Neohexane Research Articles

Molecular guest exchange and subsequent structural transformation in CH4 – CO2 replacement occurring in sH hydrates as revealed by 13C NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamic simulations

This study adopted experimental and computational approaches to investigate CH4 – CO2 replacement in the structure H (sH) CH4 + methylcyclopentane (MCP) hydrate for its dual functions of CH4 recovery and CO2 sequestration. Hydrate phase equilibria, 13C NMR spectra, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of CH4 + MCP – CO2 replacement were examined and compared with those of CH4 + neohexane (NH) – CO2 replacement to elucidate the molecular guest exchange behaviors in both systems. The structure I (sI) hydrates were thermodynamically favored in CO2-rich gas mixtures (CH4 + CO2 + MCP systems), and a structural transformation from sH to sI occurred when CO2 composition in the feed gas was higher than 20 %. The 13C NMR spectra indicated that the CO2 molecules preferred to occupy the large (51262) cages of sI and the medium (435663) cages of sH compared to the small (512) cages of both sI and sH during replacement. Following CO2 injection into the sH CH4 + MCP hydrate, the initial sH hydrate transformed to the sI hydrate with CH4 recovery of approximately 78 %. The MD simulations also demonstrated that structural transformation in the CH4 + MCP – CO2 replacement would occur at the lower CO2 enclathration ratio compared to the CH4 + NH – CO2 replacement, thereby leading to a lower CO2 concentration in the newly formed sI hydrate. This is the first study to provide both experimental and computational evidence of guest-dependent structural transformation in sH CH4 + liquid hydrocarbons – CO2 replacement.

Experimental Study on Hydrate Structure Transition Using an In Situ High-Pressure Powder X-ray Diffractometer: Application in CO2 Capture

Clathrate (gas) hydrates as materials have received great interest due to their high-density gas storage potential and separation applications for their ability to preferentially separate a targeted component such as CO2 from waste streams. Among the three clathrate hydrate structures, only sH (structure H) hydrates require a large molecule such as neohexane (NH) or tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME) as well as a “help-gas” molecule such as methane (CH4) to form a stable structure. However, attempts to use CO2 as a help-gas came up with mixed results where it appeared that the sH hydrate formed was stable only at temperatures below the ice point, whereas the compound formed with CH4 was considerably more stable. sH hydrates have considerable potential for gas separation, for instance, of CH4–CO2 mixtures. Thus, in this work, several compositions were tested for their hydrate forming ability. The large cage guests tested were NH and TBME, the help-gas mixtures were a CO2-rich mixture (76% CO2 and 24% CH4), and a CO2 lean mixture (24% CO2 and 76% CH4). The phase behavior of hydrates formed from the various combinations was tested by measuring the endo- and exotherms associated with hydrate formation and decomposition in a high-pressure differential calorimeter. The different phases indicated from the DSC results were identified by employing an in situ high-pressure cell on a powder X-ray diffractometer. Powder patterns were recorded to identify the crystal phase arising from nucleation and possible re-crystallization events after annealing. It was confirmed that the CO2 lean mixture (24% CO2 and 76% CH4) forms structure H (sH) hydrate, while the CO2-rich mixture (76% CO2 and 24% CH4) forms structure I (sI) hydrate presenting a structure transition pattern across the gas mixtures investigated. Further, it was observed that the CO2 lean mixture, which forms sH hydrate, also starts as sI hydrate and gradually converts to the thermodynamically stable sH hydrate. This study, in essence, helps to understand the preference of CH4 and CO2 for three different types of cages in sH hydrates and presents a design framework for a suitable gas separation mechanism for this gas mixture of interest.

Complex Phase Behaviors and Structural Coexistence of Natural Gas Hydrates Containing Large-Molecule Guest Substances

The complex phase behaviors and structural coexistence of natural gas hydrates (NGHs) that contain large-molecule guest substances (LMGSs) were examined for their significance in the exploration and exploitation of NGHs as well as natural gas storage and transportation. Methylcyclopentane (MCP) and 2,2-dimethylbutane [neohexane (NH)] were chosen as LMGSs, and the simplest composition of NGHs and natural gas was simulated by a gas mixture of CH4 (90%) + C2H6 (10%). The coexistence of structure II (sII) and structure H (sH) hydrates in the CH4 + C2H6 + LMGS + water mixtures was revealed by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). CH4 and LMGSs were captured in sH, whereas CH4 and C2H6 were enclathrated in sII. Endothermic heat flow curves, which were obtained by a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), and pressure (P)–temperature (T) traces exhibited two-step dissociation of formed gas hydrates (sH dissociation followed by sII dissociation). The experimental results for the PXRD patterns, 13C NMR spectra, phase equilibria, DSC heating curves, and P–T traces clearly demonstrated that the CH4 (90%) + C2H6 (10%) + LMGS + water mixtures formed both sII hydrates and sH hydrates and that the final hydrate structure at equilibrium dissociation points was sII.

