Neuronal G-protein-coupled Receptors Research Articles

Ciliary localization of a light-activated neuronal GPCR shapes behavior

Many neurons in the central nervous system produce a single primary cilium that serves as a specialized signaling organelle. Several neuromodulatory G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) localize to primary cilia in neurons, although it is not understood how GPCR signaling from the cilium impacts circuit function and behavior. We find that the vertebrate ancient long opsin A (VALopA), a Gi-coupled GPCR extraretinal opsin, targets to cilia of zebrafish spinal neurons. In the developing 1-d-old zebrafish, brief light activation of VALopA in neurons of the central pattern generator circuit for locomotion leads to sustained inhibition of coiling, the earliest form of locomotion. We find that a related extraretinal opsin, VALopB, is also Gi-coupled, but is not targeted to cilia. Light-induced activation of VALopB also suppresses coiling, but with faster kinetics. We identify the ciliary targeting domains of VALopA. Retargeting of both opsins shows that the locomotory response is prolonged and amplified when signaling occurs in the cilium. We propose that ciliary localization provides a mechanism for enhancing GPCR signaling in central neurons.

Physiological Condition-Dependent Changes in Ciliary GPCR Localization in the Brain.

Primary cilia are cellular appendages critical for diverse types of Signaling. They are found on most cell types, including cells throughout the CNS. Cilia preferentially localize certain G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and are critical for mediating the signaling of these receptors. Several of these neuronal GPCRs have recognized roles in feeding behavior and energy homeostasis. Cell and model systems, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Chlamydomonas, have implicated both dynamic GPCR cilia localization and cilia length and shape changes as key for signaling. It is unclear whether mammalian ciliary GPCRs use similar mechanisms in vivo and under what conditions these processes may occur. Here, we assess two neuronal cilia GPCRs, melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCHR1) and neuropeptide-Y receptor 2 (NPY2R), as mammalian model ciliary receptors in the mouse brain. We test the hypothesis that dynamic localization to cilia occurs under physiological conditions associated with these GPCR functions. Both receptors are involved in feeding behaviors, and MCHR1 is also associated with sleep and reward. Cilia were analyzed with a computer-assisted approach allowing for unbiased and high-throughput analysis. We measured cilia frequency, length, and receptor occupancy. We observed changes in ciliary length, receptor occupancy, and cilia frequency under different conditions for one receptor but not another and in specific brain regions. These data suggest that dynamic cilia localization of GPCRs depends on properties of individual receptors and cells where they are expressed. A better understanding of subcellular localization dynamics of ciliary GPCRs could reveal unknown molecular mechanisms regulating behaviors like feeding.

P-Rex1 Controls Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Signalling, Morphology, and Cell-Cycle Progression in Neuronal Cells

P-Rex1 is a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) that activates Rac-type small G proteins in response to the stimulation of a range of receptors, particularly G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), to control cytoskeletal dynamics and other Rac-dependent cell responses. P-Rex1 is mainly expressed in leukocytes and neurons. Whereas its roles in leukocytes have been studied extensively, relatively little is known about its functions in neurons. Here, we used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated P-Rex1 deficiency in neuronal PC12 cells that stably overexpress the GPCR S1PR1, a receptor for sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), to investigate the role of P-Rex1 in neuronal GPCR signalling and cell responses. We show that P-Rex1 is required for the S1P-stimulated activation of Rac1 and Akt, basal Rac3 activity, and constitutive cAMP production in PC12-S1PR1 cells. The constitutive cAMP production was not due to increased expression levels of major neuronal adenylyl cyclases, suggesting that P-Rex1 may regulate adenylyl cyclase activity. P-Rex1 was required for maintenance of neurite protrusions and spreading in S1P-stimulated PC12-S1PR1 cells, as well as for cell-cycle progression and proliferation. In summary, we identified novel functional roles of P-Rex1 in neuronal Rac, Akt and cAMP signalling, as well as in neuronal cell-cycle progression and proliferation.

