Negative Rapid Antigen Detection Test Research Articles

Use of point-of-care tests in pharyngotonsillitis – a registry-based study in primary health care

Background Point-of-care (POC) tests, including C-reactive protein (CRP) tests and rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for group A streptococci (GAS), are widely used in Swedish primary health care (PHC). This study quantifies their use in pharyngotonsillitis and explore their association with antibiotic prescribing. Material and methods Retrospective data from 2012–2016 in Region Kronoberg, Sweden, included all PHC visits with a pharyngotonsillitis diagnosis. Patient characteristics, test usage and antibiotic prescriptions were linked by visit date and personal identification number. Descriptive statistics were used for POC test analysis. Logistic regression assessed the association between CRP levels and antibiotic prescribing. Results Of 24,237 visits, 68% included RADT and 36% included a CRP test, with 89% of CRP tests performed alongside RADT. CRP testing was more frequent in patients with negative (56%) than positive RADTs (42%) (p < .001). Overall, 66% of RADTs were positive. Median CRP levels were 23 mg/l for positive RADT and 31 mg/l for negative RADT (p < .001). Antibiotics were prescribed for 95% of positive RADTs and 43% of negative RADTs (p < .001). In patients with negative RADTs, CRP testing was associated with higher antibiotic prescribing (57%) compared to no CRP testing (26%) (p < .001). Among these patients, CRP levels were associated with prescribing (aOR 1.032; 95% CI 1.029–1.035; p < .001), with 50% of prescriptions occuring at CRP levels ≤ 20 mg/l. Conclusion The use of RADTs and the proportion of positive test were higher than expected, indicating inappropriate use and diagnostic bias. CRP testing, contrary to guidelines, was common and associated with increased antibiotic prescribing.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Arrival Surveillance Screening by Nucleic Acid Amplification Versus Rapid Antigen Detection on Subsequent COVID-19 Infections in Military Trainees.

For persons entering congregate settings, optimal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) arrival surveillance screening method, nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) versus rapid antigen detection test (RADT), is debated. To aid this, we sought to determine the risk of secondary symptomatic coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) among military trainees with negative arrival NAAT or RADT screening. Individuals who arrived for US Air Force basic military training from 1 January-31 August 2021 were placed into training groups and screened for SARS-CoV-2 via NAAT or RADT. Secondary symptomatic COVID-19 cases within 2 weeks of training were then measured. A case cluster was defined as ≥5 individual symptomatic COVID-19 cases. 406 (1.6%) of 24 601 trainees screened positive upon arrival. The rate of positive screen was greater for those tested with NAAT versus RADT (2.5% vs 0.4%; RR: 5.4; 95% CI: 4.0-7.3; P < .001). The proportion of training groups with ≥1 positive individual screen was greater in groups screened via NAAT (57.5% vs 10.8%; RR: 5.31; 95% CI: 3.65-7.72; P < .001). However, NAAT versus RADT screening was not associated with a difference in number of training groups to develop a secondary symptomatic case (20.3% vs 22.5%; RR: .9; 95% CI: .66-1.23; P = .53) or case cluster of COVID-19 (4% vs 6.6%; RR: .61; 95% CI: .3-1.22; P = .16). NAAT versus RADT arrival surveillance screening method impacted individual transmission of COVID-19 but had no effect on number of training groups developing a secondary symptomatic case or case cluster. This study provides consideration for RADT arrival screening in congregate settings.

The impact of rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for group A streptococcus on the antibiotic prescription: an observational study from a primary care setting in Lisbon

Introduction: Acute pharyngitis is a common diagnosis in primary care. Although viruses are the most common aetiology, antibiotic therapy is frequently prescribed. The inappropriate antibiotic prescription should be avoided to prevent antibiotic resistance. Many national and international guidelines recommend testing for group A streptococcus (GAS) before antibiotic treatment when clinical presentation suggests GAS infection. Aim: This study aims to describe the feasibility of the implementation of the rapid antigen detection test (RADT) in a primary care setting and its impact on antibiotic prescription. Secondary goals include the evaluation of possible associations between symptoms and RADT results. Methods: From October 2019 to March 2020, patients presenting with acute pharyngitis at USF do Parque were eligible. A questionnaire was applied to divide the individuals into four different groups (clearly viral, probably viral, diagnostic doubt, and probably bacterial), and to assess the previous intention to prescribe antibiotics. We applied 136 questionnaires and performed 133 RADT. Nursing staff classified the specimen collection process and result from interpretation according to its difficulty. The proportion of antibiotics avoided was estimated as the number of times physicians changed their intended antibiotic prescription following a negative RADT result. Results: Among the tests performed, 97.7% were easy to interpret. Without RADT, 45 patients were going to be prescribed an antibiotic. After the test result, 27 antibiotic prescriptions were avoided. Tonsil hypertrophy, palatal petechiae, and fever increased the odds of a positive RADT result. Cough was associated with a negative RADT result. Conclusions: This study showed that RADT is easy to implement and contributed to appropriate antibiotic prescription. Tonsil hypertrophy, palatal petechiae, and fever were significantly associated with a positive RADT result, and cough was associated with a negative RADT result. Primary care centers would benefit from having RADT available when there is strong suspicion or doubt of bacterial pharyngitis.

Agreement between rapid antigen detection test and culture for group A streptococcus in patients recently treated for pharyngotonsillitis - a prospective observational study in primary care

Objective The aim was to compare rapid antigen detection test (RADT) and throat culture for group A streptococci (GAS) among patients recently treated with penicillin V for GAS pharyngotonsillitis. Design and setting The study was a secondary analysis within a randomized controlled trial comparing 5 versus 10 days of penicillin V for GAS pharyngotonsillitis. Patients were recruited at 17 primary health care centres in Sweden. Subjects We included 316 patients ≥ 6 years of age, having 3–4 Centor criteria, a positive RADT and a positive throat culture for GAS at inclusion, and also having a RADT and throat culture for GAS taken at a follow-up visit within 21 days. Main outcome measures RADT and conventional throat culture for GAS. Results This prospective study showed 91% agreement between RADT and culture at follow-up within 21 days. Only 3/316 participants had negative RADT with a positive throat culture for GAS at follow-up, and 27/316 patients with positive RADT had a negative culture for GAS. Log rank test did not reveal any difference in the decline over time of positive tests between RADT and throat culture (p = 0.24). Agreement between RADT and throat culture for GAS at the follow-up was not associated with treatment duration, number of days from inclusion until follow-up, throat symptoms at follow-up, gender, or age. Conclusion RADT and culture for GAS agreed to a high extent also after recent penicillin V treatment. RADT for GAS means a low risk for missing the presence of GAS. KEY POINTS Testing for group A streptococci (GAS) before antibiotic treatment can reduce antibiotic prescription for pharyngotonsillitis. It has been proposed that rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for group A streptococci after recent penicillin V treatment may be falsely positive due to possible persisting antigens from non-viable bacteria. The decline of the presence of GAS was similar between RADT and conventional throat culture in patients who had recently completed penicillin V treatment for GAS pharyngotonsillitis RADT for GAS is useful in identifying the presence of GAS after recent penicillin V treatment

Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigenic tests for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in hospital outbreak situation

The reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) continues to be the reference diagnostic method for the confirmation of COVID-19 cases; however, rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) have recently been developed. The purpose of the study is to assess the performance of rapid antigen-based COVID-19 testing in the context of hospital outbreaks. This was an observational, cross-sectional study. The study period was from October 2020 to January 2021. The “Panbio COVID-19 AG” RADT (Abbott) was performed and TaqPath COVID-19 test RT-PCR. The samples were obtained from hospitalised patients in suspected outbreak situations at the Ramón y Cajal Hospital. A hospital outbreak was defined as the presence of 3 or more epidemiologically linked cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the RADT were calculated using RT-PCR as a reference. A total of 17 hospital outbreaks were detected in 11 hospital units during the study period, in which 34 RT-PCR and RADT screenings were performed. We obtained 541 samples, which were analysed with RT-PCR and a further 541 analysed with RADT. Six RADT tests gave conflicting results with the RT-PCR, 5 of them with a negative RADT and positive RT-PCR and one with positive RADT and a negative RT-PCR. The sensitivity of the RADT was 83.3% (65.3–94.4%) and the specificity was 99.8% (98.9–100%). The PPV was 96.2% (80.4–99.9%) and the NPV was 99% (97.7–99.7%). The RADT shows good diagnostic performance in patients on non-COVID-19 hospital wards, in the context of an outbreak.

Association between bacterial finding, antibiotic treatment and clinical course in patients with pharyngotonsillitis: a registry-based study in primary healthcare in Sweden

BackgroundThe role of non-group A streptococci and Fusobacterium necrophorum in pharyngotonsillitis has been disputed and few prospective studies have evaluated the effect of antibiotic treatment. This study uses registry data to investigate the relation between antibiotic prescription for pharyngotonsillitis in primary healthcare and return visits for pharyngotonsillitis, complications, and tonsillectomy.MethodsRetrospective data were extracted from the regional electronic medical record system in Kronoberg County, Sweden, for all patients diagnosed with pharyngotonsillitis between 2012 and 2016. From these data, two cohorts were formed: one based on rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for group A streptococci (GAS) and one based on routine throat cultures for β-haemolytic streptococci and F. necrophorum. The 90 days following the inclusion visit were assessed for new visits for pharyngotonsillitis, complications, and tonsillectomy, and related to bacterial aetiology and antibiotic prescriptions given at inclusion.ResultsIn the RADT cohort (n = 13,781), antibiotic prescription for patients with a positive RADT for GAS was associated with fewer return visits for pharyngotonsillitis within 30 days compared with no prescription (8.7% vs. 12%; p = 0.02), but not with the complication rate within 30 days (1.5% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.7) or with the tonsillectomy rate within 90 days (0.27% vs. 0.26%; p = 1). In contrast, antibiotic prescription for patients with a negative RADT was associated with more return visits for pharyngotonsillitis within 30 days (9.7% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.01). In the culture cohort (n = 1 370), antibiotic prescription for patients with Streptococcus dysgalactiae ssp. equisimilis was associated with fewer return visits for pharyngotonsillitis within 30 days compared with no prescription (15% vs. 29%; p = 0.03).ConclusionsAntibiotic prescription was associated with fewer return visits for pharyngotonsillitis in patients with a positive RADT for GAS but with more return visits in patients with a negative RADT for GAS. There were no differences in purulent complications related to antibiotic prescription.

The Challenge of Patient Notification and the Work of Follow-Up Generated by a 2-Step Testing Protocol for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Current guidelines recommend confirmatory testing for negative rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for group A streptococcal pharyngitis in children. We sought to describe the work of follow-up generated by this process and frequency of our inability to notify patients of positive results. We retrospectively reviewed laboratory and outreach nurse records of patients who had group A streptococcal pharyngitis testing performed in an academic pediatric emergency department during 2014. For patients with a negative RADT and subsequent positive backup direct nucleic acid probe test, we recorded whether the patient was successfully notified of the positive result, the number of contact attempts, and the time to antibiotic prescription. There were 6504 patients who had an RADT performed, of which 5474 (84.2%) were negative with a confirmatory test performed. There were 234 patients with positive confirmatory testing and not prescribed antibiotics at the time of the initial visit. Of these, 90.1% were ultimately contacted and prescribed appropriate antibiotics, whereas 7.3% were lost to follow-up and 2.6% had potentially unnecessary repeat visits. Of those contacted, 43.1% were reached only after multiple telephone calls or a letter. The median time from the negative RADT to the submission of an electronic prescription was 19.6 hours (interquartile range, 7.5-24.9 hours; range, 6-144 hours). Although confirmatory testing after a negative RADT in children is currently the standard of care, this practice requires a substantial amount of work. Furthermore, a significant fraction of patients are lost to follow-up or have unnecessary repeat visits.

Molecular Testing for Detection of Groups A, C, and G β-Hemolytic Streptococci in Pharyngeal Samples from Children.

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) and large colony-forming group C (GCS) and G (GGS) β-hemolytic streptococci are important causes of acute pharyngitis in children and adults. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis can improve patient care and potentially reduce transmission. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Lyra Direct Strep (LDS) assay for detection of GAS and GCS/GGS compared with traditional culture methods. Pharyngeal samples obtained from 278 children presenting to the emergency department with initial negative GAS rapid antigen detection test (RADT) were used. All samples were cultured as part of routine care and tested in batches using the LDS assay. Of 278 pharyngeal samples with negative GAS RADT, 37 (13.3%) and 63 (22.7%) patients were positive for GAS by culture and LDS assay, respectively. Four (1.4%) patients were positive for GCS or GGS by culture or LDS assay. The LDS assay demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 97.6% and 89.0%, respectively, compared with culture as the gold standard. Repeat culture and an alternate PCR showed that 85.7% (24 of 28) of discrepant samples agreed with findings of the LDS assay. Since implementation, the LDS assay shows a positivity rate of 21.0% (281 of 1340) compared with 11.7% (246 of 2110) by culture in the previous year. We successfully implemented the LDS assay at our institution and have observed a significant increase in the positivity rate of GAS compared with culture. The LDS assay alone allowed for the elimination of β-streptococci screening by culture at our institution.

Caution Needed: Molecular Diagnosis of Pediatric Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis.

Among throat swabs processed in the microbiology laboratory as back-up for negative rapid antigen detection test results, we found a significant increase in the proportion that tested positive for group A streptococci after changing from throat culture to a molecular test.For group A streptococcus testing, our hospital laboratory replaced throat cultures with a stand-alone molecular diagnostic test that takes no more than 1 hour to perform. The prevalence of positive laboratory test results increased significantly (P < .0001) after the change to molecular testing, probably because of the extreme sensitivity of the molecular test.

Improved Diagnostic Performance of an Immunofluorescence-based Rapid Antigen Detection Test for Group A Streptococci in Children With Pharyngitis.

Accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis are important to prevent complications. Most available rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) have shown excellent specificity but often lack sensitivity. Our objective was to compare the diagnostic performances of a new fluorescence-based immunoassay and a classic immunochromatographic RADT using standard throat culture or polymerase chain reaction as references. Prospective observational study in 2 pediatric emergency departments in children 3-15 years of age presenting with pharyngitis and a McIsaac score ≥2. Three throat swabs were obtained simultaneously: one for culture and one for each of both RADTs. Polymerase chain reaction assay of the DNaseB sequence was performed in case of discordant results (culture negative and either RADTs positive). A total of 1002 patients were analyzed, with an overall 37.1% prevalence of GAS pharyngitis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 84.9%*, 96.8%, 94.0% and 91.6% for the new fluorescence-based immunoassay, and 75.3%*, 98.1%, 95.9% and 87.0% for the immunochromatographic test (*P < 0.05). The immunofluorescence-based assay demonstrated improved diagnostic performances over the standard immunochromatographic RADT. Similarly specific for GAS detection, it demonstrates significantly higher sensitivity in children with McIsaac scores 2 or more. A negative result rules out a risk of GAS pharyngitis in 91.6% of children, making it an appropriate tool in pediatric emergency settings. Combined to the low incidence of rheumatic strains, critical appraisal of current practice to routinely perform a backup throat culture from children with pharyngitis and with negative GAS RADT could be reconsidered.

An algorithm to diagnose influenza infection: evaluating the clinical importance and impact on hospital costs of screening with rapid antigen detection tests

Rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) are immunoassays that produce results in 15 min or less, have low sensitivity (50 %), but high specificity (95 %). We studied the clinical impact and laboratory savings of a diagnostic algorithm for influenza infection using RADTs as a first-step technique during the influenza season. From January 15th to March 31st 2014, we performed a diagnostic algorithm for influenza infection consisting of an RADT for all respiratory samples received in the laboratory. We studied all the patients with positive results for influenza infection, dividing them into two groups: Group A with a negative RADT but positive reference tests [reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and/or culture] and Group B with an initial positive RADT. During the study period, we had a total of 1,156 patients with suspicion of influenza infection. Of them, 217 (19 %) had a positive result for influenza: 132 (11 %) had an initial negative RADT (Group A) and 85 (7 %) had a positive RADT (Group B). When comparing patients in Group A and Group B, we found significant differences, as follows: prescribed oseltamivir (67 % vs. 82 %; p = 0.02), initiation of oseltamivir before 24 h (89 % vs. 97 %; p = 0.03), antibiotics prescribed (89 % vs. 67 %; p = <0.01), intensive care unit (ICU) admissions after diagnosis (23 % vs. 14 %; p = 0.05), and need for supplementary oxygen (61 % vs. 47 %; p = 0.01). An influenza algorithm including RADTs as the first step improves the time of administration of proper antiviral therapy, reduces the use of antibiotics and ICU admissions, and decreases hospital costs.

Tests de diagnostic rapide dans les angines de l’enfant

Group A streptococcus (GAS) is the most frequently identified bacterium in children with acute pharyngitis. Clinical signs and symptoms cannot distinguish accurately between viral and GAS pharyngitis. Rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) can identify GAS by an immunologic reaction within a few minutes. Compared to throat culture, most RADTs have a high specificity (around 95 %), allowing antibiotic prescribing on the basis of a positive RADT result. Similarly, the negative predictive value of RADTs seems sufficiently high (around 95 %) to ensure against the presence of GAS in case of a negative RADT result. Among several factors affecting RADT sensitivity, the training and expertise of the person performing the test and the quality of the throat swab specimen seem to be key determinants. Available evidence suggests that clinical prediction rules for the triage of children who should undergo GAS testing are not sufficiently accurate. Implementing RADTs into clinical practice has an important impact on antibiotic prescription rates, for a reduction of about 30 %. French guidelines that recommend using RADTs in all children above 3 years of age presenting with pharyngitis without backup culture of negative tests seem relevant in this context.

Reflexive culture in adolescents and adults with group A streptococcal pharyngitis.

Guidelines currently provide conflicting recommendations regarding the diagnosis of group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis in adults. Clinical guidelines state that negative rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) do not require confirmation by a backup method in adults, whereas laboratory-based guidelines mandate confirmation of a negative RADT in patients of all ages. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of reflexive culture following a negative RADT in adolescents and adults with suspected GAS pharyngitis. A retrospective analysis of 726 patients, aged ≥13 years, with negative RADTs and positive GAS throat cultures, was performed between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2011 at 2 academic medical centers in Seattle, Washington. Complication rates, treatment, modified Centor score, and bacterial burden in patients with negative RADTs and positive GAS throat cultures were assessed. Modified Centor scores ≥2 were observed in 55% of patients with a negative RADT and positive GAS culture. Of these, 77% of patients had a moderate or heavy bacterial burden (≥2+). RADTs failed to detect some patients who presented with serious complications of GAS pharyngitis: 29 (4.0%) had peritonsillar abscesses and 2 (0.28%) were diagnosed with acute rheumatic fever. Providers found culture results to be useful for initiating antibiotic therapy or confirming a clinical diagnosis. Antibiotic treatment was prescribed in 68.7% of patients, with culture-directed initiation of therapy documented in 43.5%. Reflexive GAS culture is clinically useful when RADTs are negative. RADTs fail to detect a substantial number of adult patients with clinically significant pharyngitis who can benefit from treatment.

Empirical validation of Polish guidelines for the management of acute streptococcal pharyngitis in children

ObjectiveGroup A Streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis is currently the only commonly occurring form of acute pharyngitis for which antibiotic therapy is definitely indicated. Polish guidelines advocate the use of modified Centor score (MCS) to assess the probability of GAS pharyngitis. They advise performing throat culture or rapid antigen detection test (RADT) in children with score 2–3 in MCS and treating with antibiotic only those in whom GAS was detected. Negative RADT results should be confirmed by culture. In children with score 4, the guidelines allow to introduce empiric antibiotic therapy. Phenoxymethyl penicillin is recommended as a drug of choice to treat GAS pharyngitis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of strategy recommended by Polish guidelines in identifying those children with acute pharyngitis who require antibiotic treatment. Hence, diagnostic values of score 4 in MCS and RADT were assessed using throat culture as a reference standard. Phenoxymethyl penicillin efficacy in GAS eradication and prevention of post-streptococcal complications were estimated as well. MethodsNinety children between 2 and 15 years of age with acute pharyngitis symptoms suggesting GAS etiology (MCS≥2), participated in our study. At the initial visit MCS was evaluated and two throat swabs were collected to perform RADT and culture. In children with GAS pharyngitis treated with penicillin, microbiological cure was assessed by performing two control throat cultures. Next, children were under observation for 3 months. ResultsPositive predictive value of score 4 in MCS turned out to be 48.05% (95% CI: 36.5–59.7%). RADT sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy proved to be 100%, 96%, and 98%, respectively. GAS eradication rate in children treated with penicillin turned out to be 92.5%. No post-streptococcal sequelae occurred in any child in 3-month observation. ConclusionsEmpiric antibiotic therapy in children with score 4 in MCS will result in significant overtreatment of those with nonstreptococcal pharyngitis. New generation RADT diagnostic value in GAS detection proved to be equivalent to that of culture, which obviates the need of backup culture in children with negative RADT results. Phenoxymethyl penicillin revealed high eradication efficacy and proved to prevent post-streptococcal sequelae in children with acute GAS pharyngitis.

Management of Adults with Acute Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Minimal Value for Backup Strep Testing and Overuse of Antibiotics

Rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are commonly used to guide appropriate antibiotic treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis. In adults, there is controversy about the need for routine backup testing of negative RADT. Estimate the costs and benefits in adults of routine backup testing by DNA Gen-probe of negative RADT (Acceava). Observational follow-up study. All patients aged 18 years and older visiting a Cleveland Clinic generalist physician in 2009 and 2010 with a visit diagnosis of acute pharyngitis (ICD codes 462, 034.0). The patients were identified using the Cleveland Clinic Epic Clarity database. We determined the proportion of false negative RADT, antibiotic prescription patterns and rate of serious suppurative complications within 30 days of the office visit. Of 25,130 patients with acute pharyngitis, 19% had no testing and 81% were tested. Of the 15,555 patients that had a negative RADT and follow-up DNA probe, 6% had a positive DNA probe. Of the 953 patients who had a negative RADT and a positive DNA strep probe, 48% received an antibiotic prescription at the time of the visit and 51% received an antibiotic prescription after an average of 2.3 days. Only one patient with a negative RADT and no follow-up DNA probe developed a peritonsillar abscess. Overall, of the 15,555 DNA probes performed, management was altered in only 3% of the patients at a total cost of $1,757,715. Fifty-six percent received an antibiotic while only 19.5% had a confirmed strep throat diagnosis. The false negative rate of Acceava RADT for the diagnosis of GABHS pharyngitis was 6%. We question the benefit of routine DNA probe backup testing in adults because of its substantial cost, an average delay in antibiotic prescribing of over 2 days, and because suppurative complications are very uncommon. We found a high rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.

Spectrum and Inoculum Size Effect of a Rapid Antigen Detection Test for Group A Streptococcus in Children with Pharyngitis

BackgroundThe stability of the accuracy of a diagnostic test is critical to whether clinicians can rely on its result. We aimed to assess whether the performance of a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for group A streptococcus (GAS) is affected by the clinical spectrum and/or bacterial inoculum size.MethodsThroat swabs were collected from 785 children with pharyngitis in an office-based, prospective, multicenter study (2009–2010). We analysed the effect of clinical spectrum (i.e., the McIsaac score and its components) and inoculum size (light or heavy GAS growth) on the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values) of a RADT, with laboratory throat culture as the reference test. We also evaluated the accuracy of a McIsaac-score–based decision rule.ResultsGAS prevalence was 36% (95CI: 33%–40%). The inoculum was heavy for 85% of cases (81%–89%). We found a significant spectrum effect on sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and positive predictive value (p<0.05) but not negative predictive value, which was stable at about 92%. RADT sensitivity was greater for children with heavy than light inoculum (95% vs. 40%, p<0.001). After stratification by inoculum size, the spectrum effect on RADT sensitivity was significant only in patients with light inoculum, on univariate and multivariate analysis. The McIsaac-score–based decision rule had 99% (97%–100%) sensitivity and 52% (48%–57%) specificity.ConclusionsVariations in RADT sensitivity only occur in patients with light inocula. Because the spectrum effect does not affect the negative predictive value of the test, clinicians who want to rule out GAS can rely on negative RADT results regardless of clinical features if they accept that about 10% of children with negative RADT results will have a positive throat culture. However, such a policy is more acceptable in populations with very low incidence of complications of GAS infection.

Repetition of the rapid antigen test in initially negative supposed streptococcal pharyngitis is not necessary in adults

To determine whether the repetition of the rapid antigen detection test (RADT) in patients, with a high suspicion of presenting pharyngitis by group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS), with a previously negative test improves the validity of the test. Two hundred and twenty-two patients aged 14 years or more with acute pharyngitis and two or more Centor criteria--tonsillar exudates, fever, tenderness in the lymph glands and/or absence of cough--were consecutively recruited. In all patients, a pharyngotonsillar sample was obtained with two swabs, one for the RADT (OSOM Strep A Genzyme test, Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA) and the other was sent to the Department of Microbiology for culture. In patients with a negative RADT, the determination was repeated. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were determined. Cultures were positive for GABHS in 55 patients (24.8%). Three false-negatives and 14 false-positives were observed by comparing the rapid test with throat culture, achieving a sensitivity of 94.5% and a specificity of 91.6%. Positive and negative predictive values were 78.8% and 98.1% respectively. Taking the second determination in the negative cases into account, the results were 96.4%, 91.6%, 79.1% and 98.7% respectively. The negative predictive value achieved with the RADT determination was very high. Repetition of the test only slightly improved this percentage, making repetition of this test unnecessary.

Évolution de la pratique du test diagnostic rapide (TDR) de l’angine streptococcique parmi les médecins généralistes, maîtres de stage de la faculté de médecine Paris Descartes : 2005–2007

The distribution of the Rapid Antigen Detection Test (RADT) and the National Health Insurance's information campaign should efficiently reduce the unjustified use antibiotic. However, a preliminary survey among GP trainers at the Paris Descartes University indicated that the RADT was seldom used. ObjectivesThis study had for aim to describe the RADT use trend among trainers since 2005 and the main obstacles to its widespread use, and to assess the Mac Isaac score use and antibiotic prescriptions. MethodsBetween February and May 2007, a survey was carried out among 66 GPs who were required to report their first ten patients over three years of age presenting with pharyngitis. RADT use and antibiotic prescriptions were compared with those of the 2005 survey. ResultsRADT use had decreased (52.5% [48.2–56.8] versus 57.5% [52.1–68.8], p<0.05). GPs did not use the RADT because they considered it “useless in decision making”. Clinical findings were sufficient in most cases. The Mac Isaac score was not widely used by GPs (28.3%) and antibiotic prescription had increased except for macrolides which had decreased (10% vs 15%). Among patients with a negative RADT, 11.9% (vs 10.5% en 2005, p<0.001) were prescribed antibiotics. ConclusionsThe RADT use decreased in two years among GP trainers. GPs still prescribe treatment according to clinical findings, most without using diagnostic tools.

Throat Culture Is Necessary After Negative Rapid Antigen Detection Tests

This study was conducted to determine if culture confirmation is needed for a negative rapid antigen detection test. Data on 18,509 tests done in patients younger than 18 years old were reviewed. Of the 14,167 (76.5%) that were negative, 968 (6.8%) were associated with positive cultures. No significant seasonal variation was noted. Significant differences were found between hospital and pediatric practices in the percentage of patients with a negative rapid antigen detection test who actually had group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (3.5% to 9.8%). This study supports the recommendation of culture confirmation of a negative rapid antigen detection test and validation of results within an individual practice if confirmatory cultures are not being performed. This study showed a high false-negative rate of the negative rapid antigen detection test and variation among hospital and pediatric practices for rates of positive culture after a negative rapid antigen detection test.

Compliance of Resident and Staff Physicians With IDSA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Streptococcal Pharyngitis

We evaluated physician's compliance with the Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines for diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis in the emergency room. Of the 1423 episodes of acute pharyngitis evaluated, 38% received care by supervised resident physicians. Physicians prescribed antibiotics for 75% of the episodes. Diagnostic tests were obtained in only 519 episodes (36%). Among patients tested, 38% had positive results for GAS. Among patients with negative rapid antigen detection test and/or throat culture, 25% were inappropriately treated with antibiotics. Eighty-nine percent of patients who were not tested with rapid antigen detection test or culture were prescribed an antibiotic. As the number of clinical criteria increased, the likelihood for diagnostic testing for GAS decreased, whereas the likelihood for antibiotic treatment increased. There was no difference in disease management by resident or staff physicians. We conclude that both resident and staff physicians in this emergency room setting exhibited limited compliance with the Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines for GAS pharyngitis.