NK1 Receptor Antagonist Research Articles

Comparing the efficacy of a triplet antiemetic regimen in patients with esophageal cancer patients and diabetes mellitus treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: A retrospective study.

Cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy is recommended in combination with neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA), 5-hydroxytriptamine-3-receptor antagonist (5HT3RA), dexamethasone (DEX), and olanzapine. However, olanzapine is contraindicated in patients with pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM). This study compared the efficacy of a triplet antiemetic regimen (NK1RA, 5HT3RA, and DEX) in patients with and without pre-existing DM treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. This retrospective study enrolled patients with esophageal cancer with and without pre-existing DM who received fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) combination chemotherapy as initial therapy with a triplet antiemetic regimen for antiemetic prophylaxis. This data was compared using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate during the first cycle, which was defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication use during the overall period (0-120 h). The CR rate was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, including previously reported risk factors. The significance level was set at 5%. Out of 210 eligible patients, 39 and 39 were patients with DM and non-DM patients after PSM, respectively. The CR rate measured by multivariate analysis during the overall period with DM and non-DM was 56.4% and 41.0% (adjusted odds ratio of 0.566 [95% confidence intervals: 0.209-1.536], P = 0.264), respectively. The CR rate during the delayed period (24-120 h) with DM and non-DM patients was 84.6% and 46.2% (P = 0.002), respectively. A triplet antiemetic regimen in patients with esophageal cancer with pre-existing DM might be more effective in delayed period compared to non-DM patients.

Association of Neurokinin-1 Receptor Signaling Pathways with Cancer.

Numerous biochemical reactions leading to altered cell proliferation cause tumorigenesis and cancer treatment resistance. The mechanisms implicated include genetic and epigenetic changes, modified intracellular signaling, and failure of control mechanisms caused by intrinsic and extrinsic factors alone or combined. No unique biochemical events are responsible; entangled molecular reactions conduct the resident cells in a tissue to display uncontrolled growth and abnormal migration. Copious experimental research supports the etiological responsibility of NK-1R (neurokinin-1 receptor) activation, alone or cooperating with other mechanisms, in cancer appearance in different tissues. Consequently, a profound study of this receptor system in the context of malignant processes is essential to design new treatments targeting NK-1R-deviated activity. This study reviews and discusses recent literature that analyzes the main signaling pathways influenced by the activation of neurokinin 1 full and truncated receptor variants. Also, the involvement of NK-1R in cancer development is discussed. NK-1R can signal through numerous pathways and cross-talk with other receptor systems. The participation of override or malfunctioning NK-1R in malignant processes needs a more precise definition in different types of cancers to apply satisfactory and effective treatments. A long way has already been traveled: the current disposal of selective and effective NK-1R antagonists and the capacity to develop new drugs with biased agonistic properties based on the receptor's structural states with functional significance opens immediate research action and clinical application.

Clinical benefits of adding olanzapine to 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, NK1 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug used for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. It is particularly effective in preventing delayed nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). However, it has side effects, such as hyperglycemia and somnolence, the efficacy and safety of adding olanzapine to triplet antiemetic therapy (5-HT3 receptor antagonist, NK1 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone) must be verified. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of olanzapine combined with triplet antiemetic therapy and triplet antiemetic therapy in preventing nausea and vomiting for HEC. We set five items (hyperglycemia, prevention of vomiting, prevention of nausea, adverse events, and cost (drug costs)) as outcomes and conducted a systematic review. Five randomized controlled trials was extracted and they showed that the addition of olanzapine was effective in control of nausea and vomiting, especially in the delayed phase. Complete response of acute and delayed phase were significantly higher in the olanzapine group. Risk difference was - 0.14 [95% CI - 0.26, - 0.03; p = 0.02] and - 0.14 [95% CI - 0.19, -0.09; p < 0.00001], respectively. Additionally, we evaluated hyperglycemia and somnolence, which are typical side effects of olanzapine. However, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 was low in both events, and there was no significant difference between olanzapine and control groups. Adding olanzapine to triplet antiemetic therapy is useful in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by HEC and there would be minimal adverse effects from the combination use.