Neuronal Gα subunits required for the control of response to polystyrene nanoparticles in the range of μg/L in C. elegans

The aim of this study was to identify Gα proteins mediating function of neuronal G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in controlling the response to polystyrene nanoparticles (PS-NPs). Caenorhabditis elegans was used as an animal model, and both gene expression and functional analysis were performed to identify the Gα proteins in controlling PS-NPs toxicity. In nematodes, exposure to PS-NPs (1–100 μg/L) significantly altered transcriptional expressions of some neuronal Gα genes, including gpa-5, gpa-10, gpa-11, gpa-15 gsa-1, egl-30, and goa-1. Among these 7 Gα genes, only neuronal RNAi knockdown of gsa-1, gpa-10, and goa-1 affected toxicity of PS-NPs in inducing ROS production and in decreasing locomotion behavior. Some neuronal GPCRs (such as GTR-1, DCAR-1, DOP-2, NPR-8, NPR-12, NPR-9, and DAF-37) functioned upstream of GOA-1, some neuronal GPCRs (such as DCAR-1, DOP-2, NPR-9, NPR-8, and DAF-37) functioned upstream of GSA-1, and some neuronal GPCRs (such as DOP-2, NPR-8, DAF-37, and DCAR-1) functioned upstream of GPA-10 to regulate the toxicity of PS-NPs. Moreover, GOA-1 acted upstream of MPK-1/ERK MAPK, JNK-1/JNK MAPK, DBL-1/TGF-β, and DAF-7/ TGF-β, GSA-1 functioned upstream of MPK-1/ERK MAPK, JNK-1/JNK MAPK, and DBL-1/TGF-β, and GPA-10 functioned upstream of GLB-1/Globin and DBL-1/TGF-β to control the PS-NPs toxicity. Therefore, neuronal Gα proteins of GOA-1, GSA-1, and GPA-10 functioned to transduce signals of multiple GPCRs to different downstream signaling pathways during the control of PS-NPs toxicity in nematodes. Our results provide clues for understanding the important function of GPCRs-Gα signaling cascade in the neurons in controlling response to nanoplastics in organisms.

Probing Multi-Target Action of Phlorotannins as New Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors and Dopaminergic Receptor Modulators with the Potential for Treatment of Neuronal Disorders.

Modulation of multiple protein targets with a single compound is essential for the effective treatment of central nervous system disorders. In our previous G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) cell-based study, a selective human monoamine oxidase (hMAO)-A inhibitor, eckol, stimulated activity of dopamine D3 and D4 receptors. This result led to our interest in marine phlorotannin-mediated modulation of hMAO enzymes and related GPCRs in neuronal disorders. Here, we evaluate the multi-target effects of phloroglucinol, phlorofucofuroeckol-A (PFF-A), and dieckol by screening their modulatory activity against hMAO-A and -B and various neuronal GPCRs. Among the tested phlorotannins, PFF-A showed the strongest inhibitory activity against both hMAO isoforms, with higher selectivity toward hMAO-B than hMAO-A. Enzyme kinetics and docking data revealed that PFF-A noncompetitively acts on hMAOs into the alternative binding pocket of enzymes with allosteric functions. In a functional assay for GPCR screening, dieckol and PFF-A exhibited a multi-target combination of D3R/D4R agonism and D1/5HT1A/NK1 antagonism. In particular, they effectively stimulated D3R and D4R, compared to other GPCRs. Docking analysis confirmed that dieckol and PFF-A successfully docked into the conserved active sites of D3R and D4R and interacted with aspartyl and serine residues in the orthosteric binding pockets of the respective receptors. Based on our experimental and computational data, we established the structure-activity relationship between tested phlorotannins and target proteins, including hMAOs and GPCRs. Our current findings suggest that hMAO inhibitors dieckol and PFF-A, major phlorotannins of edible brown algae with multi-action on GPCRs, are potential agents for treatment of psychological disorders and Parkinson’s disease.

