Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation Research Articles

Associations between gestational exposure to neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation and early childhood weight status.

This study aimed to examine associations between prenatal neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation (NSD) with early offspring weight status and to assess potential modification by race and ethnicity. We used data from the Newborn Epigenetics STudy (NEST) cohort. Gestational NSD was assessed as neighbourhood deprivation index (NDI) tertiles. Offspring height and weight were assessed at 6 months (N = 1023), 1 year (N = 1268), 2 years (N = 1033) and 3 years (N = 1038). Multilevel logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the relationship of NDI with overweight or obesity and rapid infant weight gain, adjusting for gestational parent age, race/ethnicity, marital status and educational attainment. Models were estimated in the total sample and also stratified by race and ethnicity. Children exposed to NDI in the highest (compared to the lowest) tertile had increased odds of having overweight/obesity at 1 year (OR = 1.53, 95%CI = 1.09-2.15). In stratified models, children of NH Black gestational parents residing in the highest tertile of NDI (compared to the lowest) had increased odds of having overweight/obesity at 1 year (OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.00-2.77). This findings suggest that higher gestational exposure to NSD may play a role in early childhood weight status, which has important implications for later development and health.

Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and patient-reported outcomes in symptom management trials for women with breast cancer.

Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation (NSD) is associated with worse outcomes among patients with cancer, but little is known about NSD-related disparities in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in clinical trials. We examined the relationship between PROs and NSD in symptom management trials among women with breast cancer. We pooled data from three SWOG randomized trials to examine four outcomes: physical and functional wellbeing (PWB, FWB), average pain, and pain interference. NSD was measured using participants' zip code linked to the area deprivation index (ADI) score, categorized into tertiles. Multivariable linear regression adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was used to analyze baseline PROs. Linear mixed models were used to examine if trajectory of PROs from baseline through 24weeks varied by ADI. We examined 761 participants, of whom 51% were from least deprived neighborhoods. Participants in the most deprived neighborhoods had worse average pain at baseline (β = .38, 95% CI = .03 to .72, p = .03) while participants in somewhat deprived areas also had worse FWB (β = -1.07, 95% CI = -1.95 to -.20, p = .02) and pain interference (β = 0.42, 95% CI = .09 to .75, p = .01) compared to those from least deprived areas. Hispanic ethnicity and having Medicaid/no insurance were associated with worse outcomes. After adjusting for baseline score, ADI was not associated with any outcome over time. Breast cancer patients living in areas with NSD had worse FWB, joint pain, and pain interference at baseline. Clinical trial participants should be screened for community-level needs. Implementing interventions to address those needs could help mitigate disparities.

Socioeconomic deprivation and perinatal anxiety: an observational cohort study

BackgroundWomen from areas of social deprivation and minority ethnic groups are more likely to experience poor physical health and have higher rates of mental health problems relative to women from less socially disadvantaged groups. However, very little research has examined this in relation to perinatal anxiety. The current study aims to determine prevalence, risk factors and desire for treatment for perinatal anxiety in three regions of the UK with diverse regional characteristics.MethodsWomen completed measures of anxiety in early, mid-, late-pregnancy and postpartum. Participants were included from three regions of the UK: Region 1 = North East England & North Cumbria n = 512; Region 2 = London North Thames n = 665; Region 3 = West Midlands n = 705.ResultsPrevalence of perinatal anxiety was lower in Region 1 (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89) and Region 2 (OR 0.72 95% CI 0.52 to 0.98) relative to Region 3. Analysis showed the effect of neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation on perinatal anxiety differed by region. In more affluent regions, living in a deprived neighbourhood had a greater impact on perinatal anxiety than living in a deprived neighbourhood in a deprived region. Other factors associated with risk of anxiety in the perinatal period included physical health problems and identifying as being from ‘mixed or multiple’ ethnic groups.ConclusionsNeighbourhood deprivation relative to regional deprivation is a better predictor of perinatal anxiety than either regional deprivation or neighbourhood deprivation alone. Women of mixed ethnic backgrounds and women with physical health problems may warrant more attention in terms of screening and support for perinatal anxiety. Self-reported desire for treatment was found to be low.

