<h3>Objective:</h3> To use qualitative interviews to elucidate seemingly discordant quantitative ratings in patient reported outcomes for quality of life (QOL). <h3>Background:</h3> Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) is a progressive, neurogenetic disease. Assessing QOL is important in demonstrating that new drugs improve how NF2 patients feel and function. The NFTI-QOL is the currently recommended measure to assess NF2-specific QOL in clinical trials. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> We interviewed 16 participants enrolled in stage one of the brigatinib arm of INTUITT-NF2 (NCT04374305) –a multicenter, adaptive platform-basket trial targeting progressive NF2-related tumors – after one year of treatment or at time of trial discontinuation. Interviews included cognitive debriefings of the NFTI-QoL and global impression of change (GIC) scale. We also analyzed NFTI-QoL scores collected over the same time period, using a MCID of ±2 points to classify improvement or worsening in QOL. <h3>Results:</h3> 11/16 (69%) participants reported a GIC rating discordant with their change in NFTI-QoL scores. 8/13 (62%) of participants who improved on their GIC had stable (N=6) or worsened (N=2) NFTI-QoL scores. This group cited tumor stability as a major contributor to improved GIC ratings and also had lower baseline NFTI-QoL scores (median=8) than those with concordant ratings (median=12). Participants with lower NFTI-QoL scores disproportionally reported that a meaningful improvement in their symptoms would not lead to an accompanying score improvement due to inadequate NFTI-QOL response options. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Qualitative interviews revealed two reasons for conflicting patient reported outcome results. In the setting of a progressive disease, participants can view tumor volume stability as an improvement, even with stable or worsening symptoms. Also, the NFTI-QoL may not be capturing improvement in people with a lower symptom burden. In order for the NFTI-QoL and GIC to better reflect changes in NF2 patients QOL, we recommend adding another response option to the NFTI-QoL and altering the instructions of the GIC. <b>Disclosure:</b> Ms. Von Imhof has nothing to disclose. Dr. Plotkin has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for NFlection Therapeutics. Dr. Plotkin has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Akouos. Dr. Plotkin has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for SonALAsense. Dr. Plotkin has stock in NFlection Therapeutics. Dr. Plotkin has stock in NF2 Therapeutics. Dr. Plotkin has stock in SonALAsense. Dr. Plotkin has received research support from Children’s Tumor Foundation. Dr. Plotkin has received research support from Department of Defense. Dr. Plotkin has received research support from National Institutes of Health. Dr. Plotkin has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care. Dr. Yohay has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Astra Zeneca. Dr. Yohay has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. An immediate family member of Dr. Yohay has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from Erasca. Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from Springswork. Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from Children’s Tumor Foundation. Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from NIH-NCI . Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from Genentech. Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from DOD. Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from Millenium. Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from GCAR. Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from Novartis. Dr. Nghiemphu has received research support from BMS. Dr. Nghiemphu has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a advisory board with Alexion. Dr. Babovic-Vuksanovic has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of AstraZeneka. Dr. Babovic-Vuksanovic has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Alexion. Dr. Babovic-Vuksanovic has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for AstraZeneca. Dr. Babovic-Vuksanovic has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Alexion. Dr. Babovic-Vuksanovic has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for AstraZeneca . Dr. Babovic-Vuksanovic has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Loeb&Loeb. The institution of Dr. Babovic-Vuksanovic has received research support from DOD. Dr. Babovic-Vuksanovic has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. The institution of Vanessa Merker has received research support from Children’s tumor foundation . The institution of Vanessa Merker has received research support from NF Northeast. Vanessa Merker has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a science writer with Neurofibromatosis Network.
Read full abstract