Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Procedures Research Articles

Breast Modular Resection (BMR) in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) With Intraoperative Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) Monitoring Improved Surgical Training Outcome Among Fellows

BackgroundNipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are challenging for surgical training among fellow trainees. We developed a surgical training course with novel concept of breast modular resection (BMR) for NSM/SSM procedure, and performed this study to investigate whether BMR could improve surgical outcomes compared to classical procedure resection (CPR). MethodsThe records of 105 breast cancer patients undergoing NSM/SSM with immediate reconstruction performed by fellow trainees were reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between 2 groups. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) was performed to intraoperatively evaluate the blood supply of the NAC, and the absolute perfusion unit (PU) values and relative perfusion unit (rPU) values were further compared. ResultsSurgical training outcomes of BMR group (N = 52) were insignificantly improved compared to CPR group (N = 53). The rates of NAC necrosis, flap necrosis and implant removal all reduced respectively. Among the 60 NSM patients, the blood loss (P = .011) and surgery time (P < .001) was significantly reduced in BMR group (N = 30) and all the other outcomes were insignificantly improved. Both the absolute PU values and rPU values were significantly higher among patients without NAC necrosis (P < .001). The absolute PU values were significantly higher in BMR group (P = .002). ConclusionCompared to CPR, the BMR-based surgical training course for NSM demonstrated the reduction in complications and operating time, offering a potential streamlined, efficient, and safe method for NSM procedure. LSCI was effective for intraoperative visualized evaluation of NAC blood supply and could provide effective real-time feedback for fellow trainees.

Factors associated with alteration of nipple or skin sensation and impact of duration of time following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM): an analysis of 460 cases with comparison of conventional versus endoscopic- or robotic-assisted NSM

BackgroundThe current study aims to evaluate the nipple and skin sensation following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and identify patient-, surgical-, or treatment-related factors affecting nipple or skin sensation in this cohort.MethodsPatients who received NSM with postoperative nipple and skin sensation test evaluation at a single institution over the past 10 years were retrospectively retrieved from a prospectively collected breast cancer surgery database.ResultsA total of 460 NSM procedures were included in this current study, with the mean age of 48.3 ± 9.1. Three-hundred eighty-three (83.3%) patients had breast reconstructions. One-hundred seventy-four (37.8%) received conventional NSM (C-NSM), 195 (42.4%) endoscopic-assisted NSM (E-NSM), and 91 (19.8%) robotic-assisted NSM (R-NSM) procedures. For nipple sensation assessment, 15 (3.3%) were grade 0, 83 (18.2%) grade I, 229 (49.7%) grade II, and 133 (28.9%) grade III (normal sensation), respectively, with mean grade score of 2.1 ± 0.7. The preserved (grade III) nipple sensation rate was 36.2% (63/174) in the C-NSM group, 26.7% (52/195) in the E-NSM group, and 19.7% (18/91) in the R-NSM group (P = 0.06). The “time since surgery to last evaluation” was significantly longer in the C-NSM group (45.6 ± 34 months) or E-NSM group (44.7 ± 35.8 months) as compared to R-NSM group (31.8 ± 16 months, P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, peri-areolar incision showed higher grade of nipple sensation (OR: 2.1, P = 0.02) compared to upper outer quadrant incision, and longer follow-up time post-NSM showed significant improvement of nipple or skin sensation (> 60 months vs. ≦ 12 months: nipple odds ratio (OR) = 5.75, P < 0.01; skin, OR = 1.97, P < 0.05).ConclusionOur current analysis showed some factors to be related to postoperative nipple or skin sensation, and longer “time after surgery” was associated with significant improvement of nipple and skin sensation in patients who received NSM, regardless of the surgical approaches.SynopsisOur current analysis showed a significant portion of patients with decrease or loss of nipple or skin sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). Several factors associated with preserved nipple or skin sensation were identified, including age, surgical methods, surgical wound location, and association of time from surgery showing that improvement of partial nipple or skin sensation was evident after a longer follow-up.

Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) or skin flap ischemia necrosis post nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM)—analysis of clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to identify clinicopathologic factors and/or preoperative MRI vascular patterns in the prediction of ischemia necrosis of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) or skin flap post nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 441 NSM procedures from January 2011 to September 2021 from the breast cancer database at our institution. The ischemia necrosis of NAC or skin flap was evaluated in correlation with clinicopathologic factors and types of skin incision. Patients who received NSM with preoperative MRI evaluation were further evaluated for the relationship between vascular pattern and the impact on ischemia necrosis of NAC or skin flap.ResultsA total of 441 cases with NSM were enrolled in the current study, and the mean age of the cases was 49.1 ± 9.8 years old. A total of 41 (9.3%) NSM procedures were found to have NAC ischemia/necrosis. Risk factors were evaluated of which old age, large mastectomy specimen weight (> 450 g), and peri-areola incision were identified as predictors of NAC necrosis. Two-hundred seventy NSM procedures also received preoperative MRI, and the blood supply pattern was 18% single-vessel type and 82% double-vessel pattern. There were no correlations between MRI blood supply patterns or types of skin flap incisions with ischemia necrosis of NAC. There were also no correlations between blood loss and the pattern or size of the blood vessel.ConclusionFactors such as the type of skin incision, age, and size of mastectomy weight played an important role in determining ischemia necrosis of NAC; however, MRI vascular (single or dual vessel supply) pattern was not a significant predictive factor.

Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-based Reconstruction for Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

The presence of an extensive intraductal component is associated to an increasing risk of relapse in the nipple-areola complex. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction using silicone implants. We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative complications and oncological safety of 67 breast cancer patients diagnosed with pure DCIS who underwent NSM with immediate breast reconstruction using silicone implants between 2004 and 2018. Among the 127 NSM procedures performed, 2 hematomas (1.5%) and 1 partial nipple necrosis (0.7%) were observed. After a mean follow-up of 60 months, the local recurrence rate was of 8.9%, the disease-free survival rate was of 90%, and 1 of the patients died. Despite the local recurrence rate, we showed that NSM with immediate breast reconstruction using silicone implants is a feasible surgical approach, with a low rate of complications and high survival rates for patients with a diagnosis of pure DCIS when breast-conserving surgery is not an option.

Tumor-to-Nipple Distance in Selecting Patients for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.

Introduction:Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a valid option for carefully selected cases. Oncologic guidelines have not been established, but proximity of the tumor to the nipple, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been suggested as contraindications to nipple preservation. This study describes our experience with NSM in relation to these factors, in particular distance of tumor from the nipple, to help establish evidence-based guidelines for NSM.Method:All NSM procedures performed at our institution between 2014 and 2018 were reviewed. The tumor-to-nipple distance was measured for each patient using mammography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients underwent a frozen section (FS) biopsy of the base of the nipple during surgery, and if cancer was detected, the procedure was converted to a skin-sparing mastectomy. Patients were followed for postoperative complications and cancer recurrence.Results:Sixty-eight patients (98 breasts) underwent NSM with immediate reconstruction. Fifty-three patients (78%) underwent the procedure for breast cancer. Nipple involvement was detected on FS in 1 patient and on permanent pathology after a negative FS in 1 patient. Forty-three percent of our patients had a tumor-to-nipple distance of ≤2 cm. During a mean follow-up of 32.5 months (±19.4 months), no locoregional recurrences were observed; however, distant metastasis occurred in 3 patients.Conclusions:When histologic examination from the base of the nipple is negative (either by FS or permanent pathology), NSM can be considered oncologically safe. Lack of nipple involvement by preoperative clinical and imaging assessment and intraoperative FS is sufficient to classify patients as suitable for NSM.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction - early complications and outcomes of the treatment.

Aim of the studyTo assess the early complications and outcomes of the treatment of patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction.Material and methodsA retrospective study was performed on 120 patients who underwent 130 NSM (10 bilateral) procedures between 1.01.2015 and 31.12.2017 in two oncology centers in Poland. In 80 patients a breast cancer was recognized. Sixteen patients underwent operations on the basis of being carriers of the BRCA1 mutation. The follow-up period ranged from 10 to 34 months. The NSM procedures were performed with or without skin reduction and a free nipple-areola complex (NAC) transplant, with 130 prosthetic devices inserted subpectorally. Breast cancer patients followed the standard protocol for adjuvant therapy.ResultsThe patients for risk-reducing mastectomies were younger. Prevalent histology was no special type (NST) in 60 out of 80 patients, mean tumor – NAC distance was 43.3 mm. The prevalent biological subtype was Luminal B HER2-negative. Adjuvant management consisted of chemotherapy in 61 and radiotherapy in 35 patients. We noted 14 cases of complications, 13 in the cancer group, and 1 in the non-cancer group. Skin necrosis was the most common. The mean time for the appearance of the complications was 2.8 months. No local recurrences were observed.ConclusionsNSM is a safe and effective surgical option for qualified patients with breast cancer and in risk-reducing mastectomies.

Breast Cancer Recurrence in the Nipple-Areola Complex After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer

The main concern associated with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is the risk of local breast cancer recurrence at the retained nipple-areola complex (NAC) consequent to occult nipple involvement. Long-term follow-up data regarding the oncologic safety of modern therapeutic NSM in terms of cancer recurrence at the NAC and survival are limited. To assess the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and long-term outcomes associated with cancer recurrence at the NAC in a large series of patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent NSM and immediate breast reconstruction. In this retrospective cohort study at a single institution (Asan Medical Center) in Seoul, Republic of Korea, 962 breasts from 944 patients who underwent NSM and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer were analyzed between March 3, 2003, and December 31, 2015. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant systemic therapy or palliative surgery were excluded. Data analysis was performed from June 4, 2018, to August 31, 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the association between clinicopathologic variables and cancer recurrence at the NAC. To evaluate the association between cancer recurrence at the NAC and prognosis, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Among the 944 study patients (median age at diagnosis, 43 years [range, 23-67 years]) during a median follow-up of 85 months (range, 14-185 months), 39 cases (4.1%) of cancer recurrence at the NAC were identified as the first event after NSM. The 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer recurrence at the NAC was 3.5% (n = 34). In multivariate analyses, multifocality or multicentricity (hazard ratio [HR], 3.309; 95% CI, 1.501-7.294; P = .003), negative hormone receptor or ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive subtype (HR, 3.051; 95% CI, 1.194-7.796; P = .02), high histologic grade (HR, 2.641; 95% CI, 1.132-6.160; P = .03), and extensive intraductal component (HR, 3.338; 95% CI, 1.262-8.824; P = .02) were independently associated with cancer recurrence at the NAC after NSM. All 39 recurrent cases involved wide local excision. Patients with and without cancer recurrence at the NAC as the first event did not differ significantly with regard to distant metastasis-free survival (P = .95) or overall survival (P = .21). The 10-year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 89.3% among patients with cancer recurrence at the NAC and 94.3% among patients without recurrence. The 10-year overall survival rates were 100% among patients with cancer recurrence at the NAC and 94.5% among those without recurrence. Patients had a low incidence of cancer recurrence at the NAC after NSM and immediate breast reconstruction in this study. The findings suggest that multifocal or multicentric disease, hormone receptor-negative/ERBB2-positive subtype, high histologic grade, and positive extensive intraductal component should be considered before determining the NSM procedure.

A Systematic Review of Utility Score Assessments in the Breast Surgery Cost-Analysis Literature.

Surgery for breast cancer can have significant impact on patient quality-of-life. Cost-utility analysis provides a way to analyze the economic impact of a surgical procedure with the change in a patient's quality of life. Utility scores are used in these analyses to quantify the impact on quality of life. We undertook a systematic review of the literature on breast cancer surgical procedures to compile a repository of utility scores and to assess gaps in the current literature. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed for studies reporting utility scores for breast surgery and breast reconstruction. The health states and utility scores were extracted and grouped into seven procedural categories based on oncologic and reconstructive methods. Mean utility score and ranges were calculated and reported for each procedural category. Nineteen articles met the inclusion criteria assessing 118 health states. Most utility scores were obtained from healthcare professionals. Breast-conserving therapy yielded the highest mean utility score at 0.79, whereas mastectomy yielded a mean utility score of 0.75. Among reconstruction health states, implant reconstruction had a lower score than autologous reconstruction (0.64 implant vs. latissimus dorsi 0.69 and TRAM/DIEP 0.71). No utility scores were found associated with oncoplasty or nipple-sparing mastectomy procedures. A reliable body of utility scores is important in enabling future cost-utility and value-based analysis comparisons for breast surgical oncology. Additional work is needed to obtain health state assessments from the patient perspective, as well as assessment of more modern surgical and reconstructive approaches.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy with periareolar incision and two-stage reconstruction: Initial analysis of 31 cases.

