Trials Of New Drugs Research Articles

Time Burdens for Participants With Advanced Cancer in Phase I Trials: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Participating in phase I cancer clinical trials often entails extra visits and procedures. We describe the planned time and procedures associated with phase I trial participation. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase I cancer trials of new drugs with assessment schedules and results posted between 2020 and 2022. Trials were included if participants had advanced or metastatic disease. Our primary analysis measured the number of planned research days (PRDs; each day a clinic visit is required) per participant up to the first month of trial participation and for the entire trial duration. Secondarily, we estimated the number of research procedures. Our sample included 71 phase I trials comprising 302 cohorts. These trials enrolled 3,904 participants; the median participation duration was 2.5 months. During screening and up to the first month of participation, the median PRDs per participant was 7 (IQR, 7-10). Across the entire trial, the median PRDs per participant was 4.5 days per month (IQR, 3.30-6.20). Participants spent 15% of trial days attending planned appointments. Per trial cohort, participants were given a median of 8 (IQR, 7-11) physical examinations, 6 (IQR, 3-10) infusions, 6 (IQR, 3-12) electrocardiograms, and 1 (IQR, 1-3) biopsy. Participants commit a substantial amount of time to planned visits in phase I cancer trials, especially in the first month. Overall, they invest 15% of trial days attending planned research activities. These estimates provide a lower bound to the time participants in phase I trials donate to drug development, as our analysis excluded unplanned visits.

Phase I trials of single-agent new drugs in head and neck cancer: a scoping review.

The conventional method of drug development in oncology typically progresses through phase I, phase II and randomized phase III trials. Nevertheless, some recent drug approvals for head and neck cancer (HNC) relied on findings from single-arm phase II trials. This underscores the significance of disease-specific phase I trials as a crucial step in exploring new drugs for HNC patients. The purpose of this review is to present the currently available data of phase I clinical trials conducted in HNC and to provide an overview of ongoing therapeutic trends in HNC. We performed a scoping review of phase I trials evaluating single-agent treatments specifically designed for HNC patients. The PubMed database was searched using "(phase I) AND (head and neck)". To ensure exhaustiveness, we also performed a search from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology and American Association for Cancer Research websites. We screened 1,134 articles and selected 29 trials that met eligibility criteria, published between 1994 and 2023, for a total of 741 patients. Twenty-one trials comprised patients with different sites of HNSCC and only 8 trials (27%) focused on a specified subsite of head and neck. Most of trials investigated treatments in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) settings (86%). Immunotherapeutic agents were the most examined followed by targeted agents, cytotoxic drugs and "others" including a nanoparticle, a therapeutic gene, a fusion protein and a modulator of gene expression. Among trials reporting activity for R/M head and neck patients (n=23), the global median overall response rate (ORR) was 12% and four trials (17%) did not report any response. The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was low (7%). However, in seven trials safety results are not clearly assessable from the published data. Phase I trials of single agents designed for head and neck patients were generally safe but with a low ORR. Future development of new drugs dedicated for HNC patients that can more accurately reflect the heterogeneity of HNC and provide more detailed subgroup analyses is warranted.

Navigating the evolving landscape: A review of clinical trial regulations in India

India is the ‘hub’ of clinical trials and ranked 4th in the world. Many prominent organizations in India, such as DCGI, ICMR, DBT, CBN, GEAC, and RCGM, play a significant role in overseeing and influencing the progress of trials in the country. India realizes many gaps in the regulations of clinical trials. To increase transparency Indian government issued The NEW DRUG AND CLINICAL TRIALS RULES 2019 on 19 March 2019 which addressed the gaps. The major changes are accelerated approval, ethics committee function and role, post-trial access, compensation, pre and post-submission meetings, and new definitions. These changes attract the leading pharma company to India and also boost the Indian clinical research quality and patient safety. This review highlights the gaps in new regulations, the history of clinical trial regulations, major shortcomings of old regulations, a comparison of new and old regulations and their impact on clinical trials.

Caregiver-reported symptomburden and preferences for therapeutic goals in pediatric primary sclerosing cholangitis.