Influence of Large Molecular Guest Species on the Formation of CH <sub>4</sub> and CO <sub>2</sub> Hydrates

Methane hydrates in nature are considered as a future energy resource for natural gas due to their abundance in nature. The presence of all three structures of clathrate hydrates in the nature have been reported. Structural transition in clathrate hydrates in particular with regards to sH hydrates and the influence of large guest molecules is still not well understood. In the current work, we synthesize mixed hydrate of CO2 & CH4 mixture in presence of sH formers, neo-hexane (NH) and tert-butylmethylether (TBME). High-pressure in-situ differential scanning calorimetry was employed to investigate the phase transformation between soild-liquid-gas. We confirmed that CO2 lean mixture (24% CO2 & 76% CH4) forms structure H (sH) hydrate, while CO2 rich mixture (76% CO2 & 24% CH4) forms structure I (sI) hydrate. This study presents new insights to understand the dynamic preference of methane and carbon dioxide in three different types of cages in sH hydrate.

Enhanced CH₄ Recovery Induced via Structural Transformation in the CH₄/CO₂ Replacement That Occurs in sH Hydrates.

The CH4/CO2 replacement that occurs in sH hydrates is investigated, with a primary focus on the enhanced CH4 recovery induced via structural transformation with a CO2 injection. In this study, neohexane (NH) is used as a liquid hydrocarbon guest in the sH hydrates. Direct thermodynamic measurements and spectroscopic identification are investigated to reveal the replacement process for recovering CH4 and simultaneously sequestering CO2 in the sH (CH4 + NH) hydrate. The hydrate phase behavior and the (13)C NMR and Raman spectroscopy results of the CH4 + CO2 + NH systems demonstrate that CO2 functions as a coguest of sH hydrates in CH4-rich conditions, and that the structural transition of sH to sI hydrates occurs in CO2-rich conditions. CO2 molecules are found to preferentially occupy the medium 4(3)5(6)6(3) cages of sH hydrates or the large 5(12)6(2) cages of sI hydrates during the replacement. Due to the favorable structural transition and resulting re-establishment of guest distributions, approximately 88% of the CH4 is recoverable from sH (CH4 + NH) hydrates with a CO2 injection. The hydrate dissociation and subsequent reformation caused by the structural transformation of sH to sI is also confirmed using a high-pressure microdifferential scanning calorimeter through the detection of the significant heat flows generated during the replacement.

Molecular dynamics simulation of structure H clathrate-hydrates of binary guest molecules

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are performed to study the stability of structure H clathrate-hydrates of methane+large-molecule guest substance (LMGS) at temperatures of 270, 273, 278 and 280 K under canonical (NVT-) ensemble condition in a 3×3×3 structure H unit cell replica with 918 TIP4P water molecules. The studied LMGS are 2-methylbutane (2-MB), 2,3-dimethylbutane (2,3-DMB), neohexane (NH), methylcyclohexane (MCH), adamantane and tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME). In the process of MD simulation, achieving equilibrium of the studied system is recognized by stability in calculated pressure for NVT-ensemble. So, for the accuracy of MD simulations, the obtained pressures are compared with the experimental phase diagrams. Therefore, the obtained equilibrium pressures by MD simulations are presented for studying the structure H clathrate-hydrates. The results show that the calculated temperature and pressure conditions by MD simulations are consistent with the experimental phase diagrams. Also, the radial distribution functions (RDFs) of host-host, host-guest and guest-guest molecules are used to analysis the characteristic configurations of the structure H clathrate-hydrate.

Inhibition of Natural Gas Hydrates in the Presence of Liquid Hydrocarbons Forming Structure H

The effects of LMGS (large molecule guest substance) amount on the thermodynamics of natural gas hydrates, as well as structural characteristics of mixed hydrates of LMGS and natural gas, have been studied. The addition of 1.7 wt % neohexane (NH) to water induced inhibition of natural gas hydrates, and this inhibition effect increased with increased addition of NH up to 7.8 wt %. However, the hydrate equilibrium condition changed slightly when the concentration of NH further increased from 7.8 to 14.5 wt %. Investigations on structural characteristics were carried out by analyzing (13)C NMR spectra of mixed hydrates formed from the mixture of natural gas and NH. They indicate that two hydrate structures of II and H coexist simultaneously, and the ratio of structure H to II decreased from 0.97 to 0.43 when the NH concentration decreased from 14.5 to 7.8 wt %. In addition, it was confirmed that ethane, propane, and iso-butane gas molecules do not participate in the formation of structure H and only enclathrated in large cages of structure II. These results indicate the existence of multiple hydrate structures, which must be considered in many industrial applications when mixed hydrates are formed from multicomponent gas mixtures and liquid hydrocarbons.

