Non-aspirin Non-aspirin Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Research Articles

Abstract 5893: Analgesic use and renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival: Results from three prospective cohort studies

Abstract Background: Analgesics are the most commonly consumed over-the-counter drugs worldwide. Considerable evidence suggests a beneficial effect of analgesics, and especially aspirin, on cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer risk. Studies examining whether widely used analgesics - aspirin, non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and acetaminophen - play a role in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have yielded mixed results. Methods: We examined associations between pre-diagnostic analgesic use and incidence of total and fatal RCC in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; 1986-2016), Nurses’ Health Study (NHS; 1980-2016 for aspirin; 1990-2016 for non-aspirin NSAIDs and acetaminophen), and Nurses’ Health Study 2 (NHS2; 1989-2015; total RCC only). Information on use of aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, and acetaminophen was collected longitudinally on biennial questionnaires. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate cohort-specific, multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to current use (updated in each questionnaire period) and, separately, duration of use (since study baseline) of each analgesic. Results across cohorts were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. We also used Cox regression to evaluate post-diagnostic analgesic use with respect to RCC-specific mortality among RCC cases in the pooled HPFS and NHS cohorts. Results: Among 259,545 participants, 796 incident RCC cases were diagnosed. Neither current nor duration of pre-diagnostic use of any of the analgesics was associated with the risk of total RCC in meta-analyses of the three study cohorts. For fatal RCC (n=175 cases), however, meta-analyses of the HPFS and NHS suggested covariate-adjusted positive associations with current (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.96-1.96, p-heterogeneity: 0.80) and duration of (HR>10yrs vs. Never: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.23-5.58, p-trend: 0.006, p-heterogeneity: 0.30) pre-diagnostic non-aspirin NSAID use. In addition, in the HPFS only, current (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.33-4.17) and duration of (HR>10yrs vs. Never: 1.83, 95% CI: 0.42-7.93, p-trend: 0.07) pre-diagnostic acetaminophen use indicated positive associations with fatal RCC. Analyses of RCC-specific mortality among participants diagnosed with RCC demonstrated an inverse association with current post-diagnostic aspirin use (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.97), but not duration of post-diagnostic aspirin use (HR>10yrs vs. Never: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.53-1.51, p-trend: 0.98). Analgesics were not otherwise associated with RCC survival. Conclusions: Our findings support a potential positive association between non-aspirin NSAID use and incident fatal RCC. It remains possible that analgesics may operate differently in the setting of RCC from the context of other chronic diseases. Citation Format: Rebecca E. Graff, Alejandro Sanchez, Toni K. Choueiri, Meir J. Stampfer, Edward L. Giovannucci, Lorelei A. Mucci, Eunyoung Cho, Mark A. Preston. Analgesic use and renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival: Results from three prospective cohort studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5893.

Prediction Factors of Early Postoperative Bleeding after Bariatric Surgery.

Identifying the possible predictors of postoperative bleeding is advantageous to reduce healthcare costs and promote patients' recovery. The aim of this study was to determine early postoperative bleeding predictors after bariatric surgery. This retrospective study was conducted using data from 2260 patients who underwent bariatric surgery. We diagnosed early postoperative bleeding by the following symptoms: abdominal pain, hypotension, tachycardia, hematemesis, melena, decreased hemoglobin level, the need for at least two units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfusion, and reoperation within the first 48h after surgery. Our results showed the odds of early postoperative bleeding in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) were higher than in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.79 to 6.80). In addition, prior intragastric balloon (IGB) (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.18 to 8.34) and oral non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (OR 5.91, 95% CI 1.79 to 20.63) were positively associated with the occurrence of postoperative bleeding. In contrast, there was an inverse relationship between staple line oversewing and the odds of postoperative bleeding (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.81). After stratification data based on the type of the surgery, the positive association between IGB and the odds of bleeding was constant in the LRYGB group. In the LSG group, use of non-aspirin NSAIDs was linked to a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding, while oversewing of the staple line lowered the incidence of this event. Our results demonstrated a positive association between type of procedure, history of IGB, and oral non-aspirin NSIADs use, as well as an inverse relationship between staple line oversewing and the odds of bleeding after bariatric surgery.

Non-aspirin NSAIDs and head and neck cancer mortality in a Danish nationwide cohort study

BackgroundEvidence suggests that non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have antineoplastic properties of potential importance for survival of head and neck cancer. MethodsWe conducted a nationwide cohort study including all individuals with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in Denmark during 2000–2016 at age 30–84 years, with no history of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer), and alive at 1 year after diagnosis. Nationwide registries provided information on drug use, causes of death and potential confounders, and additional clinical information was obtained for a subpopulation. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between post-diagnosis non-aspirin NSAID use (defined as ≥1 filled prescription within first year after diagnosis) and cancer-specific mortality. ResultsAmong 10,770 head and neck cancer 1-year survivors, the HR for cancer-specific mortality with non-aspirin NSAID use was 1.68 at 1 year after diagnosis, but declined and stabilized around 1.15 (95% CI 1.02–1.29) at 2 years after diagnosis. Among 2-year survivors, the HRs for cancer-specific mortality with non-aspirin NSAID use remained slightly increased in analyses stratified by age, sex, stage, and pre-diagnosis non-aspirin NSAID use. Similar results were seen in the subpopulation (n = 1029) with additional clinical information, and among 5-year survivors with additional non-aspirin NSAID exposure assessment. ConclusionIn this nationwide cohort of patients with head and neck cancer, use of non-aspirin NSAIDs was associated with a slightly increased mortality risk, warranting further evaluation.

Influence of Long-term Nonaspirin NSAID Use on Risk of Frailty in Men ≥60 Years: The Physicians' Health Study.

Inflammation is a central pathway leading to frailty but whether commonly used nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can prevent frailty is unknown. Prospective cohort study of male physicians ≥60 who participated in the Physicians' Health Study. Annual questionnaires collected data on NSAID use, lifestyle, and morbidity. Average annual NSAID use was categorized as 0 days/year, 1-12 days/year, 13-60 days/year, and >60 days/year. Frailty was assessed using a validated 33-item frailty index. Propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to address confounding by indication and logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) of prevalent frailty according to nonaspirin NSAID use. A total of 12 101 male physicians were included (mean age 70 ± 7 years, mean follow-up 11 years). Reported NSAID use was 0 days/year for 2 234, 1-12 days/year for 5 812, 13-60 days/year for 2 833, and >60 days/year for 1 222 participants. A total of 2 413 participants (20%) were frail. Higher self-reported NSAID use was associated with greater alcohol use, smoking, arthritis, hypertension, and heart disease, while less NSAID use was associated with coumadin use and prior bleeding. After propensity score adjustment, all characteristics were balanced. ORs (95% confidence intervals) of prevalent frailty were 0.90 (0.80-1.02), 1.02 (0.89-1.17), and 1.26 (1.07-1.49) for average NSAID use of 1-12 days/year, 13-60 days/year, and >60 days/year, compared to 0 days/year (p-trend < .001). Long-term use of NSAIDs at high frequency is associated with increased risk of frailty among older men. Additional study is needed to understand the role of anti-inflammatory medication in older adults and its implication for overall health.

Recategorization of Non-Aspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs According to Clinical Relevance: Abandoning the Traditional NSAID Terminology

Non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used to treat pain, fever, and inflammation. Historically, NSAIDs have been categorized as traditional NSAIDs and newer cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (coxibs). However, traditional NSAIDs also inhibit the COX-1 and COX-2 enzyme isoforms to a varying degree. This diversity of COX-1 and COX-2 selectivity within the class of traditional NSAIDs has proven clinically important, with evidence accumulating on the cardiovascular risks associated with selective COX-2 inhibition. Thus, the relative COX-2 selectivity of traditional NSAIDs correlates with their cardiovascular risk profile, being more favourable for non-selective NSAIDs, such as naproxen and low-dose ibuprofen, and less favourable for more COX-2 selective agents, such as diclofenac. To enhance clinically relevant terminology, we advocate categorizing all non-aspirin NSAIDs—including traditional NSAIDs—according to their relative COX-1 and COX-2 selectivity as either COX-1 inhibitors, non-selective NSAIDs, or COX-2 inhibitors. We further recommend subcategorizing COX-2 inhibitors as newer COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) or older COX-2 inhibitors. Finally, we recommend examining the effects of the individual NSAIDs included in each of the proposed categories. Adhering to these recommendations will align future studies, advance interpretation of COX-specific adverse cardiovascular effects, and provide better guidance to clinicians prescribing NSAIDs.