This study analyzed qualitative and quantitative survey responses from 51 pediatric primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients and caregivers using the PSC Partners Patient Registry-Our Voices survey. The most common symptoms reported by children/caregivers include: fatigue (71%), abdominal pain (69%), anxiety (59%), appetite loss (51%), insomnia (49%), and pruritus (45%). When experiencing symptoms at their worst, over half of patients/caregivers reported limitations in physically demanding activities (67%), work/school duties (63%), social life activities (55%), and activities for fun or exercise (53%). Over half of patients/caregivers expressed willingness to participate in clinical trials, however none reported ever participating in trials for new or investigational PSC drugs. This study revealed a substantial patient/caregiver-reported symptom burden for children with PSC that impacts quality of life and limits access to clinical trials. Future efforts should focus on developing patient-centered clinical endpoints for PSC trials, increasing trial availability for pediatric PSC patients, and reducing logistical barriers to trial involvement.

Effect of age on safety and efficacy of novel cancer drugs investigated in early-phase clinical trials

BackgroundElderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, particularly in early-phase studies. Our study assessed the safety and efficacy of novel anti-cancer treatments investigated in early-phase clinical trials, comparing outcomes between younger and elderly patients. MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from patients enrolled in phase I/II trials at our center between January 2014 and April 2021. We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, toxicity, and clinical efficacy, categorizing patients into younger (≤ 65 years) and elderly (> 65 years) groups. Results419 patients were included with a median age of 56 years. Among these, 107 (26 %) were older than 65 years. Predominant cancers included breast (48 %), lung (10 %), and melanoma (5 %). Patients were treated in 64 trials, predominantly receiving immunotherapy-based (47 %) or targeted therapy-based (45 %) treatment. Elderly presented with poorer ECOG performance status (P = 0.001) and had fewer prior therapy lines (P = 0.01) than younger patients. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar across age groups (31 % younger vs 33 % elderly; P = 0.7), including in combination therapy scenarios. However, elderly patients experienced more AEs with antibody-drug conjugates compared to younger counterparts (56 % vs 14 %, P = 0.036) and were more likely to discontinue treatment due to toxicity (15 % vs 7 %; P = 0.011). No significant age-related differences in response rates and survival outcomes were observed across treatment modalities, except for immunotherapy-based regimens for which elderly patients exhibited higher response rates, disease control rates, and prolonged progression-free survival. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that elderly exhibit comparable safety and efficacy outcomes to younger patients in early-phase clinical trials for new cancer drugs. This underscores the importance of including elderly patients in phase I/II trials to ensure the generalizability of study results and mitigate age-related disparities in cancer treatment access.

What has antifibrotic therapy changed for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease of unknown cause. IPF is characterized by excessive production and deposition of extracellular matrix components, which lead to irreversible violations of the architectonics of lung tissue and loss of function. Without treatment, the average survival rate of patients after diagnosis does not exceed 3–5 years. However, published observations report improved survival over the past decade, due to the advent of antifibrotic drugs and earlier diagnosis. The benefits of antifibrotic therapy include a slower rate of reduction in forced lung capacity (FVC) and a reduction in mortality. Pirfenidone and nantedanib are the only currently approved antifibrotic drugs for the treatment of IPF. Several generic drugs with the INN pirfenidone are registered on the Russian market, including the drug PIRFASPEC® (267 mg capsules). Their efficacy and safety have been demonstrated both in randomized clinical trials and in real clinical practice studies. IPF patient registries, which have been maintained in many countries since 2010, provide additional information regarding the progression of the disease, the effectiveness of therapy, and the frequency of adverse events. Although they have a different mechanism of action and safety profile, their effectiveness in slowing the decline of FVC and reducing the risk of mortality over time is similar. However, IPF is still characterized by progressive shortness of breath and poor prognosis, as treatment can only delay the progression of IPF and cannot stop or reverse the damage. Although clinical trials of new drugs for the treatment of IPF are currently underway, no other drugs have yet been approved in the Russian Federation.

Сравнительный анализ адаптивности протоколов клинических исследований к пандемии COVID-19 нескольких спонсоров

The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has put a huge strain on health systems around the world. Clinical trials of new drugs were also influenced by the pandemic, during which Sponsors came across a number of problems, including ensuring patient safety and maintaining the ability to obtain reliable data in the course of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to compare the protocols of clinical trials of two Sponsors, approved by the Russian health authorities for three years, from 2017 to 2019, by their adaptability to the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic. 23 protocols and 51 amendments were studied in total. The amendments published in 2020 by both Sponsors underwent a comparative analysis to determine the degree of their influence by the pandemic. Statistical processing of the results was carried out using the correlation analysis. Conclusions were drawn about the Sponsors’ approach to clinical trial planning and establishing the safety margin of clinical trial protocols.

