National Plan For Rare Diseases Research Articles

Rare diseases research and policy in Australia: On the journey to equitable care.

Almost exactly 10 years after the publication of 'Call for a national plan for rare diseases' in this journal, the Federal Government launched the National Strategic Action Plan for Rare Diseases (the Action Plan) on the 26th of February 2020, in the lead up to Rare Disease Day on the 29th of February - a rare day for rare diseases. The Action Plan is the culmination of effective advocacy by Rare Voices Australia (RVA) and other stakeholders in the rare disease (RD) sector. RVA is the peak body for Australians living with a RD. The organisation works collaboratively with RD organisations, researchers and clinicians. Since the initial call for a RD plan, a number of health-care initiatives and policy changes have gathered apace including expanded antenatal and newborn screening, the increasing application of next generation sequencing and advances in gene and cell therapeutics. The development of new models of care, diagnostic and treatment pathways, and communities of practice have started to ease the considerable burden and inequitable access to care experienced by RD patients and their families. However, much work remains to be done. The Action Plan outlines the actions to bring about the best possible health and well-being outcomes for Australians living with RD. It is centred around three pillars - awareness and education, care and support, research and data - and will be delivered against the principles of person centredness, equity, and sustainable systems and workforce.

The need for widely available genomic testing in rare eye diseases: an ERN-EYE position statement

BackgroundRare Eye Diseases (RED) are the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness for children and young adults in Europe. This heterogeneous group of conditions includes over 900 disorders ranging from relatively prevalent disorders such as retinitis pigmentosa to very rare entities such as developmental eye anomalies. A significant number of patients with RED have an underlying genetic etiology. One of the aims of the European Reference Network for Rare Eye Diseases (ERN–EYE) is to facilitate improvement in diagnosis of RED in European member states.Main bodyTechnological advances have allowed genetic and genomic testing for RED. The outcome of genetic testing allows better understanding of the condition and allows reproductive and therapeutic options. The increase of the number of clinical trials for RED has provided urgency for genetic testing in RED. A survey of countries participating in ERN-EYE demonstrated that the majority are able to access some forms of genomic testing. However, there is significant variability, particularly regarding testing as part of clinical service. Some countries have a well-delineated rare disease pathway and have a national plan for rare diseases combined or not with a national plan for genomics in medicine. In other countries, there is a well-established organization of genetic centres that offer reimbursed genomic testing of RED and other rare diseases. Clinicians often rely upon research-funded laboratories or private companies. Notably, some member states rely on cross-border testing by way of an academic research project. Consequently, many clinicians are either unable to access testing or are confronted with long turnaround times. Overall, while the cost of sequencing has dropped, the cumulative cost of a genomic testing service for populations remains considerable. Importantly, the majority of countries reported healthcare budgets that limit testing.Short conclusionDespite technological advances, critical gaps in genomic testing remain in Europe, especially in smaller countries where no formal genomic testing pathways exist. Even within larger countries, the existing arrangements are insufficient to meet the demand and to ensure access. ERN-EYE promotes access to genetic testing in RED and emphasizes the clinical need and relevance of genetic testing in RED.

Neurofibromatosis 1 French national guidelines based on an extensive literature review since 1966

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a relatively common genetic disease, with a prevalence ranging between 1/3000 and 1/6000 people worldwide. The disease affects multiple systems with cutaneous, neurologic, and orthopedic as major manifestations which lead to significant morbidity or mortality. Indeed, NF1 patients are at an increased risk of malignancy and have a life expectancy about 10–15 years shorter than the general population. The mainstay of management of NF1 is a patient-centered longitudinal care with age-specific monitoring of clinical manifestations, aiming at the early recognition and symptomatic treatment of complications as they occur. Protocole national de diagnostic et de soins (PNDS) are mandatory French clinical practice guidelines for rare diseases required by the French national plan for rare diseases. Their purpose is to provide health care professionals with guidance regarding the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients affected with a rare disease; and thus, harmonizing their management nationwide. PNDS are usually developed through a critical literature review and a multidisciplinary expert consensus. The purpose of this article is to present the French guidelines on NF1, making them even more available to the international medical community. We further dwelled on the emerging new evidence that might have therapeutic potential or a strong impact on NF1 management in the coming feature. Given the complexity of the disease, the management of children and adults with NF1 entails the full complement healthcare providers and communication among the various specialties.

P.396The DM-Scope registry: an innovative framework for myotonic dystrophy translational resarch

The relevance of registries as a key component for developing clinical research for rare diseases (RD) has been acknowledged by most stakeholders. However, remaining limitations have been pointed out. We developed the innovative concept of the DM-Scope registry aiming to promote translational research and care management for myotonic dystrophy (DM), a prototypical example of highly heterogeneous RD. Study objectives were (1) to improve data quality and value; (2) to limit the amount of incomplete data; (3) to improve standardization and data comparability. The latter step was addressed by implementing the plateform to Canada, as a proof of concept of transnational collaborative operability. The revised dataset includes social-demographic data, clinical features, genotype, and biomaterial data, and is adjustable for clinical trial data collection. In France, the registry has a nationwide coverage, composed of 55 neuromuscular centres, certified by National plan for RDs, encompassing the whole disease clinical and genetic spectrum. This widely used platform gathers almost 3000 DM patients (DM1 n=2828, DM2 n=142), in both paediatric (n=322) and adults (n=2648) centres, which accounts for >20% of overall registered DM patients internationally. The registry supported 10 research studies of various type i.e. observational and basic science and interventional studies, and dramatically accelerated patient recruitment for clinical trials. The DM-Scope registry represents the largest collection of standardized data for the DM population so far. Our concept improved collaboration among health care professionals by continuously providing tools to monitor cohorts in participating centres. This registry proves to be a powerful device for promoting both research and medical care and is applicable to other countries. In the context of emerging therapies, such integrated platform contributes to the standardisation of DM research and may optimize international multicentre clinical trials.

The DM-scope registry: a rare disease innovative framework bridging the gap between research and medical care

BackgroundThe relevance of registries as a key component for developing clinical research for rare diseases (RD) and improving patient care has been acknowledged by most stakeholders. As recent studies pointed to several limitations of RD registries our challenge was (1) to improve standardization and data comparability; (2) to facilitate interoperability between existing RD registries; (3) to limit the amount of incomplete data; (4) to improve data quality. This report describes the innovative concept of the DM-Scope Registry that was developed to achieve these objectives for Myotonic Dystrophy (DM), a prototypical example of highly heterogeneous RD. By the setting up of an integrated platform attractive for practitioners use, we aimed to promote DM epidemiology, clinical research and patients care management simultaneously.ResultsThe DM-Scope Registry is a result of the collaboration within the French excellence network established by the National plan for RDs. Inclusion criteria is all genetically confirmed DM individuals, independently of disease age of onset. The dataset includes social-demographic data, clinical features, genotype, and biomaterial data, and is adjustable for clinical trial data collection. To date, the registry has a nationwide coverage, composed of 55 neuromuscular centres, encompassing the whole disease clinical and genetic spectrum. This widely used platform gathers almost 3000 DM patients (DM1 n = 2828, DM2 n = 142), both children (n = 322) and adults (n = 2648), which accounts for > 20% of overall registered DM patients internationally. The registry supported 10 research studies of various type i.e. observational, basic science studies and patient recruitment for clinical trials.ConclusionThe DM-Scope registry represents the largest collection of standardized data for the DM population. Our concept improved collaboration among health care professionals by providing annual follow-up of quality longitudinal data collection. The combination of clinical features and biomolecular materials provides a comprehensive view of the disease in a given population. DM-Scope registry proves to be a powerful device for promoting both research and medical care that is suitable to other countries. In the context of emerging therapies, such integrated platform contributes to the standardisation of international DM research and for the design of multicentre clinical trials. Finally, this valuable model is applicable to other RDs.

Telephone health services in the field of rare diseases: a qualitative interview study examining the needs of patients, relatives, and health care professionals in Germany