Associations of Aspirin and Non-Aspirin Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Diagnosis.

Aspirin use reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but there is limited evidence regarding associations of aspirin and non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with CRC-specific survival. This prospective analysis includes women and men from the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort who were cancer free at baseline (1992 or 1993) and diagnosed with CRC during incidence follow-up through 2015. Detailed information on aspirin and non-aspirin NSAID use was self-reported on questionnaires at baseline, in 1997, and every 2 years thereafter. Pre- and postdiagnosis data were available for 2686 and 1931 participants without distant metastases, respectively, among whom 512 and 251 died from CRC during mortality follow-up through 2016. Secondary analyses examined associations between prediagnosis aspirin use and stage at diagnosis (distant metastatic vs localized or regional). All statistical tests were 2-sided. Long-term regular use of aspirin (>15 times per month) before diagnosis was associated with lower CRC-specific mortality (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52 to 0.92). Postdiagnosis regular aspirin use was not statistically significantly associated with risk of CRC-specific mortality overall (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.09), although participants who began regular aspirin use only after their diagnosis were at lower risk than participants who did not use aspirin at both the pre- and postdiagnosis periods (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.98). Long-term aspirin use before diagnosis was also associated with lower odds of diagnosis with distant metastases (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.99). Our results suggest that long-term aspirin use before a diagnosis of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer may be associated with lower CRC-specific mortality after diagnosis, consistent with possible inhibition of micrometastases before diagnosis.

Risk of Multiple System Atrophy and the Use of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Danish Register-Based Case-Control Study

Introduction: Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a rare rapidly progressive atypical Parkinson disorder presenting clinically with parkinsonism and/or a cerebellar syndrome in combination with dysautonomia. Severe neuroinflammation develops along with hallmark neuropathological changes, and as in Parkinson’s disease, intake of anti-inflammatory medication has been hypothesized to be protective for development of disease. We aimed to investigate if use of non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), low-dose aspirin, or statins were associated with a reduced risk of MSA. Methods: We performed a register-based case-control study in MSA (n = 155) cases and population controls (n= 7,750) matched on age, gender, and place of residency by risk-set sampling. Pharmacological exposure prior to diagnosis was assessed in 2 categories (user vs. nonuser, cumulated dose in tertiles [T1-T3]). In an unconditional logistic regression model, adjusted for age, gender, residency, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we estimated ORs and 95% CIs. Results: Data suggested a trend towards non-aspirin NSAID use to be associated with a decreased risk of MSA (OR 0.72 [95% CI 0.49–1.06]) compared to nonusers, decreasing dose-dependently (T2 OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.43–1.38]; T3 OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.29–1.06]). However, data were based on small numbers. Use of statins and low-dose aspirin was not associated with a decreased risk of MSA. Results were lagged 5 years from index date to address reverse causation. Conclusion: A trend toward use of non-aspirin NSAID and an associated reduced risk of MSA was observed in this study. However, our analyses had limited statistical precision, and further studies including larger sample sizes and longer exposure periods are needed.

Use of nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of head and neck cancer: A nationwide case-control study.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most frequent malignancy with high mortality and substantial morbidity and hence there is a need for identification of preventive factors. Preclinical and observational studies have reported antineoplastic effects of nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but studies of nonaspirin NSAID use and risk of HNC are sparse and with inconsistent results. We therefore conducted a register-based case-control study nested in the entire Danish population. Cases (n = 12,389) comprised all Danish residents aged 30-84 years with a histologically verified primary HNC diagnosis during 2000-2015. Based on the literature, cases were categorized into four groups of anticipated association with human papillomavirus (HPV): strong, potential, no/weak and uncertain. Age- and sex-matched population controls (n = 185,835) were selected by risk-set-sampling. We obtained information on filled prescriptions of nonaspirin NSAIDs, other drug use, comorbid conditions and socioeconomic parameters from nationwide Danish registries. Ever-use (≥2 prescriptions) of nonaspirin NSAIDs was not associated with the overall risk of HNC after adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio [OR]: 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.03). However, long-term consistent use (≥5 years) was associated with a 25% reduction in HNC risk (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.90). Stratified analyses by anticipated HPV-association showed no material differences in estimates. In conclusion, ever-use of nonaspirin NSAIDs was not associated with the risk of HNC with no apparent influence on the estimates by the anticipated HPV-association. However, long-term consistent use may be associated with a reduced risk of HNC and merits further investigation.