Abstract 1002: The historically black colleges and universities cancer trial consortium: A way forward to diversifying cancer clinical trials

Abstract The National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network cancer guidelines state that the best management for a cancer patient is on a clinical trial. However, the demographics of 74 registration trials for oral cancer therapies from 2009 - 2019 show only 2.5% of participating patients were Black. Similarly, of the 3,593 patients enrolled in all registration trials for new cancer drugs approved by the FDA in 2019, only 4% were Black patients. A third analysis showed that between 2008 and 2018, only 3.1% of cancer trial patients were Black. The underrepresentation of Black patients in cancer clinical trials is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted solution. Complicated, interdependent causes include, but are not limited to system, provider, and patient bias. Increasing globalization of clinical trials also contributes to a widening gap in Black patient enrollment. Achieving diversity among clinical trial participants requires intention in study design regarding accrual sites and outreach, and involvement of a diverse trial workforce. The ideal clinical trial system would minimize system, provider, and patient biases. Such a system already exists in the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) system. HBCUs represent 3% of institutions of higher education in the USA, yet they enroll 16% of Black students and confer 24% of all baccalaureate degrees earned by Black students. 40% of Black engineers, 50% of Black lawyers, 70% of Black physicians, and a staggering 80% of Black judges attended an HBCU. HBCUs are exceptional at impacting communities of Color and have been doing so for centuries. The HBCU Cancer Trials Consortium (HBCU CTC) is a network of HBCUs and Ally institutions that aims to bring innovative cancer clinical trials to historically underserved communities and honor the legacy of HBCUs, which have consistently and successfully served underserved communities for over a century. The HBCU CTC will oversee and conduct cancer clinical trials at member institutions. We envision founding flagship members to include HBCUs that provide graduate medical education and training, such as Howard, Meharry, Charles Drew, and Morehouse. Non-HBCUs committed to the mission are invited to join the consortium as Ally institutions (eg. MSIs). Membership is not exclusive of membership in other cancer consortia. The HBCU CTC will provide shared resource services for member institutions that lack expertise or funding to conduct services locally (eg. data management, DSMB, biostatistics, a cancer focused IRB, central radiology, and central pathology). The Consortium will also work to develop local infrastructure support for the conduct of cancer clinical trials at member institutions. Citation Format: Sheldon L. Holder, Robert A. Winn, Wafik S. El-Deiry. The historically black colleges and universities cancer trial consortium: A way forward to diversifying cancer clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1002.

Research and development strategy of new traditional Chinese medicine drugs for syndromes based on human use experience

Chinese drug registration laws and regulations have always reserved a place for the new traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) drugs for syndromes, but so far no such new drugs have been approved for registration. This paper expounded on the relevant policies, regulations, and technologies of new TCM drugs for syndromes in China and pointed out that the application of the animal model of TCM syndromes to carry out pharmacodynamics research and clinical efficacy evaluation criteria of TCM syndromes were the main technical difficulties in the research and development of new TCM drugs for syndromes. Not all syndromes are suitable for developing new drugs, and the indications for new TCM drugs should be constant syndromes. Among the three research and development models of simple syndrome, syndrome-unified disease, and combined disease and syndrome, the research and development model of combined disease and syndrome is recommended. Clinical positioning is the key to new TCM drugs for syndromes. It is encouraged to conduct high-quality human use experience studies to determine the clinical positioning of new TCM drugs for syndromes, as well as the target population, dose, course of treatment, and initial therapeutic and safety, and apply for exemption from non-clinical effectiveness studies. Clinical trials of new TCM drugs for syndromes should take the target symptoms or signs as the main efficacy index and the efficacy of TCM syndromes as the secondary efficacy index. Clinical research program design should implement the "patient-centered" concept and introduce clinical outcome evaluation indicators. In the clinical safety evaluation, special conditions such as characteristic syndromes and changes should be considered. With the construction of the human use experience technology system and the promotion of the TCM registration and evaluation evidence system featuring the "combination of TCM theory, human use experience, and clinical trials", it is believed that many high-quality new TCM drugs for syndromes will be developed in the future.