BackgroundRare diseases are, by definition, very serious and chronic diseases with a high negative impact on quality of life. Approximately 350 million people worldwide live with rare diseases. The resulting high disease burden triggers health information search, but helpful, high-quality, and up-to-date information is often hard to find. Therefore, the improvement of health information provision has been integrated in many national plans for rare diseases, discussing the telephone as one access option. In this context, this study examines the need for a telephone service offering information for people affected by rare diseases, their relatives, and physicians.MethodsIn total, 107 individuals participated in a qualitative interview study conducted in Germany. Sixty-eight individuals suffering from a rare disease or related to somebody with rare diseases and 39 health care professionals took part. Individual interviews were conducted using a standardized semi-structured questionnaire. Interviews were analysed using the qualitative content analysis, triangulating patients, relatives, and health care professionals. The fulfilment of qualitative data processing standards has been controlled for.ResultsOut of 68 patients and relatives and 39 physicians, 52 and 18, respectively, advocated for the establishment of a rare diseases telephone service. Interviewees expected a helpline to include expert staffing, personal contact, good availability, low technical barriers, medical and psychosocial topics of counselling, guidance in reducing information chaos, and referrals. Health care professionals highlighted the importance of medical topics of counselling—in particular, differential diagnostics—and referrals.ConclusionsTherefore, the need for a national rare diseases helpline was confirmed in this study. Due to limited financial resources, existing offers should be adapted in a stepwise procedure in accordance with the identified attributes.

The actual questions of the care of rare diseases

The aim was to present the actual situation of rare diseases, especially to characterize the circumstances in Hungary. The most important developments were summarized which could help the care of rare disease patients in the everyday practice. There are around 800 000 patients with rare diseases in Hungary. The lack of information leads to "invisibility" for the health and social care system (most of them without ICD code). Therefore, these patients still have a huge disadvantage even when compared to the patients of common diseases. Important national and international measures took place in the last years to decrease these disadvantages. The Hungarian Centres of Expertise were officially approved, thus several health care providers were able to get membership in the forming European Reference Networks. The rare disease specific "Lifebelt" Information Centre and Help Line was established by HUFERDIS. These steps assist the implementation of the National Rare Disease Plan, although its formal approval process has temporarily stopped because of the reorganization of the health care system. The summarized developments can contribute to define better patient directions, and thus decrease the family knocks about the maze of health, social and educational systems. The realization of Rare Disease National Strategy is needed to improve the current fragmentation of services and enable patients and health, social and educational professionals to provide and use best practice care. This will ensure that all patients with rare disease cannot only be diagnosed quickly, but also have timely access to the care and support that they need, resulting in a decreasing burden of families and society. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(47): 1851-1856.

Hypophosphatasia: the patient’s and patient’s family’s point of view

Today, public opinion and the French authorities are more aware of rare diseases, in particular due to the implementation of national plans for rare diseases (PNMR I: 2005-2008 and PNMR II: 2011-2016), the existence of national networks and the current organization of the reference expert centers for rare diseases. While the management of rare diseases is now better structured, it remains long for the patients to be diagnosed. It is not always easy for physicians to clearly identify one of the 7,000 rare diseases even though they increasingly ask themselves the question: is this a rare disease? A person diagnosed with a rare disease lives in a familial, social and professional environment that has not prepared him or her, suddenly or after years of uncertainty, for such an experience. It may be temptng to take refuge in isolation. The patient's pathway is a real challenge and include the recognition to his/her 'difference' and the right to benefit from the expert medical and social care. Patients affected with hypophosphatasia, a very rare bone and dental disease, are not exceptions to the rule, despite the dynamic support of Hypophosphatasie Europe, the first patient association, created in 2004. In twelve years, the overall understanding of hypophosphatasia has dramatically improved, including through the discovery of novel therapies. Yet, diagnostic errance, transition between childhood and adulthood and management and care of affected adults remain unsolved issues.

Negotiating prices of drugs for rare diseases.

