Nerve Block In Patients Research Articles

Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block for surgical anesthesia in wound care patients with ongoing anticoagulant/antiaggregant therapy: A single-center, prospective study.

Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks may be a good alternative in patients under antithrombotic drugs. We evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing lower extremity wound debridement of whom antithrombotic drugs could not be stopped. We focused on hemorrhagic complications related to sciatic nerve block. Wound care patients followed by Cardiovascular Surgery Department scheduled for lower extremity wound surgery were included in this prospective observational study. Data was collected between March 2021 and September 2022. All patient were under antithrombotic therapy and discontinuation of anticoagulant drugs were not possible. Single-insertion and multiple-injection sciatic nerve block at popliteal region was applied to all patients under ultrasound guidance. Primary outcome was the rate of hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes were block onset times, block success and postoperative analgesia times. Data of 105 patients was evaluated, 87 were male and 18 were female. Mean patient age was 61.92 ± 10.06, mean patient body mass index was 25.68 ± 6.33. All patients were under 1 or more antithrombotic drugs. Only one minor hematoma was detected by postoperative ultrasonography control in 1 patient. Hemorrhage complication rate was 1 of 105 (% 0.95, 95% CI, 0.00024-0.051). Overall block success rate was 99.05%. Mean block onset time was 16.27 ± 5.69 minutes. Mean postoperative analgesia time was 19.5 ± 11.22 hours. Sciatic nerve block under ultrasound guidance using in-plane technique was safe and provided sufficient surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for lower extremity wound debridement surgery in patients on antithrombotic drugs.

Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study was to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block for patients who underwent knee arthroscopy. Patients were randomized into two groups: 1. nerve block group: ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block (superomedial, superolateral and inferomedial genicular nerve, 2-ml 0.5% ropivacaine each nerve.) prior to the general anesthesia, 2. control group: no intervention prior to the general anesthesia. The measurements were pain severity at 3,6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery at rest and at activity(Pain severity was primary outcome at 3 hours after surgery at rest); the time for first ambulation; straight leg raise; mechanical pain threshold of the block areas; time of the surgery, anesthesia and extubation; the use of analgesics in the perioperative period and 72 hours after the surgery; the number of patients awakening from pain on the first two nights after the surgery; the length of hospital stay; postoperative adverse effects. The pain severity was performed by VAS (A 10-point visual analogue scale, 0 points painless, 10 points severe pain) and median (interquartile range; IQR). A total of 70 patients (median age: 53 y, 32 men; 35 per group) were included. Compared to the control group, the nerve block group had a lower pain VAS score at rest (2[2-2] vs. 3[2-4], P<0.01) at 3 hours, and lower pain VAS score at rest persisted for 24 hours and activity persisted for 12 hours after the surgery, also had lower intraoperative dosage of sufentanil (20±4.8 vs. 28.5±5.1 mg; P<0.001), lower requirement for analgesics for pain and lower PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting) throughout the 72-hour observation period. There were no significant difference for the incidence of postoperative adverse effects and straight leg raise. In conclusion, ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block could reduce the pain severity after knee arthroscopy and decrease the use of intraoperative sufentanil without affecting motor function.

Comparison of two methods of greater occipital nerve block in patients with chronic migraine: ultrasound-guided and landmark-based techniques

