Neurocognitive Adverse Events Research Articles

In-depth Analysis of Lorlatinib-related neurocognitive Adverse Events in Patients With Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionLorlatinib is a potent, brain penetrant, next-generation ALK/ROS1 TKI, with high response rates and durable responses, including the brain. However, a significant drawback is the manifestation of neurocognitive adverse events (NCAEs). Despite being generally low-grade in severity, these NCAEs can be physically and mentally disabling. Extensive neurocognitive testing in this group of patients is lacking; therefore we conducted this study. Patients and methodsThis observational prospective study was conducted across 3 Dutch university hospitals. Patients with metastatic NSCLC with an ALK- or ROS1-rearrangement and having an indication to start lorlatinib in daily clinical practice were eligible. The primary endpoints were to identify changes in neurocognitive functioning, measured through neurocognitive assessment at intervals of 2 weeks and 2 months after starting lorlatinib, in comparison to baseline. As a secondary endpoint, the correlation between neurocognitive impairment and self-reported neurocognitive dysfunction was examined. ResultsBetween June 2019 and October 2022, 22 patients were included. Among the various neurocognitive tests administered, only the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised parts b and c demonstrated a significant and clinically relevant decrease in scoring 2 weeks post initiation of lorlatinib (P = .036 and P = .003, respectively). However, these returned to baseline at the 2-month evaluation. The questionnaires did not result in significantly different outcomes over time. ConclusionLorlatinib treatment did not result in a sustained and significant decline within any of the specified neurocognitive domains.

1365P Neurocognitive adverse events related to lorlatinib in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

1365P Neurocognitive adverse events related to lorlatinib in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Propensity score-matched analysis comparing hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous integrated boost with hippocampus‑avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy alone for multiple brain metastases-a retrospective study in multiple institutions

BackgroundThe optimal treatment for multiple brain metastases has been recently controversially discussed.This study was aimed to explore the feasibility of Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy plus a simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT + SIB) in patients with multiple brain metastases and assess tumor control in comparison with Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) alone for brain metastases.MethodsIn this study, 63 patients with multiple brain metastases (≥ 4 metastases) had undergone HA-WBRT + SIB between January 2016 and December 2020 in the observation group:HA-WBRT (30 Gy in 12 fractions, the maximum dose of the hippocampus ≤ 14 Gy) plus a simultaneous integrated boost (48 Gy in 12 fractions) for brain metastases.Overall Survival (OS), Median survival,intracranial control (IC = control within the entire brain), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and adverse events were compared with the control group (a HA-WBRT retrospective cohort) by propensity score matching analysis.ResultsAfter 1:1 propensity score matching,there were 56 patients in each group (the observation group, the control group). OS, median survival and iPFS were significantly longer in the observation group (18.4 vs. 10.9 months, P<0.001), (13.0 vs. 8.0 months, P<0.001), (13.9 vs.7.8 months, P<0.001). In comparison of 1-year-IC rates, the observation group also demonstrated higher than the control group (51.8% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.002), respectively. Seven hippocampal metastases were found in the control group (4/56,7.1%) and the observation group (3/56,5.4%) after HA-WBRT. The death rate of intracranial progression were 23.2% in the observation group and 37.5% in the control group.All adverse events were not significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsHA-WBRT + SIB resulted in better OS,median survival, IC, iPFS, an acceptable risk of radiation response, and a potential way of declining neurocognitive adverse events, which may be a better treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases.

Individualized approach to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor dosing in cystic fibrosis, in response to self-reported anxiety and neurocognitive adverse events: A case series.

The prevalence of mental health disorders is high among people with Cystic Fibrosis. The psychological symptoms in CF are associated with poor adherence, worse treatment outcomes, and greater health utilization/cost. Mental health and neurocognitive Adverse Events (AEs) have been reported with all available Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) modulators in small groups of patients. We report our experience with a dose reduction strategy in 10 of our patients on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (7.9% of total number of patients) who self-reported developing intense anxiety, irritability, sleep disturbance and/or mental slowness after initiation of full dose treatment. Standard dose elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor resulted in 14.3 points improvement in mean Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1s (ppFEV1), and a mean difference in sweat chloride of -39.3mmol/L. We initially discontinued and/or reduced therapy according to the AEs severity, with a subsequent planned dose escalation every 4-6weeks guided by sustainability of clinical effectiveness, absence of AEs recurrence, and patients' preferences. Clinical parameters including lung function and sweat chloride were monitored for up to 12weeks to assess ongoing clinical response to the reduced dose regimen. Dose reduction resulted in resolution of self-reported mental/psychological AEs, without loss of clinical effectiveness (ppFEV1 was 80.7% on standard dose, and 83.4% at 12weeks on reduced dose; sweat chloride was 33.4 and 34mmol/L on standard and reduced dose, respectively). Furthermore, in a subgroup of patients who completed 24weeks of the reduced dose regimen, repeat low dose Computed Tomography imaging showed a significant response when compared to pre-initiation of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.

