Nipple-areola Complex Reconstruction Research Articles

Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction Using FixNip NRI Implant after Mastectomy: An Innovative Technique.

Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction is the final stage of breast reconstruction, and it improves quality of life in patients with post-mastectomy breast cancer. We present a case of a patient with breast cancer underwent breast reconstruction and subsequent nipple-areolar complex reconstruction with an innovative biocompatible smooth silicone implant specially designed for a long-lasting restoration of the nipple-areola complex called FixNip NRI. However, to our knowledge, nipple-areolar complex reconstruction with FixNip was not previously reported. We present an emerging technique applied on a patient with breast cancer treated with skin-sparing mastectomy and with immediate breast reconstruction using an expander and then exchanged expander to breast implant. FixNip nipple reconstruction implant is implanted for the reconstruction of the areola-nipple complex with local-regional anaesthesia. She did not develop any postoperatively short-term or long-term complications, and her nipple slowly underwent to a gradual and better definition of its profile. This new approach regarding the reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex seems to be very promising in relation to both the degree of aesthetic satisfaction of patients and the ease of use by surgeons. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Satisfaction with Breasts Following Autologous Reconstruction: Assessing Associated Factors and the Impact of Revisions.

Autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) may confer higher patient reported outcomes than implant breast reconstruction, but an in-depth examination of factors associated with satisfaction after ABR is lacking. We aimed to determine independent predictors of 1-year Satisfaction with Breasts after ABR and assess the importance of elective procedures on satisfaction. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent abdominal-based ABR between 2010 and 2021 and completed the BREAST-Q Satisfaction with Breasts module at 1-year was performed. Elective procedures comprised of breast revision and nipple areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction. 959 patients were included. Satisfaction with Breasts score improved from 53 (IQR: 44 to 64) preoperatively to 64 (53 to 78) at 1-year postoperatively (p<0.001). Factors significantly associated with decreased postoperative score included lower preoperative scores (β=0.19 [95% CI: 0.08, 0.31], p=0.001), older age (β=-0.17 [-0.34, -0.01], p=0.042), Asian race (versus White, β=-6.7 [-12, -1.7], p=0.008), and a history of psychiatric diagnoses (β=-3.4 [-6.2, -0.66], p=0.015). Patients who received radiation (β=-5.6 [-9.0, -2.3], p=0.001) or had mastectomy skin flap/nipple necrosis (β=-3.8 [-7.6, -0.06], p=0.046) also had significantly decreased scores. Satisfaction with Breasts significantly improved after breast revision procedures (54 [42 to 65] to 65 [54 to 78], p<0.001) and NAC reconstruction (58 [47 to 71] to 67 [57 to 82], p<0.001). Multiple independent patient and treatment level factors are associated with lower 1-year Satisfaction with Breasts following ABR. Elective procedures have the potential to improve satisfaction. Understanding these findings is imperative for optimizing clinical decision making and managing expectations.

Abstract PO5-23-03: Impact of prosthetic nipple reconstruction after mastectomy on quality of life

