Node-negative Gastric Cancer Patients Research Articles

Neural Invasion is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Young and Lymph Node Negative Gastric Cancer Patients Underwent Curative Gastrectomy

Background The prognostic significance of neural invasion (NI) in gastric cancer (GC) has not been established. This study is to investigate the characteristic and prognostic value of NI in GC. Methods 592 patients who had undergone gastrectomy for GC were retrospectively analyzed. NI was defined when cancer cells infiltrated into the perineurium or neural fascicles by hematoxylin and eosin staining of surgical specimens. NI and the other clinical factors were analyzed. Results NI was detected in 270 of the 592 patients. NI was associated with tumor size, site, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, D dissection, tumor differentiation, Lauren classification, and blood vessel invasion. NI was associated with the overall survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that NI was not an independent prognostic factor for total patients, while NI independently predicted prognosis for age < 60 and lymph node metastasis negative patients by subgroup analysis. Concomitant existence of NI with tumor size ≥3cm, TNM stage III, or diffused Lauren classification independently predicted prognosis. Conclusions The frequency of NI is high in GC patients and increases with disease progression. NI is related to poor survival in GC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy and provides independent prognostic value for young and lymph node metastasis negative patients.

Clinicopathological and Prognostic Factors in Node-Negative Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Curative Resection

Clinicopathological and Prognostic Factors in Node-Negative Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Curative Resection

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients.

Currently, there is still controversy on postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for node-negative advanced gastric cancer. Herein, we sought to evaluate the role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological characteristics of 363 node-negative advanced gastric cancer patients in our hospital from 1996 to 2007 who underwent gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy. We compared the survival rate of the surgery-only group with that of the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment group. The 5-year survival rates of patients in the surgery-only group and the chemotherapy treatment group were 70.7% and 73.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the survival rate between patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy and patients not receiving chemotherapy (P=0.328). However, postoperative chemotherapy treatment significantly increased the survival rate of pT4aN0M0 patients (P=0.020), although it did not exert a direct effect on the survival rate in pT2N0M0 and pT3N0M0 patients (P=0.990 and P=0.895). We also summarized and analyzed the side effects and safety of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The rate of chemotherapy-related adverse events was 79.9%. Although 61 (36.1%) patients had to adjust their chemotherapy dose, no patient died from side effects. In conclusion, postoperative chemotherapy treatment is safe but did not show a direct impact on the survival rate of the node-negative advanced gastric cancer patients. However, pT4aN0M0 patients can benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after undergoing D2 radical resections.

Venous Invasion and Perineural Invasion as Upstaging and Poor Prognostic Factors in N0 Gastric Cancers.

Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients. In node-negative (N0) gastric cancer patients, additional prognostic factors are needed to reinforce TNM staging. We semi-quantitatively recorded the presence of lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion and evaluated the possibility that they could be used as upstaging factors in N0 gastric cancer by comparing N0 gastric cancer cases with N1 cases. Venous (p<0.001) and perineural (p<0.001) invasion were important factors in the relapse-free survival of N0 patients, but lymphatic invasion was not. N0 cases with venous or perineural invasion had survival curves similar to those of N1 patients. In addition, the number of invasive features (lymphatic, venous, or perineural) was an important factor in predicting poor patient survival. Venous and perineural invasion were significant prognostic factors in N0 gastric cancer cases. It is necessary to record lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion separately in the pathology report, especially in cases of N0 gastric cancer.

Determinants of Survival for Patients with Neoadjuvant-Treated Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.

