Nonacademic Centers Research Articles

Abstract 4118777: Outcomes Of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy In Academic Versus Non-Academic Centers: Analysis from the National Inpatient Sample Database 2012-2020

Introduction: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an uncommon heart condition associated with serious complications. Advances in medicine have improved its prognosis. Despite this, such potentially life-saving improvements concerning the implementation of best practices are not ubiquitous; guidelines recommend management at specialized centers. Unfortunately, not all hospitals have specialized HCM centers. However, given that a sizeable portion of these specialists are also in academic centers (ACs), we hypothesize that ACs may be better positioned than non-academic centers to provide the highest quality care for HCM patients. Purpose: Our study aimed to assess in-hospital outcomes and healthcare burdens among patient admissions with HCM diagnoses, comparing those treated at academic centers with those receiving care at non-academic centers. We examine all-cause in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, and investigate ethnic differences in patients with HCM. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database was utilized to obtain HCM patient hospitalizations from 2012 through 2020 in the United States. Patient hospitalizations for which adult patients had a primary diagnosis of HCM were identified. Outcomes included all-cause in-hospital death, LOS, and hospital costs. All-cause in-hospital mortality was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Multivariable lognormal regression models were used to estimate LOS and inflation adjusted cost outcomes. Results: All-cause mortality unadjusted rates were 2.2% in non-teaching hospitals compared with 1.7% at teaching hospitals; however, this difference was not statistically significant ( p =.235). Both unadjusted and adjusted hospital LOS were 32% shorter for non-teaching hospitals ( p <.001). Both unadjusted and adjusted hospital costs were 46% lower for non-teaching hospitals compared to teaching hospitals ( p <.001; $37,829 vs $70,216). For both LOS and cost, the overall interaction between race and teaching status was statistically significant ( p < .001.) Conclusion: Our study shows variations in hospital outcomes and costs between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Non-teaching hospitals displayed shorter stays and lower costs. Additionally, the interaction of race and teaching status significantly impacted length of stay and costs. These results underscore the necessity of tailored interventions to address healthcare delivery and resource inequities, especially in teaching hospitals.

Treatment trends in patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy.

The objective of this study is to assess the trends in treatment selection for patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy. This multicenter retrospective study included 595 patients treated with either upfront combination therapy (upfront novel hormonal therapies and taxane-based chemotherapy) or vintage therapy (androgen deprivation therapy with or without bicalutamide) between 2016 and 2021. High tumor burden metastatic disease was defined when a patient met the CHAARTED or LATITUDE criteria. We evaluated trends in treatment selection and reasons for selecting vintage therapy. Of the 595, 123 and 472 patients were classified as having low and high tumor-burden disease, respectively. The Use of upfront combination therapy was found to be rapidly increasing with utilization rates of 72% and 54% in 2021 for high and low tumor-burden disease, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found older age, poor performance status, and nonacademic center were significantly associated with the selection of vintage therapy. Of the 163 patients who received vintage hormone therapy after approval of upfront therapy, 74.2% had a specific reason for avoiding upfront therapy. The reasons for selecting vintage therapy included refusal (39.8%), older age (67.6%), frailty (56.3%), and comorbidity (40.8%). Furthermore, 16.9% of patients declined upfront combination therapy due to cost concerns. Upfront combination therapy use has 72% and 54% prevalence among patients with high and low tumor burden diseases, respectively, in this current practice. Older age, poor performance status, and facility bias were negatively associated with the use of upfront combination therapy.

Addressing the Neck: An NCDB Study of Clinically Node-Negative Supraglottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Identify the proportion of patients undergoing elective neck dissection (END) in surgically managed supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCCa), assess associations between patient, tumor, and treatment factors with END, and assess associations between neck management and overall survival (OS). Retrospective study. National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2019 Participant User File. Patients with previously untreated, clinically node-negative (cN0) supraglottic SCCa treated with partial laryngectomy were queried from NCDB. Patients without known neck management and who underwent total laryngectomy were excluded. Patient and tumor factors associated with END were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Univariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to examine associations between patient factors and OS, and factors with P < .05 were included on multivariable analysis. A total of 1352 patients met eligibility criteria. Eight hundred eleven (60%) patients had END performed with occult nodal metastasis identified in 177 (22%) patients. END was more likely to be performed at academic centers than nonacademic centers (odds ratio: [1.66], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.09, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, patients who underwent adjuvant radiation had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.13-3.29, P = .017). END was associated with improved OS overall on univariable analysis (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69-0.98, P = .026), but not on multivariable analysis. In this NCDB study, 22% of cN0 supraglottic SCCa patients had occult nodal metastatic disease. Despite this, 40% of patients do not receive END at the time of primary resection. Patients who receive END for supraglottic SCCa are more likely to avoid adjuvant radiation without impacting OS.