G protein-coupled receptor trafficking and signaling: new insights into the enteric nervous system.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are essential for the neurogenic control of gastrointestinal (GI) function and are important and emerging therapeutic targets in the gut. Detailed knowledge of both the distribution and functional expression of GPCRs in the enteric nervous system (ENS) is critical toward advancing our understanding of how these receptors contribute to GI function during physiological and pathophysiological states. Equally important, but less well defined, is the complex relationship between receptor expression, ligand binding, signaling, and trafficking within enteric neurons. Neuronal GPCRs are internalized following exposure to agonists and under pathological conditions, such as intestinal inflammation. However, the relationship between the intracellular distribution of GPCRs and their signaling outputs in this setting remains a "black box". This review will briefly summarize current knowledge of agonist-evoked GPCR trafficking and location-specific signaling in the ENS and identifies key areas where future research could be focused. Greater understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in regulating GPCR signaling in the ENS will provide new insights into GI function and may open novel avenues for therapeutic targeting of GPCRs for the treatment of digestive disorders.

Interrogating the Spatiotemporal Landscape of Neuromodulatory GPCR Signaling by Real-Time Imaging of cAMP in Intact Neurons and Circuits

Modulation of neuronal circuits is key to information processing in the brain. The majority of neuromodulators exert their effects by activating G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that control the production of second messengers directly impacting cellular physiology. How numerous GPCRs integrate neuromodulatory inputs while accommodating diversity of incoming signals is poorly understood. In this study, we develop an invivo tool and analytical suite for analyzing GPCR responses by monitoring the dynamics of a key second messenger, cyclic AMP (cAMP), with excellent quantitative and spatiotemporal resolution in various neurons. Using this imaging approach in combination with CRISPR/Cas9 editing and optogenetics, we interrogate neuromodulatory mechanisms of defined populations of neurons in an intact mesolimbic reward circuit and describe how individual inputs generate discrete second-messenger signatures in a cell- and receptor-specific fashion. This offers a resource for studying native neuronal GPCR signaling in real time.

The ganglioside GM1 interacts with the serotonin1A receptor via the sphingolipid binding domain

Glycosphingolipids are minor yet essential components of eukaryotic cell membranes and are involved in a variety of cellular processes. Although glycosphingolipids such as GM1 have been previously reported to influence the function of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the molecular mechanism remains elusive. In this paper, we have explored the interaction of GM1 with the serotonin1A receptor, an important neurotransmitter receptor that belongs to the GPCR family. To examine the molecular basis of the interaction of GM1 with the serotonin1A receptor, we performed a series of coarse-grain molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor embedded in membrane bilayers containing GM1. Our results show that GM1 interacts with the serotonin1A receptor predominantly at the extracellular loop 1 and specifically at the sphingolipid binding domain (SBD). The SBD motif consists of a characteristic combination of aromatic, basic and turn-inducing residues, and is evolutionarily conserved in case of the serotonin1A receptor. The interaction of the SBD site with GM1 appears to stabilize a ‘flip-out’ conformation in which W102 of the extracellular loop 1 flips out from the central lumen of the receptor toward the membrane. The population of the ‘flip-out’ conformation is increased in the presence of cholesterol. Our data strongly suggest that a direct interaction between GM1 and the SBD site of the serotonin1A receptor may occur in vivo. In view of the reported role of GM1 and the serotonin1A receptor in neurodegenerative diseases, GM1-receptor interaction assumes significance in the context of malfunctioning of neuronal GPCRs under such conditions.

