Neurotrauma Patients Research Articles

Optic nerve sheath diameter and eyeball transverse diameter in severe head injury and its correlation with intracranial pressure

BackgroundGold standard for determining intracranial pressure (ICP), intraventricular catheter, is invasive with associated risks. Non-invasive investigations like magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography have demonstrated correlation between optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and raised ICP. However, computed tomography (CT) is accessible and less operator-dependent. Literature shows variable results regarding correlations between ICP and ONSD on CT. The study aimed to investigate correlations between raised ICP and ONSD, eyeball transverse diameter (ETD), and ONSD/ETD ratios on CT scan(s) of severe head injuries. MethodsA retrospective review of a three-year prospectively-maintained database of severe traumatic head injuries in patients who had ICP measurements and CT scans was conducted. Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), ICP, ONSD 3 mm and 9 mm behind the globe, ETD, ONSD/ETD ratios, CT Marshall Grade, and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) were recorded. Statistical analysis assessed correlations between ICP and CT measurements. ResultsSeventy-four patients were assessed; mortality rate: 36.5 %. Assault (48.6 %) and pedestrian-vehicle collisions (21.6 %) were the most common mechanisms. CT Marshall Grade correlated significantly with 3 mm and 9 mm ONSD, ONSD/ETD ratios, GCS, and GCS motor score, which correlated significantly with GOS. No significant correlation was found between ICP and ONSD, ETD or ONSD/ETD ratios. Marshall Grade was not significantly associated with ICP measurements but correlated with injury severity. ConclusionsUnlike previous studies, our study not only investigated the correlation between ICP and single variables (ONSD and ETD) but also the ONSD/ETD ratios. No correlations were observed between raised ICP and ONSD, ETD or ONSD/ETD ratio on CT in neurotrauma patients.

Neurosurgical Practice, Training, and Research Capacity Assessment in Nigeria: A Methodological Approach

There has been a progressive growth of neurosurgery in Nigeria over the past 6 nulldecades. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the state of neurosurgical practice, training, and research in the country. We used a mixed-methods approach that combined a survey of neurosurgery providers and a systematic review of the neurosurgical literature in Nigeria. The 83-question online survey had 3 core sections for assessing capacity, training, and gender issues. The systematic review involved a search of 4 global databases and gray literature over a 60-year period. One hundred and forty-nine respondents (95% male) completed the survey (65.4%). Their age ranged from 20 to 68years, with a mean of 41.8 (±6.9) years. Majority were from institutions in the nation's South-West region; 82 (55.0%) had completed neurosurgery residency training, with 76 (51%) employed as consultants; 64 (43%) identified as residents in training, 56 (37.6%) being senior residents, and 15 (10.1%) each held academic appointments as lecturers or senior lecturers. The literature review involved 1,023 peer-reviewed journal publications: 254 articles yielding data on 45,763 neurotrauma patients, 196 on 12,295 pediatric neurosurgery patients, and 127 on 8,425 spinal neurosurgery patients. Additionally, 147 papers provided data on 5,760 neuro-oncology patients, and 56 on 3,203 patients with neuro-vascular lesions. Our mixed-methods approach provided significant insights into the historical, contemporary, and future trends of neurosurgery in Nigeria. The results could form the foundation for policy improvement; health-system strengthening; better resource-planning, prioritization, and allocation; and more purposive collaborative engagement in Nigeria and other low- and middle-income countries.

Adaptation and Validation of the Standardized Swallowing Assessment Tool for Patients With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common in moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) patients and can have serious consequences. Delaying feeding in these patients can also be detrimental. Nonetheless, the psychometric properties of screening tools that can promptly identify dysphagia have never been tested in these neurotrauma populations. This study aimed to: (1) adapt, translate, and validate the content of the French-Canadian version of the the Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA) tool to meet the needs of moderate-severe TBI and cervical SCI patients, (2) examine its inter-rater reliability and criterion-concurrent validation, and (3) evaluate its clinical utility from the perspectives of critical care nurses. The SSA tool was adapted and translated using an integrated method for the cultural adaptation and translation of tools. Eleven experts participated in the adaptation of the SSA tool, which led to the clarification of one item, as well as a new step and instructions for the screening procedure. Content validation (i.e., item and scale relevance) was evaluated by multidisciplinary team members (n = 17). The mean content validity index (CVI) score was 0.97 for the entire scale, while the mean CVI scores for individual items ranged from 0.82 to 1.0. A total of 60 neurotrauma patients were enrolled for inter-rater reliability and criterion-concurrent validation. Interrater reliability was determined by comparing two scores: one score from nurses responsible for the care of enrolled patients and one score from the research nurse. The weighted kappa coefficients for inter-rater reliability were 0.86 for moderate-severe TBI patients (n = 30) and 0.73 for cervical SCI patients (n = 30). A speech language therapist (SLT) also assessed dysphagia and results were used as the standard clinical reference criterion to determine concurrent validity (sensibility and specificity) of the adapted SSA tool. The sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 50% for moderate-severe TBI, and 77% and 75% for cervical SCI, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) were 65% and 87% in TBI patients, and 75% and 76% in SCI patients. Test accuracy was 71% and 77% for these same groups. The clinical utility of the tool was evaluated according to the following domains: appropriateness, accessibility of the required material, applicability, perceived effectiveness, and acceptability. Acceptability was the only domain with a level of agreement <80% (74%) among trauma critical care nurses (n = 49). Findings support the content validation and inter-rater reliability of the adapted French-Canadian version of the SSA tool in moderate-severe TBI and cervical SCI patients. Sensitivity was acceptable in both groups, but the specificity was lower, especially in moderate-severe TBI patients. Further validation of the adapted French-Canadian version of the SSA tool is needed in neurotrauma patients to confirm these results and to ensure safe dysphagia screening while avoiding oral feeding deferrals.

Which curve is better? A comparative analysis of trauma scoring systems in a South Asian country

ObjectivesA diverse set of trauma scoring systems are used globally to predict outcomes and benchmark trauma systems. There is a significant potential benefit of using these scores in low and...

Neurologic Injury-Related Predisposing Factors of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Critical Examination.

The present review aimed to identify the means through which neurologic injury can predispose individuals to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). In recent years, comprehensive studies have helped to clarify which structures in the central nervous system can lead to distinct PTSD symptoms-namely, dissociative reactions or flashbacks-when damaged. Our review narrowed its focus to three common neurologic injuries, traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and stroke. We found that in each of the three cases, individuals may be at an increased risk of developing PTSD symptoms. Beyond discussing the potential mechanisms by which neurotrauma may lead to PTSD, we summarized our current understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder and discussed predicted associations between the limbic system and PTSD. In particular, the effect of noradrenergic neuromodulatory signaling on the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis as it pertains to fear memory recall needs to be further explored to better understand its effects on limbic structures in PTSD patients. At present, altered limbic activity can be found in both neurotrauma and PTSD patients, suggesting a potential causative link. Particularly, changes in the function of the limbic system may be associated with characteristic symptoms of PTSD such as intrusive memories and acute psychological distress. Despite evidence demonstrating the correlation between neurotrauma and PTSD, a lack of PTSD prognosis exists in TBI, SAH, and stroke patients who could benefit from early treatment. It should be noted that PTSD symptoms often compound with pre-existing issues, further deteriorating health outcomes for these patients. It is ultimately our goal to clarify the relationship between neurotrauma and PTSD so that earlier diagnoses and appropriate treatment are observed in clinic.

Practice-Pattern Variation in Sedation of Neurotrauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: An International Survey.

Background: Analgo-sedation plays an important role during intensive care management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, however, limited evidence is available to guide practice. We sought to quantify practice-pattern variation in neurotrauma sedation management, surveying an international sample of providers. Methods: An electronic survey consisting of 56 questions was distributed internationally to neurocritical care providers utilizing the Research Electronic Data Capture platform. Descriptive statistics were used to quantitatively describe and summarize the responses. Results: Ninety-five providers from 37 countries responded. 56.8% were attending physicians with primary medical training most commonly in intensive care medicine (68.4%) and anesthesiology (26.3%). Institutional sedation guidelines for TBI patients were available in 43.2%. Most common sedative agents for induction and maintenance, respectively, were propofol (87.5% and 88.4%), opioids (60.2% and 70.5%), and benzodiazepines (53.4% and 68.4%). Induction and maintenance sedatives, respectively, are mostly chosen according to provider preference (68.2% and 58.9%) rather than institutional guidelines (26.1% and 35.8%). Sedation duration for patients with intracranial hypertension ranged from 24 h to 14 days. Neurological wake-up testing (NWT) was routinely performed in 70.5%. The most common NWT frequency was every 24 h (47.8%), although 20.8% performed NWT at least every 2 h. Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale targets varied from deep sedation (34.7%) to alert and calm (17.9%). Conclusions: Among critically ill TBI patients, sedation management follows provider preference rather than institutional sedation guidelines. Wide practice-pattern variation exists for the type, duration, and target of sedative management and NWT performance. Future comparative effectiveness research investigating these differences may help optimize sedation strategies to promote recovery.

Palliative Care in Severe Neurotrauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide and many patients with TBI require intensive care unit (ICU) management. When facing a life-threatening illness, such as TBI, a palliative care approach that focuses on noncurative aspects of care should always be considered in the ICU. Research shows that neurosurgical patients in the ICU receive palliative care less frequently than the medical patients in the ICU, which is a missed opportunity for these patients. However, providing appropriate palliative care to neurotrauma patients in an ICU can be difficult, particularly for young adult patients. The patients’ prognoses are often unclear, the likelihood of advance directives is small, and the bereaved families must act as decision-makers. This article highlights the different aspects of the palliative care approach as well as barriers and challenges that accompany the TBI patient population, with a particular focus on young adult patients with TBI and the role of their family members. The article concludes with recommendations for physicians for effective and adequate communication to successfully implement the palliative care approach into standard ICU care and to improve quality of care for patients with TBI and their families.

Does the Probability of Survival Calculated by the Trauma and Injury Severity Score Method Accurately Reflect the Severity of Neurotrauma Patients Admitted to Regional Trauma Centers in Korea?

Assessing and improving the quality of trauma care is crucial in modern trauma systems and centers. In Korea, evaluations of regional trauma centers are conducted annually to assess and improve trauma management quality. This includes using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method to calculate the W-score and mortality Observed-to-Expected ratio (O:E ratio), which are used to evaluate the quality of care. We analyzed the potential for overestimation of the probability of survival using TRISS method for patients with neurotrauma, as well as the potential for errors when evaluating and comparing regional trauma centers. We included patients who visited the regional trauma center between 2019 and 2021 and compared their probability of survival of the TRISS method, W-score, mortality O:E ratio, and misclassification rates. The patient groups were further subdivided into smaller subgroups based on age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Injury Severity Score, and comparisons were made between the neurotrauma and non-neurotrauma groups within each subgroup. A total of 4,045 patients were enrolled in the study, with 1,639 of them having neurotrauma. The neurotrauma patient group had a W-score of -0.68 and a mortality O:E ratio of 1.044. The misclassification rate was found to be 13.3%, and patients with a GCS of 8 or less had a higher misclassification rate of 37.4%. The limitations of using the TRISS method for predicting outcomes in patients with severe neurotrauma are exposed in this study. The TRISS methodology demonstrated a high misclassification rate of approximately 40% in subgroups of patients with GCS less than 9, indicating that it may be less reliable in predicting outcomes for severely injured patients with low GCS. Clinicians and researchers should be cautious when using the TRISS method and consider alternative methods to evaluate patient outcomes and compare the quality of care provided by different trauma centers.

Trends in Neurotrauma Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Kigali, Rwanda.

National regulations to curb the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission and health care resource reallocation may have impacted incidence and treatment for neurotrauma, including traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal trauma, but these trends have not been characterized in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study analyzes differences in epidemiology, management, and outcomes preceding and during the COVID-19 pandemic for neurotrauma patients in a Rwandan tertiary hospital. The study setting was the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK), Rwanda's national referral hospital. Adult injury patients presenting to the CHUK Emergency Department (ED) were prospectively enrolled from January 27, 2020 to June 28, 2020. Study personnel collected data on demographics, injury characteristics, serial neurological examinations, treatment, and outcomes. Differences in patients before (January 27, 2020 to March 21, 2020) and during (June 1, 2020 to June 28, 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic were assessed using chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests. The study population included 216 patients with neurotrauma (83.8% TBI, 8.3% spine trauma, and 7.9% with both). Mean age was 34.1 years (standard deviation [SD] = 12.5) and 77.8% were male. Patients predominantly experienced injury following a road traffic accident (RTA; 65.7%). Weekly volume for TBI (mean = 16.5 vs. 17.1, p = 0.819) and spine trauma (mean = 2.0 vs. 3.4, p = 0.086) was similar between study periods. During the pandemic, patients had lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (mean = 13.8 vs. 14.3, p = 0.068) and Kampala Trauma Scores (KTS; mean = 14.0 vs. 14.3, p = 0.097) on arrival, denoting higher injury severity, but these differences only approached significance. Patients treated during the pandemic period had higher occurrence of hemorrhage, contusion, or fracture on computed tomography (CT) imaging (47.1% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.003) and neurological decline (18.6% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.016). Hospitalizations also increased significantly during COVID-19 (54.6% vs. 39.9%, p = 0.048). Craniotomy rates doubled during the pandemic period (25.7% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.003), but mortality was unchanged (5.5% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.944). Neurotrauma volume remained unchanged at CHUK during the COVID-19 pandemic, but presenting patients had higher injury acuity and craniotomy rates. These findings may inform care during pandemic conditions in Rwanda and similar settings.

'Burr holes in the bush': Clinician preparedness for undertaking emergency intracranial haematoma evacuation surgery in rural and regional Queensland.

Delayed inter-hospital transfers of deteriorating neurotrauma patients from rural and regional hospitals to tertiary centres have seen the need for non-neurosurgeons to undertake emergency intracranial haematoma evacuation surgery locally. In the present study, the authors contributed to the paucity in the literature regarding the widespread availability of cranial access equipment in non-tertiary centres and patient outcomes in Queensland. We surveyed delegates (senior theatre nurses or surgical service directors) from rural and regional Queensland hospitals if they were located outside the local catchment of a tertiary centre and had a CT scanner. Questions regarded availability, location and storage conditions of mechanical cranial access kits, as well as last usage, and associated patient outcomes. Twenty-six delegates from eligible hospitals responded. Eighteen hospitals offered surgical services. Eleven hospitals housed complete mechanical cranial access kits. Five hospitals housed incomplete kits. Thirteen hospitals housed their equipment sterile in the operating theatre or ED. Eleven hospitals reported using the equipment, with last usage ranging from 4months to over 30 years. Two hospitals reported using the equipment within 12 months while a further five reported using it within 10 years. Two hospitals reported 'good' outcomes, two 'ok' and one 'poor'. The availability of cranial access equipment outside Queensland tertiary centres has been limited. Inter-hospital transfers are likely to persist in Queensland and haematoma evacuation surgery has been a life-saving endeavour, so improving access to cranial access equipment in hospitals where it is currently lacking is highly warranted.

Dynamics in the Neurotrauma Catchment Area of a German University Hospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objective: At the beginning of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic enforced a rapid reallocation of healthcare resources. Our neurosurgical department is located in the German county of Marburg–Biedenkopf, about 80 km from the nearest major city. We were able to maintain our previously established open-door policy after the emergence of COVID-19. Here, we report on dynamics in the catchment area for neurotrauma patients at our department during the pandemic. Methods: 763 consecutive neurotrauma cases admitted to our department between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients’ age, gender, origin, diagnoses, and outcomes were recorded. The number of patients hospitalized with a COVID-19 infection in Germany (PHCG) were retrieved from the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). We defined calendar weeks with >1000 PHCG as high COVID-19 caseload weeks (HCLW). Chi-square and Fisher’s exact served as statistical tests. Results: In 2020 and 2021, we observed a significantly increased number of neurotrauma patients who, with primary residence outside of our district, were admitted to our hospital compared to 2018 and 2019 (p < 0.001), while there were no significant differences in in-house mortality. During HCLW, a significantly increased number of neurotrauma patients with primary residence in the densely populated southwestern margin (SWM) of the contiguous part of our catchment area were referred to us compared to the time prior to the pandemic and between HCLW (p = 0.003). In neurotrauma patients admitted from the SWM during HCLW, there was no tendency towards higher in-house mortality. Conclusion: An open-door policy may moderate the risk of involuntarily triaging neurotrauma patients during a pandemic.

Use of the 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index to Predict Hospital-Acquired Infections and Length of Stay Among Neurotrauma Patients Undergoing Emergent Craniotomy/Craniectomy

Traumatic brain injury is a significant public health concern often complicated by hospital-acquired infections (HAIs); however, previous evaluations of factors predictive of risk for HAI have generally been single-center analyses or limited to surgical site infections. Frailty assessment has been shown to provide effective risk stratification in neurosurgery. We evaluated whether frailty status or age is more predictive of HAIs and length of stay among neurotrauma patients requiring craniectomy/craniotomy. In this cross-sectional analysis, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2015-2019 dataset was queried to identify neurotrauma patients who underwent craniectomies/craniotomies. The effects of frailty status (using the 5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5]) and age on occurrence of HAIs and other 30-day adverse events were compared using univariate analysis. The discriminative ability of each measure was defined by multivariate modeling. Of 3284 patients identified, 1172 (35.7%) contracted an HAI postoperatively. Increasing frailty score predicted increased HAI risk (odds ratio [OR]= 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 1.05-1.77, P= 0.022 for mFI-5=1 and OR= 2.01, 95% CI= 1.30-3.11, P= 0.002 for mFI-5≥3), whereas increasing age did not (OR= 0.996, 95% CI= 0.989-1.002, P= 0.009). Median length of stay was significantly longer in patients with HAI (16days [IQR= 9-23]) versus no HAI (7days [IQR= 4-13]) (P < 0.001). Median daily costs on the ward and neuro-intensive care unit were higher with HAI than with no HAI (neuro-ICU: $111,818.08 [IQR= 46,418.05-189,947.34] vs. $48,920.41 [IQR= 20,185.20-107,712.54], P < 0.001). Increasing mFI-5 correlated with increased HAI risk. Neurotrauma patients who developed an HAI after craniectomy/craniotomy had longer hospitalizations and higher care costs. Frailty scoring improves risk stratification among these patients and may assist in reducing total hospital length of stay and total accrued costs to patients.

Targeted delivery of acrolein scavenger hydralazine in spinal cord injury using folate-linker-drug conjugation

Oxidative stress has been shown to play a critical pathogenic role in functional loss after spinal cord injury (SCI). As a direct result of oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation-derived aldehydes have emerged as key culprits that sustain secondary injury and contribute significantly to pathological outcomes. Acrolein, a neurotoxin, has been shown to be elevated in SCI and can result in post-SCI neurological deficits. Reducing acrolein has therefore emerged as a novel and effective therapeutic strategy in SCI. Previous studies have revealed that hydralazine, an FDA approved blood pressure lowering medication, when administered after SCI shows strong acrolein scavenging capabilities and significantly improves cellular and behavioral outcomes. However, while effective at scavenging acrolein, hydralazine's blood pressure lowering activity can have a detrimental impact on neurotrauma patients. Here, our goal was to preserve the acrolein scavenging capability while mitigating the effect of hydralazine on blood pressure. We accomplished this using a folate-targeted delivery system to deploy hydralazine to the folate receptor positive inflammatory site of the cord injury. Using a model of rat SCI, we found that this system is effective for targeting the injury site, and that folate targeted hydralazine can scavenge acrolein without significantly impacting blood pressure.

Neurotrauma in the Syrian War: analysis of 41,143 cases from July 2013-July 2015.

Despite nearly a decade of conflict, little is known about trauma and injuries resulting from the Syrian war. Secondary analysis was conducted of an administrative dataset of patient presentations to a network of 95 war-affected hospitals in Syria from July 2013-July 2015. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with mortality of neurotrauma patients. Of 193,618 overall trauma presentations, 41,143 were for neurotrauma (37,410 head trauma, 1407 spinal trauma, and 3133 peripheral nervous system). There were 31,359 males (76.2%) and 9784 females (23.8%). Males aged 19-30years (10,113; 24.6%) were the largest single demographic group. Presumed non-combatants including females, elders, and children under 13years (16,214; 39.4%) were the largest group of patients overall. There were 16,881 (41.0%) presentations with blunt injuries (blunt/crush injuries) and 21,307 (51.8%) patients with penetrating injuries (shrapnel, cut, gunshot). A total of 36,589 patients (89.6%) were treated and discharged from the hospital, 2100 (5.1%) were transferred to another facility, 2050 patients (5.0%) died in-hospital, 26 remained in the hospital (0.1%), and 108 (0.3%) had unknown disposition. The median length of hospital stay was 1day. There were 4034 (9.7%) neurosurgical procedures documented. Patients with combined neurotrauma and general trauma suffered 30 times higher mortality than neurotrauma alone (aOR: 30.4; 95% CI: 20.8-44.2, p < 0.0001). The Syrian War resulted in large volumes of neurotrauma patients. Presumed non-combatants comprised 39.4% of patients who survived to treatment at a facility. Further study is needed on long-term needs of neurotrauma victims of the Syrian war.

An Assessment of Global Neurotrauma Prevention and Care Delivery: The Provider Perspective

Neurotrauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Assessment of injury prevention and prehospital care for neurotrauma patients is necessary to improve care systems. A 29-question electronic survey was developed based on the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) checklist to assess neurotrauma policies and laws related to safety precautions. The survey was distributed to members of World Health Organization regions that were considered to be experienced medical authorities in neurosurgery and traumatic brain injury. There were 82 (39%) responses representing 46 countries. Almost all respondents (95.2%) were within the neurosurgical field. Of respondents, 40.2% were from high-income countries (HICs), and 59.8% were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Motor vehicle accidents were reported as the leading cause of neurotrauma, followed by workplace injury and assault. Of respondents, 84.1% reported having a helmet law in their country. HICs (4.38 ± 0.78) were ranked more likely than LMICs (2.88 ± 1.34; P= 0.0001) to enforce helmet laws on a scale of 1-10. Effectiveness of helmet laws was rated as 3.94 ± 0.95 out of 10. Measures regarding prehospital care varied between HICs and LMICs. Patients in HICs were more likely to use public emergency ambulance transportation (81.8% vs. 42.9%; P= 0.0004). All prehospital personnel having emergency training was also reported to be more likely in HICs than LMICs (60.6% vs. 8.7%; P= 0.0001). When injuries occur, timely access to neurosurgical care is critical. A focus on prehospital components of the trauma system is paramount, and policymakers can use the information presented here to implement and refine health care systems to ensure safe, timely, affordable, and equitable access to neurotrauma care.

Is neurotrauma training in rural New South Wales still required following the implementation of the New South Wales State Trauma Plan?

In New South Wales (NSW), Australia, trauma accounts for 6% of deaths. Trauma patients receiving definitive care in regional trauma centres are 34% more likely to have a fatal outcome compared to level 1 centres. Following the implementation of the NSW State Trauma Plan where patients with major trauma are fast tracked to regional trauma services, should NSW rural surgeons and retrieval doctors continue to receive surgical training in neurotrauma? The study's primary objective was to ascertain which NSW regional and rural hospitals have the equipment to perform neurotrauma and when it was last used. The study also examined the outcome of those patients who had undergone an emergency neurosurgical procedure. Of the 149 regional and rural hospitals in NSW, 16 stored a Hudson brace, perforator, burr and Gigli saw sterile and ready to use in the operating theatre. Only one hospital utilised the equipment in the last year and 11 in the last 10 years. Of those patients who had undergone an emergency neurosurgical procedure, two patients died prior to transfer and three were confirmed deceased after transfer to a tertiary centre. The implementation of the NSW State Trauma Plan has streamlined the trauma triage process and transport of neurotrauma patients to regional and major trauma services. However, it is likely that knowledge of how to perform burr hole and craniectomy for the evacuation of extradural haematoma remains a useful skill for the rural surgeon and retrieval doctor if transport is delayed.

Should Rib Fracture Patients be Treated at High Acuity Trauma Hospitals?

It is well known that severely injured trauma patients have better outcomes when treated at centers that routinely treat high acuity trauma. The benefits of specialty treatment for chest trauma have not been shown. We hypothesized that patients with high risk rib fractures treated in centers that care for high acuity trauma would have better outcomes than patients treated in other centers. All rib fracture patients were identified via the 2016 National Inpatient Sample using ICD-10 codes; Abbreviated Injury Scales (AIS) and Elixhauser comorbidity scores were also extracted. Chest AIS was grouped as mild (≤ 1) or severe (≥ 2). All patients with AIS > 2 in another body region were excluded. High acuity trauma hospitals (TH) were defined as hospitals which transferred 0% of neurotrauma patients; all other hospitals were defined as non-trauma hospitals. Poor outcome was defined as any patient who died, had a tracheostomy, developed pneumonia, or had a length of stay in the longest decile. Logistic regression with an interaction term for hospital type and chest trauma severity was performed. A total of 29,780 patients with rib fractures were identified (median age 64 (IQR 51-79), 60% male), of whom 22% had poor outcomes. Fifty-three percent of patients were treated at non-trauma hospitals. In unadjusted comparisons, poor outcomes occurred more often at TH (22.4% versus 21.4%, P=0.03). However, after adjustment, severe chest trauma that was treated at non-trauma hospitals was associated with higher odds of poor outcomes (OR 1.6, < 0.001). More than 20% of patients with severe chest trauma have a poor outcome. Severe chest trauma outcomes are improved at TH. Development of transfer criteria for chest injuries in high-risk patients may mitigate poor outcomes at hospitals without specialized trauma expertise.

Algorithm of traumatic brain injury management at Indonesia in the COVID 19 pandemic ERA. Retrospective cohort study

ObjectivesCOVID-19, a global pandemic, affects neurosurgical care in Indonesia. This study has objective to propose guideline and algorithm recommendation for the management of TBI patients during this pandemic, which can be used flexibly at neurosurgery centers, both in Indonesia and throughout the world. MethodsWe performed retrospective Cohort analysis from TBI database at tertiary public general hospitals. All neurotrauma cases from mid-February until mid-August 2020 was included in this study. The chronology of COVID-19 pandemics impact in Indonesia was defined by early period from mid-February until end of May 2020, and late period are latter. All subjects undergone the screening and perioperative measures that based on our proposes scoring system and algorithm as follows. ResultsThere are many guidelines that explain screening methods in neurosurgery patients in general, as well as neurotrauma in particular. But here, we proposed our own scoring and screening algorithm that has been developed based on conditions in Indonesia. In total of 757 neurotrauma cases data were collected from the pandemic starts in Indonesia. DiscussionScreening is a crucial initial step in this pandemic period, not only for COVID patients, but also all patients who enter the emergency room. The use of PPE is a necessity in several neurosurgery centers, especially with high COVID-19 case rates. ConclusionThe management of neurotrauma patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 requires special attention, starting from admission of the patient in ER. Rapid scoring and screening are important and the highest level of PPE is mandatory during patient care.

"Locked up inside home" - Head injury patterns during coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic.

Background: As citizens have been forced to stay home during coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the crisis created unique trends in the neurotrauma patterns with changes in mode, severity, and outcome of head injured patients.Methods: Details of neurotrauma admissions under the neurosurgery department at our institute since the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in the country were collected retrospectively and compared to the same period last year in terms of demographic profile, mode of injury, GCS at admission, severity of head injury, radiological diagnosis, management (surgical/conservative), and outcome. The patients were studied according to which phase of pandemic they were admitted in – “lockdown” period (March 25 to May 31, 2020) or “unlock” period (June 1 to September 15, 2020).Results: The number of head injuries decreased by 16.8% during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, during the lockdown period, the number of admissions was 2.7/week while it was 6.8/week during the “unlock” period. RTA was the mode of injury in 29.6% patients during the lockdown, while during the unlock period, it was 56.9% (P = 0.000). Mild and moderate head injuries decreased by 41% and severe head injuries increased by 156.25% during the COVID-19 pandemic (P = 0.000). The mortality among neurotrauma patients increased from 12.4% to 22.5% during the COVID-19 era (P = 0.009).Conclusion: We observed a decline in the number of head injury admissions during the pandemic, especially during the lockdown. At the same time, there was increase in the severity of head injuries and associated injuries, resulting in significantly higher mortality in our patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Subclinical Hypoxemia in COVID-19 Patients: Physiological Rationale and Management in Neurotrauma Patients

Subclinical Hypoxemia in COVID-19 Patients: Physiological Rationale and Management in Neurotrauma Patients