Abstract Aim Robust data show that atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can improve left ventricular function and prevent cardiovascular complications in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The effectiveness and safety of AF ablation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less well characterized. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 785 consecutive patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing AF ablation in a high-volume center including 251 with AF and HFpEF. We compared baseline parameters, procedural details and procedural complications by heart failure status. Results Patients with HFpEF (n=251/785) were older (median age 70 years vs. 64 years; p < 0.05) and more frequently female (48.2% vs. 32.2%; p < 0.05) compared to patients without HF. Symptom severity was comparable with a median European Heart Rhythm Association score of 2 in both groups (p > 0.05). Arterial (71.7% vs. 59.7%, p < 0.05), diabetes (16.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.05) and dyslipidemia (41.4% vs. 27.2%, p < 0.05) were more common in patients with AF and HFpEF. Acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in all patients using cryoballoon or radiofrequency energy with similar frequency in both groups (cryoballoon ablation: 37.8% vs. 41.6%; p > 0.05). A subgroup of patients in both groups additionally underwent cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for coexistent atrial flutter (26% vs. 20.7%; p > 0.05). Procedure times (119.4 ± 47.7 min vs. 120.2 ± 48.3 min; p > 0.05) and fluoroscopy times (15.8 ± 10.4 min vs. 15.5 ± 7.1 min; p > 0.05) were comparable. Overall complication rates did not differ (12.7% vs. 10.3%; p > 0.05). While the incidence of pericardial tamponades was slightly higher (2% vs. 0%), other severe and minor complications showed no significant differences, including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA; 0.4% vs. 0.6%), major life-threatening bleeding (0% vs. 0.2%), vascular complications (1.6% vs. 2.1%), phrenic nerve palsy (0.8% vs. 1.5%), and pulmonary vein stenosis (0.4 vs. 0%). The mean in-hospital stay for the procedure was 2 days in both groups (p > 0.05). In-hospital recurrence rates were similar (12.4% vs. 17%; p > 0.05), as was the need for electrical cardioversion before discharge (5.6% vs. 6.6%; p > 0.05). Conclusion Patients with HFpEF undergoing AF ablation were older, more frequently female, and have more comorbidities than patients without heart failure. Acute procedural success and acute complication rates appear low. These data encourage randomized evaluations of the safety and efficacy of ablation-based rhythm control therapy in patients with AF and HFpEF.
Read full abstract