GRK5 knockout mice created by TALEN‐mediated gene targeting (576.2)

G protein‐coupled receptor kinase 5 (GRK5) is one of the seven GRK family members whose primary function is to desensitize G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). In recently, GRK5 deficiency has been linked to early Alzheimer disease (AD), but the mechanism by which GRK5 deficiency may accelerate to AD pathogenesis remains elusive. The GRK5 mRNA is expressed widely in brain and peripheral tissues, with highest expression evident heart, lung, and placenta. In cellular model systems, GRK5 can phosphorylate several neuronal GPCRs including ß2 adrenergic, M2‐muscarinic, secretin, angiotensin AT1, and thyroid stimulating hormone receptors. Transcription activator‐like effector nucleases (TALENs) are programmable nucleases that join FokI endonucleases with the modular DNA‐binding domain of TALEs and highly effective in inducing mutations at specific genome loci. TALEN‐mediated mutagenesis in zygotes is a potential alternative to conventional gene targeting in mice. In the presented study, we report the generation of mice with genetic knockout of the GRK gene using TALENs. We designed TALEN vectors for exon 1, 3 and 5 of mouse GRK5 gene and tested their ability to alter the each surrogate vector in 293T cells. We prepared of mRNAs for the linearized TALEN using the mMessage mMachine T7 Ultra kit. mRNAs (4ng/μl) was injected into cytoplasm of 180 one‐cell embryos. After incubation for 24 hours, the selected two‐cell embryos transferred into the oviduct of seven pseudopregnant C57BL/6 mice. We confirmed the genotype of Fo mice by sequencing and T7E1 assay.Grant Funding Source: Supported by BK 21 plus program, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea

Functional Cooperation of Metabotropic Adenosine and Glutamate Receptors Regulates Postsynaptic Plasticity in the Cerebellum

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) may form heteromeric complexes and cooperatively mediate cellular responses. Although heteromeric GPCR complexes are suggested to occur in many neurons, their contribution to neuronal function remains unclear. We address this question using two GPCRs expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells: adenosine A1 receptor (A1R), which regulates neurotransmitter release and neuronal excitability in central neurons, and type-1 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1), which mediates cerebellar long-term depression, a form of synaptic plasticity crucial for cerebellar motor learning. We examined interaction between these GPCRs by immunocytochemical, biochemical, and Förster resonance energy transfer analyses in cultured mouse Purkinje cells and heterologous expression cells. These analyses revealed that the GPCRs closely colocalized and formed heteromeric complexes on the cell surfaces. Furthermore, our electrophysiological analysis showed that CSF levels (40-400 nm) of adenosine or synthetic A1R agonists with comparable potencies blocked mGluR1-mediated long-term depression of the postsynaptic glutamate-responsiveness (glu-LTD) of cultured Purkinje cells. A similar dose of the A1R agonist decreased the ligand affinity of mGluR1 and did not affect depolarization-induced Ca(2+) influx, which is an essential factor in inducing glu-LTD. The A1R agonist did not affect glu-LTD mimicked by direct activation of protein kinase C. These results suggest that A1R blocked glu-LTD by decreasing the ligand sensitivity of mGluR1, but not the coupling efficacy from mGluR1 to the intracellular signaling cascades. These findings provide a new insight into neuronal GPCR signaling and demonstrate a novel regulatory mechanism of synaptic plasticity.

Activation-dependent plasticity of polarized GPCR distribution on the neuronal surface