Placebo and Nocebo Responses in Pharmacological Trials of Tic Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.

Clinical trials of new drugs for tic disorders (TD) often fail to yield positive results. Placebo and nocebo responses play a vital role in interpreting the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), yet these responses in RCTs of TD remain unexplored. The aim was to assess the magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses in RCTs of pharmacological interventions for TD and identify influencing factors. A systematic search of the Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO databases was conducted. Eligible studies were RCTs that compared active pharmacological agents with placebos. Placebo response was defined as the change from baseline in TD symptom severity in the placebo group, and nocebo response as the proportion experiencing adverse events (AEs) in this group. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore modifying factors. Twenty-four trials involving 2222 participants were included in this study. A substantial placebo response in TD symptom severity was identified, with a pooled effect size of -0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.99 to -0.59; I2 = 67%). Forty-four percent (95% CI 27% to 63%; I2 = 92%) of patients experienced AEs while taking inert pills. Sample size, study design, and randomization ratio were correlated with changes in placebo and nocebo responses. There were considerable placebo and nocebo responses in TD clinical trials. These results are of great relevance for the design of future trials and for clinical practice in TD. PROSPERO registration ID CRD42023388397. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Recent landscape and trends for industry-sponsored pediatric clinical trials in China from 2013 to 2022.

Pediatric medication is a challenging issue globally. Promoting trials of medications for children and implementing measures to encourage innovation for addressing unmet medical and health needs are important. To explore the recent landscape of pediatric clinical trials of new investigational drugs conducted by pharmaceutical enterprises in China from 2013 to 2022 to provide insight into pediatric drug development in the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory policy formulation. We performed a cross-sectional observational investigation of pediatric clinical trials registered from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2022, on the Registration and Information Disclosure Platform for Drug Clinical Trials, the official registration platform established in 2013 for trials of new investigational drugs initiated by biopharmaceutical enterprises. Trials that included pediatric participants (under 18 years old) were retrieved, and their relevant characteristics were extracted and analyzed. In total, 895 pediatric clinical trials were collected, accounting for 5.1% of the total registered clinical trials initiated prior to January 1, 2023. The overall average annual growth rate for the number of pediatric clinical trials was 12% (P < 0.001). Phase III trials accounted for the highest proportion (49.1%, 439). Of the 895 trials included, 736 (82.2%) were domestic trials, and 159 (17.8%) were international multicenter trials. In terms of tested drugs, investigations of biological products accounted for the largest proportion of trials (67.4%, 603). Among pediatric clinical trials, studies of vaccines accounted for the largest proportion of trials (41.0%, 367), followed by trials for rare diseases (17.2%, 154). Furthermore, geographical distribution analysis revealed that the largest and smallest numbers of trials were conducted in North China (35.7%, 320) and Northeast China (0.8%, 7), respectively. The growth trends for industry-sponsored clinical trials involving children illustrate the progress and increasing capability of pediatric drug development achieved in China since 2013. Current challenges and potential areas of focus for policymakers and stakeholders include investigating orphan drugs for rare diseases according to the unique epidemiological characteristics of Chinese children, expanding the scope of pediatric clinical trials, and improving the uneven geographical distribution of leading research centers.

Cortical microstructural MRI for detection of early target engagement in AD drug trials: post‐hoc analysis of exploratory outcomes from a Phase 1b safety study for XPro1595 in AD

