Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Research Articles

Axillary Surgery for Patients With Residual Isolated Tumor Cells (ypN0i+) After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Early Breast Cancer.

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Pathomorphological examination of specimen after vacuum-assisted biopsy in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Introduction. Vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) of the tumor bed in the breast has shown promising results as a minimally invasive method for determining pCR. A significant disadvantage of VAB is the fragmentation of the obtained material and the lack of methods for determining generally accepted predictive and prognostic factors.The objective was to provide a description of the accumulated experience of histological examination of specimens obtained using VAB in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.Methods and materials. A single-center, prospective, non-randomized study included patients with unifocal breast cancer (cT1–2N0–1M0). Patients who achieved a complete clinical response (cCR) underwent VAB. Based on the results of histological examination, patients without signs of residual tumor (pCR, ypT0N0) did not undergo further surgical intervention. When residual tumor cells (ypTisN0-1, ypT1-2N0-1) were detected, standard breast surgery was performed.Results. 35 patients with a mean age of 48.3 (31–67) years were included in the analysis. The examination of VAB samples showed that 11 (31.4 %) patients had a residual tumor, and in 24 (68.6 %) patients, no tumor cells were detected (ypT0N0). According to the Miller-Payne system, 28 patients had a complete pathological response, which corresponds to Miller-Payne=5 and pathological stage ypT0/ypTis (24 patients ypT0N0, 3 patients ypTisN0 and 1 patient ypT0N1). In 3 patients with residual invasive tumor, the tumor response according to the Miller-Payne scale corresponded to grade 3. There was a statistically significant correlation between presence of residual tumor cells in the outer counter after VAB and presence of residual tumor cells in the postoperative histology after standard surgery (Х2 p=0.01, Fisher exact test p=0.048). In addition, there was a statistically significant correlation between hormone receptor status and the degree of tumor response when evaluated using the Pearson criterion (p=0.046). We observed the smallest discordance between the data of the control examination and the data of the histological conclusion when interpreting the results of mammolymphoscintigraphy (25 %) and if 3 out of 3 studies described a complete clinical regression (16.7%).Conclusions. The method used to evaluate histological material allows to obtain predictive and prognostic information necessary to clarify further treatment tactics in accordance with modern standards. It is necessary to conduct more largescale studies in this area to answer the question if this method can be used in routine clinical practice.

Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on prognosis in renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus

BackgroundThe standard treatment for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is complete surgical resection; however, this procedure is complex and carries high complication rates and perioperative mortality. Previous studies have explored preoperative multimodal therapy to reduce surgical difficulty, but limited evidence prevents guideline recommendations. This study aimed to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the prognosis of patients with RCC and IVC thrombus without distant metastasis. MethodsData from 2006 to 2024 on RCC patients with IVC thrombus undergoing radical nephrectomy plus IVC thrombus resection were collected. Patients received neoadjuvant therapy, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors, followed by surgery. Tumor size and thrombus height were assessed by computed tomography. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors predicting DFS. ResultsThirty-one patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NAC-Naive group) and 19 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NAC group) were analyzed. The NAC group showed significant reductions in primary renal tumor size and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio compared to the NAC-Naive group just before nephrectomy. The NAC group had significantly improved DFS and OS. Median DFS and OS were not reached in the NAC group compared to 26.3 months and 73.5 months, respectively, in the NAC-Naive group. The NAC group had a 2-year recurrence-free survival rate of 70.9% compared to 50.6% in the NAC-Naive group. Multivariate analysis identified a preoperative tumor size of 10 cm or larger and lack of neoadjuvant therapy as poor prognostic factors for DFS. ConclusionNeoadjuvant therapy significantly improves the prognosis of RCC patients with IVC thrombus. This therapy reduces surgical invasiveness and has a mid- to long-term preventive effect on recurrence. These findings support the potential benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in improving outcomes for this patient population.

Invasive disease-free survival and brain metastasis rates in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab

Patients with HER2(+) early breast cancer (EBC) receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) have poorer outcomes if they have residual disease (RD). We analyzed IDFS and brain metastasis (BM) rates in patients with HER2(+) EBC treated with NAST and report the outcomes of patients with HER2(−) RD. Patients with HER2(+) EBC who received NAST between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Jan 2022 were reviewed. IDFS was defined as the time from surgery until first occurrence of invasive breast cancer recurrence, distant recurrence, or death from any cause. The total cohort was 594 patients. pCR (ypT0/isN0) was achieved in 325(55%) and RD was seen in 269(45%) patients. In 269 patients with RD, 45(17%) did not have HER2 retesting and were excluded. In the remaining 224 patients, 143(64%) were HER2(+) and 81(36%) were HER2(−). With a median follow up of 24 months, 8 patients developed BM at initial recurrence, 4/325(1.2%) with pCR and 4/143(2.8%) with HER2(+) RD. IDFS events occurred in 22/594(3%) patients; 14/269(5%) in RD and 8/325(2%) in pCR (p = 0.04). There was no difference in IDFS between 9/143(6%) patients with HER2(+) RD or 5/81(6%) with HER2(−) RD (p = 0.10). Patients with RD had higher IDFS events than those with pCR. In those with RD, 36% lost HER2(+) status; IDFS events appeared similar in those with HER2(+) RD versus those with HER2(−) RD. The BM events seen in those with RD and pCR highlights the need for more effective therapy in NAST and adjuvant setting to minimize BM risk.

Clinical outcomes after post-operative radiotherapy for breast cancer patients presenting with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastasis: considerations on the cranial border of irradiation field.

Disease recurrence at lower neck adjacent to ipsilateral supraclavicular (SCV) region represents a concern in locally advanced breast cancer patients presenting with SCV metastasis at diagnosis. This study aims to report the outcomes following post-operative radical radiation therapy and discuss the reasonable cranial border of the irradiation field for N3c patients. Between July 2016 and January 2022, a total of 268 patients were eligible for analysis. The endpoints included in-field and out-field cervical failures, local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), SCV recurrence-free survival (SRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). During a median follow-up of 37months (range 3-89months), 17 patients (6.3%) developed local-regional recurrence as the first recurrence event, with 13 having concomitant distant-metastasis (DM); 56 patients (20.9%) had DM alone. The 3-year rates of LRRFS, SRF, DMFS, RFS, and OS were 92.3%, 94.5%, 74.5%, 73.0%, and 90.0%, respectively. 89.2% of patients received RT with the cranial border at the top of hyoid bone, and 95.1% of patients received a boost not exceeding the level of cricoid cartilage. A total of 11 patients (4.1%) developed ipsilateral SCV failure, and 3 patients (1.1%) experienced cervical failure, including 2 in-field failures and 1 out-field failure. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) was administered to 234 patients (87.3%). In the multivariate analysis, non-ypN0, triple-negative subtype and cT4 at diagnosis were predictors of worse SRFS and RFS in NST subgroup. Our findings suggest that radical RT with cranial border of irradiation field at the hyoid bone level lead to excellent local-regional control, and out-field cervical failure was rare. The irradiation field might not extend to mastoid process.

Residual microcalcifications after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer: Implications for surgical planning and long-term outcomes

Residual microcalcifications on mammograms after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) pose a challenge in surgical decision-making. This single-centre retrospective review of all patients who had NACT for breast cancer over five years, evaluated the relationship between pathological complete response and residual microcalcifications, controlling for tumour size, nodal stage, grade, and receptor status, as well as the impact of residual microcalcifications on recurrence and survival. There was no significant association between pathological complete response (pCR) and residual microcalcifications (p = 0.763). We computed hazard ratios (HR) for Time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) which were both not significant, with HR = 2.599, [0.290, 23.264], p = 0.393 and HR = 1.362 [0.123, 15.062], p = 0.801 respectively. The predictive and prognostic significance of residual microcalcifications remains to be proven. The surgical excision of these lesions should be considered based on individual patient risk.

Nodal involvement in patients with small, clinically node-negative HER2-positive breast cancer after staging with FDG-PET/CT and neoadjuvant systemic therapy

BackgroundGuidelines recommend systemic therapy for stage I HER2+ breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) allows response-guided adjuvant treatment. However, prior to NAST only clinical nodal staging is available, risking undertreatment if ypN+ is observed. Here, we aim to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET/CT and NAST on nodal disease status in patients with small, node-negative HER2+ BC. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with small (≤3 cm), clinically node-negative HER2+ BC diagnosed between 2011 and 2023. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with nodal disease on final pathology after upfront surgery or NAST followed by surgery with or without FDG-PET/CT. Patients received either paclitaxel + trastuzumab (PT) or a more extensive regimen. ResultsOf the 370 included patients, 183 underwent FDG-PET/CT, detecting regional or distant metastases in 14 patients (7.7 %).Among 356 patients with cN0 disease, 44.1 % (n = 157/356) had upfront surgery, with only 3 % (5/157) having an FDG-PET/CT. The remaining 55.9 % (199/356) started with NAST, with 82 % (n = 164/199) having an FDG-PET/CT. Among patients treated with NAST, 36 % received PT.Nodal involvement on pathology was seen in 19.1 % (n = 29/152) after upfront surgery without FDG-PET/CT and 6.1 % (10/164) after NAST combined with FDG-PET/CT.After NAST, 58 % had a pCR (PT: 49 %, other: 63 %). Nodal involvement on final pathology was seen in 6.9 % after PT and in 5.5 % after more extensive regimen. ConclusionsThe proportion of patients with ypN + after NAST combined with FDG-PET/CT was only 6.1 %. Neoadjuvant treatment can be a safe treatment strategy for patients with stage I HER2+ BC.

Pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib in participants with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplant as neoadjuvant therapY-PLENTY pilot study.

The high recurrent rate after liver transplantation (LT) remains a clinical challenge, especially for those exceeding the Milan criteria (MC) and with high RETREAT scores. Therefore, the authors aim to investigate whether neoadjuvant systemic therapy allows safely administered and effectively reduces post-LT recurrence for those patients. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, pilot study, patients with HCC exceeding the MC were randomly assigned to PLENTY or control group before LT. The primary endpoint of the study was the recurrence-free survival after LT. Twenty-two patients were enrolled and randomly assigned: 11 to the PLENYT group and 11 to the control group. The 30-month tumor-specific RFS was 37.5% in the PLENTY group and 12.5% in the control group. The 12-month tumor-specific RFS after LT was significantly improved in the PLENTY group (87.5%) compared to the control group (37.5%) (P=0·0022). The objective response rate in the PLENTY group was 30 and 60% when determined by RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, respectively. Six patients (60%) had significant tumor necrosis, including three (30%) who had complete tumor necrosis at histopathology. No acute allograft rejection after LT occurred in the PLENTY and Control group. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib before LT appears to be safe and feasible, associated with significantly better RFS for patients exceeding the MC. Despite the limitations of small sample size, this is the first RCT to evaluate neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in LT recipients, the results of this study will inform future research.

Real World Evidence Study to Assess Incidence, Treatment Patterns, Clinical Outcomes, and Health Care Resource Utilization in Early-Stage, High-Risk HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in Alberta, Canada

BackgroundData are needed to improve the current understanding of the epidemiology of patients with high-risk, HER2-negative, early breast cancer (eBC) (hormone receptor positive [HR+]/HER2-negative BC and triple-negative BC [TNBC]). Patients and MethodsThis retrospective longitudinal cohort study used real-world, population-level data that included all individuals newly diagnosed with high-risk, HER2-negative eBC in Alberta, Canada, between 2010 and 2019. Data on treatment, laboratory results and pathology findings were collected through electronic health records and administrative databases. ResultsThe annual cumulative incidence of high-risk, HER2-negative eBC ranged from 6% to 9% of all incident BC cases. Individuals with TNBC were more likely to be younger, had stage II disease, grade 3 histology and received systemic therapy at a community centre (P < .05) compared to individuals with HR+/HER2-negative eBC. Only 14% of individuals diagnosed in 2010-2017 underwent germline BRCA testing postdiagnosis. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy was given to 37% of individuals. Adjuvant systemic therapy use increased from 77% (2012-2015) to 84% (2019). The 5-year overall survival (OS) from initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy or date of surgery (for individuals who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy) was 77% (95% CI: 75-79). OS was significantly worse among individuals who were older, had grade 3 histology, had stage III disease, or had nodal involvement (P < .05). OS among individuals with TNBC between 2016 and 2019 who initiated adjuvant capecitabine was markedly worse compared to the overall cohort (2-year OS: 70% vs. 89%). ConclusionOutcomes analyses in this high-risk, HER2-negative eBC population suggest a continued unmet clinical need.

Potential advantage of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting thoracic wall infiltration in pleural mesothelioma: A retrospective single-center analysis

ObjectivesThoracic wall infiltration in pleural mesothelioma determines the extent of resection and can be an important prognostic factor. Currently, standardized imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy comprises contrast-enhanced computed tomography or positron emission tomography. Additional thoracic magnetic resonance imaging could better discriminate chest wall infiltration preoperatively and increase staging accuracy. For this reason, the added benefit of magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated at our center. MethodsA retrospective analysis of the extended imaging protocol was performed from July 2018 to March 2024, including a descriptive analysis for the patient's sex, age, tobacco consumption, asbestos exposure, histological subtype, TNM stage, Modified Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors in solid tumors, and number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles. Preoperative restaging included routine imaging and magnetic resonance imaging. After histological diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma, neoadjuvant therapy was conducted, followed by intended macroscopic complete resection, with intraoperative biopsies of suspicious chest wall lesions. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging results were compared with intraoperative biopsies. ResultsTwenty-six patients (mean age, 65.50 years, 11.50% female) with operable pleural mesothelioma were included. Of the 11 patients with histologically proven chest wall infiltration, 10 (90.91%) had a cT-stage 3 or greater and 4 (36.36%) underwent surgery that resulted in an R2 resection. Thoracic magnetic resonance imaging showed a high sensitivity (90.91%) for the detection of chest wall infiltration, especially when compared with the computed tomography scan (9.09%). ConclusionsWith the adjunctive use of magnetic resonance imaging, we demonstrated a higher sensitivity for detection of chest wall infiltration compared with conventional imaging before surgery. This may improve patient selection for surgery. Nevertheless, larger studies are required to confirm these results.

Developing machine learning models for personalized treatment strategies in early breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy based on SEER database

This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (BCS + RT) and mastectomy in early breast cancer (EBC) patients who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), and sought to construct and authenticate a machine learning algorithm that could assist healthcare professionals in formulating personalized treatment strategies for this patient population. We analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on EBC patients undergoing BCS + RT or mastectomy post-NST (2010–2018). Employing propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize potential biases, we compared breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) between the two surgical groups. Additionally, we trained and validated six machine learning survival models and developed a cloud-based recommendation system for surgical treatment based on the optimal model. Among the 13,958 patients, 9028 (64.7%) underwent BCS + RT and 4930 (35.3%) underwent mastectomy. After PSM, there were 3715 patients in each group. Compared to mastectomy, BCS + RT significantly improved BCSS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). Prognostic variables associated with BCSS were utilized to develop machine learning models. In both the training and validation cohorts, the random survival forest (RSF) model demonstrated superior predictive performance (0.847 and 0.795), not only outperforming other machine learning models, including Rpart (0.725 and 0.707), Xgboost (0.762 and 0.727), Glmboost (0.748 and 0.788), Survctree (0.764 and 0.766), and Survsvm (0.777 and 0.790), but also outperforming the classical COX model (0.749 and 0.782). Lastly, a web-based prediction tool was built to facilitate clinical application [https://jhren.shinyapps.io/shinyapp1]. After adjusting other confounders, BCS + RT was associated with improved outcomes in patients with EBC after NST, compared to those who underwent mastectomy. Moreover, the RSF model, a reliable tool, can predict long-term outcomes for patients, providing valuable guidance for operative methods and postoperative follow-up.

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Cathepsin B, L, and S Expression in Breast Cancer Patients.

Cysteine cathepsins are proteases that play a role in normal cellular physiology and neoplastic transformation. Elevated expression and enzymatic activity of cathepsins in breast cancer (BCa) indicates their potential as a target for tumor imaging. In particular cathepsin B (CTSB), L (CTSL), and S (CTSS) are used as targets for near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging (FI), a technique that allows real-time intraoperative tumor visualization and resection margin assessment. Therefore, this immunohistochemical study explores CTSB, CTSL, and CTSS expression levels in a large breast cancer patient cohort, to investigate in which BCa patients the use of cathepsin-targeted NIR FI may have added value. Protein expression was analyzed in tumor tissue microarrays (TMA) of BCa patients using immunohistochemistry and quantified as a total immunostaining score (TIS), ranging from 0-12. In total, the tissues of 557 BCa patients were included in the TMA. CTSB, CTSL, and CTSS were successfully scored in respectively 340, 373 and 252 tumors. All tumors showed CTSB, CTSL, and/or CTSS expression to some extent (TIS > 0). CTSB, CTSL, and CTSS expression was scored as high (TIS > 6) in respectively 28%, 80%, and 18% of tumors. In 89% of the tumors scored for all three cathepsins, the expression level of one or more of these proteases was scored as high (TIS > 6). Tumors showed significantly higher cathepsin expression levels with advancing Bloom-Richardson grade (p < 0.05). Cathepsin expression was highest in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-positive and triple-negative (TN) tumors. There was no significant difference in cathepsin expression between tumors that were treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and tumors that were not. The expression of at least one of the cysteine cathepsins B, L and S in all breast tumor tissues tested suggests that cathepsin-activatable imaging agents with broad reactivity for these three proteases will likely be effective in the vast majority of breast cancer patients, regardless of molecular subtype and treatment status. Patients with high grade ER-negative, HER2-positive, or TN tumors might show higher imaging signals.

Shifting the Paradigm: The Transformative Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer.

The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has become increasingly important in the treatment of breast cancer because of its various advantages. These include the ability to downstage tumors without compromising locoregional control and the potential to obtain valuable information about clinical and biological response to therapy with implications for individual prognoses. Surgical response assessment paves the way for response-adapted therapy, and pathological complete response (pCR; defined as ypT0/is ypN0) serves as an additional endpoint for drug development trials. Recommended NST regimens commonly consist of anthracyclines and taxane, with dose-dense anthracyclines and weekly paclitaxel often preferred, whenever feasible. For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive tumors, dual anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) is indicated together with NST in case of elevated risk of recurrence. For patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), adding carboplatin to NST correlates with improved pCR and survival rates, as does the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors. For hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative cancers, emerging data on NST including immune checkpoint inhibitors may elevate the significance of NST in high-risk luminal breast cancer. Here, we present a synthesis of the results from neoadjuvant clinical trials that aim at optimizing treatment options for patients with high-risk breast cancer.

Systemic chemotherapy in addition to CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A critical systematic review on the impact on overall survival.

In patients with resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases, it is unclear whether systemic chemotherapy, in addition to cytoreductive surgery-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(CRS-HIPEC), improves overall survival (OS). This systematic review of 12 retrospective studies involving 3721 patients aimed to summarize the available evidence. Contradictory results were found regarding the effectiveness of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and perioperative systemic therapies on OS, with a high risk of bias. Available evidence remains inconclusive, stressing the need for prospective, randomized trials, like the ongoing Dutch CAIRO6-trial.

SP6.2 - Oncological outcomes following sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with node positive breast cancer at diagnosis who achieve an axillary pathological complete response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Abstract De-escalation of axillary surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for patients with node positive breast cancer at diagnosis have focused on ensuring a low false negative rate for those who undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) only with limited data to date on oncological outcomes. This study aimed to assess the medium-term oncological outcome in patients who have an axillary pCR following NACT and undergo de-escalation of axillary surgery with only a SLN performed post NACT. A consecutive series of patients with cytologically proven node-positive breast cancer who received NACT and achieved a nodal pCR on SLN between 2013-2021 were retrospectively analysed. Eligible patients underwent an end of treatment axillary ultrasound and if axillary nodes appeared sonographically normal a sentinel node biopsy was performed, with dual modality mapping (radioisotope and blue dye) at the time of breast surgery. The primary outcome of interest was disease free recurrence (DFS), and the secondary outcome was isolated axillary recurrence. 79 patients (median age 48 years) received NACT and had cytologically proven node-positive disease at diagnosis and attained an axillary pathological complete response (pCR) post NACT. The median nodal yield at SLN was 4 (range 1-9). Median follow up was 4.4 years. Only 1 patient experienced an axillary recurrence. Triple negative subtype had the lowest overall DFS. In this cohort, axillary recurrence remains uncommon. The optimal surgical strategy for safe de-escalation of axillary surgery post NACT remains in focus with adjuncts such as nodal marking and targeted axillary currently under study.

Can neoadjuvant systemic therapy provide additional benefits for T1 HER2+ breast cancer patients: a subgroup analysis based on different high-risk signatures.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) is vital in the management of HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Nevertheless, the indications for NAST in tumors <2cm remain controversial. A total of 7961 patients were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database. Independent prognostic factors were identified using multivariate Cox analysis. Subgroup analyses and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to simulate whether NAST would provide a survival benefit with different high-risk characteristics. Nomograms were constructed, and an internal validation cohort was employed. Of the 7961 included patients, 1137 (14.3%) underwent NAST. In the total population, NAST was associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (OS: P=0.00093; BCSS: P < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that NAST markedly affected the prognosis of enrolled patients. Besides, a direct association between T, N, age, subtype, and prognosis was observed. Subgroup analyses yielded in these three subgroups, T1c, hormone receptor-negative, and 61-69years of age, NAST and AST had comparable OS, while NAST possessed worse BCSS. Notably, even in the N3, we still did not observe any additional benefit of NAST. The calculated C-index of 0.72 and 0.73 confirmed the predictability of the nomograms. The AUCs exhibit consistency in the training and validation cohorts. Our findings suggest that NAST does not provide additional benefit to patients with T1 HER2+ breast cancer, even in the presence of lymph node metastasis, T1c, or hormone receptor negativity. This study facilitates the implementation of individualized management strategies.

Can negative axillary ultrasound reliably predict pathologically negative axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients with cT ≤3 cm, cN0, and HER2-positive?-a retrospective, single-institution study.

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cancer in women globally, with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive subtype accounting for 15-20% of cases and exhibiting aggressive behavior. The standard of care for operable BC has evolved to include neoadjuvant systemic therapy, which can guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes, particularly in HER2+ BC. This study aims to investigate whether axillary ultrasound has a good negative predictive value (NPV) for early HER2 BC patients and to identify clinicopathological factors that can impact the axillary lymph node metastasis. This retrospective, single-center study evaluated the medical records of 135 patients with HER2+ BC, cT ≤3 cm, and clinically negative axillary lymph nodes from 2018 to 2020. The study aimed to determine the NPV of axillary ultrasound for pathologically negative axillary lymph node status and to identify factors associated with axillary lymph node metastasis. The NPV of axillary ultrasound was 78.5%, increasing to 89.6% and 93.3% when considering 0-1 and 0-2 metastatic lymph nodes, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was significantly associated with axillary lymph node metastasis, with a 2.2-fold increased risk. Axillary ultrasound shows good predictive value for axillary lymph node negativity in HER2+ BC patients with small tumors. However, the presence of LVI increases the risk of metastasis, suggesting a need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings contribute to personalized treatment strategies for early HER2+ BC, emphasizing the role of axillary ultrasound in clinical decision-making.

Assessment of Intermediate-Term Mortality Following Pancreatectomy for Cancer.

Pancreatic cancer remains highly lethal and resection represents the only chance for cure. Although patients are counseled regarding short-term (0-3 months) mortality, little is known about mortality 3-6 months (intermediate-term) following surgery. We assessed predictors of intermediate-term mortality, evaluated hospital-level variation, and developed a nomogram to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. Patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of intermediate-term mortality and assessed differences between short-term and intermediate-term mortality. Multinomial regression grouped by intermediate-term mortality quartiles evaluated hospital-level variation. A neural network model was constructed to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Of 45,297 patients, 3,974 (8.9%) died within 6-months of surgery of which 2,216 (5.1%) were intermediate-term. Intermediate-term mortality was associated with increasing T-category, positive nodes, lack of systemic therapy, and positive margins (all p < .05) compared with survival beyond 6-months. Compared with short-term, intermediate-term mortality was associated with treatment at high-volume hospitals, positive nodes, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and positive margins (all p < .05). Median intermediate-term mortality rate per hospital was 4.5% (IQR 2.6-6.5). Highest quartile hospitals had decreased odds of treatment with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy (all p < .05). The neural network nomogram was highly accurate (Accuracy: 0.9499; AUC-ROC of 0.7531) in predicting individualized intermediate-term mortality risk. Nearly 10% of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer died within 6-months of which half occurred in the intermediate-term. These data have real-world implications to improve shared decision-making when discussing curative-intent pancreatectomy.

Evidence for Radiation Therapy in Stage III Locoregionally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma in the Post-Immunotherapy Era: A Literature Review.

In the landscape of Stage III locoregionally advanced cutaneous melanoma treatment, the post-immunotherapy era has sparked a number of questions on the management of the nodal basin. However, much of the available literature is not focused on radiation therapy as an adjuvant therapy. This literature review aims to illuminate the evidence surrounding radiation therapy's potential to mitigate regional recurrences in the adjuvant setting for melanoma. Additionally, it seeks to identify adjunct systemic therapy options and explore the synergy between systemic therapy and radiation. Despite strides in surgical techniques and systemic therapies, controlling regional Stage III melanoma remains a formidable clinical hurdle. While historical data strongly suggest the efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy in reducing regional recurrence risk, its evaluation predates the advent of MAPK pathway inhibitors and robust immunotherapy options. Notably, clinical trials have yet to definitively demonstrate a survival advantage with adjuvant radiation therapy. Additional research should focus on refining the definition of high risk for regional recurrence through gene expression profiling or tumor immune profiling scores and elucidate the optimal role of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and molecular subtype: prediction of axillary treatment response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer.

Axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT combined with pathological axillary treatment response has been proposed to guide de-escalation of axillary treatment for clinically node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy. The aim of this study was to assess whether axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and breast cancer molecular subtype are predictors of axillary pCR. This study included clinically node-positive patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the prospective Radioactive Iodine Seed placement in the Axilla with Sentinel lymph node biopsy ('RISAS') trial (NCT02800317) with baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging available. The predictive value of axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and breast cancer molecular subtype to estimate axillary pCR was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Discriminative ability is expressed using ORs with 95% confidence intervals. Overall, 185 patients were included, with an axillary pCR rate of 29.7%. The axillary pCR rate for patients with limited versus advanced baseline axillary disease according to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT was 31.9% versus 26.1% respectively. Axillary disease extent was not a significant predictor of axillary pCR (OR 0.75 (95% c.i. 0.38 to 1.46) (P = 0.404)). There were significant differences in axillary pCR rates between breast cancer molecular subtypes. The lowest probability (7%) was found for hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- tumours. Using this category as a reference group, significantly increased ORs of 14.82 for hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, 40 for hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, and 6.91 for triple-negative tumours were found (P < 0.001). Molecular subtype is a significant predictor of axillary pCR after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, whereas axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT is not.