Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Research Articles

Cannabinoids for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review.

Cannabinoids have emerged as a potential treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This systematic review aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids to treat OSA. Databases including Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched; experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. One-hundred seventy unique records were screened, and nine studies included: five full-text studies and four published abstracts. The five full-text studies were judged for quality appraisal: two studies deemed at low risk for bias, one study deemed to have some concerns for bias, and two studies deemed to have high risk for bias. Seven of nine total studies were experimental designs and evaluated dronabinol, and the other two studies were observational designs evaluating cannabis. The range of cannabinoid therapy duration spanned from 1 to 6 weeks, and the median duration was 3 weeks. Eight of nine total studies reported statistically significant, positive OSA outcomes due to cannabinoid therapy including reductions in the apnea hypopnea index and improvements in patient-reported daytime sleepiness scales. Between 70% and 80% of study participants reported neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal adverse events attributable to cannabinoids. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine does not recommend using cannabinoids to treat OSA due to a lack of long-term safety and efficacy data. This systematic review found similar limitations, with the median cannabinoid treatment duration being only 3 weeks. Adequately powered experimental trials over longer time frames are necessary to more completely assess the long-term efficacy and safety of cannabinoids in the treatment of OSA and its effects on common comorbid conditions, such as obesity and cardiovascular disease.

Neuropsychiatric adverse events in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate- and tenofovir alafenamide-based HIV therapy and prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tenofovir is integral to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV, but its neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs) have not been systematically investigated. This systematic review aims to characterize common NPAEs during tenofovir-based ART and PrEP and to assess tenofovir's specific role in their emergence. Four literature databases and three trial registries were searched up to December 31, 2023, for randomized controlled trials reporting NPAEs in treatment-naïve adults receiving tenofovir-based ART or PrEP. Meta-analyses compared tenofovir (with/without emtricitabine) to placebo and tenofovir alafenamide- to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimens. Sixty-nine trials (62 on ART, 7 on PrEP) with 29 340 patients on tenofovir-based therapies revealed headache, dizziness, insomnia, and depression as common NPAEs, especially in HIV studies. Meta-analyses of tenofovir (with/without emtricitabine) versus placebo only indicated an increased risk of dizziness (OR 1.32; CI 1.09-1.59; P = 0.004). Comparisons between tenofovir alafenamide and disoproxil fumarate did not reveal significant differences in NPAE risks, although sensitivity analyses suggested a higher risk of headache with tenofovir alafenamide in HIV studies (OR 1.24; CI 1.01-1.52; P = 0.04). Common NPAEs in tenofovir-based HIV multi-drug regimens highlight the need to screen HIV patients for neuropsychiatric complications. The lack of effect of tenofovir compared to placebo for most analyzable NPAEs suggests that tenofovir itself is mostly safe regarding NPAEs. However, a possible increase in dizziness risk with tenofovir, and a potential rise in headache risk with tenofovir alafenamide- compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimens in HIV therapy, merit further investigation.

Comparative Risk of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Associated With Leukotriene-Receptor Antagonists Versus Inhaled Corticosteroids

Leukotriene-receptor antagonists (LTRA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are common controller medications for asthma, but limited studies examine their comparative risks on neuropsychiatric adverse events (NAEs) in asthma patients. To investigate the comparative risks of LTRA versus ICS on seven distinct categories of NAEs in asthma patients at a nationwide level. We conducted a nationwide cohort study during 2010-2021. Incident NAEs and its clinical subgroups (e.g., psychotic disorders, anxiety disorders, movement disorders, behavioral and emotional disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders) were assessed. Cox proportional hazards regressions were employed to quantify the comparative risks. There were 1,249,897 asthma patients aged 6-64 years. Incidence rates for NAEs were 25.10 per 1000 person-years among patients treated with LTRA, and 23.46 per 1000 person-years among those treated with ICS. The incidence rate difference was 1.64 [95%CI: 0.30-2.98] per 1000 person-years. Positive associations of NAEs and three clinical subgroups were found in patients treated with LTRA compared to ICS (hazard ratios (HR): 1.06 [95%CI: 1.00-1.12] for NAEs; HR: 1.88 [95%CI: 1.24-2.84] for psychotic disorders; HR: 1.10 [95%CI: 1.01-1.20] for anxiety disorders; and HR: 1.27 [95%CI: 1.02-1.58] for behavioral and emotional disorders), but not for movement disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders. This nationwide cohort study identified heightened risks, ranging from 6% to 88%, of NAEs and three clinical subgroups in asthma patients treated with LTRA compared to ICS. These findings underscore the necessity for clinicians to communicate with patients regarding potential neuropsychiatric harms when prescribing LTRA.

Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events with Monoclonal Antibodies Approved for Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Background/Objectives: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. However, post-marketing data on their neuropsychiatric safety are limited. This study aimed to evaluate neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs) related to mAbs used for MM through a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from 2015 to 2023 with at least one neuropsychiatric AE and one of the MM-approved mAbs as the suspected drug (i.e., daratumumab, elotuzumab, isatuximab, belantamab mafodotin, teclistamab, elranatamab, and talquentamab) were analyzed using descriptive and disproportionality approaches. Results: Unknown signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR) included the following: cerebral infarction for daratumumab (n = 45; reporting odds ratio (ROR) = 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.79-3.21; information component (IC) = 1.54, IC025-IC075 = 1.05-1.9), elotuzumab (25; 7.61, 5.13-11.28; 3.03, 2.37-3.51), and isatuximab (10; 2.56, 1.38-4.76; 1.67, 0.59-2.4); mental status changes for daratumumab (40; 2.66, 1.95-3.63; 1.67, 1.14-2.04) and belantamab mafodotin (10; 4.23, 2.28-7.88; 2.3, 1.22-3.03); an altered state of consciousness for daratumumab (32; 1.97, 1.39-2.78; 1.32, 0.73-1.74) and belantamab mafodotin (6; 2.35, 1.05-5.23; 1.6, 0.19-2.52); Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) for daratumumab (23; 6.42, 4.26-9.69; 2.81, 2.11-3.3), isatuximab (8; 10.72, 5.35-21.48; 3.57, 2.35-4.37), and elotuzumab (3; 4.74, 1.53-14.7; 2.59, 0.52-3.8); and orthostatic intolerance for daratumumab (10; 12.54, 6.71-23.43; 3.75, 2.67-4.48) and elotuzumab (4; 28.31, 10.58-75.73; 5, 3.24-6.08). Conclusions: Our analysis highlighted several previously unacknowledged SDRs for MM-approved mAbs. Given the complex and not entirely understood etiology of some neuropsychiatric AEs, including GBS, further investigations are necessary.

Risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events associated with montelukast use in children and adolescents: a population-based case-crossover study

PurposeMontelukast is used extensively in children and adolescents for allergic rhinitis and asthma. However, concerns have been raised regarding the increased risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs) associated with montelukast...

A comprehensive assessment of the association between common drugs and psychiatric disorders using Mendelian randomization and real-world pharmacovigilance database