Directionality of information flow through neuronal networks is sustained at cellular level by polarized neurons. However, specific targeting or anchoring motifs responsible for polarized distribution on the neuronal surface have only been identified for a few neuronal G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Here, through mutational and pharmacological modifications of the conformational state of two model GPCRs, the axonal CB1R cannabinoid and the somatodendritic SSTR2 somatostatin receptors, we show important conformation-dependent variations in polarized distribution. The underlying mechanisms include lower efficiency of conformation-dependent GPCR endocytosis in axons, compared with dendrites, particularly at moderate activation levels, as well as endocytosis-dependent transcytotic delivery of GPCRs from the somatodendritic domain to distal axonal portions, shown by using compartmentalized microfluidic devices. Kinetic modeling predicted that GPCR distribution polarity is highly regulated by steady-state endocytosis, which is conformation dependent and is able to regulate the relative amount of GPCRs targeted to axons and that axonally polarized distribution is an intermediary phenotype that appears at moderate basal activation levels. Indeed, we experimentally show that gradual changes in basal activation-dependent endocytosis lead to highly correlated shifts of polarized GPCR distribution on the neuronal surface, which can even result in a fully reversed polarized distribution of naturally somatodendritic or axonal GPCRs. In conclusion, polarized distribution of neuronal GPCRs may have a pharmacologically controllable component, which, in the absence of dominant targeting motifs, could even represent the principal regulator of sub-neuronal distribution. Consequently, chronic modifications of basal GPCR activation by therapeutic or abused drugs may lead to previously unanticipated changes in brain function through perturbation of polarized GPCR distribution on the neuronal surface.

A Neuronal GPCR is Critical for the Induction of the Heat Shock Response in the NematodeC. elegans

In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, the heat shock response (HSR) is regulated at the organismal level by a network of thermosensory neurons that senses elevated temperatures and activates the HSR in remote tissues. Which neuronal receptors are required for this signaling mechanism and in which neurons they function are largely unanswered questions. Here we used worms that were engineered to exhibit RNA interference hypersensitivity in neurons to screen for neuronal receptors that are required for the activation of the HSR and identified a putative G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) as a novel key component of this mechanism. This gene, which we termed GPCR thermal receptor 1 (gtr-1), is expressed in chemosensory neurons and has no role in heat sensing but is critically required for the induction of genes that encode heat shock proteins in non-neural tissues upon exposure to heat. Surprisingly, the knock-down of gtr-1 by RNA interference protected worms expressing the Alzheimer's-disease-linked aggregative peptide Aβ3-42 from proteotoxicity but had no effect on lifespan. This study provides several novel insights: (1) it shows that chemosensory neurons play important roles in the nematode's HSR-regulating mechanism, (2) it shows that lifespan and heat stress resistance are separable, and (3) it strengthens the emerging notion that the ability to respond to heat comes at the expense of protein homeostasis (proteostasis).

Generation of Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs) Using Directed Molecular Evolution

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their signal transductions are important for both physiological and pathological processes in neuron systems. Neuronal GPCRs activated by synthetic ligands have been created by designed mutagenesis for studying their functions and signal pathways. However, these engineered GPCRs have problems, such as their high constitutive activity. To overcome this drawback, a new generation of receptors termed designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs), have been designed. DREADDs are exclusively activated by synthetic ligands, but are insensitive to their endogenous ligand and have no constitutive activity, which provides the ability to selectively modulate signal transduction of certain GPCRs in vitro and in vivo. This protocol provides detailed instructions for creating DREADDs using directed molecular evolution. The procedures to generate DREADDS include GPCR functional expression in yeast, mutant GPCR library generation, and high-throughput yeast screening. These methods are general and suitable for any GPCRs that can be functionally expressed in yeast.

Rapid Activation of Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels by Immobile G-Protein-Coupled Receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate slow synaptic transmission and many other effects of small molecule and peptide neurotransmitters. In the standard model of GPCR signaling, receptors and G-proteins diffuse laterally within the plane of the plasma membrane and encounter each other by random collision. This model predicts that signaling will be most efficient if both GPCRs and G-proteins are free to diffuse, thus maximizing collision frequency. However, neuronal GPCRs are often recruited to and enriched at specific synaptic locations, suggesting receptor mobility is restricted in these cells. Here, we test the hypothesis that restricting GPCR mobility impairs signaling in neurons by limiting the frequency of collisions between receptors and G-proteins. Mu-opioid receptors (MORs) were immobilized on the surface of cerebellar granule neurons by avidin-mediated cross-linking, and inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels were used as rapid indicators of G-protein activation. Mobile and immobile MORs activated GIRK channels with the same onset kinetics and agonist sensitivity in these neurons. In a heterologous expression system, GFP (green fluorescent protein)-tagged G alpha(oA) subunits remained mobile after cross-linking, but their mobility was reduced in the presence of immobile MORs, suggesting that these receptors and subunits were transiently precoupled. In addition, channel activation could be reconstituted with immobile GPCRs, G-protein heterotrimers, and GIRK channels. These results show that collision frequency is not rate-limiting for G-protein activation in CNS neurons, and are consistent with the idea that signaling components are compartmentalized or preassembled.