New drug candidates for bipolar disorder-A nation-wide population-based study.

Drug repurposing is an increasingly promising idea in many fields of medicine. We systematically used Danish nation-wide population-based registers to investigate whether continued use of non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), low-dose aspirin, high-dose aspirin, statins, allopurinol, and angiotensin agents decrease the rate of incident mania/bipolar disorder. A nation-wide population-based longitudinal study using Poisson regression analyses including all persons in Denmark who purchased the exposure medication of interest and a random sample of 30% of the Danish population. The follow-up period comprised a 10years period from 2005 to 2015. Two different outcome measures were included, (1) a diagnosis of mania/bipolar disorder at a psychiatric hospital contact as inpatient or outpatient and (2) a combined measure of a diagnosis of mania/bipolar disorder or initiation of lithium use. A total of 1,605,365 subjects were exposed to one of the six drugs of interest during the exposure period from 2005 to 2015, median age 57years [quartiles: 43;69], and female proportion of 53.1%. Continued use of low-dose aspirin, statins, and angiotensin agents were associated with decreased rates of incident mania/bipolar disorder on both outcome measures. Continued uses of non-aspirin NSAIDs as well as high-dose aspirin were associated with an increased rate of incident bipolar disorder. There were no statistically significant associations for allopurinol. The study supports the potential of agents acting on inflammation and the stress response system in bipolar disorder and illustrates that population-based registers can be used to systematically identify drugs with repurposing potentials.

Use of aspirin, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen and risk of endometrial cancer: the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium.

Regular use of aspirin has been associated with a reduced risk of cancer at several sites but the data for endometrial cancer are conflicting. Evidence regarding use of other analgesics is limited. We pooled individual-level data from seven cohort and five case-control studies participating in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium including 7120 women with endometrial cancer and 16 069 controls. For overall analyses, study-specific odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression and combined using random-effects meta-analysis; for stratified analyses, we used mixed-effects logistic regression with study as a random effect. At least weekly use of aspirin and non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was associated with an approximately 15% reduced risk of endometrial cancer among both overweight and obese women (OR = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] and 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.97], respectively, for aspirin; 0.87 [95% CI 0.76-1.00] and 0.84 [0.74-0.96], respectively, for non-aspirin NSAIDs). There was no association among women of normal weight (body mass index < 25 kg/m2, Pheterogeneity = 0.04 for aspirin, Pheterogeneity = 0.003 for NSAIDs). Among overweight and obese women, the inverse association with aspirin was stronger for use 2-6 times/week (OR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96) than for daily use (0.91, 0.80-1.03), possibly because a high proportion of daily users use low-dose formulations. There was no clear association with use of acetaminophen. Our pooled analysis provides further evidence that use of standard-dose aspirin or other NSAIDs may reduce risk of endometrial cancer among overweight and obese women.

Nonaspirin NSAIDs and contralateral breast cancer risk.

Laboratory studies suggest that inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 enzymes inhibits breast cancer development. We aimed to evaluate whether postdiagnosis use of COX-2 selective or other nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among Danish breast cancer patients. From the clinical database of the Danish Breast Cancer Group, we identified 52,723 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1996 and 2012. Data on nonaspirin NSAID use, CBC and potential confounding variables were obtained from nationwide registries. We defined postdiagnosis use (two or more prescriptions) as a time-varying covariate with a one-year lag. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CBC associated with nonaspirin NSAID use. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range: 2.3-9 years), 1,444 patients were diagnosed with CBC. Overall, postdiagnosis use of nonaspirin NSAID was associated with an adjusted HR for CBC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.87-1.11). The HRs did not vary substantially with duration or intensity of nonaspirin NSAID use. Moreover, similar associations were found for COX-2 selective (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.85-1.23) and nonselective (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.82-1.13) nonaspirin NSAIDs. In conclusion, our nationwide cohort study of breast cancer patients does not suggest a reduced risk of CBC with nonaspirin NSAID use regardless of the COX-2 selectivity.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase MRP4 expression in an endometriotic epithelial cell line in a PPARa dependent manner.

