National Infection Prevention And Control Research Articles

Evaluating national infection prevention and control minimum requirements: evidence from global cross-sectional surveys, 2017–22

WHO infection prevention and control (IPC) minimum requirements provide standards to reduce the risk of infection during health-care delivery. We aimed to investigate the global implementation of these requirements at national levels and the progress of doing so across 2021-22 compared with 2017-18 to identify future directions for interventions. National IPC focal points were invited to complete an online survey measuring IPC minimum requirements from July 19, 2021, to Jan 31, 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of countries meeting IPC minimum requirements. Country characteristics associated with this outcome were assessed with beta regression. Subset analyses were conducted to compare the 2021-22 indicators with a WHO IPC survey conducted in 2017-18 and to assess the correlation of the proportion of IPC minimum requirements met with the results of other WHO metrics. 106 countries (ie, 13 low income, 27 lower-middle income, 33 upper-middle income, and 33 high income) participated in the survey (56% response rate). Four (4%) of 106 met all IPC minimum requirements. The highest scoring IPC core component was multimodal improvement strategies and the lowest was IPC education and training. The odds of meeting IPC minimum requirements was higher among high-income countries compared with low-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 2·7, 95% CI 1·3-5·8; p=0·020). Compared with the 2017-18 survey, there was a significant increase in the proportion of countries reporting an active national IPC programme (65% to 82%, p=0·037) and a dedicated budget (26% to 44%, p=0·037). Evaluation of the IPC minimum requirements compared with other survey instruments revealed a low positive correlation. To build resilient health systems capable of withstanding future health threats, urgently scaling up adherence to WHO IPC minimum requirements is essential. WHO. For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Baseline evaluation of the World Health Organization (WHO) infection prevention and control (IPC) core components in Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs)

BackgroundComprehensive infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes are proven to reduce the spread of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, published assessments of IPC programmes against the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC Core Components in Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs) at the national and acute healthcare facility level are currently unavailable.MethodsFrom January 2022 to April 2023, a multi-country, cross-sectional study was conducted in PICTs. The self reporting survey was based on the WHO Infection Prevention Assessment Framework (IPCAF) that supports implementing the minimum requirements of the WHO eight core components of IPC programmes at both the national and facility level. The results were presented as a ‘traffic light’ (present, in progress, not present) matrix. Each PICT’s overall status in achieving IPC core components was summarised using descriptive statistics.ResultsFifteen PICTs participated in this study. Ten (67%) PICTs had national IPC programmes, supported mainly by IPC focal points (87%, n = 13), updated national IPC guidelines (80%, n = 12), IPC monitoring and feedback mechanisms (80%, n = 12), and waste management plans (87%, n = 13). Significant gaps were identified in education and training (20%, n = 3). Despite being a defined component in 67% (n = 10) of national IPC programmes, HAI surveillance and monitoring was the lowest scoring core component (13%, n = 2). National and facility level IPC guidelines had been adapted and implemented in 67% (n = 10) PICTs; however, only 40% (n = 6) of PICTs had a dedicated IPC budget, 40% (n = 6) had multimodal strategies for IPC, and 33% (n = 5) had daily environmental cleaning records.ConclusionsIdentifying IPC strengths, gaps, and challenges across PICTs will inform future IPC programme priorities and contribute to regional efforts in strengthening IPC capacity. This will promote global public health through the prevention of HAIs and AMR.

Compliance and determinants of infection prevention and control practices among sanitary workers in public hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.

