Neoadjuvant Treatment Research Articles

Intraoperative Frozen Section Evaluation of Pancreatic Specimens and Related Liver Lesions.

Frozen sections are essential in the surgical management of patients, especially those with pancreatic masses, because frozen sections can provide answers intraoperatively and aid in treatment decisions. Pancreas frozen sections are challenging because of the small tissue size, processing artifacts, neoadjuvant treatment effects, and concurrent pancreatitis-like obstructive changes. The authors present a review of intraoperative evaluation of pancreatic specimens. To provide an approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma on frozen sections and to discuss commonly encountered pitfalls. Indications for pancreas frozen sections and specific margin evaluation will be discussed. We will also review frozen section diagnosis of subcapsular liver lesions and tumors other than metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Data sources included a literature review and the personal experiences of the authors. The features for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma include disordered architecture, glands at abnormal locations, and atypical cytology. It is important to be aware of the pitfalls and clues on frozen section. The evaluation of resection margins can be challenging, and in the setting of the resection of cystic tumors, the key is the diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia or cancer. Finally, it is vital to remember the differential diagnosis for subcapsular liver lesions because not all lesions will be metastases of adenocarcinomas or bile duct adenomas. Frozen sections remain a useful tool for the intraoperative management of patients with pancreatic tumors.

Prognostic significance of HER2 loss after HER2-targeted neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer

Loss of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression can be seen in almost 25–30 % patients after HER2 receptor directed neoadjuvant treatment. These patients have unclear clinical outcomes in previous studies. We aimed to investigate the importance of HER2 loss, additionally with predictive factors for the loss of HER2. This was a retrospective and multicenter study that included 272 HER2-positive BC patients with no pathological complete response who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted treatments. The factors that may affect the loss of HER2 detected by immunohistochemistry(IHC) and the association with survival were analyzed.The rate of HER2 loss after neoadjuvant treatments(NAT) was 27.9 % (n = 76). Disease recurrence was observed in 18(23.7 %) patients with HER2 loss, while it was detected in 62 (31.7 %) patients without HER2 loss(p = 0.23). Pre and post-NAT ER status, and post-NAT ki-67 status had a significant impact on disease-free survival(DFS) (p = 0.0012, p = 0.004, and p = 0.04, respectively).There were no significant association between DFS and loss of HER2 (p = 0.64) and dual anti-HER2 blockade (p = 0.21). Pre-NAT clinical stage (HR:1.65 p = 0.013), post-NAT LN status (HR:3.18, p = 0.02) and pre-NAT ER status (HR:0.24, p = 0.041) were significant independent prognostic factors for DFS while post-NAT residual disease in axillar tissue was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR:1.54 p = 0.019). Moreover, age (<40 years vs ≥40 years) (p = 0.031) and tumor grade (p = 0.004) were predictive factors for HER2 loss. Our results showed that HER2 loss did not affect survivals. However, young age and being high grade tumor may predict HER2 loss.

Challenges and considerations in interpreting the age-dependent benefit of neoadjuvant treatment for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

Challenges and considerations in interpreting the age-dependent benefit of neoadjuvant treatment for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

Comparison of anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free regimens in neoadjuvant HER-2 positive breast cancer treatment

While some clinics have adopted abbreviated neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, there remains a shortage of comprehensive clinical data to support this practice. This is a retrospective, multicenter study. A total of 142 patients were included in the study who are HER2-positive breast cancer, aged ≤ 65 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery at 10 different oncology centers in Türkiye between October 2016 and December 2022. The treatment arms were divided into 4–6 cycles of docetaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab for arm A, 4 cycles of adriamycin/cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of taxane/TP for arm B. There were 50 patients (35.2%) in arm A and 92 patients (64.8%) in arm B. The median follow-up of all of the patients was 19.9 months (95% CI 17.5–22.3). The 3-year DFS rates for treatment arms A and B were 90.0% and 83.8%, respectively, and the survival outcomes between the groups were similar (p = 0.34). Furthermore, the pathologic complete response rates were similar in both treatment arms, at 50.0% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.90). This study supports shortened neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, a common practice in some clinics.

