Neurologic Assessment In Neuro-Oncology Research Articles

L-RNA aptamer-based CXCL12 inhibition combined with radiotherapy in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma: dose escalation of the phase I/II GLORIA trial

The chemokine CXCL12 promotes glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) by facilitating vasculogenesis. Here we report outcomes of the dose-escalation part of GLORIA (NCT04121455), a phase I/II trial combining RT and the CXCL12-neutralizing aptamer olaptesed pegol (NOX-A12; 200/400/600 mg per week) in patients with incompletely resected, newly-diagnosed GBM lacking MGMT methylation. The primary endpoint was safety, secondary endpoints included maximum tolerable dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), NOX-A12 plasma levels, topography of recurrence, tumor vascularization, neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO), quality of life (QOL), median progression-free survival (PFS), 6-months PFS and overall survival (OS). Treatment was safe with no dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related deaths. The MTD has not been reached and, thus, 600 mg per week of NOX-A12 was established as RP2D for the ongoing expansion part of the trial. With increasing NOX-A12 dose levels, a corresponding increase of NOX-A12 plasma levels was observed. Of ten patients enrolled, nine showed radiographic responses, four reached partial remission. All but one patient (90%) showed at best response reduced perfusion values in terms of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). The median PFS was 174 (range 58-260) days, 6-month PFS was 40.0% and the median OS 389 (144-562) days. In a post-hoc exploratory analysis of tumor tissue, higher frequency of CXCL12+ endothelial and glioma cells was significantly associated with longer PFS under NOX-A12. Our data imply safety of NOX-A12 and its efficacy signal warrants further investigation.

Fluorescein-guided surgery in high-grade gliomas: focusing on the eloquent and deep-seated areas

PurposeThe vital function of eloquent and deep brain areas necessitates precise treatment for tumors located in these regions. Fluorescein-guided surgery (FGS) has been widely used for high-grade gliomas (HGGs) resection. Nevertheless, the safety and efficacy of utilizing this technique for resecting brain tumors located in eloquent and deep-seated areas remain uncertain. This study aims to assess the safety and extent of resection of HGGs in these challenging tumors with fluorescein and explore its impact on patient survival.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and radiological data of 67 consecutive patients with eloquent or deep-seated HGGs who underwent surgery between January 2020 and June 2023. Lacroix functional location grade was used to determine the eloquence of the tumors. The comparison between the fluorescence-guided surgery group (FGS, n = 32) and the conventional white-light microscopic surgery group (non-FGS, n = 35) included assessments of extent of resection (EOR), rates of gross total resection (GTR, 100%) and near-total resection (NTR, 99 to 98%), postoperative Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scores, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fluorescein-guided technology in tumor resection at these specific locations.ResultsBaseline of demographics, lesion location, and pathology showed no significant difference between the two groups. GTR of the FGS group was higher than the non-FGS group (84.4% vs. 60.0%, OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.18–10.28, p < 0.05). The FGS group also showed higher GTR + NTR (EOR ≥ 98%) than the non-FGS group (93.8% vs. 65.7%, OR 7.83, 95% CI 1.86–36.85, p < 0.01). 87.0% of eloquent tumors (Lacroix grade III) in the FGS group achieved GTR + NTR, compared to 52.2% of control group (OR 6.11, 95% CI 1.50–22.78, p < 0.05). For deep-seated tumors, the rate of GTR + NTR in the two groups were 91.7% and 53.3%, respectively (OR 9.62, 95% CI 1.05–116.50, p < 0.05). No significant difference of the preoperative NANO score of the two groups was found. The postoperative NANO score of the FGS group was significantly lower than the non-FGS group (2.56 ± 1.29 vs. 3.43 ± 1.63, p < 0.05). Median OS of the FGS group was 4.2 months longer than the non-FGS group despite no statistical difference (18.2 months vs. 14.0 months, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36–1.11, p = 0.112), while PSF was found significantly longer in FGS patients than those of the non-FGS group (11.2 months vs. 7.7 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35–0.99, p < 0.05).ConclusionSodium fluorescein-guided surgery for high-grade gliomas in eloquent and deep-seated brain regions enables more extensive resection while preserving neurologic function and improve patient survival.