Medications prescribed for chronic diseases can lead to short-term neuropsychiatric symptoms, but their long-term effects on brain structures and psychiatric conditions remain unclear. We comprehensively analyzed the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database and conducted drug target Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies on six categories of common drugs, 477 brain imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) and eight psychiatric disorders. Genetic instruments were extracted from expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) in blood, brain, and other target tissues, protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) in blood, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of hemoglobin and cholesterol. Summary statistics for brain IDPs, psychiatric disorders, and gut microbiome were obtained from the BIG40, Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, and MiBioGen. A two-step MR and mediation analysis were employed to screen possible mediators of drug-IDP effects from 119 gut microbiota genera and identify their mediation proportions. Among 19 drug classes, six drugs were found to be associated with higher risks of psychiatric adverse events, while 11 drugs were associated with higher risks of gastrointestinal adverse events in the FAERS analysis. We identified ten drug-psychiatric disorder associations, 202 drug-IDP associations, 16 drug-microbiota associations, and four drug-microbiota-IDP causal links. For example, PPARG activation mediated HbA1c reduction caused a higher risk of bipolar disorder (BD) II. Genetically proxied GLP-1R agonists were significantly associated with an increase in the volume of the CA3-head of the right hippocampus and the area of the left precuneus cortex, both of which have been shown to correlate with cognition in previous studies. Common drugs may affect brain structure and risk of psychiatric disorder. Oral medications in particular may exert some of these effects by influencing gut microbiota. This study calls for greater attention to be paid to the neuropsychiatric adverse effects of drugs and encourages drug repurposing. National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 82330035, 82130043, 82172685, and 82001223), National Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (grant No. 2021SK1010), and the Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Changsha (grant No. kq2209006).

Antiretroviral drug dolutegravir induces inflammation at the mouse brain barriers.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is currently used as first-line regimen to treat HIV infection. Despite its high efficacy and barrier to resistance, ART-associated neuropsychiatric adverse effects remain a major concern. Recent studies have identified a potential interaction between the INSTI, dolutegravir (DTG), and folate transport pathways at the placental barrier. We hypothesized that such interactions could also occur at the two major blood-brain interfaces: blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) and blood-brain barrier (BBB). To address this question, we evaluated the effect of two INSTIs, DTG and bictegravir (BTG), on folate transporters and receptor expression at the mouse BCSFB and the BBB invitro, exvivo and invivo. We demonstrated that DTG but not BTG significantly downregulated the mRNA and/or protein expression of folate transporters (RFC/SLC19A1, PCFT/SLC46A1) in human and mouse BBB models invitro, and mouse brain capillaries exvivo. Our invivo study further revealed a significant downregulation in Slc19a1 and Slc46a1 mRNA expression at the BCSFB and the BBB following a 14-day DTG oral treatment in C57BL/6 mice. However, despite the observed downregulatory effect of DTG in folate transporters/receptor at both brain barriers, a 14-day oral treatment of DTG-based ART did not significantly alter the brain folate level in animals. Interestingly, DTG treatment robustly elevated the mRNA and/or protein expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Cxcl3, Il6, Il23, Il12) in primary cultures of mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells (BBB). DTG oral treatment also significantly upregulated proinflammatory cytokines and chemokine (Il6, Il1β, Tnfα, Ccl2) at the BCSFB in mice. We additionally observed a downregulated mRNA expression of drug efflux transporters (Abcc1, Abcc4, and Abcb1a) and tight junction protein (Cldn3) at the CP isolated from mice treated with DTG. Despite the structural similarities, BTG only elicited minor effects on the markers of interest at both the BBB and BCSFB. In summary, our current data demonstrates that DTG but not BTG strongly induced inflammatory responses in a rodent BBB and BCSFB model. Together, these data provide valuable insights into the mechanism of DTG-induced brain toxicity, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of DTG-associated neuropsychiatric adverse effect.

Reversibility of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events after Switching to Darunavir/Cobicistat or Doravirine in Men on INSTI-Based Regimen.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) are associated with neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). The aim of this study was to evaluate improvements in NPAEs after switching an INSTI-based regimen to darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) or doravirine (DOR). Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the reversibility of NPAEs via the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and D) in patients who started antiretroviral therapy with dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC). These patients were switched to DRV/c or DOR. Scales were compared at the moment of the switch and 12 weeks later. Results: We included 1153 treatment-naïve men, 676 (58.7%) with BIC and 477 (41.3%) with DTG. A total of 32 (2.7%) experienced NPAEs that led to discontinuation. Insomnia was found in 20 patients; depression via PHQ-9 in 21 patients, via HADS-D in 5 patients, and anxiety via HADS-A in 12 patients. All of them were evaluated by a psychiatrist at the moment of the symptoms; 7 (21.8%) started psychotropic drugs. After 12 weeks of follow-up, PHQ-9, ISI, HADS-A, and HADS-D decreased, with a p-value ≤ 0.05. Conclusions: NPAEs seem to improve after switching to a DRV/c- or DOR-based regimen after the first 4 and 12 weeks.

