Abstract Introduction His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) is an increasingly used technique due to its benefits. The transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has in turn been growing and surpasses the number of procedures than surgical aortic valve replacement, however, the main disadvantage with respect to the surgical technique is a greater risk of atrioventricular block and the need for permanent pacing. Purpose Assess the feasibility of HPCSP in patients after TAVR, the success rates and the pacing thresholds. Methods We present a series of consecutive patients (undergoing TAVI in a single center with need for subsequent ventricular stimulation (n=58), from March 2019 to July 2023, performing HPCSP as the first stimulation option. Results We achieved HPCSP in 49 of 58 patients (84.5%). Patients had a mean age of 81.5 years, 60.3% men, mean LVEF 53.82 ± 12.4%. His bundle pacing (HBP) was successful as first option in 41.4% of cases, and left bundle branch area (LBBAP) in 43,1 % of cases (73.5% of the remaining 58.6%) , while the other 9 patients (15.5%) were pace conventionally at right ventricle, septal or wireless. HBP thresholds and R-wave amplitudes at implantation were 0.99 ± 0.72 at 0.5 ms, 4.59 ± 3.67 mV), remaining stable at follow-up at 1 month (1.16 ± 0.92 at 0.5 ms, 4.17 ± 3.97 mV),. Average QRS width was40.8 ± 21.3 ms pre and 122.43 ± 15.2 ms post). LBBAP pacing thresholds and R-wave amplitudes were(0.89 ± 0.45 at 0.5 ms, 6.145 ± 5.3 mV)at implant, and were stable at follow-up at 1 month (0.75 ± 0.3 at 0.5 ms, 8.41 ± 5.8 mV), with no improvements on QRS (129.75 ± 21.01 ms pre, 134.13 ± 17.34 ms post). During a mean follow-up of 23 months. There has been no acute elevation of thresholds or need for reintervention. Only 6 patients have died (10.3%), 2 of them (33%) from cardiovascular causes. Conclusions HPCSP is feasible as a routine techniquein patients after TAVR who need a pacemaker implantation, with low pacing thresholds, which remained stable on the follow-up.
Read full abstract