Recent Trends and Challenges in Employment for Emergency Medicine Trainees: A Survey of Graduating Residents' Perspectives.

The landscape of the emergency medicine (EM) workforce has undergone significant changes recently, posing challenges for residents who are about to graduate from EM training programs. The objective of this study was to survey graduating residents' perceptions of the recent EM job market. We conducted a cross-sectional survey study involving EM residents from programs in New York and New Jersey between August 2021 and November 2021. The survey consisted of 12 multiple-choice questions that focused on graduating EM residents' perceptions of the EM job market, its impact on their job search, and their interest in pursuing fellowship training. During the study period, 436 survey results were collected from 26 EM residency programs. Of the 418 respondents, 233 (56%) expressed their intention to start their job search earlier than their counterparts in previous years, as highlighted by the survey. Among respondents, 141 (76%) postgraduate year (PGY)-2, 139 (79%) PGY-3, and 47 (85%) PGY-4 residents anticipated a challenging job search. Nearly 90% of respondents believed that the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic would affect both academic and nonacademic medical centers in terms of job openings. A total of 248 (59%) were interested in pursuing a fellowship after residency. Most residents preferred job opportunities on the East and West Coasts of the United States. The findings highlight the increasing competitiveness and challenges residents face in securing their first job, the declining interest in pursuing fellowships as residents progress in their training, and the geographic preferences for job opportunities.

Stage IA papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: effectiveness of cryoablation and partial nephrectomy

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of cryoablation compared to partial nephrectomy in patients with stage IA papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (pRCC; chRCC).Material and methodsThe 2004–2016 National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients with stage IA pRCC or chRCC treated with cryoablation or partial nephrectomy. Patients receiving systemic therapy or radiotherapy, as well as those with bilateral RCC or prior malignant disease were excluded. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan–Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Nearest neighbor propensity matching (1:1 cryoablation:partial nephrectomy, stratified for pRCC and chRCC) was used to account for potential confounders.ResultsA total of 11122 stage IA renal cell carcinoma patients were included (pRCC 8030; chRCC 3092). Cryoablation was performed in 607 (5.5%) patients, and partial nephrectomy in 10515 (94.5%) patients. A higher likelihood of cryoablation treatment was observed in older patients with non-private healthcare insurance, as well as in those with smaller diameter low-grade pRCC treated at non-academic centers in specific US geographic regions. After propensity score matching to account for confounders, there was no statistically significant difference in OS comparing cryoablation vs partial nephrectomy in patients with pRCC (HR = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.96–1.75, p = 0.09) and those with chRCC (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.67–2.82, p = 0.38).ConclusionAfter accounting for confounders, cryoablation, and partial nephrectomy demonstrated comparable OS in patients with stage IA papillary and chromophobe RCC. Cryoablation is a reasonable treatment alternative to partial nephrectomy for these histological RCC subtypes when radiologically suspected or diagnosed after biopsy.Critical relevance statementCryoablation might be considered as an upfront treatment alternative to partial nephrectomy in patients with papillary and chromophobe stage IA renal cell carcinoma, as both treatment approaches yield comparable oncological outcomes.Key PointsThe utilization of cryoablation for stage IA papillary and chromophobe RCC increases.In the National Cancer Database, we found specific patterns of use of cryoablation.Cryoablation and partial nephrectomy demonstrate comparable outcomes after accounting for confounders.Graphical

Impact of Facility Type on Survival in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: A Propensity Score Matched, National Cancer Database Analysis

BackgroundChronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare and likely underdiagnosed hematologic malignancy. Due to its rarity and nuances in diagnosis, many patients are referred to tertiary referral centers, although many continue to be cared for in the community setting. Given discrepancies in outcomes based on facility type in related myeloid malignancies, we hypothesized that CMML patients treated at academic centers may have improved survival as compared to patients treated at nonacademic centers (NACs). Patients and MethodsUsing the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified 6290 patients with CMML and collected data on demographics, comorbidities, treatment, and survival. We also performed a propensity matched analysis to control for baseline differences. ResultsWe found that patients at academic centers had higher median overall survival (OS) (17.7 months vs 14.7 months) and 5-year OS (19.1% vs 15.3%) than patients at NACs. In addition, patients treated at an academic center were also more likely to receive hematopoietic stem cell transplant as compared to those treated at NACs. Time to treatment initiation was overall similar between academic and NACs. ConclusionOur study of one of the largest available datasets of CMML patients supports the importance of referring CMML patients to academic centers upon diagnosis to optimize outcomes in this rare hematologic malignancy.

Impact of treatment setting on survival outcomes in undifferentiated pancreatic carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database.

e16333 Background: Undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas is a rare and highly aggressive form of pancreatic cancer, characterized by its low degree of cellular differentiation. The prognosis for this condition remains poor, with median survival times typically not exceeding one year. While existing research indicates that treatment at academic institutions may lead to improved survival outcomes compared to non-academic settings, there is scant research on this topic in the context of undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas. Addressing this research gap, this study analyzes data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare long-term survival rates between patients treated at academic institutions and those at other facilities. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients diagnosed with undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas from 2004 to 2019 using the histology code 8020 as assigned by the Commission on Cancer Accreditation program. Kaplan-Meier, ANOVA, and Chi-Square tests were performed. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 27 and statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. Results: In this analysis of 284 patients, 124 (43.7%) received care at academic centers, while 160 (56.3%) were treated at non-academic institutions. Individuals treated at academic centers had a significantly extended mean overall survival of 27 months compared to 13.9 months for those treated elsewhere (p &lt; 0.05). Additionally, patients at academic centers were more likely to be insured, undergo surgical interventions, receive chemotherapy, and be initially diagnosed at a different facility (p &lt; 0.05). Conversely, patients at non-academic centers were more likely to be white, live closer to their care facility, and exhibit greater metastatic regional lymph nodes (p &lt; 0.05). However, there was no significant association between treatment at academic centers and variables such as median income, cancer grade, and Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CDCI) (p &gt; 0.05). Conclusions: This study revealed that individuals with undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas receiving treatment at academic centers exhibit a significantly improved overall survival rate compared to those treated at non-academic centers. This disparity in survival rates might be attributed to the higher prevalence of chemotherapeutic treatments and surgical interventions at academic institutions. While these observations are based on correlational data, they underscore the necessity for further investigation to establish causality.

Clinical outcomes of patients receiving venetoclax and hypomethylating agents for AML in academic and academic-community partnerships.

e23235 Background: Prior studies have reported improved outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in academic over nonacademic settings potentially due to the availability of multidisciplinary teams, clinical trials and increased resources (1,2). Our institution has partnered with community practices to further evaluate this disparity. In this study, we analyzed treatment outcomes when nonacademic centers partnered with academic centers to treat AML using a regimen of venetoclax and a hypomethylating agent. Methods: We reviewed 92 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with venetoclax and either decitabine or azacitidine at an academic center (n = 57) or community practice with academic center support (n = 35). When partnering with the community, patients received the first cycle of therapy at an academic center. Before discharge, our team completed financial screening, scheduled follow up appointments and provided prescriptions. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) with a secondary evaluation of differences in chemotherapy management and complications. Results: Patients in the academic setting tended to have more adverse risk disease (80.7% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.36) according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) (table). The overall survival (OS) of all patients was 10.7 months (95% CI 9.4-15.7) with no significant difference between the groups. The ORR was similar between the community and academic settings (40.0% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.46). The complete remission (CR) rate was 11.4% in the community versus 19.3% in the academic setting (p = 0.67), and the CR rates were improved in the academic group versus the community after cycle 2 (12.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.72) and cycle 3 (25.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.46). Adverse events were comparable, except for increased rates of fatigue (80.7 vs. 54.3%, p = 0.01) and diarrhea (33.3 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.04) in the academic setting. Conclusions: Contrary to prior studies, our evaluation and ongoing partnerships support the transition of AML treatment to a community setting with academic consultation. Although there were some differences in adverse events, the OS and ORR were similar. Furthermore, this study did not identify any significant safety concerns that could prevent patients from receiving this regimen in either setting. Our goal is to continue evaluating this partnership, as we design prospective studies to improve the care of this patient population. 1. Giri S et al. OS of AML Treated at Academic Center Vs Nonacademic Center. Blood 2015. 2. Halpern AB et al. Practice patterns &amp; outcomes for adults with AML. Hematol Am Soc 2020.[Table: see text]

Increasing Diversity in Academic Medicine Via a Strategic Intermural Housestaff Leadership Development Program.