BackgroundMigraine is a primary headache defined as moderate-to-severe pain lasting 4 to 72 h, ranking 2nd among the disabling conditions for both genders regardless of the age and the greater occipital nerve (GON) block has been reported as an efficient treatment method for migraine. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the efficiency of the two methods of GON block, i.e., the ultrasound (US)-guided technique and the landmark-based technique.MethodHaving a prospective and randomized design, the study assigned the patients with chronic migraine into two groups after which a neurologist performed landmark-based GON block in the first group while an algologist performed US-guided GON block in the second group. During the 3-month follow-up period, the number of days with pain, the duration of pain, the number of analgesic drugs taken in a month, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were compared with the values ​​before treatment and at the 1st week, 1st month, and 3rd month after treatment.ResultsUS-guided GON block group included 34 patients while there were 32 patients in the landmark-based GON block group. US-guided GON block group showed significantly reduced VAS scores and frequency of attacks compared to the landmark-based GON block group at Month 1 after the procedure. After a 3-month follow-up period of the two groups, the frequency of attacks, analgesic intake and the duration of attacks were lower in both groups compared to the baseline. At 3-month follow-up, the mean of VAS scores decreased from 9,47 ± 2,69 to 4,67 ± 1,9 in US-guided GON block group and from 9,46 ± 0,98 to 7 ± 2,5 in the landmark-based GON block group.ConclusionIt was determined that both US-guided and landmark-based GON block were efficient techniques in patients with chronic migraine. US-guided GON block technique resulted in lower VAS scores, shorter durations of pain, lower frequencies of attack, and lower intake of analgesics compared to the landmark-based GON block technique.

Can postanesthetic cold sensibility test be used as a tool for the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars? – In vivo study

Objectives: The goal of this investigation was to determine the efficiency of a postanesthetic cold test for the detection of pulpal anesthesia to improve diagnostic accuracy. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two participants who showed symptomatic irreversible pulpitis on the mandibular first molar, aged from 18 to 65 years, were given inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), and subjective anesthetic symptoms were seen after 15 min and were finally assigned for studies. To determine the effectiveness of a postanesthetic cold test for the detection of pulpal anesthesia, the target tooth was separated and Endo-Frost was utilized to conduct a postanesthetic cold sensibility test and was compared to the gold standard test, painful or painless sensation during actual root canal therapy. Of 52 participants, 9 had a positive response to the postanesthetic cold test and 43 had a negative response; 10 responded positively to the gold standard test, whereas 42 gave negative results. Results: The postanesthetic cold sensibility test can diagnose the effectiveness of pulp anesthesia showing a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 97.62%, positive likelihood ratio of 33.6, negative likelihood ratio of 0.2, positive predictive value of 88.89%, negative predictive value of 95.35%, accuracy of 94.23%, and Youden’s index of 0.78. Conclusions: The postanesthetic cold sensibility test can be used as a tool for the efficiency of IANB before starting root canal therapy to minimize pain and anxiety in patients.

Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided Intraarticular Injection of Corticosteroids and Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Block in Patients with Chronic Knee Pain