Olanzapine versus neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A phase III, randomized controlled trial among patients with gynecologic malignancies receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel every three weeks

Olanzapine versus neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A phase III, randomized controlled trial among patients with gynecologic malignancies receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel every three weeks

A phase II study of ME2136 (Asenapine Maleate) plus standard antiemetic therapy for patients, including diabetic patients, receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Olanzapine combined with the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, palonosetron and dexamethasone is the standard treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) due to highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). However, the use of olanzapine poses challenges in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) due to the potential risk of hyperglycemia. ME2136, antipsychotic similar to olanzapine, is associated with a lower risk of hyperglycemia. This study investigated the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ME2136 for HEC. This single-arm phase 2 study examined the safety and efficacy of ME2136 5mg for 4days in combination with triplet-combination antiemetic therapy. Two cohorts were established for the safety assessment: DM and non-DM. Eligible patients had malignant tumors and were receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy for the first time. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate, defined as the percentage of patients without vomiting and not requiring rescue medications in the delayed phase (24-120h). Between December 2020 and January 2022, 40 patients were enrolled, with 20 in each cohort. All patients were included in the safety analysis and 35 in the efficacy analysis. The CR rate in the delayed phase was 71.4% [60% CI 63.1-78.6%] for all patients, 66.7% in the DM cohort, and 76.5% in the non-DM cohort. No treatment-related adverse events ≥ grade 3, including hyperglycemia, were reported. ME2136, when combined with standard triplet-combination antiemetic therapy, is expected to exert similar antiemetic effects to the standard treatment for CINV due to HEC. Currently, ME2136-02 trial is underway to examine the safety and efficacy of triplet-combination antiemetic therapy and a 5-day treatment with ME2136. This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2041200071) on 10 December 2020. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2041200071) on 10 December 2020.

Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting after endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapy procedures and the role of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists: a retrospective cohort study.

Both the transoral gastric reduction (TORe) and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) procedures are novel endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMT). Our practice has an aggressive approach to prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) for EBMT cases, but there is divergence of practice regarding use of prophylactic neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1) antagonists (aprepitant, fosaprepitant). Herein, we determined the incidence of PONV and its potential association with NK-1 antagonist administration following EBMT. We identified and reviewed medical records of patients who underwent EBMT between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into those administered or not administered an NK-1 antagonist. We analyzed rates of PONV, which was defined as rescue antiemetics during anesthesia recovery. A propensity score was calculated, and outcomes were assessed using generalized estimating equations with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). We identified 404 patients undergoing EBMT (256 [63%] TORe, 148 [37%] ESG), and of these 253 patients developed PONV, (62.6% [95% CI: 57.9% to 67.3%]). NK-1 antagonists were administered to 119 (29.5%) patients. PONV was experienced by 42 (35%) and 211 (74%) of patients who were or were not administered an NK-1 antagonist, respectively (IPTW OR = 0.18, [95%CI: 0.10 to 0.31], P < 0.001). EBMT has a high incidence of PONV during anesthesia recovery. Administration of a NK-1 antagonist as part of a multiagent PONV prophylaxis regimen dramatically reduces risk for this common adverse event.

Fosaprepitant improves cyclophosphamide-induced bladder damage by alleviating inflammatory response in mice