Effets indésirables de l’association tezacaftor/ivacaftor/elexacaftor pouvant mener à un arrêt de traitement : à propos d’une série de 10 cas

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) channel modulators (ivacaftor, lumacaftor, tezacaftor and elexacaftor) represent a major advance in the management of cystic fibrosis. However, few data are available on the real-life safety profile of these medications, in particular on adverse events that may lead to their discontinuation. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics and evolution of adverse reactions to the tezacaftor/ivacaftor/elexacaftor combination that led to discontinuation and were reported to the Centre régional de pharmacovigilance (CRPV) in Rennes (France). A retrospective study was conducted from December 2021 to May 2023, focusing on cases of discontinuation of the tezacaftor/ivacaftor/elexacaftor combination due to the occurrence of one or more adverse effects, and reported to the CRPV of Rennes, France. Ten cases of drug discontinuation were reported to the Rennes CRPV (6 women/4 men). Adverse effects mainly involved neuropsychiatric disorders (n=6), followed by liver disorders (n=2), ear, nose and throat disorders (n=1), and digestive disorders (n=1). The average duration of treatment at discontinuation was 339.8 [39-668] days. The drug was reintroduced in 7 patients on average 48.7 [7-123] days after discontinuation, with a dosage adjustments (n=4) consisting of changes in dosing times or a reduction in daily doses, with varying success in alleviating adverse symptoms depending on the case. This small case series suggests that neuropsychiatric adverse effects may occur more frequently than initially described after initiation of tezacaftor/ivacaftor/elexacaftor, and should be carefully screened and monitored. Dosage or administration schedule modifications may be considered for patients experiencing these adverse effects. Further pharmacovigilance studies are needed to better understand the adverse effect profiles of "caftors", their possible risk factors, and the impact of adjusting dosing modalities.

Leukotriene receptor antagonists as add-on therapy to antihistamines for urticaria: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BackgroundThe benefits and harms of adding antileukotrienes to H1-antihistamines for the management of urticaria (hives, itch, and/or angioedema) remain unclear. ObjectiveWe sought to systematically synthesize the treatment outcomes of antileukotrienes in combination with H1-antihistamines versus H1-antihistamines alone for acute and chronic urticaria. MethodsAs part of updating American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters urticaria guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, LILACS, WPRIM, IBECS, ICTRP, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, FDA, and EMA databases from inception to December 18th, 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating antileukotrienes and H1-antihistamines versus H1-antihistamines alone in patients with urticaria. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random effects models pooled effect estimates for urticaria activity, itch, wheal, sleep, quality of life, and harms. The GRADE approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. Open Science Framework registration: https://osf.io/h2bfx/. ResultsThirty-four RCTs enrolled 3,324 children and adults. Compared to H1-antihistamines alone, the combination of a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) with H1-antihistamines probably modestly reduces urticaria activity (mean difference: -5.04, 95%CI -6.36 to -3.71; 7-day Urticaria Activity Score) with moderate certainty. We made similar findings for itch and wheal severity, and quality of life. Adverse events were probably not different between groups (moderate certainty), however, no RCT reported on neuropsychiatric adverse events. ConclusionAmong patients with urticaria, adding LTRAs to H1-antihistamines probably modestly improves urticaria activity with little to no increase in overall adverse events. The added risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events in this population with LTRAs is small and uncertain.

Assessing the Incidence Rate of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects in Older Adults Following Levetiracetam Initiation: A Retrospective Study.