Abstract Introduction Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is considered complete after nipple-areola complex (NAC) restoration, which is pivotal in restoring body image, and enhancing the psychosocial and sexual well-being of women treated for Breast Cancer (BC). Various methods, including nipple sharing, skin grafts, and local flaps with or without augmenting materials, have been proposed to achieve optimal aesthetic results. Despite these strategies, NAC flattening remains a common complication, leading to diminished aesthetic outcomes. To address this issue, a nipple reconstruction implant (NRI) (FixNip NRI™) has been developed. This study aims to assess patient quality of life (QoL) following prosthetic nipple reconstruction. Materials and Methods A multinational (Tor Vergata University and Israel) multicentric retrospective study with a prospectively maintained database was designed. The primary outcome was the comparative analysis of patients who underwent NRI with patients who received PMBR without NAC reconstruction. The Nipple Reconstruction (NR) group included patients with grade I and II capsular contracture, no active BC, and NAC reconstruction with NRI between 2019 and 2022. All patients were assessed post-surgery at 1-week, 3-months, 6-months, and 1-year intervals to measure NAC projection. In addition, satisfaction with Breasts, Physical Well-being, Psychosocial Well-being, and Sexual Well-being were evaluated using the Breast-Q score at each time interval. The NR group was compared using a propensity match score (PMS) from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing mastectomy without NAC reconstruction in the same time frame in Tor Vergata University. Breast Q score Within group and Between group analysis were performed with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Results Eleven patients were enrolled in the NR group. A total of 53 female patients were considered for the NN group. Following a PMS analysis, 11 patients were included in this study group to achieve a 1:1 ratio with the NR Group, accounting for confounding variables (Table I). In the NR group, the mean procedure time was 21 minutes. Mean NAC projections were 3.4 mm, 3.5 mm, 3.6 mm, and 3.6 mm at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. No statistically significant difference in nipple projection over time was observed. Table II presents the Breast Q score among groups at 1 week and 1 year. in the between group analysis NR group showed a statistically significant difference in all the descriptors analyzed. Within-group analysis revealed a higher value of sexual well-being in the NR group at 1 year. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, the NRI offers a promising solution for NAC reconstruction, maintaining nipple projection, and enhancing patients’ quality of life. Table I: Confounding Variable Table II: Breast Q score analysis Citation Format: Oreste Claudio Buonomo, Jonathan Caspi, Marco Materazzo, Marco Pellicciaro, Gianluca Vanni. Impact of prosthetic nipple reconstruction after mastectomy on quality of life [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-23-03.

Multimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence.

For women undergoing mastectomy, breast reconstruction can be performed by using implants or autologous tissue flaps. Mastectomy options include skin- and nipple-sparing techniques. Implant-based reconstruction can be performed with saline or silicone implants. Various autologous pedicled or free tissue flap reconstruction methods based on different tissue donor sites are available. The aesthetic outcomes of implant- and flap-based reconstructions can be improved with oncoplastic surgery, including autologous fat graft placement and nipple-areolar complex reconstruction. The authors provide an update on recent advances in implant reconstruction techniques and contemporary expanded options for autologous tissue flap reconstruction as it relates to imaging modalities. As breast cancer screening is not routinely performed in this clinical setting, tumor recurrence after mastectomy and reconstruction is often detected by palpation at physical examination. Most local recurrences occur within the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Diagnostic breast imaging continues to have a critical role in confirmation of disease recurrence. Knowledge of the spectrum of benign and abnormal imaging appearances in the reconstructed breast is important for postoperative evaluation of patients, including recognition of early and late postsurgical complications and breast cancer recurrence. The authors provide an overview of multimodality imaging of the postmastectomy reconstructed breast, as well as an update on screening guidelines and recommendations for this unique patient population. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Techniques in Nipple Areolar Reconstruction: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Interventions and Patient-reported Satisfaction Scores.

Nipple areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction often signifies completion of the breast reconstruction process for some patients and has been shown to improve both psychosocial and sexual well-being. Several techniques have been described; however, there currently exists little evidence in the literature describing outcomes or patient satisfaction. A retrospective analysis of NAC reconstructions over the last decade was queried for patient demographics, operative technique, and postoperative outcomes. A standardized, validated survey was also utilized to evaluate overall satisfaction, with a focus on aesthetic outcome, shape, color, and projection. Eighty-three patients were identified, with 49 (59.0%) completing the survey. The modalities used for reconstruction include the C-V flap (45.7%), the modified skate flap technique (42.2%), and free nipple grafting (FNG, 12.0%). No significant differences in age, BMI, or comorbidities were found among the three types. The most utilized donor site for skate flap reconstruction was the suprapubic area (37.1%). There were also no significant differences in complication rate (C-V 10.5%, FNG 10%, skate 5.7%, P = 0.630) or revision surgery (C-V 2.6%, FNG 0%, skate 5.7%, P = 0.732). The most common complication was nipple necrosis. Adjusting for time to follow-up using multivariate analysis, there was a significant difference in overall patient satisfaction when compared across all three techniques, with the modified skate flap having the highest mean overall satisfaction scores. NAC reconstruction can be completed safely and effectively with a variety of techniques. The modified skate flap technique was associated with high levels of patient satisfaction and a low complication rate.