Neighborhood socioeconomic disparities in cancer incidence following a hypothetical intervention to increase residential greenspace cover in the UK Biobank cohort

BackgroundHigher greenspace exposure has been associated with lower risk of certain cancers. However, few studies evaluated potential benefits of increasing population-level exposure to greenspace on cancer disparities. We estimated the impact of a hypothetical intervention to increase residential greenspace cover on neighborhood socioeconomic disparities in total, breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer incidence. MethodsOur study included 411,787 cancer-free UK Biobank participants. Percentage of greenspace around baseline residential addresses (300m, 1000m distance buffers) was derived by combining domestic gardens and greenspace cover from the Generalised Land Use Database. We categorized neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation using the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each cancer associated with greenspace, adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. We additionally adjusted for air pollution in supplementary analyses as we a-priori hypothesized that it was on the causal pathway between greenspace and cancer. Further, we used parametric g-computation to calculate the standardized 10-year risk of each cancer, comparing the least to most socioeconomically disadvantaged participants, both without any hypothetical greenspace intervention and under a hypothetical intervention to increase residential greenspace cover to a favorable threshold (75th percentile amongst the least socioeconomically deprived participants). ResultsWe documented 40,519 incident cases of cancer over 4,210,008 person-years follow-up. An interquartile range increase in greenspace cover within 300m was associated with lower incidence of total (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97, 1.00) and lung (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99) cancer, and was suggestively associated with lower prostate and breast cancer incidence, but not colorectal cancer. Additional adjustment for fine particulate matter air pollution (PM2.5) weakened lung cancer associations but strengthened breast and prostate cancer associations (e.g., 300m prostate cancer HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.89, 0.97). The hypothetical intervention to increase greenspace (300m) resulted in 1.3 fewer total cancer cases per 1000 (95% CI 1.0, 1.6) in the most compared to least deprived group, a 23% reduction in the socioeconomic disparity gap. DiscussionHigher residential greenspace cover was associated with lower total, breast, lung, and prostate cancer incidence. Policies to increase residential greenspace cover may reduce the risk of certain cancers, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation is Associated with Worse Outcomes in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Social determinants of health shape a child's transplant course. We describe the association between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, transplant characteristics, and graft survival in US pediatric kidney transplant recipients. US recipients <18 years of age at listing transplanted January 1st, 2010, to May 31st, 2022 (N=9,178) were included from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Recipients were stratified into three groups according to Material Community Deprivation Index score, with greater score representing higher neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation. Outcomes were modeled using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Twenty-four percent (N=110) of recipients from neighborhoods of high socioeconomic deprivation identified as being of Black race, versus 12% (N=383) of recipients from neighborhoods of low socioeconomic deprivation. Neighborhoods of high socioeconomic deprivation had a much greater proportion of recipients identifying as being of Hispanic ethnicity (67%, N=311), versus neighborhoods of low socioeconomic deprivation (17%, N=562). The hazard of graft loss was 55% higher (aHR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.94) for recipients from neighborhoods of high versus recipients from low socioeconomic deprivation neighborhoods when adjusted for base covariates, race and ethnicity, and insurance status, with 59% lower odds (aOR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.56) of living donor transplantation and, although not statistically significant, 8% lower odds (aOR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72, 1.19) of preemptive transplantation. The hazard of graft loss was 41% higher (aHR 1.41, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.60) for recipients from neighborhoods of intermediate versus recipients from low socioeconomic deprivation neighborhoods when adjusted for base covariates, race and ethnicity, and insurance status, with 27% lower odds (aOR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.81) of living donor transplantation and 11% lower odds (aOR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80, 0.99) of preemptive transplantation. Children from neighborhoods of high socioeconomic deprivation have worse graft survival and lower utilization of preemptive and living donor transplantation. These findings demonstrate inequities in pediatric kidney transplantation that warrant further intervention.

Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

To evaluate the association between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, distance from ophthalmology clinics, and diagnosis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Retrospective cohort study. Adult patients (≥18 years) with diabetes mellitus at Johns Hopkins Hospital and University of Wisconsin-Madison. Patient addresses were geocoded and the block group was linked to the 2021 national Area Deprivation Index (ADI). ADI was divided into quartiles, with higher quartiles indicating greater socioeconomic disadvantage. The distance between patient's residence and ophthalmology clinics was calculated. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between ADI quartile, distance from clinic, and PDR, adjusted for demographics and insurance status. The interaction between ADI and distance was tested. Diagnosis of PDR. 73,618 patients were included. A significant interaction was observed between ADI quartile and distance from ophthalmology clinics (P < .001). Among patients residing within 8 miles of clinics, those in higher ADI quartiles had increased odds of PDR compared to those in ADI Q1 (Q2: OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.12-1.65; Q3: OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.46-2.19; Q4: OR 2.60, 95% CI 2.09-3.25; P<.001 for trend). Conversely, for patients living more than 8 miles from clinics, the odds of PDR were similar across ADI quartiles (Q1: OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.98; Q2: OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.12; Q3: OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90-1.30). However, patients in all ADI quartiles more than 8 miles had greater odds of PDR compared to those in the same ADI quartile within 8 miles (OR 3.15, 95% CI 2.61-3.80, OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.71-2.27, OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.51-2.12, and OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.61 in ADI Q1 to Q4 respectively). Patients living in neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic disadvantage and further from ophthalmology clinics have greater odds of PDR. These findings suggest the potential utility of targeted interventions in socioeconomically deprived and distant areas to reduce PDR-related blindness.

The impact of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation on treatment and survival for patients with metastatic gastric cancer: An incidence-based retrospective cohort study.

110 Background: Studies have shown that socioeconomic deprivation (SED) is associated with reduced treatment and overall survival (OS) for gastric cancer. However, these studies have typically used large geographic areas for assessment of SED and aggregated all stages. Using a statewide cancer registry, the Area Deprivation Index, a granular measure of SED, was used to assess receipt of treatment and OS for metastatic gastric cancer patients. Methods: Using the incidence-based Florida Cancer Data System, gastric adenocarcinoma patients diagnosed from 2007-2015were identified (n=8,304). The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a composite measure of SED and validated dataset that ranks neighborhoods (census block groups) from 1-100 (higher scores=higher deprivation). Demographic, tumor, and treatment variables were assessed using descriptive statistics, regression, and survival analysis. Results: Overall, 3,050 stage IV patients met inclusion criteria; 53.9% were male and the median age was 67. When assessed by SED quartile, there were significant differences by race, ethnicity, insurance, and receipt of chemotherapy (p&lt;0.05). For the cohort, 55.3% of patients received chemotherapy. However, 61.3% of the lowest deprivation cohort received chemotherapy compared to 50.4% in the highest deprivation cohort (p&lt;0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, the lowest deprivation quartile had increased odds of chemotherapy compared to the highest deprivation quintile (OR 1.52; 95% CI,1.20-1.92). Of patients who received chemotherapy, the median time in months to initiation was 1.1 (interquartile range 0.6-1.7). Median OS was 5.8 months. The median OS for the lowest and highest SED quartiles was 7.5 and 5.1 months, respectively (p&lt;0.001). For patients who received and did not receive chemotherapy, median OS was 10.0 and 1.9 months, respectively. The median OS of the lowest and highest SED quartiles for those who received chemotherapy was 11.3 and 8.8 months, respectively (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: In an incidence-based, statewide cancer registry examining metastatic gastric cancer, just over half of patients received chemotherapy and median OS was poor. Additionally, higher SED was associated with lower odds of chemotherapy and worse OS. These data suggest that SED impacts metastatic gastric cancer outcomes and future studies are needed to understand the multilevel factors driving disparities. Lowest Deprivation Low Deprivation High Deprivation Highest Deprivation p-value N=752 N=780 N=747 N=718 Chemotherapy 0.003 No 262 (34.8%) 315 (40.4%) 306 (41.0%) 314 (43.7%) Yes 461 (61.3%) 424 (54.4%) 410 (54.9%) 362 (50.4%) Unknown 29 (3.9%) 41 (5.3%) 31 (4.1%) 42 (5.8%)

The impact of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation on clinical outcomes for locally advanced and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: An incidence-based retrospective cohort study.