High-Dose Methotrexate Containing Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Nivolumab Consolidation in Older (≥ 65) Patients with Previously Untreated Primary CNS Lymphoma

Introduction: High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-containing chemotherapy followed by either autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or whole-brain irradiation (WBI) is widely considered the standard for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) treatment. However, many older frail patients with PCNSL are unable to undergo ASCT or WBI due to increased risk of treatment-related toxicity, such as infections and neurotoxicity. Without consolidation, survival outcomes are significantly worse, with a 3-year progression free survival (PFS) rate of ~ 30%. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed for older PCNSL patients. Recently, nivolumab, an anti-PD1 antibody, showed promising clinical activities in relapsed/refractory PCNSL, and we hypothesized that addition of nivolumab in the frontline setting would be safe and improve survival outcomes of older PCNSL patients who are deemed poor candidates for ASCT or WBI. Methods: In this phase 1/1B single-arm multicenter study, patients ≥ 65, who were deemed poor candidates for ASCT and WBI, with previously untreated PCNSL received at least 3 cycles of HD-MTX-containing chemotherapy followed by nivolumab consolidation for 6 cycles (NCT 04022980). Patients with systemic lymphoma or known ocular involvement were excluded from the study. Stage 1 was designed to evaluate the safety of nivolumab consolidation after HD-MTX-containing induction chemotherapy. A 3+3 design was used as safety run-in, initiating 6 patients on nivolumab at the FDA-approved single-agent dose and monitoring for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during Cycle 1. If less than 2 out of 6 subjects experienced a DLT, then the stage 2 part of study would initiate to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab consolidation in terms of the 2-year PFS. The patient's neurological function was assessed at baseline and throughout the study follow-up using the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale. Results: A total of 14 patients enrolled in the study between April 2020 and December 2022 at 4 US sites. In 14 evaluable patients who underwent the study treatment, the median age was 72 years (range, 65-79), 71% patients were female, and 35% patients had ECOG score of 2 or 3. Variations of the following regimens were used for induction: 43% R-MPV (rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine) (43%), 29% MRT (methotrexate, rituximab, and temozolomide), 21% MR (methotrexate and rituximab), and 7% MATRix (methotrexate, cytarabine, thiotepa, and rituximab). After induction, 58% achieved a complete response (CR), 33% achieved a partial response (PR), and 8% had a stable disease (SD). Patients received a median of 6 cycles of nivolumab consolidation. Patients who received at least 1 cycle of nivolumab consolidation achieved an overall response rate of 83% with a CR rate of 75%. With a median follow-up duration of 18 months, the 1-year overall survival (OS) and PFS rates were 91.7% and 66.1%, respectively. No DLTs were observed during Cycle 1 of nivolumab consolidation in Stage 1. The most common grade ≥ 3 Adverse Events (AEs) associated with nivolumab consolidation included neutropenia (14%) and fatigue (7%). One patient (7%) developed a grade 4 Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated with sepsis and acute kidney injury, requiring discontinuation of nivolumab after Cycle 1. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates encouraging safety and clinical outcomes of nivolumab consolidation in older PCNSL patients who are deemed poor candidates for ASCT or WBI. No DLT was observed during the safety run-in phase, and there was no unexpected toxicity associated with nivolumab although 1 patient discontinued the study treatment due to Stevens-Johnson syndrome, a rare but known AE associated with nivolumab, after Cycle 1. Overall, nivolumab consolidation was associated with favorable survival rates in a group of patients with poor-risk PCNSL. We are in the process of identifying various clinical and biological factors, including 9p24.1 copy number alteration, in association with the response to nivolumab consolidation. Furthermore, changes in the neurological function based on the NANO scale assessed before and after the nivolumab consolidation are being analyzed.