By 2055, the United States will no longer have a single race or ethnic majority. As the nation's demographics change, the field of medicine must also change to meet the needs of diverse patients. In 2013, UT Southwestern Medical Center implemented the Housestaff Emerging Academy of Leaders (HEAL) program, which provides leadership development skills and training to underrepresented in medicine physician residents in preparation for academic medicine careers. Program leaders hypothesized that by providing housestaff with structured mentorship, career coaching, and individualized development plans, HEAL would increase interest in pursuing academic careers and prepare residents for faculty positions. HEAL has since expanded to graduate medical education programs nationwide. From 2013 to 2018, HEAL included housestaff at UT Southwestern and other Texas medical centers, totaling 392 enrollees. In 2019, the program increased to include housestaff from around the country. The first HEAL USA program had 39 housestaff, which increased to 173 in 2019, including 60 faculty from 31 U.S. academic medical centers. The 2019 HEAL USA preassessment survey (32 trainee responses) revealed that 10 (31%) of the housestaff were "extremely interested" in academic medicine, but only 1 (3%) felt "extremely confident" to pursue an academic medicine career. Postassessment responses to these same items (5 trainee responses) were 3 (60%) and 1 (20%), respectively, with 3 (60%) also feeling "extremely prepared" (1 [20%]) or "very prepared" (2 [40%]) to pursue an academic medicine career. Of 70 evaluable participants who attended at least 2 sessions and have graduated from residency, 47 (67%) have attained academic faculty positions, whereas 23 (33%) have pursued positions at nonacademic centers. The next steps for HEAL USA will be continued expansion to additional medical centers and effective delivery of career development and leadership training to encourage participants to pursue academic medical careers.

Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus: Is Esophagectomy Associated with Improved Overall Survival?

Esophagectomy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is challenging and carries risk. The value of esophagectomy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is not well-defined. The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with cT4 esophageal adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2020. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with use of esophagectomy. Cox modeling was used to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing esophagectomy were 1:1 propensity score-matched to patients treated nonsurgically. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare 5-year overall survival (OS). A total of 3,703 patients met inclusion criteria. Of those, 541 (15%) underwent esophagectomy, and 3,162 (85%) did not. Age 65 years or less (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.69, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.14), White race (aOR 2.98, 95% CI 2.24 to 3.96), treatment in academic centers (aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.02), private insurance (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.36), and tumors less than 6 cm (aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.40) were associated with use of esophagectomy. Government of lack of insurance (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.35), income <$46,000 (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.20), treatment in nonacademic centers (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.25), Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index 1 or more (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.32), and tumors 6 cm or more (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.32) were associated with risk of all-cause mortality. Esophagectomy (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.56) and systemic therapy (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.43) were associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing esophagectomy had higher rates of 5-year OS (27.4% vs 13.2%, p < 0.0001) and longer median OS (24.71 vs 10.09 months, p < 0.0001). Among cT4b patients, those who underwent esophagectomy had higher rates of 5-year OS (24.5% vs 12.3%, p < 0.0001) and longer median OS (25.53 vs 11.01 months, p < 0.0001). In cT4 esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophagectomy is associated with improved rates of 5-year OS compared with nonsurgical treatment.

Genetic literacy among primary care physicians in a resource-constrained setting

BackgroundGenetic literacy among primary healthcare providers is crucial for appropriate patient care with the advances in genetic and genomic medicine. Studies from high-income countries highlight the lack of knowledge in genetics and the need to develop curricula for continuing professional development of non-geneticists. Scarce data is available from resource-constrained countries in Middle East and North Africa. Lebanon is a small country in this region characterized by high rates of consanguinity and genetic disorders like several surrounding countries, such as Jordan, Syria, and Turkey.MethodsThe primary aim of this study assessed the genetic literacy, self-perceived and actual knowledge as well as practices among primary care providers in Lebanon. The secondary aim identified their educational needs and proposed evidence-based continuing education programs. A cross-sectional survey-based study, using a self-administered questionnaire, was conducted targeting physicians from Family Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Pediatrics. The questionnaire was divided into five sections: demographics, familiarity with genetic tests, self-reported and actual knowledge, genetic practices, and educational needs. Statistics were performed using SPSS v24. The Chi-square test was used for independent variables. Differences between mean scores were measured using paired sample t-tests for groups of two levels and one-way ANOVA for more than two. Multiple linear regression was used to study the variables associated with the knowledge score while controlling for other variables.ResultsThe survey included 123 physicians. They were mostly familiar with karyotype as first-tier genetic test. Although 38% perceived their knowledge as good, only 6% scored as such in knowledge assessment. A better knowledge score was observed in academic institutions as well as in urban settings (p<0.05). One third never ordered any genetic testing, mostly due to poor knowledge. Almost all (98%) were ready to attend continuing professional development sessions in genetics.ConclusionOur findings show the need to improve genetic literacy among healthcare frontliners, focusing on remote regions and nonacademic centers in Lebanon, a model for other resource-constrained country in the Middle East and North Africa region. This study advances recommendations for evidence-based genetic continuing education programs and highlighted the role of that the few genetic specialists can play in their successful implementation.

Prolonged length of stay and omission of adjuvant therapy are associated with early mortality after pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection

BackgroundSurgical resection is the preferred treatment for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but post-resection survival is highly variable. We use the National Cancer Database Participant Use Files to investigate risk factors associated with early mortality (survival less than one year) after pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection. Methods51,345 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified. 16,234 had survival between three months and one year (early mortality), and 35,111 had survival greater than one year. Descriptive analyses and multivariate Cox regression models were performed to identify demographic, perioperative, and tumor biology factors associated with early mortality. A sub-analysis subsequently explored the relationship between the length of stay and chemotherapy utilization. ResultsOf the 51,345 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 16,234 had early mortality. In multivariate models adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, facility type, tumor characteristics, and hospital risk factors, patients with early mortality also had longer lengths of stay, more unplanned readmissions. They were more likely to receive treatment at non-academic centers. Adjuvant chemotherapy utilization was lower in patients with early mortality, particularly in those with longer lengths of stay. ConclusionReducing the length of stay, decreasing variability across different forms of health insurance, and increasing access to treatment at academic centers may reduce early mortality. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a reduced risk of early mortality but is highly underutilized, especially in patients with prolonged hospital stays. Given that delays in receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with an increased risk of early mortality, interventions to decrease perioperative complications to ensure timely access to adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival.

Abstract WP29: Early Adopter of Intravenous Tenecteplase: Two Year Clinical Experience in a Non-Academic Suburban Comprehensive Stroke Center for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment

Background: The most recent American Heart Association/American Stroke Association acute ischemic stroke guidelines recognize tenecteplase (TNK) as an alternative to alteplase (ALT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment. TNK has a longer half-life, and is given as a single intravenous bolus compared to the complex and cumbersome ALT administration. A switch to TNK was implemented at our Comprehensive Stroke center (CSC) after a rigorous training of nurses and providers on May 1, 2021. We sought to evaluate the comparative performance of two thrombolytics over the period of last two years of ALT and first two years on TNK use. Methods: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected database of consecutive AIS patients treated with ALT between May 2019 to April 2021 and those who received TNK from May 2021 to April 2023 at our CSC. Data samples were analyzed with respect to baseline patient characteristics, stroke severity, Door to Needle (DTN) time, 90 day Modified Rankin Scores (MRS), complications, and cost savings. Statistical analyzes were used for between group comparisons (SPSS). Results: A total of 115 patients were treated with ALT and 134 - with TNK. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or stroke severity between the groups (mean NIHSS of 10 for both). The mean DTN was 53.0 minutes for ALT and 41.5 minutes for TNK (p&lt;0.001). There was a strong trend towards improved 90-day clinical outcomes for TNK-treated patients (mRS 2.5 vs 3.1, p=0.06). No significant differences in rates of symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (SICH) were observed between two groups (2.6% ALT vs 2.9% TNK). Estimated cost savings of TNK use over two year period were $75,102. Conclusion: Our real-world data suggests that intravenous TNK for AIS appears to be safe and may result in improved clinical outcomes and substantial cost savings compared to ALT.

The influence of facility type on intracranial meningioma treatment and outcomes: predicting overall survival using the National Cancer Database.

