Use Of Nonaspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Research Articles

Influence of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels on NSAID-Associated Cardiovascular Risks After Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

To examine whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels influence the cardiovascular risk associated with non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use after myocardial infarction (MI). Using Danish health registries, we conducted a population-based cohort study of all adult patients with first-time MI during 2010-2020 with an LDL-C value before discharge. Based on the latest LDL-C value, we categorized patients into a low and a high LDL-C group (<3.0 vs ≥3.0 mmol/L). We used time varying Cox regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals of the association between NSAID use and a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE: recurrent MI, ischemic stroke, and all-cause death). We followed 50,573 patients for a median of 3.1 years. While exposed, 521 patients experienced a MACE: 312 in the low LDL-C group and 209 in the high LDL-C group. The HRs for MACE comparing NSAID use with non-use were 1.21 (1.11-1.32) overall, 1.19 (1.06-1.33) in the low LDL-C group, and 1.23 (1.07-1.41) in the high LDL-group. The HRs for recurrent MI and ischemic stroke were comparable between the LDL-C subgroups. The HRs for all-cause death were 1.22 (1.07-1.39) in the low LDL-C group and 1.54 (1.30-1.83) in the high LDL-C group. Changing the cut-off value for LDL-C to 1.8 and 1.4 mmol/L showed consistent results. In patients with MI, LDL-C levels did not influence the increased risk of MACE associated with NSAID use, but might influence the association between NSAID use and all-cause death.

Association between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and development of age-related macular degeneration—A 10-year retrospective cohort study

To analyze the associations between development of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and regular use of aspirin or non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NA-NSAIDs). We retrospectively recruited individuals who received ≥28-day prescriptions of aspirin or NA-NSAIDs exclusively between 2008 and 2017 in one tertiary center as regular users. Non-regular users were free from regular use of any anti-inflammatory drugs and were matched to regular users in terms of age, sex, and visit date at a ratio of 1-4:1. The aspirin cohort included 36,771 regular users and 110,808 matched non-regular users, while the NA-NSAID cohort included 59,569 regular users and 179,732 matched non-regular users. Stratified multivariate Cox regression analyses with adjustment for systemic confounding factors were performed for the development of AMD and neovascular AMD. In the aspirin cohort, the adjusted hazard ratios of aspirin use for AMD in the whole cohort, individuals without cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and those with CVDs were 0.664, 0.618, and 0.702, respectively (P<0.0001 for all), while those of aspirin use for neovascular AMD were 0.486, 0.313, and 0.584 (P<0.05 for all), respectively. In the NA-NSAID cohort, regular use of NA-NSAIDs was associated with a decreased risk of AMD (hazard ratio=0.823, P<0.0001) and neovascular AMD (hazard ratio=0.720, P=0.040) only in people without arthritis. Regular use of aspirin or NA-NSAIDs had protective effects on AMD and neovascular AMD. The effect of aspirin was observed in all patients, while the effect of NA-NSAIDs was observed only in people without arthritis.

Aspirin and nonaspirin nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use and occurrence of colorectal adenoma in Black American women.

Evidence suggests that aspirin use reduces the occurrence of colorectal neoplasia. Few studies have investigated the association among Black Americans, who are disproportionately burdened by the disease. We assessed aspirin use in relation to colorectal adenoma among Black women. The Black Women's Health Study is a prospective cohort of self-identified Black American women established in 1995. Participants reported regular aspirin use on baseline and follow-up questionnaires. Beginning in 1999, participants reported undergoing a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, the only procedures through which colorectal adenomas can be diagnosed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between aspirin use and colorectal adenoma among 34 397 women who reported at least 1 colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. From 1997 through 2018, 1913 women were diagnosed with an adenoma. Compared to nonaspirin users, regular users had 14% (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.95) lower odds of adenoma. The odds of adenoma decreased with increasing duration of aspirin use (≥10 years: OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.96). Initiating aspirin at a younger age was associated with a reduced adenoma occurrence (age < 40 years at initiation: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55-0.86). Regular aspirin use was associated with a decreased odds of colorectal adenoma in our study of Black women. These findings support evidence demonstrating a chemopreventive impact of aspirin on colorectal neoplasia and suggest that aspirin may be a useful prevention strategy among US Black women.

Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis, Not Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, are Linked to Cardiac Disease

BackgroundIn 2005, the Food and Drug Administration placed a black-box warning (the most stringent warning for drugs) on all nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) stating that these agents may cause heart attacks and/or strokes. No level I evidence demonstrates that nonselective NSAIDs increase cardiovascular risk. An alternative hypothesis is that hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) indirectly causes cardiovascular disease (CVD) through decreased activity and NSAIDs are correlated with CVD as an arthritis treatment. MethodsSystematic reviews were conducted to find observational studies evaluating the association of hip and/or knee OA, CVD, activity, walking, and step counts. The systematic review found studies correlating hip and/or knee OA and CVD morbidity incidence (n = 2); CVD morbidity prevalence (n = 6); odds ratios, relative risks, or hazard ratios of CVD morbidity (n = 11); relative risk, standardized mortality ratios, or hazard ratios of CVD mortality (n = 14); and all-cause mortality hazard ratios associated with NSAID use (n = 3). ResultsHip OA (5 studies), knee OA (9 studies), and hip and knee OA (6 studies) are linked to an increased risk of CVD morbidity and mortality. Cardiac risk increases with validated disability scores, use of walking aids, walking difficulties, longer follow-up times, younger ages of OA onset, numbers of joints involved, and OA severities. No study linked NSAID use to cardiac disease. ConclusionsAll studies with more than 10-year follow-up linked cardiac disease with hip and knee OA. No study linked nonselective NSAID use to CVD. The Food and Drug Administration should reconsider the black-box warnings on naproxen, ibuprofen, and celecoxib.

Use of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Breast Cancer: Evidence from a General Female Population and a Mammographic Screening Cohort in Sweden.

A link has been proposed between the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the risk of breast cancer. There is, however, insufficient data regarding the subtype and stage of breast cancer, and few studies have assessed the interaction between the use of NSAIDs and breast density or previous breast disorders. There is also a lack of data from population-based studies. We first conducted a nested case-control study within the general female population of Sweden, including 56,480 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer during 2006-2015 and five breast cancer-free women per case as controls, to assess the association of NSAID use with the risk of incident breast cancer, focusing on subtype and stage of breast cancer as well as the interaction between NSAID use and previous breast disorders. We then used the Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (Karma) cohort to assess the interaction between NSAID use and breast density in relation to the risk of breast cancer. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for breast cancer in relation to the use of aspirin and non-aspirin NSAIDs. In the nested case-control study of the general population, exclusive use of aspirin was not associated with the risk of breast cancer, whereas exclusive use of non-aspirin NSAIDs was associated with a modestly higher risk of stage 0-2 breast cancer (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.08) but a lower risk of stage 3-4 breast cancer (HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88). There was also a statistically significant interaction between the exclusive use of NSAIDs and previous breast disorders (p for interaction: <0.001). In the analysis of Karma participants, the exclusive use of non-aspirin NSAIDs was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer among women with a breast dense area of >40 cm2 (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.59-0.89). However, the possibility of finding this by chance cannot be ruled out. Overall, we did not find strong evidence to support an association between the use of NSAIDs and the risk of breast cancer.

Abstract 5893: Analgesic use and renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival: Results from three prospective cohort studies