Choice of adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer in real clinical practice: analysis of physician preferences in the Russian Federation

Adjuvant therapy with trastuzumab made a significant contribution to improving disease-free and overall survival rates in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. However, in a number of clinical situations the risk of disease recurrence remains increased. Carrying out neoadjuvant treatment followed by post-neoadjuvant therapy, depending on the degree of pathomorphological response, is the modern standard, allowing to cure a significantly larger number of patients. This became possible thanks to the expansion of the arsenal of terget anti-Her drugs and the introduction into real clinical practice of double anti-HER2 blockade (trastuzumab + pertuzumab) and an antibody conjugate with a cytostatic drug – trastuzumab emtansine. To assess actual clinical practice in the Russian Federation, a survey study “Therapy of HER2-positive breast cancer” was conducted. The survey involved 50 specialists from different regions of the country who are directly involved in developing a treatment plan for patients, which allows them to reflect the preferences of leading chemotherapists regarding tactics for HER2-positive breast cancer. This publication reflects the results of part of the survey, devoted to the choice of adjuvant and post-neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Identified a clear positive trend in favor of neoadjuvant treatment followed by post-neoadjuvant therapy using modern targeted drugs such as pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine. The survey results show that 68% of patients with RCB-II–III residual tumor receive post-neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtanzine, in 2021 this figure was only 24%. The absolute majority of patients who have not received neoadjuvant therapy, but have N2–3 stage, receive double anti-HER2 therapy with trastuzumab + pertuzumab in the adjuvant setting. High adherence to the therapy was noted, as 97% of patients complete the planned course of T-DM1, and 91.2% of patients complete a year of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. These figures are noticeably higher than the indicators of registration studies. Issues of effectiveness come to the fore in choosing therapy. Issues of drug availability remain relevant, but are not decisive. The survey also revealed factors that were not obvious at first glance and influenced treatment results.

Effect of Tumor Regression Grade on Survival and Disease-Free Interval in Patients Operated on for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and women in our population. In this regard, rectal cancer accounts for more than half of colorectal cancer deaths, and its incidence is expected to increase in the coming years. There have been significant changes in neoadjuvant therapy regimens, with promising results, as demonstrated by the recent RAPIDO and PRODIGE23 studies. Around 40% of patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer show some degree of response to neoadjuvant treatment, with complete tumor regression observed in up to one in five patients. Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational study. A total of 181 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery were analyzed. Clinical and pathological data were collected from the patients, including assessment of tumor regression through histopathological studies after surgery. The Mandard tumor regression grading system was used to categorize tumor response into different grades. Results: The results showed a significant association between the degree of tumor regression and several important clinical outcomes. Specifically, patients with higher tumor regression had significantly better disease-free survival than those with less regression (p = 0.004). In addition, tumor regression was also correlated with the incidence of local recurrence (p = 0.018) and distant metastasis (p = 0.032). These associations suggest that tumor responsiveness to neoadjuvant therapy may influence the long-term progression of the disease. Regarding tumor deposits and the presence of lymphadenopathy, these factors were also found to be significantly associated with clinical outcomes. Patients with tumor deposits had a higher incidence of local recurrence (p = 0.025) and distant metastases (p = 0.041), while the presence of lymphadenopathy increased the risk of local recurrence (p = 0.013). These findings highlight the importance of evaluating not only tumor regression but also other pathological markers to predict prognosis and guide clinical management. Conclusions: The degree of tumor regression was not an independent predictor of survival compared to other variables such as nodal stage and presence of tumor deposits. This indicates that while tumor regression is an important factor, other elements also play a crucial role in determining the prognosis of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This study provides additional evidence for the importance of tumor regression, tumor deposits, and lymphadenopathy as predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Association between BMI and oncologic outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer: a predictors-matched case-control study.