Inhibition of inflammatory process is a key therapeutic target for the treatment of interstitial cystitis (IC). Recent reports indicate that neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) antagonists have beneficial roles in inflammatory-based diseases. Herein, we investigate the protective effects of fosaprepitant (FOS), a NK1R antagonist, in cyclophosphamide (CP)-induced cystitis. The cystitis model was established multiple CP (80 mg/kg; i.p.) injection one day apart, and mice were treated with FOS (20 and 60 mg/kg/day; i.p.) for seven consecutive days. Detrusor contractility, vesical vascular permeability, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and protein expression levels of the TLR4 pathway were evaluated in mice bladder. Carbachol and electric field stimulation-evoked contractions of detrusor strips were significantly increased in CP-treated mice, which was significantly attenuated by FOS (60 mg/kg/day) treatment (p<0.001, p<0.05). Notably, vesical vascular permeability was markedly impaired in CP-induced cystitis, that was restored by FOS (60 mg/kg/day) treatment (p<0.01). MPO activity was significantly increased in cystitis group whereas FOS (20 and 60 mg/kg/day) treatment remarkably suppressed MPO activity in bladder tissue (p<0.001). Although TLR4 expression increased with cystitis, MyD88 and p-NFκBSer536/total NFκB did not change, FOS (20 and 60 mg/kg/day) treatment caused a dramatic decrease in TLR4 expression (p<0.001), indicating the anti-inflammatory effect of FOS. In conclusion, FOS improved detrusor overactivity and inflammatory response by inhibiting MPO activity and TLR4 expression, resulting in functional and histological recovery in CP-induced cystitis.

7441 KNDy Neurons and the Control of the Gonadotropic Axis in Midgestation Fetal Sheep

Abstract Disclosure: R. Amodei: None. S.S. Jonker: None. K. Gribbin: None. E. Lazen: None. C.T. Estill: None. C.E. Roselli: None. Recent evidence suggests that the neuropeptide kisspeptin (Kiss) plays a role to activate and regulate the male reproductive axis to secrete LH and testosterone during a time in gestation critical for brain sexual differentiation. KNDy neurons, an acronym for Kiss neurons that co-express neurokinin B (NKB) and dynorphin (Dyn), regulate pulsatile GnRH/LH secretion and are present in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus of midgestation sheep fetuses. Notably, KNDy neurons are more abundant in female than in male fetuses. We hypothesize that KNDy-GnRH signaling is established during midgestation and that negative feedback mediated through KNDy neurons serves to regulate levels of testosterone needed for brain masculinization. In the current study, we used immunofluorescence histochemistry to assess the effect of testosterone manipulations on the number of arcuate Kiss neurons in male and female fetuses. In addition, we employed unanesthetized cannulated midgestation fetal sheep to test the effects of KNDy peptides on LH secretion and characterize receptor specificity in a real-time physiological context. We found that biweekly administration of testosterone propionate to the dam from Day 30–58 of gestation significantly increased (P &amp;lt; 0.05) plasma testosterone concentrations, which resulted in a significant decrease (P &amp;lt; 0.05) in both mean plasma LH concentrations and the number of arcuate Kiss neurons in female lamb fetuses. Conversely, chemical castration of midgestation male fetuses by treatment with the GnRH antagonist degarelix from day 60 – 90 of gestation resulted in a significant decrease (P &amp;lt; 0.05) in mean plasma LH and testosterone concentrations that was accompanied by a significant increase (P &amp;lt; 0.05) in the number of arcuate Kiss neurons. In unanesthetized fetuses, we found that bolus administration of both KP-10 (Kiss agonist) and senktide (NKB agonist) elicited a robust release of LH within 15 min. Treatment with the NK3 receptor antagonist SB222200 effectively blocked the senktide response, whereas the Kiss1 receptor antagonist P271 appeared to have an effect in males only. Blocking κ-opiate receptor (KOR) with a bolus injection of the KOR antagonist PF4455242 resulted in a significant increase in LH release and enhanced the stimulatory effect of senktide. These results support the hypothesis that KNDy neurons play a regulatory role in GnRH and hence gonadotropin secretion in sheep fetuses and serve as targets for negative feedback in males for maintaining a stable androgen environment crucial for brain masculinization. Supported by NIH Grant OD11047 to CER. Presentation: 6/1/2024

Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone sparing for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with highly emetogenic risk antineoplastic agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are common side effects, classified according to timing and severity. Conventional agents such as dexamethasone are effective but have various side effects. For moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapies have been developed to minimize these side effects. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapy for highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). We performed a thorough literature search for studies related to dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapy with neurokinin-1 antagonists (NK1RA) for HEC using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases. A qualitative analysis of the combined data was performed and risk differences with confidence intervals were calculated. Two reviewers independently assessed the 425 records and 12 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility. Two studies were included in the qualitative and meta-analyses. These studies included anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) regimens and cisplatin-based regimens, with palonosetron as the serotonin receptor antagonist. In the two studies, no difference was found in the prevention of vomiting (delayed complete response). However, non-inferiority was not demonstrated in the subgroup that received cisplatin-containing regimens. Delayed complete control showed different results for nausea prevention; however, there was no significant difference in the meta-analysis. Only one report has shown non-inferiority for delayed total control. Although the strength of evidence for individual outcomes varied, there was no difference in the duration of dexamethasone administration. This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic therapy with NK1RA and palonosetron can be used to prevent CINV in HEC, limited to AC combination therapy.

Comparative effectiveness of netupitant-palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus aprepitant-based regimens in mitigating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Despite guidelines for managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), there remains a need to clarify the optimal use of neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists. Comparing the effectiveness of NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron) plus dexamethasone with other NK1 antagonist-based regimens combined with a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone is crucial for informed decision-making and improving patient outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to assess randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of NEPA plus dexamethasone and other NK1 antagonist-based regimens combined with a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched, with the latest update performed in December 2023. Data on patient demographics, chemotherapy regimen characteristics, and outcomes were extracted for meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Seven RCTs were analyzed. NEPA plus dexamethasone showed superior efficacy in achieving complete response in the overall (risk ratio [RR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02--1.30) and delayed phases (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.41) of chemotherapy. It was more effective in controlling nausea (overall phase RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36; delayed phase RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.40) and reducing rescue therapy use (overall phase RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07-1.95; delayed phase RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.10-2.78). Adverse event rates were comparable (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96-1.10). Subgroup analysis indicated NEPA's particular efficacy in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.60). NEPA plus dexamethasone regimens exhibit superior efficacy in preventing CINV, supporting their preferential inclusion in prophylactic treatment protocols. Its effective symptom control, safety profile, and cost-effectiveness endorse NEPA-based regimens as a beneficial option in CINV management.

Defining the clinical benefits of adding a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist to control chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for antiemesis 2023 from the Japan society of clinical oncology.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) commonly affects patient quality of life and the overall effectiveness of chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether adding neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1RAs) to 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3RAs) and corticosteroids provides clinically meaningful benefits in preventing CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web to identify clinical studies evaluating NK1RAs combined with 5-HT3RAs and dexamethasone for managing CINV in MEC. The endpoints were complete response (CR), complete control (CC), total control (TC), adverse events, and costs. The data were analyzed using a random effects model. From 142 articles identified, 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 4,405 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Approximately 60% of the patients received carboplatin (CBDCA)-based chemotherapy. The meta-analysis showed that triplet antiemetic prophylaxis with NK1RA was significantly more effective for achieving CR than doublet prophylaxis in each phase. Regarding CC, the triplet antiemetic prophylaxis was significantly more effective than the doublet in the overall (risk difference [RD]: 0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-0.17) and delayed (RD: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.02-0.13) phases. For TC, no significant differences were observed in any phase. Adding NK1RA did not cause adverse events. Adding NK1RA to CBDCA-based chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits. However, the clinical benefits of NK1RA-containing regimens for overall MEC have not yet been established and require RCTs that exclusively evaluate MEC regimens other than CBDCA-based chemotherapy.

Safety of a short-term infusion of fosnetupitant in patients with gastrointestinal and breast cancer: a prospective study.

Fosnetupitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)in patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Previous phase III trials demonstrated the non-inferiority of its 30-minute infusion to fosaprepitant in efficacy and a favorable safety profile. This was a single-arm, phase II study to investigate the safety of a 15-minute infusion of fosnetupitant in patients with gastrointestinal and breast cancer. Patients who had received their dose of fosnetupitant in a 30-minute infusion without developing an allergic reaction were eligible and received their next fosnetupitant dose for 15 minutes. The primary endpoint was the incidence of an allergic reaction during the first 15-minutes infusion, and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of injection site reaction (ISR), the incidence of a grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with fosnetupitant, and complete response (CR) rate. The study period was from February 17, 2023 to June 20, 2023. In an exploratory analysis, medical records from the end of the study period to December 31, 2023 were retrospectively evaluated to assess the time-saving effect and safety of the short-term infusion of fosnetupitant. Fifty-six patients with gastrointestinal and 14 patients with breast cancer were enrolled, one of whom with breast cancer did not receive study treatment at her own request. No allergic reactions occurred during the 15-minutes infusion. Furthermore, there were no allergic reactions across all 280 short-term injections (Table 1). Additionally, no ISR or grade 3 or higher TRAE were reported. The CR rate was 87.0%. Short-term infusion of fosnetupitant, administered over 15 minutes, was demonstrated to be safe and effective for patients receiving HEC or MEC (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Trial ID: jRCT1041220144).

Comparison of the effects of Aprepitant and Granisetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common findings in the first 24 hours after surgery, occurring in 30% of all patients and up to 80% of high-risk patients. We compared aprepitant (a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) and granisetron in preventing PONV in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: Sixty-one patients (aged 18-90) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II class who underwent LC under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. Our study aimed to compare the incidence of PONV between 0-6, 6-12, and 6-24 hours postoperatively and the need for additional antiemetic requirements primarily and, secondly, detecting VAS scores and additional analgesic requirements for aprepitant and granisetron. Results: Our study observed similar PONV changes in both groups at 0-6 hours. A significantly lower VDS was observed in group A at 30-60 minutes compared to group G (p=0.10). There was no significant difference between groups at other intervals until the 120th minute. Between 6 and 12 hours, Group A had a lower VDS (Verbal Descriptive Scale) than Group G, but there was no statistically significant difference (P&gt;0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding VAS scores, additional analgesic requirements, and adverse effects on patients (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: We observed that aprepitant may be more effective than granisetron in preventing PONV and can be used safely in patients undergoing LC.

Neurokinin receptor antagonists as potential nonhormone treatments for vasomotor symptoms.

Managing menopause symptoms is challenging for women unable or unwilling to take hormone therapy. All nonhormone options thus far have shown less overall efficacy compared with hormone therapy and significant adverse events that limit their use. New science has identified the source of vasomotor symptoms, achieving relief of these bothersome symptoms by directly targeting the neurokinin 3 receptor and its related pathways. This Practice Pearl reviews the clinical data available on neurokinin receptor antagonists.

Acute care of cyclic vomiting syndrome and cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome in the home and emergency department for: Special supplement/proceedings of 3rd international symposium.

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) and cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) are both characterized by episodic, acute transitions from asymptomatic states to highly symptomatic states of nausea, repetitive vomiting, and often severe abdominal pain. Patients with CVS and CHS face significant challenges to abort or mitigate episodes at home and often require emergency department (ED)-based care. This paper reviews the current treatment approach to abort acute CVS and CHS episodes at home and in ED settings. Multiple pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions have been demonstrated to potentially abort CVS or CHS episodes. Systemic pharmacologic agents often used as abortive therapy include triptans, antiemetics, anxiolytics, NK-1 receptor antagonists, antipsychotics, sedatives in general, and various analgesic / anti-inflammatory medications. Nonsystemic, nonpharmacologic approaches include reducing external stimuli (quiet room, dim lights, etc.), and hot water bathing or the application of topical capsaicin cream. More research is needed to develop evidence-based, individualized abortive treatment plans, as well as to determine whether the abortive treatment for CVS requires a fundamentally different approach than for CHS. When home-based approaches fail, all patients with CVS or CHS should receive nonjudgmental, informed, and compassionate care in the ED to abort their episode. Patients with more severe forms of CVS/CHS who require more frequent ED utilization should develop care plans with their ED to assure predictable and effective treatment.