Rare diseases are often serious, chronic and life-threatening. The European Union (EU) definition of a rare disease is one that affects fewer than 5 in 10 000 people. (1) At present, more than 6000 rare diseases are known; around 80% of them are genetic disorders and half of them occur during childhood. Grouped together, rare diseases affect 6-8% (or about 30 million people) out of the 508 million population of EU countries. (2) This roughly equals the estimated prevalence of diabetes in the World Health Organization European Region, which in 2013 was 6.8% of 658.7 million adults in the 20-79 year age group. (3) This illustrates the paradox of rarity: each disease is rare but collectively, rare diseases affect many people. (4) In 2009, responding to increasing concerns about the issue, the European Council published a recommendation (2009/C 151/02) on action in the field of rare diseases, recommending Member States to adopt and establish national plans for rare diseases by the end of 2013. (2) Rare diseases are associated with a high psychological burden for the patient but they can also have a major impact on a patient's family. (5) In addition to the health burden on patients, few of these diseases have an effective drug treatment available. This is because the drugs to treat rare diseases (called orphan drugs) are not commercially viable for pharmaceutical companies, due to the small number of patients per disease. To encourage pharmaceutical companies to develop and market orphan drugs, the European Parliament and the European Council published the regulation (EC) No 141/2000 on orphan medicinal products in 1999. (1) Orphan designation for a medicine is granted at the European level by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Three criteria must be met, as stated in the regulation: (i) the medicine must be intended for the treatment, prevention or diagnosis of a disease that is life-threatening or chronically debilitating; (ii) the prevalence of the condition in the European Union must be no more than 5 in 10 000 or it must be unlikely that the marketing of the medicine would generate sufficient returns to justify the investment needed for its development; and (iii) no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition concerned can be authorized, or, if such a method exists, the medicine must be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition. (1) The application for orphan designation, which can be submitted by the sponsor of the medicinal product at any stage of drug development, is then examined within 90 days by the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products of the EMA. When a medicine is granted orphan designation, several incentives are provided to the sponsor of a clinical trial, as stated in regulation (EC) No 141/2000. (1) These incentives include protocol assistance, scientific advice from EMA before the submission for marketing authorization and market exclusivity of 10 years once the medicine is marketed. This period of market exclusivity can be extended by two years for medicines that comply with an agreed investigation plan for medicines for paediatric care. Finally, depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required, reductions in fees to be paid for regulatory activities related to the evaluation of orphan medicinal products by EMA (e.g. protocol assistance, application for marketing authorization) can also be available for the sponsor. By the end of 2015, 89 different orphan medicinal products had received authorization to enter the market from the EMA's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, and 123 other medicinal products intended for rare diseases but without the orphan designation in Europe also received the European marketing authorization. (6) In addition, an increasing number of applications for orphan designation are submitted to EMA each year (Fig. 1). (7) As a consequence, an increasing number of applications for a marketing authorization of an orphan medicinal product is observed each year. …

Guidelines for clinical pharmacological practices in Huntington's disease

ObjectiveEvidence-based medicine is a difficult goal to achieve in rare diseases where randomized controlled trials are lacking. This report provides guidelines that capitalize on both the literature and expertise of the French National Huntington Disease Reference Centre to optimalize pharmacological therapeutic interventions for Huntington's disease (HD). Material and methodsHD experts conducted a systematic analysis of the literature from 1965 to 2013, using a scoring procedure established by the French National Authority for Health. These experts offered their views when evidence was missing to set up provisional guidelines for care in HD. These guidelines were then scored and amended through two subsequent online questionnaires (using SurveyMonkey® scoring), and one face-to-face meeting with an external multidisciplinary working group as a step towards validation. ResultsExcept for the beneficial effects of tetrabenazine in chorea, none of the published recommendations were grounded on established scientific evidence. Second-generation antipsychotics are nevertheless the first choice for patients with psychiatric manifestations (low level of evidence). All other guidelines are based on low-level evidence and little professional agreement. ConclusionPatients’ care has greatly improved over the last few years despite the lack of high-level evidence standards. Guidelines are based on the expertise of trained specialists from the French National Plan for Rare Diseases. This strategy should now be extended internationally to promote future studies and to harmonize worldwide care of HD.

The attitudes of medical students towards rare diseases: A cross-sectional study

Rare diseases are chronic, degenerative and may lead to permanent disability. We aimed to assess knowledge and attitudes of the 3rd and 6th year medical students towards the treatment of rare diseases in Serbia. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, two samples of students were questioned for a survey: 350/446 (78.48%) students of the 3rd year, and 242/517 (46.81%) students of the 6th year. In this cross-sectional study, two samples of students were questioned for a survey: 350/446 (78.48%) students of the 3rd year, and 242/517 (46.81%) students of the 6th year. Sixth year students estimated that they were more informed on the issue analyzed than the 3rd year students (median value of 4 and 3, interquartile range of 3-5, and 1-4, respectively; p < 0.05). However, a significant percentage of participants estimated incorrectly the prevalence of rare diseases according to the European Union standards (3rd year - 42.68%, 6th year - 49.55%). Core curriculum subjects were the main source of information on rare diseases (3rd year - 63.14%; 6th year - 92.14%). Our participants agreed that the most important problems are the following: high drug prices, difficult access to drugs and lack of public information. Students found, without any differences, that community access to effective drugs for rare disease should be improved (median value - 10, interquartile range 8-10 in both groups, p < 0.05). In order to improve pharmacotherapy of rare diseases in Serbia, the participants suggested establishment of a National Plan for Rare Diseases, approval of more appropriate drugs, simplified access to appropriate medicines, and more rapid diagnostics. It is necessary to improve the knowledge and attitudes of medical students towards pharmacotherapy of rare diseases. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 175023]

Evans Syndrome in Children: Long-Term Outcome in a Prospective French National Observational Cohort.