We aimed to study the association between obesity and survival in ovarian cancer (OC) patients, accounting for confounders as disease stage, histology, and comorbidities. Retrospective matched case-control study of consecutive patients, with epithelial OC. Obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg m-2) patients were matched in a 1:4 ratio with patients having lower BMIs (BMI < 35 kg m-2) based on disease stage, cytoreduction state, tumor histology and ASA score. We compared the 3-year and total recurrence-free survival and overall survival through Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards. Overall, 153 consecutive patients were included, of whom 32 (20.9%) had a BMI ≥ 35. and 121 a BMI < 35. The median follow-up time was 39 months (interquartile range 18-67). Both study groups were similar in multiple prognostic factors, including American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, completion of cytoreduction, histology and stage of disease (p = 0.981, p = 0.992, p = 0.740 and p = 0.984, respectively). Ninety-five (62.1%) patients underwent robotic surgery and conversion rate from robotic to laparotomy was similar in both groups 2 (6.3%) in obese group vs. 6 (5.0%) in lower BMI patients, p = 0.673. During the follow-up time, the rate of recurrence was similar in both groups; 21 (65.6%) in obese group vs. 68 (57.1%), p = 0.387 and the rate of death events was similar; 16 (50.0%) in obese group vs. 49 (40.5%), p = 0.333). The 3-year OS was higher in the obese group (log rank p = 0.042) but the 3-year RFS was similar in both groups (log rank p = 0.556). Median total OS was similar in both groups 62 months (95% confidence interval 25-98 months) in obese vs. 67 months (95% confidence interval 15-118) in the lower BMI group, log rank p = 0.822. Median RFS was similar in both groups; 61 months (95% confidence interval 47-74) in obese, vs. 54 (95% confidence interval 43-64), log rank p = 0.842. In Cox regression analysis for OS, including obesity, age, laparotomy and neoadjuvant treatment - only neoadjuvant treatment was independently associated with longer OS: odds ratio 1.82 (95% confidence interval 1.09-3.05) and longer RFS: odds ratio 2.16 (95% confidence interval 1.37-3.41). In the present study on consecutive cases of ovarian cancer, obesity did not seem to be associated with outcome, except for an apparent improved 3-year survival that faded away thereafter.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Advances in systemic therapies

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is traditionally associated with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Sorafenib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was introduced in 2007 as a first-in-class systemic agent for advanced HCC. After sorafenib, a range of targeted therapies and immunotherapies have demonstrated survival benefits in the past 5 years, revolutionizing the treatment landscape of advanced HCC. More recently, evidence of novel combinations of systemic agents with distinct mechanisms has emerged. In particular, combination trials on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab have shown encouraging efficacy. Hence, international societies have revamped their guidelines to incorporate new recommendations for these novel systemic agents. Aside from treatment in advanced HCC, the indications for systemic therapy are expanding. For example, the combination of systemic therapeutics with locoregional therapy (trans-arterial chemoembolization or stereotactic body radiation therapy) has demonstrated promising early results in downstaging HCC. Recent trials have also explored the role of systemic therapy as neoadjuvant treatment for borderline-resectable HCC or as adjuvant treatment to reduce recurrence risk after curative resection. Despite encouraging results from clinical trials, the real-world efficacy of systemic agents in specific patient subgroups (such as patients with advanced cirrhosis, high bleeding risk, renal impairment, or cardiometabolic diseases) remains uncertain. The effect of liver disease etiology on systemic treatment efficacy warrants further research. With an increased understanding of the pathophysiological pathways and accumulation of clinical data, personalized treatment decisions will be possible, and the field of systemic treatment for HCC will continue to evolve.

Chemoradiotherapy versus surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC: a real-world multicenter retrospective study

PurposeThe optimal treatment after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy and surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III NSCLC.Materials and methodsWe conducted a real-world multicenter retrospective study on patients with stage III NSCLC who received surgery or chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between October 2018 and December 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the initiation of neoadjuvant treatment and estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to examine potential prognostic factors. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to further minimize confounding.ResultsA total of 239 eligible patients were enrolled, with 104 (43.5%) receiving surgery and 135 (56.5%) receiving CRT. After 1:1 PSM, 1- and 2-year PFS rates in patients receiving radical surgery (rSurgery group) vs. patients receiving definitive cCRT (dCCRT group) were 80.0% vs. 79.2% and 67.2% vs. 53.1%, respectively (P = 0.774). One- and 2-year OS rates were 97.5% vs. 97.4% and 87.3% vs. 89.9%, respectively (P = 0.558). Patients in the dCCRT group had a numerically lower incidence of distant metastases compared to those in the rSurgery group (42.9% vs. 70.6%, P = 0.119). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in both groups, except that the incidence of grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was significantly higher in the dCCRT group (30.0% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.025).ConclusionFollowing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy may achieve noninferior outcomes to radical surgery in stage III NSCLC.