There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating improved outcomes for patients with CNS neoplasms treated at academic centers (ACs) versus nonacademic centers (non-ACs), which represents a potential healthcare disparity within neurosurgery. In this paper, the authors sought to investigate the relationship between facility type and surgical outcomes in meningioma patients. The National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients diagnosed with intracranial meningioma between 2004 and 2019. Patients were stratified by facility type, and the Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher exact test were used for bivariate comparisons of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess whether demographic variables were associated with treatment at ACs. Furthermore, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine whether facility type was associated with overall survival (OS) outcomes. Data on 139,304 patients (74% male, 84% White) were retrieved. Patients were stratified by facility type, with 50,349 patients (36%) treated at ACs and 88,955 patients (64%) treated at non-ACs. Patients treated at ACs were more likely to have private insurance (41% vs 34%, p < 0.001) and less likely to have Medicare (46% vs 57%, p < 0.001). Patients treated at ACs were more likely to have larger tumors (36.91 mm vs 33.57 mm, p < 0.001) and more likely to undergo surgery (47% vs 34%, p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients treated at ACs had decreased comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index rating 0: 74% vs 69%) and similar income levels (income ≥ $46,000: 44% vs 43%). With respect to survival outcomes, patients treated at ACs demonstrated a higher median OS at 10 years than patients treated at non-ACs (65.2% vs 54.1%). The association of improved OS in patients treated at ACs continued to be true when adjusting for all other clinical and demographic variables (HR 0.900, 95% CI 0.882-0.918; p < 0.001). The results of this study indicate that facility type is associated with disparate survival outcomes in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas. Namely, patients treated at non-ACs appear to have a survival disadvantage even when controlling for additional comorbidities.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Outcomes in Older Adult Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer

The association of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with survival in the general population of patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains controversial. As such, the role of this treatment in the treatment of older adult patients (aged ≥70 years) needs to be evaluated. To describe the patterns of use of AC and compare survival outcomes of AC and observation in older adult patients following resection of BTC. This retrospective cohort study included 8091 older adult patients with resected BTC with data available in the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2019. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: AC and observation. The AC cohort was subdivided into single-agent and multiagent AC treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy vs observation following BTC resection. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) of patients who received AC compared with observation following resection of BTC as evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity score matching were performed to address indication bias. Between 2004 and 2019, of 8091 older adult patients with resected BTC identified (median [range] age, 77 [70-90] years; 5136 women [63.5%]; 2955 men [36.5%]), only one-third (2632 [32.5%]) received AC. There was an increase in the use of AC across the study period from 20.7% (n = 495) in 2004 to 2009 to 41.2% (n = 856) in 2016 to 2019. Age 80 years or older (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25-0.33; P < .001) and gallbladder primary site (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; P < .001) were associated with a lower odds of AC. Following inverse probability of treatment weighting, as a composite, AC was not associated with improved survival (median OS, 20.5 months; 95% CI, 19.2-21.7 months) compared with observation (median OS, 19.0 months; 95% CI, 18.1-20.3 months). A longer median OS was associated with single-agent AC (21.5 months; 95% CI, 19.9-24.0 months) but not multiagent AC (19.1 months; 95% CI, 17.5-21.1 months) compared with observation (median OS, 17.3 months; 95% CI, 16.1-18.4 months). This improvement in OS with single-agent AC was not apparent on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.05; P = .44). However, age at diagnosis of 80 years or older (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28-1.42; P < .001) and treatment at nonacademic centers (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20, P < .001) were associated with worse OS. In this cohort study of older adult patients, AC was not associated with an improvement in survival compared with observation following BTC resection. These findings suggest the need for further study of AC for older adult patients who may benefit after curative intent surgery for BTC.

Academic and Demographic Characteristics of Pediatric Orthopaedic Division Chiefs in the United States.

