Neurocognitive Events Research Articles

Adverse events in men with advanced prostate cancer treated with androgen biosynthesis inhibitors and androgen receptor inhibitors.

The use of androgen biosynthesis and second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors for advanced prostate cancer is increasing. Because these therapies alter the androgen pathway, they have been associated with cardiometabolic and neurocognitive toxicities. Although their safety profiles have been assessed in clinical trials, real-world data are limited. A 20% sample of national Medicare claims was used to perform a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with advanced prostate cancer treated with androgen biosynthesis (ie, abiraterone) and second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors between 2012 and 2019. Outcomes were assessed after the first fill of either class of drug for the 12-month period after starting therapy. The primary outcome was a hospital admission or emergency department visit for a cardiometabolic event. Secondary outcomes included neurocognitive events and fractures. Multivariable regression was used to assess the association between the class of drug and occurrence of an adverse event. There were 3488 (60%) men started on an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor and 2361 (40%) started on an androgen receptor inhibitor for the first time. Cardiometabolic adverse events were more common in men managed with androgen biosynthesis inhibitor (9.2% vs 7.5%, P = .027). No difference between androgen biosynthesis and androgen receptor inhibitors was observed for neurocognitive events (3.3% vs 3.4%, respectively; P = .71) or fractures (4.2% vs 3.6%, respectively; P = .26). Men with advanced prostate cancer initiating an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor for the first time more commonly had cardiometabolic events than those started on androgen receptor inhibitors. Neurocognitive events and fractures did not differ by drug class.

Neurocognitive Adverse Events Related to Lorlatinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lorlatinib has been FDA-approved as a systemic therapy for ALK/ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, it has been associated with an increased frequency of neurocognitive adverse events (NAEs). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the NAEs related to lorlatinib therapy in NSCLC patients. PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and prominent conference proceedings were searched for eligible studies of lorlatinib in NSCLC patients. NAEs included cognitive, mood, speech, and psychotic effects. A total of 1147 patients from 12 studies were included; 62% had brain metastases. A pooled analysis of NAEs showed frequencies of cognitive effects of 14.57% (95% CI, 8.37 to 24.14, I2 = 84%), mood effects of 11.17% (95% CI, 5.93 to 20.07, I2 = 84%), speech effects of 7.24% (95% CI, 3.39 to 15.20, I2 = 72%), and psychotic effects of 4.97% (95% CI, 3.27 to 7.49, I2 = 21%). Clinical trials reported a significantly higher frequency of mood effects than was indicated by real-world data. These results highlight the importance of educating patients and healthcare professionals about lorlatinib-related NAEs for early detection and management to improve NSCLC patients' quality of life.

In-depth Analysis of Lorlatinib-related neurocognitive Adverse Events in Patients With Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionLorlatinib is a potent, brain penetrant, next-generation ALK/ROS1 TKI, with high response rates and durable responses, including the brain. However, a significant drawback is the manifestation of neurocognitive adverse events (NCAEs). Despite being generally low-grade in severity, these NCAEs can be physically and mentally disabling. Extensive neurocognitive testing in this group of patients is lacking; therefore we conducted this study. Patients and methodsThis observational prospective study was conducted across 3 Dutch university hospitals. Patients with metastatic NSCLC with an ALK- or ROS1-rearrangement and having an indication to start lorlatinib in daily clinical practice were eligible. The primary endpoints were to identify changes in neurocognitive functioning, measured through neurocognitive assessment at intervals of 2 weeks and 2 months after starting lorlatinib, in comparison to baseline. As a secondary endpoint, the correlation between neurocognitive impairment and self-reported neurocognitive dysfunction was examined. ResultsBetween June 2019 and October 2022, 22 patients were included. Among the various neurocognitive tests administered, only the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised parts b and c demonstrated a significant and clinically relevant decrease in scoring 2 weeks post initiation of lorlatinib (P = .036 and P = .003, respectively). However, these returned to baseline at the 2-month evaluation. The questionnaires did not result in significantly different outcomes over time. ConclusionLorlatinib treatment did not result in a sustained and significant decline within any of the specified neurocognitive domains.

The Phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 Trial: Updated Efficacy and Safety of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and 1-3 Prior Lines of Therapy (Cohort A) and with Early Relapse after First Line Treatment (Cohort B)

Introduction: CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) is a phase 2, multicohort study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), an anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, in various populations of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We previously reported 17-month median follow-up results from cohort A (1-3 prior lines of therapy [LOT] and lenalidomide [len]-refractory) and 18-month median follow-up results from cohort B (early relapse: ≤12 months after either autologous stem cell transplant [ASCT] or start of initial anti-myeloma treatment, if not transplanted). Cilta-cel is also under evaluation in patients with len-refractory MM after 1-3 LOT in the phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 study, which showed cilta-cel significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs standard of care (HR, 0.26) at a median follow-up of 16 months. Here, we present updated efficacy and safety data from CARTITUDE-2 cohorts A and B, both with a median follow-up of ~29 months. Methods: Patients in cohorts A and B, all naive to CAR-T and/or anti-BCMA therapies, received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×10 6 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) 5-7 days after lymphodepletion. In both cohorts, the primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity (10 -5 threshold, by next-generation sequencing or next-generation flow cytometry). Management strategies were implemented after the phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study to reduce risk of movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (MNTs). Results: As of April 2023, 20 patients in cohort A had received cilta-cel (median follow-up, 29.9 months; 35% with high-risk cytogenetics; median 2 prior LOT; 95% refractory to last LOT; 40% triple-class refractory; 85% with prior ASCT). At the same data cut-off, 19 patients in cohort B hadreceived cilta-cel (median follow-up, 27.9 months; 16% with high-risk cytogenetics; 79% refractory to last LOT; 16% triple-class refractory; 79% with prior ASCT). All (100%) 17 MRD-evaluable patients in cohort A and 14 (93%) of 15 MRD-evaluable patients in cohort B achieved MRD negativity (10 -5 threshold). Eight (40%) of 20 patients in cohort A and 10 (53%) of 19 patients in cohort B sustained MRD negativity at 10 -5 for ≥6 months (Table 1). In the 20 patients in cohort A and 19 in cohort B, cilta-cel led to overall response rates of 95% (complete response or better [≥CR], 90%) and 100% (≥CR, 90%), respectively. Median PFS was not reached in either cohort, and 24-month PFS rates were 75% in cohort A and 73% in cohort B; respective 24-month overall survival rates were 75% and 84%. In cohort A, hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring between 17.1- and 29.9-month median follow-up included maximum grade (gr) 3/4 leukopenia in 1 patient (all gr,12 total; 60%), maximum gr 3/4 lymphopenia in 2 patients (all gr,16 total; 80%), and maximum gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient (all gr,16 total; 80%). In cohort B, no new patients reported hematologic TEAEs between 18.0- and 27.9-month median follow-up (Table 2). In cohort A, no new patients had CAR-T cell neurotoxicity, and no patients had a second primary malignancy (SPM). In cohort B, no new patients had MNTs, but other neurotoxicity (gr 2 sensory loss) occurred in 1 additional patient (all gr, 5 total; 26%) and resolved; and SPM (gr 4 choroid melanoma) occurred in 1 additional patient (all gr, 2 total; 11%). One new death (total 5) occurred in cohort A on day 666 due to progressive disease, and 1 new death (total 4) occurred in cohort B on day 749 due to cardiac arrest (not treatment related). Conclusions: These longer-term follow-up data show that patients treated with cilta-cel in earlier LOT, both those with len-refractory MM after 1-3 LOT (cohort A) and those with early relapse (cohort B), experienced deep and durable responses. No new CAR-T-related safety signals, except for 1 additional CAR-T cell neurotoxicity in cohort B, were reported. Cohort A provides insight into potential longer-term survival outcomes that may be expected in the phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 trial, which enrolled the same patient population but has shorter follow-up thus far. The long-term cohort B data highlight the durable efficacy of cilta-cel in patients who had early relapse; this is a functionally high-risk population for whom standard risk factors, including a high-risk cytogenetic profile, may not predict risk of relapse and for whom there is significant unmet need.