Levetiracetam (LEV) is commonly prescribed for epilepsy management. However, neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are concerning adverse effects that may result in medication discontinuation. This study aims to examine the incidence and factors influencing LEV associated NPDs in adult patients aged 50 years and above. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 50 years and above prescribed LEV between 2010 and 2020, with at least one follow-up appointment six months post-treatment initiation. The incidence of new-onset or aggravated NPDs and variables potentially influencing this risk were examined. Independent t-test, chi-squared, and Fisher's exact test were used, in addition to univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The study included 100 patients with a mean age at LEV start of 63.31 years (SD = 16.48). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were observed in 6 (6.0%) patients. Factors associated with new-onset NPDs were younger age at epilepsy diagnosis (p=0.005), younger age at LEV start (p=0.004), and concurrent use of Carbamazepine/Oxcarbazepine (p=0.004). On multivariate analysis, only the association with Carbamazepine/Oxcarbazepine remained significant (OR 14.62, 95% CI 1.86-114.70, p=0.011). The findings indicate that the incidence of NPDs in elderly patients is relatively low (6%). Further research with larger samples is needed in comparison with a younger sample as a control group to confirm these findings.

Efficacy of a single low dose of esketamine after childbirth for mothers with symptoms of prenatal depression: randomised clinical trial

ObjectiveTo determine whether a single low dose of esketamine administered after childbirth reduces postpartum depression in mothers with prenatal depression.DesignRandomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial with two parallel arms.SettingFive tertiary...

Unraveling a Psychiatric Puzzle: Corticosteroid-Induced Psychosis in Addison’s Disease. A case report

IntroductionThe spectrum of neuropsychiatric adverse effects of corticosteroids ranges from unspecific symptoms to structured psychotic or affective episodes. We present the case of a 30-year-old woman admitted to our hospital due to behavioral alterations, coinciding with the initiation of treatment with corticosteroid boluses as part of a chemotherapy regimen for gastric adenocarcinoma. She had a previous diagnose of Addison’s disease, undergoing treatment with supplemental corticosteroids.Objectives1)To describe the clinical particularities of this case, focusing on the psychopathological aspects and their correlation with the corticoid treatment.2)To review the available literature regarding the clinical characteristics and management of corticosteroid-induced psychosis, with special interest in patients with adrenal insufficiency that require long term steroid supplementation.MethodsA review of the patient’s clinical history and complementary tests were carried out. Likewise, we reviewed the available literature in relation to the clinical presentation of corticosteroid-induced psychosis and its pharmacological management.ResultsThe patient was admitted to our hospital due to acute behavioural alterations, which temporally coincided with the 4th cycle of FOLFOX chemotherapy and corticosteroid boluses. She presented with incoherent speech, with non sequitur answers and glossolalia, as well as dysphoric affect and purposeless behavior. She presented a favorable clinical course after the initiation of treatment with antipsychotics and temporary suspension of corticosteroid treatment.Manic symptoms are the most common presentation of “corticosteroid-induced psychosis”, with the key characteristic being the temporal association with the corticosteroids administration. Although the discontinuation of steroids generally results in a sudden decrease in symptoms, additional treatment with antipsychotics such as haloperidol or olanzapine might be required for a symptomatic control. In patients with adrenal insufficiency, long-term treatment with lithium or anti-seizure treatments are effective strategies in relapse prevention when a higer steroid dose is required.Conclusions-Corticosteroid-induced psychosis is a well described clinical phenomenon, that usually presents with manic symptoms rather than psychotic experiences.-Progressive discontinuation of corticosteroid treatment usually results in complete cessation of symptoms, but additional psychopharmacological treatment might be required, especially in patients with adrenal insufficiency undergoing long-term corticosteroid treatment.-This case outlines the psychopathological richness in the presentation of corticosteroid-induced psychosis, and illustrates the challenges in the pharmacological management in patients with adrenal insufficiency.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

The Use of Neuraminidase Inhibitors in Teenagers May Not Increase the Risk of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events: A Nationwide Population-based Retrospective Study