Evans syndrome (ES) is a rare autoimmune disorder whose long-term outcome is not well known. In France, a collaborative pediatric network set up via the National Rare Disease Plan now provides comprehensive clinical data in children with this disease. Patients aged less than 18 years at the initial presentation of autoimmune cytopenia have been prospectively included into a national observational cohort since 2004. The definition of ES was restricted to the simultaneous or sequential association of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Cases were deemed secondary if associated with a primitive immunodeficiency or systemic lupus erythematosus. In December 2014, we analyzed the data pertaining to 156 children from 26 centers with ES whose diagnosis was made between 1981 and 2014. Median age (range) at the onset of cytopenia was 5.4 years (0.2–17.2). In 85 sequential cases, the time lapse between the first episodes of AIHA and ITP was 2.4 years (0.1–16.3). The follow-up period as from ES diagnosis was 6.5 years (0.1–28.8). ES was secondary, revealing another underlying disease, in 10% of cases; various associated immune manifestations (mainly lymphoproliferation, other autoimmune diseases, and hypogammaglobulinemia) were observed in 60% of cases; and ES remained primary in 30% of cases. Five-year ITP and AIHA relapse-free survival were 25 and 61%, respectively. Overall, 69% of children required one or more second-line immune treatments, and 15 patients (10%) died at the age of 14.3 years (1.7–28.1). To our knowledge, this is the first consistent long-term clinical description of this rare syndrome. It underscores the high rate of associated immune manifestations and the burden of long-term complications and treatment toxicity. Future challenges include (1) the identification of the underlying genetic defects inducing immune dysregulation and (2) the need to better characterize patient subgroups and second-line treatment strategies.

Rare diseases and orphan drugs: Latvian story.

BackgroundTen years have passed since Latvia became a Member State of the EU in 2004. As a result European regulations, including those related to rare diseases and orphan drugs, have been applied to Latvian legislative system. Orphan diseases have been recognized as a priority area for action in the public health system, though there are significant differences in the national healthcare services for rare diseases among the EU States. This study aims to determine situation in the field of rare diseases in Latvia and compare it with other European countries.MethodsWe used the national plan for rare diseases, EUCERD reports, Orphanet data, Latvian and European regulations, publicly available data from the state agencies, and directly contacted drug manufacturers and wholesalers.ResultsNational plan for rare diseases was developed and approved in 2013. Although there are no official designated centers of expertise as well as no specific register for rare diseases. Newborns are screened for only two disorders: phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism. Currently 34 orphan drugs are available on Latvian market. Three medicines (8.8%) are included in the reimbursement drug list, all indicated for Ph + CML. 15 drugs (44.1%) were reimbursed within the framework of individual reimbursement system, and five drugs (14.7%) were provided within the program of medicinal treatment of rare diseases in children.ConclusionsMajority of orphan drugs authorized in the EU are not available in Latvia, moreover those drugs that are available are often not accessible because they are insufficiently reimbursed. Besides, approval of the national plan might be an important step towards improving situation in the field of rare diseases.

Prenatal counselling and the role of the paediatric surgeon

With the development of prenatal ultrasound and of foetal medicine, the paediatric surgeon has extended his knowledge of the natural history of surgical malformations. He is a part of the prenatal team and parents should always be referred to him when a surgical malformation is suspected, even when termination of pregnancy is planned because of an expected poor prognosis. Direct contact between the prenatal medicine specialist and the paediatric surgeon is also highly recommended to ensure continuity in the messages delivered to the parents. Postnatal counselling does not compare with prenatal counselling, and the paediatric surgeon has learned from the obstetrician to modulate his talk by including other conditions that might affect the outcome of the foetus, especially genetically determined syndromes. When the foetal malformation is diagnosed very early, especially in the first trimester, it therefore seems important for the consultation with the paediatric surgeon to be scheduled when the complementary exams required by the anomalies diagnosed are done, in order to avoid later contradictory messages. Repeated consultations should be favoured as they allow provision of more precise information regarding changes in ultrasound and/or MRI images and so decrease parents׳ anxiety and help them to take their decision. Foetal surgery, which has reached various stages of development in different countries, requires paediatric surgeons and obstetricians to join forces to optimise procedures and evaluate their benefit/risk ratio. Since 2004, the National Rare Disease Plan in France has allowed the creation of Rare Disease Centres, which deal with congenital malformations and produce recommendations for the health care pathway of these patients by means of a multidisciplinary approach. This greatly enhances interdisciplinary communication and ensures that best care is provided to the parents-to-be and to their child.

The Creation Of The National Registry Of Rare Diseases In The Slovak Republic

Abstract The creation of a registry of patients with rare diseases is a priority of the National Strategy for Rare Diseases as well as of the National Plan for Rare Diseases. Knowledge of the real number of patients with rare diseases would thus, in addition to basic clinical information, represent an important point in planning health and social care. The presented work introduces points of departure which constitute the basis of a new specific National Registry of Patients with Rare Diseases in the Slovak Republic. Its creation builds on the existing registries as well as on the structure of health care in the Slovak Republic. With the protection of personal data in mind, the collection of data will be carried out by the National Centre of Health Information (NCHI), which will also use the existing tool in the process of creation. Thanks to the cooperation between NCHI and the Slovak Society of Medical Genetics, NCHI developed separate reporting forms on rare diseases according to OMIM (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man) and ORPHANET rare disease coding (ORPHA codes of rare diseases), and the International classification of diseases code (ICD 10). The activities also include cooperation with the existing registries (part of which are rare diseases). For example National Registry of Congenital Developmental Heart Defects, national register of neuromuscular disorders, oncologic register or register of diabetes mellitus. Gathering the information from these registries we will extend the data about rare diseases in the Slovak republic. At the international level the participation in the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) is important.

A methodology for a minimum data set for rare diseases to support national centers of excellence for healthcare and research.

Although rare disease patients make up approximately 6-8% of all patients in Europe, it is often difficult to find the necessary expertise for diagnosis and care and the patient numbers needed for rare disease research. The second French National Plan for Rare Diseases highlighted the necessity for better care coordination and epidemiology for rare diseases. A clinical data standard for normalization and exchange of rare disease patient data was proposed. The original methodology used to build the French national minimum data set (F-MDS-RD) common to the 131 expert rare disease centers is presented. To encourage consensus at a national level for homogeneous data collection at the point of care for rare disease patients, we first identified four national expert groups. We reviewed the scientific literature for rare disease common data elements (CDEs) in order to build the first version of the F-MDS-RD. The French rare disease expert centers validated the data elements (DEs). The resulting F-MDS-RD was reviewed and approved by the National Plan Strategic Committee. It was then represented in an HL7 electronic format to maximize interoperability with electronic health records. The F-MDS-RD is composed of 58 DEs in six categories: patient, family history, encounter, condition, medication, and questionnaire. It is HL7 compatible and can use various ontologies for diagnosis or sign encoding. The F-MDS-RD was aligned with other CDE initiatives for rare diseases, thus facilitating potential interconnections between rare disease registries. The French F-MDS-RD was defined through national consensus. It can foster better care coordination and facilitate determining rare disease patients' eligibility for research studies, trials, or cohorts. Since other countries will need to develop their own standards for rare disease data collection, they might benefit from the methods presented here.

Diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: French practical guidelines.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most frequent chronic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia in adults. The management of rare diseases in France has been organised by a national plan for rare diseases, which endorsed a network of expert centres for rare diseases throughout France. This article is an overview of the executive summary of the French guidelines for the management of IPF, an initiative that emanated from the French National Reference Centre and the Network of Regional Competence Centres for Rare Lung Diseases. This review aims at providing pulmonologists with a document that: 1) combines the current available evidence; 2) reviews practical modalities of diagnosis and management of IPF; and 3) is adapted to everyday medical practice. The French practical guidelines result from the combined efforts of a coordination committee, a writing committee and a multidisciplinary review panel, following recommendations from the Haute Autorité de Santé. All recommendations included in this article received at least 90% agreement by the reviewing panel. Herein, we summarise the main conclusions and practical recommendations of the French guidelines.