Surgical treatment of breast cancer has changed considerably over the past four decades, culminating in the substitution of conservative approaches for Halsted's paradigm from 1894. In parallel, many breast reconstruction techniques have been proposed for patients requiring mastectomy with loss of the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Myocutaneous flaps were once the most common form of reconstruction, but recently the use of implants and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) in one or two stages has gained popularity. In this descriptive and cross-sectional study, we evaluated a sample of 31 NSM procedures with periareolar incision and two-stage reconstruction (tissue expander followed by implant) conducted between 2013 and 2017, with emphasis on the rate of complications after at least 3months of follow-up, local disease control and cosmesis measured on the Harvard scale. Five complications (16%) were observed, all of which related to the first stage: seroma (n=1; 3.2%), treated with needle aspiration, NAC necrosis (n=3; 9.6%), one case of which required debridement, and dehiscence (n=1; 3.2%), treated with resuture. Cosmesis was classified as excellent by the surgeon in 96.8% (n=27). At the time of writing, no local recurrence had been observed. In conclusion, NSM with periareolar incision and two-stage reconstruction was found to be technically feasible and associated with few complications and satisfactory esthetic outcomes.

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Primary Implant Reconstruction: Surgical and Oncological Outcome of 435 Breast Cancer Patients

Background: This study aimed to examine the incidence of surgical complications associated with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with primary implant reconstruction, analyze risk factors for early and late surgical complications of NSM, and determine the incidence of local recurrences and the safety of sparing the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 435 patients with 441 NSM procedures over a period of 9 years (2004-2012). All surgical complications and the oncological outcome were recorded during follow-up. Results: The most common early surgical complication was skin flap ischemia/necrosis (26 patients, 5.9%). Prosthesis explantation due to complications was carried out in 11 (2.5%) cases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, implant size >500 ml, diabetes mellitus, body mass index > 25 kg/m², and incisions other than lateral were risk factors for early complications (p < 0.001). The NAC excision rate was 5.4% (24 cases) due to confirmed presence of cancer cells in the subareolar tissue. Capsular contracture as a late complication occurred in 33 (7.48%) cases. Local relapse occurred in 32 (7.3%) patients. Distant metastases were diagnosed in 68 (15.6%) patients, and 53 (12.2%) patients died during the follow-up period. Conclusions: NSM with immediate implant reconstruction has an acceptable morbidity rate and is an oncologically and surgically appropriate treatment for most women requiring mastectomy.

Can Vascular Patterns on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help Predict Skin Necrosis after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?

Nipple-areola complex (NAC) and skin flap ischemia and necrosis can occur after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). The purpose of this study was to correlate vascular findings on MRI with outcomes in patients who underwent NSM. Female patients at a single institution who underwent NSM and had a preoperative breast MRI between 2010 and 2014 were identified. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical factors, and complications. Magnetic resonance images were reviewed by 2 radiologists, blinded to outcomes, for the presence of dual vs single blood supply to the breast. The association between blood supply on MRI with ischemic and necrotic complications after NSM was analyzed. One hundred and sixty-four NSM procedures were performed in 105 patients (mean age 45.5 years, range 25 to 69 years) who had a preoperative MRI. The majority of procedures were performed for malignancy (89 of 164 [54.3%]) or prophylaxis (73 of 164 [44.5%]). Nipple-areola complex or skin flap ischemia or necrosis occurred in 40 (24.4%) breasts. Ischemia or necrosis after NSM was less likely to occur in breasts with dual compared with single blood supply (20.8% vs 38.2%; p= 0.03). There was no association between surgical complications and age, BMI, smoking history, previous radiation therapy, indication for NSM, surgical specimen weight, surgical incision type, reconstruction approach, or operating surgeon on univariate analysis. Preoperative MRI characterization of breast vascularity can be considered when planning NSM. The presence of a dual blood supply to the breast on MRI is associated with a decreased risk of nipple-areola complex and skin flap ischemia and necrosis after NSM.

