Nationwide Readmissions Database Research Articles

Association of Obesity Based on Different Metabolic Status with Risk of Gout Occurrence in Patients: A National Study.

Obesity often co-exists with metabolic abnormalities, but the results of studies on the relationship between obesity, metabolic abnormalities and the risk of gout are inconsistent. We aimed to study whether there was a mutual regulation between obesity, metabolic abnormalities and the risk of gout. We conducted a cross-sectional study to expound the association between obesity based on different metabolic statuses and the risk of gout. Patients were derived from Nationwide Readmission Database (2018 sample). A total of 9,668,330 records were recruited for analysis from January to December. The risk of gout in the obesity group, metabolic abnormalities group and obesity combined with metabolic abnormalities group was 1.67 times (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.64-1.70), 3.12 times (OR=3.12, 95%CI 3.09-3.15) and 4.27 times (OR=4.27, 95%CI 4.22-4.32) higher than that in the normal control group. For different metabolic components, OR value was highest in hypertension group (OR=2.65, 95%CI 2.60-2.70 and OR=4.85, 95%CI 4.73-4.97), followed by dyslipidemia group (OR=2.23, 95%CI 2.16-2.30 and OR=3.74, 95%CI 3.55-3.95) and in hyperglycemia group (OR=1.73, 95%CI 1.66-1.80 and OR=2.94, 95%CI 2.78-3.11). Fewer components of metabolic syndrome were associated with a lower risk of gout in both nonobese and obese patients. When metabolic abnormalities were present, obesity induced a higher risk of gout. Different components of metabolic abnormalities had different effects on the risk of gout occurrence, and the number of metabolic abnormalities was closely related to the risk of gout occurrence. Follow-up and intervention methods targeting obesity and metabolic abnormalities should be considered for patients with gout.

Readmissions After Traumatic Brain Injury in the Nationwide Readmissions Database

IntroductionReadmissions after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) can have severe impacts on long-term health outcomes as well as rehabilitation. The aim of this descriptive study was to analyze the Nationwide Readmissions Database to determine possible risk factors associated with readmission for patients who previously sustained a TBI. MethodsThis retrospective study used data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database to explore gender, age, injury severity score, comorbidities, index admission hospital size, discharge disposition of the patient, and cause for readmission for adults admitted with a TBI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess likelihood of readmission. ResultsThere was a readmission rate of 28.7% (n = 31,757) among the study population. The primary cause of readmission was either subsequent injury or sequelae of the original injury (n = 8825; 29%) followed by circulatory (n = 5894; 19%) and nervous system issues (n = 2904; 9%). There was a significantly higher risk of being readmitted in males (Female odds ratio: 0.87; confidence interval [0.851-0.922), older patients (65-79: 32.3%; > 80: 37.1%), patients with three or more comorbidities (≥ 3: 32.9%), or in patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility/intermediate care facility/rehab (SNF/ICF/Rehab odds ratio: 1.55; confidence interval [0.234-0.262]). ConclusionsThis study demonstrates a large proportion of patients are readmitted after sustaining a TBI. A significant number of patients are readmitted for subsequent injuries, circulatory issues, nervous system problems, and infections. Although readmissions cannot be completely avoided, defining at-risk populations is the first step of understanding how to reduce readmissions.

Mortality and resource utilization in surgical versus transcatheter repeat mitral valve replacement: A national analysis.

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has garnered interest as a viable alternative to the traditional surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) for high-risk patients requiring redo operations. This study aims to evaluate the association of TMVR with selected clinical and financial outcomes. Adults undergoing isolated redo mitral valve replacement were identified in the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database and categorized into TMVR or SMVR cohorts. Various regression models were developed to assess the association between TMVR and in-hospital mortality, as well as additional secondary outcomes. Transseptal and transapical catheter-based approaches were also compared in relation to study endpoints. Of an estimated 7,725 patients, 2,941 (38.1%) underwent TMVR. During the study period, the proportion of TMVR for redo operations increased from 17.8% to 46.7% (nptrend<0.001). Following adjustment, TMVR was associated with similar odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.82, p = 0.48), but lower odds of stroke (AOR 0.44, p = 0.001), prolonged ventilation (AOR 0.43, p<0.001), acute kidney injury (AOR 0.61, p<0.001), and reoperation (AOR 0.29, p = 0.02). TMVR was additionally correlated with shorter postoperative length of stay (pLOS; β -0.98, p<0.001) and reduced costs (β -$10,100, p = 0.002). Additional analysis demonstrated that the transseptal approach had lower adjusted mortality (AOR 0.44, p = 0.02), shorter adjusted pLOS (β -0.43, p<0.001), but higher overall costs (β $5,200, p = 0.04), compared to transapical. In this retrospective cohort study, we noted TMVR to yield similar odds of in-hospital mortality as SMVR, but fewer complications and reduced healthcare expenditures. Moreover, transseptal approaches were associated with lower adjusted mortality, shorter pLOS, but higher cost, relative to the transapical. Our findings suggest that TMVR represent a cost-effective and safe treatment modality for patients requiring redo mitral valve procedures. Nevertheless, future studies examining long-term outcomes associated with SMVR and TMVR in redo mitral valve operations, are needed.

Resilience and Value: Pediatric Trauma Care in Safety Net Hospitals.

Background: In the setting of limited funding and high expectations for quality care, safety net hospitals play a crucial role in treating pediatric trauma patients. This study aimed to compare outcomes and hospitalization costs of pediatric trauma patients in safety net hospitals across the United States. Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database for 2016-2020 was queried for all patients under the age of 18years hospitalized for traumatic injury. Patients admitted to safety net hospitals were propensity matched 1:1 to all other patients. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcomes were readmission within 1-year, mean length of stay (LOS), total charges, and total hospitalization costs including readmissions. Results: There were 176,325 patients meeting inclusion criteria, and 30,869 were admitted to safety net hospitals. All safety net patients were successfully matched across predictors, and 61,738 patients were included. The overall mortality rate was 1.4% (n = 834), and the mortality risk was similar in safety net hospitals (OR 1.11 [.96-1.27] P = .15). The overall readmission rate, mean LOS, and mean total cost were similar for safety net hospitals when compared to all hospitals. However, the overall mean total charge was $78,724 (±$224,884) and was lower in safety net hospitals ($76,575 [±$198,342], P = .02). Discussion: Safety net hospitals deliver comparable outcomes as other health care facilities when caring for pediatric trauma patients. Notably, these hospitals appear to undercharge for their services, despite incurring similar costs in the process. These results shed light on the resilience of safety net hospitals in delivering quality and cost-effective care.

Association of Safety-Net Hospital Status With Outcomes Following Head and Neck Cancer Operations.

To assess perioperative and readmission outcomes of patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNCA) surgery at safety-net hospitals (SNHs) in a modern cohort. Retrospective cohort study. Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), 2010 to 2019. All elective adult (≥18 years) admissions involving HNCA resection were identified from the NRD. To calculate safety-net burden, the proportion of Medicaid or uninsured patients admitted to each hospital for any indication was tabulated annually, with centers in the highest quartile defined as SNHs. To perform risk adjustment in assessing perioperative and readmission outcomes, multivariable regression models were developed. Of an estimated 133,018 head and neck surgical patients, 26.5% (n = 35,268) received treatment at a SNH. Utilization of SNHs increased over the decade-long study period, with 29.8% of individuals treated at these sites in 2019. After multivariable adjustment, several patient factors were noted to be associated with SNHs, including younger age, lower comorbidity burden, and income within the lowest quartile. Although incidence of adverse events decreased at both SNHs and non-SNHs during the study period, treatment at SNHs remained associated with these events after risk adjustment (adjusted odds ratio: 1.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.28, P < .001). SNHs continue to provide valuable specialty care to underserved populations, often with limited financial resources. Despite promising results from prior decades demonstrating comparable perioperative outcomes, the present study noted increased adverse events following HNCA surgery at these sites. Such findings underscore the need for continued advocacy to secure necessary funding for these centers.

Myocardial Infarction in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results from Nationwide Readmission Database.

Background and Objective Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematological malignancy with an excellent prognostic outcome. After advancements in CML treatment and the introduction of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), the life expectancy of CML patients has become equivalent to that of the general population. As a result, coronary artery disease is anticipated to be the leading cause of death among CML patients. Moreover, TKI use is associated with a risk of endothelial dysfunction, thrombosis, and cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction. In this study, we compare the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with CML to their matched non-CML counterparts. and compare the events reported with different TKI. Method The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was searched from January 2016 to December 2020. for the study population. Adults of age ≥ 18 years with or without CML hospitalized for with a primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and underwent PCI were included. The patients were identified using ICD-10 codes. The baseline characteristics and outcomes of the CML and non-CML patients who underwent PCI were compared. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates. The secondary outcomes were the PCI complications rates. Data regarding TKI reports of STEMI and acute coronary syndrome were obtained from The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FARES). Results Out of 2,727,619 patients with myocardial infarction, 2,124 CML patients were identified. A total of 888 CML patients underwent PCI. The mean age was 68.34 ± 11.14, with 62.46 % above 65 years. The analysis showed no significant difference between CML and non-CML patients after PCI for death (OR? 0.93 (95% CI 0.49-1.80), P=0.527) and 30-day readmission (OR? 1.41 (95% CI 0.99-2.01), P=0.056) rates. CML patients were significantly older (mean age 68.34 ± 11.14 versus 64.40 ± 12.61, p &lt; 0.001) than non-CML patients without a difference in sex distribution. Hypertension (85.45% versus 78.64%), diabetes (45.48% versus 37.29), stroke (11.84% versus 7.78) at baseline were significantly higher in CML group. Prior myocardial infarction events (20.51% versus 15.17%) and prior PCI procedure (24.47% versus 16.89%) were significantly higher in CML group. CML had a significantly longer hospital stay (4.66 ± 4.40 versus 3.75 ± 4.62 days, p = 0.001). The primary outcomes did not differ between the comparison groups. Conclusion This analysis showed no statistically significant difference in mortality, 30-day readmission, and complication rates post PCI between CML and non-CML patients. However, interestingly, CML patients may experience lower coronary artery dissection and ischemic stroke rates than those without CML diagnosis.

Impact of Cirrhosis Etiology on the Risk for Venous Thromboembolism.

Cirrhosis is associated with an increased risk for both bleeding and venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications. The data regarding the impact of etiology of cirrhosis on VTE risk is poorly understood. In this retrospective observational analysis of the US Nationwide readmissions database 2019, we identified hospitalized patients who had cirrhosis from alcohol, viral, or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) etiologies. We identified patients who had acute VTE, chronic/history of VTE, and portal venous thrombosis (PVT). Overall VTE risk was defined as the composite of acute and chronic VTE or PVT. The impact of etiology of cirrhosis on the crude and risk adjusted rates of VTE and PVT was studied. Of 432,383 patients with cirrhosis, 41.4% patients had NASH-cirrhosis, 39.7% had alcohol-related cirrhosis, and 18.9% had viral cirrhosis. The overall VTE rate was highest in patients with NASH cirrhosis (10.8%) followed by viral cirrhosis (9.7%) and alcohol-related cirrhosis (7.5%; P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for acute and chronic VTE. After risk adjustment, patients with NASH (OR 1.48 95% CI 1.42-1.54) and viral cirrhosis (OR 1.22 95% CI 1.17-1.29) had significantly higher overall VTE risk compared with alcohol-related cirrhosis. When separately evaluated, the adjusted risk for acute and chronic VTE was similar between patients with alcohol-related and viral cirrhosis but higher with NASH cirrhosis. PVT rate was highest with viral cirrhosis (4.3%) followed by NASH (2.8%) and alcohol-related cirrhosis (2.4%; P < 0.001). The adjusted risk of PVT was higher with viral (OR 1.61 95% CI 1.50-1.72) and NASH cirrhosis (OR 1.41 95% CI 1.31-1.52). NASH cirrhosis was associated with a higher VTE risk compared with alcohol-related and viral etiologies. As NASH cirrhosis increases in prevalence as the major etiology of cirrhosis, it is important to understand the increased VTE risk associated with this condition to improve management strategies and patient outcomes.

Abstract PO4-23-03: The Influence of Reconstruction Type on Outcomes in Women Undergoing Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction: A Nationwide Study

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Outcomes after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction may vary depending on the type of reconstruction, but the evidence is limited and inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to compare the most common reconstruction techniques in a large national cohort of women undergoing these procedures. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database for 2016-2020 was queried for all women aged 18 years or older undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction. The primary outcome was prolonged length of stay (LOS) greater than 7 days. The secondary outcomes were readmission within 30 days and readmission to a different hospital. The types of reconstruction were compared along with all other relevant variables from the database. Univariable comparison was performed using chi-squared tests for each outcome. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using all significant confounders. RESULTS: During the study period, 35,430 patients were identified undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction. The rate of prolonged (LOS) was 2.4% (n= 840) and the readmission rate was 5.4% (n=1,919). From the readmitted patients, the rate of readmission to a different hospital was 14.2% (n=273). Controlling for confounders with multivariable logistic regression revealed the strongest risk factors for prolonged LOS were latissimus dorsi flap (OR 5.4 [4.0-7.4] p&amp;lt; 0.001) and an investor-owned hospital (OR 4.3 [3.5-5.2] p&amp;lt; 0.001). The highest risk of readmission was a transverse rectus abdominis flap (OR 1.3 [1.1-1.6] p&amp;lt; 0.001) and the highest risk of readmission to a different hospital was a small hospital (OR 2.2 [1.6-3.1] p&amp;lt; 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reconstruction type influences outcomes in women undergoing mastectomy. These outcomes have significant implications for surgical decision-making and fragmentation of care. Further research to identify ways to reduce adverse outcomes and improve patient satisfaction is warranted. Citation Format: Lucia Castro Hernandez, Joshua Parreco. The Influence of Reconstruction Type on Outcomes in Women Undergoing Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction: A Nationwide Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-23-03.

Association of carotid endarterectomy at low-volume centers with higher likelihood of major complications and nonroutine discharge.

Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is associated with an annual stroke risk of 2%-5%, and revascularization with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can reduce this risk. While studies have demonstrated that hospital CEA volume is associated with mortality and myocardial infarction, CEA volume cutoffs in studies are relatively arbitrary, and no specific analyses on broad complications and discharge disposition have been performed. In this study, the authors systematically set out to identify a cutoff at which CEA procedural volume was significantly associated with major complications and nonroutine discharge. Asymptomatic and symptomatic CAS patients undergoing CEA were retrospectively identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2010-2018). The association of CEA volume with outcomes was explored as a continuous variable using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing. The identified volume cutoff was used to generate dichotomous volume cohorts, and multivariate analyses of patient and hospital characteristics were conducted to evaluate the association of CEA volume with major complications and discharge disposition. Between 2010 and 2018, 308,933 asymptomatic and 32,877 symptomatic patients underwent CEA. Analysis of CEA volume with outcomes as a continuous variable demonstrated that an increase in volume was associated with a lower risk until a volume of approximately 7 cases per year (20th percentile). A total of 6702 (2.2%) asymptomatic and 1040 (3.2%) symptomatic patients were treated at the bottom 20% of hospital procedure volume. Increased rates of complications were seen at low-volume centers among asymptomatic (3.66% vs 2.77%) and symptomatic (7.4% vs 6.87%) patients. Asymptomatic patients treated at low-volume centers had an increased likelihood of major complications (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.49; p = 0.007) and nonroutine discharge (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.24-1.50; p < 0.0001). Symptomatic patients treated at low-volume centers were also more likely to experience major complications (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.02; p = 0.02) and nonroutine discharge (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.47; p = 0.005). Mortality rates were similar between low- and high-volume hospitals among asymptomatic (0.36% and 0.32%, respectively) and symptomatic (1.06% and 1.49%, respectively) patients, while volume was not significantly associated with mortality among asymptomatic (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.67-1.65; p = 0.81) and symptomatic (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.43-1.54; p = 0.52) patients in multivariate analysis. CEA patients, asymptomatic or symptomatic, are at a higher risk of major complications and nonroutine discharge at low-volume centers. Analysis of CEA as a continuous variable demonstrated a cutoff at 7 cases per year, and further study may identify factors associated with improved outcome at the lowest-volume centers.

Rates of Cesarean Delivery and Neurologic Complications in Parturients With Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts [ID 2683661

INTRODUCTION: The effect of parturition on neurologic status in CSF shunt-dependent patients is poorly understood. Cesarean delivery has been proposed as a safer alternative to labor in this population based on limited case reports and retrospective data in the literature; however, the true risk of vaginal delivery has not been adequately described. To our knowledge, this is the first study to estimate national incidence of neurologic complications based on delivery mode in shunt-dependent parturients. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried for obstetric patients undergoing delivery between 2016 and 2018. ICD-10 codes were used to identify delivery mode, preexisting CSF shunt-dependence, obstetric comorbidities, and neurologic complications. Data were weighted per NRD specifications. RESULTS: Of 11,021,188 total deliveries, 1,856 were in shunt-dependent patients. The primary cesarean rate was 41.2% (n=613) versus 20.1% (n=1,823,517) for shunted and non-shunted parturients, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that presence of a shunt independently predicted cesarean delivery (OR 2.4; CI, 2.0–2.9). Intrapartum shunt complication rates were low regardless of delivery mode (vaginal:0.5%, cesarean:0.5%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in rates of brain herniation (P=.82) or CNS infection (P=.15). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in neurologic complication rates between CSF shunt-dependent patients undergoing cesarean and vaginal delivery; however, cesarean delivery is performed at more than twice the rate of the general population. CSF-shunt dependence alone may not be an independent indication for cesarean delivery in the absence of other obstetric indications.

Clinical and financial outcomes associated with the utilization of right internal mammary artery versus radial artery in multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting

BackgroundMulti-arterial coronary bypass grafting with the left internal mammary artery as a conduit has been shown to offer superior long-term survival compared to single-arterial coronary bypass grafting. Nevertheless, the selection of a secondary conduit between the right internal mammary artery and the radial artery remains controversial. Using a national cohort, we examined the relationships between the right internal mammary artery and the radial artery with acute clinical and financial outcomes. MethodsAdults undergoing on-pump multivessel coronary bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery as the first arterial conduit were identified in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients receiving either the right internal mammary artery or the radial artery, but not both, were included in the analysis. Multivariable regression models were fitted to examine the association between the conduits and in-hospital mortality, as well as additional secondary outcomes. ResultsOf an estimated 49,798 patients undergoing multi-arterial coronary bypass grafting, 29,729 (59.7%) comprised the radial artery cohort. During the study period, the proportion of multi-arterial coronary bypass grafting utilizing the radial artery increased from 51.3% to 65.2% (nptrend <0.001). Following adjustment, the radial artery was associated with reduced odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.44), prolonged mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio 0.78), infectious complications (adjusted odds ratio 0.69), and 30-day nonelective readmission (adjusted odds ratio 0.77, all P < .05). ConclusionDespite no definite endorsement from surgical societies, the radial artery is increasingly utilized as a secondary conduit in multi-arterial coronary bypass grafting. Compared to the right internal mammary artery, the radial artery was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality, complications, and reduced healthcare expenditures. These results suggest that whenever feasible, the radial artery should be the favored conduit over the right internal mammary artery. Nevertheless, future studies examining long-term outcomes associated with these vessels remain necessary.

Association of severe obesity with risk of conversion to open in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

BackgroundObesity is a known risk factor for cholecystitis and is associated with technical complications during laparoscopic procedures. The present study seeks to assess the association between obesity class and conversion to open (CTO) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsAdult acute cholecystitis patients with obesity undergoing non-elective LC were identified in the 2017–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified by obesity class; class 1 (Body Mass Index [BMI] = 30.0–34.9), class 2 (BMI = 35.0–39.9), and class 3 (BMI ≥ 40.0). Multivariable regression models were developed to assess factors associated with CTO and its association with perioperative complications and resource utilization. ResultsOf 89,476 patients undergoing LC, 40.6 % had BMI ≥ 40.0. Before adjustment, class 3 obesity was associated with increased rates of CTO compared to class 1–2 (4.6 vs 3.8 %; p < 0.001). Following adjustment, class 3 remained associated with an increased likelihood of CTO (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.45, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 1.31–1.61; ref.: class 1–2). Patients undergoing CTO had increased risk of blood transfusion (AOR 3.27, 95 % CI 2.54–4.22) and respiratory complications (AOR 1.36, 95 % CI 1.01–1.85). Finally, CTO was associated with incremental increases in hospitalization costs (β + $719, 95 % CI 538–899) and length of stay (LOS; β +2.20 days, 95 % CI 2.05–2.34). ConclusionsClass 3 obesity is a significant risk factor for CTO. Moreover, CTO is associated with increased hospitalization costs and LOS. As the prevalence of obesity grows, improved understanding of operative risk by approach is required to optimize clinical outcomes. Our findings are relevant to shared decision-making and informed consent.

D-15 | Catheter-Directed Interventions for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Cirrhotics vs Non-cirrhotics- Nationwide Readmission Database Analysis

D-15 | Catheter-Directed Interventions for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Cirrhotics vs Non-cirrhotics- Nationwide Readmission Database Analysis

Demystifying the association of center-level operative trauma volume and outcomes of emergency general surgery

BackgroundRecent studies have demonstrated a positive volume-outcome relationship in emergency general surgery. Some have advocated for the sub-specialization of emergency general surgery independent from trauma. We hypothesized inferior clinical outcomes of emergency general surgery with increasing center-level operative trauma volume, potentially attributable to overall hospital quality. MethodsAdults (≥18 years) undergoing complex emergency general surgery operations (large and small bowel resection, repair of perforated peptic ulcer, lysis of adhesions, laparotomy) were identified in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multivariable risk-adjusted models were developed to evaluate the association of treatment at a high-volume trauma center (reference: low-volume trauma center) with clinical and financial outcomes after emergency general surgery. To evaluate hospital quality, mortality among adult hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction was assessed by hospital trauma volume. ResultsOf an estimated 785,793 patients undergoing a complex emergency general surgery operation, 223,116 (28.4%) were treated at a high-volume trauma center. Treatment at a high-volume trauma center was linked to 1.19 odds of in-hospital mortality (95% confidence interval 1.12–1.27). Although emergency general surgery volume was associated with decreasing predicted risk of mortality, increasing trauma volume was linked to an incremental rise in the odds of mortality after emergency general surgery. Secondary analysis revealed increased mortality for admissions for acute myocardial infarction with greater trauma volume. ConclusionWe note increased mortality for emergency general surgery and acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving treatment at high-volume trauma centers, signifying underlying structural factors to broadly affect quality. Thus, decoupling trauma and emergency general surgery services may not meaningfully improve outcomes for emergency general surgery patients. Our findings have implications for the evolving specialty of emergency general surgery, especially for the safety and continued growth of the acute care surgery model.

Machine learning prediction of hospitalization costs for coronary artery bypass grafting operations

BackgroundWith the steady rise in health care expenditures, the examination of factors that may influence the costs of care has garnered much attention. Although machine learning models have previously been applied in health economics, their application within cardiac surgery remains limited. We evaluated several machine learning algorithms to model hospitalization costs for coronary artery bypass grafting. MethodsAll adult hospitalizations for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were identified in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Machine learning models were trained to predict expenditures and compared with traditional linear regression. Given the significance of postoperative length of stay, we additionally developed models excluding postoperative length of stay to uncover other drivers of costs. To facilitate comparison, machine learning classification models were also trained to predict patients in the highest decile of costs. Significant factors associated with high cost were identified using SHapley Additive exPlanations beeswarm plots. ResultsAmong 444,740 hospitalizations included for analysis, the median cost of hospitalization in coronary artery bypass grafting patients was $43,103. eXtreme Gradient Boosting most accurately predicted hospitalization costs, with R2 = 0.519 over the validation set. The top predictive features in the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model included elective procedure status, prolonged mechanical ventilation, new-onset respiratory failure or myocardial infarction, and postoperative length of stay. After removing postoperative length of stay, eXtreme Gradient Boosting remained the most accurate model (R2 = 0.38). Prolonged ventilation, respiratory failure, and elective status remained important predictive parameters. ConclusionMachine learning models appear to accurately model total hospitalization costs for coronary artery bypass grafting. Future work is warranted to uncover other drivers of costs and improve the value of care in cardiac surgery.

C-43 | Causes and Predictors of 30 Days Readmission After Revascularization For Chronic Total Occlusion in Patients With History of Ventricular Tachycardia: Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis.

C-43 | Causes and Predictors of 30 Days Readmission After Revascularization For Chronic Total Occlusion in Patients With History of Ventricular Tachycardia: Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis.

Association of socioeconomic vulnerability with outcomes after emergency general surgery

PurposeSocial determinants of health are increasingly recognized to shape health outcomes. Yet, the effect of socioeconomic vulnerability on outcomes after emergency general surgery remains under-studied. MethodsAll adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for emergency general surgery operations (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, laparotomy, large bowel resection, perforated ulcer repair, or small bowel resection), within 2 days of non-elective admission were tabulated in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Socioeconomic vulnerability was defined using relevant diagnosis codes and comprised economic, educational, healthcare, environmental, and social needs. Patients demonstrating socioeconomic vulnerability were considered Vulnerable (others: Non-Vulnerable). Multivariable models were constructed to evaluate the independent associations between socioeconomic vulnerability and key outcomes. ResultsOf ∼1,788,942 patients, 177,764 (9.9%) were considered Vulnerable. Compared to Non-Vulnerable, Vulnerable patients were older (67 [55–77] vs 58 years [41–70), P < .001), more often insured by Medicaid (16.4 vs 12.7%, P < .001), and had a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (4 [3–5] vs 2 [1–3], P < .001). After risk adjustment and with Non-Vulnerable as a reference, Vulnerable remained linked with a greater likelihood of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.64, confidence interval 1.58–1.70) and any perioperative complication (adjusted odds ratio 2.02, confidence interval 1.98–2.06). Vulnerable also experienced a greater duration of stay (β+4.64 days, confidence interval +4.54–4.74) and hospitalization costs (β+$1,360, confidence interval +980–1,740). Further, the Vulnerable cohort demonstrated increased odds of non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 2.44, confidence interval 2.38–2.50) and non-elective readmission within 30 days of discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.29, confidence interval 1.26–1.32). ConclusionSocioeconomic vulnerability is independently associated with greater morbidity, resource use, and readmission after emergency general surgery. Novel interventions are needed to build hospital screening and care pathways to improve disparities in outcomes.

Predictors and Outcomes of Expedited Postpartum Discharge in a National Sample [ID 2683489

INTRODUCTION: Expedited postpartum discharge (EPD), defined as less than 2 days and less than 3 days after vaginal and cesarean birth, respectively, has been postulated as a measure to improve hospital utilization. National trends regarding outcomes after EPD are lacking. This study aims to characterize national trends in EPD, identify predictors, and assess safety using 60-day postpartum readmission as a surrogate marker. METHODS: Birth hospitalizations and readmissions were extracted from the 2016–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Postpartum length of stay (ppLOS) was calculated and categorized as routine, expedited, and prolonged. Annual EPD and readmission prevalence were calculated. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were fit to assess predictors of EPD and the association between EPD and readmission, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and obstetric outcomes. RESULTS: Of 17.3 million birth hospitalizations, 33% experienced EPD. Expedited postpartum discharge prevalence increased from 29.6% to 44.4% with a higher proportion of EPD in 2020 compared to 2016–2019 (P&lt;.01). Younger and older age, chronic conditions, and obstetric complications were associated with lower likelihood of EPD. The overall 60-day readmission rate after delivery hospitalization discharge was 1.4%, and when stratified by expedited, routine, and prolonged ppLOS were 1.4%, 1.6%, and 3.3%, respectively, with no change in readmission rate during the study period. Hospitalizations with expedited discharge were 14% less likely to be readmitted 60 days after discharge compared to hospitalizations with routine discharge (aOR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.88). CONCLUSION: Nationwide rates of EPD increased during the study period with no corresponding increase in 60-day readmission rates, suggesting that EPD may be utilized more widely in appropriate-risk patients.

Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndrome

Previous studies have shown an association between acute limb ischemia and higher mortality in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Although Peripheral Artery Disease is a well-known risk factor for development of macrovascular pathology, the effect of its severity is not well investigated in patients hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Using a national cohort of patients with various degrees of Peripheral Arterial Disease, we investigated in-hospital outcomes in patients who were admitted for ACS. Using the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database, we queried all patients who were hospitalized for ACS (Unstable Angina, Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, and ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). Patients were further divided into three groups, either No Peripheral Arterial Disease (Non-PAD), Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) or Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI). Multivariable models were designed to adjust for patient and hospital factors and examine the association between ACS and PAD severity. Of an approximately 3,834,181 hospitalizations for ACS, 6.4% had PAD, 0.2% had CLI and all other were Non-PAD. Following risk adjustment, in hospital mortality was higher by 24% in PAD (AOR 1.24, 95%CI 1.21-1.28) and 86% in CLI (AOR 1.86, 95%CI 1.62-2.09) compared to Non-PAD. Furthermore, PAD and CLI were linked to 1.23-fold (95%CI 1.20-1.26) and 1.67-fold (95%CI 1.45-1.86) greater odds of cardiogenic shock compared to Non-PAD. Additionally, PAD and CLI were linked with higher odds of mechanical circulatory support usage, cardiac arrest and acute kidney injury compared to Non-PAD. Lastly, duration of hospital stay, hospitalization costs and odds of non-home discharge and 30-day readmissions were greater in patients with PAD and CLI compared to Non-PAD. PAD severity was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with ACS, including in hospital mortality and resource utilization.

Hospital Quality Mediates Impact of Care Fragmentation Following Elective Colectomy.

Readmission at a non-index hospital, or care fragmentation (CF), has been previously linked to greater morbidity and resource utilization. However, a contemporary evaluation of the impact of CF on readmission outcomes following elective colectomy is lacking. We additionally sought to evaluate the role of hospital quality in mediating the effect of CF. All records for adults undergoing elective colectomy were tabulated from the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients readmitted non-electively within 30days to a non-index center comprised the CF cohort (others: Non-CF). Hierarchical mixed-effects models were constructed to ascertain risk-adjusted rates of major adverse events (MAEs, a composite of in-hospital mortality and any complication) attributable to center-level effects. Hospitals with risk-adjusted MAE rates ≥50th percentile were considered Low-Quality Hospitals (LQHs) (others: High-Quality Hospitals [HQHs]). Of 68,185 patients readmitted non-electively within 30days, 8968 (13.2%) were categorized as CF. On average, CF was older, of greater comorbidity burden, and more often underwent colectomy for cancer, relative to Non-CF. Following risk adjustment, CF remained independently associated with greater likelihood of MAE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.16, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.05-1.27) and per-patient expenditures (β+$2,280, CI +$1080-3490). Further, readmission to non-index LQH was linked with significantly increased odds of MAE, following initial care at HQH (AOR 1.43, CI 1.03-1.99) and LQH (AOR 1.72, CI 1.30-2.28; Reference: Non-CF). Care fragmentation was associated with greater morbidity and resource utilization at readmission following elective colectomy. Further, rehospitalization at non-index LQH conferred significantly inferior outcomes. Novel efforts are needed to improve continuity of care.