New-onset Atrial Fibrillation Flutter Research Articles

Is thyroid function testing necessary in all cases of new onset atrial fibrillation diagnosed in the emergency department? - a real-life study

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia worldwide. It increases the risk for comorbidities and prompt management is thus important. One established risk factor for AF development is hyperthyroidism, and concomitant disease significantly impacts morbidity in these patients. Therefore, thyroid function testing is recommended in new-onset AF (NOAF) by the European Society of Cardiology. There are few studies examining the prevalence of previously undiagnosed hyperthyroidism in cases of NOAF, especially if diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, previous studies often relied upon thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels to identify cases of hyperthyroidism, this approach is susceptible for diagnostic errors since TSH profiles can overlap in conditions like hyperthyroidism, non-thyroid illness, and central hypothyroidism (of which only the former is associated with AF). Because of this, it's essential to incorporate additional biomarkers for a more precise differentiation. Purpose We aim to evaluate the prevalence of previously undiagnosed hyperthyroidism in a real-life NOAF population admitted to and diagnosed in the ED with a 2.5-years follow-up. Furthermore, we aim to interpret thyroid dysfunctions in relation to TSH as well as free thyroid hormone levels and other relevant biomarkers. Methods This retrospective registry-based cohort study included all patients attending the ED at a medium-sized hospital in Sweden during 2018 and 2020. Inclusion criteria: main diagnosis of AF (ICD I48) and ≥18 years old. Exclusion criteria: multiple visits, previous AF, abnormal thyroid function within the previous 2 years, and current thyroid hormone substitution. Results Patients from a total of 1020 ED visits were screened for eligibility. After exclusion, 325 patients with NOAF were included in the analysis. Of those, 106 (33%) and 232 (71%) had undergone thyroid function testing in the ED and by the end of the 2.5-years follow-up, respectively. We found no cases of hyperthyroidism in the ED and only two cases (1% prevalence) during the 2.5-years follow-up. Conclusions In this real-life cohort we found modest thyroid testing rates in the ED, however, a majority of patients underwent testing during follow-up. Despite this, we found no cases of hyperthyroidism in the ED and only two cases during follow-up, this is considerably lower than previously reported and may raise a question whether all patients should undergo thyroid testing, or if thyroid testing should be directed towards those with a suspected thyroid disease.

Association Between the Frailty and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Among Elderly Hypertensive Patients

BackgroundFrailty was found to be common in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), but there was still a lack of evidence regarding the relationship between frailty and new-onset AF.MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of data from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). In addition, we evaluated the relationship between baseline frailty status and new-onset AF in older adult patients with hypertension.ResultsIn total, 7,316 participants were included in our analysis, and a total of 115 new-onset AF occurred during an average of 3.54 years of follow-up. Using SPRINT frailty index criteria, 1,535 fit, 4,041 less fit, and 1,740 frailty were enrolled. Compared with other groups, the incidence of new-onset AF in the frailty group was significantly higher. We constructed three Cox models to assess the relationship between the frailty status (fit group as reference) and new-onset AF. Participants with frailty had a significantly higher risk of new-onset AF compared with the fit group in all the models we used. We combined the fit group and the less fit group into a no frailty group to assess the impact of frailty on new-onset AF in various subgroups. After full adjustment (Model 3), frailty remained associated with the increased risk of new-onset AF compared with the no frailty group [hazard ratio [HR] = 2.09, 95% CI:(1.41, 3.09), p < 0.001]. Additionally, we examined the frailty index as continuous variable to assess the relationship between the frailty index and new-onset AF. The smooth curve showed that log HR appeared to increase linearly. And there was a significant interaction between baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) categories and frailty on the risk of new-onset AF (p for interaction = 0.030).ConclusionThis study found baseline frailty status was a strong independent risk factor for new-onset AF among older adult patients with hypertension. Screening for frailty should be considered in older adult patients with hypertension to prevent new-onset AF.

Incidence and Implications of Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter in Hypertension: Insights From the SPRINT Trial.