Division Chiefs (DCs) and department leadership play an integral role within the service. The goal of this study is to assess the demographics and scholarly work of the leadership in pediatric orthopaedics services across the United States and comment on the role of diversity within leadership positions. Academic medical centers and pediatric hospitals were identified using the Electronic Residency Application Service website, the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America website, and the Children's Hospital Association website. Leadership was identified using the hospitals' respective websites where data such as sex, race/ethnicity, fellowship institution, time since graduating fellowship, and academic rank were collected. Scopus database was used to determine h-indices and PubMed was used to determine the number of publications. Of 196 academic centers and 223 pediatric hospitals identified, 98 had a designated DC of the pediatric orthopaedics division. The majority of the DCs were male (85.7%), and leadership positions at hospitals with academic affiliations had a higher proportion of female DCs than nonacademic centers ( P =0.0317). DCs were mostly white (83.7%), followed by Asian (12.2%), and African American (2.0%). The average time since fellowship was 21.1 years and the average h-index was 15.7. The average age of the DCs was 56.8 years old. Of those in academic settings, 48.5% held the rank of professor. The fellowship programs that trained the most DCs were Boston Children's Hospital (16.3%) and Texas Scottish Rite for Children (14.3%). There is a paucity of available research on leadership characteristics in pediatric orthopaedic surgery. While progress has been made, there is still a lack of diversity that exists among leadership in pediatric orthopaedics, both within the academic setting as well as the private sector. The position of DC is held predominately by white males with a rank of either professor or no academic association. Intentional efforts are needed to continue to increase diversity in leadership positions within pediatric orthopaedic programs in the United States. IV.

Associations between Hospital Setting and Outcomes after Pediatric Appendectomy.

Prior studies of associations between hospital location and outcomes for pediatric appendectomy have not adjusted for significant differences in patient and treatment patterns between settings. This was a cross-sectional analysis of pediatric appendectomies in the 2016 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). Weighted multiple linear and logistic regression models compared hospital location (urban or rural) and academic status against total admission cost (TAC), length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. Patients were stratified by laparoscopic (LA) or open (OA) appendectomy. Among 54,836 patients, 39,454 (73%) were performed at an urban academic center, 11,642 (21%) were performed at an urban non-academic center, and 3740 (7%) were performed at a rural center. LA was utilized for 49,011 (89%) of all 54,386 patients: 36,049 (91%) of 39,454 patients at urban academic hospitals, 10,191 (87%) of 11,642 patients at urban non-academic centers, and 2771 (74%) of 3740 patients at rural centers (p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, urban academic centers were associated with an 18% decreased TAC (95% CI -0.193--0.165; p < 0.001) despite an 11% increased LOS (95% CI 0.087-0.134; p < 0.001) compared to rural centers. Urban academic centers were associated with a decreased odds of complication among patients who underwent LA (OR 0.787, 95% CI 0.650-0.952) but not after OA. After adjusting for relevant patient and disease-related factors, urban academic centers were associated with lower costs despite longer lengths of stay compared to rural centers. Urban academic centers utilized LA more frequently and were associated with decreased odds of postoperative complications after LA.

Laparoscopic surgery for adrenocortical carcinoma: Estimating the risk of margin-positive resection.

Over recent years, there has been increasing adoption of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). However, MIS has been associated with noncurative resection and locoregional recurrence. We aimed to identify risk factors for margin-positivity among patients who undergo MIS resection for ACC. We hypothesized that a simple nomogram can accurately identify patients most suitable for curative MIS resection. Curative-intent resections for ACC were identified through the National Cancer Database spanning 2010-2018. Trends in MIS utilization were reported using Pearson correlation coefficients. Factors associated with margin-positive resection were identified among preoperatively available variables using multivariable logistic regression, then incorporated into a predictive model. Model quality was cross validated using an 80% training data set and 20% test data set. Among 1260 ACC cases, 38.6% (486) underwent MIS resection. MIS utilization increased over time at nonacademic centers (R = 0.818, p = 0.007), but not at academic centers (R = 0.009, p = 0.982). Factors associated with margin-positive MIS resection were increasing age, nonacademic center (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, p = 0.006), cT3 (OR: 4.7, p < 0.001) or cT4 tumors (OR: 14.6, p < 0.001), and right-sided tumors (OR: 2.0, p = 0.006). A predictive model incorporating these four factors produced favorable c-statistics of 0.75 in the training data set and 0.72 in the test data set. A pragmatic nomogram was created to enable bedside risk stratification. An increasing proportion of ACC are resected via minimally invasive operations, particularly at nonacademic centers. Patient selection based on a few key factors can minimize the risk of noncurative surgery.