This study sought to determine prognostic markers for disease recurrence and survival in a cohort of neoadjuvant-treated, node-negative gastric cancer patients (ypT0-4N0M0). Clinicopathologic data from patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative-intent gastrectomy at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1995 to 2017 were evaluated. Patients with AJCC TNM stage ypT0-4N0M0 were considered for analysis. The inclusion criteria were met by 212 patients with a mean age of 58.3 years. Of these patients, 60 % were male, 53 % were Caucasian, 87 % received chemoradiation, and 13 % received chemotherapy. The findings showed a median overall survival (OS) rate of 11.3 years, a 5-year survival rate of 72 %, and a 10-year survival rate of 57 %. During a median follow-up period of 5.5 years, 38.2 % of the patients died. In the multivariable analysis, ypT4-stage and nodal yield fewer than 16 were significantly associated with reduced OS. Cancer classified as ypT4 had more aggressive biologic traits, including lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and was treated more aggressively with total gastrectomy and additional organ resection despite frequent positive margins. Depth of invasion remained significantly associated with worse outcome after the analysis controlled for nodal yield and possible stage migration. Compared with ypT0-3 tumors, ypT4 cancers were associated with significantly more recurrences (13 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.05), and the primary modes of failure for ypT4 lesions were local recurrence and peritoneal metastases (88 % of recurrences). Depth of primary tumor invasion and nodal yield were significantly associated with OS among the patients with ypT0-4N0M0 gastric cancer. Serosal invasion (ypT4) was associated with a high rate of peritoneal recurrence, and trials of intraperitoneal therapy targeting these patients should be considered.

RECURRENCE IN PN0 GASTRIC CANCER: RISK FACTORS IN THE OCCIDENT.

ABSTRACT Background: Nearly 10% of node negative gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery have disease recurrence. Western data is extremely poor on this matter and identifying the risk factors that associate with relapse may allow new strategies to improve survival. Aim: Verify the clinical and pathological characteristics that correlate with recurrence in node negative gastric cancer. Methods: All gastric cancer patients submitted to gastrectomy between 2009 and 2019 at our institution and pathologically classified as N0 were considered. Their data were available in a prospective database. Inclusion criteria were: gastric adenocarcinoma, node negative, gastrectomy with curative intent, R0 resection. Main outcomes studied were: disease-free survival and overall survival. Results: A total of 270 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 63-year-old and 155 were males. Subtotal gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy were performed in 64% and 74.4%, respectively. Mean lymph node yield was 37.6. Early GC was present in 54.1% of the cases. Mean follow-up was 40.8 months and 19 (7%) patients relapsed. Disease-free survival and overall survival were 90.9% and 74.6%, respectively. Independent risk factors for worse disease-free survival were: total gastrectomy, lesion size ≥3.4 cm, higher pT status and <16 lymph nodes resected. Conclusion: In western gastric cancer pN0 patients submitted to gastrectomy, lymph node count <16, pT3-4 status, tumor size ≥3.4 cm, total gastrectomy and presence of lymphatic invasion, are all risk factors for disease relapse.

Impact of the number of examined lymph nodes on stage migration in node-negative gastric cancer patients: a Chinese multi-institutional analysis with propensity score matching.

BackgroundThis propensity score matching (PSM) analysis assessed the influence of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) count on stage migration and survival in node-negative (pN0) gastric cancer (GC) patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 7,620 GC patients who underwent curative gastric resection in three Chinese medical centers. PSM was used to reduce the confounding effects between the pN0 GC patients with ELNs <16 or ≥16. Survival differences among various subgroups of GC patients were analyzed to assess the impact of the ELNs count on the stage migration in accordance with the overall survival (OS) of pN0 GC patients.ResultsAfter matching, the backgrounds of pN0 GC patients in the ELNs <16 (n=825) and ELNs ≥16 (n=826) groups were well-balanced. Survival analyses revealed that the ELNs count was positively correlated with the OS (P=0.001). Multiple Cox analysis indicated that the ELNs count was an independent predictor of the OS in pN0 GC patients. Stage migrations were mainly detected in subgroups of pN0 GC patients with specific pTNM stages, as follows: (I) pT2N0M0 with ELNs <16 vs. pT3N0M0 with ELNs ≥16; (II) pT3N0M0 with ELNs <16 vs. pT3N1M0 with ELNs ≥16; and (III) pT4aN0M0 with ELNs <16 vs. pT4aN1M0 with ELNs ≥16.ConclusionsWe show that stage migration can be detected in pN0 GC patients, and that it could be gradually reduced or prevented by increasing the ELNs count.