Staged Immediate Nipple Reconstruction With Tube Flap in Immediate Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

In the setting of immediate breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, the excessive DIEP flap skin is de-epithelialized and then buried under the mastectomy skin. In this study, by virtue of tube flap technique, we hypothesize that the skin supposed to be abandoned could be transferred to the apex of reconstructed breast mound for nipple reconstruction. A total of 60 female patients were recruited between January 2019 and December 2020. All these patients underwent mastectomy including nipple-areola complex and immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction. A ladder-shaped pedicled flap was raised from the DIEP flap and rolled into a tube. The free end of tube flap was inset into the future nipple position of the reconstructed breast mound 1 week later. After revascularization for 1 month, we divided the previous pedicle and used the tube on the apex of the breast mound to recreate a new nipple. All reconstructed breasts and nipples survived well postoperatively. The average nipple projection was 12.5 ± 2.0 mm immediately after the surgery, which gradually decreased to 9.4 ± 1.5 mm at 1-year follow-up, with the projection loss from the initial measurement as 24.9% ± 1.8%. In total, 51 patients considered the overall impression of breast and nipple reconstruction to be very good or good. We provided an ideal technique that could improve the maintenance of reconstructed nipple projection and have aesthetically acceptable outcomes, without DIEP flap tissue loss, breast mound distortion, or additional scars.

Reconstruction of the human nipple-areolar complex: a tissue engineering approach.

Introduction: Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction after breast cancer surgery is challenging and does not always provide optimal long-term esthetic results. Therefore, generating a NAC using tissue engineering techniques, such as a decellularization-recellularization process, is an alternative option to recreate a specific 3D NAC morphological unit, which is then covered with an in vitro regenerated epidermis and, thereafter, skin-grafted on the reconstructed breast. Materials and methods: Human NACs were harvested from cadaveric donors and decellularized using sequential detergent baths. Cellular clearance and extracellular matrix (ECM) preservation were analyzed by histology, as well as by DNA, ECM proteins, growth factors, and residual sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) quantification. In vivo biocompatibility was evaluated 30days after the subcutaneous implantation of native and decellularized human NACs in rats. In vitro scaffold cytocompatibility was assessed by static seeding of human fibroblasts on their hypodermal side for 7days, while human keratinocytes were seeded on the scaffold epidermal side for 10days by using the reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) technique to investigate the regeneration of a new epidermis. Results: The decellularized NAC showed a preserved 3D morphology and appeared white. After decellularization, a DNA reduction of 98.3% and the absence of nuclear and HLA staining in histological sections confirmed complete cellular clearance. The ECM architecture and main ECM proteins were preserved, associated with the detection and decrease in growth factors, while a very low amount of residual SDS was detected after decellularization. The decellularized scaffolds were in vivo biocompatible, fully revascularized, and did not induce the production of rat anti-human antibodies after 30days of subcutaneous implantation. Scaffold in vitro cytocompatibility was confirmed by the increasing proliferation of seeded human fibroblasts during 7days of culture, associated with a high number of living cells and a similar viability compared to the control cells after 7days of static culture. Moreover, the RHE technique allowed us to recreate a keratinized pluristratified epithelium after 10days of culture. Conclusion: Tissue engineering allowed us to create an acellular and biocompatible NAC with a preserved morphology, microarchitecture, and matrix proteins while maintaining their cell growth potential and ability to regenerate the skin epidermis. Thus, tissue engineering could provide a novel alternative to personalized and natural NAC reconstruction.

Immediate Partial Breast and Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction Using a Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap.