1365P Neurocognitive adverse events related to lorlatinib in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

1365P Neurocognitive adverse events related to lorlatinib in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Propensity score-matched analysis comparing hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous integrated boost with hippocampus‑avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy alone for multiple brain metastases-a retrospective study in multiple institutions

BackgroundThe optimal treatment for multiple brain metastases has been recently controversially discussed.This study was aimed to explore the feasibility of Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy plus a simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT + SIB) in patients with multiple brain metastases and assess tumor control in comparison with Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) alone for brain metastases.MethodsIn this study, 63 patients with multiple brain metastases (≥ 4 metastases) had undergone HA-WBRT + SIB between January 2016 and December 2020 in the observation group:HA-WBRT (30 Gy in 12 fractions, the maximum dose of the hippocampus ≤ 14 Gy) plus a simultaneous integrated boost (48 Gy in 12 fractions) for brain metastases.Overall Survival (OS), Median survival,intracranial control (IC = control within the entire brain), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and adverse events were compared with the control group (a HA-WBRT retrospective cohort) by propensity score matching analysis.ResultsAfter 1:1 propensity score matching,there were 56 patients in each group (the observation group, the control group). OS, median survival and iPFS were significantly longer in the observation group (18.4 vs. 10.9 months, P<0.001), (13.0 vs. 8.0 months, P<0.001), (13.9 vs.7.8 months, P<0.001). In comparison of 1-year-IC rates, the observation group also demonstrated higher than the control group (51.8% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.002), respectively. Seven hippocampal metastases were found in the control group (4/56,7.1%) and the observation group (3/56,5.4%) after HA-WBRT. The death rate of intracranial progression were 23.2% in the observation group and 37.5% in the control group.All adverse events were not significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsHA-WBRT + SIB resulted in better OS,median survival, IC, iPFS, an acceptable risk of radiation response, and a potential way of declining neurocognitive adverse events, which may be a better treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases.

PRO: Do We Still Need Whole-Brain Irradiation for Brain Metastases?

(1) Background: In recent decades, the use of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of brain metastases has significantly decreased, with clinicians fearing adverse neurocognitive events and data showing limited efficacy regarding local tumor control and overall survival. The present study thus aimed to reassess the role that WBRT holds in the treatment of brain metastases. (2) Methods: This review summarizes the available evidence from 1990 until today supporting the use of WBRT, as well as new developments in WBRT and their clinical implications. (3) Results: While one to four brain metastases should be exclusively treated with radiosurgery, WBRT does remain an option for patients with multiple metastases. In particular, hippocampus-avoidance WBRT, WBRT with dose escalation to the metastases, and their combination have shown promising results and offer valid alternatives to local stereotactic radiotherapy. Ongoing and published prospective trials on the efficacy and toxicity of these new methods are presented. (4) Conclusions: Unlike conventional WBRT, which has limited indications, modern WBRT techniques continue to have a significant role to play in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. In which situations radiosurgery or WBRT should be the first option should be investigated in further studies. Until then, the therapeutic decision must be made individually depending on the oncological context.

Individualized approach to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor dosing in cystic fibrosis, in response to self-reported anxiety and neurocognitive adverse events: A case series.

The prevalence of mental health disorders is high among people with Cystic Fibrosis. The psychological symptoms in CF are associated with poor adherence, worse treatment outcomes, and greater health utilization/cost. Mental health and neurocognitive Adverse Events (AEs) have been reported with all available Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) modulators in small groups of patients. We report our experience with a dose reduction strategy in 10 of our patients on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (7.9% of total number of patients) who self-reported developing intense anxiety, irritability, sleep disturbance and/or mental slowness after initiation of full dose treatment. Standard dose elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor resulted in 14.3 points improvement in mean Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1s (ppFEV1), and a mean difference in sweat chloride of -39.3mmol/L. We initially discontinued and/or reduced therapy according to the AEs severity, with a subsequent planned dose escalation every 4-6weeks guided by sustainability of clinical effectiveness, absence of AEs recurrence, and patients' preferences. Clinical parameters including lung function and sweat chloride were monitored for up to 12weeks to assess ongoing clinical response to the reduced dose regimen. Dose reduction resulted in resolution of self-reported mental/psychological AEs, without loss of clinical effectiveness (ppFEV1 was 80.7% on standard dose, and 83.4% at 12weeks on reduced dose; sweat chloride was 33.4 and 34mmol/L on standard and reduced dose, respectively). Furthermore, in a subgroup of patients who completed 24weeks of the reduced dose regimen, repeat low dose Computed Tomography imaging showed a significant response when compared to pre-initiation of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.