Abstract Background: Analgesics are the most commonly consumed over-the-counter drugs worldwide. Considerable evidence suggests a beneficial effect of analgesics, and especially aspirin, on cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer risk. Studies examining whether widely used analgesics - aspirin, non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and acetaminophen - play a role in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have yielded mixed results. Methods: We examined associations between pre-diagnostic analgesic use and incidence of total and fatal RCC in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; 1986-2016), Nurses’ Health Study (NHS; 1980-2016 for aspirin; 1990-2016 for non-aspirin NSAIDs and acetaminophen), and Nurses’ Health Study 2 (NHS2; 1989-2015; total RCC only). Information on use of aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, and acetaminophen was collected longitudinally on biennial questionnaires. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate cohort-specific, multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to current use (updated in each questionnaire period) and, separately, duration of use (since study baseline) of each analgesic. Results across cohorts were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. We also used Cox regression to evaluate post-diagnostic analgesic use with respect to RCC-specific mortality among RCC cases in the pooled HPFS and NHS cohorts. Results: Among 259,545 participants, 796 incident RCC cases were diagnosed. Neither current nor duration of pre-diagnostic use of any of the analgesics was associated with the risk of total RCC in meta-analyses of the three study cohorts. For fatal RCC (n=175 cases), however, meta-analyses of the HPFS and NHS suggested covariate-adjusted positive associations with current (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.96-1.96, p-heterogeneity: 0.80) and duration of (HR&amp;gt;10yrs vs. Never: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.23-5.58, p-trend: 0.006, p-heterogeneity: 0.30) pre-diagnostic non-aspirin NSAID use. In addition, in the HPFS only, current (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.33-4.17) and duration of (HR&amp;gt;10yrs vs. Never: 1.83, 95% CI: 0.42-7.93, p-trend: 0.07) pre-diagnostic acetaminophen use indicated positive associations with fatal RCC. Analyses of RCC-specific mortality among participants diagnosed with RCC demonstrated an inverse association with current post-diagnostic aspirin use (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.97), but not duration of post-diagnostic aspirin use (HR&amp;gt;10yrs vs. Never: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.53-1.51, p-trend: 0.98). Analgesics were not otherwise associated with RCC survival. Conclusions: Our findings support a potential positive association between non-aspirin NSAID use and incident fatal RCC. It remains possible that analgesics may operate differently in the setting of RCC from the context of other chronic diseases. Citation Format: Rebecca E. Graff, Alejandro Sanchez, Toni K. Choueiri, Meir J. Stampfer, Edward L. Giovannucci, Lorelei A. Mucci, Eunyoung Cho, Mark A. Preston. Analgesic use and renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival: Results from three prospective cohort studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5893.

Prediction Factors of Early Postoperative Bleeding after Bariatric Surgery.

Identifying the possible predictors of postoperative bleeding is advantageous to reduce healthcare costs and promote patients' recovery. The aim of this study was to determine early postoperative bleeding predictors after bariatric surgery. This retrospective study was conducted using data from 2260 patients who underwent bariatric surgery. We diagnosed early postoperative bleeding by the following symptoms: abdominal pain, hypotension, tachycardia, hematemesis, melena, decreased hemoglobin level, the need for at least two units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfusion, and reoperation within the first 48h after surgery. Our results showed the odds of early postoperative bleeding in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) were higher than in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.79 to 6.80). In addition, prior intragastric balloon (IGB) (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.18 to 8.34) and oral non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (OR 5.91, 95% CI 1.79 to 20.63) were positively associated with the occurrence of postoperative bleeding. In contrast, there was an inverse relationship between staple line oversewing and the odds of postoperative bleeding (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.81). After stratification data based on the type of the surgery, the positive association between IGB and the odds of bleeding was constant in the LRYGB group. In the LSG group, use of non-aspirin NSAIDs was linked to a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding, while oversewing of the staple line lowered the incidence of this event. Our results demonstrated a positive association between type of procedure, history of IGB, and oral non-aspirin NSIADs use, as well as an inverse relationship between staple line oversewing and the odds of bleeding after bariatric surgery.

Analgesic Use and Circulating Estrogens, Androgens, and Their Metabolites in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

This study explores a potential pathway by which analgesic medications such as aspirin may prevent hormone-related cancers. The findings support a positive association between low-dose aspirin use and endogenous estrogens, indicating that further elucidation of the interplay between low-dose aspirin, estrogen concentrations, and cancer risk is needed.

Non-aspirin NSAIDs and head and neck cancer mortality in a Danish nationwide cohort study

BackgroundEvidence suggests that non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have antineoplastic properties of potential importance for survival of head and neck cancer. MethodsWe conducted a nationwide cohort study including all individuals with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in Denmark during 2000–2016 at age 30–84 years, with no history of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer), and alive at 1 year after diagnosis. Nationwide registries provided information on drug use, causes of death and potential confounders, and additional clinical information was obtained for a subpopulation. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between post-diagnosis non-aspirin NSAID use (defined as ≥1 filled prescription within first year after diagnosis) and cancer-specific mortality. ResultsAmong 10,770 head and neck cancer 1-year survivors, the HR for cancer-specific mortality with non-aspirin NSAID use was 1.68 at 1 year after diagnosis, but declined and stabilized around 1.15 (95% CI 1.02–1.29) at 2 years after diagnosis. Among 2-year survivors, the HRs for cancer-specific mortality with non-aspirin NSAID use remained slightly increased in analyses stratified by age, sex, stage, and pre-diagnosis non-aspirin NSAID use. Similar results were seen in the subpopulation (n = 1029) with additional clinical information, and among 5-year survivors with additional non-aspirin NSAID exposure assessment. ConclusionIn this nationwide cohort of patients with head and neck cancer, use of non-aspirin NSAIDs was associated with a slightly increased mortality risk, warranting further evaluation.

Longitudinal Study of Analgesic Use and Risk of Incident Persistent Tinnitus.

Persistent tinnitus is common, disabling, and difficult to treat. High-dose aspirin may precipitate tinnitus, but longitudinal data on typical dose aspirin and other analgesics are scarce. To investigate independent associations of aspirin, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen and risk of incident persistent tinnitus. Longitudinal cohort study. Nurses' Health Study II (1995-2017). A total of 69,455 women, age 31-48 years, without tinnitus at baseline. Information on analgesic use and tinnitus obtained by biennial questionnaires. After 1,120,936 person-years of follow-up, 10,452 cases of incident persistent tinnitus were reported. For low-dose aspirin, the risk of developing persistent tinnitus was not elevated among frequent low-dose aspirin users. For moderate dose aspirin, frequent use was associated with higher risk of tinnitus among women aged < 60 years, but not among older women (p-interactionage = 0.003). Compared with women aged < 60 using moderate-dose aspirin < 1 day/week, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (MVHR, 95% CI) among women using moderate-dose aspirin 6-7 days per week was 1.16 (1.03, 1.32). Among all women, frequent non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or acetaminophen use was associated with higher risk. Compared with women using NSAIDs <1 day/week, the MVHR for use 4-5days/week was 1.17 (1.08, 1.28) and for 6-7days/week was 1.07 (1.00, 1.16) (p-trend=0.001). For acetaminophen, compared with use <1 day/week, the MVHR for use 6-7days/week was 1.18 (1.07, 1.29) (p-trend=0.002). Information on tinnitus and analgesic use was self-reported. Information on indications for analgesic use was not available. Studies in non-White women and men are needed. The risk of developing persistent tinnitus was not elevated among frequent low-dose aspirin users. Among younger women, frequent moderate-dose aspirin use was associated with higher risk. Frequent NSAID use and frequent acetaminophen use were associated with higher risk of incident persistent tinnitus among all women, and the magnitude of the risks tended to be greater with increasing frequency of use. Our results suggest analgesic users are at higher risk for developing tinnitus and may provide insight into the precipitants of this challenging disorder, but additional investigation to determine whether there is a causal association is needed.

NSAID use and unnatural deaths after cancer diagnosis: a nationwide cohort study in Sweden

BackgroundCancer patients experience increased risk of death from accident and suicide. Cognitive impairment induced by cancer-related inflammation and stress-related psychiatric symptoms may be underlying mechanisms. We therefore studied the association between use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and risk of these outcomes.MethodsFollowing a cohort of 388,443 cancer patients diagnosed between October 2005 and December 2014 in Sweden, we ascertained dispense of aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs from 3 months before cancer diagnosis onward and defined the on-medication period as from date of drug dispense until the prescribed dosage was consumed. Follow-up time outside medicated periods and time from unexposed patients were defined as off-medication periods. We used Cox models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of death due to suicide or accident, by comparing the on-medication periods with off-medication periods.ResultsIn total, 29.7% of the cancer patients had low-dose aspirin dispensed and 29.1% had non-aspirin NSAIDs dispensed. Patients with aspirin use were more likely to be male than patients without aspirin use. Compared with off-medication periods, there was a 22% lower risk of accidental death (N = 651; HR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70 to 0.87) during on-medication periods with aspirin. The use of aspirin was not associated with risk of suicide (N = 59; HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.39). No association was noted between use of non-aspirin NSAIDs and the risk of suicide (N = 13; HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.42 to 2.18) or accidental death (N = 59; HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.26).ConclusionsIntake of low-dose aspirin after cancer diagnosis was associated with a lower risk of unnatural deaths among cancer patients.

Influence of Long-term Nonaspirin NSAID Use on Risk of Frailty in Men ≥60 Years: The Physicians' Health Study.

