National Institute Of Nursing Research Research Articles

THE EYE OF THE STORM: END-OF-LIFE CARE IN NEW YORK CITY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: LESSONS FOR THE FUTURE OF HOSPICE

Abstract Public health containment and mitigation policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including social distancing, infection control, and self-quarantine led to a substantial reduction in transmission of COVID-19. Yet they also brought about significant disruptions in healthcare, particularly care at the end of life. These challenges were amplified in older adults of color and those who contend with differing social determinants of health that impact care outcomes. Hospices played a key role in supporting patients at home throughout the pandemic and yet concomitant with the surge in demand for hospice, there was a gap in hospice delivery, exposing latent vulnerabilities in the capacity to respond to a crisis that demanded a coordinated, synchronized approach. We present the findings of an innovative, mixed methods study funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research that combines qualitative content analysis of linked electronic health records with qualitative stakeholder interviews to gain an in-depth understanding of the challenges of delivering hospice care in NYC during the pandemic. Interviews include the perspectives of nurses, managers, administrators, physicians, medical directors, social workers, and clergy from several healthcare practices. Our presenters address 4 key areas: a) Provider experiences and organizational challenges and successes, b) Challenges in transitioning from primary care to hospice, c) Efforts to provide equity-focused hospice care, and d) The central role of home health aides in end-of-life care. Together, these experiences provide insights into lessons learned and point to new opportunities to design and deliver high-quality hospice care in the future.

A 10 Year Analysis of Gender Distribution in National Institutes of Health Funding for Non-Malignant Hematology

Introduction: Historically, there has been an underrepresentation of women in the field of hematology. Consequently, this makes them less likely to receive academic research grants. Here, we present a ten year retrospective analysis of the Research Project Grants (R01) awarded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through the fiscal years of 2012-2022. The grants were categorized by various NIH agencies. This temporal analysis examines gender disparities under the field of non-malignant hematology research. Methods:Data was extracted for the fiscal years 2012-2022 focusing exclusively on R01 grants awarded and categorized by the various NIH agencies. Data was leveraged using the NIH RePORTER tool, Tidyverse, and janitor packages in R. The dataset incorporated key grant parameters such as grant ID, agency code, activity code, abstract text, project title, fiscal year, activity status, award amount, organization, and principal investigator's(PI) name. In order to distinguish a PI's gender, PI's first names were processed using the gender package in R, which provided a gender-wise distribution of recipients. For statistical analyses, proportions of females with accepted R01 grants were compared between 2012 to 2022; this proportion analysis was also done among each NIH agency. Further, linear regression and associated statistical tests were used to identify whether there was significant change in grants received by either gender over this time period. Results: A total of 250,031 R01 grants were awarded by the NIH during the fiscal years of 2012 to 2022. Females (n=82,152: 32.9% (95% CI 0.41-0.43) received fewer grants than males (n=167,879: 67.1%, (95% CI 0.50-0.55). Across 2012 to 2022, there was no significant change in R01 grants awarded among men (16,221 to 15,601, p-value= 0.52). In contrast, there was a significant difference for females in the R01 grants awarded across 2012 to 2022 (6,865 to 9,339, p-value <0.001). In 2012, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), and National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) awarded less than 25% of the total grants to females. By 2022, of all the agencies, the NBIB remained the agency with the most extensive gender gap with females being awarded only 23% of grants. In contrast, the National Institute of Minority Health and Disparities (NIMHD) and the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) were the only agencies in 2012 to award more grants to females with approximately 52% and 74% of grants respectively. In 2022, the NINR and NIHMD continued to show more grants awarded to females versus males. In addition to those agencies, by 2022, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development(NICHD) and National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) joined the NINR and NIHMD in awarding more than 50% of grants awarded to females that year. Conclusion: This analysis highlights continued gender disparity as only 33% of total R01 NIH grants were awarded to females during the fiscal years 2012-2022 in non-malignant hematologic research. Although, it is noted that while some agencies have made strides towards gender parity, others continue to have a significant gap. While this remains a systemic and multifaceted issue, identifying these areas of gender disparity will enable targeted efforts to bridge this gap and advance gender equality.