P11.63.B VALIDATING THE NEUROLOGIC ASSESSMENT IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY (NANO) SCALE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: A MULTI-CENTER PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND The neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale was developed as a standardized metric to objectively measure neurologic function in patients with brain tumors and complement radiographic assessment in defining overall outcomes. The scale has been incorporated in clinical trials, however, real-world use of the NANO scale to drive clinical decision-making and the predictive value of the NANO scale to determine overall survival remains unclear in glioblastoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS We report on an ongoing multi-center study of prospective NANO score collection to evaluate neurologic function in patients with glioblastoma, seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (SHSC). Patient demographics, tumor histology, molecular status, treatment history, and progression dates are being captured. NANO score, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and corticosteroid dose are collected at prespecified time points (prior to start of therapy, and during each subsequent MRI visit). Changes in the NANO score will be correlated to overall survival and subgroup analyses will be performed for specific domains of the NANO scale. Statistical analyses including descriptive data analysis and generalized linear models will be performed using R (version 3.4.3). RESULTS Since June 2020, 145 patients have been enrolled in this study across the two sites including 90 (62%) with ≥2 follow-up visits. 129 patients had baseline post-operative NANOs captured, with 45 (35%) patients having no deficits in any NANO domain at baseline. All patients with intact baseline NANO had a KPS of 80 or above. Adaptation to a virtual platform for NANO (vNANO) allowed for improved recruitment and follow-up of patients. Validation of vNANO is being performed in a subset of this population. Our interim analysis will be presented at the 2023 EANO meeting. CONCLUSION Evaluation of neurologic function by NANO is feasible in both an in-person and virtual framework in a prospective multi-center study in patients with glioblastoma. NANO is able to objectively track neurologic function throughout disease course in glioblastoma. Integration of vNANO may allow for reduced clinical visits and improve access to specialized care for patients in geographically remote locations.

P01.09.A THE NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OF LOWER GRADE GLIOMA PATIENTS BEFORE START OF RADIOTHERAPY IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RADIOLOGICAL APPEARANCE OF THE BRAIN

Abstract BACKGROUND The cause for neurocognitive function (NCF) impairments in patients with lower grade glioma (LGG) is typically multifactorial. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between NCF and the radiological appearance of the brain before start of radiotherapy (RT) in LGG patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Around start of RT we evaluated NCF of LGG patients treated with proton therapy. The assessment included 10 neuropsychological tests with 20 measures that could be categorized over 6 cognitive domains. Raw test scores were converted to Z scores based on normative data. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was defined as a Z score of less than -2 on a single measure, or Z score of less than -1.5 on multiple measures. An impaired cognitive domain was defined as a mean composite Z score of less than -1.5. The radiological appearance of the brain outside the tumor region was assessed on a pre-RT planning MRI using the Fazekas score and Global Cortical Atrophy (GCA) score. For statistical analysis we used Chi Square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS Between 2018 and March 2022, 126 LGG patients started RT treatment, 119 patients (94%) had NCF assessment pre-RT and were available for analysis. Median age was 41 years, 51% of patients was male, reported comorbidities included hypertension in 7%, diabetes mellitus in 3% and cardiovascular 13% of patients. The World Health Organization (WHO) performance scores and the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scores were 0 - 1, in 98%, and 92% of patients. The Fazekas score was 0 in 75%, 1 in 18% and 2 in 6% and 3 in 2% of patients. The GCA score was 0 in 59%, 1 in 38%, 2 in 3% of patients. In 77 (65%) patients the performance on the NCF assessment indicated the presence of MCI. Patients with MCI had a significant radiologically worse appearance of the brain (Fazekas score 1 or higher 31.2% versus 14.3%, p = 0.043; and GCA score 1 or higher 49.4% versus 26.2%, p = 0.014). Domain impairments were present in executive functions and attention (26%); verbal memory (23%); verbal functions (20%); non-verbal memory (20%); processing speed (18%); and working memory (14%). Fazekas score 1 or higher was significantly associated with lower composite Z scores of verbal functions (median (IQR) -0.84 (1.12) versus -0.40 (0.94), p=0.014); verbal memory (median (IQR) -0.66 (1.26) versus -0.20 (1.35), p=0.045) and non-verbal memory (median (IQR) -0.45 (2.10) versus -0.20 (1.36), p=0.037). There were no significant associations found between the GCA score and domain composite scores. CONCLUSION This cohort of LGG patients had a good clinical and neurological baseline function pre-RT. We found significant relationships between NCF and both white matter damage and atrophy of the brain. The Fazekas and GCA score are objective and easily obtained radiological measures, that could be a relevant parameter to record in LGG patients.

LONGITUDINAL NEUROLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS IN BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS: CORRELATION BETWEEN NANO DOMAINS AND PERFORMANCE STATUS

Abstract The Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status are clinician-reported outcomes critical in guiding management and prognostication in patients with primary brain tumors as they can reflect longitudinal functional changes. However, they are subjective. The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale is a metric with specific neurological domains that was subsequently developed to provide an objective standardized measure of the neurologic functional status of patients, but how longitudinal changes in NANO scale relate to KPS or ECOG scores is unknown. METHODS: A linear mixed model analysis involving 111 patients with primary brain tumors was performed. RESULTS: Statistically significant associations were identified between changes in specific NANO domains and KPS or ECOG scores. After controlling for time course both in univariable and multivariable analyses, worsening scores in gait, language and behavior domains showed significant association with decreased KPS. Gait and behavior were demonstrated to be significantly associated with ECOG both in univariable and multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The neurologic status of patients with a primary brain tumor is closely related to their performance status. In particular, the patient’s cognitive status and mobility have the greatest impact on their functional status and therefore their prognosis. Interventions and supportive care targeting these domains of function may help improve the outcomes of patients with brain tumors.

