Abstract Introduction Wrist actigraphy is a standard for monitoring sleep in the field; however, data quality is reduced if participants remove the device. The Actigpatch is a novel, adhesive water-resistant wearable that we have previously demonstrated as comparable to wrist actigraphy for traditional sleep-wake estimation. Here we compare assessment of nonparametric activity indexes. Methods While following fixed schedules, 39 participants simultaneously wore the Micro Motionlogger actigraph (Ambulatory Monitoring Inc., Ardley, NY) on their non-dominant wrist and the Actigpatch (Circadian Positioning Systems, Newport, RI) over the triceps of their dominant arm. Our analyses included 35 participants (21F; 32.9±13.2yrs) who contributed ≥four nights of data (range: 4-14 [mean: 10] nights). After matching devices’ tri-axial actimetry in one-minute epochs, we derived key non-parametric parameters of diurnal activity and calculated intraclass correlations to measure agreement. The non-parametric parameters include interdaily stability (IS), intradaily variability (IV), timing of the five hours of lowest activity (L5onset) and ten hours of highest activity (M10onset), and overall relative amplitude (RA). Results We observed agreement ranging from good for IS (ICC=0.77 [95%CI=0.59;0.88]; [all mean differences are patch-watch] mean difference=-0.21) to poor for IV (ICC=0.43 [0.12;0.67]; mean difference=0.29). ICC showed good agreement for M10onset (ICC=0.82 [0.67; 0.90]; mean difference=-37min) and excellent agreement for L5onset (ICC=0.91 [0.82;0.95]; mean difference=-2min). Finally, we identified good agreement when estimating the activity relative amplitude (RA ICC=0.86 [0.75; 0.93]; mean difference=0.03). An example of excellent agreement was manifested in the close estimation of L5onset (patch mean=1:04am, SD=70min; watch mean=1:06am, SD=68min). Conclusion Adding to our prior evidence that these two devices offer similar sleep-wake estimation using traditional algorithms, the present data indicate the Actigpatch offers good agreement to the Motionlogger for nonparametric analyses of IS, activity timing, and RA. Agreement was not as good for IV, with the Actigpatch showing more intradaily variability than the watch, perhaps due to the triceps placement. Because the Actigpatch is unobtrusive, water-resistant, and can be worn continuously for three weeks, it has potential benefits for studies of individuals who struggle with adherence to wearing wrist worn devices. Support (if any) R01AA025593, P20GM139743. Actigpatches provided by Circadian Positioning Systems.