A roadmap for social determinants of health and biological nursing research in the National Institute of Nursing Research 2022–2026 Strategic Plan: Optimizing health and advancing health equity using antiracist framing

BackgroundHealth equity is essential for improving the well-being of all individuals and groups, and research remains a critical element for understanding barriers to health equity. While considering how to best support research that acknowledges current health challenges, it is crucial to understand the role of social justice frameworks within health equity research and the contributions of minoritized researchers. Additionally, there should be an increased understanding of the influence of social determinants of health on biological mechanisms. PurposeBiological health equity research seeks to understand and address health disparities among historically excluded populations. DiscussionWhile there are examples of studies in this area led by minoritized researchers, some individuals and groups remain understudied due to underfunding. Research within minoritized populations must be prioritized to authentically achieve health equity. Furthermore, there should be increased funding from National Institutes of Health to support minoritized researchers working in this area.

PhD program faculty: Preparing the next generation of nurse researchers

This article explores approaches to strengthening research education in nursing doctoral (PhD) programs with a focus on the roles of interdisciplinary faculty and the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), 2022-2026 Strategic Plan. Our view is that these components are interrelated and essential in educating the next generation of nurse researchers. To explore these topics, we undertook two analyses: (1) an examination of the preparation of PhD directors across the 119 AACN member schools; and (2) an evaluation of NIH funding levels to schools of nursing and the principal investigators' backgrounds among NINR grantees. We found significant homogeneity in the backgrounds of PhD directors in schools of nursing and considerable NINR funding to non-nurse researchers on topics within the nursing discipline. To strengthen the research infrastructure of PhD programs and achieve the American Association of Colleges of Nursing's (AACN) vision for doctoral education, we suggest incorporating interdisciplinary faculty and greater utilization of the NINR Strategic Plan.

Advancing family science and health equity through the 2022–2026 National Institute of Nursing Research strategic plan

BackgroundConsistent with the National Institute of Nursing Research's mission of leading nursing research to address current health challenges, the new Strategic Plan identifies five research lenses: health equity, social determinants of health, population and community health, prevention and health promotion, and systems and models of care. Family research, central to nursing research and practice, is the cornerstone of social ecology and represents a critical intersection of social and structural determinants of health. PurposeWe argue why family health is essential to the 2022-2026 Strategic Plan and how the lenses can strengthen family research. MethodsDrawing from collective expertise and existing literature in family research, sociology, psychology, and nursing science, the authors present a new conceptual model that integrates structural racism and heteropatriarchy to examine the salience of family structure statuses for family outcomes and discuss approaches to research design, empirical measurement, and interpretation in order to bring this new model into practice. DiscussionThe NINR Strategic Plan has the potential to dismantle structures that perpetuate racism and health inequity within and across family structures. An underaddressed research area under the new Strategic Plan relates to how social determinants of health influence and are influenced by families. ConclusionWe challenge all investigators, not just family scientists, to expand the scope of their research to conceptualize the role of family on health inequities.

Urinary cadmium and endometriosis prevalence in a US nationally representative sample: results from NHANES 1999-2006.

Is exposure to toxic metal cadmium associated with increased endometriosis prevalence among a nationally representative sample of the US population? Concentrations of urinary cadmium, a long-term biomarker (10-30 years) of cadmium exposure, were associated with an increased prevalence of endometriosis. Cadmium exhibits estrogenic properties and may increase the risk of endometriosis, a gynecologic condition associated with substantial morbidity, for which estrogen has a central pathogenic role. Previous epidemiological studies of cadmium and endometriosis have yielded mixed results, with null, positive, and inverse associations being reported. We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from four cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2006. The study population comprised participants aged 20-54 years who had an endometriosis diagnosis, available data on urinary cadmium, and a glomerular filtration rate ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (unweighted n = 1647). Urinary cadmium was measured by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, and we used urinary creatinine concentrations and covariate-adjusted standardization to account for urinary dilution. Self-reported diagnosis of endometriosis was ascertained by interview. We examined the association between quartiles of urinary cadmium and endometriosis using log-binomial regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% CIs. We observed twice the prevalence of endometriosis for participants with cadmium concentrations in the second quartile (versus the first quartile) (aPR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1, 3.9) and the third quartile (versus the first quartile) (aPR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1, 3.7). Our data also suggested a 60% increased prevalence of endometriosis with urinary cadmium concentrations in the fourth quartile (versus the first quartile) (aPR 1.6, 95% CI: 0.8, 3.2). In a sensitivity analysis, restricting the study population to premenopausal participants with an intact uterus and at least one ovary (unweighted n = 1298), stronger associations accompanied by wider CIs were observed. We were limited by the ascertainment of urinary cadmium and endometriosis diagnosis at a single time point, given the cross-sectional study design, and we relied on self-report of endometriosis diagnosis. However, urinary cadmium characterizes long-term exposure and findings from validation studies suggest that misclassification of self-reported endometriosis diagnosis may be minimal. This study suggests that cadmium is associated with an increased endometriosis prevalence. Given the substantial morbidity conferred by endometriosis and that the general population is ubiquitously exposed to cadmium, further research is warranted to confirm our findings. This work was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research (grant R00NR017191 to K.U.) of the National Institutes of Health. The authors report no conflict of interest. N/A.

Patterns of patient-reported symptoms and association with sociodemographic and systemic sclerosis disease characteristics: a scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort cross-sectional study

Systemic sclerosis is a heterogenous disease in which little is known about patterns of patient-reported symptom clusters. We aimed to identify classes of individuals with similar anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain symptoms and to evaluate associated sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics. This multi-centre cross-sectional study used baseline data from Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort participants enrolled from 2014 to 2020. Eligible participants completed the PROMIS-29 v2.0 measure. Latent profile analysis was used to identify homogeneous classes of participants based on patterns of anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain scores. Sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics were compared across classes. Among 2212 participants, we identified five classes, including four classes with "Low" (565 participants, 26%), "Normal" (651 participants, 29%), "High" (569 participants, 26%), or "Very High" (193 participants, 9%) symptom levels across all symptoms. Participants in a fifth class, "High Fatigue/Sleep/Pain and Low Anxiety/Depression" (234 participants, 11%) had similar levels of fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain as in the "High" class but low anxiety and depression symptoms. There were significant and substantive trends in sociodemographic characteristics (age, education, race or ethnicity, marital or partner status) and increasing disease severity (diffuse disease, tendon friction rubs, joint contractures, gastrointestinal symptoms) across severity-based classes. Disease severity and sociodemographic characteristics of "High Fatigue/Sleep/Pain and Low Anxiety/Depression" class participants were similar to the "High" severity class. Most people with systemic sclerosis can be classified by levels of patient-reported symptoms, which are consistent across symptoms and highly associated with sociodemographic and disease-related variables, except for one group which reports low mental health symptoms despite high levels of other symptoms and substantial disease burden. Studies are needed to better understand resilience in systemic sclerosis and to identify and facilitate implementation of cognitive and behavioural strategies to improve coping and overall quality of life. National Institute of Nursing Research (F31NR019007), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Arthritis Society Canada, the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, the Jewish General Hospital Foundation, McGill University, Scleroderma Society of Ontario, Scleroderma Canada, Sclérodermie Québec, Scleroderma Manitoba, Scleroderma Atlantic, Scleroderma Association of BC, Scleroderma SASK, Scleroderma Australia, Scleroderma New South Wales, Scleroderma Victoria, and Scleroderma Queensland.

Visualization of health information within immersive virtual reality environments.

The Advanced Visualization Branch of the National Institute of Nursing Research uses computer technologies to study information visualization in support of self-care management. Advanced technologies, such as immersive virtual reality (IVR), afford researchers the opportunity to study health information visualization where user-initiated information search in visually dense settings precedes acquisition, interpretation, and use. While IVR has broad applicability in healthcare, we chose to target lay people managing chronic disease because of the growing unmet need to translate clinical recommendations into everyday behaviors. To explore how lay people seek, acquire, and interpret health information in everyday settings, we developed an IVR grocery store. In this environment, a person can locate food products, read and compare nutrition labels, and use information to make food selections. The goal of this perspective is to introduce the opportunities afforded by IVR to both present and study health information visualization and to highlight critical design considerations.