Association Between Achieved Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Long-Term Cardiovascular and Safety Outcomes: An Analysis of FOURIER-OLE.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the optimal achieved LDL-C level with regard to efficacy and safety in the long term remains unknown. In FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk), 27 564 patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomized to evolocumab versus placebo, with a median follow-up of 2.2 years. In the open-label extension (FOURIER-OLE), 6635 of these patients were transitioned to open-label evolocumab regardless of initial treatment allocation in the parent trial and were followed for an additional median of 5 years. In this prespecified analysis, we examined the relationship between achieved LDL-C levels (an average of the first 2 LDL-C levels measured) in FOURIER-OLE (available in 6559 patients) and the incidence of subsequent cardiovascular and safety outcomes. We also performed sensitivity analyses evaluating cardiovascular and safety outcomes in the entire FOURIER and FOURIER-OLE patient population. Multivariable modeling was used to adjust for baseline factors associated with achieved LDL-C levels. In FOURIER-OLE, 1604 (24%), 2627 (40%), 1031 (16%), 486 (7%), and 811 (12%) patients achieved LDL-C levels of <20, 20 to <40, 40 to <55, 55 to <70, and ≥70 mg/dL, respectively. There was a monotonic relationship between lower achieved LDL-C levels-down to very low levels <20 mg/dL-and a lower risk of the primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospital admission for unstable angina or coronary revascularization) and the key secondary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) that persisted after multivariable adjustment (adjusted Ptrend<0.0001 for each end points). No statistically significant associations existed in the primary analyses between lower achieved LDL-C levels and increased risk of the safety outcomes (serious adverse events, new or recurrent cancer, cataract-related adverse events, hemorrhagic stroke, new-onset diabetes, neurocognitive adverse events, muscle-related events, or noncardiovascular death). Similar findings were noted in the entire FOURIER and FOURIER-OLE cohort up to a maximum follow-up of 8.6 years. In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, long-term achievement of lower LDL-C levels, down to <20 mg/dL (<0.5 mmol/L), was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes with no significant safety concerns. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifier: NCT01764633.

An Updated Meta-Analysis for Safety Evaluation of Alirocumab and Evolocumab as PCSK9 Inhibitors.

Alirocumab and evolocumab, as protein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, have been reported to reduce cardiovascular risk. This meta-analysis is aimed at updating the safety data of PCSK9 inhibitors. We assessed the relative risk for all treatment-related adverse events, serious adverse events, diabetes-related adverse events, and neurocognitive and neurologic adverse events with PCSK9 inhibitors compared to controls (placebo or ezetimibe). In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively integrate and estimate the adverse event rates in long-term studies. There were no significant differences between PCSK9 inhibitors and controls in the relative risk analysis. In a subgroup analysis of each PCSK9 inhibitor, alirocumab treatment significantly reduced the risk of serious adverse events compared to control treatment (risk ratio (RR) = 0.937; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.896-0.980), but no significant difference was observed with evolocumab treatment (RR = 1.003; 95% CI, 0.963-1.054). Moreover, alirocumab treatment afforded a significant reduction in the risk of diabetes-related adverse events compared to control treatment (RR = 0.9137; 95% CI, 0.845-0.987). The overall incidence (event rate) of long-term adverse events was 75.1% (95% CI, 71.2%-78.7%), and the incidence of serious long-term event rate was 16.2% (95% CI, 11.6%-22.3%). We suggest that alirocumab and evolocumab are generally safe and well tolerated and that their addition to background lipid-lowering therapy is not associated with an increased risk of adverse events or toxicity.

Longer-term safety of alirocumab with 24,610 patient-years of placebo-controlled observation: further insights from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial

Abstract Background In the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (NCT01663402), alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from ∼2.3 mmol/L to ∼1.0 mmol/L at 4 months, reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal/nonfatal ischemic stroke, unstable angina requiring hospitalization), and was associated with fewer deaths compared with placebo in 18924 patients (pts) with recent acute coronary syndrome followed for up to 5 years (yrs). Purpose In the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial, the overall safety of alirocumab and placebo was similar, except for an excess of local injection-site reactions with alirocumab. However, the safety among pts eligible for longer follow-up has not been fully explored. Methods The present post hoc analyses describe the efficacy and safety of alirocumab in a pre-specified subgroup (for efficacy) of pts eligible for a minimum of 3 and up to 5 yrs of follow-up. Results There were 8242 pts (43.5%) eligible for ≥3 yrs follow-up, of whom 8228 received at least one dose of study medication, comprising 24,610 pt-years of observation with a median follow-up of 3.3 yrs; 6651 pts were eligible for 3 up to 4 yrs, and 1574 patients were eligible for 4–5 yrs, follow-up. As previously reported in a pre-specified analysis of this subgroup, alirocumab significantly reduced death (4.7% vs. 5.9%; p=0.01) compared with placebo. In the present post hoc analysis, alirocumab also significantly reduced MACE vs. placebo (12.0% vs. 14.2%; Hazard Ratio 0.83 [95% CI 0.74 to 0.94]; p=0.003). In a safety analysis, 3217 (78.3%) vs. 3303 (80.2%) pts in the alirocumab vs. placebo group had at least one adverse event (AE) of whom 27.5% vs. 29.4% had a serious AE (Fig. 1). The frequency of permanent discontinuation of study drug due to AEs, incident diabetes, diabetes worsening or complications, neurocognitive events, elevations of ALT&amp;gt;3, AST&amp;gt;3, bilirubin&amp;gt;2, and creatine phosphokinase&amp;gt;10 times the upper limit of normal, were similar with alirocumab vs. placebo (Fig. 1). While pt-reported local injection-site reactions occurred more frequently with alirocumab, the Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence for time to first local injection site reaction in the longer-term follow-up subgroup was &amp;lt;5% over ∼4 yrs, with most occurring within the first 6 months (Fig. 2). Conclusions In an 8228-pt subgroup of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial eligible for at least 3, and up to 5 yrs follow-up, the safety of alirocumab was similar to placebo except for an excess of local injection site reactions. This subgroup also derived significant benefit from reduced MACE and death. Thus, alirocumab appears to be both a safe and effective lipid-modifying treatment when used for up to 5 yrs. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Sanofi and Regeneron

MM-181 CARTITUDE-1: Two-Year Post Last Patient in (LPI) Results From the Phase 1b/2 Study of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (Cilta-Cel), a B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) Cell Therapy, in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Cilta-cel, a CAR-T cell therapy with 2 BCMA-targeting single-domain antibodies, led to early, deep, and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM in the phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study (NCT03548207). To report updated results from CARTITUDE-1. Data 2-years post LPI (~30-month median follow-up [MFU]) will be presented; here we report results at 21.7-month MFU. Eligible patients with RRMM had ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) or were refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and had received a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 antibody. After apheresis, bridging therapy was allowed. A single infusion of cilta-cel (target dose 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was administered 5-7 days after lymphodepletion. Cilta-cel safety and efficacy were the primary objectives. Assessments included response (per IMWG criteria by independent review committee) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (at 10-5 by next-generation sequencing). As of July 22, 2021, 97 patients (59% male; median age 61 years; median 6 [range 3-18] prior LOT) received cilta-cel. Overall response rate was 97.9% (94.9% very good partial response; 82.5% stringent complete response). Median times to first response, best response, and ≥complete response were 1.0, 2.6, and 2.9 months, respectively. Median duration of response was not reached. Among 61 MRD-evaluable patients, 92% were MRD negative (10-5), sustained for ≥6 months in 44% and ≥12 months in 18%. Progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years was 60.5%. Median PFS and overall survival were not reached. PFS rates at 2 years in patients with MRD negativity sustained for ≥6 months and ≥12 months were 91% and 100%, respectively. No new safety signals, new events of CAR-T cell neurotoxicity, movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events, or treatment-related deaths have occurred since 1-year MFU. Over ~2 years MFU, 15 second, primary malignancies were reported in 11 patients. At ~2 years MFU, a single infusion of cilta-cel resulted in deepening and durable responses and manageable safety in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM. Additional research is ongoing to evaluate cilta-cel in earlier LOT and outpatient settings across the CARTITUDE program (NCT04133636, NCT04181827, NCT04923893).