Best practice of infection prevention and control (IPC) is a hallmark for the patient care in health care settings, but it is a major problem in developing countries like Ethiopia where resources are limited. Ethiopia Federal Ministry of Health working to strengthen its IPC program, but still it there is no organized study conducted on assessment of performance gaps and implementation challenges of IPC practice faced by hospital staffs particularly among sanitary workers (SWs) at public hospitals inline to national and international guidelines. This study focuses on compliance and determinants of IPC among sanitary worker in public hospitals in eastern Ethiopia: A cross sectional study design. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 809 SWs and eight IPC experts in public hospitals, eastern Ethiopia, from May to August 2023. A standard questionnaire was used to collect data. Face-to-face interview was conducted. Ten (10) question pursued to answer YES/NO were prepared. The cut point for categories of IPC practice was 1: Good (16-20 scores), 2: Fair (10-15 scores), and 3: Poor (<10 scores). The cut point for compliance and noncompliance of IPC practice among hospitals was mean (500.1). Multi-level ordinal logistic regression models was applied to explore the association of dependent and independent variables at individual level (Model 1), hospital level (Model 2) and at both (Model 3). Crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) at 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to report the result. The compliance of IPC practice among SWs was 36.21% (32.72, 39.82%). The Multilevel ordinal logistic regression model shows that SWs who have good knowledge of IPC trend (AOR: 4.70, 95% CI: 2.11-10.46), SWs who are not addictive with alcohol (AOR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.15,4.78) and chew Khat (AOR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.06,2.46) and smoke cigarette (AOR: 3.15, 95% CI: 2.35-5.41), and SWs without job stress (AOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.86-2.48) were more compliant to IPC practice. Similarly, those who do not have workload (AOR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.56-4.82), work <8 h/day (AOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.92-2.30), and those who have good social recognition in hospitals (AOR: 6.08, 95% CI: 4.24-8.71) were more likely to increase the compliance of IPC practice among SWs. The multilevel random-effect model revealed 93.71% of the variability of compliance of IPC practice explained by both individual and hospital level factors. The overall study found that inadequate IPC practice was reported among SWs as well as by IPC experts due to poor knowledge of IPC trend and individual behaviors and working environment. Thus, the study advised that hospitals have to develop and establish IPC implementation guidelines in order to solve the concerns among these groups; national IPC office should follow its implementation across health care settings particularly at public hospitals.

Implementing a continuous quality-improvement framework for tuberculosis infection prevention and control in healthcare facilities in China, 2017-2019.

Tuberculosis (TB) infection prevention and control (IPC) in healthcare facilities is key to reducing transmission risk. A framework for systematically improving TB IPC through training and mentorship was implemented in 9 healthcare facilities in China from 2017 to 2019. Facilities conducted standardized TB IPC assessments at baseline and quarterly thereafter for 18 months. Facility-based performance was assessed using quantifiable indicators for IPC core components and administrative, environmental, and respiratory protection controls, and as a composite of all control types We calculated the percentage changes in scores over time and differences by IPC control type and facility characteristics. Scores for IPC core components increased by 72% during follow-up when averaged across facilities. The percentage changes for administrative, environmental, and respiratory protection controls were 39%, 46%, and 30%, respectively. Composite scores were 45% higher after the intervention. Overall, scores increased most during the first 6 months. There was no association between IPC implementation and provincial economic development or volume of TB services. TB IPC policies and practices showed most improvement early during implementation and did not differ consistently by facility characteristics. The training component of the project helped increase the capacity of healthcare professionals to manage TB transmission risks. Lessons learned here will inform national TB IPC guidance.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clusters in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and other neonatal units in New York State (NYS), 2001 to 2017

New York State (NYS) mandates reporting of all hospital-associated communicable disease outbreaks. We describe trends in NYS surveillance for neonatal unit methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreaks, the evolution of national MRSA infection prevention and control (IPC) recommendations, and IPC measures taken by NYS neonatal units. We evaluated trends of reported neonatal unit MRSA outbreaks by etiology from 2001 to 2017. We reviewed all reports and the use of IPC recommendations over time. From 2001 to 2017, 124 MRSA outbreaks were reported in 47 hospital neonatal units, with a total of 1,055 laboratory-confirmed infant cases, 18 infant deaths, and 52 laboratory-confirmed staff cases. The number of outbreaks increased with the level of care. During the study period, a higher proportion of hospitals reported implementing IPC measures, including reinforcing hand hygiene compliance (increased from 79.2% to 95.1%) and enhancing environmental cleaning and disinfection (increased from 4.2% to 78.0%) as well as performing active surveillance testing (AST) on exposed neonates (increased from 4.2% to 51.2%) and molecular testing on MRSA-positive isolates (increased from 5.3% to 18.9%). From 2001 to 2017, IPC measures in neonatal units increased in parallel with expanded national IPC recommendations. However, MRSA outbreaks in neonatal units continued to be frequent occurrences in NYS.