Influence of Tumor Location on Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival for Early Gastric Cancer: a Population-Based Study

BackgroundThe question that whether the criteria for endoscopic resection of early gastric non-cardia cancer (GNCC) is appropriate for early gastric cardia cancer (GCC) remains unclear. Thus, our aim was to evaluate the influence of tumor location on lymph node metastasis (LNM) and overall survival (OS) for early gastric cancer (GC). MethodsA total of 5440 early GC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were identified. Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of tumor location on LNM and OS for early GC. ResultsThe rate of LNM was 17.48% for early GCC patients (232/1327) and 18.62% for early GNCC patients (766/4113). The early GCC patients experienced no significantly different risk of LNM compared with the early GNCC patients (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76–1.12, P = 0.405). The early GC patients were further stratified by node status. Tumor location was not a predictor of OS for node-negative early GC patients (adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96–1.21, P = 0.225) but a predictor of OS for node-positive early GC patients (adjusted HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.48–2.20, P < 0.001). ConclusionsTumor location was not a predictor of LNM for early GC patients. Moreover, tumor location was not a predictor of OS for node-negative early GC patients. Thus, the criteria for endoscopic resection of early GNCC might be appropriate for the treatment of early GCC.

Tumor Size Improves the Accuracy of the Prognostic Prediction of Lymph Node–Negative Gastric Cancer

BackgroundTumor size has been regarded as the “T” stage of many solid tumors because of its effect on prognosis. However, the prognostic impact of tumor size in gastric cancer (GC) is still controversial. Materials and methodsA total of 436 patients with curatively resected GC and those without lymph node metastasis in our center were retrospectively enrolled. The appropriate cutoff points for tumor size were determined. Potential prognostic factors were analyzed. In addition, a pathological tumor-size (pTS) classification system was proposed to evaluate the superiority of its prognostic prediction of node-negative GC patients compared with that of the pT staging system. ResultsThe ideal cutoff points for tumor size were 4 and 8 cm. In the multivariate analysis, tumor size was identified as an independent prognostic factor for node-negative GC patients after surgery, as was pT stage. The pTS classification was found to be more appropriate for predicting the overall survival of node-negative GC patients after curative surgery than pT stage, and the −2 log-likelihood of the pTS classification (1680.782) was smaller than the value of pT (1695.239). ConclusionsAs an independent prognostic factor, tumor size should be incorporated into the pT staging system to enhance the accuracy of the prognostic prediction of node-negative GC patients.

Prognostic Value of the Number of Lymph Nodes Examined in Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer

BackgroundOur aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of the number of lymph nodes examined (eLNs) in patients with node-negative gastric cancer (GC) and further to adjust the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system based on the number of eLNs. MethodsNode-negative GC patients diagnosed during 1988–2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included. On the basis of a primary cohort of 4159 node-negative GC patients, we built the adjusted AJCC 8th staging system, which was then internally validated by a bootstrap method, and externally validated with an independent cohort of 5565 node-negative GC patients. ResultsThe median number of eLNs was 10. For the training set, the optimal eLNs thresholds were determined to be 9 for node-negative GC patients. The adjusted AJCC 8th staging system for node-negative GC patients based on the number of eLNs had a significantly higher Harrell’s concordance index than the initial AJCC 8th staging system (C-index, 0.635 versus 0.616; P < 0.001). Thus, the adjusted AJCC 8th staging system had superior prognostic stratification. Similar results were found in the validation set. ConclusionsFor node-negative GC patients in the United States, the adjusted AJCC 8th staging system based on the number of eLNs predicted survival more accurately and discriminatively.

Clinicopathologic factors associated with recurrence and long-term survival in node-negative advanced gastric cancer patients.

despite a better prognosis in node-negative advanced gastric cancer (GC), a proportion of patients have a tumor recurrence within five years and eventually die due to cancer-related causes. The present study aimed to evaluate the predictive factors of tumor recurrence and long-term survival in node-negative advanced GC. a total of 646 node-negative advanced GC patients who underwent a curative gastrectomy in our institution were included in the study. The impact of different clinicopathologic factors on tumor recurrence and overall survival were analyzed. tumor recurrences were observed in 181 patients and the cumulative recurrence rate at two-years and five-years were 50.8% and 86.2%, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion, advanced T stage (T3-T4) and an inadequate number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) were independent predictive factors of tumor recurrence in node-negative advanced GC. Older age, an upper 1/3 tumor, lymphovascular invasion, infiltration growth pattern (INFγ) and the depth of tumor invasion (T4 stage) were independently associated with long-term survival. With regard to node-negative patients with ≥ 15 retrieved LNs, infiltration growth pattern (INFγ) and advanced T stage (T3-T4) were independent risk factors for both tumor recurrence and long-term survival. in addition to lymphovascular invasion, inadequate RLNs and advanced T stage, the prognostic significance of infiltration growth pattern in node-negative advanced GC was especially emphasized. These risk factors should be considered when selecting candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative surveillance.

Recurrence in node-negative advanced gastric cancer: Novel findings from an in-depth pathological analysis of prognostic factors from a multicentric series.

AIMTo analyze the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with both node-negative gastric carcinoma and diagnosis of recurrence during follow-up.METHODSWe enrolled 41 patients treated with curative gastrectomy for pT2-4aN0 gastric carcinoma between 1992 and 2010, who developed recurrence (Group 1). We retrospectively selected this group from the prospectively collected database of 4 centers belonging to the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer, and compared them with 437 pT2-4aN0 patients without recurrence (Group 2). We analyzed lymphatic embolization, microvascular infiltration, perineural infiltration, and immunohistochemical determination of p53, Ki67, and HER2 in Group 1 and in a subgroup of Group 2 (Group 2bis) of 41 cases matched with Group 1 according to demographic and pathological characteristics.RESULTST4a stage and diffuse histotype were associated with recurrence in the group of pN0 patients. In-depth pathological analysis of two homogenous groups of pN0 patients, with and without recurrence during long-term follow-up (groups 1 and 2bis), revealed two striking patterns: lymphatic embolization and perineural infiltration (two parameters that pathologists can easily report), and p53 and Ki67, represent significant factors for recurrence.CONCLUSIONThe reported pathological features should be considered predictive factors for recurrence and could be useful to stratify node-negative gastric cancer patients for adjuvant treatment and tailored follow-up.

The retrieval of at least 25 lymph nodes should be essential for advanced gastric cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: A retrospective analysis of single-institution database study design: Cohort study

BackgroundRecently, increased evidence have shown that the better prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients was associated with the larger number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs), but the optimal number of RLNs remains controversial. In the present study, we investigated whether adequate LN retrieval (≥15) was necessary to evaluate the prognosis of patients and attempted to propose an appropriate cutoff-point for the number of RLNs. MethodsWe reviewed 2246 GC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy in our research institution between January 1986 and January 2008. All patients were divided into several groups based on the number of RLNs. The prognostic outcomes of different patient groups were compared and clinicopathologic features were analyzed. ResultsIn the present study, our results indicated that ≥15 RLNs showed a better survival outcome than inadequate LN retrieval (<15), regardless of the node-negative or node-positive GC patients (P < 0.001). For the more advanced GC patients (T2-T4 stage, N1-N3 stage, and stage II-stage III), the retrieval of 25–29 LNs could provide a better survival benefit compared with <25 or ≥30 RLNs (P < 0.05). In addition, for the patients who underwent proximal or total gastrectomy, the superior prognosis was still observed in the patient group with 25–29 RLNs. ConclusionThe minimal goal of 15 RLNs may not be enough to accurately evaluate prognosis of all patients and at least 25 RLNs should be necessary for advanced GC patients with lymph node metastasis.

Prognostic significance of the total number of harvested lymph nodes for lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients

BackgroundThe relationship between the number of harvested lymph nodes (HLNs) and prognosis of gastric cancer patients without an involvement of lymph nodes has not been well-evaluated. The objective of this study is to further explore this issue.MethodsWe collected data from 399 gastric cancer patients between November 2006 and October 2011. All of them were without metastatic lymph nodes.ResultsSurvival analyses showed that statistically significant differences existed in the survival outcomes between the two groups allocated by the total number of HLNs ranging from 16 to 22. Therefore, we adopted 22 as the cut-off value of the total number of HLNs for grouping (group A: HLNs <22; group B: HLNs≥22). The intraoperative and postoperative characteristics, including operative blood loss (P=0.096), operation time (P=0.430), postoperative hospital stay (P=0.142), complications (P=0.552), rate of reoperation (P=0.966) and postoperative mortality (P=1.000), were comparable between the two groups. T-stage-stratified Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed that the 5-year survival rate of patients at the T4 stage was better in group B than in group A (76.9% vs. 58.5%; P=0.004). An analysis of multiple factors elucidated that the total number of HLNs, T stage, operation time and age were independently correlated factors of prognosis.ConclusionsRegarding gastric cancer patients without the involvement of lymph nodes, an HLN number ≥22 would be helpful in prolonging their overall survival, especially for those at T4 stage. The total number of HLNs was an independent prognostic factor for this population of patients.