Endometriosis is a debilitating disease characterized by chronic inflammation. The transporter multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4/ABCC4) is expressed in human endometrial tissue; it is overexpressed in ectopic endometrial tissue, and is modulated by the anti-inflammatory lipid Lipoxin A4 (LXA4). Recently, it was demonstrated that aspirin induces platelet MRP4 over-expression, through genomic modulation in megakaryocytes. Since patients with endometriosis frequently use aspirin or other non-aspirin Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), the aim of this study was to verify whether aspirin and other NSAIDs enhance MRP4 expression in 12Z human endometriotic epithelial cells and whether this was peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARa) dependent. MRP4 and PPARa expression was analyzed by Q-RT-PCR using TaqMan® Master Mix and TaqMan® Assay Reagents (Life Technologies, Monza, Italy) and Western blot. In 12Z cells, aspirin and other NSAIDs enhanced MRP4 mRNA and protein expression; these treatments also induced PPARa expression. Aspirin and diclofenac-induced increases in MRP4 expression were not observed in cells where PPARa was knocked down using siRNA. NSAIDs-induced MRP4 expression was correlated with augmented PGE2 secretion, indicating functional relevance. MRP4 expression was increased in cells treated with NSAIDs and the nuclear receptor PPARa is involved. Elevated PGE2 levels in cell supernatants correlate with its increased transport by MRP4 after NSAID treatment. More importantly, we provide evidence that in endometriotic epithelial cells aspirin and non-aspirin NSAIDs treatments alter gene expression.

Association of Analgesic Use With Risk of Ovarian Cancer in the Nurses’ Health Studies

Ovarian cancer is a highly fatal malignant neoplasm with few modifiable risk factors. Case-control studies have reported a modest reduced risk of ovarian cancer among women who frequently use aspirin or regularly use low-dose aspirin. To evaluate whether regular aspirin or nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and patterns of use are associated with lower ovarian cancer risk. This cohort study analyzed NSAID use and ovarian cancer diagnosis data from 2 prospective cohorts, 93 664 women in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), who were followed up from 1980 to 2014, and 111 834 in the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII), who were followed up from 1989 to 2015. Follow-up was completed on June 30, 2014, for the NHS and June 30, 2015, for NHSII. Data were analyzed from June 13, 2016, to September 18, 2017. For each analgesic type (aspirin, low-dose aspirin, nonaspirin NSAIDs, and acetaminophen), timing, duration, frequency, and number of tablets used were evaluated; exposure information was updated every 2 to 4 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for associations of aspirin, nonaspirin NSAIDs, and acetaminophen with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. All statistical tests were 2-sided, with a significance level of .05. In the NHS, the mean (SD) age at baseline (1980) was 45.9 (7.2) years, and 93% of participants identified as non-Hispanic white. In the NHSII, the mean age at baseline (1989) was 34.2 (4.7) years, and 92% identified as non-Hispanic white. Among the 205 498 women in both cohorts, there were 1054 cases of incident epithelial ovarian cancer. Significant associations between aspirin and ovarian cancer risk were not observed when current vs nonuse of any aspirin was evaluated regardless of dose (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.19). However, when low-dose (≤100-mg) and standard-dose (325-mg) aspirin were evaluated separately, an inverse association for low-dose aspirin (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96), but no association for standard-dose aspirin (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.49) was observed. Current use of nonaspirin NSAIDs was positively associated with risk of ovarian cancer compared with nonuse (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00-1.41), and significant positive trends for duration of use (P = .02 for trend) and cumulative average tablets per week (P = .03 for trend) were observed. There were no clear associations for the use of acetaminophen. These results appear to be consistent with case-control studies that show a reduced risk of ovarian cancer among regular users of low-dose aspirin. An increased risk of ovarian cancer with long-term high-quantity use of other analgesics, particularly nonaspirin NSAIDs, was observed, although this finding requires confirmation.