Background: Pandemic influenza virus is a public health issue, and the neuraminidase inhibitors (NIs) “Oseltamivir” and “Zanamivir” are effective treatments. While teenagers use NIs, there are concerns regarding neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). Aim: We aimed to use the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to identify the correlation between NPAEs and NIs use in teenagers aged 13–19 years. Methods: The final population between 2000 and 2015 included in this study was 3698 individuals, with 2287 individuals having received “Oseltamivir” and “Zanamivir” (study cohort group) and 9148 individuals not receiving “Oseltamivir” and “Zanamivir” (comparison cohort group). We initially used a multivariate Cox regression analysis during the tracking period to determine the cumulative incidence of NPAEs. Results: Our findings revealed no significant increase in the likelihood of developing NPAEs in the study group. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve demonstrated that individuals who received “Oseltamivir” and “Zanamivir” were not associated with statistically significantly increased NPAEs compared with controls (log-rank test, P = 0.724). Conclusion: No more risk in comparison of the normal population in our study, and the safety of “Oseltamivir” and “Zanamivir” is established treatments for influenza.

Neuropsychiatric effects of glucocorticoids

Neuropsychiatric effects of glucocorticoids

A Bayesian approach for investigating the pharmacogenetics of combination antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV.

Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) with at least three different drugs has become the standard of care for people with HIV (PWH) due to its exceptional effectiveness in viral suppression. However, many ART drugs have been reported to associate with neuropsychiatric adverse effects including depression, especially when certain genetic polymorphisms exist. Pharmacogenetics is an important consideration for administering combination ART as it may influence drug efficacy and increase risk for neuropsychiatric conditions. Large-scale longitudinal HIV databases provide researchers opportunities to investigate the pharmacogenetics of combination ART in a data-driven manner. However, with more than 30 FDA-approved ART drugs, the interplay between the large number of possible ART drug combinations and genetic polymorphisms imposes statistical modeling challenges. We develop a Bayesian approach to examine the longitudinal effects of combination ART and their interactions with genetic polymorphisms on depressive symptoms in PWH. The proposed method utilizes a Gaussian process with a composite kernel function to capture the longitudinal combination ART effects by directly incorporating individuals' treatment histories, and a Bayesian classification and regression tree to account for individual heterogeneity. Through both simulation studies and an application to a dataset from the Women's Interagency HIV Study, we demonstrate the clinical utility of the proposed approach in investigating the pharmacogenetics of combination ART and assisting physicians to make effective individualized treatment decisions that can improve health outcomes for PWH.

APOE-ε4 allele[s]-associated adverse events reported from placebo arm in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease: implications for anti-amyloid beta therapy.

APOE-ε4 allele[s] is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA) in anti-amyloid beta therapy, and is also associated with cerebrovascular risk factors such as hyperlipidemia or atherosclerosis. During AD clinical trials, APOE-ε4 carriers may experience neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs) related to these risks, complicating the differentiation of ARIA from cerebrovascular events based on symptoms. This study aimed to examine the hypothetical impact of considering the APOE-ε4 allele's risk for non-ARIA AEs during AD clinical trials. We used data from the Critical Path for Alzheimer's Disease (CPAD) from the placebo arm of randomized controlled trials (RCT) for AD treatment. We determined whether AEs were reported more frequently in APOE-ε4 carriers, quantifying with reporting odds ratio (ROR) using a mixed effect model. We also evaluated the association between ROR levels and the prior probability that an AE is symptomatic ARIA. We analyzed 6,313 patients with AD or mild cognitive impairment in 28 trials. Of the prespecified 35 neuropsychiatric or related AEs, several had a significantly high ROR: "delusion" (ROR = 4.133), "confusional state" (ROR = 1.419), "muscle spasms" (ROR = 9.849), "irritability" (ROR = 12.62), "sleep disorder" (ROR = 2.944), or "convulsion" (ROR = 13.00). However, none remained significant after adjusting for Mini-Mental State Examination scores. There is no strong evidence to suggest that specific neuropsychiatric AEs occur more frequently without drug treatment association among APOE-ε4 carriers. The influence of APOE-ε4 allele[s] on the clinicians' assessment of the likelihood of ARIA during safety monitoring in anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibody treatment might be unchanged, thus maintaining the current level of awareness of clinicians of AEs.