Mapping of infection prevention and control education and training in some countries of the World Health Organization’s Eastern Mediterranean Region: current situation and future needs

BackgroundA strong understanding of infection prevention and control (IPC) procedures and comprehensive training among healthcare workers is essential for effective IPC programs. These elements play a crucial role in breaking the chain of nosocomial infections by preventing the transmission of resistant organisms to patients and staff members. This study mapped the components of IPC education and training across various member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) at national, academic, and healthcare institutional levels.MethodsA self-administered structured online questionnaire based on the WHO “Core Component 3” of IPC programs at the national and acute healthcare facility levels (IPC education and training) was given to national IPC focal persons in each of the WHO’s EMR countries between February and March 2023.ResultsFrom 14 of the 22 countries,15 IPC persons participated in the survey. Most countries have scattered nonhomogeneous IPC education programs in human health undergraduate majors without considering it a standalone module. Academic institutions are rarely involved, and elaborate and predefined undergraduate IPC education programs provided by universities are present in 21.4% of the countries. In 71.4% of these countries, postgraduate training targeting IPC professionals is provided by national IPC teams, primarily based on national IPC guidelines developed with the aid of the WHO. Generally, healthcare worker training relies heavily on healthcare facilities in 92.9% of the countries, rather than on a national training program. In 42.9% of the countries, practicing IPC physicians are not necessarily specialists of infectious disease or medical microbiologists and IPC nurses are not required to specialize in IPC. However, nonspecialized IPC professionals are expected to undergo training upon employment and before beginning practice. Nongovernmental organizations such as the WHO play a significant role in IPC education and in supporting national IPC authorities in establishing national IPC guidelines, as it is the case in 78.6% of these countries.ConclusionClear disparities exist in IPC education and training across different countries in the WHO’s EMR. Establishing a regional scientific network specializing in IPC would help bridge the existing gaps and standardize this education within individual countries and across countries in the region. This region needs to establish IPC certification standards and standardized education curricula.

Improvement in Infection Prevention and Control Performance Following Operational Research in Sierra Leone: A Before (2021) and After (2023) Study.

Infection prevention and control (IPC) is crucial to limit health care-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance. An operational research study conducted in Sierra Leone in 2021 reported sub-optimal IPC performance and provided actionable recommendations for improvement. This was a before-and-after study involving the national IPC unit and all twelve district-level secondary public hospitals. IPC performance in 2021 (before) and in 2023 (after) was assessed using standardized World Health Organization checklists. IPC performance was graded as: inadequate (0-25%), basic (25.1-50%), intermediate (50.1-75%), and advanced (75.1-100%). The overall IPC performance in the national IPC unit moved from intermediate (58%) to advanced (78%), with improvements in all six core components. Four out of six components achieved advanced levels when compared to the 2021 levels. The median score for hospitals moved from basic (50%) to intermediate (59%), with improvements in six of eight components. Three of four gaps identified in 2021 at the national IPC unit and four of seven at hospitals had been addressed by 2023. The study highlights the role of operational research in informing actions that improved IPC performance. There is a need to embed operational research as part of the routine monitoring of IPC programs.

An infection prevention and control program established in the wake of the Ebola epidemic: Where are we, and how well are we doing?