108 Background: Prior studies show that socioeconomic status impacts hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes. However, these have used larger geographic areas such as zip codes or counties for assessment. Using a statewide cancer registry the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a granular measure of socioeconomic deprivation (SED), was used to assess receipt of treatment and overall survival (OS) for locally advanced and metastatic HCC. Methods: The incidence-based Florida Cancer Data System was used to identify stage III/IV HCC patients diagnosed from 2007-2015. The ADI was used to measure SED and is a validated dataset that ranks neighborhoods (census block groups) from 1-100 (higher scores = higher deprivation) based on income, education, housing, and other socioeconomic factors. Demographic, tumor, and treatment variables were assessed using descriptive statistics, regression plots, and survival analysis. Chemotherapeutic treatment (CT) included receipt of chemotherapy and/or chemoembolization. Results: The study identified 2,534 eligible patients. Males comprised 80.6% of the cohort. The median age was 63 years. By SED quartile, there were significant differences by age, race, insurance, and receipt of chemotherapy (p&lt;0.05) but no difference by gender, ethnicity, stage, or survival. Overall, 39.1% received chemotherapeutic treatment. However, 41.0% of the lowest-deprivation patients received CT compared to 32.1% in the highest-deprivation cohort (p&lt;0.01). After adjustment for potential confounders, the lowest deprivation quartile had increased odds of CT compared to the highest deprivation quartile (OR 1.47; 95% CI,1.15-1.87). The median OS for the cohort was 4.0 months and was 4.6 and 3.3 months, respectively, for the lowest and highest deprivation quartiles (p&lt;0.01). For patients who received and did not receive CT, the median OS was 8.0 and 2.2 months, respectively (p&lt;0.01). However, there was no difference in median OS by SED for those who received CT (p=0.14). Conclusions: In an incidence-based, statewide cancer registry, the median OS for locally advanced and metastatic HCC remains poor and most patients do not receive CT. While there were differences in receipt of CT by SED, when patients did receive CT, median OS was similar across SED quartiles. These data suggest that SED may impact receipt of treatment and efforts are needed to understand and address treatment disparities. Lowest Deprivation Low Deprivation High Deprivation Highest Deprivation p-Value N=624 N=650 N=589 N=629 Chemotherapeutic treatment 0.001 No 347 (55.6%) 345 (53.1%) 339 (57.6%) 411 (65.3%) Yes 256 (41.0%) 283 (43.5%) 235 (39.9%) 202 (32.1%) Unknown 21 (3.4%) 22 (3.4%) 15 (2.5%) 15 (2.6%) Vital Status 0.93 Alive 41 (5.7%) 44 (5.9%) 43 (6.0%) 44 (6.5%) Dead 682 (94.3%) 695 (94.1%) 673 (94.0%) 632 (93.5%)

The association between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and mental health in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

Environmental research on mental health primarily originates from high-income countries, while information about the rest of the world remains limited. This study examined: (1) the available published research evidence regarding the association between neighborhood-level deprivation and indicators of mental health and illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and (2) the gaps in the relevant research in LMIC settings that should be addressed in future studies. First, we systematically searched for relevant primary studies in electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Scopus, Socindex, and PsycINFO) and citations in the reference lists. Then, a two-stage screening procedure was employed to select the relevant studies by screening the titles and abstracts and reviewing the selected full texts by independent researchers. After charting the data from the selected study reports, we collated, summarized, and discussed the results. We retrieved 51 studies across 19 LMICs, with only one study originating from a low-income country. Most studies focused on adult mental health topics and few explored children's mental health. Notably, a significant majority of these studies (N = 37) reported a positive association between neighborhood deprivation and mental health/disorder. However, the research methods used varied significantly, and there were several methodological limitations. This review highlights the need for more original studies in LMICs on the association between neighborhood deprivation and mental health, employing stronger methodologies.

Neighborhood environments and psychological distress 6-years later: results from the San Diego HCHS/SOL community and surrounding areas study.