ADR assessment of isoniazid induced psychosis: Case report and review of literature

Tuberculosis ranks among the top 10 causes of death globally and stands as the primary cause attributed to a single infectious agent. Among all antitubercular drugs, Isoniazid is most important role in the management of pulmonary tuberculosis.Various neuropsychiatric adverse effects have been documented in association with the use of isoniazid, both in therapeutic and overdose scenarios. This case report describes a 68-year-old male with multiple health issues, including disseminated tuberculosis, developed drug-induced psychosis, likely due to isoniazid in his anti-tubercular therapy. This case underscores the challenges of psychiatric adverse effects in tuberculosis treatment and emphasizes the importance of prompt recognition and intervention.

Incidence and determinants of adverse events in individuals with HIV commencing Dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy in mainland Tanzania

Tanzania adopted a Dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimen as first-line treatment in 2019 following the World Health Organization recommendation. Data on the DTG safety profile from sub-Saharan Africa including Tanzania are limited. We investigated the incidence of DTG-related adverse events (AEs) and associated factors among people living with HIV (PLHIV) initiated on a DTG regimen. A prospective cohort study was conducted from 25 Care and Treatment Clinics in mainland Tanzania. PLHIV aged 12 years and above who were initiated on a DTG-based regimen were actively followed up for three months. The Cox regression model was used to determine the predictors of occurrence of AEs over time. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. From January 2020 to June 2022, a cohort of 935 participants who were both newly diagnosed and ART-experienced who transitioned to a DTG-based regimen was enrolled. Out of 935 participants, 59 (6.3%) reported a total of 62 AEs. The most frequently experienced AE was skin itching and rashes (15/62; 24.2%). DTG-associated neuropsychiatric AEs were less common and included headache (6 [9.6%]) and sleep disturbances (3 [4.8%]). The overall incidence of occurrence of the first AEs was 96.7 per 1000 person-months [95% C.I: 74.4–125.7] with the highest incidence observed among the elderly (≥ 60 years). Individuals on WHO HIV Clinical Stage 2 had a 2.7 significantly higher risk of developing AEs (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.46–5.12, p = 0.017). We report a low incidence of grade I (mild) and grade II (moderate) DTG-associated AEs suggesting that the regimen is generally safe in the population. Continued monitoring of DTG safety in the population is recommended.

Paranoid psychosis after a single parenteral dose of indomethacin administered for headache diagnosis: A case and review of the literature

Background: Indomethacin is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory used to diagnose and treat hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania. Treatment can be complicated by gastrointestinal adverse effects; less commonly reported are idiosyncratic neuropsychiatric adverse effects with indomethacin. Methods: A 50-year-old male with lateralized brief attacks of headache associated with cranial autonomic symptoms was administered a single 200 mg dose of intramuscular indomethacin. Within an hour, he developed acute psychosis, with paranoid delusions and verbal and physical aggression lasting 5 h, followed by recovery to baseline. We used search terms “indomethacin psychosis,” “indomethacin psychiatric,” “indomethacin side effects,” “non-steroidal anti-inflammatory psychosis,” and “non-steroidal anti-inflammatory psychiatric” within PubMed to identify previous reports and literature in this area. Results: Neuropsychiatric adverse effects of indomethacin have been reported since 1965 in a dose-dependent manner, usually with oral courses. They may be more common in the elderly, postpartum women and postoperative patients. Conclusion: Neuropsychiatric adverse effects should be considered in headache medicine, particularly in at-risk groups when indomethacin is administered. Patients, particularly those at highest risk, should be counseled about the risk of neuropsychiatric side effects on indomethacin which may be dose-dependent and are generally reversible on stopping the drug.