Abstract Background Chronic knee pain represents a major cause of disability and a burden on healthcare systems worldwide, being more prevalent in middle-aged and elderly patients. It can take a toll on patients’ daily life, keeps them from their favorite activities, saps of productivity, and diminishes overall quality of life. It can be caused by degenerative conditions, such as osteoarthritis (the most common cause), rheumatoid arthritis, crystalline arthritis and gout. lifestyle modification, pharmacologic management, and injections are the mainstay of therapy for elderly patients having chronic symptomatic knee pain with multiple medical comorbidities who do not wish/fit for surgical options. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACSI) was commonly adopted to alleviate chronic knee pain and was traditionally performed blindly depending only on anatomical land marks. Recently, Genicular nerve block (GNB) has recently emerged as a novel alternative treatment for chronic knee pain. Both Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACSI) and Genicular nerve block (GNB) can be carried out under Ultrasound guidance as a safer, cheaper and more feasible imaging modality for guidance as it provides real-time imaging for the knee structures in a dynamic manner giving the ability to do interventional procedures and providing more effective clinical results when compared to blind injections. Aim of the Work Illustrate the technical aspects, the indications and the methodology of local therapies for chronic knee pain performed by interventional radiologists and provide current evidence. Assess the efficacy of Ultrasound (US) guided intraarticular corticosteroids injection and Genicular nerve block to control moderate and advanced chronic knee pain. Compare the immediate and short-term symptomatic and functional improvement obtained after both techniques. Patients and Methods The study was carried out on 30 patients of symptomatic chronic knee pain with radiologically proven knee joint arthritis (26 of them had osteoarthritis, 3 had gout arthritis and one patient had rheumatoid arthritis), all of them were not responding to medical treatment. They were divided into two groups (intraarticular corticosteroids injection group and Genicular nerve block one) both procedures were performed under ultrasound guidance to identify target points for injection. GNB target points for injection where close to the superior lateral, superior medial and inferior medial genicular arteries while target point for the IACSI group was the suprapatellar bursa. All procedures were performed with a spinal needle (22 G) introduced under ultrasound guidance till reaching the desired target points at both groups. Then injection of a mixture of Lidocaine, Bupivacaine hydrochloride and Triamcinolone Acetonide was done. Results In our study, in IACSI group the mean of initial VAS was 80.7±10.3 compared to 81.3±7.7 in GNB group. The mean VAS significantly dropped to be 20.7±5.3 in IACSI group compared to 18.3±5.9 in GNB group. After 2 weeks, it was 34.3±8.4 and 27.7±8.2 respectively. After 4 weeks, it increased to 40±8.7 and 33.7±9.3 respectively. At 8 weeks, it was obviously increased to 75.3±10.3 and 66.7±11.4 respectively and the effect returned gradually till nearly the baseline at 8 weeks. In our study, in IACSI group the mean of initial OKS was 48.6±7.4 compared to 50.1±7.6 in GNB group. After 2 weeks, it was markedly decreased to 25.5±3.9 and 22.7±6.8 respectively. After 4 weeks, it increased to 31.1±3.5 and 27.±6.9 respectively. At 8 weeks, it was obviously increased to 44.1±7.1 and 39.3±6.1 respectively and the effect returned gradually till nearly the baseline at 8 weeks. Conclusion Ultrasound guided genicular nerve block with a mixture of corticosteroid and local anesthetic is an effective, radiation free method to alleviate chronic knee pain and improve knee joint function. US guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection through suprapatellar approach is also an effective method to relive chronic knee pain and inflammation and to improve knee joint functional capacity. Both procedures are effective in alleviation of chronic knee pain for up to 4 weeks with marked decrease in VAS score after 2 weeks and slight increasing trend towards 4 weeks. The favorable effect returned gradually till nearly the baseline at 8 weeks. Genicular nerve block is more effective than intra-articular corticosteroid injection in both pain alleviation and improving knee joint function. The earlier the Kellgren- Lawrence score is, the more reduction in chronic knee pain and the more improvement of joint function is achieved after both procedures.

Comparison of the effects of single injection and continuous infusion popliteal nerve block on pain and hemodynamics in diabetic foot surgery; prospective randomized clinical trial

ObjectivesIn patients undergoing surgery due to diabetic foot complications from uncontrolled diabetes may lead to neuraxial or general anesthesia-related issues. Regional anesthesia techniques can be preferred to prevent these complications. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects and outcomes in terms of pain of continuous infusion and single injection methods of popliteal nerve block in patients undergoing surgery due to diabetic foot. Materials and methodsSixty-three patients in ASA II-IV risk group scheduled for diabetic foot surgery were randomized into two groups for popliteal nerve block as the anesthesia method. Group 1 (n:32), 30 mL of local anesthetic was administered around the popliteal nerve under ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulator. Group 2 (n:31) had a catheter placed beyond the needle tip by 4–5 cm. An elastomeric pump was prepared for the infusion of 2 mL/h of 0.25 % bupivacaine through the catheter. Hemodynamic parameters before and after the block, onset, block duration times, postoperative pain scores, time to analgesic requirement, patient satisfaction, and discharge time were recorded. ResultsPain scores were higher in Group 1 after 12 h postoperatively and in Group 2 after 60 h postoperatively (p = 0.006, p < 0.01, respectively). The time to the first analgesic requirement was not statistically different between Group 1 (mean 804.64 ± 1020.8 min) and Group 2 (mean 2012.78 ± 1424 min) (p = 0.072). There was no significant difference in systolic, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate between groups before and after successful blockade (p > 0.05). ConclusionsContinuous infusion method of popliteal nerve block provides a longer pain-free period. Both methods showed similar hemodynamic data and low pain scores. Although continuous infusion method provides better analgesia, its procedural cost, technical difficulties, and adverse effects on patient comfort should also be considered.