Association Between Achieved Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Long-Term Cardiovascular and Safety Outcomes: An Analysis of FOURIER-OLE.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the optimal achieved LDL-C level with regard to efficacy and safety in the long term remains unknown. In FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk), 27 564 patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomized to evolocumab versus placebo, with a median follow-up of 2.2 years. In the open-label extension (FOURIER-OLE), 6635 of these patients were transitioned to open-label evolocumab regardless of initial treatment allocation in the parent trial and were followed for an additional median of 5 years. In this prespecified analysis, we examined the relationship between achieved LDL-C levels (an average of the first 2 LDL-C levels measured) in FOURIER-OLE (available in 6559 patients) and the incidence of subsequent cardiovascular and safety outcomes. We also performed sensitivity analyses evaluating cardiovascular and safety outcomes in the entire FOURIER and FOURIER-OLE patient population. Multivariable modeling was used to adjust for baseline factors associated with achieved LDL-C levels. In FOURIER-OLE, 1604 (24%), 2627 (40%), 1031 (16%), 486 (7%), and 811 (12%) patients achieved LDL-C levels of <20, 20 to <40, 40 to <55, 55 to <70, and ≥70 mg/dL, respectively. There was a monotonic relationship between lower achieved LDL-C levels-down to very low levels <20 mg/dL-and a lower risk of the primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospital admission for unstable angina or coronary revascularization) and the key secondary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) that persisted after multivariable adjustment (adjusted Ptrend<0.0001 for each end points). No statistically significant associations existed in the primary analyses between lower achieved LDL-C levels and increased risk of the safety outcomes (serious adverse events, new or recurrent cancer, cataract-related adverse events, hemorrhagic stroke, new-onset diabetes, neurocognitive adverse events, muscle-related events, or noncardiovascular death). Similar findings were noted in the entire FOURIER and FOURIER-OLE cohort up to a maximum follow-up of 8.6 years. In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, long-term achievement of lower LDL-C levels, down to <20 mg/dL (<0.5 mmol/L), was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes with no significant safety concerns. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifier: NCT01764633.

Factors Associated With Developing Neurocognitive Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Lorlatinib After Progression on Other Targeted Therapies

IntroductionThe safety profile of lorlatinib includes neurocognitive adverse events (NAEs). Baseline factors associated with developing NAEs remain poorly characterized. MethodsRecords from patients who received lorlatinib through prospective studies at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH, n = 124) or the phase 1/2 B7461001 (NCT01970865; n = 248) study were reviewed to identify potential associations between comorbidities, baseline medications, and NAEs. ResultsMost patients experienced a NAE (MGH: 60%, B7461001: 49%). Cognitive effects occurred in 40% and 29% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. Brain metastases (p = 0.008), brain radiation (p = 0.033), psychiatric illness (p = 0.008), psychiatric medications (p < 0.001), antiepileptics (p < 0.001), and stimulants (p = 0.026) were associated with developing cognitive effects in B7461001. Mood effects occurred in 36% and 23% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. In the MGH cohort, psychiatric illness (p = 0.02) and stimulants (p = 0.01) were associated with developing mood effects whereas brain surgery (p = 0.020), psychiatric medications (p < 0.001), benzodiazepines (p = 0.002), and sedatives (p = 0.034) were associated with developing mood effects in B7461001. Psychotic effects were infrequent (MGH: 3%, B7461001: 9%) and were associated with brain surgery in the MGH cohort (p = 0.001) and age in B7461001 (p = 0.014). Speech effects were observed in 23% and 11% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. Brain radiation (p = 0.012) and antiepileptics (p < 0.001) were associated with speech effects in B7461001. Dose reductions were implemented for 52% and 18% of patients with NAEs in MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively, with mitigating effect. ConclusionsNeurocognitive effects from lorlatinib are common. Lorlatinib-related NAEs may be influenced by multiple factors, including brain metastases, brain radiation, psychiatric illness, and use of neurotropic medications.