Prognostic Factors for Survival in Node-Negative Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Curative Resection.

Lymph node involvement is the strongest prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer; patients with node-negative gastric cancer present with better survival. However, some patients develop recurrent gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to review the clinicopathological characteristics and factors for prognosis in patients with node-negative gastric cancer who underwent curative resection. Between January 2004 and December 2015, the clinicopathological characteristics of 302 patients with node-negative gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates for patients with node-negative gastric cancer were 80.0%, 69.0%, and 63.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that tumor size, histologic type, and depth of invasion had significant effects on survival (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size (hazard ratio: 1.83%, 95.0% confidence interval: 1.13-2.96, p = 0.014), histologic type (hazard ratio: 1.57%, 95.0% confidence interval: 1.01-2.44, p = 0.042), and depth of invasion (hazard ratio: 1.38%, 95.0% confidence interval: 1.14-1.67, p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Tumor size, histologic type, and depth of invasion are important prognostic factors in patients with node-negative gastric cancer. These parameters should be considered to stratify patients for therapy and follow-up strategies.

Increasing the Number of Examined Lymph Nodes is a Prerequisite for Improvement in the Accurate Evaluation of Overall Survival of Node-Negative Gastric Cancer Patients.

This study aims to elucidate whether increasing the number of examined lymph nodes (NELN) is mandatory for the accurate prognosis of node-negative gastric cancer (GC) patients after curative gastrectomy in Eastern countries (China and Japan). The clinicopathological data of 2455 GC patients (including 1137 node-negative cases) were included to demonstrate whether a minimum NELN is inevitable for guaranteeing the accurate prognosis of node-negative GC patients after curative gastrectomy. Survival analyses revealed that the NELN significantly positively correlated with overall survival (p<0.001) and was an independent prognostic predictor (hazard ratio 0.447; p=0.025) of 1137 node-negative GC patients. Stratum analysis within the Kaplan-Meier method showed that sex, tumor size, and extent of lymphadenectomy did not affect the NELN in predicting the prognosis of all node-negative GC patients. Stage migration was mainly detected in the subgroup of node-negative GC Chinese patients who presented considerably lower mean NELN and more advanced staging than patients from Japan. The NELN was identified as the most intensively independent predictor of prognosis of 600 node-negative GC patients from China, with the smallest Akaike information criterion (176.964) and Bayesian information criterion values (194.552). These findings indicate that increasing the NELN is a prerequisite to guaranteeing precise TNM classification. The NELN should be considered a mandatory requirement for improving the accuracy of prognostic evaluation of GC patients, especially for advanced-stage patients.

A new predictive model combined of tumor size, lymph nodes count and lymphovascular invasion for survival prognosis in patients with lymph node-negative gastric cancer.

BackgroundVarious factors may affect the clinical prognosis of lymph node-negative gastric cancer (GC) patients. This study aimed to provide evaluable prognostic information of combination of tumor size (Ts), lymph nodes count (LNs) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in lymph node-negative GC patients.MethodsA total of 1,019 node-negative GC patients were enrolled in this retrospective study from 2000 to 2010. The cutoff points of Ts and LNs were determined using X-tile and patients were randomly categorized into training and validation sets by the sample size ratio 1:1. The clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed and survival prognostic factors were identified, whereas the survival prediction accuracy was also compared by C-index during the different independent prognostic factors.ResultsThe cutoff points for Ts were 3cm and 5cm, while 14 was the cutoff point for LNs. Age, T stage, Ts, LNs and LVI were identified as independent prognostic factors in node-negative GC patients, and a new prognostic predictive model, TsNL staging system which was composed of Ts, LNs and LVI, was proposed in this study. Compared with T staging system, significant improvement of predictive accuracy for TsNL system was found. Furthermore, nomogram based on TsNL was more accurate in prognostic prediction than that based on Ts, LNs and LVI, separately.ConclusionsAge, T stage, Ts, LNs and LVI were independent prognostic factors in lymph node-negative GC patients. The TsNL staging system, composed of Ts, LNs and LVI, which was closely associated with clinicopathologic features, may improve the prognostic prediction accuracy in node-negative GC patients.