Association of the classification of intraoperative adverse events (ClassIntra) with complications and neurological outcome after neurosurgical procedures: a prospective cohort study

PurposeTo analyze the reliability of the classification of intraoperative adverse events (ClassIntra) to reflect intraoperative complications of neurosurgical procedures and the potential to predict the postoperative outcome including the neurological performance. The ClassIntra classification was recently introduced and found to be reliable for assessing intraoperative adverse events and predicting postoperative complications across different surgical disciplines. Nevertheless, its potential role for neurosurgical procedures remains elusive.MethodsThis is a prospective, monocentric cohort study assessing the ClassIntra in 422 adult patients who underwent a neurosurgical procedure and were hospitalized between July 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative complications graded according to ClassIntra and the association with postoperative outcome reflected by the Clavien-Dindo classification and comprehensive complication index (CCI). The ClassIntra is defined as intraoperative adverse events as any deviation from the ideal course on a grading scale from grade 0 (no deviation) to grade V (intraoperative death) and was set at sign-out in agreement between neurosurgeon and anesthesiologist. Secondary outcomes were the neurological outcome after surgery as defined by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), modified Rankin scale (mRS), Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale, National Institute Health of Strokes Scale (NIHSS), and Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), and need for unscheduled brain scan.ResultsOf 442 patients (mean [SD] age, 56.1 [16.2]; 235 [55.7%] women and 187 [44.3%] men) who underwent a neurosurgical procedure, 169 (40.0%) patients had an intraoperative adverse event (iAE) classified as ClassIntra I or higher. The NIHSS score at admission (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03–1.63, female gender (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23–0.84), extracranial procedures (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.08–0.61), and emergency cases (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.53–3.78) were independent risk factors for a more severe iAE. A ClassIntra ≥ II was associated with increased odds of postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo (p < 0.01), neurological deterioration at discharge (p < 0.01), prolonged hospital (p < 0.01), and ICU stay (p < 0.01). For elective craniotomies, severity of ClassIntra was associated with the CCI (p < 0.01) and need for unscheduled CT or MRI scan (p < 0.01). The proportion of a ClassIntra ≥ II was significantly higher for emergent craniotomies (56.2%) and associated with in-hospital mortality, and an unfavorable neurological outcome (p < 0.01).ConclusionFindings of this study suggest that the ClassIntra is sensitive for assessing intraoperative adverse events and sufficient to identify patients with a higher risk for developing postoperative complications after a neurosurgical procedure.

P11.01.B Lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis and bleeding complications in primary brain tumor patients: A prospective study

Abstract Background Primary brain tumor patients have a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Bleeding risk with prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation is an important concern in these patients, and data on the management of asymptomatic VTE events in this population are lacking. The aim of this prospective study is to investigate risk and risk factors for asymptomatic lower-extremity deep-vein thrombosis (LE-DVT) in patients with primary brain tumors, and to estimate the rate of bleeding complications on full, prophylactic or no anticoagulation. Material and Methods We included consecutive patients with primary brain tumours undergoing surgery. Screening for asymptomatic LE-DVT by compression ultrasound (CUS) was performed pre-operatively and postoperatively within 2 months after surgery. Telephone follow-up was done 6 and 12 months after surgery. The protocol pre-specified therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in case of detection of an asymptomatic LE-DVT. Results Fifty patients were included (female: 34%, median age 58 years, WHO grade IV tumors: 78%, prophylactic-dose LMWH at baseline: 12%). During a median observation period of 9.1 months, LE-DVT was detected in 9 patients (18%). LE-DVTs included two asymptomatic events (4%) at pre-operative screening, five asymptomatic events (10%) at postoperative screening, and two symptomatic events (4%, both 4-level LE-DVT) at telephone follow-up. This corresponded to a 12-month cumulative incidence of LE-DVT of 14.9% (95%CI: 6.4-26.6). At postoperative screening, n=10 patients were on prophylactic-dose LMWH, and one of these patients had an LE-DVT event detected by screening. The two patients with symptomatic LE-DVT were not on thromboprophylaxis at the time of event. Among a variety of investigated potential risk factors, only higher age (Odds Ratio (OR) per 5 years increase=1.46, 95%CI: 1.01-2.13, p=0.05), higher neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale (OR per 1 point increase=1.59, 1.00-2.54, p=0.05), higher serum Galectin-3 levels (OR per 1ng/ml increase=1.20, 1.01-1.42, p=0.041) but not D-Dimer (OR per 1mg/L increase=1.89, 0.75-4.77, p=0.178) emerged as significant predictors of any LE-DVT. Six patients (12%) developed bleeding events, including n=3 operative intracranial bleedings without LMWH, n=1 spontaneous ventricular hemorrhage without LMWH, n=1 minor subcutaneous bleeding without LMWH, and 1 intracerebral hematoma during therapeutic-dose LMWH initiated for asymptomatic distal LE-DVT. Conclusion In our study we detected a high-frequency of asymptomatic LE-DVT in patients with primary brain tumours. Conversely, symptomatic LE-DVT risk was low, which may be related to prior screening. Patients with primary brain tumors appear to have LE-DVT risk factors specific to this entity. Prophylactic-dose LMWH did not show any adverse safety signals regarding bleeding.

OTHR-08. Pediatric Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-oncology (pNANO) Scale: A tool to assess neurologic function for Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology (RAPNO)

Background: The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale, a standardized metric to objectively measure neurologic function in adult brain tumor patients, complements radiographic assessment in evaluating outcomes of neuro-oncology patients in clinical trials and clinical practice. Currently, there is no standardized measure for neurologic function in pediatric neuro-oncology patients despite their distinct clinical presentations and tumor locations. Therefore, we developed a dedicated pediatric NANO (pNANO) scale. Methods: An international group of pediatric neurologists and adult and pediatric neuro-oncologists convened bi-weekly over 5 months to draft the pNANO scale as an objective and quantifiable measure of neurologic function in children that can be administered during routine examination by pediatric-trained providers of any sub-specialty and be utilized together with other indicators to assess response in clinical trials. Results: Ten relevant domains of neurologic function were identified based on common pediatric brain tumor locations: gait, strength, cerebellar function, visual fields, visual acuity, facial strength, level of consciousness, extraocular movements, dysarthria and dysphagia. For each domain, developmental age appropriate levels of function were defined and categorized. Each domain, based on direct observation and testing during any routine neurological exam, can be used for longitudinal monitoring. Conclusions: The pNANO scale has been developed and aims to provide an objective metric of neurologic function for pediatric brain tumor patients. This scale will be tested for reliability, feasibility and inter-observer variability. Consistent evaluation of neurologic function using pNANO along with radiographic assessment will enable more comprehensive and standardized response assessment in pediatric neuro-oncology patients enrolled in clinical trials.

Correlation between Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria and Clinical Outcome in Patients with Brain Tumor

Response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria was established to improve the assessment of tumor response and provide guidance on the assessment of response and endpoints in neuro-oncology clinical trials. Neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale is an instrument used for assessing neurological function objectively and practical in intracranial tumor patients. This study aimed to determine the association between RANO criteria with clinical outcome measured by NANO scale in intracranial tumors patients. There were 36 intracranial tumor patients that were studied in Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan. The RANO criteria were obtained by comparing the size of the enhanced lesion using Computed Tomography (CT) scan within an interval of a minimum of four weeks of treatment. NANO scale is a quantifiable evaluation of nine relevant neurologic domains based on examination. The NANO scale included gait, strength, ataxia, sensation, visual fields, facial strength, language, level of consciousness, and behavior as assessed domains from the medical record. We analyzed the correlation between the RANO criteria and NANO scale score using the Spearman correlation test. There were 19 males and 17 females. The mean age was 45.22±9.68 years. There were 20 patients (55.6%) with meningioma, 11 patients (30.6%) with glioma, 3 patients (8.3%) with brain metastase, and 2 patients (5.6%) with craniopharyngioma. The mean NANO scale scores for stable and progressive RANO criteria were 4.29±2.02 and 7.88±2.99, respectively. There was a significant correlation between RANO criteria and NANO scale score in patients with intracranial tumor (r = 0.468; p = 0.004). Patients with stable RANO had lower NANO scale scores indicating better response to treatment and clinical outcome.

The Prognostic Value of NANO Scale Assessment in IDH-Wild-Type Glioblastoma Patients

BackgroundIDH-wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent brain-derived malignancy. Despite intense research efforts, it is still associated with a very poor prognosis. Several parameters were identified as prognostic, including general physical performance. In neuro-oncology (NO), special emphasis is put on focal deficits and cognitive (dys-)function. The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale was proposed in order to standardize the assessment of neurological performance in NO. This study evaluated whether NANO scale assessment provides prognostic information in a standardized collective of GBM patients.MethodsThe records of all GBM patients treated between 2014 and 2019 at our facility were retrospectively screened. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 years, at least 3 months postoperative follow-up, and preoperative and postoperative cranial magnetic resonance imaging. The NANO scale was assessed pre- and postoperatively as well as at 3 months follow-up. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were carried to investigate the prognostic value.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-one patients were included. In univariate analysis, poor postoperative neurological performance (HR 1.13, p = 0.004), poor neurological performance at 3 months postsurgery (HR 1.37, p < 0.001), and neurological deterioration during follow-up (HR 1.38, p < 0.001), all assessed via the NANO scale, were associated with shorter survival. In multivariate analysis including other prognostic factors such as the extent of resection, adjuvant treatment regimen, or age, NANO scale assessment at 3 months postoperative follow-up was independently associated with survival prediction (HR 1.36, p < 0.001). The optimal NANO scale cutoff for patient stratification was 3.5 points.ConclusionNeurological performance assessment employing the NANO scale might provide prognostic information in patients suffering from GBM.

INNV-40. REAL WORLD INTEGRATION OF THE NEUROLOGIC ASSESSMENT IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY (NANO) SCALE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE IN PATIENTS WITH IDH-WT GBM

BACKGROUNDThe neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale was developed as a standardized metric to objectively measure neurologic function in patients with brain tumors and complement radiographic assessment in defining overall outcome. The scale has been incorporated in clinical trials. Early data is suggestive of feasibility and that NANO contributes to overall outcome assessment. However, real-world use of the NANO scale to drive clinical-decision making and the predictive value of the NANO scale to determine overall survival remains unclear in IDH-wt GBM.METHODSWe report on an ongoing study using the NANO scale to evaluate neurologic function in patients with IDH-wt GBM, seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). Patient demographics, tumor histology and molecular status, treatment history and progression dates are being captured. NANO score, as collected by a built-in scale in our institutional electronic medical record (EMR), functional status (Karnofsky performance status) and corticosteroid dose are collected at prespecified time points (prior to start of therapy, and during each subsequent MRI visit). Changes in the NANO score will be correlated to overall survival. Statistical analyses including descriptive data analysis and generalized linear models will be performed using R (version 3.4.3).RESULTSSince June 2020, 50 patients have been enrolled in this study, including 42 (84%) with ≥2 follow up visits. Study accrual was initially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but adaptation to a virtual platform for NANO allowed for improved recruitment and follow up of patients. Study results will be available for discussion at the 2021 SNO conference.CONCLUSIONSEvaluation of neurologic function by NANO is feasible in a virtual framework in a prospective study in patients with GBM, aided by integration of the scale in our institutional EMR. NANO is able to objectively track neurologic function throughout disease course in IDH-wt GBM.

The Effects of Administrated Dexamethasone on Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-oncology Scale in Patients with Intracranial Tumors

BACKGROUND: In intracranial tumors, glucocorticoids are the main therapy to treat peritumoral edema. Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) score is an instrument that can assess neurological function objectively and practically in patients with intracranial tumors. AIM: This study aims to determine the effect of dexamethasone administration on the NANO score of intracranial tumor patients. METHODS: This study was a pre-experimental study with a pre and post-test design at the H. Adam Malik General Hospital in Medan from March to September 2020. The study population was intracranial tumor patients. The research subject were 37 subjects taken consecutively. Treated with dexamethasone injection, then examined the NANO score before and after receiving dexamethasone injection on days 1, 2, and 3. Statistical analysis with Friedman test. RESULTS: Based on the demographic characteristics of the research subjects, the mean age was 53.29 ± 8.5 years. Most of the research subjects were male (54.1%) while female (45.9%). Most types of intracranial tumors were secondary tumors (59.5%) while primary tumors (40.5%). The significant effect of dexamethasone on NANO score in patients with intracranial tumors (p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is an effect of dexamethasone on the NANO score of patients with intracranial tumors.