The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap is a versatile flap that has been described for various applications, mostly for lower extremity coverage and head and neck reconstructions. However, there are few publications reporting its use for breast reconstruction, mainly because of its low volume availability. In this article, we present the case of a patient who successfully underwent a partial breast and immediate nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction with an SCIP flap. She had been previously reconstructed with an implant after a nipple-sparing mastectomy, but the NAC turned out to be involved with cancer needing further resection. Our goal with this article, is to introduce a novel concept for addressing partial breast and NAC reconstruction and mostly, to illustrate the importance of an adaptable surgical plan based on every individual case emphasizing the versality of microsurgery for breast cancer reconstruction.

Sequential breast and nipple-areolar complex reconstruction after soft tissue necrosis following augmentation mastopexy: a case report

Breast augmentation mastopexy is a common procedure in cosmetic plastic surgery. Augmentation mastopexy has proven to be a relatively safe operation, but surgeons should be aware of and able to cope with disastrous complications such as soft tissue necrosis and nipple loss. The most important consideration in breast reconstruction is the recovery of breast shape and symmetry, as well as the maintenance of the shape of the nipple-areolar complex without any complications. We experienced a case of sequential breast and nipple-areolar complex reconstruction, in which the purse-string suture technique was used to repair medium-sized circular defects accompanied by nipple loss in the central area of both breasts and to preserve the shape of both breast mounds. Modified CV flaps were performed for left nipple reconstruction, and the Elsahy method and the purse-string suture technique were used to reconstruct the right nipple. Tattooing was performed on both breasts for areolar reconstruction. Through sequential reconstruction, the patient achieved satisfactory aesthetic results. In medium-sized, round defects on the central breast accompanied by nipple loss, the pursestring technique is a simple and effective reconstructive option that enables maintenance of the breast mound shape without requiring additional incision or distortion of surrounding structures.

The star approach, a surgical approach for skin sparing mastectomy and central lumpectomies

When preservation of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is not possible in oncologic breast surgery, the traditional approaches are either a horizontal incision centered on the NAC resulting in visible scars and breast distortion, or a round block with risk of healing difficulties. To address these concerns, the authors propose a star approach technique for skin sparing mastectomies and lumpectomies of central breast tumors. During the oncologic surgery, the NAC is removed with four cutaneous extensions, which can be closed as a cross-shaped scar. The scarring is similar in size to the original NAC diameter and can easily be covered by the NAC reconstruction. This technique offers good exposure during surgery, a good aesthetic result with limited scarring, no breast deformity, correction of breast sagging, and high-quality healing.

One-stop autologous breast reconstruction: A safe and effective cost-saving pathway

Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction usually require further operations as part of their reconstructive journey. This involves contralateral breast symmetrization and nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction. Restrained access to elective operating space led us to implement a one-stop breast reconstruction pathway. Patients undergoing contemporaneous contralateral breast symmetrization and immediate NAC reconstruction with free nipple grafts between July 2020 and June 2021 were identified. A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was conducted, to retrieve surgical notes, postoperative complications, and length of inpatient stay. A cost analysis was performed considering savings from contralateral symmetrization. A total of 50 eligible cases were identified, which had unilateral one-stop breast reconstructions. Complication rates and length of stay were not affected by this approach, with only one free flap being lost for this cohort. This approach resulted in £181,000 being saved for our service over a calendar year. A one-stop breast reconstruction pathway has proven to be safe and effective in our unit. During these uncertain times, it has streamlined the management of eligible patients, while releasing capacity for other elective operations. Patients avoid having to wait for secondary procedures, finishing their reconstructive pathway earlier. We plan to continue providing this service which has shown to be beneficial clinically and financially.

Centrally located breast carcinomas treated with central quadrantectomy and immediate nipple-areola reconstruction: a cohort study.