Inflammation is a central pathway leading to frailty but whether commonly used nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can prevent frailty is unknown. Prospective cohort study of male physicians ≥60 who participated in the Physicians' Health Study. Annual questionnaires collected data on NSAID use, lifestyle, and morbidity. Average annual NSAID use was categorized as 0 days/year, 1-12 days/year, 13-60 days/year, and >60 days/year. Frailty was assessed using a validated 33-item frailty index. Propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to address confounding by indication and logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) of prevalent frailty according to nonaspirin NSAID use. A total of 12 101 male physicians were included (mean age 70 ± 7 years, mean follow-up 11 years). Reported NSAID use was 0 days/year for 2 234, 1-12 days/year for 5 812, 13-60 days/year for 2 833, and >60 days/year for 1 222 participants. A total of 2 413 participants (20%) were frail. Higher self-reported NSAID use was associated with greater alcohol use, smoking, arthritis, hypertension, and heart disease, while less NSAID use was associated with coumadin use and prior bleeding. After propensity score adjustment, all characteristics were balanced. ORs (95% confidence intervals) of prevalent frailty were 0.90 (0.80-1.02), 1.02 (0.89-1.17), and 1.26 (1.07-1.49) for average NSAID use of 1-12 days/year, 13-60 days/year, and >60 days/year, compared to 0 days/year (p-trend < .001). Long-term use of NSAIDs at high frequency is associated with increased risk of frailty among older men. Additional study is needed to understand the role of anti-inflammatory medication in older adults and its implication for overall health.

Cardiovascular risks associated with use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

To examine whether non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use is associated with increased cardiovascular risks in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Using Danish medical registries, we conducted a population-based cohort study in Western Denmark during 2008-17. We identified all patients undergoing first-time coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) due to suspected CAD (n = 35399), with results showing no (n = 28581) or non-obstructive CAD (n = 6818). Multivariate Cox regression was used to compute hazard ratios of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including incident myocardial infarction, coronary intervention, and death. The rate of MACE increased by 33% for any NSAID use compared with non-use [hazard ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.68] in patients with no CAD and by 48% (1.48, 95% CI 1.06-2.07) in patients with non-obstructive CAD. Rate difference of MACE, per 100 person-years, was 0.38 (95% CI 0.08-0.67) in patients with no CAD (number needed to harm: 267) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.06-2.11) in patients with non-obstructive CAD (number needed to harm: 92). Current use of older cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors was associated with the highest hazard ratio in patients with non-obstructive CAD, both when ascertained as pre-CCTA use (2.9-fold increase) and when ascertained from time-varying use (1.8-fold increase). NSAID use in patients with CCTA-confirmed no and non-obstructive CAD was associated with an increased cardiovascular risk compared with non-use. The absolute risk differences and numbers needed to harm were considered clinically relevant, particularly in patients with non-obstructive CAD.

Genome-Wide association between EYA1 and Aspirin-induced peptic ulceration.

BackgroundLow-dose aspirin can cause gastric and duodenal ulceration, hereafter called peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Predisposition is thought to be related to clinical and genetic factors; our aim was to identify genetic risk factors associated with aspirin-induced PUD.MethodsPatients (n=1478) were recruited from 15 UK hospitals. Cases (n=505) were defined as patients with endoscopically confirmed PUD within 2 weeks of using aspirin and non-aspirin Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs). They were compared to two control groups: patients with endoscopically confirmed PUD without any history of NSAID use within 3 months of diagnosis (n=495), and patients with no PUD on endoscopy (n=478). A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of aspirin-induced cases (n=247) was compared to 476 controls. The results were validated by replication in another 84 cases and 162 controls.FindingsThe GWAS identified one variant, rs12678747 (p=1·65×10−7) located in the last intron of EYA1 on chromosome 8. The association was replicated in another sample of 84 PUD patients receiving aspirin (p=0·002). Meta-analysis of discovery and replication cohort data for rs12678747, yielded a genome-wide significant association (p=3·12×10−11; OR=2·03; 95% CI 1·65-2·50). Expression of EYA1 was lower at the gastric ulcer edge when compared with the antrum.InterpretationGenetic variation in an intron of the EYA1 gene increases the risk of endoscopically confirmed aspirin-induced PUD. Reduced EYA1 expression in the upper gastrointestinal epithelium may modulate risk, but the functional basis of this association will need mechanistic evaluation.FundingDepartment of Health Chair in Pharmacogenetics, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science and the Barts Cardiovascular NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, British Heart Foundation (BHF)

The Validity of Danish Prescription Data to Measure Use of Aspirin and Other Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Quantification of Bias Due to Non-Prescription Drug Use.

