Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) are a frequently challenging setting for interventionists. Treatment of these lesions is associated with complications and unfavorable outcomes in terms of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or repeat revascularization [ 1 Al Suwaidi J. Berger P.B. Rihal C.S. Garratt K.N. Bell M.R. Ting H.H. Bresnahan J.F. Grill D.E. Holmes D.R. Immediate and long-term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for true bifurcation le- sions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000; 35: 929-936 Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar , 2 Al Suwaidi J. Yeh W. Cohen H.A. Detre K.M. Williams D.O. Holmes Jr., D.R. Immediate and one-year outcome in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions in the modern era (NHLBI dynamic registry). Am. J. Cardiol. 2001; 87: 1139-1144 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (206) Google Scholar ]. The difficulties encountered to treat CBLs have led to development of alternative techniques like provisional stenting, actually the recommended modality of CBL treatment, rather than two stents technique, with or without final kissing balloon inflation [ 3 Piraino D. Carella M. Buccheri D. Andolina G. Bifurcation lesions: bioresorbable vascular scaffold and drug coated balloon, an efficacy association. Lessons from optimal coherence tomography. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016; 212: 92-93 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar , 4 Lassen J.F. Holm N.R. Stankovic G. Lefèvre T. Chieffo A. Hildick-Smith D. Pan M. Darremont O. Ferenc R.A.M. Louvard Y. Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European bifurcation club meetings. EuroIntervention. 2014; 10: 545-560 Crossref PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar ].