Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis (the MSUG94 group).

The optimal neoadjuvant regimen before radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) remains to be determined. This retrospective multicenter cohort study assessed the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in patients with HR-PCa undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). We reviewed the datasets of 1023 subjects who underwent RALP at nine Japanese facilities between September 2012 and October 2023. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups using propensity score matching: a RALP-alone group and those who underwent NCHT followed by RALP (NCHT group). The NCHT regimen consisted of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist and tegafur-uracil for at least 3months before RALP. The primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RALP. The secondary endpoint was the surgical specimen pathology findings. Propensity score matching identified 139 individuals for each group. Median follow-up was 18.2months. During follow-up, BCR was observed in 41 patients (29.5%) in the RALP-alone group and 22 patients (15.8%) in the NCHT group (p = 0.010). Pathological results showed significantly more organ-confined PCa and significantly fewer positive surgical margins or lymphovascular invasion in the NCHT group than in the RALP-alone group. The 2-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) was 72.7% and 74.7% in the RALP-alone and NCHT groups, respectively (p = 0.086). Two patients (1.4%) experienced grade 3 liver disorder as an NCHT-related adverse event. The results suggest that NCHT can safely treat HR-PCa and may reduce the incidence of BCR when combined with RALP.

Dose compliance of estramustine phosphate in neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy combined with degarelix acetate predicts the biochemical recurrence in patients with very high-risk prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant degarelix acetate and low-dose estramustine phosphate for high-/very high-risk prostate cancer. Overall, 187 patients diagnosed with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-/very high-risk cTanyN0M0 localized prostate cancer who consented to undergo robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for 6 months were prospectively enrolled between December 2017 and March 2023. Adverse events, perioperative and histopathological outcomes, and biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were examined. Survival analysis compared the estramustine phosphate completion and reduction groups. Thirty-six patients discontinued neoadjuvant therapy in <5 months owing to adverse events (n = 34) or other reasons (n = 2). Eleven were excluded for being in the postoperative castration range. Of the 140 patients who underwent surgery, 124 continued with two tablets of estramustine phosphate and 16 with one tablet. Overall, 82 patients were very high-risk. Histopathological outcomes were significantly worse in the very high-risk group than those in the high-risk group. Very high-risk status and estramustine phosphate reduction were significant factors in biochemical recurrence in multivariate analysis. The biochemical recurrence-free survival rate in very high-risk patients was significantly lower in the estramustine phosphate dose reduction group than in the completion group but not significant in high-risk patients. Major adverse events were anemia (n = 174), elevated transaminase levels (n = 68), and deep vein thrombosis (n = 24). Severe adverse events included acute coronary syndrome (n = 4) and pulmonary embolism (n = 3). Dose compliance with estramustine phosphate predicted biochemical recurrence in patients with very high-risk prostate cancer undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics nomogram for the evaluation of therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer.

The aim of this study was to assess the potential application of a radiomics features-based nomogram for predicting therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in patients with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Clinicopathologic information was retrospectively collected from 162 patients with high-risk non-metastatic PCa receiving NCHT and radical prostatectomy at our center. The postoperative pathological findings were used as the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of NCHT. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was conducted to develop radiomics signature. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of a positive pathological response to NCHT, and a nomogram was constructed based on these predictors. Sixty-three patients (38.89%) experienced positive pathological response to NCHT. Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of periprostatic fat (PPF) radiomics signature was 0.835 (95% CI, 0.754-0.898), while the AUC of intratumoral radiomics signature was 0.822 (95% CI, 0.739-0.888). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that PSA level, PPF radiomics signature and intratumoral radiomics signature were independent predictors of positive pathological response. A nomogram based on these three predictors was constructed. The AUC was 0.908 (95% CI, 0.839-0.954). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the nomogram was well calibrated. Decision curve analysis revealed the favorable clinical practicability of the nomogram. The nomogram was successfully validated in the validation cohort. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that nomogram and positive pathological response were significantly related with survival of PCa. The radiomics-clinical nomogram based on mpMRI radiomics features exhibited superior predictive ability for positive pathological response to NCHT in high-risk non-metastatic PCa.

Combination approach using neoadjuvant therapy with radical prostatectomy for improving oncological outcomes of high-risk prostate cancer: a narrative review.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men. High-risk PCa is associated with an increased risk of PCa-related death. The combined use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is essential to improve oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk PCa, and relatively long-term ADT administration is preferred when radiotherapy is performed. Meanwhile, whether neoadjuvant therapy for radical prostatectomy (RP) improves oncological outcomes remains controversial. This study aimed to review the oncological outcomes of RP in high-risk PCa and emphasize the significance of neoadjuvant therapy including neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) and neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) followed by RP for managing high-risk PCa. We searched for articles published in the PubMed and Scopus databases from January 1, 2005 to March 30, 2023 using the medical subject headings (MeSH) terms: prostate cancer, prostatectomy, radiation therapy, neoadjuvant therapy, and treatment outcome. The study on NHT before RP for high-risk PCa found that NHT was associated with reduced adverse pathological features, such as pT3, positive surgical margins (PSM), and lymph node involvement. However, despite shorter operative times and improved surgical outcomes, NHT did not significantly enhance biochemical recurrence (BCR) or other oncological outcomes. The combination therapy using ADT and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) showed varying results. Another investigation explored NCHT with taxane-based agents, indicating acceptable treatment benefits and improved BCR-free survival rates in high-risk PCa patients, demonstrating potential feasibility for this approach. Ongoing trials, like the PROTEUS trial, aim to further evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk PCa. NHT for high-risk PCa does not contribute to improved oncological outcome and should not be administered easily for downstaging or PSM reduction. NHT in combination with ARSI has the potential advantage of improving the oncological outcome of high-risk PCa compared to RP alone, but the results are currently unsatisfactory, and the development of individualized treatment strategies using several different therapeutic approaches is needed.

Efficacy and safety of combination neoadjuvant chemo-hormonal therapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Efficacy and safety of combination neoadjuvant chemo-hormonal therapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: a mini-review

Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: a mini-review

Disease and Toxicity Outcomes after Salvage Radiotherapy (SRT) for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer (PC) for Patients Enrolled in a Phase II, Open Label Trial Investigating Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy Followed by Radical Prostatectomy (RP)

Men with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer have improved progression free and overall survival (PFS/OS) when treated with docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Our institution conducted a phase II trial (UW17009) investigating the addition of three cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel and ADT to RP in men with high-risk prostate cancer. Here we report toxicity and freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBCR) for patients treated with SRT following participation in this trial. Between January 17, 2018 and August 10, 2021, 28 patients enrolled on UW17009. Patients who had a recurrence and received SRT were identified. Toxicity was assessed using modified LENT (Late Effects of Normal Tissues)/RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) criteria, and time to recurrence following SRT was determined for each patient. Additionally, the months of ADT received by each patient was recorded. FFBCR was then determined for this cohort using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Of 28 patients enrolled on UW17009, 20 (71%) had BCR after RP. Of these, 19 received SRT, representing 68% of the patients enrolled on the trial. The rates of acute grade 1 and grade 2 GU toxicity with SRT were 37% (7) and 53% (10), respectively. The rates of acute grade 1 and grade 2 GI toxicity with SRT were 32% (6) and 37% (7), respectively. On patient experienced a grade 4 genitourinary toxicity during SRT. There were no acute grade 3 or grade 5 toxicities. The rates of late grade 1 and grade 2 GU toxicity were 16% (3) and 11% (2), respectively. The rates of late grade 1 and grade 2 GI toxicity were 11% (2) and 5% (1), respectively. There was 1 (5%) late grade 3 GU toxicity. There were no late grade 3-5 GI toxicities, or late grade 4-5 GU toxicities. The average duration of ADT after prostatectomy was 15 months (range: 0-37 months). According to the method of Kaplan and Meier, mean FFBCR after SRT was 34.0 months at a median of 37.8 months. Median FFBCR had not yet been reached. At the time of analysis, 13 patients remained free from biochemical recurrence after SRT. Rates of biochemical recurrence and SRT following neoadjuvant docetaxel and ADT and then RP were consistent with historical data, as was the rate of successful SRT. Toxicities were also consistent with historical data, though there was notably one acute grade 4 GU toxicity.