Periarterial and Sub-adventitial Divestment Along with Triangle Operation and RAMPS for Pancreatic Body Cancer.

Locally advanced cancers of the pancreatic body can abut or involve the celiac axis, hepatic artery, or superior mesenteric artery. Recent evidence suggests that these tumors are amenable to surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Hackert et al., Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX results in resectability in 60 % of the patients. Ann Surg 264:457-463, 2016; Rangelova et al., Surgery improves survival after neoadjuvant therapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. Ann Surg 273:579-86, 2021). An arterial divestment technique can be used for these cancers to get an R0 clearance, thereby avoiding morbid arterial resections (Miao et al., Arterial divestment instead of resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Pancreatology 16:S59, 2016; Habib et al., Periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: surgical planning with the "halo sign" and "string sign." Surgery 169(5):1026-1031, 2021; Diener et al., Periarterial divestment in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgery 169(5):1026-31, 2020). Two techniques are described for arterial divestment. In the periarterial divestment technique, the plane of the dissection is between the tumor and the adventitia (Habib et al., Periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: surgical planning with the "halo sign" and "string sign." Surgery 169(5):1026-1031, 2021; Diener et al., Periarterial divestment in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgery 169(5):1026-31, 2020). In sub-adventitial dissection, the plane of dissection is between the tunica adventitia and the external elastic lamina (Gao et al., Sub-adventitial divestment technique for resecting artery-involved pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406:691-701, 2021). The TRIANGLE operation also is one of the surgical techniques to achieve R0 resection in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (Hackert et al., The TRIANGLE operation: radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-arm observational study. HPB Oxford 19:1001-1007, 2017). This multimedia article aims to demonstrate peri-arterial and sub-adventitial divestment techniques as well as the TRIANGLE operation for a locally advanced cancer of the body of the pancreas. The video also highlights the technique of posterior radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy (RAMPS) together with lymph node clearance. A 57-year-old women was detected to have pancreatic body adenocarcinoma with tumor contact of the artery and superior mesenteric artery. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, she was planned to undergo surgical resection. The surgical technique consisted of peri-arterial and sub-adventitial divestment, the TRIANGLE operation and RAMPS (Fig. 1). The procedure was performed within 240 min and involved blood loss of 250 mL. After the procedure, pancreatic leak (POPF-B), chyle leak and diarrhea developed, which were managed conservatively. The final histopathology showed residual, viable, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (ypT2N1M0) with all resection margins free. The surgical technique consisting of peri-arterial and sub-adventitial divestment, the TRIANGLE operation and RAMPS helps in R0 resection of locally advanced pancreatic body cancer without any compromise in oncologic outcomes and offers an alternative surgical approach to morbid arterial resection.

Oncologic Outcomes for Different Axillary Staging Techniques in Patients with Nodal-Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systematic Treatment: A Cancer Registry Study.

Targeted approaches such as targeted axillary dissection (TAD) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) showed false-negative rates of < 10% compared with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with nodal-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST). We aimed to evaluate real-world oncologic outcomes for different axillary staging techniques. We identified nodal-positive breast cancer patients undergoing NAST from 2016 to 2021 from the state cancer registry of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and multivariate Cox regression models (adjusted for age, ypN stage, ypT stage, and tumor biologic subtype). A total of 2698 patients with a median follow-up of 24.7 months were identified: 2204 underwent ALND, 460 underwent SLNB (255 with ≥ 3 sentinel lymph nodes [SLNs] removed, 205 with 1-2 SLNs removed), and 34 underwent TAD. iDFS 3 years after surgery was 69.7% (ALND), 76.6% (SLNB with ≥ 3 SLNs removed), 76.7% (SLNB with < 3 SLNs removed), and 78.7% (TAD). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant influence of different axillary staging techniques on iDFS (hazard ratio [HR] for SLNB with < 3 SLNs removed 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.50; HR for SLNB with ≥ 3 SLNs removed 0.86, 95% CI 0.56-1.3; HR for TAD 0.23, 95% CI 0.03-1.64; ALND reference), and for ypN+ (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.49-2.49), triple-negative breast cancer (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.80-3.06), and ypT3-4 (HR 2.93, 95% CI 2.02-4.24). These real-world data provide evidence that patient selection for de-escalated axillary surgery for patients with nodal-positive breast cancer undergoing NAST was successfully adopted and no early alarm signals of iDFS detriment were detected.

Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: study protocol for cohort C of the open-label, phase 2, randomized controlled multicenter OPAL trial

BackgroundMaintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to extend progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of biomarker status. However, there are limited data on niraparib’s efficacy and safety in the neoadjuvant setting. The objective of Cohort C of the OPAL trial (OPAL-C) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoadjuvant niraparib treatment compared with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with confirmed homologous recombination–deficient tumors.MethodsOPAL is an ongoing global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. In OPAL-C, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive three 21-day cycles of either neoadjuvant niraparib or platinum-taxane doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy per standard of care. Patients with a complete or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) will then undergo interval debulking surgery; patients with stable disease may proceed to interval debulking surgery or alternative therapy at the investigator’s discretion. Patients with disease progression will exit the study treatment and proceed to alternative therapy at the investigator’s discretion. After interval debulking surgery, all patients will receive up to three 21-day cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy for up to 36 months. Adult patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer eligible to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery may be enrolled. Patients must have tumors that are homologous recombination–deficient. The primary endpoint is the pre–interval debulking surgery unconfirmed overall response rate, defined as the investigator-assessed percentage of patients with unconfirmed complete or partial response on study treatment before interval debulking surgery per RECIST v1.1.DiscussionOPAL-C explores the use of niraparib in the neoadjuvant setting as an alternative to neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy to improve postsurgical residual disease outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer with homologous recombination–deficient tumors. Positive findings from this approach could significantly impact preoperative ovarian cancer therapy, particularly for patients who are ineligible for primary debulking surgery.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574779. Registered on February 28, 2022.

Residual Axillary Metastases in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Register-Based Study.

Lymph node (LN) metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) generally warrants axillary lymph node dissection, which opposes guidelines of upfront surgery in many cases. We investigated the risk of having additional metastases in the axilla when the LNs removed by targeted axillary dissection (TAD) harbored metastases after NACT. We aimed to identify subgroups suitable for de-escalated axillary treatment. This register-based study used data from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group database. Data were analyzed with logistic regression models. The primary outcome was the metastatic burden in non-TAD LNs in patients with positive TAD LNs after NACT. Among 383 patients, < 66.6% positive TAD LNs (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.62), only isolated tumor cells (ITCs) [OR 0.11, 95% CI < 0.01-0.82], and breast pathological complete response (pCR) [OR 0.07, 95% CI < 0.01-0.56] were associated with a low risk of having more than three positive non-TAD LNs. In 315 patients with fewer than three positive non-TAD LNs, the proportion of positive TAD LNs (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.76 for 33.3-66.6% vs. > 66.6%), size of the TAD LN metastasis (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.54 for ITC vs. macrometastasis), tumor size at diagnosis (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.64 for 20-49mm vs. ≥ 50mm) and breast pCR (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.96) were associated with residual LN metastases in the axilla. Breast pCR or ITC only in TAD LNs can, with reasonable certainty, preclude more than three positive non-TAD LNs. Additionally, patients with only ITCs in the TAD LN had a low risk of having any non-TAD LN metastases after NACT. De-escalated axillary treatment may be considered in both subgroups.

