Need For Analgesia Research Articles

Comparing the Effect of Topical Lignocaine and Bupivacaine in Nasal Packs for Pain Relief in Post Operative Nasal Surgery Patients

This randomized controlled trial compared the analgesic efficacy of lignocaine, bupivacaine, and placebo nasal packs in patients undergoing nasal surgeries, including septoplasty and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). A total of 100 patients, aged 18–60 years, were randomly assigned into three groups: lignocaine (n=34), bupivacaine (n=33), and placebo (n=33). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) over 24 hours. Additional analgesic requirements, side effects, recovery time, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Bupivacaine provided significantly lower pain scores at all intervals compared to lignocaine and placebo (p < 0.05). The bupivacaine group had a lower need for additional analgesics (39.4%) compared to lignocaine (76.5%) and placebo (81.8%) (p = 0.041). Side effects such as nausea and vomiting were similar across all groups. The bupivacaine group experienced a shorter hospital stay (2.0 days) compared to the lignocaine (2.5 days) and placebo (3.0 days) groups (p = 0.038). In conclusion, bupivacaine-soaked nasal packs offer superior pain relief, reduce the need for additional analgesics, and shorten hospital stays, making it a preferable option for postoperative pain management in nasal surgeries.

Potential of diacerein in combination with aerobic exercise in comprehensive treatment of knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is a common degenerative disease characterized by cartilage destruction and inflammatory changes in the synovial membrane. Obesity and metabolic syndrome are significant risk factors that exacerbate inflammatory processes and contribute to the progression of osteoarthritis. Modern treatment methods include both pharmacological agents and non-pharmacological approaches such as aerobic exercise. AIM: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of diacerein combined with aerobic physical activity (Nordic walking) in the comprehensive treatment of knee osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 65 patients aged 45 to 70 years with knee osteoarthritis and metabolic syndrome. The participants were divided into three groups. The first group received diacerein (Artrocare); the second group was engaged in Nordic walking; the third group – a combination of these methods. The visual analog scale of pain, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, quality of life (Short Form-36), glycated hemoglobin levels, and other biochemical parameters were assessed over 16 weeks of observation. RESULTS: The study demonstrated statistically significant reductions in pain levels and improvements in functional parameters in all the groups. The greatest improvements were observed in the group receiving combined therapy. The method showed a significantly positive impact on quality of life and reduced the need for analgesics in comorbid patients. Additionally, the patients with metabolic syndrome showed improved biochemical parameters with the combination of diacerein and Nordic walking. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of diacerein and Nordic walking is an effective and safe method for treating knee osteoarthritis, particularly in patients with metabolic syndrome. This approach significantly reduces pain, improves joint function, and enhances overall quality patient’s life.

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of quadratus lumborum and transversus abdominis muscle blocks for postoperative pain relief during laparoscopic robot-assisted total hysterectomy.

The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and transversus abdominis plane bloc block (TAPB) after laparoscopic robot-assisted total hysterectomy. Materials and methods. A prospective study of female patients (n=101), with physical status ASA I-II, who underwent laparoscopic robot-assisted total hysterectomy under multicomponent general anesthesia. In random order, patients were randomized into three groups: the first group (CON, n=40) - control, where no blocks were performed, the second group (TAPB, n=30) - a blockade of the transverse abdominis muscle, the third group (QLB, n= 31) – blockade of the quadratus lumborum muscle was performed. After surgery, pain was assessed using a 10-point digital visual analogue scale, and postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed. (PONV) Average arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded. Additionally, the next morning, a survey was conducted to assess the well-being and satisfaction of patients. Results. There were no differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics, duration of surgery, and analgesic consumption during the intraoperative period. The severity of postoperative pain was higher (p<0.05) in the control group than in the blockade groups. Both block groups demonstrated lower pain scores at all time points assessed. The latest need for analgesics was in the QLB group. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) values differed only in the first 2 hours after surgery between the CON and TAPB groups (p<0.05). PONV one hour after surgery was more observed in the control group and less in the QLB group (p<0.05). According to the results of a survey conducted on the day after surgery, the number of patients satisfied with the anesthesia and assistance provided in the recovery room in the groups with blockade (TAPB, QLB) was 2.1-5.3% higher (p>0.05). More patients from the QLB group (p<0.05) noted very good and good health, and most patients (p<0.05) from the CON and TAPB group noted satisfactory health. Conclusion. The use of interfascial blocks for postoperative pain relief (TAPB, QLB) after laparoscopic robot-assisted hysterectomy improves the quality of pain relief and the well-being of patients. Benefits of QLB include better pain relief, reduced incidence of PONV, and greater patient satisfaction. TARP has shown equally good results, and this method is easier to perform.