Digital measurement of functional status of patients with glioblastoma.

2016 Background: Among the primary aims of new therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) are the reduction of morbidity and restoration or preservation of quality of life (QoL). Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in class, oral, selective inhibitor of nuclear export which blocks exportin 1 (XPO1), forcing the nuclear retention and reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins, ultimately causing cell death in cancer cells. SEL is approved for the treatment of previously treated multiple myeloma and DLBCL. XPORT-GBM-029 (NCT04421378) is a phase 1 dose finding study followed by an open-label randomized phase 2, 3-arm trial to evaluate SEL in combination with standard therapies for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM: Arm A (ndGBM, uMGMT) – radiation +/- SEL; Arm B (ndGBM, mMGMT) – radiation and temozolomide +/- SEL; Arm C (rGBM) – lomustine +/- SEL at first relapse. We look to identify sensitive, reliable, and clinically meaningful digital assessments of the functional status of ndGBM and rGBM patients via a patient-centric approach. Methods: XPORT-GBM-029 incorporates standard clinical and imaging evaluations of GBM progression with novel digital tools that objectively measure motor and cognitive function. The study is conducted at 50 sites globally with the aim of enrolling 350 patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Following discussions with KOLs and patient advocacy partners at EndbrainCancer, we surveyed GBM patients and their caregivers to identify disease manifestations critical to patients’ QoL. The survey revealed four key areas impacting patients’ QoL that can be affected by GBM therapies and can be objectively monitored: cognitive function, lateralization, fatigue, and sleep. In this trial we use objective measurements to evaluate SEL’s effects on GBM patients’ QoL. Patients wear inertial sensors to measure their activity and sleep and complete a cognitive battery at baseline and before each MRI. Results: Associations between objective digital measures of activity, gait, fatigue, sleep, and cognition will be examined with respect to clinical assessments including physical examinations, modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (mRANO), Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO), Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) QoL questionnaires. Descriptive summary statistics and plots are employed in exploratory data analysis, and other advanced data mining methods may also be considered. Conclusions: XPORT-GBM-029 trial is probably the first large, prospective, longitudinal study in GBM patients employing digital markers and may provide useful information regarding the utility of wearable and mobile devices for measuring functional outcomes in clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT04421378.

Data-driven prediction of postoperative clinical outcome using the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) score in glioblastoma patients - the clinical usefulness of a black-box model

Data-driven prediction of postoperative clinical outcome using the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) score in glioblastoma patients - the clinical usefulness of a black-box model

NCOG-44. NEUROLOGIC ASSESSMENT IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY (NANO) SCALE IN A PHASE II STUDY OF PEMBROLIZUMAB OR PEMBROLIZUMAB PLUS BEVACIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract PURPOSE The neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale was developed as a standardized metric to objectively measure neurologic function in brain tumor patients to complement radiographic assessment in defining overall outcome. A multicenter, phase 2 study of pembrolizumab with or without bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma incorporated the NANO scale as an exploratory endpoint. METHODS Neurologic examination was evaluated at baseline and MRI assessments using the NANO scale until patients came off study. Statistical descriptive data analysis was performed using R (version 3.4.3). Correlation analysis utilized Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS NANO compliance rate was 94% in 80 patients accrued on the study. Of the 80 patients, 7 were missing NANO at baseline visit and were excluded from analysis for NANO response criteria. Fifteen patients did not have end of treatment NANO evaluation. Of 73 patients, 35 (48%) had a normal neurologic examination at baseline by NANO. Strength and language accounted for the majority of changes in neurologic function over the course of study treatment. Eighteen patients (25%) had neurologic progression by NANO, of whom 2 did not have concurrent radiographic progression. Three patients (pembrolizumab plus bevacizumab cohort) had a neurologic response associated with stable disease on MRI. NANO assessment prior to initiation of cycle 3 correlated with RANO response (p=0.011), change in KPS (p=0.002) and dexamethasone requirement (p=0.007) while those with NANO progression at this assessment had worse overall survival (291 vs 324 days), but this trend did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.2). CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of neurologic function by NANO scale was feasible in a multicenter prospective study in patients with GBM with a high compliance rate. The NANO scale objectively tracked stable neurologic function in most patients throughout the trial period and was associated with a trend for survival.