Abstract P2-12-18: Outpatient mastectomy with reconstruction in a freestanding surgery center using multimodality opiod-sparing perioperative analgesia including liposomal bupivacaine

Abstract HYPOTHESIS: The introduction of effective non-narcotic analgesics and the long-acting local anesthetic bupivacaine liposome (Exparel) has resulted in improved postoperative pain control and decreased reliance on opioid analgesics that often have the undesirable adverse effects of sedation, nausea, respiratory depression, and dysphoria or confusion. This has resulted in shorter postoperative care unit stays, earlier return to normal activity, and improved patient satisfaction without sacrificing appropriate pain control. Based on a positive experience with these agents in the inpatient setting, we hypothesized that mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction could be performed safely in a freestanding outpatient surgery center using a multimodality opioid-sparing analgesic regimen. METHOD: Over a 6 month period we performed unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with concurrent implant-based reconstruction on 20 patients. One patient had a unilateral mastectomy and 19 patients had bilateral mastectomy performed. Sixteen of the patients had nipple sparing mastectomy procedures. Reconstruction was performed with tissue expanders in 6 patients and as a single stage procedure with silicone gel implants in 14 patients. Acellular dermal matrix was used to support the implant in all but 1 patient. All patients were given gabapentin 600mg on the evening prior to and morning of surgery. Acetaminophen 1gm IV was given prior to induction of anesthesia in the preoperative area and again 6 hours later in the post anesthesia care unit. Ketorolac 30mg IV was given during the last half of the surgical procedure. All patients had general anesthesia with standard inhalational agents and IV fentanyl as needed. The retropectoral and serratus fascia were infiltrated with liposomal bupivacaine after surgical removal of the breast tissue, before reconstruction was started. The drain sites were also infiltrated with liposomal bupivacaine. Patients were discharged with prescriptions for gabapentin 300mg twice daily for 7 days followed by 300mg nightly for 7 days, carisoprodol 350mg every 6 hours as needed for muscle spasms, ibuprofen 800 mg every 8 hours for 5 days, hydrocodone/acetaminophen every 4 hours as needed for pain, and oral antibiotics of the surgeon's choice. RESULTS: All 20 patients completed their surgery and were discharged home after a brief stay in the postoperative care unit. No patient required readmission for pain control or any other complication in the perioperative period. No patient reported inadequate pain control. All patients were highly satisfied with their perioperative care as reported during postoperative follow-up phone calls the day after surgery and during their post-operative follow up visit. CONCLUSION: In our experience, outpatient mastectomy with reconstruction in a freestanding surgery center is safe and has a high degree of patient satisfaction when using a multimodality opioid-sparing analgesia regimen including liposomal bupivacaine. By avoiding opioid-related adverse effects, patients have a more rapid recovery, earlier return to activities of daily living, and therefore improved quality of life. Proper patient selection requires a multidisciplinary team approach for success. Citation Format: Rock DT, Jandik AL, Wittenborn WS, Fairfax K, Sandadi S. Outpatient mastectomy with reconstruction in a freestanding surgery center using multimodality opiod-sparing perioperative analgesia including liposomal bupivacaine. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-18.