No benefit from the addition of low-dose ketamine infusion to standard evidence-based care of patients with multiple rib fractures.

Multiple rib fractures from blunt thoracic trauma cause significant morbidity. Optimal current management includes multimodal analgesia, pulmonary hygiene, and early mobilization. Low-dose ketamine infusion (LDKI) has been proposed as an adjunctive analgesic in this setting. A prior study reported decreased pain scores with LDKI in patients with multiple rib fractures. We hypothesized that LDKI would decrease morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) in patients with multiple rib fractures. A prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed in adult (18 years or older) patients with three or more rib fractures. A prestudy power analysis calculated an 80% chance of identifying a 15% decrease in MMEs with 50 subjects. The study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent obtained in all subjects. Demographic (age, sex) and injury specific information (Injury Severity Score, number of rib fractures) were obtained. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive continuous LDKI (0.1 mg/kg/h) or placebo infusion (0.9% NaCl) for ≤48 hours. All patients received a standard evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol for rib fractures management. Primary outcome measure was MME use or pulmonary complications. Statistical comparison of LDKI versus placebo was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. All 50 enrolled subjects (placebo, 25; LDKI, 25) received study drug infusion. The two groups were well matched for age, Injury Severity Score, and number of rib fractures. We observed no differences in the Day 1 (p = 0.961), Day 2 (p = 0.373), or total MMEs (p = 0.946) between groups. Similar total MME use was observed when subjects who received ≥40 hours of study drug and were compared (p = 0.924). Use of LDKI did not alter subsequent need for opiate analgesics postinfusion, hospital length of stay, pulmonary complications, or need for readmission. The addition of LDKI to an established multimodal, evidence-based protocol for management of multiple rib fractures did not decrease opiate usage or impact pulmonary complications. Therapeutic/Care Managaement; Level I.

Hyoscine-n-butylbromide in treating abdominal pain caused by gastroenteritis: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

Hyoscine-N-butylbromide (HBB) is an anticholinergic agent widely used to treat pain caused by spasms in the gastrointestinal and urogenital systems. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of HBB with a placebo in treating abdominal cramping pain caused by acute gastroenteritis in the emergency department (ED). This was a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial conducted in a single-center academic ED from September to November 2021. Patients aged 18-65 years with acute gastroenteritis symptoms were included. The study compared the efficacy of intravenous HBB (20 mg) to a placebo. The primary outcome was the absolute change in pain score at 30 min after treatment, with secondary outcomes including pain relief at 60 min, adverse events, and the need for rescue analgesics. Fifty patients were randomized (25 in each group). There was no significant difference in 30-min and 60-min pain scores between the groups. At 60 min, pain reduction and the need for rescue analgesia were similar in both groups. Changes in pain scores from admission to 30 and 60 min did not significantly differ between the groups. Intravenous HBB did not show a statistically or clinically significant difference in pain reduction compared to a placebo in patients with acute gastroenteritis and cramping abdominal pain in the ED.

Experience of using multimodal opioid-saving anesthesia in children: single-center prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: In the protocols of rapid recovery after surgery, it is recommended to avoid long-term administration and/ or high doses of opioids in order to reduce the severity of their adverse reactions in the postoperative period. In this regard, opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) may become a promising approach to the treatment of cancer patients. AIM. To evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal OSA in the scheme "dexmedetomidine+ketamine (in subanesthetic doses)+lidocaine (intravenous infusion)" in pediatric oncosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center prospective randomized study involved 40 children aged 12 to 18 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the method of anesthesia: in group I (n=20), combined endotracheal anesthesia with opioids was performed, in group II (n=20) — multimodal OCA based on intravenous infusion of lidocaine, dexmedetomidine and subanesthetic doses of ketamine. The patients underwent extended operations in the head and neck area in the volume of thyroidectomy with fascial-sheath lymph dissection and excision of the central tissue of the neck from 2 sides. RESULTS: With stable intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, the median total intraoperative need for analgesics in group II was: for lidocaine— 351 (289.6; 418.5) mg (which is 1.75mg/kg per hour), for dexmedetomidine— 88.2 (38.5; 119.7) µg, for ketamine — 21.6 (17.4; 27.3mg. In group I, the median total intraoperative need for fentanyl was 273.7 (406; 240.9)µg. In addition, in group I, the median amount required for postoperative analgesia of the synthetic opioid analgesic tramadol was 419 (365.6; 479)mg (which is 7.8mg/kg; p=0.01). In group II, the median amount of lidocaine required for postoperative analgesia (1 mg/kg per hour) turned out to be 1377.3 (735.7; 1894)mg, while additional tramadol administration at a dose of 57.3 (28.5; 107.7)mg was required in only 7(35%) patients. CONCLUSION: Multimodal OSA based on dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, ketamine and sevoflurane is an effective and safe method of anesthesia in children from 12 to 18 years old, which is not inferior to opioid analgesics in the treatment of perioperative pain during surgical interventions on the thyroid and parathyroid glands in cancer patients, and also reduces the number of adverse reactions characteristic of opioids.