S185: CARTITUDE-2 COHORT B: UPDATED CLINICAL DATA AND BIOLOGICAL CORRELATIVE ANALYSES OF CILTACABTAGENE AUTOLEUCEL IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND EARLY RELAPSE AFTER INITIAL THERAPY

Background: CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) is a phase 2, multicohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). Cohort B enrolled pts who had early relapse after initial therapy. These pts have functionally high-risk disease, as early relapse following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is associated with poor prognosis, representing an unmet medical need. Aims: To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 cohort B. Methods: All pts provided informed consent. Pts had MM, received 1 prior line of therapy (proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug required), had disease progression per International Myeloma Working Group criteria (either ≤12 months after ASCT or ≤12 months after initiation of anti-myeloma therapy for pts not treated with ASCT), and were naive to CAR-T or other anti-B-cell maturation antigen therapies. After lymphodepletion, a single cilta-cel infusion was administered at a target dose of 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg. Efficacy and safety were evaluated. The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5. Patient management strategies were used to minimize risk of movement and neurocognitive adverse events (MNTs). Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, including Cmax and Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood are being performed. Additional assessments include levels of cytokine release syndrome (CRS)-related cytokines (eg, IL-6) over time, peak levels of cytokines by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR+ T cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: 19 pts (median age: 58.0 years [range: 44-67]; 74% male) received cilta-cel as of January 2022; 79% received prior ASCT. Median follow-up was 13.4 months (range: 5.2-21.7). Overall response rate was 100.0%, with 90% of pts achieving ≥complete response, and 95% achieving ≥very good partial response. Median time to first response was 0.95 months (range: 0.9-9.7) and median time to best response was 5.1 months (range: 0.9-11.8). Among 15 MRD-evaluable pts, 14 (93%) achieved MRD 10-5 negativity. Median duration of response was not reached. The 12-month progression-free survival rate was 90%; 12-month event-free rate was 88.9%. CRS occurred in 16 (84.2%) pts (1 grade 4); median time to onset was 8 days (range: 5-11) and all events resolved. ICANS (grade 1) and MNT (grade 3, previously reported) occurred in 1 pt each. 1 pt died post cilta-cel (progressive disease, day 158). Preliminary PK data showed peak expansion of CAR-T cells on day 13.1 (range: 8.96-209.9); median persistence was 76.9 days (range: 40.99-221.8). Summary/Conclusion: This functionally high-risk pt population with early relapse after initial therapy experienced deep and durable responses with manageable safety following a single cilta-cel infusion. Cilta-cel led to responses in pts with ineffective or insufficient response to ASCT. Follow-up is ongoing and responses continue to deepen. We will present updated and detailed PK, cytokine, and CAR-T subset analyses as well as clinical correlation to provide insight into biological correlates of efficacy and safety in these pts.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of indolent systemic mastocytosis: Are we there yet?

Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) is the most prevalent form of systemic mastocytosis. Many patients with ISM suffer from mast cell (MC) mediator-related symptoms. In a small number of patients, hematologic progression is seen in the follow-up. In some patients with ISM, symptoms arising from MC-derived mediators including gastrointestinal symptoms, anaphylaxis, and neuropsychiatric symptoms are kept under control with conventional mediator-targeting drugs or MC-stabilizing agents. However, in a substantial number of patients, the symptoms are refractory to such conventional therapy. For these patients, novel drugs and targeted approaches are considered. One reasonable approach may be to apply tyrosine kinase inhibitors directed against KIT and other key kinase targets expressed in neoplastic MCs in ISM. Because MCs in more than 90% of all patients with typical ISM display the KIT D816V mutant receptor, clinically effective KIT-targeting drugs have to be active against this mutant form of KIT. The 2 such most effective and well-studied agents currently available are midostaurin and avapritinib. Other KIT-targeting drugs, such as imatinib or masitinib, are less effective or even noneffective against KIT D816V and are thus recommended for use only in patients with other KIT mutant forms (noncodon 816 mutations) or with wild-type KIT. In the present article, we review the current state in the treatment of ISM with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with special emphasis on treatment responses and potential adverse effects. In fact, all of these agents also have unique and common adverse effects, and their use to treat patients with ISM should be balanced against their toxicity and short- and long-term safety.

Neurocognitive Disorders Associated with PCSK9 Inhibitors: a Pharmacovigilance Disproportionality Analysis.

PCSK9 might affect central nervous system development, neuronal apoptosis, and differentiation. We investigate the neurocognitive adverse events associated with the use of PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab and evolocumab) using pharmacovigilance reports. We used the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase) to perform a disproportionality analysis comparing the proportion of neurocognitive adverse events reported with PCSK9 inhibitors versus the proportion of these effects reported since August 14, 2015 (date of first post-marketing report suspecting a PCSK9 inhibitor), for all drugs in the database. Associations between PCSK9 inhibitor use and neurocognitive adverse events were assessed using both proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and information component (IC). Complementary analyses were performed on other neurologic events, and different sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of results. Among the 81,108 reports involving at least one PCSK9 inhibitor, 1,941 concerned the occurrence of neurocognitive disorders. Most of patients (52.3%) were aged 45-74years, and 58.0% were women. Signals of disproportionate reporting were found for PCSK9 inhibitors (PRR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17; 1.28; IC 0.28, IC025 0.21) and for each drug individually. No signal of disproportionality was found for any of the other neurologic events investigated. Signals of disproportionate reporting were found for the positive control (benzodiazepines), but not for the negative control (aspirin). The results of the main analysis were confirmed by sensitivity analyses. This study identified a signal of neurocognitive disorders associated with PCSK9 inhibitors and encourages paying attention to at-risk populations.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and the risk for neurocognitive adverse events: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

BackgroundIt has been suggested that lipid lowering therapy causes impaired cognitive changes. The association between the use of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and the risk of neurocognitive adverse events remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to assess neurocognitive safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods and resultsThe research was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane library were searched through September 2019. Selection criteria included RCTs that addressed to neurocognitive adverse events of participants using Alirocumab, Evolocumab or Bococizumab, with a follow up duration of at least 6 months. The search results were screened by two independent reviewers. Safety data from included papers were extracted. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool results, and meta-regression was utilized when applicable. Twenty-one studies were included. Among 59,733 patients, 31,611 were treated with PCSK9 inhibitors. The follow-up period ranged from 24 weeks to 48 months. No significant difference in the incidence of neurocognitive adverse effects between the groups was identified (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86–1.19, I2 = 3%). Similar results were seen in subgroup analysis for each of the medications (alirocumab- RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72–1.08, I2 = 0%, evolocumab- RR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.74–2.73, I2 = 55%). A meta-regression analysis for evolocumab revealed that prolonged study duration was associated with decreased risk for neurocognitive adverse events (βweek = −0.0037, p-value = 0.03). ConclusionsPooled results of our meta-analysis and meta-regression show that exposure to PCSK9 inhibitors is not associated with an increased risk of neurocognitive adverse effects.

The effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on brain stroke prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsAlthough proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes, their effects on brain stroke risk are unclear. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on brain stroke prevention. Methods and resultsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for research published until December 30, 2020, to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PCSK9 inhibitors for brain stroke prevention. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to represent the outcomes. Seven RCTs with 57,440 participants, including 29,850 patients treated with PCSK9 inhibitors and 27,590 control participants, were included. PCSK9 inhibitors were associated with significant reductions in total brain stroke risk (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67–0.88; P < 0.001) and ischemic brain stroke risk (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66, 0.89; P < 0.001) in comparison with the control group. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.84–1.07; P = 0.382) and the risk of hemorrhagic brain stroke (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.66–1.51; P = 0.999) between patients treated with PCSK9 inhibitors and controls. PCSK9 inhibitors did not significantly increase the incidence of neurocognitive adverse events (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.81–1.29; P = 0.85). Moreover, subgroup analysis showed no difference in cognitive function disorder risks among different PCSK9 inhibitors and treatment times. ConclusionsPCSK9 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of total brain stroke and ischemic brain stroke without increasing the risk of brain hemorrhage and neurocognitive impairment.

Neurocognitive effects associated with proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitor use: a narrative review.

Neurocognitive adverse events have been observed with the widespread use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors or “statins,” which reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and subsequently cardiovascular risk. The United States Food and Drug Association directed manufacturers of proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors to monitor for neurocognitive adverse events due to their potent effects on LDL-C reduction, which is a proposed mechanism for neuronal cell dysfunction. Other proposed mechanisms for PCSK9 inhibitor-associated neurocognitive adverse events include N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor modulation, dysregulation of lipid and glucose metabolism, and patient-specific risk factors for cognitive impairment. The purpose of this narrative review article is to describe the proposed mechanisms, incidence of neurocognitive adverse events from phase II and III trials for PCSK9 inhibitors, neurocognitive assessments utilized in clinical trials, and clinical implications. Given the increasing prevalence of PCSK9 inhibitor use and the neurocognitive adverse events observed with prior lipid-lowering therapies, clinicians should be aware of the risks associated with PCSK9 inhibitors, especially when therapy is indicated for patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. Overall, the incidence of PCSK9 inhibitor-associated neurocognitive appears to be uncommon. However, additional prospective studies evaluating cognitive impairment may be beneficial to determine the long-term safety of these agents.

Real-World Safety of CFTR Modulators in the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review.

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies target the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis (CF), and are generally well-tolerated; however, real-world studies indicate the frequency of discontinuation and adverse events (AEs) may be higher than what was observed in clinical trials. The objectives of this systematic review were to summarize real-world AEs reported for market-available CFTR modulators (i.e., ivacaftor (IVA), lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA), tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA), and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA)), and to identify ways in which the pharmacist on CF healthcare teams may contribute to mitigating and managing these AEs. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection online databases were searched from 2012 to 1 Aug 2020. Full manuscripts or conference abstracts of observational studies, case series, and case reports were eligible for inclusion. The included full manuscripts and conference abstracts comprised of 54 observational studies, 5 case series, and 9 case reports. The types of AEs reported generally aligned with what have been observed in clinical trials. LUM/IVA was associated with a higher frequency of respiratory-related AE and discontinuation in real-world studies. A signal for mental health and neurocognitive AEs was identified with all 4 CFTR modulators. A systematic approach to monitoring for AEs in people with CF on CFTR modulators in the real-world setting is necessary to help better understand potential AEs, as well as patient characteristics that may be associated with higher risk of certain AEs. Pharmacists play a key role in the safe initiation and monitoring of people with CF on CFTR modulator therapies.

Exposure to Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and the association with neurocognitive side effects: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

Abstract Background Lipid lowering therapy may be associated with impaired cognitive function. The association between the use of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and the risk of neurocognitive adverse effects remains unclear. Purpose To assess the neurocognitive safety of PCSK9 inhibitors using meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane library were searched. RCTs that reported assessments of neurocognitive outcomes of participants using PCSK9 inhibitors, with a duration of follow up of at least six months were included. The results of the search were screened by two independent reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus. The research was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for meta-analyses. Results were pooled using random-effects models. The primary safety outcome of this analysis was defined as the reported incidence of neurocognitive adverse effects. Results Results of 21 trials were included in the analysis. Among 59,733 patients, 31,611 were treated with PCSK9 inhibitors. No significant difference in the incidence of neurocognitive side effects between the treatment and control groups was identified (RR=1.01, 95% CI: 0.86–1.19, I2=3%). Same results were seen in separate analysis for each of the medicines (Alirocumab- RR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.72–1.08, I2=0%, Evolocumab- RR=1.42, 95% CI: 0.74–2.73, I2=55%). In a meta-regression analysis there was no statistically significant association between the assessed and the risk for neurocognitive side effects. Conclusions Pooled results of our meta-analysis and meta-regression clearly show that the exposure to PCSK9 inhibitors is not associated with an increased risk of neurocognitive adverse events. Due to the increasing proportion of patients using lipid-lowering therapy these results are positively reassuring. However, more data from long-term outcomes studies is needed to further evaluate the effect of longer exposure to PCSK9 inhibitors Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

A PHASE IIA STUDY REPOSITIONING DESIPRAMINE IN SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AND OTHER HIGH-GRADE NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS

A bioinformatics approach identified antitumor effects of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas) (G3NEC) that was subsequently validated in preclinical models with a putative mechanism of action via inhibition of neuroendocrine signaling pathways. This study was undertaken to reposition the candidate TCA desipramine in a clinical trial in SCLC and G3NEC. In this prospective, phase IIa intrapatient dose escalation clinical trial, patients were required to have failed at least one prior chemotherapy for metastatic SCLC or G3NEC. Treatment with desipramine began at 75 mg nightly with escalation in increments of 75 mg weekly to a maximum of 450 mg daily. Six patients were enrolled, 3 with SCLC, and 3 with G3NEC (lung, rectal, and pancreas). Tolerability of desipramine was worse than predicted. Of the 6 patients enrolled: 1 patient achieved 300 mg daily, 2 patients reached 150 mg daily, 1 patient reached 75 mg daily, and 2 patients were unable to tolerate any stable dose. Reasons for discontinuation included drug-related grade 3 colon pseudo-obstruction, unrelated GI bleed, and grade 1-2 neurocognitive adverse events. Median clinical or radiographic progression free survival was 1.2 months (range 0.2-3.3) and median overall survival from study entry was 2.7 months (range 1.3-5.6). No clinical or radiographic benefit was observed using desipramine to treat SCLC and G3NEC, so this trial was terminated. Intolerable low and medium grade neurocognitive side effects led to intermittent treatment and early discontinuation in most patients; given this limitation, doses achieved may be inadequate compared to the preclinical studies. A bioinformatics approach previously identified a potential antitumor effect of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma) (G3NEC), which was validated in preclinical models. In this prospective, phase IIa clinical trial, patients were required to have failed at least one prior chemotherapy for metastatic SCLC or G3NEC (Ki-67 ≥ 20% or ≥ 20 mitoses/10 HPF). Treatment with desipramine began at 75 mg nightly with escalation by 75 mg weekly to a maximum dose of 450 mg daily. Six patients were enrolled on this clinical trial, 3 with SCLC, and 3 with G3NEC (lung, rectal, and pancreatic). Tolerability of desipramine was worse than predicted. In the 6 patients enrolled: 1 patient achieved 300 mg daily, 2 patients reached 150 mg daily, 1 patient reached 75 mg daily, and 2 patients were unable to tolerate any stable dose. Reasons for discontinuation included drug-related grade 3 colon pseudo-obstruction, unrelated GI bleed, and grade 1-2 drug related dizziness, confusion, and somnolence. Though numbers are small, median clinical or radiographic progression free survival was 1.2 months (range 0.2-3.3) and median overall survival from study entry was 2.7 months (range 1.3-5.6). Although preclinical evidence was promising, no clinical or radiographic benefit was observed using desipramine to treat SCLC and G3NEC, so this trial was terminated.

Efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The effect of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapy with alirocumab or evolocumab on individual clinical efficacy and safety endpoints remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab in patients with dyslipidaemia or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We performed a review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with alirocumab or evolocumab vs. placebo or other lipid-lowering therapies up to March 2018. Primary efficacy endpoints were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models. We included 39 RCTs comprising 66478 patients of whom 35896 were treated with proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (14639 with alirocumab and 21257 with evolocumab) and 30582 with controls. Mean weighted follow-up time across trials was 2.3 years with an exposure time of 150617 patient-years. Overall, the effects of PCSK9 inhibition on all-cause death and cardiovascular death were not statistically significant (P = 0.15 and P = 0.34, respectively). Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors were associated with lower risk of MI (1.49 vs. 1.93 per 100 patient-year; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.86; I2 = 0%; P < 0.0001), ischaemic stroke (0.44 vs. 0.58 per 100 patient-year; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.89; I2 = 0%; P = 0.0005), and coronary revascularization (2.16 vs. 2.64 per 100 patient-year; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.89; I2 = 0%; P < 0.0001), compared with the control group. Use of these PCSK9 inhibitors was not associated with increased risk of neurocognitive adverse events (P = 0.91), liver enzymes elevations (P = 0.34), rhabdomyolysis (P = 0.58), or new-onset diabetes mellitus (P = 0.97). Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibition with alirocumab or evolocumab was associated with lower risk of MI, stroke, and coronary revascularization, with favourable safety profile.

PCSK9 inhibitors: clinical evidence and implementation.

The gene encoding PCSK9 was first identified and linked to the phenotype of familial hypercholesterolaemia approximately 15 years ago. Soon after, studies uncovered the role of PCSK9 in the regulation of LDL-receptor recycling and identified loss-of-function variants ofPCSK9 that were associated with low circulating levels of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and a reduced risk of coronary artery disease. With amazing rapidity, monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 were developed and studied in large clinical programmes. These PCSK9 inhibitors lowered plasma LDL-C levels by approximately 60%, even in patients already receiving maximum-dose statin therapy. In the past year, three cardiovascular outcome trials were completed and showed that PCSK9 inhibitors significantly reduce the risk of major vascular events. Reassuringly, this benefit comes with no major offsetting adverse events, such as an excess of myalgias, elevation of hepatic aminotransferases levels in the plasma, incident diabetes mellitus or neurocognitive adverse events. The clinical benefit of PCSK9 inhibitors seen in these trials occurred in the setting of reducing LDL-C levels to unprecedentedly low levels, suggesting that more aggressive LDL-C targets should be adopted. New technologies to inhibit PCSK9 are now being harnessed and might further revolutionize our treatment of dyslipidaemia.

Effect of PCSK9 Inhibitors on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia: A Meta-Analysis of 35 Randomized Controlled Trials.

BackgroundWe sought to examine the efficacy and safety of 2 PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitors: alirocumab and evolocumab.Methods and ResultsWe performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing treatment with and without PCSK9 inhibitors; 35 randomized controlled trials comprising 45 539 patients (mean follow‐up: 85.5 weeks) were included. Mean age was 61.0±2.8 years, and mean baseline low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol was 106±22 mg/dL. Compared with no PCSK9 inhibitor therapy, treatment with a PCSK9 inhibitor was associated with a lower rate of myocardial infarction (2.3% versus 3.6%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64–0.81]; P<0.001), stroke (1.0% versus 1.4%; OR: 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67–0.96]; P=0.02), and coronary revascularization (4.2% versus 5.8%; OR: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.71–0.86]; P<0.001). Overall, no significant change was observed in all‐cause mortality (OR: 0.71 [95% CI, 0.47–1.09]; P=0.12) or cardiovascular mortality (OR: 1.01 [95% CI, 0.85–1.19]; P=0.95). A significant association was observed between higher baseline low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and benefit in all‐cause mortality (P=0.038). No significant change was observed in neurocognitive adverse events (OR: 1.12 [95% CI, 0.88–1.42]; P=0.37), myalgia (OR: 0.95 [95% CI, 0.75–1.20]; P=0.65), new onset or worsening of preexisting diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.05 [95% CI, 0.95–1.17]; P=0.32), and increase in levels of creatine kinase (OR: 0.84 [95% CI, 0.70–1.01]; P=0.06) or alanine or aspartate aminotransferase (OR: 0.96 [95% CI, 0.82–1.12]; P=0.61).ConclusionsTreatment with a PCSK9 inhibitor is well tolerated and improves cardiovascular outcomes. Although no overall benefit was noted in all‐cause or cardiovascular mortality, such benefit may be achievable in patients with higher baseline low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol.

No evidence of neurocognitive adverse events associated with alirocumab treatment in 3340 patients from 14 randomized Phase 2 and 3 controlled trials: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

AimsDespite patient reports of neurocognitive disorders with lipid-lowering treatments (LLTs), large clinical trials have found no significant association between neurocognitive disorders and LLTs. We assessed incidence of neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from 14 Phase 2 and 3 trials of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor alirocumab.Methods and resultsPatients (most on background maximally tolerated statin) received alirocumab 75/150 mg every 2 weeks (n = 3340; 4029 patient-years of exposure), placebo (n = 1276), or ezetimibe (n = 618). Data were pooled by the control used. Neurocognitive TEAEs were reported by 22 (0.9%) alirocumab-treated patients vs. 9 (0.7%) with placebo in placebo-controlled trials [hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–2.68] and 10 (1.2%) with alirocumab vs. 8 (1.3%) with ezetimibe in ezetimibe-controlled trials (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.32–2.08). Rates of neurocognitive TEAEs were similar in patients receiving alirocumab with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels <25 mg/dL (<0.65 mmol/L; n = 5/839; 0.6%; 0.5/100 patient-years) vs. ≥25 mg/dL (n = 26/2501; 1.0%; 0.8/100 patient-years). One patient (0.1%; ezetimibe-controlled pool) receiving alirocumab had a neurocognitive TEAE leading to discontinuation vs. two (0.2%) patients receiving placebo and three (0.4%) patients receiving ezetimibe. Neurocognitive TEAE incidence was also similar between alirocumab and controls when stratified by age.ConclusionsNeurocognitive TEAE incidences were low (≤1.2%), with no significant differences between alirocumab vs. controls up to 104 weeks. No association was found between neurocognitive TEAEs and LDL-C <25 mg/dL based on the completed Phase 2 and 3 trials examined, although long-term effects of very low LDL-C levels induced by PCSK9 inhibitors are currently unknown.

Evolocumab

Evolocumab