Ritka Betegségek Nemzeti Terve

The rarity of low prevalence diseases and the lack of information, research, diagnosis, treatment and expert availability may mean that the people affected do not benefit from the health resources and services they need. Rare diseases are considered to have little impact on society as a whole, yet they pose serious difficulties for sufferers and their families. By the end of the last century, two robust achievements in science and technology, i.e. the biotechnological and informatics revolutions, have created a real base for global approach to rare diseases by coordinating the capacities for health care, biomedical research and drug development and pooling the very limited resources available both nationally and transnationally. The European Commission has taken a number of actions which help patients and professionals to share expertise and information across borders with the objective of reducing the number of people suffering from these types of diseases. These actions together form the legal basis of the European Union policy on rare diseases. Orphan or rare diseases are now one of the priorities in the public health programmes in European Union. In 2009, the document "European Union Council Recommendation on an action in the field of rare diseases" was released with the main goal to provide national health authorities with supporting tools for the development and implementation of national plans and strategies for rare diseases by the end of 2013. This recommendation adopted by European Union Member States, allows common policy guidelines to be shared everywhere in Europe. By September 2013 the Hungarian National Plan for Rare Diseases, a health policy strategy until 2020 was finalized. The present report gives a short view on the document.

The French national registry for rare diseases: an integrated model from care to epidemiology and research

The first national plan for rare diseases (2005-2008) set the network for care and research in the rare diseases (RD) field across all French hospitals. The 131 RD centers of expertise (CE) initiated then various IT projects to register electronically their RD patients. The CEMARA project [1] up to now registered 235,000 RD patients, from 62 RDCE (out of 131), 383 units of care and described over 4000 rare diseases. The identified limits of the CEMARA model were: i) data collection was not incorporated in the care setting, ii) exposed to data re-entry, iii) coping with data privacy new regulations and iv) gaining a wide national consensus on the data to collect for all RDs and from all CEs. To overcome these limits, the 2nd national plan for rare diseases (2010-2014) promoted the creation of a national data repository for all rare diseases (BNDMR) based on the CEMARA model with the following objectives: i) identifying RD patients within the health information systems in care setting, ii) describing the RD demand of care, and the adequacy of the supply and iii) identifying patients eligible for clinical trials or cohorts. The proposed national architecture incorporates a national minimum data set for all rare diseases (F-MDS-RD) into hospital information care systems to enable electronic patient files re-use for epidemiological studies or research [2]. To ensure a full interoperability between local hospital information systems and the BNDMR, a national interoperability framework is defined. It is set on 3 pillars: i) defining a national patient ID for rare diseases that will help to identify patients across different health IS, ii) defining a common data format for all rare diseases, compatible with EHR standards such as HL7, and iii) setting the necessary technical data flows complying with strict security rules for data privacy [3] and security. The minimum data set for rare diseases is now being implemented in several local systems, and connectors are being rolled out with several database suppliers. Data re-entry is nowadays a major concern for clinicians. Enabling data re-use is not only an interoperability problem; data must be structured, qualified, standardized [4] and suitable for research [5]. The structuration of the data collected is set on a variety of standard terminologies such as Orphanet or the Human Phenotype Ontology which requires to be accompanied with the necessary IT tools to help clinicians coding the data [6].

Emergency guidelines and emergency cards

Rare diseases are not well known by physicians acting in emergency departments, and taking care of RD patients in the emergency setting can prove challenging for them. Emergency situations can result from the rare disease itself or be unrelated to it, but most often need particular measures to be taken. In order to guide the emergency practitioner in a very practical way to take care of a patient with a diagnosis of a rare disease, a collection of emergency guidelines is being developed by Orphanet. They are produced by French reference centres for rare diseases and reviewed by emergency practitioners. Patient organizations are also involved in their production so as to make sure that relevant non-medical aspects of care are taken into account. Emergency guidelines are organized in two sections dedicated to the pre-hospital setting and to the hospital emergency department respectively. So far more than 50 guidelines are available in French and are being translated and adapted in other European languages. They have been downloaded more than 340,000 times in 2013 from the Orphanet website (http://www.orpha.net). They are also available in the Orphanet mobile application (developed for iOS and Android), in order to allow emergency practitioners to have timely information in the pre-hospital setting. Besides of emergency guidelines, the French Ministry of Health has produced personal emergency cards for a number of rare diseases during the first national plan for rare diseases. These cards include summarized recommendations in case of emergency intended to physicians, as well as relevant personal information to be completed by a practitioner in the centre of reference. It includes some recommendations for patients intended to prevent emergency situations related to the disease. Emergency cards are also available on the Orphanet website.