The frequency of superior cluneal nerve entrapment diagnosed with ultrasound-guided nerve block in patients with low back pain: A prospective, cross-sectional study.

To determine the frequency of superior cluneal nerve entrapment (SCN-E) in patients who applied to our outpatient clinic with low back pain. Two hundred patients with mechanical low back pain persisting more than 3 months were included in our study. All patients were evaluated with detailed clinical history and physical examination. Ultrasound-guided diagnostic injection was performed in patients who had tenderness on the posterior iliac crest and whose main complaint emerged by pressing on this point. Patients with 70% or greater pain relief 1 h after the injection were considered as SCN-E. The frequency and clinical features of SCN-E were determined and compared with other mechanical low back pain. The mean age of the patients included in our study was 48.56 ± 14.11 years, with 138 female and 62 male patients. The diagnostic injection was performed on 31 patients and considered positive in 24 of them. The frequency of SCN-E was determined as 12%. The Hip-Knee Flexion Test was determined to be more specific for SCN-E than other causes of low back pain, the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 41.67% and 88.64% (p = 0.001; p < 0.01). In addition, all demographic and clinical features in patients diagnosed with SCN-E were found to be similar to other mechanical low back pain cases. In patients with chronic low back pain, SCN-E is not a rare cause and is often overlooked. Increasing the awareness and experience of physicians on SCN-E will prevent patients from being exposed to unnecessary surgical or non-surgical treatments.

A randomised trial comparing block characteristics of a mixture versus sequential injections of lignocaine and ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block in patients undergoing upper limb surgery.

There is no consensus on the appropriate use of mixtures of local anaesthetic drugs in various combinations for nerve blocks. We intended to compare short-acting lignocaine and long-acting ropivacaine as a mixture versus undiluted sequential injections on block characteristics of ultrasound-guided (USG) supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries. A double-blinded randomised study was conducted on 64 adult patients scheduled for upper limb surgery who received 15 mL each of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and 0.75% ropivacaine as a 1:1 mixture in the mixed group (Group M) or sequential injections in the sequential group (Group S) by using a USG technique. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants with complete four nerve sensory blocks at 10 minutes post block injection. Secondary outcomes were sensory and motor block characteristics till 30 minutes, total duration of analgesia, sensory and motor block, and complications. Demographic characteristics and time taken for the procedure were similar. The percentage of participants with a complete four-nerve sensory block at 10 minutes was higher in Group S (69%) versus Group M (41%) (P = 0.04). Complete sensory and motor block rates were similar at 30 minutes. The block procedure time, total duration of analgesia, and sensory and motor block were similar in both groups. There were no major complications. Sequential lignocaine-ropivacaine, compared to the mixed injection technique, has a higher initial rate of sensory and motor block onset with a similar total block duration.

The Effects of Perineural Dexamethasone on Rebound Pain After Nerve Block in Patients With Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