The Current Role of Radiation in the Management of Cholangiocarcinoma-A Narrative Review.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare cancer of bile ducts. It is associated with a poor prognosis. The incidence of CCA is rising worldwide. Anatomical subgroups have been used to classify patients for treatment and prognosis. There is a growing understanding of clinically important distinctions based on underlying genetic differences that lead to different treatment options and outcomes. Its management is further complicated by a heterogeneous population and relative rarity, which limits the conduct of large trials to guide management. Surgery has been the primary method of therapy for localized disease; however, recurrence and death remain high with or without surgery. Therefore, there have been concerted efforts to investigate new treatment options, such as the use of neoadjuvant treatments to optimize surgical outcomes, targeted therapy, leveraging a new understanding of immunobiology and stereotactic radiation. In this narrative review, we address the evidence to improve suboptimal outcomes in unresectable CCA with radiation, as well as the role of radiation in neoadjuvant and postoperative treatment. We also briefly discuss the recent developments in systemic treatment with targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Current role and perspectives of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review of the past 20years.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a significant global health challenge, and liver transplantation (LT) remains the best curative option. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) emerged as a potential solution to organ scarcity, reducing waitlist times. This comprehensive review explores LDLT practices, focusing on patient selection criteria and oncologic outcomes. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines included 50 studies (2004-2023) with 8062 patients. Data encompassed baseline characteristics, HCC features, and oncologic outcomes. Further analysis categorized results by geography and publication year. Heterogeneity in patient demographics, tumor burden, and transplant characteristics was observed. Recent LDLT series demonstrated a shift towards refined selection criteria, increased neoadjuvant treatment, and improved oncologic outcomes. Geographic disparities revealed unique challenges in Eastern and Western practices. LDLT proves effective for HCC, addressing donor shortages. Evolving practices highlight the importance of refining inclusion criteria and optimizing tumor management. While geographic differences exist, LDLT, when judiciously applied, offers promising outcomes.

Machine-learning and mechanistic modeling of metastatic breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment.

Clinical trials involving systemic neoadjuvant treatments in breast cancer aim to shrink tumors before surgery while simultaneously allowing for controlled evaluation of biomarkers, toxicity, and suppression of distant (occult) metastatic disease. Yet neoadjuvant clinical trials are rarely preceded by preclinical testing involving neoadjuvant treatment, surgery, and post-surgery monitoring of the disease. Here we used a mouse model of spontaneous metastasis occurring after surgical removal of orthotopically implanted primary tumors to develop a predictive mathematical model of neoadjuvant treatment response to sunitinib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (RTKI). Treatment outcomes were used to validate a novel mathematical kinetics-pharmacodynamics model predictive of perioperative disease progression. Longitudinal measurements of presurgical primary tumor size and postsurgical metastatic burden were compiled using 128 mice receiving variable neoadjuvant treatment doses and schedules (released publicly at https://zenodo.org/records/10607753). A non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach quantified inter-animal variabilities in metastatic dynamics and survival, and machine-learning algorithms were applied to investigate the significance of several biomarkers at resection as predictors of individual kinetics. Biomarkers included circulating tumor- and immune-based cells (i.e., circulating tumor cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells) as well as immunohistochemical tumor proteins (i.e., CD31 and Ki67). Our computational simulations show that neoadjuvant RTKI treatment inhibits primary tumor growth but has little efficacy in preventing (micro)-metastatic disease progression after surgery and treatment cessation. Machine learning algorithms that included support vector machines, random forests, and artificial neural networks, confirmed a lack of definitive biomarkers, which shows the value of preclinical modeling studies to identify potential failures that should be avoided clinically.

Pan-Canadian Analysis of Practice Patterns in Small Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey

Small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNECC) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis, with limited data to guide its treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in the management of SCNECC. A 23-question online survey on management of SCNECC was disseminated to Canadian gynecologic oncologists (GO), radiation oncologists (RO) and medical oncologists (MO). In total, 34 practitioners from eight provinces responded, including 17 GO, 13 RO and four MO. During staging and diagnosis, 74% of respondents used a trimodality imaging approach, and 85% tested for neuroendocrine markers. In early-stage (1A1-1B2) SCNECC, 87% of practitioners used a surgical-based approach with various adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments. In locally advanced (1B3-IVA) SCNECC, 53% favored primary chemoradiation, with cisplatin and etoposide, with the remainder using surgical or radiation-based approaches. In metastatic and recurrent SCNECC, the most common first-line regimen was etoposide and platinum, and 63% of practitioners considered clinical trials in the first line setting or beyond. This survey highlights diverse practice patterns in the treatment of SCNECC. Interdisciplinary input is crucial to individualizing multimodality treatment, and there is a need for prospective trials and intergroup collaboration to define the optimal approach towards managing this rare cancer type.