Constitutive Activation Drives Compartment-Selective Endocytosis and Axonal Targeting of Type 1 Cannabinoid Receptors

The type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) is one of the most abundant G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the brain, predominantly localized to axons of GABAergic neurons. Like several other neuronal GPCRs, CB1R displays significant in vitro constitutive activity (i.e., spontaneous activation in the absence of ligand). However, a clear biological role for constitutive GPCR activity is still lacking. This question was addressed by studying the consequences of constitutive activation on the intracellular trafficking of endogenous or transfected CB1Rs in cultured hippocampal neurons using optical and electron microscopy. We found that constitutive activity results in a permanent cycle of endocytosis and recycling, which is restricted to the somatodendritic compartment. Thus, CB1Rs are continuously removed by endocytosis from the plasma membrane in the somatodendritic compartment but not in axons, where CB1Rs accumulate on surface. Blocking constitutive activity by short-term incubation with inverse agonist 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-4-methyl-N-4-morpholinyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM281) results in sequestration of recycled CB1Rs on the somatodendritic plasma membrane. Long-term inhibition of endocytosis by cotransfection of dominant-negative proteins results in impaired axonal polarization of surface-bound CB1Rs. Kinetic analysis shows that the majority of newly synthesized CB1Rs arrive first to the somatodendritic plasma membrane, from where they are rapidly removed by AM281-sensitive constitutive endocytosis before being delivered to axons. Thus, constitutive-activity driven somatodendritic endocytosis is required for the proper axonal targeting of CB1R, representing a novel, conformation-dependent targeting mechanism for axonal GPCRs.

Differential Desensitization of Responses Mediated by Presynaptic and Postsynaptic A1Adenosine Receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) often desensitize during continuous activation, but it is not known whether desensitization is influenced by subcellular location. In hippocampal neurons, activation of adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs) or GABA(B) receptors on synaptic terminals inhibits neurotransmitter release, whereas activation of the same receptors on cell bodies and dendrites decreases excitability by activating inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. Here we report that responses mediated by presynaptic A1Rs desensitize more slowly than responses mediated by postsynaptic (somatodendritic) A1Rs in cultured neurons. Agonist treatment for 2 hr has no effect on adenosine-induced presynaptic inhibition, whereas such treatment nearly abolishes adenosine-induced activation of postsynaptic GIRK channels. Agonist treatment for longer periods (>12 hr) eventually desensitizes A1R-mediated presynaptic inhibition. Presynaptic and postsynaptic responses both recover from desensitization after agonist removal, but recovery of presynaptic inhibition requires more time. Desensitization of postsynaptic responses apparently occurs at the level of the receptor, because postsynaptic G-proteins and GIRK channels appear to be fully functional. Inhibition of voltage-gated calcium channels by postsynaptic A1Rs also desensitizes rapidly, although this desensitization is less complete than is observed for activation of postsynaptic GIRK channels. Comparison of concentration-response curves for presynaptic and postsynaptic responses suggests that a receptor reserve exists for presynaptic inhibition, but that the magnitude of this reserve is insufficient to account for the absence of presynaptic desensitization after brief agonist exposure. These results suggest that agonist-induced desensitization of responses mediated by neuronal GPCRs may depend on the subcellular location of the receptors.