Factors Associated With Developing Neurocognitive Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Lorlatinib After Progression on Other Targeted Therapies

IntroductionThe safety profile of lorlatinib includes neurocognitive adverse events (NAEs). Baseline factors associated with developing NAEs remain poorly characterized. MethodsRecords from patients who received lorlatinib through prospective studies at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH, n = 124) or the phase 1/2 B7461001 (NCT01970865; n = 248) study were reviewed to identify potential associations between comorbidities, baseline medications, and NAEs. ResultsMost patients experienced a NAE (MGH: 60%, B7461001: 49%). Cognitive effects occurred in 40% and 29% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. Brain metastases (p = 0.008), brain radiation (p = 0.033), psychiatric illness (p = 0.008), psychiatric medications (p < 0.001), antiepileptics (p < 0.001), and stimulants (p = 0.026) were associated with developing cognitive effects in B7461001. Mood effects occurred in 36% and 23% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. In the MGH cohort, psychiatric illness (p = 0.02) and stimulants (p = 0.01) were associated with developing mood effects whereas brain surgery (p = 0.020), psychiatric medications (p < 0.001), benzodiazepines (p = 0.002), and sedatives (p = 0.034) were associated with developing mood effects in B7461001. Psychotic effects were infrequent (MGH: 3%, B7461001: 9%) and were associated with brain surgery in the MGH cohort (p = 0.001) and age in B7461001 (p = 0.014). Speech effects were observed in 23% and 11% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. Brain radiation (p = 0.012) and antiepileptics (p < 0.001) were associated with speech effects in B7461001. Dose reductions were implemented for 52% and 18% of patients with NAEs in MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively, with mitigating effect. ConclusionsNeurocognitive effects from lorlatinib are common. Lorlatinib-related NAEs may be influenced by multiple factors, including brain metastases, brain radiation, psychiatric illness, and use of neurotropic medications.

Long-Term Evolocumab in Patients With Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

In FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk), the proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitor evolocumab reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and risk of cardiovascular events and was safe and well tolerated over a median of 2.2 years of follow-up. However, large-scale, long-term data are lacking. The parent FOURIER trial randomized 27 564 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL on statin to evolocumab versus placebo. Patients completing FOURIER at participating sites were eligible to receive evolocumab in 2 open-label extension studies (FOURIER-OLE [FOURIER Open-Label Extension]) in the United States and Europe; primary analyses were pooled across studies. The primary end point was the incidence of adverse events. Lipid values and major adverse cardiovascular events were prospectively collected. A total of 6635 patients were enrolled in FOURIER-OLE (3355 randomized to evolocumab and 3280 to placebo in the parent study). Median follow-up in FOURIER-OLE was 5.0 years; maximum exposure to evolocumab in parent plus FOURIER-OLE was 8.4 years. At 12 weeks in FOURIER-OLE, median LDL-C was 30 mg/dL, and 63.2% of patients achieved LDL-C <40 mg/dL on evolocumab. Incidences of serious adverse events, muscle-related events, new-onset diabetes, hemorrhagic stroke, and neurocognitive events with evolocumab long term did not exceed those for placebo-treated patients during the parent study and did not increase over time. During the FOURIER-OLE follow-up period, patients originally randomized in the parent trial to evolocumab versus placebo had a 15% lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina or coronary revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75-0.96]; P=0.008); a 20% lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.68-0.93]; P=0.003); and a 23% lower risk of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.60-0.99]; P=0.04). Long-term LDL-C lowering with evolocumab was associated with persistently low rates of adverse events for >8 years that did not exceed those observed in the original placebo arm during the parent study and led to further reductions in cardiovascular events compared with delayed treatment initiation. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifiers: NCT02867813 and NCT03080935.

S185: CARTITUDE-2 COHORT B: UPDATED CLINICAL DATA AND BIOLOGICAL CORRELATIVE ANALYSES OF CILTACABTAGENE AUTOLEUCEL IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND EARLY RELAPSE AFTER INITIAL THERAPY

Background: CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) is a phase 2, multicohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). Cohort B enrolled pts who had early relapse after initial therapy. These pts have functionally high-risk disease, as early relapse following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is associated with poor prognosis, representing an unmet medical need. Aims: To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 cohort B. Methods: All pts provided informed consent. Pts had MM, received 1 prior line of therapy (proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug required), had disease progression per International Myeloma Working Group criteria (either ≤12 months after ASCT or ≤12 months after initiation of anti-myeloma therapy for pts not treated with ASCT), and were naive to CAR-T or other anti-B-cell maturation antigen therapies. After lymphodepletion, a single cilta-cel infusion was administered at a target dose of 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg. Efficacy and safety were evaluated. The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5. Patient management strategies were used to minimize risk of movement and neurocognitive adverse events (MNTs). Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, including Cmax and Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood are being performed. Additional assessments include levels of cytokine release syndrome (CRS)-related cytokines (eg, IL-6) over time, peak levels of cytokines by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR+ T cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: 19 pts (median age: 58.0 years [range: 44-67]; 74% male) received cilta-cel as of January 2022; 79% received prior ASCT. Median follow-up was 13.4 months (range: 5.2-21.7). Overall response rate was 100.0%, with 90% of pts achieving ≥complete response, and 95% achieving ≥very good partial response. Median time to first response was 0.95 months (range: 0.9-9.7) and median time to best response was 5.1 months (range: 0.9-11.8). Among 15 MRD-evaluable pts, 14 (93%) achieved MRD 10-5 negativity. Median duration of response was not reached. The 12-month progression-free survival rate was 90%; 12-month event-free rate was 88.9%. CRS occurred in 16 (84.2%) pts (1 grade 4); median time to onset was 8 days (range: 5-11) and all events resolved. ICANS (grade 1) and MNT (grade 3, previously reported) occurred in 1 pt each. 1 pt died post cilta-cel (progressive disease, day 158). Preliminary PK data showed peak expansion of CAR-T cells on day 13.1 (range: 8.96-209.9); median persistence was 76.9 days (range: 40.99-221.8). Summary/Conclusion: This functionally high-risk pt population with early relapse after initial therapy experienced deep and durable responses with manageable safety following a single cilta-cel infusion. Cilta-cel led to responses in pts with ineffective or insufficient response to ASCT. Follow-up is ongoing and responses continue to deepen. We will present updated and detailed PK, cytokine, and CAR-T subset analyses as well as clinical correlation to provide insight into biological correlates of efficacy and safety in these pts.

Phase 1b/2 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): Two years post-LPI.

8028 Background: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–targeting single-domain antibodies, led to early, deep, and durable responses in the phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study (NCT03548207) in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). At ̃1-year (y) median follow-up (MFU), overall response rate (ORR) was 97%; 67% of pts achieved stringent complete response (sCR). 1-y progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 77% and 89%, respectively (Berdeja 2021). Updated results 2-y post last patient in (LPI) will be presented (̃30-month total MFU). Here, we report CARTITUDE-1 results at 21.7-month MFU. Methods: Eligible pts with RRMM received ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) or were refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and had received a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 antibody. Bridging therapy was permitted after apheresis. Pts received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) 5–7 days after lymphodepletion. Primary objectives were to evaluate cilta-cel safety and efficacy. Response was assessed per International Myeloma Working Group criteria by independent review committee and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5 by next-generation sequencing. Results: As of July 22, 2021, 97 pts (59% male; median age 61 y) received cilta-cel. Pts had a median of 6 (range 3–18) prior LOT; 84% were penta-drug exposed, 88% were triple-class refractory, 42% were penta-drug refractory, and 99% were refractory to last LOT. ORR was 97.9% (95% CI 92.7–99.7), 94.9% achieved very good partial response, and 82.5% achieved sCR. Median times to first response, best response, and ≥CR were 1.0, 2.6, and 2.9 months (m), respectively; median duration of response was not reached (NR). Of 61 pts evaluable for MRD, 92% were MRD negative (10-5), sustained for ≥6 m in 44% (27/61) and ≥12 m in 18% (11/61). 2-y PFS was 60.5% (95% CI 48.5–70.4). Median PFS and OS were NR. 2-y PFS rates in pts with sustained MRD negativity for ≥6 m and ≥12 m were 91% and 100%, respectively. There were no new safety signals or new events of CAR-T cell neurotoxicity, movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events, or treatment-related deaths since 1-y MFU. 15 second primary malignancies were reported in 11 pts over ̃2-y MFU. Conclusions: At ̃2-y MFU, a single cilta-cel infusion led to deepening and durable responses in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM with a manageable safety profile. Follow-up is ongoing, and landmark 2-y post LPI data (̃8 m additional follow-up; ̃30 m total MFU) will be presented. Further investigations of cilta-cel are ongoing in earlier LOT and outpatient settings across the CARTITUDE program (NCT04133636, NCT04181827, NCT04923893). Clinical trial information: NCT03548207.

Safety of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo determine the harms of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in people who need lipid-lowering therapy.MethodsThis systematic review included randomised controlled trials that compared PCSK9 inhibitors with placebo, standard...

Safety of ezetimibe in lipid-lowering treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies

ObjectiveTo determine the harms of ezetimibe in people who need lipid-lowering treatment.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesRandomised controlled trials and cohort studies.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudies comparing ezetimibe with placebo, standard...

Incidence and management of CAR-T neurotoxicity in patients with multiple myeloma treated with ciltacabtagene autoleucel in CARTITUDE studies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are highly effective for multiple myeloma (MM) but their impressive efficacy is associated with treatment-related neurotoxicities in some patients. In CARTITUDE-1, 5% of patients with MM reported movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (MNTs) with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted CAR T-cell therapy. We assessed the associated factors for MNTs in CARTITUDE-1. Based on common features, patients who experienced MNTs were characterized by the presence of a combination of at least two variables: high tumor burden, grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or any grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after cilta-cel infusion, and high CAR T-cell expansion/persistence. Strategies were implemented across the cilta-cel development program to monitor and manage patients with MNTs, including enhanced bridging therapy to reduce baseline tumor burden, early aggressive treatment of CRS and ICANS, handwriting assessments for early symptom detection, and extended monitoring/reporting time for neurotoxicity beyond 100 days post-infusion. After successful implementation of these strategies, the incidence of MNTs was reduced from 5% to <1% across the cilta-cel program, supporting its favorable benefit–risk profile for treatment of MM.

Abstract 11043: Clinical Safety Outcomes in Relation to Lipoprotein(a) Concentration: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Background: Lipoprotein(a) is believed to play a causal role in atherogenesis. Drugs are in development that directly target Lp(a) and lower levels by &gt;75%. Thus, the safety of low Lp(a) levels is of importance. Methods: FOURIER randomized 27,564 patients w/ stable ASCVD to evolocumab (EVO) vs placebo on background statin (median f/up 2.2 y); EVO lowered Lp(a) levels by 27%. The relationships between Lp(a) levels, change in Lp(a) and 5 safety outcomes of interest based on prior reports (diabetes [DM], serious bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, neurocognitive events, malignancy) were examined. Analyses were conducted in the overall population and by treatment arm. Multivariable models included age, sex, race, region, clinical predictors, high-intensity statin, ezetimibe, baseline hs-CRP, “Lp(a)-corrected” LDL-C, and treatment arm. Results: Lp(a) was assessed in 25,083 participants at baseline (median 37nM, range 5-1451) and 25,686 at week 12. There was no association between baseline or achieved Lp(a) levels and risk of serious bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, neurocognitive events, or malignancy, even in the 3271 patients with Lp(a) levels ≤6nM. There was an inverse association between baseline Lp(a) levels and prevalent or incident DM [OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.07-1.12, for every 50nM lower Lp(a) below 250nM]. However, absolute change in Lp(a) with EVO was not associated with subsequent DM risk (HR 1.03, 0.91-1.16, per 50nM) and EVO did not increase the risk of DM irrespective of baseline Lp(a) (P int=0.97), even in participants in the top decile of baseline Lp(a) (HR 0.91, 0.51-1.62) in whom EVO reduced Lp(a) by 63nM. Conclusion: Lp(a) concentration and changes in Lp(a) were not associated with serious bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, neurocognitive events, or malignancy. Levels were inversely correlated with having DM, but Lp(a) lowering over a median of 2.2 years with EVO did not further increase the risk. These findings provide new insights for ongoing trials of Lp(a)-lowering drugs.