Predictive factors associated with differential pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in high-risk localized prostate cancer

To explore the clinical parameters and molecular biomarkers that can predict differential pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in prostate cancer (CaP).A total of 128 patients with primary high-risk localized CaP who had received NCHT followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) were included. Androgen receptor (AR), AR splice variant-7 (AR-V7) and Ki-67 staining were evaluated in prostate biopsy specimens by immunohistochemistry. The pathologic response to NCHT in whole mount RP specimens was measured based on the reduction degree of tumor volume and cellularity compared to the paired pretreatment needle biopsy, and divided into 5 tier grades (Grades 0-4). Patients with Grades 2 to 4 (the reduction degree more than 30%) were defined as having a favorable response. Logistic regression was performed to explore the predictive factors associated with a favorable pathologic response. The predictive accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the ROC curve (AUC).Ninety-seven patients (75.78%) had a favorable response to NCHT. Logistic regression showed that the preoperative PSA level, low AR expression and high Ki-67 expression in biopsy specimens were associated with a favorable pathologic response (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the AUC of the preoperative PSA level, AR and Ki-67 were 0.625, 0.624 and 0.723, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that the rate of favorable pathologic response to NCHT was 88.5% in patients with ARlowKi-67high, which was higher than patients with ARlowKi-67low, ARhighKi-67low, and ARhighKi-67high (88.5% vs. 73.9%, 72.9%, and 70.9%, all P < 0.05).A lower preoperative PSA level was an independent predictive factor for a favorable pathologic response. Moreover, the expression status of AR and Ki-67 in biopsy specimens were associated with differential pathologic response to NCHT, and AR low/Ki-67 high was also associated with favorable response but warrants further evaluation in this patient subgroup and future trial clinical trial design.

Biochemical recurrence after chemohormonal therapy followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in very-high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become one of the standard radical treatments for prostate cancer (PCa). A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted on patients with PCa who underwent RARP at Gifu University Hospital between September 2017 and September 2022. In this study, patients were classified into three groups based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification: low/intermediate-risk, high-risk, and very-high-risk groups. Patients with high- and very-high-risk PCa who were registered in the study received neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy prior to RARP. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) after RARP in patients with PCa was the primary endpoint of this study. The secondary endpoint was the relationship between biochemical recurrence (BCR) and clinical covariates. We enrolled 230 patients with PCa in our study, with a median follow-up of 17.0months. When the time of follow-up was over, 19 patients (8.3%) had BCR, and the 2years BRFS rate for the enrolled patients was 90.9%. Although there was no significant difference in BRFS between the low- and intermediate-risk group and the high/very-high-risk group, the 2years BRFS rate was 100% in the high-risk group and 68.3% in the very-high-risk group (P = 0.0029). Multivariate analysis showed that positive surgical margins were a significant predictor of BCR in patients with PCa treated with RARP. Multimodal therapies may be necessary to improve the BCR in patients with very-high-risk PCa.

Transcriptomic signature defines two subtypes of locally advanced PCa with distinct neoadjuvant therapy benefits.

Patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPCa) received docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemo-hormonal therapy (NCHT) had better clinical outcomes after surgery compared to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) groups, but not all patients experienced favorable clinical outcomes with NCHT, raising the necessity for potential biomarker assessment. The transcriptomic profiling offers a unique opportunity to interrogate the accurate response to NCHT and NHT treatment and to identify the predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant therapy. The whole transcriptomic profiling was performed on baseline biopsies and surgical tissue specimens from 64 patients with LAPCa at Renji Hospital between 2014 and 2018. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS)-based gene-by-treatment interaction effects were used to identify predictive biomarkers for guiding treatment selection. Comparing the transcriptome profiling of pre- and post-treatment LAPCa specimens, NHT and NCHT shared 1917 up- and 670 down-regulated DEGs at least 2-fold. Pathway enrichment analysis showed up-regulated pathways in response to NHT and NCHT were both enriched in cytokine receptor interaction pathways, and down-regulated pathways in response to NCHT were enriched in cell cycle pathways. By comprehensive transcriptome profiling of 64 baseline specimens, ten predictive markers were identified. We integrated them into the signature to evaluate the relative benefits of neoadjuvant therapy, which categorizes patients into two subgroups with relative bPFS benefits from either NHCT or NHT. In the high-score (≥ -95.798) group (n = 37), NCHT treatment led to significantly longer bPFS (P< 0.0001), with a clear and early separation of the Kaplan-Meier curves. In the low-score (< -95.798) group (n = 27), NHT also led to significantly longer bPFS (P=0.0025). In this study, we proposed the first predictive transcriptomic signature might potentially guide the effective selection of neoadjuvant therapy in LAPCa and might provide precise guidance toward future personalized adjuvant therapy. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Ky2019-087).

MP61-17 PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOHORMONAL THERAPY COMPARED WITH EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP61-17 PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOHORMONAL THERAPY COMPARED WITH EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY Takuya Oishi, Shingo Hatakeyama, Ryuji Tabata, Daiji Fujimori, Mamoru Fukuda, Tesuo Shinozaki, Noritaka Ishii, Hiromichi Iwamura, Teppei Okamoto, Hayato Yamamoto, Takahiro Yoneyama, Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Satoru Sato, and Chikara Ohyama Takuya OishiTakuya Oishi More articles by this author , Shingo HatakeyamaShingo Hatakeyama More articles by this author , Ryuji TabataRyuji Tabata More articles by this author , Daiji FujimoriDaiji Fujimori More articles by this author , Mamoru FukudaMamoru Fukuda More articles by this author , Tesuo ShinozakiTesuo Shinozaki More articles by this author , Noritaka IshiiNoritaka Ishii More articles by this author , Hiromichi IwamuraHiromichi Iwamura More articles by this author , Teppei OkamotoTeppei Okamoto More articles by this author , Hayato YamamotoHayato Yamamoto More articles by this author , Takahiro YoneyamaTakahiro Yoneyama More articles by this author , Yasuhiro HashimotoYasuhiro Hashimoto More articles by this author , Satoru SatoSatoru Sato More articles by this author , and Chikara OhyamaChikara Ohyama More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003319.17AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the impact of the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) plus extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) on prognosis in comparison with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) without ePLND. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 452 patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PC) defined as: any of PSA 20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, or cT2c-3 who were treated with RARP between Jan. 2012 and Feb. 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: RARP with ePLND (ePLND group) and NCHT plus RARP without ePLND (NCHT group). We compared the complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification), biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS), castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC-FS), and overall survival (OS) between the groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of treatment on prognosis. RESULTS: We identified 150 and 302 patients in the ePLND and NCHT groups, respectively. The postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in the ePLND group than that in the NCHT group (p<0.001). BCR-FS, CRPC-FS, and OS were significantly longer in the NCHT group than those in the ePLND group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that NCHT was significantly associated with the reduced risk of BCR (hazard ratio 0.24, p<0.001) and CRPC progression (hazard ratio 0.23, p=0.003), but not for OS (HR 0.26, p=0.098). CONCLUSIONS: NCHT plus RARP without ePLND may reduce the risk of postoperative complications, BCR, and CRPC progression in comparison with ePLND during RARP. Source of Funding: none © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e859 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Takuya Oishi More articles by this author Shingo Hatakeyama More articles by this author Ryuji Tabata More articles by this author Daiji Fujimori More articles by this author Mamoru Fukuda More articles by this author Tesuo Shinozaki More articles by this author Noritaka Ishii More articles by this author Hiromichi Iwamura More articles by this author Teppei Okamoto More articles by this author Hayato Yamamoto More articles by this author Takahiro Yoneyama More articles by this author Yasuhiro Hashimoto More articles by this author Satoru Sato More articles by this author Chikara Ohyama More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy vs. extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

We compared the impact of treatment strategies on postoperative complications and prognosis between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) plus extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND) and RARP plus neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) without ePLND. We retrospectively evaluated 452 patients with high-risk prostate cancer (defined as any one of prostate-specific antigen ≥ 20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8–10, or cT2c–3) who were treated with RARP between January 2012 and February 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: RARP with ePLND (ePLND group) and NCHT plus RARP without ePLND (NCHT group). We compared the complication rate (Clavien–Dindo classification), biochemical recurrence-free survival, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival between the groups. We performed multivariable Cox regression analysis using inverse probability weighting (IPTW) methods to assess the impact of the different treatments on prognosis. There were 150 and 302 patients in the ePLND and NCHT groups, respectively. The postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in the ePLND group than in the NCHT group (P < 0.001). IPTW-adjusted biochemical recurrence-free survival and CRPC-free survival were significantly higher in the NCHT group than in the ePLND group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, P < 0.001, and HR 0.29, P = 0.010, respectively). NCHT plus RARP without ePLND may reduce the risk of postoperative complications compared with ePLND during RARP. The impact of treatment strategies on oncological outcomes needs further studies.

Head-to-head comparisons of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, multiparametric MRI, and prostate-specific antigen for the evaluation of therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer patients: a prospective study.

The optimal tool to evaluate the tumour therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in patients with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) remains uncertain. We compared the role of [68Ga]-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT), multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and assessed the practical value of the recent European Association of Urology and European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EAU/EANM) recommended criteria of PSMA PET/CT to evaluate the therapeutic responses to NCHT in patients with high-risk non-metastatic PCa. This prospective study included 72 high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients receiving NCHT followed by radical prostatectomy from June 2021 to March 2022. PSA testing, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and mpMRI scanning were conducted in all patients before and after NCHT. Therapeutic responses to NCHT were evaluated with PSA, RECIST 1.1, PERCIST 1.0, and EAU/EANM recommended criteria. Postoperative pathological results were considered the reference standard. A favourable pathological response was defined as pathologic complete remission (pCR) or minimal residual disease (MRD). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Cohen's kappa index. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictive value of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-derived parameters. All cases experienced a marked decrease in PSA levels after NCHT. Twenty-four (33.33%) cases experienced a favourable pathological response, including five (6.94%) cases of pCR and 19 (26.39%) cases of MRD. According to the results of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, EAU/EANM recommended criteria indicated that 20 (27.78%) cases had a CR, whereas PERCIST 1.0 criteria indicated that 23 (31.94%) cases had a CR. There was a strong association between EAU/EANM recommended criteria and PERCIST 1.0 criteria (Pearson's R=0.857). The sensitivity (75.00%, 79.17% vs. 58.33%, 58.33%), specificity (95.83%, 91.67% vs. 83.33%, 68.75%), PLR (18.00, 9.50 vs. 3.50, 1.87), NLR (0.26, 0.23 vs. 0.50, 0.61), PPV (90.0%, 82.6% vs. 63.6%, 48.3%), and NPV (88.5%, 89.8% vs. 80.0%, 76.7%) of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (including EAU/EANM recommended criteria and PERCIST 1.0 criteria) to predict favourable pathological responses were all superior to those of mpMRI and nadir PSA. The kappa index to predict a favourable pathological response was 0.257 for PSA, 0.426 for RECIST 1.1, 0.716 for PERCIST 1.0, and 0.739 for EAU/EANM recommended criteria. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that the post-NCHT maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) before radical prostatectomy was an independent predictor of a favourable pathological response to NCHT. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had a better concordance with a favourable pathological response to NCHT compared with nadir PSA and mpMRI. EAU/EANM recommended criteria and PERCIST 1.0 criteria performed equally to identify pathological responders when [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was used as a therapeutic response assessment tool.

Clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy combined with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in high-risk Prostate Cancer.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) combined with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). A randomized controlled trial was used in this study. Eighty patients with high-risk PCa treated in Tangshan Gongren Hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The control group was given neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, while the research group was added NCHT to the control group. Three months later, the patients of two groups underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The changes of surgical indicators, adverse drug reactions, incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms, biochemical recurrence rate after follow-up, PSA progression-free survival and incidence of surgical complications were compared between the two groups. After NCHT, the PSA level and prostate volume in the research group decreased significantly than those in the control group (P = 0.00). Surgical duration, postoperative hospital stay and retention time of drainage tube were significantly shorter and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the research group than those in the control group (P = 0.00). The incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms, biochemical recurrence and surgical complications in the research group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the early recovery rate of urinary control and progression-free survival were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). NCHT combined with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a safe and effective treatment for high-risk PCa, which is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.

Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy

We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (< cT4N0M0) who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy plus estramustine phosphate followed by RP between January 2010 and March 2020. Since we stopped limited PLND for such patients in October 2015, we compared the surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) between the limited-PLND group (before October 2015, n = 283) and the non-PLND group (after November 2015, n = 233). The rate of node metastases in the limited-PLND group were 0.8% (2/283). Operation time was significantly longer (176 vs. 162 min) and the rate of surgical complications were much higher (all grades; 19 vs. 6%, grade ≥ 3; 3 vs. 0%) in the limited-PLND group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox analysis revealed limited PLND had no significant impact on BCR-FS (hazard ratio, 1.44; P = 0.469). Limited PLND during RP after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy showed quite low rate of positive nodes, higher rate of complications, and no significant impact on BCR-FS.

MP15-13 OUTCOMES COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION AND NEOADJUVANT CHEMOHORMONAL THERAPY WITHOUT EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN PATIENTS WITH ORGAN CONFINED HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP15-13 OUTCOMES COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION AND NEOADJUVANT CHEMOHORMONAL THERAPY WITHOUT EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN PATIENTS WITH ORGAN CONFINED HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER Shingo Hatakeyama, Ryuji Tabata, Daiji Fujimori, Mamoru Fukuda, Tetsuo Shinozaki, Hiromichi Iwamura, Teppei Okamoto, Takahiro Yoneyama, Satoshi Sato, and Chikara Ohyama Shingo HatakeyamaShingo Hatakeyama More articles by this author , Ryuji TabataRyuji Tabata More articles by this author , Daiji FujimoriDaiji Fujimori More articles by this author , Mamoru FukudaMamoru Fukuda More articles by this author , Tetsuo ShinozakiTetsuo Shinozaki More articles by this author , Hiromichi IwamuraHiromichi Iwamura More articles by this author , Teppei OkamotoTeppei Okamoto More articles by this author , Takahiro YoneyamaTakahiro Yoneyama More articles by this author , Satoshi SatoSatoshi Sato More articles by this author , and Chikara OhyamaChikara Ohyama More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002544.13AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) on oncological outcomes in patients with organ confined high-risk prostate cancer (PC) remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes between the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with ePLND and neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) plus RARP without ePLND in patients with organ-confined high-risk PC. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 419 patients with high-risk PC (any of PSA >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, or cT2c-3) treated with RARP between Jan. 2012 and Feb. 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: RARP plus ePLND (ePLND group) and NCHT plus RARP without ePLND (NCHT group). We compared the complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification), biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS), castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC-FS), and overall survival (OS) between the groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of NCHT on prognosis. RESULTS: We identified 117 and 302 patients in the ePLND and NCHT groups, respectively. The postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in the ePLND group than that in the NCHT group (P<0.001). BCR-FS, CRPC-FS, and OS were significantly longer in the NCHT group than those in the ePLND group. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that NCHT was significantly reduced the risk of BCR (hazard ratio: HR 0.16, P<0.001) and CRPC progression (HR 0.21, P=0.003), but not for OS (HR 0.23, P=0.058). Any grade and major complication rate of the ePLND group was significantly higher (39% and 8.6%, respectively) than those in the NCHT group (11% and 1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: NCHT without ePLND may reduce the risk of postoperative complications, BCR, and CRPC progression in patients with organ-confined high-risk PC treated with RARP. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e246 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Shingo Hatakeyama More articles by this author Ryuji Tabata More articles by this author Daiji Fujimori More articles by this author Mamoru Fukuda More articles by this author Tetsuo Shinozaki More articles by this author Hiromichi Iwamura More articles by this author Teppei Okamoto More articles by this author Takahiro Yoneyama More articles by this author Satoshi Sato More articles by this author Chikara Ohyama More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

A0832 - Outcomes comparison between the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection and neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy without extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with organ confined high-risk prostate cancer

A0832 - Outcomes comparison between the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection and neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy without extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with organ confined high-risk prostate cancer

Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy before Radical Prostatectomy for Japanese Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer.

Background: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, there is a high rate of recurrence, and new approaches are required to improve surgical efficacy. Here, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) before RP for Japanese patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: From February 2009 to April 2016, 21 high-risk patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were treated with docetaxel (70 mg/m2) every four weeks for three cycles and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. Patients with grade 3–4 toxicities had 25% dose reductions for the following course. Results: Median follow-up was 88.6 months. The dose of docetaxel was reduced in 13 patients. The estimated five-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) rate was 57.1%. National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria (high-risk, but not very high-risk (nVHR) versus VHR) was associated with bPFS (p = 0.03). Five-year bPFS rates in the nVHR and VHR groups were 76.9% and 25.0%, respectively. There was a significant difference in bPFS between the nVHR and VHR groups (p = 0.023) by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Conclusions: Although our study included a small number of cases, at least in our exploration, NCHT was safe and feasible. However, more extensive treatment modalities are needed to improve outcomes, especially in VHR patients.

The prognostic nomogram including MRI for locally advanced prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy.

To establish the prognostic nomogram for locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) based on clinical and multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) metrics. One hundred and twenty-one patients diagnosed with LAPC were included in this study. They were all examined by mp-MRI within one week before surgery and treated by RP (36 with RP alone, 48 with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) and 37 with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT)). The biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to determine prognostic factors that were related with bPFS. The prognostic nomogram was established by factors that were significant in multivariate analyses. The median bPFS had significant difference in the subgroup of treatment (RP alone: 2 [0.00-5.04] vs. NHT: 9.3 [6.746-11.854] vs. NCHT: 11.17 [0.000-25.075] months [Log rank p < .001]), the subgroup of hyperintensity within prostate in DWI (negative: 15.97 [11.202-20.731] vs. positive: 5.2 [2.952-7.448] months [Log rank p < .001]) and the subgroup of pelvic lymph node metastasis (negative: 10.2 [8.404-11.996] vs. unilateral: 4.43 [0.000-11.086] vs. Bilateral: 1.83 [0.636~3.031] [Log rank p < .001]). The method of treatment (hazards ratio [HR], 0.566; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.356-0.899; p = .016), hyperintensity within prostate in DWI (HR, 2.539; 95% CI, 1.349-4.779; p = .004) and the metastasis burden of pelvic lymph node (HR, 2.492; 95% CI, 1.645-3.777; p < .001) were identified as independent predictors with significance in multivariable Cox regression analysis. The nomogram was established based on these three factors. We established a nomogram based on three significant prognosis factors including the neoadjuvant therapeutic schedule, hyperintensity within prostate in DWI and the metastasis burden of pelvic lymph nodes, which were associated with the clinical outcomes in LAPC patients after surgery.

Baseline Testosterone Levels in Men with Clinically Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy with or without Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy (Alliance).

Men with low serum testosterone at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis are frequently considered to have more aggressive disease. We examined treatment outcomes in men with clinically localized high-risk cancer to determine if baseline testosterone level identified men at higher risk for cancer progression after treatment. Alliance/CALGB 90203 randomized men with clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer to radical prostatectomy alone or neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy and radical prostatectomy. Men with available baseline testosterone levels who had not received androgen deprivation prior to study enrollment were studied (656). Testosterone level was examined as a continuous variable, as quartiles, and separately in men with an absolute testosterone level above/below 150 ng/dl. Outcomes evaluated were overall survival and event-free survival with events defined by biochemical recurrence, secondary treatment, prostate cancer metastasis, and death. We were unable to demonstrate a difference between baseline serum testosterone level measured as a continuous variable, as quartiles, or as a dichotomous variable (above/below 150 ng/dl) with the outcomes measured. This finding was observed in both arms of the study. Baseline serum testosterone level did not predict outcomes in men with clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy alone or neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy and radical prostatectomy.