Strategies for Managing Pediatric Fracture Pain: Assessment, Pharmacological, and Non-Pharmacological Interventions.

Fractures are prevalent among the pediatric population, with approximately 1 in 3 children experiencing at least 1 fracture during childhood. Children are not just little adults; they have unique needs in pain management. With a lack of knowledge in pediatric pain management, medical staff primarily focus on the fractures, often overlooking and inadequately addressing pain. There is a scarcity of literature on acute fracture pain for children, while a wealth of literature summarizes chronic and tumor-related pain in children, which is not suitable for addressing pain caused by fractures. Therefore, a pain management literature review grounded in clinical experience is essential to provide guidance to doctors and parents on safely and effectively reducing the pain associated with children's fractures. We conducted a thorough review of existing literature and summarized treatment experiences into the 3 areas of pain assessment, non-pharmacological treatments, and pharmacological treatments. First, we evaluated and analyzed existing pain assessment methods, identifying the most suitable tools for different age groups. Second, we explored non-pharmacological treatments suitable for children with fractures to alleviate mild to moderate pain and reduce the need for analgesics. Lastly, we reviewed pharmacological treatments. For moderate pain, we recommend administering non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. For severe pain, we suggest opioid medications, providing detailed information on usage and contraindications for different age groups. Therefore, this article aimed to review the evaluation and management of pain in children with bone fracture, and covers aspects of pediatric pain characteristics, pain assessment tools, pharmacological therapy, and non-pharmacologic therapy.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy with tadalafil, tamsulosin, and silodosin for distal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveMedical expulsive therapy (MET) is a suitable option for facilitating stone expulsion in patients with distal ureteral stones. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of tamsulosin, silodosin, tadalafil monotherapy, and combinations on stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET), as well as their comparative safety, number of colic pain episodes, and need for analgesics. MethodsRandomized controlled trials were retrieved by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 27, 2023. Papers in-English that compared the safety and efficacy of at least two of the above agents in adults with distal ureteral stones ≤10 mm were included. ResultsIn total, 27 studies were identified. More than half of them (n=15, 55.6%) were conducted in India. SER significantly improved with silodosin compared with tamsulosin (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, p<0.001), whereas the difference in SET was non-significant. Tadalafil achieved a significantly higher SER compared with tamsulosin (OR 1.42, p=0.040) without any difference in SET. Subgroup analysis of 5- and 10-mg doses of tadalafil showed no significant difference in SER and SET. We found no significant difference in need for analgesic (mean difference [MD −53.73, p=0.200) or the mean number of colic episodes (MD −0.42, p=0.06) between tadalafil and tamsulosin. SER and SET were not significantly different between silodosin and tadalafil. Tadalafil plus tamsulosin led to a significantly higher SER (OR 1.87, p<0.001) and SET (MD −2.99, p=0.002) compared with tamsulosin, without any significant difference in the adverse effects. ConclusionCompared with tamsulosin, SER significantly improved with silodosin, tadalafil, and the combination of tadalafil plus tamsulosin. Meanwhile, the difference in SET was only significant between tadalafil plus tamsulosin versus tamsulosin. It appears that tadalafil and silodosin have similar efficacy in SET and SER. All METs had comparable safety.

The impact of different music genres on pain tolerance: emphasizing the significance of individual music genre preferences

Music is a promising (adjunctive) treatment for both acute and chronic pain, reducing the need for pharmacological analgesics and their side effects. Yet, little is known about the effect of different types of music. Hence, we investigated the efficacy of five music genres (Urban, Electronic, Classical, Rock and Pop) on pain tolerance. In this parallel randomized experimental study, we conducted a cold pressor test in healthy volunteers (n = 548). The primary outcome was pain tolerance, measured in seconds. No objective (tolerance time) or subjective (pain intensity and unpleasantness) differences were found among the five genres. Multinomial logistic regression showed that overall genre preference positively influenced pain tolerance. In contrast, the music genres that participants thought would help for pain relief did not. Our study was the first to investigate pain tolerance at genre level and in the context of genre preference without self-selecting music. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that listening to a favored music genre has a significant positive influence on pain tolerance, irrespective of the kind of genre. Our results emphasize the importance of individual music (genre) preference when looking at the analgesic benefits of music. This should be considered when implementing music in the clinical setting.

The Effect of Manual Maneuver on Shoulder Pain of Laparoscopic Gynecology Surgery, a Randomized Clinical Trial Study

Background: Shoulder pain following gynecological laparoscopy is a common complication that requires treatment. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of manual maneuvers on shoulder pain following laparoscopic surgery in women. Methods: This parallel clinical trial was conducted with 77 female laparoscopy candidates referred to Yas Hospital in Tehran in 2023. After the laparoscopic procedure, the intervention group had CO2 gas actively removed from the abdomen during a two-handed abdominal massage, while the control group received only traditional passive gas evacuation. The intensity of pain was assessed 6- and 24-hours post-operation using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the number of painkillers and anti-nausea medications used was recorded in each patient's chart. All data were entered into SPSS software and analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. Results: The average age of the women was 39.4 ± 10.1 years, and the average body mass index (BMI) was 27.5 ± 2.5 kg/m². No significant difference was observed between the two groups in these characteristics. Six hours after the operation, the pain intensity was 4.6 ± 0.86 in the intervention group and 6.2 ± 1.1 in the control group, with a significant reduction in the intervention group (P = 0.001). Twenty-four hours post-operation, pain intensity was 2.7 ± 0.79 in the intervention group and 4.2 ± 1.1 in the control group, again showing a significant decrease in the intervention group (P = 0.001). Additionally, the need for analgesics was significantly lower in the intervention group (P = 0.001). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that manual abdominal massage following laparoscopic surgery can significantly reduce shoulder pain, decrease the need for analgesics, and enhance patient satisfaction.

Racial Disparities in Anesthesia Care: A Systematic Review of Pain Management and Patient Outcomes.

Racial disparities in healthcare are a prominent issue that needs to be addressed to improve the quality of care for all patients. There are several disparities and biases related to the perceived pain tolerance people of color (POC) patients have and their need for analgesics. These biases lead to inadequate pain management and decreased health outcomes. Our study aims to highlight these disparities and how they impact the care patients receive, specifically in the field of anesthesia. To conduct this study, a comprehensive systematic literature search was performed, articles were included and removed according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a systematic review was performed. Sixteen papers that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected, and after data collection, correlations between POC and pain tolerance were assessed throughout the articles. The studies reviewed showed that there may be some correlation between racial background and perceived pain tolerance. While some studies found that racial disparities may negatively impact the care POC patients receive, others found that there was no correlation at all. Regardless, more studies need to be conducted to assess the factors influencing the treatment of POC in anesthesia.

Comparing the effects of intrathecal and intra-articular magnesium sulfate and fentanyl on pain after knee arthroscopy; double-blind clinical trial

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intrathecal and intra-articular magnesium sulfate (IA-Mg) and fentanyl on pain after knee arthroscopy (KA). Materials and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 2022–2023. One hundred and forty candidates for KA were randomly allocated to four groups, namely intrathecal magnesium sulfate, IA-Mg, intrathecal fentanyl (IT-F), and intra-articular fentanyl. A medical intern used a 0–10 visual analog scale to assess participants’ post-KA pain at recovery and 1, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after KA. Participants with a pain score of more than 4 were provided with intravenous pethidine 25 mg. Data were analyzed at a significance level of &lt; 0.05 and using the SPSS software (version 22.0). Results: No significant difference was found among the groups respecting participants’ arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, and KA duration (P &gt; 0.05). The mean score of pain significantly increased in all study groups (P &lt; 0.05) and the mean score of pain in the IA-Mg group was significantly less than the other groups (P = 0.001). Respecting postoperative complications, only six cases from the IT-F group experienced pruritus (P = 0.001). Conclusion: IA-Mg can significantly reduce post-KA pain and the need for postoperative analgesics. Therefore, it may be a safe and effective adjacent therapy for post-KA pain management.

Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Low Dose Hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine on Haemodynamic Parameters in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Prostate.

To determine the role of dexmedetomidine in potentiating the local anaesthetic efficacy of a low dose of bupivacaine when used as an adjuvant. A prospective, double-blind, randomised study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan, from July 2021 to February 2022. One hundred and eight patients of ASA physical class I-III undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under sub-arachnoid block (SAB) were enroled and distributed into two equal groups. Group BUPIPURE (BP) was given 7.5 mg of pure 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacain whereas group BUPIDEX (BD) was given 6 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacain with 3 μg dexmedetomidine intrathecally. The effects in Both groups were compared using chi-square and unpaired t-tests. A significance level of p <0.05 was used to evaluate the statistical significance. Both groups demonstrated a steady decrease in mean heart rate (mean HR 98.9-62.7 per minute as compared to 79.1-59.4 per minute in groups BP and BD, respectively), however, no patient reached to HR <50/min. Group BP had a higher HR variability than group BD. The two groups' median peak sensory levels were similar. However, a statistically significant difference was revealed in the time taken for 2-segment regression (87.5 ± 11.3 min vs. 115.5 ± 6.2 min p <0.001 in BP and BD), as well as the time to reach T10 sensory level (13.56 ± 2.5 min vs. 10.9 ± 3.0 min p <0.001). In patients having TURP, intrathecal dexmedetomidine combined with low-dose bupivacaine results in a quicker start, extended sensory and motor block, and a decreased need for rescue analgesics. Adjuvants, Dexmedetomidine, Spinal anaesthesia, Transurethral Resection of Prostate.

Comparison of Hemodynamic and Recovery Profile Between Segmental Thoracic Spinal and General Anesthesia in Upper Abdominal and Breast Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) has been described primarily as case reports for performing upper abdominal and thoracic surgeries in significant respiratory comorbid patients. A few comparative studies have recently evaluated the technique as an advantageous alternative to general anesthesia (GA). However, there is no systematic evaluation and comparison of the techniques. The present systematic review evaluated the hemodynamic, comfort, and satisfaction of patients undergoing abdominal and thoracic surgeries under STSA and GA. PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar Advanced, and citation tracking were performed to find suitable articles that compared STSA and GA. The primary objective-related data were hypotension and bradycardia. The secondary objective-related data in the context of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV), pain, rescue analgesics, sedation requirement, satisfaction, and comfort were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed for dichotomous data on hypotension, bradycardia, and PONV; odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Data of 394 patients from six studies were evaluated. Patients undergoing upper abdominal and breast surgeries under STSA had significantly higher odds of hypotension (Fixed-Effect Model OR 12.23, 95% CI 2.81-53.28; I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 12.01, 95% CI 2.75-52.52; I2 =0%) and bradycardia (Fixed-Effect Model OR 10.95, 95% CI 2.94-40.74, I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 9.97, 95% CI 2.61-38.08; I2 =0%) but lower odds of PONV (Fixed-Effect Model OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.43; I2 =0%, and the Random Effects Model OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.45; I2 =0%). Most of the patients undergoing STSA were given intravenous sedation to overcome anxiety and discomfort. Overall, patient satisfaction was on par with GA. However, few surgeons were unenthusiastic about the technique while performing axillary clearances due to bothering twitches from cautery. STSA led to early post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge and provided better pain control, lowering the need for rescue analgesics and opioid consumption in the first 24-hour postoperative period. STSA is associated with very high odds of hypotension and bradycardia as compared to GA. On the other hand, STSA demonstrated superior pain control, reduced opioid requirements, shorter PACU stays, and significantly reduced risk of PONV. Nevertheless, STSA patients mostly require sedation to make the patient comfortable.

Effect of non-invasive bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery: a randomized controlled study.