Mastectomy has often been cited as the favoured option for centrally located breast tumours because lumpectomies or quadrantectomies that remove the nipple-areola complex often result in poor cosmesis. Currently, breast-conserving treatment is a preferred treatment for centrally located breast tumours, but this approach requires oncoplastic breast technique to avoid aesthetic sequels. This article describes the use of breast reduction techniques with immediate nipple-areola complex reconstruction (utilised to treat breast cancer) for centrally sited breast tumours PATIENTS: Ten patients suffering from a centrally located breast carcinoma were treated at our breast unit over a period of 16 years (2006-2022). Oncologic and patient-reported outcomes were updated revising electronic reports and surveying with BREAST-Q module Breast conserving therapy (version 2, Spanish) postoperative scales. Excision margins were complete in all cases. There have been no postoperative complications, all patients are alive and no cases of recurrence after 84.8 months of mean follow-up. Patients score the domain satisfaction with breast: mean 61.7 (Standard deviation 12.5) out of 100. Breast reduction mammaplasty with immediate nipple-areola complex reconstruction allows surgeons to carry out a central quadrantectomy to treat centrally located breast carcinoma with good oncologic and cosmetic outcome.

A new oncoplastic technique with immediate nipple reconstruction for central breast tumors using Würinger's septum-based flap

IntroductionCentrally located breast tumors represent a challenge for both oncological and reconstructive surgeons, mainly due to the necessity of nipple-areola complex (NAC) removal. We describe an original oncoplastic solution utilizing a displacement flap technique with immediate nipple reconstruction. MethodsSince 2008, we developed an oncoplastic technique using a septum-based island flap for the reconstruction of central breast defects, including the NAC. This technique is based on the Würinger's septum which is centered around the intercostal perforators. A retrospective study was performed collecting data on patient characteristics, oncological features, and outcomes. Patient satisfaction was reported using a Likert scale. ResultsReconstruction was successfully realized in 15 patients (14 immediate and one delayed post-lumpectomy correction). In immediate surgery, the excision margins were all free of tumor. Minor complications occurred in three patients; one small area of skin necrosis was managed by secondary intention, and two cases of partial nipple necrosis were treated by debridement under local anesthesia. Contralateral symmetrization surgery was performed on nine patients. Patient satisfaction scored high. ConclusionIn comparison with the previous oncoplastic techniques used for reconstructing central defects, the septum-based island flap has increased flexibility, provides better projection, and can be combined with immediate NAC reconstruction.

Immediate Reconstruction of the Nipple-areola Complex Using Inferior Pedicle Skin for Central Tumors of the Breast.

Summary:The nipple-areola complex (NAC) must be considered as an integral part of the breast with regard to morale and self-assurance. Achieving good aesthetic outcome is a challenge after excision of the NAC in retroareolar tumors. This article looks into immediate reconstruction of the NAC using inferior pedicle skin in patients after central excision of retroareolar tumors. Sixteen patients had breast conservation surgery for retroareolar tumors by a single surgeon between September 2016 and November 2021, and six of them had nipple-areola reconstruction with inferior pedicle skin. None of the patients having NAC reconstruction had any recorded complications and none needed reexcision of the margins. Five out of six patients undergoing NAC reconstruction had good to excellent aesthetic outcome as recorded in the patient questionnaire. There was no locoregional recurrence or distant metastasis in the whole group after a median follow-up of 17 months (2–62).

Mutual understanding in the field of gender affirmation surgery: A systematic review of techniques and preferences for top surgery in nonbinary patients

Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) has taken great strides, allowing patients to live in bodies affirming their gender identities. This study reviews the unique nonbinary surgical and aesthetic techniques and preferences for top surgery to aid surgeons and patients in discussions surrounding this procedure. A literature review was conducted to include “nonbinary,” “gender identity,” “top surgery” and related terms. Peer-reviewed manuscripts addressing any gender-affirming top surgery technique in patients identifying as nonbinary and other synonymous terms were included. Of 818 non-duplicate studies identified, 10 met inclusion criteria. Most reported chest masculinization techniques in nonbinary patients. They most commonly underwent the double incision technique (88.8%), similar to transgender patients. However, nonbinary patients preferred a nonflat, androgynous-appearing chest, versus a flatter, masculine-appearing chest in transgender patients. Breast reduction provided increased flexibility for nonbinary patients to present as feminine or chest bind to present as masculine. Nonbinary patients differed in preferences for the nipple areolar complex (NAC), either preferring larger, rounder NAC located closer to the chest meridian with preserved sensitivity, or forgoing NAC reconstruction altogether. No studies reporting chest feminization techniques in nonbinary patients assigned male at birth (AMAB) were found. Nonbinary patients seeking chest masculinization prefer fuller chests with larger, sensitive NAC located closer to the chest meridian compared to transgender patients. No published studies discuss chest feminization, despite an estimated one-third of nonbinary patients being AMAB. Further studies are needed to provide patient-reported preferences and determine external factors possibly influencing decisions to undergo top surgery.