Abstract P3-13-09: Improved frozen section examination of the retroareolar margin for prediction of nipple involvement in breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: Development of the nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) technique has constituted a significant advance in the surgical treatment of selected cases of breast cancer. The most important aspect of areolar complex preservation is the exclusion of carcinoma involving the nipple. The retroareolar surgical margin is usually sampled and subjected to an intraoperative evaluation by frozen section examination in order to avoid a second procedure. However, this method is not standardized resulting in variable rates of false-negative results. Here, a new technique is proposed for the intraoperative study of the retroareolar margin. This ex vivo study was conducted by performing a simulated NSM procedure for patients undergoing total mastectomy to assess the impact of these measures on the accuracy of retroareolar frozen section examination. Materials and Methods: Between September 2012 and April 2014, we studied 158 mastectomy specimens from patients undergoing total mastectomy for breast cancer at the Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo. Inclusion criteria were stage Tis-T3 tumors, multifocal and multicentric breast carcinoma, unicentric carcinoma not suitable to quadrantectomy. Patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also included. To obtain the entire sample area, the terminal retroareolar milk duct bunch was isolated. Fragments approximately 1.5 cm in length were excised and sectioned in parallel at the base of the nipple using a cold bistoury. Three transverse histological sections (4 μm each) at 200 μm intervals that included the entire isolated fragments were subjected to frozen section examination. The sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&amp;E) and were evaluated. The remainder of each fragment was embedded in paraffin and 4 μm sections were subsequently stained with H&amp;E and examined. Results: A total of 158 mastectomy specimens involving mammary carcinoma of no special type were examined. These included 15 (9.5%) in situ stage tumors, 36 (22.8%) stage I tumors, 71 (44.9%) stage II tumors, and 36 (22.8%) stage IIIA tumors. Paraffin examinations identified 25 retroareolar fragments compromised by carcinoma, resulting in 16.1% prevalence. Of the frozen sections examined, 2/158 (1.3%) had false-negative results and 5/158 (3.1%) had false-positive results. For the former two cases, the corresponding paraffin examinations detected low-grade carcinoma in situ and a residual cell cluster with a diameter less than 1 mm. The latter was found in a mastectomy specimen from a patient that underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For the three cases involving false-positive results, the corresponding paraffin examinations revealed no atypical ductal hyperplasia present, one sclerosing intraductal papilloma and one nipple syringomatous adenoma. Statistical analysis revealed that the frozen section examinations performed had a sensitivity rate of 92.0% and a specificity rate of 96.2%. In addition, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 82.1%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.4%, and the accuracy was 95.4%. Conclusion: The frozen section examination technique described here detected nipple involvement in breast cancer with greater accuracy than the frozen section usually performed by most surgeons. Citation Format: Piato JR, Aguiar FN, Mota BS, Dória MT, Alves-Jales RD, Messias AP, Goncalves R, Mano MS, Soares JM, Ricci MD, Filassi JR, Baracat EC. Improved frozen section examination of the retroareolar margin for prediction of nipple involvement in breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-09.

Importance of perforating vessels in nipple-sparing mastectomy: an anatomical description.

BackgroundNipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), understood as an oncologically valid procedure, is relatively new, and is an evolution of traditional mastectomy, particularly in relation to breast-conserving surgery. The anterior perforating branches are responsible for the cutaneous vascularization of the breast skin, and their preservation is a fundamental step to avoid possible postoperative necrosis. Therefore, evaluating the potential complications of cancer-related reconstructive surgical procedures such as NSM, both the distance of the tumoral lesion from the skin and the surgical incision site should be carefully considered. The preferred site of incision corresponds to the inframammary fold or possibly the periareolar area.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 113 patients who underwent NSM from January 2005 to October 2012 to evaluate skin complications. The anatomical study was performed by magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.ResultsOnly one of the 113 women who had undergone a NSM procedure had total necrosis (0.9%) and six patients had partial necrosis (5.8%) of the nipple-areola complex.

Nipple sparing mastectomy: does breast morphological factor related to necrotic complications?

Background:Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) can be performed for prophylactic mastectomy and the treatment of selected breast cancer with oncologic safety. The risk of skin and nipple necrosis is a frequent complication of NSM procedure, and it is usually related to surgical technique. However, the role of the breast morphology should be also investigated.Method:We prospectively performed an analysis of 124 NSM from September 2012 to January 2013 at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, focusing on necrotic complications. We analyzed the association between the risks of skin necrosis and the breast morphology of the patients.Results:Among 124 NSM in 113 patients, NSM procedures were associated with necrosis in 22 mastectomies (17.7%) among which included partial necrosis of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) in 15 of 124 NSM (12.1%) and total necrosis in 4 cases (3.5%). The NAC was removed in 5 NSM cases (4%). The volume of breast removed was the only significant factor increasing the risk of skin necrosis. The degree of ptosis was not significantly related to the necrosis risk.Conclusions:Large glandular specimen increases the risk of NAC necrosis. The degree of ptosis and the distance between the sternal notch and the NAC have no significant impact on necrotic complications in NSM. To reduce the necrotic complications in large breast after NSM, reconstruction should better be performed with autologous flap or slow skin expansion using the expander technique.