AbstractBackgroundEvidence in support of the amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) suggests that pathological amyloid‐beta (Aβ) is initially associated with synaptic hyperactivity and accumulates in an activity dependent fashion. These findings are corroborated by longitudinal data from cohort studies with Aβ‐PET imaging, wherein Aβ accumulates first in gray matter (GM) cortices associated with the default‐mode network (DMN) before spreading in a semi‐hierarchical pattern to different neocortical regions as the disease progresses (Mattsson et al. 2019). Mapping brain regions most frequently affected by Aβ pathology at different stages of disease may provide a framework for investigation of new drug entities targeting other components of Aβ toxicity using less invasive imaging modalities. The hypothesis here is that indicators of disease specific, tissue‐level treatment effects should be first detectable in brain regions most frequently affected by active pathology.MethodXPro1595 is a selective, brain penetrant neutralizer of soluble TNF with potent anti‐neuroinflammatory effects recently assessed for safety and pharmacological activity in a small, open‐label phase‐1b dose finding study (NCT03943264) in patients with AD. Clinical trial results for patients (n = 9) with analyzable dMRIs who completed 12‐weeks of treatment with XPro1595 [0.3 mg/kg; n = 3) or (1.0 mg/kg; n = 6)] met criteria for post‐hoc analysis. Exploratory outcomes included the novel cortical diffusivity measurement PerpPD+. PerpPD+ represents the diffusion components perpendicular to cortical GM minicolumns, indicates microscopic disruption when increased, and has proven more sensitive than standard volumetrics to changes in indicators of synaptic function, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration across the AD continuum.ResultMean MMSE scores at baseline were 23.7 (SD = 2.5) and 15.8 (SD = 7.0) in the low‐dose and high‐dose groups, respectively, indicating varying degrees of severity. Week‐12 results showed decreases in bilateral PerPD+ at the whole brain level and in multiple GM cortices documented in the literature with the highest frequency of early (precuneus, isthmus cingulate, posterior cingulate, insula, and lateral and medial orbitofrontal) and late (lingual, pericalcarine, paracentral, precentral, and postcentral) Aβ accumulation (Figures1‐2).ConclusionCortical diffusivity measurements related to minicolumnar microstructure may provide an opportunity for noninvasive detection of early, disease specific, tissue‐level target engagement in clinical trials for investigational new drugs in AD.

Characteristics of clinical trials of new oncology drugs approved in China.

Since reforms were introduced to incentivize drug innovation in 2015, the Chinese pharmaceutical market has experienced unprecedented prosperity, with more new drugs than ever before, especially anticancer treatments. In 2021, Chinese regulatory agencies issued the new guideline for clinical research and development of antitumor drugs, triggering a series of responses on the drug market. Limited research has outlined the nature of the original new drugs in China to understand the dynamic response of the market. The objective of this article was to map the clinical development of approved new oncology drugs in China from 2015 to 2021 and differed from previous studies by focusing on original new drugs, using the United States as a benchmark, and elaborating the endogenous features of clinical trials. Clinical trials conducted in China have risen to a level similar to that of the United States in many aspects of trial design, but there is still distance between the implementation and operational details of clinical trials. In the meantime, China has made significant breakthroughs in drug approval. Greater than 60% of novel anticancer drugs in China received accelerated approved for their first listing. Approximately 90% of the pivotal clinical trials supporting initial drug approval used surrogate measures as end points, and one half were nonrandomized or did not have a control group. However, duplicate development without evidence of a clinical advantage compared with current therapies was widely observed. By presenting a multidimensional landscape of clinical trials and approvals in the real world, this review allows interested researchers, developers, and even regulators to understand what has been done and what should be done next in anticancer drug development in China.

Ultrasound-Induced Prenatal Stress: New Possibilities for Modeling Mental Disorders

The development of animal models of mental disorders is an important task since such models are useful for studying the neurobiological mechanisms of psychopathologies and for trial of new therapeutic drugs. One way to model pathologies of the nervous system is to impair fetal neurodevelopment through stress of the pregnant future mother, or prenatal stress (PS). The use of variable frequency ultrasound (US) in rodents is a promising method of imitating psychological stress, to which women in modern society are most often subjected. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of PS induced by exposure to variable frequency ultrasound (US PS) throughout the gestational period on the adult rat offspring, namely, to identify features of behavioral alterations and neurochemical brain parameters that can be associated with certain mental disorders in humans, to determine the possibility of creating a new model of psychopathology. Our study included a study of some behavioral characteristics of male and female rats in the elevated plus maze, open-field test, object recognition test, social interaction test, sucrose preference test, latent inhibition test, Morris water maze, forced swimming test, acoustic startle reflex, and prepulse inhibition tests. We also determined the activity of the serotonergic, dopaminergic, and noradrenergic neurotransmitter systems in the hippocampus and frontal cortex by HPLC-ED. Concentration of norepinephrine, dopamine, DOPAC, serotonin, and HIAA, as well as DOPAC/dopamine and HIAA/serotonin ratios were determined. A correlation analysis of behavioral and neurochemical parameters in male and female rats was performed based on the data obtained. The results of the study showed that US PS altered the behavioral phenotype of the rat offspring. US PS increased the level of anxious behavior, impaired orientation-research behavior, increased grooming activity, decreased the desire for social contacts, shifted behavioral reactions from social interaction to interaction with inanimate objects, impaired latent inhibition, and decreased the startle reflex. US PS activated the serotonergic, dopaminergic, and noradrenergic neurotransmitter systems of the rat frontal cortex and hippocampus. A correlation between neurochemical and behavioral parameters was revealed. Our study showed that US PS leads to a certain dysfunction on behavioral and neurochemical levels in rats that is most closely associated with symptoms of schizophrenia or autism. We hypothesize that this could potentially be an indicator of face validity for a model of psychopathology based on neurodevelopmental impairment.

Fatal BK polyomavirus-associated pneumonia: report of two cases with literature review

BackgroundIn immunocompromised populations, such as patients with AIDS and recipients of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplants, BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) can reactivate and cause several diseases, which can lead to death in their severe forms. Unlike hemorrhagic cystitis and BKPyV-associated nephropathy, BKPyV-associated pneumonia is rare, with only seven known cases worldwide. However, the disease can rapidly progress with extremely high mortality.Case presentationHerein, we report two cases of BKPyV-associated pneumonia following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Both patients had consistent infectious pneumonia and graft-versus-host disease after stem cell transplantation. The diagnosis of BKPyV-associated pneumonia was confirmed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing and polymerase chain reaction after the sudden worsening of the pulmonary infection signs and symptoms concomitant with renal dysfunction and systemic immune weakening. Both patients eventually died of systemic multi-organ failure caused by severe pneumonia.ConclusionsCurrently, BKPyV reactivation cannot be effectively prevented. Immunocompromised patients must actively manage their primary lung infections, pay close attention to pulmonary signs and imaging changes. Especially during and after steroid pulse therapy or immunosuppressive therapy for graft versus host diseases, BKPyV load in blood/urine needs to be regularly measured, and the immunosuppressive intensity should be adjusted properly after the BKPyV reactivation diagnosis. Clinical trials of new antiviral drugs and therapies for BKPyV are urgently needed.

Timing for First-in-Minor Clinical Trials of New Cancer Drugs

To describe the delay for first-in-minor cancer clinical trials and its relationship with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. We used ClinicalTrials.gov to create a sample of pediatric-relevant cancer drugs starting efficacy testing in adults from 2006 through 2011. We characterized the delay between first-in-adult efficacy trials and first-in-minor trials. We also assessed the proportion of drugs evaluated in minors that failed to gain approval, the proportions that were not evaluated in minors before receiving the FDA approval, and whether shorter delay was associated with larger effect sizes or greater probability of regulatory approval. Thirty-four percent of the 185 drugs in our cohort were evaluated in minors; the median delay to clinical trials was 4.16years. Of all drugs, 17% received the FDA approval, 41% of which were never tested in minors before licensing. Of the 153 drugs not attaining approval, 78% were not evaluated in minors. Earlier testing did not significantly predict greater response rates (P=.13). Drugs not attaining regulatory approval were evaluated significantly earlier (3.0 for drugs not approved vs 5.4years delayed testing for approved drugs, P=.019). New cancer drugs were typically evaluated in minors years after adult efficacy evaluation. This delay likely eliminated some drugs lacking desirable pharmacology before pediatric testing. However, some drugs that were eliminated may have had activity in pediatric indications. Approaches for prioritizing drugs for pediatric testing warrants further consideration.

A target map of clinical combination therapies in oncology: an analysis of clinicaltrials.gov

Combination therapies have taken center stage for cancer treatment, however, there is a lack of a comprehensive portrait to quantitatively map the current clinical combination progress. This study aims to capture clinical combination therapies of the validated FDA-approved new oncology drugs by a macro data analysis and to summarize combination mechanisms and strategies in the context of the existing literature. A total of 72 new molecular entities or new therapeutic biological products for cancer treatment approved by the FDA from 2017 to 2021 were identified, and the data on their related 3334 trials were retrieved from the database of ClinicalTrials.gov. Moreover, these sampled clinical trials were refined by activity status and combination relevance and labeled with the relevant clinical arms and drug combinations, as well as drug targets and target pairs. Combination therapies are increasingly prevalent in clinical trials of new oncology drugs. From retrospective work, existing clinical combination therapies in oncology are driven by different patterns (i.e., rational design and industry trends). The former can be represented by mechanism-based or structure-based combinations, such as targeting different domains of HER2 protein or in-series co-targeting in RAF plus MEK inhibitors. The latter is an empirically driven strategy, including redundant combinations in hot targets, such as PD-1/PD-L1, PI3K, CDK4/6, and PARP. Because of an explosion in the number of clinical trials and the resultant shortage of available patients, it is essential to rationally design drug combinations.