A single nerve block provides excellent analgesia in a short time, but rebound pain after the nerve block dissipates has attracted researchers' attention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of perineural dexamethasone on rebound pain after sciatic nerve block and femoral nerve block in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). In a double-blinded fashion, we recruited 72 patients undergoing UKA, each of whom received sciatic and femoral nerve block. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n=36): X (ropivacaine only) and D (ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone). The primary outcome was the incidence of rebound pain. The secondary outcomes were rebound pain score, the duration of rebound pain, the duration of nerve block, pain score, sufentanil consumption and rescue analgesic, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, distance walked, sleep quality score, C-reactive protein levels, and adverse effects. Compared with group X, the incidence of rebound pain in group D was higher, the rebound pain score was higher and the duration of the nerve block was prolonged ( P <0.05). At 12, 16, and 20 hours postoperatively, the pain scores at rest in group D were lower. At 32 and 36 hours postoperatively, the pain scores at rest in group D were higher ( P <0.05). Furthermore, patients in group D had lower levels of C-reactive protein after surgery ( P <0.05). The addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for UKA effectively prolonged the duration of nerve block and decreased C-reactive protein levels, but increased the incidence of rebound pain and rebound pain score, and had no beneficial effects on the postoperative analgesia.

The Effects of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block on Postoperative Pain in Patients with Hip Fracture: A Multicenter Study.

An adequate early mobilization followed by an effective and pain-free rehabilitation are critical for clinical and functional recovery after hip and proximal femur fracture. A multimodal approach is always recommended so as to reduce the administered dose of analgesics, drug interactions, and possible side effects. Peripheral nerve blocks should always be considered in addition to spinal or general anesthesia to prolong postoperative analgesia. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block appears to be a less invasive and more effective analgesia technique compared to other methods. We conducted multicenter retrospective clinical research, including 98 patients with proximal femur fracture undergoing osteosynthesis surgery within 48 h of occurrence of the fracture. Thirty minutes before performing spinal anesthesia, 49 patients underwent a femoral nerve (FN) block plus a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LCFN) block, and the other 49 patients received a PENG block. A non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (α = 0.05) test was performed to evaluate the difference in resting and dynamic numerical rating scale (NRS) at 30 min, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h. the PENG block administration was more effective in reducing pain intensity compared to the FN block in association with the LFCN block, as seen in the resting and dynamic NRS at thirty minutes and 12 h follow-up. the PENG block was more effective in reducing pain intensity than the femoral nerve block associated with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block in patients with proximal femur fracture undergoing to osteosynthesis.

Combined Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine as Adjuncts to Popliteal and Saphenous Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Surgery of the Foot or Ankle: A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.

Both dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine increase the duration of analgesia of peripheral nerve blocks. The authors hypothesized that combined intravenous dexamethasone and intravenous dexmedetomidine would result in a greater duration of analgesia when compared with intravenous dexamethasone alone and placebo. The authors randomly allocated participants undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle under general anesthesia and with a combined popliteal (sciatic) and saphenous nerve block to a combination of 12 mg dexamethasone and 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, 12 mg dexamethasone, or placebo (saline). The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia measured as the time from block performance until the first sensation of pain in the surgical area as reported by the participant. The authors predefined a 33% difference in the duration of analgesia as clinically relevant. A total of 120 participants from two centers were randomized and 119 analyzed for the primary outcome. The median [interquartile range] duration of analgesia was 1,572 min [1,259 to 1,715] with combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine, 1,400 min [1,133 to 1,750] with dexamethasone alone, and 870 min [748 to 1,138] with placebo. Compared with placebo, the duration was greater with combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine (difference, 564 min; 98.33% CI, 301 to 794; P < 0.001) and with dexamethasone (difference, 489 min; 98.33% CI, 265 to 706; P < 0.001). The prolongations exceeded the authors' predefined clinically relevant difference. The duration was similar when combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine was compared with dexamethasone alone (difference, 61 min; 98.33% CI, -222 to 331; P = 0.614). Dexamethasone with or without dexmedetomidine increased the duration of analgesia in patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle with a popliteal (sciatic) and saphenous nerve block. Combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine did not increase the duration of analgesia when compared with dexamethasone.

Efficacy of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Alone Versus Combination With Suprascapular Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgeries: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial.