Abstract P4-14-02: National Trends and Indications for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Analysis Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

Abstract Introduction: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an evolving procedure occasionally used for breast cancer treatment. However, indications for NSM are institution-specific and lack consensus in the literature. This study uses the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the oncologic and demographic characteristics of breast cancer patients treated with NSM in the United States from 2005–2009. Methods: Female breast cancer patients treated from 2005–2009 with nipple-sparing/subcutaneous mastectomy (SEER code 30), defined as removal of breast tissue with preservation of nipple-areolar complex and overlying skin, were included. Variables analyzed included patient age, race, tumor stage, tumor size, lymph node status, and radiotherapy delivery. Results: A total of 449 female breast cancer patients who underwent NSM were isolated from the SEER database. The number of patients in the SEER database who underwent NSM increased steadily each year, from 66 in 2005 to 133 in 2009. Mean age was 52 years (s.d. 12 years). Breakdown by race showed that 369 (82%) patients were White women, 42 (9%) were Black women, 36 (8%) were of Asian descent. A majority of patients (402) were documented to have ductal or lobular carcinoma. Documented tumor diameter was less than 3 cm in 63% (284) of patients. Invasive cancer was documented in 283 (63%) patients; in situ cancer was documented in 166 (37%) patients. Lymph node involvement was negative in 374 (83%) patients. Radiation therapy was delivered to 91 (20%) patients; however, 64 patients receiving radiation therapy were node-negative. Radiation was delivered to 6% (10) of patients with in situ cancer and 27% (77) of patients with invasive cancer (p &amp;lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: The number of NSM procedures reported in SEER for breast cancer has increased from 2005–2009. However, there is a lack of consensus in the literature as to which patients may be candidates for NSM. By utilizing a national database, we are able to aggregate and report on the national experience with therapeutic NSM, to date. Patients undergoing NSM for breast cancer were characterized predominantly by tumors less than 3 cm in diameter and with negative lymph node involvement. Patients with both invasive and in situ tumors were considered suitable candidates for NSM. A majority of patients had either ductal or lobular carcinomas. A minority of patients received radiation therapy, although there was a tendency towards providing patients with invasive tumors with radiation therapy. This national data should help guide patient selection for NSM, although future studies are needed to report on the long-term oncologic safety of this procedure. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-02.

Risk of Locoregional Recurrence in Patients With False-Negative Frozen Section or Close Margins of Retroareolar Specimen in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Our purpose was to evaluate the locoregional recurrence (LRR) of patients with false-negative, frozen-section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) procedure. From 2002-2008, we recruited patients who had atypia or presence of cancer cells in definitive histology of retroareolar tissue despite of absence of tumor cell in intraoperative retroareolar frozen section. We also included the close margin cases defined as the presence of tumor cells at the first frozen section, but after deeper core out of retroareolar tissue were revealed free of malignancy. The incidence of LRR and NAC recurrence were reported, and the factors associated were analyzed. Of 948 NSM procedures, there were 88 false-negative, frozen-sections and 10 close margin cases. The 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR and NAC recurrence was 11.2 % (10/98 patients) and 2.4 % (2/98 patients), respectively. Analyzing the definitive results of retroareolar tissue, the 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 42.9 % (n = 4) for atypia, 10 % (n = 2) for lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), 10 % (n = 1) for close margins, 8.7 % (n = 3) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 0 % for invasive carcinoma. In situ carcinoma as a primary tumor was a significant predictor of NAC recurrence (P < 0.01). Despite a high reliability of frozen section, there is still a minority of false-negative results. Nevertheless, the LRR is considerably low. This fact suggests the possibility of preservation of the NAC after discussion with the patient.