Inducing Cytotoxicity in Colon Cancer Cells and Suppressing Cancer Stem Cells by Dolasetron and Ketoprofen through Inhibition of RNA Binding Protein PUM1.

Clinical trials of new drugs often face a high failure rate of approximately 45 percent due to safety and toxicity concerns. Repurposing drugs with well-established safety profiles becomes crucial in addressing this challenge. Colon cancer ranks as the third most prevalent cancer and the second leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide. This study focuses on the RNA-binding protein pumilio1 (PUM1), a member of the PUF family involved in post-transcriptional gene expression regulation. By utilizing molecular docking techniques and FDA-approved drugs, potential inhibitors against PUM1 were identified. Notably, dolasetron and ketoprofen demonstrated promising results, exhibiting strong binding affinity, hydrophobic interactions, and favorable chemical reactivity according to Conceptual-DFT calculations. Both compounds effectively reduced cell viability, with IC50 values of 150 µM and 175 µM, respectively and shows long term inhibitory effects as seen by reduced in number of colonies. Moreover, they exhibited inhibitory effects on colon cancer stem cells, as indicated by reduced colonospheroid size and numbers. Apoptosis is induced by these compounds and has triggered activation of executioner caspase 3/7 in HCT116 cells which is evident through a caspase 3/7 assay and AO/EB staining, while the non-toxic effect of these compounds was evident from viability against non-cancerous cell line and hemolysis assay. Additionally, the treatment group showed a significant decrease in PUM1 and cancer stem cell markers expression compared to the control group. In conclusion, this study highlights the potential of targeting PUM1 as a novel approach to colon cancer treatment. Dolasetron and ketoprofen demonstrate promise as effective anti-cancer and anti-cancer stem cell drugs, inducing apoptosis in colon cancer cells through inhibition of PUM1.

Research on the legal regulation of experimental medicine in China

The increasing number of clinical trials of new drugs in China has brought huge benefits to the society, but also implied huge risks. This is particularly evident in experimental medicine. Germany has achieved good results in regulating experimental medical behaviors through the model of legislative norms. China should learn from Germany's beneficial experience to promote the orderly development of experimental medical behavior in China. Specifically, the crime of illegal human experiment should be added to the criminal law; Adopt special legislation model to regulate experimental medical behavior; Establish a no fault medical liability system to share experimental medical risks;Absorb and learn from the relevant norms of the international community on human experiment.

Trend of clinical trials of new drugs for rare diseases in China in recent 10 years

BackgroundRare disease is a general term for a disease that affects a small number of people but recognized as a global public health priority. Governments worldwide are paying more and more attention to the academical research and drug investment of rare diseases. The conduct of rare disease clinical trials is still difficult, despite the promotion of government policies and the awakening of social consciousness. In this article, we outlined the characteristics and obstacles of clinical trials of rare diseases in China and expected to provide reference for subsequent clinical trials in this field.ResultsIn recent years, China has made some progress in clinical trials of rare diseases in the past 10 years. There were 481 clinical trials on rare diseases in total, covering more than 10 rare diseases with high incidence. Clinical trial applications on rare diseases for a total of 481 were submitted and with an average annual growth rate of 28.2% from 2013 to 2022. The number of clinical trial application for rare diseases in 2016 dramatically increased by 80% compared to 2015 due to the policy document issued by China for clinical research in rare diseases in 2015. Besides, about 70% of applications registering for clinical trials could recruit subjects as expected. Despite this, the number of clinical trials of rare diseases in China was less compared with the United States, Europe and Japan, and the types of infant drugs were limited to biological products and chemical drugs lacking other new treatments.ConclusionsEfforts have been made in recent years to develop clinical research on rare diseases in China. The number of clinical trials for rare diseases in China was growing steadily every year, which was inseparable from the support of the country, society and rare disease patients. Still, there was a large gap between China and other developed countries in this field and this merit further investigation.