The current study examined associations of social and built features of neighborhood environments with psychological distress 6 years later and whether these associations were explained by stress and social factors, among Hispanic/Latino adults from the HCHS/SOL and SOL CASAS Ancillary Study. In the SOL CASAS Ancillary Study, HCHS/SOL San Diego participants' baseline (2008-2011) home addresses were geocoded, neighborhoods were defined using 800m radial buffers, and variables representing neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, social disorder, walkability, and greenness were created. Psychological distress (anxiety and depression symptoms) and proposed pathway variables chronic stress, social support, and family cohesion were assessed at HCHS/SOL Visit 2 (2014-2017). On average, the population (n = 2785) was 39.47 years old, 53.3% were women, and 92.3% were of Mexican heritage. In complex survey regression analyses that accounted for sociodemographic covariates, the complex sampling design, and sample weights, greater baseline neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation predicted lower family cohesion at Visit 2 (B = -0.99, 95% CI [-1.97, -0.06]). Path models showed indirect associations of baseline neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation with Visit 2 psychological distress through family cohesion (MacKinnon's 95% CI depression [0.001, 0.026]; 3.9% of the variance accounted for; anxiety [0.00071, 0.019] 3.0% of the variance accounted for). Among adults of mostly Mexican heritage from the San Diego, CA area, neighborhood deprivation indirectly predicted later psychological distress through family cohesion. No other effects of neighborhood variables were observed.

Hospital volume does not mitigate the impact of area socioeconomic deprivation on heart transplantation outcomes.

While structural socioeconomic inequity has been linked with inferior health outcomes, some have postulated reduced access to high-quality care to be the mediator. We assessed whether treatment at high-volume centers(HVC) would mitigate the adverse impact of area deprivation on heart transplantation(HT) outcomes. All HT recipients ≥18years were identified in the 2005-2022 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the previously validated Area Deprivation Index. Recipients with scores in the highest quintile were considered Most Deprived (others: Less Deprived). Hospitals in the highest quartile by cumulative center volume (≥21 transplants/year) were classified as HVC. The primary outcome was post-transplant survival. Of 38,022 HT recipients, 7,579 (20%) were considered Most Deprived. Following risk adjustment, Most Deprived demonstrated inferior survival at 3(hazard ratio[HR] 1.14, 95%confidence interval[CI] 1.06-1.21) and 5 years following transplantation (HR 1.13, CI 1.07-1.20). Similarly, Most Deprived faced greater graft failure at 3(HR 1.14, CI 1.06-1.22) and 5 years (HR 1.13, CI 1.07-1.20). Evaluating patients transplanted at HVC, Most Deprived continued to face greater mortality at 3(HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.21) and 5 years (HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.19). The interaction between Most Deprived status and care at HVC was not significant, such that transplantation at HVC did not ameliorate the survival disparity between Most and Less Deprived. Area socioeconomic disadvantage is independently associated with inferior survival. Transplantation at HVC did not eliminate this inequity. Future efforts are needed to increase engagement with longitudinal follow-up care and address systemic root causes to improve outcomes.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and 30-Day Outcomes for Common Cardiovascular Conditions.

Understanding the relationship between neighborhood environment and cardiovascular outcomes is important to achieve health equity and implement effective quality strategies. We conducted a population-based cohort study to determine the association of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and 30-day mortality and readmission rate for patients admitted with common cardiovascular conditions. We examined claims data from fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years between 2017 and 2019 admitted for heart failure, valvular heart disease, ischemic heart disease, or cardiac arrhythmias. The primary exposure was the Area Deprivation Index; outcomes were 30-day all-cause death and unplanned readmission. More than 2 million admissions were included. After sequential adjustment for patient characteristics (demographics, dual eligibility, comorbidities), area health care resources (primary care clinicians, specialists, and hospital beds per capita), and admitting hospital characteristics (ownership, size, teaching status), there was a dose-dependent association between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and 30-day mortality rate for all conditions. In the fully adjusted model for death, estimated effect sizes of residence in the most disadvantaged versus least disadvantaged neighborhoods ranged from adjusted odds ratio 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22-1.36) for the heart failure group to adjusted odds ratio 1.63 (95% CI, 1.36-1.95) for the valvular heart disease group. Neighborhood deprivation was associated with increased adjusted 30-day readmission rates, with estimated effect sizes from adjusted odds ratio 1.09 (95% CI, 1.05-1.14) for heart failure to adjusted odds ratio 1.19 (95% CI, 1.13-1.26) for arrhythmia. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with 30-day mortality rate and readmission for patients admitted with common cardiovascular conditions independent of individual demographics, socioeconomic status, medical risk, care access, or admitting hospital characteristics.

The TBI Model Systems Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage Index (TBIMS-NSDI): Development and Comparison to Individual Socioeconomic Characteristics.