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer and Risk-Reducing Surgery: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has been gathering increased recognition as an alternative to more traditional mastectomy approaches. Initially, questions concerning its oncologic safety limited the use of NSM. Nevertheless, mounting evidence supporting the practice of NSM for both prophylactic and oncologic purposes is leading to its more widespread use and broadened indications. Using a prospectively maintained database, we reviewed our experience of 353 NSM procedures performed in 200 patients over the past 10 years. The indications for surgery were: 196 prophylactic risk-reduction (55.5%), 74 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (20.8%), 82 invasive cancer (23.2%), and 1 phyllodes tumor (0.5%). The nipple areolar complex (NAC) was entirely preserved in 341 mastectomies (96.7%). There were 11 patients (3.1%) who were found to have cancer at the nipple margin, warranting further excision. A total of 69 breasts (19.5%) had some degree of skin desquamation or necrosis, but only 12 (3.3%) required operative debridement, of which 3 breasts (1%) necessitated removal of a breast implant. Also, 6 patients (2%) were treated for infection. Of the 196 prophylactic NSMs, 11 specimens (5.6%) were found to harbor occult cancer (8 DCIS and 3 invasive cancers). One patient who underwent NSM for invasive ductal carcinoma in 2006 developed metastatic disease to her brain. No other recurrences are attributable to the 353 NSMs. The trends demonstrate the increasing acceptance of NSM as a prophylactic procedure as well as for therapeutic purposes. Although NSM is not standard, our experience supports the selective use of NSM in both prophylactic and malignant settings.

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Critical Assessment of 51 Procedures and Implications for Selection Criteria

Retrospective studies have shown that occult nipple-areolar complex (NAC) involvement in breast cancer is low, occurring in 6-10% of women undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). The cosmetic result and high patient satisfaction of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has prompted further evaluation of the oncologic safety of this procedure. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 36 self-selected patients who underwent 51 NSM procedures between 2002 and 2007. Criterion for patient selection was no clinical evidence of nipple-areolar tumor involvement. All patients had the base of the NAC evaluated for occult tumor by permanent histologic section assessment. We also evaluated tumor size, location, axillary node status, recurrence rate, and cosmetic result. Malignant NAC involvement was found in 2 of 34 NSM (5.9%) completed for cancer which prompted subsequent removal of the NAC. Of the 51 NSM, 17 were for prophylaxis, 10 for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 24 for invasive cancer. The average tumor size was 2.8 cm for invasive cancer and 2.5 cm for DCIS. Nine patients had positive axillary nodes. Overall, 94% of the tumors were located peripherally in the breast. After mean follow-up of 18 months, only two patients (5.9%) had local recurrence. Using careful patient selection and careful pathological evaluation of the subareolar breast tissue at surgery, NSM can be an oncologically safe procedure in patients where this is important to their quality of life. A prospective study based on focused selection criteria and long-term follow-up is currently in progress.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases

When the conservative treatment is not recommended, Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) is proposed more and more frequently for the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The risk of local recurrence behind the nipple areolar complex (NAC) is the main limiting factor of the NSM procedure. To minimize such risk, we proposed in 2002 a intraoperative radiotherapy of the preserved NAC. From March 2002 to November 2006, 579 cases (in 570 patients) of NSM were performed for carcinoma. The median follow up time was 19 months (Range: 1-60). The subcutaneous mastectomy was performed through an incision removing a portion of the skin overlying the tumour. An extemporaneous histological examination was performed on the retroareolar glandular tissue. If the histology was positive the patient was not considered eligible. Then an intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) of 16 Gy in one shot was delivered on the NAC area. An immediate breast reconstruction was done using implants in most cases and in several cases a musculocutaneous flaps, usually in large breast. The number of local recurrences was recorded and the correlation between their occurrence and the clinical and histological criteria were analysed using the Gray test statistical method in a competing framework. In 516 cases the negative retroareolar frozen section biopsy was confirmed by the final histology, while in 63 cases, the final histology showed foci of carcinoma. Seven out of these 63 cases underwent a secondary NAC removal. In the 56 cases which preserved areolas we did not observe any local recurrence after 19 months follow up. The probability of retro areola positive histology increases with the tumour size. and was not related to the nodal status. The rate of local relapses was 0.9% per year. We didn't find any significant difference in the local relapse rate according to different patient's and tumour's features. Most relapses were located close to the tumour bed but never in the NAC area. Our study confirms that the local recurrence rate in the NSM completed with local radiotherapy on the NAC is not higher than the usual rate observed in the literature and the preservation of the NAC does not increase the risk. The absence of local recurrence in the region where a portion of glandular tissue has been purposely preserved is a good argument in favour of ELIOT.