Use of paracetamol, low-dose aspirin, or non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of ovarian borderline tumors in Denmark

ObjectiveFew studies have examined ovarian borderline tumor (BOT) risk associated with analgesics, and with inconclusive findings. The aim was to examine serous borderline tumor (SBT) or mucinous borderline tumor (MBT) risk associated with use of paracetamol, low-dose aspirin, or non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). MethodsWe identified all women with SBTs or MBTs in the Danish Pathology Data Bank, 1997–2015. Using risk-set sampling, we randomly selected 15 controls per case. We excluded women with previous cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) and controls with bilateral oophorectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy. Information on redeemed prescriptions of medications/confounders was identified from nationwide registries. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsWe observed a decreased MBT risk among recent paracetamol users (OR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.60–0.98), but no association with SBTs. Regarding non-aspirin NSAIDs, we found an increased SBT risk with recent (OR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.11–1.51) and former use (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.04–1.37), and an elevated MBT risk with recent use (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.97–1.33). Low-dose aspirin use did not seem related with SBT risk, and the association with MBTs was unclear. ConclusionsNo strong associations between the examined medications and BOTs were observed. However, our nationwide case-control study may suggest that recent paracetamol use could have a chemopreventive effect on MBTs, whereas neither low-dose aspirin nor non-aspirin NSAIDs use seem to protect against SBTs or MBTs. Larger studies are needed to firmly establish a potential association between these medications and BOT risk.

Pre-diagnosis and post-diagnosis use of common analgesics and ovarian cancer prognosis (NHS/NHSII): a cohort study.

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer death among women in the USA. In this study, our objective was to determine whether modifiable exposures to common analgesics outside of standard treatment influence prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. The Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII) are ongoing prospective studies of 121 700 and 116 429 US nurses who have completed biennial questionnaires since 1976 and 1989, respectively. We retrieved information from medical records, death certificates, or linkage to a state or Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry on ovarian cancer cases. Eligible participants had confirmed invasive, stage I-III epithelial ovarian cancer, and had data available on analgesic use. The primary objective was to determine whether self-reported regular use (≥2 days per week) of aspirin, non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or paracetamol before and after ovarian cancer diagnosis, was associated with ovarian cancer-specific survival. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for these associations, adjusting for age and year of diagnosis, disease stage, and histology. Between June 1, 1976, and May 31, 2012, for the NHS and between June 1, 1989, and May 31, 2013, for NHSII, 1789 participants of the NHS and NHSII studies were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer and 1143 (64%) were eligible to be included in this study; 1031 (90%) of 1143 cases were included in the pre-diagnosis exposure analysis and 964 cases (84%) in the post-diagnosis exposure analysis. Compared with never-users, participants who reported recent (current use in the past 2 years) post-diagnosis use of aspirin (HR 0·68 [95% CI 0·52-0·89]) and non-aspirin NSAIDs (HR 0·67 [95% CI 0·51-0·87]) had an improved ovarian cancer-specific survival. Any type of analgesic use pre-diagnosis, and post-diagnosis use of paracetamol, were not positively associated with ovarian cancer-specific survival. In analyses of change in analgesic use from pre-diagnosis to post-diagnosis, those participants who became recent users of aspirin (HR 0·44 [95% CI 0·26-0·74]) or became recent users of non-aspirin NSAIDs (HR 0·46 [95% CI 0·29-0·73]) post-diagnosis had a lower risk of ovarian cancer-specific death than never-users. Recent use of aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs, defined as current use in the past 2 years, after diagnosis appears to improve ovarian cancer-specific survival. If these results are confirmed in further studies, further research should explore potential synergistic effects of anti-inflammatory medications used in combination with standard ovarian cancer therapies to improve the prognosis for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, The Marsha Rivkin Center for Ovarian Cancer Research.

Non-aspirin NSAID use and ovarian cancer mortality

ObjectivePreclinical studies suggest that non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may improve survival of ovarian cancer. We examined the association between non-aspirin NSAID use and ovarian cancer mortality. MethodsAll women in Denmark with a first diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer between 2000 and 2012 were identified. We obtained information on drug use, mortality outcomes, and potential confounding factors from nationwide registries. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between postdiagnosis non-aspirin NSAID use (≥1 prescription) and ovarian cancer-specific or other-cause mortality compared with non-use (no prescriptions). The influence of competing risks was evaluated using the sub-distribution hazards model proposed by Fine and Gray. ResultsAmong 4117 patients, any postdiagnosis use of non-aspirin NSAIDs was not associated with either ovarian cancer (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.87–1.08) or other-cause (HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.77–1.27) mortality, however, inverse associations for ovarian cancer mortality were observed with high cumulative (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.94) or high-intensity (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.72–1.03) postdiagnosis use of non-aspirin NSAIDs. The associations differed substantially with histological subtype of ovarian cancer, with only inverse associations observed for serous ovarian cancer (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77–0.99). Among a smaller number of patients with a non-serous tumor, postdiagnosis non-aspirin NSAID use was associated with increased ovarian cancer mortality. ConclusionsAny postdiagnosis use of non-aspirin NSAIDs did not influence ovarian cancer mortality overall, however, more intensive use was associated with improved survival of serous ovarian cancer.