Sexual Well-Being After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Does Preservation of the Nipple Matter?

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction (immediate or delayed) with and without nipple preservation. All female patients undergoing mastectomy between 2011 and 2015 at Mayo Clinic Rochester were identified and were mailed the BREAST-Q survey. Breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being were evaluated and compared by surgery type using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for univariate analysis and linear regression for multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders. Of 1547 patients, 771 completed the BREAST-Q survey (response rate 50%). Of these 771 respondents, 237 (31%) did not have reconstruction, 198 (26%) had nipple-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction (NSM), and 336 (44%) had skin-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction (SSM) ± nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction (via surgery±tattoo). Patients with breast reconstruction had consistently higher BREAST-Q scores versus those without. Comparing NSM with all SSMs, there was no difference in satisfaction with breasts (mean 71.8 vs. 70.2, p=0.21) or psychosocial well-being (mean 81.9 vs. 81.3, p=0.47); however, sexual well-being was significantly higher in the NSM group on univariate (mean 64.5 vs. 58.0, p=0.002) and multivariable (β=-4.69, p=0.03) analysis. Sexual well-being scores were similar for NSM and the SSM subgroups with any type of NAC reconstruction. This study demonstrates that NSM positively impacts patient sexual well-being after breast reconstruction compared with SSM, particularly SSM without nipple reconstruction or tattoo. SSM with any type of NAC reconstruction achieved similar satisfaction and sexual well-being to those undergoing NSM.

Outcome Analysis Depending on the Different Types of Incision following Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Background Immediate breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is widely used for its cosmetic benefits. Due to the lack of guidelines, the types of incisions in NSM vary and which method is superior remains a debate. In this study, we hypothesized that the periareolar incision has a higher risk of complications, such as nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis, than other incisions. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted and divided into three groups: the periareolar, radial, and lateral incision groups. The reconstruction method and complications of NAC necrosis, wound dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, infection, and reconstruction failure were investigated. Results A total of 103 patients (periareolar incision (33%, n = 34), radial incision (39.8%, n = 41), and lateral incision (27.2%, n = 28)) who underwent NSM and immediate breast reconstruction from 2018 to 2020 were included. The reconstruction methods were direct-to-implant, DIEP flap, LD flap, and PAP flap, and there was all of which had no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the reconstruction method (p=0.257). In terms of complications, there was no significant difference in NAC necrosis (29.4%, 19.5%, and 21.4%, in the periareolar, radial, and lateral groups, respectively; p=0.578), wound dehiscence, seroma or hematoma, infection, and reconstruction failure. Conclusion Breast reconstruction following NSM through periareolar incision does not increase the incidence of complications, including NAC necrosis. However, since only Asian patients with low BMI were included, if an appropriate patient group is selected for immediate reconstruction after NSM, reconstruction can be safely performed through the periareolar incision, and good cosmetic results can be obtained.

The "Five-flap" Technique for Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction.