[Outcome of surgery after total neoadjuvant treatment in comparison to standard chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer: a meta-analysis].

[Outcome of surgery after total neoadjuvant treatment in comparison to standard chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer: a meta-analysis].

Abstract PO3-01-09: Results of a prospective observational study evaluating the impact of the Prosigna assay on neoadjuvant treatment decision-making in patients with early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer

Abstract Background. Prosigna (PAM50) is an FDA-approved prognostic test that measures the expression of 50 classifier genes in breast cancer tissue samples. It provides intrinsic subtyping, which classifies the biology of an individual patient's tumor, as well as a risk of recurrence (ROR) score that predicts the probability of distant recurrence over 10 years. Currently, the Prosigna assay is only approved for use in postoperative specimens. Given studies demonstrating that Prosigna can identify tumors that are more likely to benefit from chemotherapy, this decision-impact study sought to evaluate whether the assay could influence physicians' choices and patients' confidence in the neoadjuvant treatment plan. Methods. This prospective observational study was conducted at a single institution and included patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer measuring ≥ 0.5 cm, any nodal status, who were deemed candidates for neoadjuvant systemic treatment based on physician’s choice. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded core biopsy specimens were centrally analyzed using Prosigna. Patients' tumors were classified according to intrinsic tumor subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like) and ROR score (low, intermediate, or high). Physicians and patients were surveyed before and after performing Prosigna, regarding neoadjuvant therapy recommendations. The primary endpoint was assessment of the effect of Prosigna on oncologists' treatment recommendations and the actual treatment received (neoadjuvant hormonal therapy [NAHT], neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NACT], or upfront surgery). Secondary endpoints included determining whether treatment changes were based on ROR score, intrinsic subtype, or both, as well as assessing physicians' and patients' confidence in the treatment plan. Results. A total of 54 patients were enrolled in the study between March 2019 and April 2023. The distribution of intrinsic tumor subtypes was as follows: 15 patients (28%) had a Luminal A subtype, 34 (63%) had a Luminal B subtype, 3 (6%) had a HER2-enriched subtype, and 2 (4%) had a Basal-like subtype. Thirty-three patients (61%) were classified as ROR-low, 11 (20%) as ROR-intermediate, and 10 (19%) as ROR-high. Out of the 43 patients who had both pre- and post-assay survey results available, a change in the treatment decision was observed in 28% of cases. Specifically, 14% of patients transitioned from NAHT to NACT, 7% from NACT to NAHT, and 5% from NACT to upfront surgery, as shown in the Table. Treatment changes were based on the ROR score, intrinsic subtype, and both in 33%, 3%, and 64% of cases, respectively. Overall, 45% of physicians experienced an increase in confidence for the treatment plan after Prosigna testing, while 16% reported a decrease and 39% maintained the same level of confidence. Sixty-two percent of patients experienced a reduction in anxiety about treatment. Associations of ROR score and intrinsic subtypes will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion. Prosigna performed on presurgical core biopsies influenced oncologists' treatment recommendations regarding neoadjuvant treatment and reduced patient anxiety about treatment among patients with early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Table. Neoadjuvant treatment recommendations before and after Prosigna assay, overall and according to nodal status. Data are presented as frequencies (%). Abbreviations: NACT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NAHT, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Citation Format: Chiara Corti, Xiangying Chu, Pedro Exman, Danielle Kline, Nolan Priedigkeit, Nabihah Tayob, Erica Mayer, Adrienne Waks, Melissa Hughes, Antonio Giordano, Giuseppe Curigliano, Nancy Lin, Tari King, Rinath Jeselsohn, Deborah Dillon, Elizabeth Mittendorf, Sara Tolaney. Results of a prospective observational study evaluating the impact of the Prosigna assay on neoadjuvant treatment decision-making in patients with early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-01-09.