0326 Symptom trajectories in adults with stable heart failure and insomnia: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of CBT-I

Abstract Introduction Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) improves individual symptoms of fatigue and daytime sleepiness; however, little is known how CBT-I improves multiple co-occurring daytime symptoms. The purposes of this study are to (1) identify daytime symptom trajectories in adults with insomnia and stable chronic heart failure (HF) over one year, and (2) determine how symptom trajectories vary based on participation in CBT-I or HF self-management education (attention control condition). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial that looked the sustained effects of CBT-I compared to HF self-management over one year (NCT02660385). We measured daytime symptoms (fatigue, depression, anxiety, dyspnea, pain, and daytime sleepiness) at baseline (pre-treatment) and 3, 6 and 12 months. Symptom cluster trajectory were identified using group-based trajectory modeling, and the association with CBT-I was examined using logistic regressions. Results We randomized 175 participants (M age=63.0 (12.9) years, 57% men). We found four daytime symptom cluster trajectories, (A) low improving symptoms (N = 67, 38.3%); (B) low psychological symptoms and high improving physical symptoms (N = 40, 22.8%); (C), high improving symptoms (N = 42, 24.0%); and (D) high not improving symptoms (N = 26, 14.9%). There was no statistically significant difference between CBT-I and HF self-management across 4 symptom trajectories (p = .2509). However, people who received CBT-I vs. HF self-management education had higher odds of belonging to trajectory A compared to B/C/D after controlling for baseline fatigue (OR = 3.27 95% Confidence Intervals [1.39, 7.68]). Conclusion Most participants experienced improved daytime symptom profiles over 12 months after both interventions. Participants in the CBT-I group experienced symptom improvement even when they started with low symptoms. Support (if any) National Institute of Nursing Research [R01NR016191 and P20NR014126].

Disability research must be a priority for nurses to advance health equity

Disability results from an interplay between health conditions and environmental and personal factors. People with disabilities face substantial and ongoing health inequities; however, research to mitigate these inequalities is lacking. There is an urgent need for a better understanding of the multilevel factors that influence health outcomes in people with visible and invisible disabilities across all the lenses of the National Institute of Nursing Research strategic plan. Disability research must be a priority of nurses and the National Institute of Nursing Research to advance health equity for all.

DNP-PhD Collaboration in NINR-Funded Physical Activity Trials: A Series of Case Studies.

Collaboration between Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) scholars and Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) scholars is crucial to efficiently advance and disseminate nursing science. Also, DNP-PhD collaboration can help achieve priorities outlined in the recent National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) Strategic Plan. The purpose of this series of case studies is to describe exemplars of ongoing DNP-PhD collaborations across three NINR-funded trials (1 completed, 2 ongoing) testing physical activity interventions for women at risk for cardiovascular disease. In our three physical activity intervention trials for women, we categorized examples of DNP-PhD collaboration by the four phases of the team-based research model (development, conceptualization, implementation, and translation). Across all three trials, DNP and PhD scholars contributed successfully to all phases of research in an iterative manner. Future work should focus on expanding DNP-PhD collaboration in behavioral trials, which can inform adapted, contemporary models of iterative DNP-PhD collaboration.

Effects of clinical, comorbid, and social determinants of health on brain ageing in people with and without HIV: a retrospective case-control study.

Neuroimaging reveals structural brain changes linked with HIV infection and related neurocognitive disorders; however, group-level comparisons between people with HIV and people without HIV do not account for within-group heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to quantify the effects of comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and adverse social determinants of health on brain ageing in people with HIV and people without HIV. In this retrospective case-control study, people with HIV from Washington University in St Louis, MO, USA, and people without HIV identified through community organisations or the Research Participant Registry were clinically characterised and underwent 3-Tesla T1-weighted MRI between Dec 3, 2008, and Oct 4, 2022. Exclusion criteria were established by a combination of self-reports and medical records. DeepBrainNet, a publicly available machine learning algorithm, was applied to estimate brain-predicted age from MRI for people with HIV and people without HIV. The brain-age gap, defined as the difference between brain-predicted age and true chronological age, was modelled as a function of clinical, comorbid, and social factors by use of linear regression. Variables were first examined singly for associations with brain-age gap, then combined into multivariate models with best-subsets variable selection. In people with HIV (mean age 44·8 years [SD 15·5]; 78% [296 of 379] male; 69% [260] Black; 78% [295] undetectable viral load), brain-age gap was associated with Framingham cardiovascular risk score (p=0·0034), detectable viral load (>50 copies per mL; p=0·0023), and hepatitis C co-infection (p=0·0065). After variable selection, the final model for people with HIV retained Framingham score, hepatitis C, and added unemployment (p=0·0015). Educational achievement assayed by reading proficiency was linked with reduced brain-age gap (p=0·016) for people without HIV but not for people with HIV, indicating a potential resilience factor. When people with HIV and people without HIV were modelled jointly, selection resulted in a model containing cardiovascular risk (p=0·0039), hepatitis C (p=0·037), Area Deprivation Index (p=0·033), and unemployment (p=0·00010). Male sex (p=0·078) and alcohol use history (p=0·090) were also included in the model but were not individually significant. Our findings indicate that comorbid and social determinants of health are associated with brain ageing in people with HIV, alongside traditional HIV metrics such as viral load and CD4 cell count, suggesting the need for a broadened clinical perspective on healthy ageing with HIV, with additional focus on comorbidities, lifestyle changes, and social factors. National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Nursing Research, and National Institute of Drug Abuse.

A Center Experience with Common Data Elements in Chronic Illness Self-Management Research.

In recent decades, the use of common data elements has expanded across the health disciplines. This has included growth within programs of research focused on self-management and family nursing. Family nursing and self-management science may be expanded with the increased use of common concepts, measures, and theoretical frameworks. This article describes the experience of exploring the use of common data elements and identifying shared concepts from the perspective of one National Institute of Nursing Research funded Exploratory Center in Self-Management. Guidance offered by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory is discussed, and implications for family research are presented.

Improving Self-management of Type 2 Diabetes in Latinx Patients: Protocol for a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Involving Community Health Workers, Registered Nurses, and Family Members

The rate of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among Mexican American individuals is 16.3%, about twice that of non-Hispanic White individuals. While a number of education approaches have been developed and shown to improve diabetes self-management behaviors and glycemic control for Spanish-speaking Latinx patients with T2DM, there is little research to guide health practitioners regarding which interventions to apply and when so that resources are used efficiently, and treatment outcomes are maximized. This study aimed to describe an adaptive intervention that integrates community mental health workers, diabetes nurse educators, family members, and patients as partners in care while promoting diabetes self-management for Mexican American individuals with T2DM. The project incorporates four evidence-based, culturally tailored treatments to determine what sequence of intervention strategies work most efficiently and for whom. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM, achieving better control of diabetes and lowering the associated medical complications experienced disproportionally by Mexican American individuals is a public health priority. Funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research (National Institutes of Health grant R01 NR015809), this project used a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial and included 330 Spanish-speaking Latinx patients with T2DM. In the first phase of the study, subjects were randomly assigned to an evidence-based diabetes self-management educational program called Tomando Control delivered in a group format for 6, biweekly 1.5-hour sessions, led either by a community health worker or a diabetes nurse educator. In the second phase of the study, those subjects who did not improve their diabetes self-management behaviors were rerandomized to receive either an augmented version of Tomando Control or a multifamily group treatment focused on problem-solving. The primary outcome measure was the "Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities." Evaluations were made at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. This study was funded in June 2016 for a period of 5 years. Institutional review board approval was obtained in November 2016. Between March 2017 and September 2020, a total of 330 patients were recruited from the outpatient primary care clinics of Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, with a brief hiatus between May 2020 and July 2020 due to COVID-19 restrictions. The study interventions were completed in December 2020. Data collection began in March 2017 and was completed in December 2021. Data analysis is expected to be completed in Spring 2023, and results will be published in Fall 2023. The results of this trial should help practitioners in selecting the optimal approach for improving diabetes self-management in Spanish-speaking, Latinx patients with T2DM. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03092063; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03092063. DERR1-10.2196/44793.

Rehabilitation Needs of Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Oral Venetoclax and Infusional Hypomethylating Agent

<h3>Research Objectives</h3> To better understand the rehabilitation (occupational and physical therapy (OT/PT)) needs of adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia at cycle 1 for treatment of oral Venetoclax (VEN) and Infusional Hypomethylating Agent (HMA). <h3>Design</h3> Prospective inception cohort trial (Clinicaltrial.gov #NCT04570709). <h3>Setting</h3> National Cancer Institute- funded, public comprehensive cancer center in Southern US, in both outpatient and inpatient settings. <h3>Participants</h3> Older adults (≥60 years) with newly diagnosed AML, who received HMA + VEN chemotherapy, had caregiver willing to participate, and were not referred to hospice. <h3>Interventions</h3> Patients were evaluated by oncology nurse, OT and PT within first week of starting treatment. <h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3> Possibilities for Activity Scale (PActS), Activity Measure in Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) mobility and activities of daily living (ADL) scales, Performance Rate Assessment of Self-Care Skills (PASS, medication management and hand hygiene task), clock-drawing, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Berg Balance Scale. <h3>Results</h3> Patients (N= 20) were 74.7±7.5 years, (range: 64-89), predominantly male (n=15, 75 %), White (n=18, 90%) and with some college education (n= 11, 55%). Average PActS score 43, (range 29-60), AM-PAC ADL raw scores (23.4 mean, 1.3SD, 19-24) and mobility (19.7 mean, 0.7 SD, 17-20), PASS hand hygiene and medication management, both average of 3 (range 1-3), clock drawing (n= 18) average of 12.5 (0.07 SD, 11-13), TUG average 13.1 (4.2SD, 6.6-21.0), Berg average 49.7 (5.9SD, range 39.0-56.0). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Older adults with AML undergoing HMA + VEN have varying needs for cancer rehabilitation services. On average, appear to only need optimization, the range of scores for all measures suggest potential needs for both rehabilitation and optimization with the goal of maintaining functional independence throughout multiple cycles. Future research should investigate patterns of functional decline and potential impact of OT/PT. <h3>Author(s) Disclosures</h3> This grant is funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) R34NR019131-01A1 and UNC, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (Bryant). Pergolotti receives a salary from Select Medical.

TriService Nursing Research Program: A critical component to support military nursing science

TriService Nursing Research Program: A critical component to support military nursing science

Longitudinal associations of insulin resistance with change in bone mineral density in midlife women.

BACKGROUNDThe effects of insulin resistance on bone mineral density (BMD) are unclear.METHODSIn Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) participants, we used multivariable regression to test average insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-IR) and rate of change in insulin resistance as predictors of rate of change in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD in 3 stages: premenopause (n = 861), menopause transition (MT) (n = 571), and postmenopause (n = 693). Models controlled for age, average BW, change in BW, cigarette use, race and ethnicity, and study site.RESULTSThe relation between HOMA-IR and BMD decline was biphasic. When average log2HOMA-IR was less than 1.5, greater HOMA-IR was associated with slower BMD decline; i.e., each doubling of average HOMA-IR in premenopause was associated with a 0.0032 (P = 0.01, LS) and 0.0041 (P = 0.004, FN) g/cm2 per year slower BMD loss. When greater than or equal to 1.5, average log2HOMA-IR was not associated with BMD change. In women in whom HOMA-IR decreased in premenopause, the association between the HOMA-IR change rate and BMD change rate was positive; i.e, slower HOMA-IR decline was associated with slower BMD loss. In women in whom insulin resistance increased in premenopause, the association was negative; i.e, faster HOMA-IR rise was associated with faster BMD decline. Associations of average HOMA-IR and HOMA-IR change rate with BMD change rate were similar in postmenopause, but weaker during the MT.CONCLUSIONWhen it decreases, insulin resistance is associated with BMD preservation; when it increases, insulin resistance is associated with BMD loss.FUNDINGThe SWAN has grant support from the NIH of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) through the NIH National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), and Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH) (grants U01NR004061, U01AG012505, U01AG012535, U01AG012531, U01AG012539, U01AG012546, U01AG012553, U01AG012554, U01AG012495, and U19AG063720).

Sustained effect on diet quality of a self-care intervention to reduce cardiovascular disease risk among informal rural caregivers of people with chronic illnesses: does health literacy matter?

Abstract Background/Introduction Rural caregivers of those with chronic illnesses have higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk than urban caregivers. Diet is a major lifestyle factor that contributes to CVD risk. However, interventions are often not constructed with health literacy in mind. We previously found a moderation effect of health literacy on short-term (4-month) diet quality from a self-care intervention to reduce cardiovascular disease risk (RICHH) among rural caregivers. The RICHH intervention was designed to be equally effective in caregivers with marginal or adequate health literacy. Purpose To compare the impact of RICHH intervention on 12-month diet quality in rural caregivers with marginal versus adequate health literacy. Methods A total of 296 rural caregivers (54.5±13.7 years old, 76% female) of individuals with chronic illnesses participated. The newest vital sign (NVS) and Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) were used to determine health literacy and diet quality, respectively. The NVS was dichotomized using a cutoff score of 4. The HEI-2015 was computed based on food frequency questionnaires at baseline, 4-month, and 12-month. The RICHH intervention was delivered using video conferencing technology by nurse interventionists once a week for 12 weeks followed by bi-weekly and monthly booster sessions. A piecewise linear mixed-effect model, controlling for age, education, smoking status, and perceived stress, was used to evaluate the impact of the intervention on diet quality between the two health literacy groups. Results There was a significant difference in improvement in the HEI-2015 total scores at 4 months between control and intervention in the marginal health literacy group (beta estimate = 1.56, SE=0.74, P=0.039) but not in the adequate health literacy group (beta estimate = 0.27, SE=0.38, P=0.475). The improvement in the marginal health literacy group was sustained at 12-months (beta estimate = 8.12, SE=3.57, P=0.022). Conclusions The results of our study indicate that an intervention designed to address health literacy is effective in producing a sustained improvement in diet quality to reduce CVD risk in rural caregivers with marginal health literacy. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Institutes of Health National Institute of Nursing Research

The need for a bold research agenda to address structural racism

The National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) released the 2022 to 2026 Strategic Plan Framework to lead nursing research, training, policy, and practice toward addressing pressing health challenges (National Institute of Nursing Research, 2022). Guided by an intentionally inclusive process, NINR solicited feedback from a large and diverse group of stakeholders to inform the development of the Framework. Ultimately, the Framework prioritized narrowing the health disparities gap, a gap that persists despite decades of nursing research (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine, 2021).

A Stress and Pain Self-management mHealth App for Adult Outpatients With Sickle Cell Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Study.

BackgroundThis paper describes the research protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a self-management intervention for adults diagnosed with sickle cell disease (SCD). People living with SCD experience lifelong recurrent episodes of acute and chronic pain, which are exacerbated by stress.ObjectiveThis study aims to decrease stress and improve SCD pain control with reduced opioid use through an intervention with self-management relaxation exercises, named You Cope, We Support (YCWS). Building on our previous findings from formative studies, this study is designed to test the efficacy of YCWS on stress intensity, pain intensity, and opioid use in adults with SCD.MethodsA randomized controlled trial of the short-term (8 weeks) and long-term (6 months) effects of YCWS on stress, pain, and opioid use will be conducted with 170 adults with SCD. Patients will be randomized based on 1:1 ratio (stratified on pain intensity [≤5 or >5]) to be either in the experimental (self-monitoring of outcomes, alerts or reminders, and use of YCWS [relaxation and distraction exercises and support]) or control (self-monitoring of outcomes and alerts or reminders) group. Patients will be asked to report outcomes daily. During weeks 1 to 8, patients in both groups will receive system-generated alerts or reminders via phone call, text, or email to facilitate data entry (both groups) and intervention use support (experimental). If the participant does not enter data after 24 hours, the study support staff will contact them for data entry troubleshooting (both groups) and YCWS use (experimental). We will time stamp and track patients’ web-based activities to understand the study context and conduct exit interviews on the acceptability of system-generated and staff support. This study was approved by our institutional review board.ResultsThis study was funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health in 2020. The study began in March 2021 and will be completed in June 2025. As of April 2022, we have enrolled 45.9% (78/170) of patients. We will analyze the data using mixed effects regression models (short term and long term) to account for the repeated measurements over time and use machine learning to construct and evaluate prediction models. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was modified to allow for mail-in consent process, internet-based consent process via email or Zoom videoconference, devices delivered by FedEx, and training via Zoom videoconference.ConclusionsWe expect the intervention group to report reductions in pain intensity (primary outcome; 0-10 scale) and in stress intensity (0-10 scale) and opioid use (Wisepill event medication monitoring system), which are secondary outcomes. Our study will contribute to advancing the use of nonopioid therapy such as guided relaxation and distraction techniques for managing SCD pain.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04484272; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04484272International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/33818