To create a census-based composite neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation index (NSDI) from geocoded residential addresses and to quantify how NSDI aligns with individual-level socioeconomic factors among people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Community. People enrolled in the TBI Model Systems National Database (TBIMS NDB). Secondary analysis of a longitudinal cohort study. The TBIMS-NSDI was calculated at the census tract level for the United States population based on a principal components analysis of eight census tract-level variables from the American Community Survey. Individual socioeconomic characteristics from the TBIMS NDB were personal household income, education (years), and unemployment status. Neighborhood:Individual NSDI residuals represent the difference between predicted neighborhood disadvantage based on individual socioeconomic characteristics versus observed neighborhood disadvantage based on the TBIMS-NSDI. A single principal component was found to encompass the eight socioeconomic neighborhood-level variables. It was normally distributed across follow-up years 2, 5, and 10 post-injury in the TBIMS NDB. In all years, the TBIMS-NDSI was significantly associated with individual-level measures of household income and education but not unemployment status. Males, persons of Black and Hispanic background, Medicaid recipients, persons with TBI caused by violence, and those living in urban areas, as well as in the Northeast or Southern regions of the United States, were more likely to have greater neighborhood disadvantage than predicted based on their individual socioeconomic characteristics. The TBIMS-NSDI provides a neighborhood-level indicator of socioeconomic disadvantage, an important social determinant of outcomes from TBI. The Neighborhood:Individual NSDI residual adds another dimension to the TBIMS-NSDI by summarizing how a person's socioeconomic status aligns with their neighborhood socioeconomics. Future studies should evaluate how both measures affect TBI recovery and life quality. Research studying neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage may improve our understanding of how systemic adversity influences outcomes after TBI.

Neighborhood-level Social Determinants of Health Burden among AYA Cancer Patients and Impact on Overall Survival.

Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation has been linked to adverse health outcomes, yet it is unclear if neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDOH) measures impact overall survival in adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. This study utilized a diverse cohort of AYA cancer patients (N = 10,261) seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Zip codes were linked to Area Deprivation Index (ADI) values, a validated neighborhood-level SDOH measure, with higher ADI representing worse SDOH. ADI was significantly worse (p < .05) for Black (61.7) and Hispanic (65.3), compared to White (51.2) patients. Analysis of ADI by cancer type showed significant differences, mainly driven by worse ADI in patients with cervical cancer (62.3) than other cancers. In multivariable models including sex, age at diagnosis, cancer diagnosis, and race/ethnicity, risk of shorter survival for people residing in neighborhoods with the least favorable ADI quartile was greater than those in the most favorable ADI quartile (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.00-1.19, p = .043). AYA cancer patients with the worst ADI experienced a nearly 10% increase in risk of dying compared to those with more favorable ADI and this effect was strongest among White AYA survivors. Although the magnitude of the effect of ADI on survival was moderate, the presence of a relationship between neighborhood-level SDOH and survival among patients who received care at a tertiary cancer center suggests ADI is a meaningful predictor of survival. These findings provide intriguing evidence for potential interventions aimed at supporting AYA cancer patients from disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation and Health Care Costs in Older Community-Dwelling Adults: Importance of Functional Impairment and Frailty

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation and Health Care Costs in Older Community-Dwelling Adults: Importance of Functional Impairment and Frailty

The relationship between neighborhood economic deprivation and asthma-associated emergency department visits in Maryland.

Asthma represents a substantial public health challenge in the United States, affecting over 25 million adults. This study investigates the impact of neighborhood economic deprivation on asthma-associated Emergency Department (ED) visits in Maryland, using the Distressed Communities Index (DCI) for analysis. A retrospective analysis of Maryland's Emergency Department Databases from January 2018 to December 2020 was conducted, focusing on asthma-associated ED visits. The study involved 185,317 ED visits, majority of which were females (56.3%) and non-Hispanic whites (65.2%). A significant association was found between increased neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and asthma-related ED visits. The poorest neighborhoods showed the highest rates of such visits. Compared to prosperous areas, neighborhoods classified from Comfortable to Distressed had progressively higher odds for asthma-related ED visits (Comfortable: OR = 1.14, Distressed OR = 1.65). Other significant asthma predictors included obesity, female gender, tobacco smoking, and older age. There is a substantive association between higher asthma-related ED visits and high neighborhood economic deprivation, underscoring the impact of socioeconomic factors on health outcomes. Addressing healthcare disparities and improving access to care in economically distressed neighborhoods is crucial. Targeted interventions, such as community health clinics and asthma education programs, can help mitigate the impact of neighborhood disadvantage.