Background:Nipple–areola complex reconstruction aims to be the last step in the postmastectomy treatment procedure. Different techniques have been developed with the purpose of achieving optimal symmetry in position, size, shape, pigmentation, and permanent projection of the reconstructed nipple, but to date, there is no gold standard technique. The five-flap technique provides an easy, simple nipple–areola complex reconstruction method, effectively maintaining longer nipple projection, with a negligible rate of complications.Methods:From November 2018 to April 2021, a total of 21 female patients with an absent unilateral nipple–areolar complex due to postoncological mastectomy were subjected to our technique consisting of a combination of local flaps and a full-thickness skin graft. Patients were observed for 6 months to estimate the percentage of the nipple projection loss. Overall satisfaction was evaluated by the patients themselves and by an external medical observer at the end of the follow-up period.Results:None of the reconstructed nipples experienced either total or partial necrosis. Two minor complications were observed. Nipple projection loss was negligible with an average reduction of 12% from the initial projection. The nipple–areolar complex shape remained excellent in all cases, with minimal alteration of the immediate postoperative results. The total average satisfaction score was 8.0 for patients and 9.0 for external observers.Conclusion:The five-flap technique represents a simple, safe, and efficacious procedure in patients with implant-based reconstruction requiring moderate to very projected nipples.

Viability of acellular biologic graft for nipple-areolar complex reconstruction in a non-human primate model

Many of the > 3.5 million breast cancer survivors in the US have undergone breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Patients report that nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction is psychologically important, yet current reconstruction techniques commonly result in inadequate shape, symmetry, and nipple projection. Our team has developed an allogeneic acellular graft for NAC reconstruction (dcl-NAC) designed to be easy to engraft, lasting, and aesthetically pleasing. Here, dcl-NAC safety and host-mediated re-cellularization was assessed in a 6-week study in rhesus macaque non-human primates (NHPs). Human-derived dcl-NACs (n = 30) were engrafted on the dorsum of two adult male NHPs with each animal’s own nipples as controls (n = 4). Weight, complete blood counts, and metabolites were collected weekly. Grafts were removed at weeks 1, 3, or 6 post-engraftment for histology. The primary analysis evaluated health, re-epithelialization, and re-vascularization. Secondary analysis evaluated re-innervation. Weight, complete blood counts, and metabolites remained mostly within normal ranges. A new epidermal layer was observed to completely cover the dcl-NAC surface at week 6 (13–100% coverage, median 93.3%) with new vasculature comparable to controls at week 3 (p = 0.10). Nerves were identified in 75% of dcl-NACs (n = 9/12) at week 6. These data suggest that dcl-NAC is safe and supports host-mediated re-cellularization.

Patient Satisfaction Increases with Nipple Reconstruction following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Nipple reconstruction has been linked to patient satisfaction; however, there is debate about the validity of these findings in autologous breast reconstruction patients. This study hypothesized that satisfaction would increase with nipple reconstruction following autologous breast reconstruction. A comparison study was performed of autologous breast reconstruction patients. Patients completed a survey that included BREAST-Q and nipple satisfaction measures. A chart review identified reconstructive details. A total of 191 patients completed the survey (48 percent response rate), with an average age of 53.7 ± 10.0 years and follow-up time of 2.8 ± 1.5 years. Nipple-areola complex reconstruction was completed in 33 percent of patients (63 of 191). Nipple-areola complex tattoos were used most frequently [n = 37 (58 percent)], followed by local flaps [n = 10 (16 percent)], free nipple-areola complex grafts [n = 9 (14 percent)], and a combination of local flaps and tattoos [n = 7 (11 percent)]. In comparison to women who did not undergo nipple-areola complex reconstruction, women who underwent any type of nipple reconstruction had a statistically higher BREAST-Q score for Sexual Well-Being (60 ± 24 versus 50 ± 22; p = 0.01), Postoperative Satisfaction with Breasts (65 ± 11 versus 61 ± 12; p = 0.01), and Satisfaction with Surgeon (97 ± 6 versus 93 ± 16; p = 0.009). The average nipple satisfaction score was 74 ± 19. There were correlations between the nipple satisfaction score and BREAST-Q scores for Sexual Well-Being (r = 0.50; p < 0.001), Psychosocial Well-Being (r = 0.43; p < 0.001), and Postoperative Satisfaction with Breasts (r = 0.43; p < 0.001). Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex is an important part of autologous breast reconstruction, resulting in increased sexual well-being and satisfaction with reconstructed breasts.