Background and aim The regional anesthesia technique is commonly used for upper extremity surgery as an alternative to general anesthesia. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) and a combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block with suprascapular nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing shoulder surgeries. Method A total of 62 patients of both sexes with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II/III, aged between 18 and 65 years, and undergoing shoulder surgery, were included in this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were equally allocated into two groups: 31 in group A and 31 in group B.After pre-anesthetic evaluation, the purpose and protocol of the study were explained to patients, and informed consent was obtained. Thirty-one patients in group A were given infraclavicular brachial plexus block using 30 ml 0.375% bupivacainewhile 31 patients in group B were given a combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block using 30 ml 0.375% bupivacaine and suprascapular nerve block using 5 ml 0.375% bupivacaine.Blocks were given using ultrasound guidance and a peripheral nerve stimulator; the suprascapular block was given in the sitting positionwhile the infraclavicular block was provided in the supine position. General anesthesia was administered in the operation theatre in the supine position after the administration of blocks. The pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the satisfaction score was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS). The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for comparison of pain between the two groups. The chi-square test was utilized for comparing the categorical variables. Result The postoperative pain was significantly lower (p<0.001) in group B as compared to group A at all the periods of observation, i.e., 0h (2.77±0.72 vs. 5.42±0.77), 6h (3.89±0.70 vs. 5.94±0.73), 12h (5.66±0.93 vs. 6.58±0.88), and 24h (6.16±0.80 vs. 6.74±0.90). These findings illustrate that group B patients who received a combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block and suprascapular nerve block for shoulder surgeries had better pain relief than group A patients who received only the infraclavicular approach. The mean NRS score of patient satisfaction in group B (7.26±0.58) was significantly higher (p<0.001) in comparison to group A (6.16±0.64). Diaphragmatic palsy was observed in only one case in group A and none in group B. No other complication was observed in any of the patients during the study period. Conclusion The combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block and suprascapular nerve blockdisplays a positive postoperative analgesic profile with less usage of rescue analgesic doses and better patient satisfaction after shoulder surgery.

Analgesic Efficacy of Suprascapular Nerve Block versus Combined Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study

Abstract Background: Immediate post-operative pain can be severe and is an important outcome measure for patients in shoulder arthroscopic surgeries. Interscalene block is the most widely used and studied technique for post shoulder arthroscopy pain relief and is associated with certain unpleasant adverse effects. Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been suggested as an alternative and safer block. As the suprascapular nerve contributes to 70% of the sensory nerve supply to the shoulder joint, and the axillary circumflex nerve is the other major nerve contributing to 25%; therefore, a combined block of these two nerves should provide more effective pain relief than SSNB alone. Aim: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of combined SSNB and axillary nerve block (ANB) with SSNB alone for analgesia after shoulder arthroscopy in terms of level of pain scores, total analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction in 24 h. Methods: Forty-one patients posted for shoulder arthroscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, Group S (n = 20) receiving SSNB and Group C (n = 21) receiving combined SSNB and ANB. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) both at rest and during movement at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and at the time of first demand, total consumption of analgesics in 24 h and patient satisfaction score at 12 and 24 h were noted. Statistical Analysis: The data was analyzed by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher’s exact test using Graph Pad PRISM 9, a p&lt;0.05 was considered significant. Results: The VAS scores both at rest and during movement were significantly less in Group C at 1, 6, 12 h, and at the time of the first demand of analgesic (p&lt;0.05). Compared to Group S, Group C had a longer pain-free duration (154.3 ± 11.41 min vs. 36.60 ± 6.553 min; P &lt; 0.001) and lesser cumulative consumption of pethidine (300.0 ± 8.894 mg vs. 336.8 ± 13.27 mg; P = 0.0256). The satisfaction level was better in Group C at 12 h (P = 0.002) but comparable to the Group S at 24 h (P = 0.0673). Conclusion: Combined SSNB and ANB provided better pain relief in first 12 h, better patient satisfaction in the first 12 h and decreased overall consumption of analgesics in the first 24 h compared to SSNB alone.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Ultrasound- Guided Subacromial, Acromioclavicular with Subacromial Injection and Suprascapular Nerve Block in Patients with Shoulder Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled, Single Blind, Clinical T

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Ultrasound- Guided Subacromial, Acromioclavicular with Subacromial Injection and Suprascapular Nerve Block in Patients with Shoulder Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled, Single Blind, Clinical T

Pain scores reduction with the use of ultrasound-guided paracervical nerve block in patients with cervical cancer undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy: A randomized controlled trial.

