This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of an infection control simulation using mixed reality, comparing simulation fidelity with a high-fidelity mannequin (MN) group and problem-based learning with written cases group. This study used a three-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design. Two universities with similar curricula were conveniently selected, and a total of 72 nursing students were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups of 24 each. In the final analysis, there were 22 participants in the mixed reality groups, 21 in the mannequin groups, and 23 in the problem-based learning with written cases groups. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the χ 2 , Kruskal-Wallis, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. The mixed reality groups had a significantly positive effect on clinical reasoning ability and clinical competence than the problem-based learning with written cases groups, whereas the mannequin groups had a significantly positive effect on clinical competence than the problem-based learning with written cases groups. Mixed reality simulation is an appropriate simulation method that enhances learning immersion, satisfaction, and self-confidence in simulation. Additionally, it can substitute for mannequin simulation in terms of clinical reasoning ability and clinical competence. This study suggests that it is important to the various approaches in simulation fidelity to diversely enhance the competency of nursing students in simulation outcomes.
Read full abstract