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of preoperative sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) on postoperative pain and assess intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. In this prospective, randomized controlled study, 72 patients were included and divided into two groups: group 1 (36 patients) received the sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB), while group 2 (36 patients) served as the control group. Patient assessments, using the numerical rating scale (NRS), were conducted at the postoperative first hour, fourth hour, and 24th hour. Additionally, intraoperative hemodynamics, analgesic requirements, and postoperative analgesic requirements were documented. The patients in group 1 exhibited significantly lower NRS scores at postoperative first, fourth, and 24th hour than those in group 2 (P<0.001 for all three time points). Additionally, the mean Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (RSAS) scores were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (P=0.006). Both intraoperative remifentanil use and postoperative analgesic consumption were significantly higher in patients in group 2 (P<0.001 and 0.004, respectively) than those in group 1. Analysis of intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) revealed that patients in group 1 had lower postoperative heart rates (P=0.040) than those in group 2, and MAP values after intraoperative block, at 30 min, and postoperatively were significantly lower (P=0.005, P=0.001, and P=0.034, respectively) than those in group 2. We advocate for the adoption of the noninvasive SPGB method in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery. This approach significantly reduces the need for intraoperative analgesics, alleviates postoperative pain, and reduces the demand for postoperative analgesics. Moreover, it improves the overall surgical experience because of its ease of application, contributing to a more comfortable surgical process.

A survey-based, quasi-experimental study assessing a high-cannabidiol suppository for menstrual-related pain and discomfort

The endocannabinoid system is involved in gynecological functions, with cannabidiol (CBD) demonstrating promise for alleviating menstrual-related symptoms. This survey-based, quasi-experimental study assessed pro re nata (PRN) use of a commercially-available, hemp-derived, broad-spectrum, high-CBD (100 mg) vaginal suppository (Foria®) for menstrual-related pain and discomfort compared to a treatment-as-usual (TAU) group (CBD n = 77, TAU n = 230), with survey assessments collected at baseline and two monthly follow-ups (~2 menstrual cycles). The CBD group demonstrated significantly reduced frequency and severity of menstrual-related symptoms, impact of symptoms on daily functioning, need for analgesics, and number of analgesics used relative to the TAU group (ps ≤ 0.032). Correlation analyses indicated a potential dose-dependent response, with increased suppository use associated with greater reduction of symptoms (ps ≤ 0.025). Most CBD participants reported at least moderate improvement of symptoms (follow-up 1 = 72.9%, follow-up 2 = 81.1%). Future studies (including replication in randomized clinical trials) assessing pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, mechanism(s) of action, efficacy for other gynecological indications, and potential adverse events (e.g., drug-drug interactions) are indicated.

Effects of Music Therapy on Postoperative Pain Perception in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgeries Under General Anesthesia: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Comparative Clinical Study.

Background Music therapy has been shown to reduce the need for sedation and analgesics, as well as lower plasma cortisol and epinephrine levels in patients undergoing regional anesthesia. This study evaluates the efficacy of perioperative music therapy in reducing pain perception and its impact on cortisol levels. Materials and methods This prospective randomized control trial was conducted at the tertiary care center in Western Maharashtra. Sixty adult patients (males/females) undergoing elective lower abdomen surgery were included and randomized equally into two groups to listen to music using headphones at a preselected volume (Group M) or to use only headphones without any music played (Group C) for 2 hours in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. Demographic information, anthropometric (height, weight), and biochemical (serum cortisol) measurements were performed. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades 1 and 2, and patients aged 18 to 65 years were included. Pain perception was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results The demographic data, including mean age, BMI, ASA status, average duration of anesthesia, and average duration of surgery, were comparable between the two groups. Group M showed improved control of systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 10- and 30-minutepost-induction of general anesthesia and had a significantly lower VAS score (p < 0.05). Additionally, patient satisfaction was higher in Group M (81.4%) compared to Group C (51.4%) with a p-value of < 0.05. Intraoperative awareness was non-significant between the groups. Conclusion Music therapy is a safe, cost-effective, and efficacious method for reducing pain perception and can be used in conjunction with other treatments for postoperative pain management.

Effects of opioid-sparing general anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to either the opioid-using anesthesia (OUA) or the OSA groups. In the OUA group, remifentanil was administered as an opioid during general anesthesia. In the OSA group, apart from a single dose of 5 μg/kg of alfentanil for tracheal intubation, no other opioids were used. In both groups, a multimodal intravenous non-opioid analgesic regimen was used preferentially in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV, assessed by symptoms until the postoperative day (POD) 1. A total of 120 patients were included in this study. The incidence of nausea in the PACU was significantly lower in the OSA group compared to in the OUA group (31.7% in the OSA group vs. 51.7% in the OUA group, P = 0.026). Pain scores and the incidence of opioid analgesic administration were lower in the OSA group during PACU stay, resulting in a significantly lower number of patients requiring rescue opioid analgesics (3.3% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in intraoperative vital signs, hemodynamic interventions, or duration of PACU and hospital stay between the two groups. OSA significantly reduced postoperative nausea, pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesics in the PACU without increasing hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

Background: One-lung ventilation is used to improve surgical visualization and facilitate thoracoscopic manipulations; however, it induces ventilation/perfusion mismatch, exacerbating the inflammatory response that causes hypoxemia in the perioperative period. Opioid analgesics are the main analgesic drugs used during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), but their use is associated with adverse effects and higher risk of respiratory complications. Corrective measures to eliminate hypoxemia, reduce the inflammatory response, control pain, and minimize opioid-induced adverse effects are crucial in thoracic surgery.Objective: To study the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in reducing lung damage and postoperative complications after VATS.Materials and methods: We examined 100 patients who underwent lobectomy via a thoracoscopic approach. The patients were grouped based on anesthetic management: group 1 (n = 50) with intraoperative dexmedetomidine and group 2 (n = 50) without it. We determined the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and TNF and calculated PaO2/FiO2 and A-aDO2. We also assessed the postoperative pain intensity, need for trimeperidin promedol and tramadol, and incidence of postoperative complications.Results: During one-lung ventilation, patients from group 1 had higher PaO2/FiO2 values (P = .025). The A-aDO2 value was higher in group 2 (P = .006). After surgery, we found differences in the content of TNF and IL-8 (P &lt; .001). Twenty-four hours after surgery, we recorded a more significant prevalence of the studied cytokines in group 2 (P &lt; .001). There were no significant differences in the pain dynamics on the first postoperative day (P &gt; .05). Opioid analgesics were less needed in group 1 than in group 2 (P &lt; .001). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly.Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine in thoracic surgery improves the oxygenation and reduces the percentage of intrapulmonary shunting by inhibiting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In the postoperative period, dexmedetomidine reduces the need for opioid analgesics, but does not affect the pain level or incidence of complications.

Post-dural Puncture Headache: A Comparative Study Using 25 G Quincke's Needle in Midline and Paramedian Approaches in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section.

Background and objectives Spinal anesthesia (SA) has become a preferred anesthetic technique for elective cesarean sections due to its rapid onset, profound sensory and motor blockade, and minimal impact on the newborn. It lowers the risk of development of thrombus in the veins and pulmonary vessels and permits early ambulation. The most popular technique used to reach the subarachnoid space is the midline technique, though it can be challenging to use in some cases, including those involving elderly patients with degenerative abnormalities in the vertebral column, patients who are unable to flex the vertebral column, noncooperative patients, and hyperestheticpatients. The paramedian technique resolves the challenges posed by the midline technique. It is also relatively easy to carry out. Based on the midline technique's inadequacies, we hypothesized that the paramedian method of SA would be less complicated than the midline approach, with a relatively low occurrence of post-dural puncture headaches (PDPH). Methodology Using the midline and paramedian approaches during cesarean surgeries, we performed an observational descriptive longitudinal study to assess the occurrence and magnitude of PDPH. During an elective cesarean delivery, the seated patient received 2.0-2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine using the midline or paramedian approaches and a 25 G Quincke's needle at the L3-L4 level. Eighty-four pregnant females with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II, aged 18 to 35 (n = 42 in each group), were included in this research. The occurrence and severity of PDPH were compared among thegroups during a period of five days. Result In comparison to the paramedian group (7.1%), the midline group had a higher incidence of PDPH (14.3%). There was a significant correlation between the technique and the occurrence of PDPH (p = 0.041). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed to quantify pain five days after surgery. Pain levels in Group B (paramedian) were consistently less than those in Group A (midline). On day 1, Group B had a mean score of 0.49 ± 1.16 (p = 0.030) compared to Group A's mean VAS score of 1.27 ± 1.95. Day 5 (p = 0.032): Because this tendency persisted through day 5, the p-values for days 2, 3, 4, and 5 remained significant. These findings suggest that the midline technique is linked to a higher occurrence and magnitude of PDPHthan the paramedian approach. Conclusion Employing a paramedian technique has been associated with a noteworthy decline in the frequency of PDPH and a decrease in the need for additional analgesics, which could lead to a less severe case of PDPH. The paramedian approachneeded fewer attempts and needle passes, which leads to a lower incidence of headache, backache, and injection site pain and better patient satisfaction.