To determine the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided paracervical nerve blocks for the painless treatment of patients with cervical cancer post-implantation. Single-center randomized controlled trial. Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (July 2023 to October 2023). ChiCTR2300071580 [https://clin.larvol.com/trial-detail/ChiCTR2300071580]. Eighty patients with cervical cancer underwent post-implantation treatment. Patients receiving and not receiving paracervical nerve blocks (Groups T and C, respectively) were randomly allocated. Primary measures included visual analog scale (VAS) scores and patient body movement scores at various stages, including vaginal speculum placement (T1), applicator/needle insertion (T2), treatment administration following connection of the treatment tube (T3), needle withdrawal and hemostasis (T4), and willingness to receive further treatment. The secondary observation indices in this study included the operation time, incidence of hypoxemia, occurrence of nausea and vomiting, adverse events related to the circulatory system, patient satisfaction score, operator satisfaction score, and operation duration required by patients with an Alderte score of ≥ 9. Forty patients each were randomly allocated into Groups T and C. The VAS scores did not differ significantly between the two groups at T1. However, at T3 and T4, the VAS scores of Group T was significantly lower than that of Group C. No significant difference was observed in the body movement scores between the two groups at T1 and T3. However, the body movement score of Group T was significantly lower than that of Group C (P < 0.001) at T2 and T4. Group T showed higher postoperative satisfaction and willingness to receive further treatment compared to that of Group C. Ultrasound-guided paracervical nerve block effectively reduced the pain scores in patients with cervical cancer undergoing post-implantation treatment and enhanced their inclination to undergo further treatment.

Effectiveness of Lidocaine versus Lidocaine with Magnesium Sulphate During Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomised Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of lidocaine with magnesium sulphate in patients undergoing root canal treatment following irreversible pulpitis. A total of 86 patients were randomised to receive 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine replaced with 0.2 ml of 10% magnesium sulphate with 1: 80,000 epinephrine (n=43) as MGS group and 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine (n=43) as LDC group. Preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were record-ed. Patients were instructed to report any perioperative pain felt during the access cavity preparation and when introducing the first patency file (#10 k) in the root canal and perioperative VAS recorded. The success rate of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) was higher in the MSG group. The mean+-SD of perioperative pain was 0.16+-0.37 in the MSG group and 3.13+-0.77 in the LDC group. The MGS group produced better anaesthetic efficacy with a p-value of 0.01. Based on the results, adding 10% magnesium sulphate to 2% lidocaine increased the effective-ness of IANB in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar teeth.