PurposeTo evaluate the potential of Danish prescription registries to capture aspirin and non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and to quantitatively evaluate the magnitude of bias from misclassification of true NSAID and aspirin use as apparent non-use in drug outcome studies.Patients and MethodsIn a population-based cohort study, we retrieved sales statistics for NSAIDs and aspirins based on nationwide data from the Danish Health Data Authority and the Danish National Prescription Registry. We estimated prevalence of recorded and non-recorded NSAID use in the prescription registry and resulting proportions of true NSAID and aspirin use misclassified as apparent non-use from 1999 to 2019 at population and patient levels.ResultsThe prevalence of true use misclassified as non-use (mainly due to over-the-counter use) peaked at 4.7% in 2012 for NSAIDs overall, 5.5% in 2012 for ibuprofen, and at 5.9% in 2002 for high-dose aspirin. Misclassification of other individual NSAIDs was near null. Misclassification of true low-dose aspirin use as non-use declined during the study period but remained around 1% since 2005. In subgroups of cardiac patients, the highest prevalence of true NSAID use misclassified as non-use was 5.0% in 2002 and 4.3% in 2017. Quantitative bias analyses showed how such misclassification of true NSAID and aspirin use as non-use remained minimal both at population and patient levels. In hypothetical examples simulating real study populations with differing exposure prevalence and prevalence of true NSAID and aspirin use misclassified as apparent non-use, the approximate percentage change due to misclassification of use as non-use did not exceed 5% and in most scenarios stayed around 1%.ConclusionThe Danish prescription registries are valid data sources for assessing the effects of aspirin and NSAID use. The influence of non-recorded NSAID and aspirin use on estimates of association is virtually negligible.

Non-aspirin NSAIDs use is associated with lowering of liver fibrosis scores in patients with fatty liver disease

Only a few studies are available with appropriate data on the effects of non-aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use in patients with fatty liver disease. We performed a retrospective study of 1347 patients with imaging studies that showed fatty liver disease from 2016 through 2019. We then determined the change in validated indices using Fibrosis-4 (FIB4) and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). Patient clinical information, including NSAIDs use, was collected at baseline and then yearly. Using generalized linear models, we estimated the association between non-aspirin NSAIDs use and change in baseline indices. Non-aspirin NSAIDs use was found to be associated with significant lowering of FIB-4 score (0.596 units lower, p-value &lt;0.0001) and NFS (0.431 units lower, p-value 0.0027) every year. In this retrospective study of patients with fatty liver disease found on imaging, non-aspirin NSAID use was associated with lowering of fibrosis scores, suggesting that NSAID use might be associated with a lower risk for advanced fibrosis in fatty liver disease.

Non-aspirin NSAID use and mortality of endometrial cancer. A nationwide cohort study.

Laboratory studies have shown anti-neoplastic properties of non-aspirin NSAID; however, no studies have examined the influence of non-aspirin NSAIDs as potential adjuvant cancer therapy in women with endometrial cancer. We therefore examined the association between post-diagnostic use of non-aspirin NSAIDs and endometrial cancer mortality in Denmark. We identified all women with a primary endometrial cancer diagnosis between 2000 and 2012, who were alive one year after the diagnosis. Information on drug use, cause-specific mortality and potential confounders was obtained from nationwide health- and demographic registries. Cox regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between post-diagnostic non-aspirin NSAID use and endometrial cancer mortality. Among 6 694 endometrial cancer patients with a maximum follow-up of 13years, 753 women died from endometrial cancer. Post-diagnostic non-aspirin NSAID use (≥ 1 filled prescription) was associated with an overall HR of 1.15 (95% CI; 0.97-1.36) for endometrial cancer mortality, with higher HRs for the highest intensity of use (HR; 1.40, 95% CI; 1.11-1.77) and largest cumulative amount (HR; 1.56, 95% CI; 1.14-2.14). Our findings yielded no evidence that use of non-aspirin NSAIDs was associated with reduced endometrial cancer. Rather, we observed that high-intensity and large cumulative amount of non-aspirin NSAID use may be associated with increased endometrial cancer mortality.