Regular Use of Aspirin or Non-Aspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Is Not Associated With Risk of Incident Pancreatic Cancer in Two Large Cohort Studies

Use of aspirin and/or non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduces the risk of several cancers, but it is not clear if use of these drugs is associated with risk of pancreatic cancer. We evaluated aspirin and non-aspirin NSAID use and risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 141,940 participants from theHealth Professionals Follow-up Study and Nurses' HealthStudy using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression. We considered several exposure classifications to model differing lag times between NSAID exposure and cancer development. We also conducted a nested case-control study of participants from 3 prospective cohorts using conditional logistic regression to evaluate pre-diagnosis levels of plasma salicylurate, a major metabolite of aspirin,in396 pancreatic cancer cases and 784 matched individuals without pancreatic cancer (controls). In the prospective cohort study, 1122 participants developed pancreatic adenocarcinoma over 4.2 million person-years. Use of aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs was not associated with pancreatic cancer risk, even after considering several latency exposure classifications. In a pre-planned subgroup analysis, regular aspirin use was associated with reduced pancreatic cancer risk among participants with diabetes (relative risk, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.94). In the nested case-control study, pre-diagnosis levels of salicylurate were notassociated with pancreatic cancer risk (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.72-1.61; Ptrend 0.81; comparing participants in thehighest quintile with those in the lowest quintile of plasma salicylurate). Regular aspirin or non-aspirin NSAID use was not associated with future risk of pancreatic cancer in participants from several large prospective cohort studies. A possible reduction in risk for pancreatic cancer among people with diabetes who regularly use aspirin should be further examined in preclinical and human studies.

Cardiovascular Safety and Bleeding Risk Associated with Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Medications in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.

Nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used medications worldwide. There has been growing concern regarding the cardiovascular risks associated with NSAID use (both selective cyclooxygenase [COX]-2 inhibitors and nonselective NSAIDs). This review will examine the evidence pertaining to cardiovascular safety and bleeding risk related to nonaspirin NSAIDs. Earlier studies exposed the cardiovascular risks associated with use of selective COX-2 inhibitors; however, further studies have shown that even nonselective COX inhibition may lead to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Data have also suggested that nonaspirin NSAIDs carry a higher bleeding risk in patients on antithrombotic therapy. Nonaspirin NSAIDs may confer an increased risk of both adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding complications, regardless of COX selectivity and duration of use. Thus, it remains important to limit their use whenever possible, especially in patients with established cardiovascular disease.

Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of candidate agents (low and high dose aspirin, non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), calcium, vitamin D, folic acid, alone or in combination)...

Cardiovascular safety of non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: review and position paper by the working group for Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy of the European Society of Cardiology.

Non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used in clinical practice for more than a century and are among the most widely used drugs worldwide for the treatment of pain, fever, and inflammation.1,2 For decades, it has been known that many of these drugs can cause fluid retention and elevate blood pressure,3 thus increasing cardiovascular risk particularly in heart failure patients.4 However, the main worry in relation to the use of these agents has been gastrointestinal bleeding.5 Newer selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) were developed as NSAIDs with reduced gastrointestinal toxicity, but retained analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. Coxibs were tested in accordance to modern drug development regulations with large numbers of patients included in clinical trials. These trials demonstrated that rofecoxib,6–8 celecoxib,9 valdecoxib,10 and parecoxib10 increased the risk of cardiovascular complications. As a result, coxibs currently have very limited indications for use. Paradoxically, an older and relatively selective COX-2 inhibitor, diclofenac,11 continues to be one of the most widely used drugs worldwide and is in most countries sold over the counter.1 Mixed COX-1/COX-2 inhibitors such as ibuprofen and naproxen are also used widely and, without solid evidence, assumed to be safe. Given the current uncertainty regarding the safety of this class of agents and the rapidly accumulating data on their cardiovascular risks, this review summarizes the current evidence from randomized and observational studies on the cardiovascular safety of non-aspirin NSAIDs and presents a position for their use. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs exhibit their anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting COX, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in prostaglandin synthesis ( Figure 1 ).12 There are …