Abstract PO1-27-07: Is HER2-low a biologically distinct breast cancer (BC) subtype? Prognosis and pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in early breast cancer (BC) HER2 negative

Abstract Background: Overexpression of HER2 is a significant prognostic and predictive factor in early breast cancer. HER2 positive tumors are those scored by immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or 2+ with amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH). These tumors may benefit from HER2-targeted treatment and additionally, in early HER2-positive BC, achieving a complete pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment improves patient survival. In recent years, new anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates have proven effective for HER2 low BC (defined as IHC score 1+ or 2+ not amplified) in the metastatic disease setting; however, in HER2-low early BC, studies testing novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates as neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are ongoing. Currently, we don´t know exactly whether HER2 expression can influence the pathological response rate after NAT or disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients compared to HER2-zero (IHC 0). The aim of our study is to determine the impact on response rate to NAT and survival outcomes in early HER2-negative BC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in two hospitals in Andalucia, Spain. Patients with early HER2 negative BC treated with NAT from January 2015 to June 2022 were included. Patients were divided into HER2 low patients (IHC 1+ or 2+ not amplified) and HER2 0 (IHC 0). We collected clinical and pathological characteristics, pathological response rate using the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) system where a complete pathological response (pCR) was defined as ypT0/ypTis and ypN0, and survival outcomes. The primary objective of the study was to analyze the pCR rate after NAT according to HER2 score, and secondary objectives were to assess disease-free survival and overall survival (DFS and OS rates). Results: 574 patients were included (100% women). 397 patients had hormone receptors (luminal BC) on these tumors, and 177 did not have them, i.e., triple-negative BC (TNBC). 225 patients were HER2-zero, and 312 patients were HER2-low (253/312 patients had luminal BC and 59/312 patients were TNBC). The pCR in HER2-low patients was 17.3% and 23.1% in HER2-zero patients (p=0.047). For luminal BC patients, the pCR was 16.7% in HER2-low tumors and 13.7% in HER2-zero tumors (p=0.29). Similarly, there was no difference in pCR rates in TNBC patients (45.8% in HER2-low and 53.8% in HER2-zero tumors, respectively, (p=0.958). The overall survival (OS) at 96 months was 88.7% (95% CI 85.6%-92%). Regarding survival outcomes, neither HER2 expression level was associated with higher 8-year DFS: 81.1% in HER2-low patients (95% CI 75.7%-86.8%) and 74.9% in HER2-zero patients (95% CI 62.3%-90.1%) p=0.64. There was no difference between histological subtypes at 8-years regarding DFS rate: 80.5% (95% CI 74.3%-87.2%) in luminal HER2-low patients and 76.3% (95% CI 60.8%-95.7%) in luminal HER2-zero patients, p=0.22; 83.8% in TNBC HER2-low (95% CI 74.5%-94.2%) and 77.5% in TNBC HER2-zero patients (95% CI 69.4%-86.6%) p=0.26. We also didn´t find significant differences in terms of OS. For HER2-low patients, the 8-year OS was 90.9% (95% CI 87%-94.9%) and for HER2-zero patients, it was 86.4% (95% CI 80.8%- 92.5%) p=0.46. There were also no differences in OS for different histological subgroups with an 8-year OS in luminal HER2-low breast cancer patients of 92.5% (95% CI 88%-96.7%) and 87% in HER2-zero (95% CI 78.9%-96.1%) p=0.91. In patients with triple-negative breast cancer phenotype, the OS was 84.2% for HER2-low (95% CI 74.5%-95.2%) and 85.3% for HER2-zero (95% CI 77.9%-93.4%) p=1. Conclusions: We found no difference in survival outcomes and response rate to conventional NAT between HER2-low and HER2-zero expression levels. Therefore, our data do not support the hypothesis of HER2-low as a biologically specific breast cancer subtype. Further research on this approach with HER2 antibody-drug conjugate schemes as an alternative to traditional NAT schemes is warranted. Citation Format: Ana Gil-Torralvo, Yeray Rodriguez, Alejandro Falcon, David Morales, Mónica Cejuela, Isabel Miras, Marta Amérigo, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Juan Bayo, Francisco Javier Salvador Bofill. Is HER2-low a biologically distinct breast cancer (BC) subtype? Prognosis and pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in early breast cancer (BC) HER2 negative [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-27-07.