The impact of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation on overall survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: An incidence-based retrospective cohort study.

The impact of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation on overall survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: An incidence-based retrospective cohort study.

Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Functional Outcomes After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This review aimed to quantify the impact of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes from stroke and identify the socioeconomic status indicators that exhibit the highest magnitude of association. We performed a systematic literature search across Medline and Embase from inception to May 2022, to identify observational studies (n≥100, and in English). Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool data. We included 19 studies (157 715 patients, 47.7% women) reporting functional outcomes measured with modified Rankin Scale or Barthel index, with 10 assessed as low risk of bias. Measures of socioeconomic status reported were education (11 studies), income (8), occupation (4), health insurance status (3), and neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation (3). Pooled data suggested that low socioeconomic status was significantly associated with poor functional outcomes, including incomplete education or below high school level versus high school attainment and above (odds ratio [OR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.40-1.95]), lowest income versus highest income (OR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.02-1.83]), a manual job/being unemployed versus a nonmanual job/working (OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.29-2.02]), and living in the most disadvantaged socioeconomic neighborhood versus the least disadvantaged (OR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.25-1.92]). Low health insurance status was also associated with an increased risk of poor functional outcomes (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.95-1.84]), although this was association was not statistically significant. Despite great strides in stroke treatment in the past decades, social disadvantage remains a risk factor for poor functional outcome after an acute stroke. Further research is needed to better understand causal mechanisms and disparities.

Impact of regional differences and neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation on the outcomes of patients with lower extremity wounds evaluated by a limb-preservation service

ObjectiveManagement of lower extremity (LE) wounds has evolved with the establishment of specialized limb preservation services. Although clinical factors contribute to limb outcomes, socioeconomic status and community factors also influence the risk for limb loss. The Distressed Community Index (DCI) score is a validated index of social deprivation created to provide an objective measure of economic well-being in United States communities. Few studies have examined the influence of geographic deprivation on outcomes in patients with LE wounds. We examined relationships between socioeconomic deprivation and outcomes of inpatients evaluated by a dedicated limb preservation service (Functional Limb Extremity Service [FLEX]). MethodsInpatients referred to FLEX over a 5-year period were included. Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) staging was collected. DCI scores were determined using seven indices based on ZIP Code. Outcomes included any minor or major amputations, any endovascular or open LE revascularization, or wound care procedures. Disease etiology, demographic, and anthropometric data were collected. Associations between neighborhood deprivation and limb-specific outcomes were evaluated in models for the DCI and each of its components separately. ResultsA total of 677 patients were included. Thirty-eight percent were female, with a mean age of 64 years. Sixty percent had WIfI stage 3 or 4 risk of amputation, and 43% had WIfI stage 3 or 4 risk of revascularization. Mean ankle-brachial index and toe pressure were 0.96 (standard deviation [SD], 0.43) and 80 (SD, 57) mmHg. Thirty-five percent were non-White. Amputation was performed in 31% of patients, whereas 17% underwent revascularization. The mean distress score was 64 (SD, 24). Mean DCI scores did not differ across WIfI scores. Likewise, overall DCI distress score was not related to any of the outcomes in univariable or multivariable linear regression models. In univariable linear regression models for amputation, higher poverty rate (odds ratio for SD increase 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.42; P = .025) was significantly associated with the outcome. In multivariable models, neither DCI distress score nor any of its components remained significantly associated with the outcome. ConclusionsDespite known racial disparities in limb-specific outcomes, an aggregate measure of community level distress was not found to be related to outcomes. Although the poverty rate demonstrated a significant relationship with amputation in univariable analysis, this association was not found in multivariable models. Notably, non-White race emerged as a predictor of amputation, underscoring the importance of addressing racial disparities in LE outcomes. Further investigation of potential determinants of LE outcomes is needed, particularly the interaction of such factors with race.

Socioeconomic deprivation and racialised disparities in competitive athletes with sudden cardiac arrest from the USA

ObjectiveTo explore the association of socioeconomic deprivation and racialised outcomes in competitive athletes with sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the USA.MethodsSCA cases from the National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury...