λ integrase variants displaying improved in vitro recombination of a non-cognate substrate present in the human genome. One generalist integrase variant displaying enhanced catalytic activity was further used in a facile, single-step transformation method to introduce transgenes up to 8.5 kb into the unique endogenous attB site of common laboratory E.coli strains.

Proofreading of Noncognate Acyl Adenylates by an Acyl-Coenzyme A Ligase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases remove (proofread) incorrect substrates and thereby prevent errors in protein synthesis. We report enzyme-catalyzed pretransfer editing by pimeloyl-coenzyme A (CoA) ligase (BioW), a biotin synthetic enzyme that converts pimelate, a seven-carbon dicarboxylic acid, to its CoA ester. The noncognate BioW substrate glutaric acid results in hydrolysis of ATP to AMP with formation of only trace amounts of glutaryl-CoA, thereby mimicking pretransfer editing of incorrect aminoacyl-adenylates by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

Substrate recognition and fidelity of maize seryl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) catalyze the attachment of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs to establish the genetic code. To obtain the high degree of accuracy that is observed in translation, these enzymes must exhibit strict substrate specificity for their cognate amino acids and tRNAs. We studied the requirements for tRNASer recognition by maize cytosolic seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS). The enzyme efficiently recognized bacterial and eukaryotic tRNAsSer indicating that it can accommodate various types of tRNASer structures. Discriminator base G73 is crucial for recognition by cytosolic SerRS. Although cytosolic SerRS efficiently recognized bacterial tRNAsSer, it is localized exclusively in the cytosol. The fidelity of maize cytosolic and dually targeted organellar SerRS with respect to amino acid recognition was compared. Organellar SerRS exhibited higher discrimination against tested non-cognate substrates as compared with cytosolic counterpart. Both enzymes showed pre-transfer editing activity implying their high overall accuracy. The contribution of various reaction pathways in the pre-transfer editing reactions by maize enzymes were different and dependent on the non-cognate substrate. The fidelity mechanisms of maize organellar SerRS, high discriminatory power and proofreading, indicate that aaRSs in general may play an important role in translational quality control in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts.

Cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analyses of threonyl-tRNA synthetase editing domain fromAeropyrum pernix

The proofreading function of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is crucial in maintaining the fidelity of protein synthesis. Most archaeal threonyl-tRNA synthetases (ThrRSs) possess a unique proofreading domain unrelated to their eukaryotic/bacterial counterpart. The crystal structure of this domain from the archaeon Pyrococcus abysii in complex with its cognate and noncognate substrate analogues had given insights into its catalytic and discriminatory mechanisms. To probe further into the mechanistic and evolutionary aspects of this domain, work has been extended to another archaeon Aeropyrum pernix. The organism possesses two proteins corresponding to threonyl-tRNA synthetase, i.e. ThrRS1 and ThrRS2, encoded by two different genes, thrS1 and thrS2, respectively. ThrRS1 is responsible for aminoacylation and ThrRS2 for proofreading activity. Here the purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic investigation of the N-terminal proofreading domain of ThrRS2 from A. pernix is reported. The crystals belong to either the P4(1)2(1)2 or P4(3)2(1)2 space group and consist of one monomer per asymmetric unit.

The Trypanosoma brucei Life Cycle Switch TbPTP1 Is Structurally Conserved and Dephosphorylates the Nucleolar Protein NOPP44/46

Trypanosoma brucei adapts to changing environments as it cycles through arrested and proliferating stages in the human and tsetse fly hosts. Changes in protein tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins, including NOPP44/46, accompany T. brucei development. Moreover, inactivation of T. brucei protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1 (TbPTP1) triggers differentiation of bloodstream stumpy forms into tsetse procyclic forms through unknown downstream effects. Here, we link these events by showing that NOPP44/46 is a major substrate of TbPTP1. TbPTP1 substrate-trapping mutants selectively enrich NOPP44/46 from procyclic stage cell lysates, and TbPTP1 efficiently and selectively dephosphorylates NOPP44/46 in vitro. To provide insights into the mechanism of NOPP44/46 recognition, we determined the crystal structure of TbPTP1. The TbPTP1 structure, the first of a kinetoplastid protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP), emphasizes the conservation of the PTP fold, extending to one of the most diverged eukaryotes. The structure reveals surfaces that may mediate substrate specificity and affords a template for the design of selective inhibitors to interfere with T. brucei transmission.