Prognostic Impact of the Signet Ring Cell Type in Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.

Little is known regarding the prognostic impact of the signet ring cell (SRC) histotype on negative lymph nodes (LNs) in gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences between SRC and non-SRC GC patients without LN metastasis. The medical records of patients with GC who underwent gastrectomy at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Centre from 1996 to 2012 were reviewed to analyse the clinicopathologic characteristics associated with survival. A total of 480 cases of GC patients without LN metastasis were identified, which included 90 SRC GC patients and 390 non-SRC GC patients. Between the two groups, there were a host of significant differences in the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition (AJCC) stage. We found that SRC histology was correlated with a poor prognosis in terms of recurrence in node-negative GC patients and that SRC histologic analysis combined with AJCC staging maybe an effectual method for prediction of the recurrence rate. Additionally, we found that SRC GC presents a more dismal overall prognosis in patients with perineural or vascular invasion.

Survival benefit of greater number of lymph nodes dissection for advanced node-negative gastric cancer patients following radical gastrectomy.

A common clinicopathological factor except for T stage that could significantly influence the clinical outcome of advanced node-negative gastric cancer patients following radical gastrectomy was unknown. This study was designed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of these patients, and to evaluate the outcome indicators and improve the risk stratification. A total of 195 patients harboring advanced gastric adenocarcinoma with no lymph node and distant metastases and following radical gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed from the prospectively collected database of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University between 2006 and 2010. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates of this study population were 85.0 and 69.6%. Factors influencing the overall survival were the degree of tumor differentiation, the depth of invasion and the number of lymph nodes resected (LN, cutoff = 18). Lymph node was recognized as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival of advanced node-negative gastric cancer patients, and the prognosis of the patients with greater number of lymph nodes resected (LN ≥ 18) was significantly better than those with lymph node < 18, and only the patients with T3/T4 stage could be significantly stratified by lymph node. Based on this condition, a new staging system named tumor-node-metastasis staging system for T3/T4 node-negative gastric cancer was constructed, which could have statistically different overall survival between subgroups. Lymph node was an independent prognostic factor of patients with advanced node-negative gastric cancer, and retrieval of more than 18 lymph nodes should be warranted. In addition, these patients with lesser number of lymph nodes resected might need aggressive postoperative treatment and closer follow-up.

Survival after Gastrectomy in Node-Negative Gastric Cancer: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors.

BackgroundLymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors for survival of patients with gastric cancer (GC) after surgical resection. Nevertheless, a considerable number of patients have node-negative disease. We performed the present systematic review to evaluate survival and identify prognostic factors in node-negative GC patients undergoing curative intent resection.Material/MethodsRelevant studies published between January 2000 and January 2015 were identified by searching the PubMed database and reviewed systematically. Summary relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using random-effects models.ResultsThirty observational studies involving 12 504 patients were included in the review. Median 5-year overall survival was 84.3% (range, 53–96.3%). Pooled analysis showed that old age (RR, 1.26; 95%CI, 1.13–1.42), <D2 lymph node dissection (1.28; 1.05–1.55), larger tumor (1.18; 1.10–1.26), serosal invasion (2.03; 1.68–2.44), lymphatic invasion (1.25; 1.00–1.57), vascular invasion (1.67; 1.19–2.34), and lymphovascular invasion (1.93; 1.20–3.10) were significant association with decreased survival.ConclusionsSurgical resection offers good overall survival for patients with node-negative GC. Tumor-related factors seem to have most prognostic significance.