Comparison of aprepitant versus ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication after surgery. Preventing PONV in high-risk patients often requires a multimodal approach combining antiemetic drugs with diverse mechanisms. While aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is recognised as highly effective for PONV prevention, uncertainties remain regarding its effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The analysis assessed the effectiveness of aprepitant (A), aprepitant plus ondansetron (AO) and aprepitant plus dexamethasone and ondansetron (ADO) in preventing PONV compared to ondansetron alone (O) or in combination with dexamethasone (DO). In the analysis of 12 studies involving 2729 patients, aprepitant demonstrated significant efficacy in preventing PONV compared to ondansetron alone (A versus [vs.] O: PONV incidence 12.5% vs. 28.5%, relative risk [RR] = 0.45, P < 0.001; complete response rate 55.97% vs. 50.35%, RR = 1.13, P = 0.010). The combination of aprepitant with ondansetron (AO) also showed a significantly lower incidence of PONV compared to ondansetron alone (11.3% vs. 26.8%, RR = 0.43, P < 0.001) and a higher complete response rate (38.1% vs. 26.84%, RR = 1.41, P = 0.020). In addition, ADO significantly reduced PONV incidence compared to DO (ADO vs. DO: 13.63% vs. 35.38%, RR = 0.38, P = 0.006). Aprepitant, whether used alone or in combination with ondansetron or both ondansetron and dexamethasone, consistently outperforms ondansetron in achieving a complete response as it lowers vomiting rates and reduces the need for rescue therapy during the crucial 24-48-h postoperative period.

Oral Cannabis Extract for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II/III Trial.

The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, two-stage, phase II/III trial was to determine the efficacy of an oral cannabis extract in adults with refractory nausea and/or vomiting during moderately or highly emetogenic, intravenous chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis. Here, we report results of the prespecified combined analysis including the initial phase II and subsequent phase III components. Study treatment consisted of oral capsules containing either tetrahydrocannabinol 2.5 mg plus cannabidiol 2.5 mg capsules (THC:CBD) or matching placebo, taken three times a day from days -1 to 5, in addition to guideline-consistent antiemetics. The primary measure of effect was the difference in the proportions of participants with no vomiting or retching and no use of rescue medications (a complete response) during hours 0-120 after the first cycle of chemotherapy on study (cycle A). We recruited 147 evaluable of a planned 250 participants from 2016 to 2022. Background antiemetic prophylaxis included a corticosteroid and 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist in 97%, a neurokinin-1 antagonist in 80%, and olanzapine in 10%. THC:CBD compared with placebo improved the complete response rate from 8% to 24% (absolute difference 16%, 95% CI, 4 to 28, P = .01), with similar effects for absence of significant nausea, use of rescue medications, daily vomits, and the nausea scale on the Functional Living Index-Emesis quality-of-life questionnaire. More frequent bothersome adverse events of special interest included sedation (18% v 7%), dizziness (10% v 0%), and transient anxiety (4% v 1%). There were no serious adverse events attributed to THC:CBD. THC:CBD is an effective adjunct for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting despite standard antiemetic prophylaxis, but was associated with additional adverse events. Drug availability, cultural attitudes, legal status, and preferences may affect implementation. Future analyses will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of THC:CBD.

Olanzapine as Antiemetic Prophylaxis in Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy

The role of olanzapine has not been adequately evaluated in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens with or without neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists. To evaluate whether addition of olanzapine to an MEC regimen reduces nausea, vomiting, and use of nausea rescue medications among patients with solid malignant tumors. This multicenter, open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial included patients aged 18 years or older with solid malignant tumors who were receiving oxaliplatin-, carboplatin-, or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The trial was conducted at 3 institutes in India from March 26, 2019, to August 26, 2023; the final cutoff date for analysis was September 10, 2023. Patients were randomized 1:1 to dexamethasone, aprepitant, and palonosetron with olanzapine (experimental group) or without olanzapine (observation group). The experimental group received 10 mg of olanzapine orally once at night on days 1 through 3 of the chemotherapy regimen. The primary end point was complete response (CR), defined as the proportion of patients with no vomiting, no significant nausea (scored as <5 on a visual analog scale of 1 to 100), and no use of rescue medications for nausea. Secondary end points included the proportion of patients experiencing nausea and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), receiving rescue medications, and experiencing adverse events. A total of 560 patients (259 [64%] male; median age, 51 years [range, 19-80 years]) were randomized. The analysis included 544 patients with evaluable data (274 assigned to olanzapine and 270 to observation). Baseline characteristics were evenly matched between the 2 groups. The proportion of patients with CR was significantly greater in the group with (248 [91%]) than without (222 [82%]) olanzapine in the overall 120-hour treatment period (P = .005). Likewise, there were significant differences between the olanzapine and observation groups for nausea control (264 [96%] vs 234 [87%]; P < .001) and CINV (262 [96%] vs 245 [91%]; P = .02) during the overall assessment period, and the proportion of patients receiving rescue medications significantly increased in the observation group (30 [11%]) compared with the olanzapine group (11 [4%]) (P = .001). Grade 1 somnolence was reported by 27 patients (10%) following administration of chemotherapy and olanzapine and by no patients in the observation group. In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of olanzapine significantly improved CR rates as well as nausea and vomiting prevention rates in chemotherapy-naive patients who were receiving MEC regimens containing oxaliplatin, carboplatin, or irinotecan. These findings suggest that use of olanzapine should be considered as one of the standards of care in these chemotherapy regimens. Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI) Identifier: CTRI/2018/12/016643.

Adequate antiemetic treatment in patients receiving antitumor drug therapy

Despite the widespread use of immuno-oncological and targeted therapy in the treatment of malignant tumors, in real clinical practice the role of chemotherapy is still significant, used both in mono regimen and in combination with other antitumor drugs. Cytostatics cause a wide range of adverse events, which are often the cause of dose reduction, cyclical disorders, or even discontinuation of therapy. One of the most common symptoms is chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting which affect not only the quality of life, but also the results of treatment. It is important to address these issues from prevention and treatment perspectives so that patients remain committed to their treatment regimens. Since nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy are classified into 5 different types, the main medications for prevention and treatment include 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) and neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists and corticosteroids. Simultaneous use of drugs from the groups of second-generation NK1 receptor blockers and 5-HT3 receptor blockers, for example: netupitant + palonosetron in combination with corticosteroids, makes it possible to achieve maximum antiemetic effect, even with the most emetogenic antitumor treatment regimens.

Safety assessment of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.

Aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant are three common neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1RAs) used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, following highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Understanding their different adverse event (AE) profiles may help clinicians make appropriate treatment decisions. All data collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 underwent disproportionality analysis to detect, evaluate, and compare AE signals of the three NK-1RAs. A total of 3,904, 1,123, and 243 AE reports related to aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant, respectively, were extracted from the FAERS database. Of these, more than 50% of respondents were female, and most of them were aged 45-65years. General disorders and administration-site conditions, and gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequent signals in the system organ class of the three NK-1RA drugs. In addition, aprepitant was strongly associated with joint deposit (ROR = 26.27) and fosaprepitant was closely related to seizure-like phenomena (ROR = 26.90); two preferred terms (PTs) were not mentioned in the manual. Statistically, netupitant was likely to induce death (N = 63, ROR = 8.78, 95% CI: 6.75-11.42). Additionally, neutropenic colitis, colitis, and stomatitis were unique to netupitant. Furthermore, the AE profiles of the three NK-1RA drugs were different by gender. The AE profiles for aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant were different. In addition to paying attention to common AEs, clinicians need to pay attention to new emerging AEs, such as joint deposit, seizure-like phenomena, neutropenic colitis, colitis, and stomatitis, regarding the three NK-1RA drugs. Furthermore, the AE compositions of the three NK-1RA drugs were different in different genders, and clinicians should take these factors into account when selecting NK-1RAs for CINV treatment.