Molecular trigger for pre-transfer editing pathway in Valyl-tRNA synthetase: A molecular dynamics simulation study

Pre-transfer editing pathway in Valyl-tRNA synthetase (ValRS) is a very important process to maintain the high fidelity of protein synthesis. However, molecular basis for this pathway remains unclear. Here we employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to study two complexes, ValRS·tRNA(val)·Val-AMP (complex V) and ValRS·tRNA(val)·Thr-AMP (complex T), and compared their simulation trajectories, in order to understand how the pre-transfer editing pathway is triggered by the noncognate substrate Thr-AMP. The MD simulations showed that the binding of Thr-AMP to ValRS led to different motions from those in complex V: clockwise rotation of the editing domain along the hinge region, and strong motions in the catalytic domain, especially in KMSKS loop. We found that the changed motion of Trp495 induced by Thr-AMP serves as a signal to discriminate Thr-AMP from Val-AMP, and the rigid (491)ILFL(494) segment then propagates this signal from Trp495 to Asp490 and induces dissociation of the salt-bridge Asp490-Arg346 and formation of the salt-bridge Glu189-Lys533. The change in salt-bridges alters the motion of KMSKS loop and the editing domain, and eventually triggers the pre-transfer editing pathway. This study provides a model for the molecular trigger of the pre-transfer editing pathway in ValRS, and is useful for further exploring this process.

Selection of bacteriophage λ integrases with altered recombination specificity by in vitro compartmentalization

In vitro compartmentalization (IVC) was employed for the first time to select for novel bacteriophage λ integrase variants displaying significantly enhanced recombination activity on a non-cognate target DNA sequence. These variants displayed up to 9-fold increased recombination activity over the parental enzyme, and one mutant recombined the chosen non-cognate substrate more efficiently than the parental enzyme recombined the wild-type DNA substrate. The in vitro specificity phenotype extended to the intracellular recombination of episomal vectors in HEK293 cells. Surprisingly, mutations conferring the strongest phenotype do not occur in the λ integrase core-binding domain, which is known to interact directly with cognate target sequences. Instead, they locate to the N-terminal domain which allosterically modulates integrase activity, highlighting a previously unknown role for this domain in directing integrase specificity. The method we describe provides a robust, completely in vitro platform for the development of novel integrase reagent tools for in vitro DNA manipulation and other biotechnological applications.

Computational structure-based redesign of enzyme activity

We report a computational, structure-based redesign of the phenylalanine adenylation domain of the nonribosomal peptide synthetase enzyme gramicidin S synthetase A (GrsA-PheA) for a set of noncognate substrates for which the wild-type enzyme has little or virtually no specificity. Experimental validation of a set of top-ranked computationally predicted enzyme mutants shows significant improvement in the specificity for the target substrates. We further present enhancements to the methodology for computational enzyme redesign that are experimentally shown to result in significant additional improvements in the target substrate specificity. The mutant with the highest activity for a noncognate substrate exhibits 1/6 of the wild-type enzyme/wild-type substrate activity, further confirming the feasibility of our computational approach. Our results suggest that structure-based protein design can identify active mutants different from those selected by evolution.

Mechanism of tRNA-dependent editing in translational quality control

Protein synthesis requires the pairing of amino acids with tRNAs catalyzed by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. The synthetases are highly specific, but errors in amino acid selection are occasionally made, opening the door to inaccurate translation of the genetic code. The fidelity of protein synthesis is maintained by the editing activities of synthetases, which remove noncognate amino acids from tRNAs before they are delivered to the ribosome. Although editing has been described in numerous synthetases, the reaction mechanism is unknown. To define the mechanism of editing, phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase was used to investigate different models for hydrolysis of the noncognate product Tyr-tRNA(Phe). Deprotonation of a water molecule by the highly conserved residue betaHis-265, as proposed for threonyl-tRNA synthetase, was excluded because replacement of this and neighboring residues had little effect on editing activity. Model building suggested that, instead of directly catalyzing hydrolysis, the role of the editing site is to discriminate and properly position noncognate substrate for nucleophilic attack by water. In agreement with this model, replacement of certain editing site residues abolished substrate specificity but only reduced the catalytic efficiency of hydrolysis 2- to 10-fold. In contrast, substitution of the 3'-OH group of tRNA(Phe) severely impaired editing and revealed an essential function for this group in hydrolysis. The phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase editing mechanism is also applicable to threonyl-tRNA synthetase and provides a paradigm for synthetase editing.