Effect of preoperative analgesics and cooled Lidocaine with Epinephrine on the anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Background:Treating mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis poses challenges, as achieving anaesthesia in “hot teeth” is difficult. Epinephrine aids anaesthesia by reducing blood absorption through local vasoconstriction. However, when epinephrine is contraindicated, cooling the anaesthetic may provide effective vasoconstriction in cutaneous arteries and inhibit sensory nerve action potentials, enhancing anaesthetic efficacy.Aim:To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative analgesics and cooling of 2% lidocaine solution with 1:200,000 Epinephrine on the efficacy of Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) during root canal treatment in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molars.Materials and methods:This study was conducted on 36 subjects diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Participants were randomly assigned into one of three groups, each consisting of 12 patients (n=12). The subjects in Group A (Control) received Vitamin E 400 mg tablets as premedication and Local Anaesthetic injection of 2% Lignocaine at room temperature. The subjects in Group B received Piroxicam 20 mg tablets as premedication and local anaesthetic injection of 2% Lignocaine at Room Temperature. The subjects in Group C received Piroxicam 20 mg tablets as premedication and local anaesthetic injection of 2% Lignocaine at 4° Celsius. The patient’s preoperative pain levels before and after administering the analgesic, before and after the administration of local anaesthesia and intraoperative pain levels were recorded using the Heft-Parker visual analogue scale. Anaesthetic success was again evaluated after re-initiation of the endodontic treatment. The heart rates of the patients were measured using a finger pulse oximeter.Results:The patients in group C showed the highest mean difference in pain levels followed by group B and A. However, the Group A patients displayed the highest heart rates followed by Groups B and C. One-way ANOVA showed a significant differences in the pain levels (p=0.0002) and heart rates (p=0.0004) among the groups.Conclusion:This study showed that Piroxicam effectively achieved IANB in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars. Cooling 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine to 4°C significantly reduced post-injection heart rate and enhanced anesthetic success.

A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Bilateral Ilioinguinal, Iliohypogastric Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Lower Segment Cesarean Section

A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Bilateral Ilioinguinal, Iliohypogastric Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Lower Segment Cesarean Section

Nurse-led ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block: A randomised controlled trial of two different patient flow systems in an emergency department

IntroductionElderly with hip fractures present complex challenges. Effective pain management is crucial for recovery and quality of life. However, pain control can be difficult and requires customized care. MethodsWe conducted an unblinded, randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block in patients with hip fracture performed by specially trained nurses (Group Nurse) compared to anaesthesiologists (Group Anaesthesiologist). The hypothesis was that a single shot ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block would result in a total summarized lower dynamic numeric rating scale score for pain intensity during the first 120 min after admission for patients in Group Nurse compared to Group Anaesthesiologist measured in five timepoints. The primary outcome was measured by a cumulative numeric rating scale score for dynamic pain (with flexion of the hip until maximum 30° from bed surface) during the first 120 min after admission to the emergency department. ResultsFrom February 2020 to June 2021, 263 patients were screened, of which 42 (16.0%) consented and were randomly allocated; 21 in each arm. The primary outcome was not different between groups (p = 0.24), and displayed no substantial superiority of specially trained nurses over anaesthesiologist. No complications or adverse effects were observed in either group. The use of systemic analgesics and the development of delirium was similar between the two groups. In the Nurse Group, patients were administered their ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block earlier. ConclusionOur study did not demonstrate a statistically significant beneficial effect of specially trained nurses over anaesthesiologist on cumulative pain in performing ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks, while no side-effects/complications or adverse effects were observed in either group. ClinicaltrialThe trial was registered on October 31, 2019 at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04145752).

Effect of Repeated Greater Occipital Nerve Block in Patients with Ocular Neuropathic Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study

Ocular neuropathic pain (ONP) has various etiologies, and patients have various symptoms. The clinical management of patients with ONP has been debated. We aimed to evaluate the effect of repeated greater occipital nerve block (GONB) on ONP based on convergence in the trigeminocervical complex. In this single-center retrospective study, the medical records of 204 patients who were referred to the pain clinic by the ophthalmology department of our hospital and subsequently underwent repeated GONB for chronic ONP between January 2008 and February 2022 were analyzed. They received GONB every two weeks, up to 10 times. Symptoms of ONP were divided into five categories: eye pain, dysesthesias/allodynia, non-eye pain, visual disturbance, and tearing. The primary outcome of this study was the pain relief scale (PRS) score after repeated injections. The differences and magnitude of decrease in the overall pain relief scale score were statistically significant (estimate = −0.55, p &lt; 0.001). There were two patients who had recurrence of ONP and seven patients who had adverse events. According to our study, repeated GONB can reduce symptom severity in patients with ONP. Therefore, it appears that GONB can be considered a multimodal management method for ONP.