CTIM-32. PHASE II AND BIOMARKER STUDY OF PEMBROLIZUMAB OR PEMBROLIZUMAB PLUS BEVACIZUMAB FOR RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS

Abstract PURPOSE Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is upregulated in glioblastoma and may contribute to immunosuppression. We performed a phase 2 study of pembrolizumab, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) blocking antibody alone or with the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma with detailed analyses of biomarkers and patient neurologic function. METHODS Eighty bevacizumab-naive, recurrent glioblastoma patients were randomized to receive pembrolizumab with bevacizumab (cohort A, n=50) or pembrolizumab monotherapy (cohort B, n=30). The primary endpoint was six-month progression-free survival (PFS-6). Exploratory endpoints included evaluation of tumor PD-L1 expression, TIL density, immune activation gene expression signature and plasma cytokines with outcome. Changes in neurologic function were prospectively assessed using the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale. RESULTS Pembrolizumab alone or with bevacizumab was well tolerated but of limited benefit. For cohort A, PFS-6 was 26.0% (95% CI: 16.3, 41.5), median OS was 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.7, 14.2), ORR was 20% and median duration of response was 48 weeks. For cohort B, PFS-6 was 6.7% (95% CI: 1.7, 25.4), median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.5, 12.5) and ORR was 0%. Factors associated with worsened OS included baseline dexamethasone use and increased post-therapy plasma VEGF (cohort A) and wild-type IDH1, unmethylated MGMT and increased baseline PlGF and sVEGFR1 levels (cohort B), but tumor immune markers were not informative. The NANO scale effectively predicted neurologic function. CONCLUSIONS Although well tolerated, pembrolizumab was ineffective both as monotherapy and with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. Nonetheless, radiographic responses to combinatorial therapy were durable. Baseline dexamethasone use and plasma cytokines but not tumor immunologic biomarkers were associated with outcome. Neurologic function evaluated by the NANO scale contributed to outcome assessment.

The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) Scale as an Assessment Tool for Survival in Patients With Primary Glioblastoma.

The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale is a standardized objective metric designed to measure neurological function in neuro-oncology. Current neuroradiological evaluation guidelines fail to use specific clinical criteria for progression. To determine if the NANO scale was a reliable assessment tool in glioblastoma (GBM) patients and whether it correlated to survival. Our group performed a retrospective review of all patients with newly diagnosed GBM from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2012, at our institution. We applied the NANO scale, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale, Macdonald criteria, and the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria to patients at the time of diagnosis as well as at 3, 6, and 12 mo. Initial NANO score was correlated with overall survival at time of presentation. NANO progression was correlated with decreased survival in patients at 6 and 12 mo. A decrease in KPS was associated with survival at 3 and 6 mo, an increase in ECOG score was associated only at 3 mo, and radiological evaluation (RANO and Macdonald) was correlated at 3 and 6 mo. Only the NANO scale was associated with patient survival at 1 yr. NANO progression was the only metric that was linked to decreased overall survival when compared to RANO and Macdonald at 6 and 12 mo. The NANO scale is specific to neuro-oncology and can be used to assess patients with glioma. This retrospective analysis demonstrates the usefulness of the NANO scale in glioblastoma.

Neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale in a prospective phase II trial of anti-PD1 antibody, pembrolizumab with or without bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

2037Background: The neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale was developed as a standardized metric to objectively measure neurologic function in patients (pts) with brain tumors to com...

Corticosteroid use endpoints in neuro-oncology: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group.

Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for peritumor edema but are often associated with significant side effects. Therapies that can reduce corticosteroid use would potentially be of significant benefit to patients. However, currently there are no standardized endpoints evaluating corticosteroid use in neuro-oncology clinical trials. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group has developed consensus recommendations for endpoints evaluating corticosteroid use in clinical trials in both adults and children with brain tumors. Responders are defined as patients with a 50% reduction in total daily corticosteroid dose compared with baseline or reduction of the total daily dose to ≤2 mg of dexamethasone (or equivalent dose of other corticosteroid); baseline dose must be at least 4 mg of dexamethasone daily (or equivalent dose of other corticosteroids) for at least one week. Patients must have stable or improved Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) score or Karnofsky performance status score or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (Lansky score for children age <16 y), and an improved score on a relevant clinical outcome assessment tool. These criteria must be sustained for at least 4 weeks after baseline assessment to be considered a response, and are confirmed 4 weeks after that (ie, 8 wk after baseline assessment) to be considered a sustained response. This RANO proposal for corticosteroid use endpoints in neuro-oncology clinical trials may need to be refined and will require prospective validation in clinical studies.