Guest–Host Hydrogen Bonding in Structure H Clathrate Hydrates

The formation of guest-host hydrogen bonds in structure H (sH) clathrate hydrates is studied herein. We contrast the structure and guest dynamics of the tert-butylmethylether (TBME) and neohexane (NH) sH clathrates by performing molecular dynamics simulations on these two clathrates and measuring (1)H and (13)C NMR relaxation times of the guests. These two guests are isoelectronic and differ with respect to the presence of the ether oxygen atom in TBME and a CH(2) group in NH. The TBME guest forms long-lived hydrogen bonds with water molecules in the equatorial region of the large sH clathrate cage. These hydrogen bonds effectively tether the TBME guest to the side of the cage and restrict its rattling and rotational motions in the cage compared to NH, which does not become hydrogen bonded to the cage's water molecules.

Interactions between Structure H Hydrate Formers and Water Molecules

Studies on methane storage in hexagonal structure H (sH) hydrates reveal that hydrate stability conditions, formation rates, and cage occupancies differ for the three large molecule guest substances (LMGSs) studied: tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME), neo-hexane (NH), and methyl-cyclohexane (MCH). In this work, the structures of aqueous solutions with the LMGS are examined with molecular dynamics to gain insights into the interactions between water and LMGS. Water molecules form solvation cavities that follow the contours of the LMGS molecules and have diameters between 4 and 7 Å. The cavity size increases from TBME < NH < MCH, and the nearest water molecules to the LMGS have a local density that is higher by a factor of 2 than that of the bulk water phase. Water molecules interact strongly with the ether oxygen of TBME but not with other atoms in the LMGS molecules. This strong attraction gives TBME a greater solubility in water and better wetting on ice than NH or MCH. Moreover, TBME also has a larger diffusivity than NH in water. The greater contact between TBME and the host water molecules may cause the faster rate of initial hydrate growth from solid ice particles (fixed bed) or liquid water with mixing for this guest species. However, the strong attraction of the TBME molecule with water may also slow down the subsequent crystal growth and may perhaps limit the occupancy of the other guests (methane) in the sH clathrate. The volume change due to solvation is negative for all three LMGSs. This suggests a more compact hydrogen bond network in the hydration shell that may facilitate the formation of clathrates when a hydrate seed is available and when mass and heat transfer resistances are negligible. For example, this may occur during hydrate formation from a fixed ice bed with temperature ramping. Hence, the clathrate growth with hydrophobic guests (NH and MCH) proceeds rapidly toward completion as the temperature is increased above the ice melting point. On the other hand, the formation of hydrate cages for the TBME system is disrupted because of the strong water−solute interactions. Consequently, hydrate formation from ice with thermal ramping with TBME is slower.

Methane conversion rate into structure H hydrate crystals from ice

AbstractThe methane uptake and conversion rate to structure H (sH) hydrates was measured and compared to crystallization kinetics models. Three large molecule guest substances (LMGS) were used as sH hydrate formers: neohexane (NH), methylcyclohexane (MCH), and tert‐butyl methyl ether ( TBME). The initial crystallization occurred quickly at the LMGS liquid‐ice interface until ∼20–30% of ice was converted into hydrate (hydrate growth stage I). Slower hydrate crystal growth was observed after a hydrate film covered the ice surface at a rate of 3–400 nm2/h (hydrate growth stage II). The TBME system showed the fastest kinetics at the beginning of the reaction followed by NH and MCH system. However the trend changed when the temperature was increased (“reaction” stage III). Surprisingly, the conversion rate achieved with the TBME system upon melting the ice was the smallest. This was attributed to the strong interaction of TBME with water molecules that increased the energy barrier for water molecules to form hydrate cages. The conversion rates were well correlated with the Avrami equation and the shrinking core model. Finally, NH was found to be the best LMGS in this study to obtain full conversion within a short reaction time and achieving high methane gas storage in the hydrate. © 2007 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2007

Olefins from Neohexane and Diisopropyl

Olefins from Neohexane and Diisopropyl