We evaluated the impact of intensive blood pressure control on the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) and the prognostic implications of preexisting and new-onset AF in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) participants. New-onset AF was defined as occurrence of AF in 12-lead electrocardiograms after randomization in participants free of AF at baseline. Poisson regression modeling was used to calculate incident rates of new-onset AF. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (composite of myocardial infarction, non-myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death). In 9327 participants, 8.45% had preexisting AF, and 1.65% had new-onset AF. The incidence of new-onset AF was 4.53 per 1000-person years, with similar rates in the standard and intensive treatment arms (4.95 versus 4.11 per 1000-person years; adjusted P=0.14). Participants with preexisting AF (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.46-2.31]; P<0.001) and new-onset AF (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.45 [95% CI, 1.58-3.80]; P<0.001) had a greater risk for development of adverse cardiovascular events compared with those with no AF. Participants with preexisting AF who achieved blood pressure <120/80 mm Hg at 3 months continued have a poor prognosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.32-2.70]; P=0.001) compared with those with no AF. Intensive blood pressure control does not diminish the incidence of new-onset AF in an older, high-risk, nondiabetic population. Both preexisting and new-onset AF have adverse prognostic implications. In participants with preexisting AF, residual cardiovascular risk is evident even with on-treatment blood pressure <120/80 mm Hg. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

INCIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN HYPERTENSION: INSIGHTS FROM THE SPRINT TRIAL

This study sought to determine the effect of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) and to assess the prognostic implications of preexisting and new-onset AF in the randomized, multicenter Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (

Patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Previous randomized controlled trials (RCT) failed to demonstrate benefits of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure (PFO-C) over medical therapy (MT) for secondary prevention of cryptogenic ischemic stroke. Three recently published RCTs, however, turned out positive for PFO-C and warrant an updated meta-analysis. Data from all available RCTs on PFO-C vs. MT for secondary prevention of cryptogenic ischemic stroke up until October 2017 were abstracted and analyzed in a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clinical efficacy outcomes were recurrent stroke, recurrent TIA, and their combination; safety outcomes were mortality, major bleeding, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (NOAF). Five trials including a total of 3440 patients were included in the meta-analysis. PFO-C significantly reduced recurrent stroke [odds ratio (OR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.90; p = 0.03] and the combination of recurrent stroke + TIA (OR 0.53, CI 0.36-0.80; p = 0.002) compared to MT; recurrent TIA alone showed no differences (OR 0.77; CI 0.51-1.14; p = 0.19). NOAF was significantly more frequent after PFO-C (OR 5.75, CI 3.09-10.70; p < 0.00001). Mortality (OR 0.80, CI 0.39-1.67), major bleeding (OR 0.96, CI 0.48-1.92), and VTE (OR 2.45, CI 0.75-7.99) remained neutral. Trials with superior patient selection for PFO-C showed advantageous results compared to MT. PFO-C after cryptogenic ischemic stroke is safe and effective to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and recurrent stroke + TIA, albeit with an increased risk for NOAF.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Obesity, and the Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation

This study sought to identify whether obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) independently predict incident atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF). Obesity is a risk factor for AF, and OSA is highly prevalent in obesity. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with AF, but it is unknown whether OSA predicts new-onset AF independently of obesity. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 3,542 Olmsted County adults without past or current AF who were referred for an initial diagnostic polysomnogram from 1987 to 2003. New-onset AF was assessed and confirmed by electrocardiography during a mean follow-up of 4.7 years. Incident AF occurred in 133 subjects (cumulative probability 14%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9% to 19%). Univariate predictors of AF were age, male gender, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, smoking, body mass index, OSA (hazard ratio 2.18, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.54) and multiple measures of OSA severity. In subjects <65 years old, independent predictors of incident AF were age, male gender, coronary artery disease, body mass index (per 1 kg/m2, hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.10), and the decrease in nocturnal oxygen saturation (per 0.5 U log change, hazard ratio 3.29, 95% CI 1.35 to 8.04). Heart failure, but neither obesity nor OSA, predicted incident AF in subjects > or =65 years of age. Obesity and the magnitude of nocturnal oxygen desaturation, which is an important pathophysiological consequence of OSA, are independent risk factors for incident AF in individuals <65 years of age.

Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Severe Heart Failure

Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) and heart failure often coexist; however, the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the incidence of AF and on the outcome of patients with new-onset AF remains undefined. In the CArdiac REsynchronisation in Heart Failure (CARE-HF) trial, 813 patients with moderate or severe heart failure were randomly assigned to pharmacological therapy alone or with the addition of CRT. The incidence of AF was assessed by adverse event reporting and by ECGs during follow-up, and the impact of new-onset AF on the outcome and efficacy of CRT was evaluated. By the end of the study (mean duration of follow-up 29.4 months), AF had been documented in 66 patients in the CRT group compared with 58 who received medical therapy only (16.1% versus 14.4%; hazard ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 1.50; P=0.79). There was no difference in the time until first onset of AF between groups. Mortality was higher in patients who developed AF, but AF was not a predictor in the multivariable model (hazard ratio 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.67; P=0.37). In patients with new-onset AF, CRT significantly reduced the risk for all-cause mortality and all other predefined end points and improved ejection fraction and symptoms (no interaction between AF and CRT; all P>0.2). Although CRT did not reduce the incidence of AF, CRT improved the outcome regardless of whether AF developed.