FTER four years of clinical experience A with mitral valve surgery the operative treatment is reported to be effective in relieving the symptoms and signs of pulmonary engorgement in from 50 to 80 per cent of the patients, with an over-all operative mortality of less than 15 per cent. tp4 The left auricular pressure may be lowered by enlarging the mitral valve orifice. 5 The postoperative improvement has been associated with a decrease in intensity of the diastolic murmur at the apex of the heart.6 Contrariwise, the absence of such changes, or the development of an apical systolic murmur of grade III intensity or greater, has been prognostic of a poor result.” The technic of venous catheterization of the heart and lungs has been employed to demonstrate a decrease in pulmonary arterial pressure and arteriolar resistance, together with a rise in cardiac output postoperatively. 7,8 Although patients often report improvement in exercise tolerance or functional working capacity,4 there has been no systematic study designed to quantitate either the degree or the rate of such improvement, and at the same time differentiate the effects of medical and surgical treatment of the heart disease. While there has been a tendency to urge operative treatment earlier in the natural history of mitral stenosis, a recent review indicated that “the mere presence of a mitral diastolic murmur without accompanying symptoms is not at this time sufficient reason to suggest surgery.“3 Hence there appears to be a need for an appropriate method of testing the severity of symptoms and disability in order to aid the clinical decision for or against surgery at any particular time in the course of mitral stenosis and its complications. Furthermore, since most of the operative mortality is associated with far advanced mitral heart disease, it would be helpful to know the minimal cardiac reserve that may be needed to withstand surgery. In an earlier report a treadmill exercise tolerance test was proposed to meet the clinical need for quantitative data on the physiologic responses to ordinary types of exercise.g The stress was standardized with respect to the speed and grade of walking, and limited in duration by motivation of the patient, the intensity of symptoms or, more arbitrarily, to ten minutes’ time. In the vast majority of patients tested motivation was appropriate and poor results were not due to this factor alone. The stress was proportional to body weight of each patient and represented a threefold increase in the oxygen requirement over the resting level. The test was sufficiently long to observe the optimal adaptations of re:piration and circulation to meet these requirements. Salient responses to exercise could be expressed quantitatively in terms of a ratio designated the “physical fitness index” (PFI). The PFI was derived from the duration of exercise, the average exercise respiratory efficiency (the difference in volumes per cent between the