Impact of Facility Type on Survival in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: A Propensity Score Matched, National Cancer Database Analysis

Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is an MDS/MPN overlap syndrome with a heterogenous clinical presentation and limited therapeutic options. Given its rarity, we hypothesize that there may be disparate outcomes based on the type of treatment facility (academic versus community) similar to what has been observed in other myeloid malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia (VR Bhatt AJH 2017). To that end, we performed an analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess the impact of academic status of the facility on overall survival (OS) in patients with CMML. Methods We identified patients in the NCDB by the ICD-O-3 code for CMML (9945); we excluded patients who did not receive treatment and those who received all or part of their treatment outside of the reporting facility. Importantly, baseline clinical characteristics, laboratory/mutational data, and treatment details are generally not available in the NCDB. Academic centers were defined as those with a peer-reviewed NCI-designated cancer center support grant or university medical school that provide postgraduate medical education in at least four program areas, as defined by the Commission on Cancer Accreditation program. The primary outcome was OS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed and after backwards selection, the following variables were used for matching: age, race, median income, urban/rural, education, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Cox proportional hazard multivariable regression was employed to identify independent predictors of survival in the PSM population. Results A total of 6290 patients were identified. Baseline characteristics based on facility type are shown in Table 1. Patients treated at an academic center were younger, with a higher prevalence of Black race and lower comorbidity burden. Academic centers also had a patient population with a significantly higher median household income, more private insurance, and higher education level as compared to non-academic centers. The median follow-up time was 14.6 months (95% CI 0.4-89.7). The median OS for the entire cohort was 59 months (95% CI 56.7-62.0) and the median survival was significantly longer in patients treated at an academic center (60.6 months [95% CI 57.5-64.8]) as compared to those treated at a non-academic center (57.3 months [95% CI 53.4-61.8]). In the PSM analysis, a cohort of 1884 patients treated at an academic center were matched to 1895 patients treated at a non-academic center. In an unadjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in median OS (p=0.3) between the academic and non-academic groups. However, in a multivariable analysis of the PSM populations that accounted for age, race, CCI, insurance, distance to center, and median income, patients treated at an academic center had a significantly improved survival as compared to those treated at a non-academic center (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.94, p = 0.005, Figure 1). Discussion We found significant differences in the characteristics of CMML patients treated at academic versus non-academic centers. After PSM and multivariable adjustment, survival was significantly improved with treatment at an academic center versus non-academic. Although limited in the depth of information about CMML prognostic features and treatments, this relatively large analysis of CMML patients suggests that management of this rare disease at an academic center may be associated with improved survival outcomes. Future prospective studies to ascertain the underlying causes for survival discrepancy in CMML at academic versus non-academic centers may help identify patients that should be triaged to an academic facility.

Using an artificial intelligence tool incorporating natural language processing to identify patients with a diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis in electronic health records

BackgroundBecause anti-neutrophil cytoplasmatic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a rare, life-threatening, auto-immune disease, conducting research is difficult but essential. A long-lasting challenge is to identify rare AAV patients within the electronic-health-record (EHR)-system to facilitate real-world research. Artificial intelligence (AI)-search tools using natural language processing (NLP) for text-mining are increasingly postulated as a solution. MethodsWe employed an AI-tool that combined text-mining with NLP-based exclusion, to accurately identify rare AAV patients within large EHR-systems (>2.000.000 records). We developed an identification method in an academic center with an established AAV-training set (n = 203) and validated the method in a non-academic center with an AAV-validation set (n = 84). To assess accuracy anonymized patient records were manually reviewed. ResultsBased on an iterative process, a text-mining search was developed on disease description, laboratory measurements, medication and specialisms. In the training center, 608 patients were identified with a sensitivity of 97.0 % (95%CI [93.7, 98.9]) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 56.9 % (95%CI [52.9, 60.1]). NLP-based exclusion resulted in 444 patients increasing PPV to 77.9 % (95%CI [73.7, 81.7]) while sensitivity remained 96.3 % (95%CI [93.8, 98.0]). In the validation center, text-mining identified 333 patients (sensitivity 97.6 % (95%CI [91.6, 99.7]), PPV 58.2 % (95%CI [52.8, 63.6])) and NLP-based exclusion resulted in 223 patients, increasing PPV to 86.1 % (95%CI [80.9, 90.4]) with 98.0 % (95%CI [94.9, 99.4]) sensitivity. Our identification method outperformed ICD-10-coding predominantly in identifying MPO+ and organ-limited AAV patients. ConclusionsOur study highlights the advantages of implementing AI, notably NLP, to accurately identify rare AAV patients within large EHR-systems and demonstrates the applicability and transportability. Therefore, this method can reduce efforts to identify AAV patients and accelerate real-world research, while avoiding bias by ICD-10-coding.