Associations of Aspirin and Non-Aspirin Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Diagnosis.

Aspirin use reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but there is limited evidence regarding associations of aspirin and non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with CRC-specific survival. This prospective analysis includes women and men from the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort who were cancer free at baseline (1992 or 1993) and diagnosed with CRC during incidence follow-up through 2015. Detailed information on aspirin and non-aspirin NSAID use was self-reported on questionnaires at baseline, in 1997, and every 2 years thereafter. Pre- and postdiagnosis data were available for 2686 and 1931 participants without distant metastases, respectively, among whom 512 and 251 died from CRC during mortality follow-up through 2016. Secondary analyses examined associations between prediagnosis aspirin use and stage at diagnosis (distant metastatic vs localized or regional). All statistical tests were 2-sided. Long-term regular use of aspirin (>15 times per month) before diagnosis was associated with lower CRC-specific mortality (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52 to 0.92). Postdiagnosis regular aspirin use was not statistically significantly associated with risk of CRC-specific mortality overall (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.09), although participants who began regular aspirin use only after their diagnosis were at lower risk than participants who did not use aspirin at both the pre- and postdiagnosis periods (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.98). Long-term aspirin use before diagnosis was also associated with lower odds of diagnosis with distant metastases (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.99). Our results suggest that long-term aspirin use before a diagnosis of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer may be associated with lower CRC-specific mortality after diagnosis, consistent with possible inhibition of micrometastases before diagnosis.

Nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastric cancer risk after Helicobacter pylori eradication: A territory-wide study.

Despite Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication, individuals can still develop gastric cancer (GC). Prior studies have demonstrated that nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NA-NSAIDs) reduce the risk of GC, but this may be caused by immortal time bias and failure to adjust for HP status. The objective of this study was to investigate whether NA-NSAIDs reduced the risk of GC in patients who undergo H. pylori eradication. Adult patients who had received clarithromycin-based triple therapy between 2003 and 2016 were identified from a territory-wide health care database. Exclusion criteria included prior GC or GC diagnosed <6 months after HP eradication, prior gastrectomy, gastric ulcer after HP eradication, and failure of triple therapy. Covariates included age, sex, prior peptic ulcer disease, other comorbidities, and concurrent medications (aspirin, proton pump inhibitors, statins, and metformin). To avoid immortal time bias, NA-NSAID use (≥90 days) was treated as a time-dependent variable in a multivariable Cox model (time-dependent analysis). Time-independent analysis was also performed. During a median follow-up of 8.9 years (interquartile range, 5.4-12.6 years), 364 of 92,017 patients (0.4%) who underwent HP eradication developed GC. NA-NSAID use was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of GC in time-fixed analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90), but not in time-dependent multivariable analysis (aHR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.97-1.87). Time-dependent subgroup analyses also did not indicate any significant association between NA-NSAID use and either cardia GC (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.27-2.06) or noncardia GC (aHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.83-1.98). NA-NSAID use was not associated with a reduced risk of GC among patients who underwent HP eradication. The chemopreventive effect of NA-NSAIDs observed in prior studies may have been confounded by immortal time bias.

Association of aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs therapy with the incidence risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis on cohort studies.

According to the current research evidence, the therapy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) might effectively decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence. Investigations have been conducted on the relationship between NSAIDs (aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs) and the risk of HCC incidence. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for cohort studies published prior to 15 March 2020 and screened eligible studies. There were a total of 12 eligible studies (published between 2012 and 2020). We observed a lower risk of HCC among aspirin users [hazard ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.65]. However, there were no statistically significant associations discovered between nonaspirin NSAID use and the risk of HCC incidence (hazard ratio 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79-1.15). Furthermore, aspirin use has also been found to reduce the risk of HCC in patients with cirrhosis or viral hepatitis compared to that in the general population (hazard ratio 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10-0.23; hazard ratio 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.76, respectively). Moreover, no statistical associations were found between aspirin use and a higher risk of bleeding risk, with a hazard ratio value of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.51-1.13). In summary, the conducted meta-analysis reveals that aspirin, rather than nonaspirin NSAIDs, can significantly decrease the risk of HCC, particularly in patients with cirrhosis or viral hepatitis.