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) is a clinical and public health discipline based on a scientific approach and practical preventive and control measures. During the 2014–2016 West African Ebola outbreak, the high number of healthcare worker infections was attributed to inadequate IPC in Sierra Leone. This stimulated the establishment of national and subnational IPC programs. Since then, IPC has remained a priority to improve the health systems and strategic interventions during public health emergencies. Therefore, we conducted a detailed review to assess the status of the IPC programs. Methods: A descriptive analysis of the status of IPC programs in Sierra Leone was done using data from IPC assessments conducted in 2022 by the national IPC team, reviews of reports on program implementation, and experts’ objective opinions. Results:Performance. The national IPC assessment revealed strengths in 4 of 6 WHO IPC core components, with an overall score of 61% positioned at the ‘intermediate’ level of implementation. The best-performing component was ‘IPC guidelines’ (92%) with evidenced-based guidelines being developed and implemented over the years. Secondly, ‘Education and training’ (71%) made progress in basic and advanced IPC training, including the development of a preservice training curriculum. Also, ‘monitoring and audit and feedback’ (69%) and ‘IPC program’ (61%) met the basic requirements of an established Monitoring &amp; Evaluation (M&amp;E) system. Similar progress was made at the healthcare facility level, but with major gaps in ‘workload, staffing, bed-occupancy’ and ‘safe or built environment.’ Sustainability efforts. Evidence-based data on IPC have always been scarce due to a limited capacity to conduct IPC research. The Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative (SORT-IT) on antimicrobial resistance has helped promote evidence-informed decisions and build OR capacity that is relevant to improving program performance. In 2019, Sierra Leone instituted in-country production of alcohol-based handrub and liquid soap as a strategic intervention for providing hand hygiene products for use in healthcare facilities. This intervention was essential during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although most aspects of IPC implementation are government led with strong leadership support, stable funding and sustainability planning are yet to be achieved and will be crucial for long-term success. Conclusions: Most aspects of the IPC core components have been well implemented at the national level since the establishment of the IPC program. However, the program should continue improving the scope and quality of implementation and focus on the development of long-term plans to sustain existing gains and further improve on gap areas at the national level and especially the healthcare-facility level.Disclosures: None

Oregon Project Firstline: A needs assessment of healthcare personnel infection prevention knowledge and training preferences

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) competency is critical for healthcare personnel (HCP) and patient safety. In collaboration with the CDC new national IPC training collaborative called Project Firstline, the Oregon Health Authority’s (OHA) Healthcare Associated Infection (HAI) Program established a state-level program in 2021. The goal of Oregon Project Firstline is to provide relevant, accessible, and engaging IPC training materials for our state’s HCP. We assessed the IPC learning needs of Oregon’s healthcare workforce, and to understand the preferred methods and formats of training across the various HCP roles. Methods: OHA’s HAI program recruited HCP by distributing electronic surveys through multiple healthcare, regulatory, and public health partners’ email listservs and HCP-targeted newsletters. Survey responses were recorded from September 23 to December 10, 2021. The HAI program assessed respondents’ IPC knowledge, online and in-person job training preferences, frequently used training devices, and trusted sources for IPC information. An individual’s understanding of an IPC topic was categorized based on their self-assessed confidence in their knowledge and ability to teach the topic to others. In total, 6,382 surveyed responses were analyzed. Results: The average understanding among HCP was lowest in IPC topics relating to triage and isolation of contagious patients and fit testing of respiratory protection devices. For these topics, 3,208 HCP (66.21%) and 3,657 HCP (75.48%) HCP, respectively, did not understand the topic well enough to teach others (Fig. 1). The highest number of HCP (n = 2,512, 39.36%) requested additional training in methods on how to educate others about IPC topics (ie, “train the trainer”). Surveyed respondents most frequently used personal computers for job trainings in both work and at-home settings (n = 4,603, 72.12%) and 3,437 HCP (53.85%) were open to either in-person or remote formats for job education. The CDC and OHA were the most frequented and trusted IPC sources among surveyed HCP: 4,124 HCP (64.62%) and 3,584 HCP (56.16%), respectively. Conclusions: IPC is a critical topic in HCP training across all healthcare facility types and employee roles. Effective educational planning includes understanding the learners’ knowledge needs and preferred methods of learning. Our learning needs assessment identified important IPC knowledge gaps and will help ensure that our training courses will be offered in effective educational formats for Oregon’s diverse HCP. Future training will include appropriate triage of potentially infectious patients, respiratory fit testing, and general IPC “train the trainer” sessions. Additionally, we will offer both in-person and remote options.Disclosures: None

A continent-wide effort and solidarity at curbing COVID-19 pandemic: the Africa task force for novel coronavirus (AFTCOR) infection prevention and control technical working group’s experience

A continent-wide Africa Task Force for Coronavirus with its six technical working groups was formed to prepare adequately and respond to the novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Africa. This research in practice article aimed to describe how the infection prevention and control (IPC) technical working group (TWG) supported Africa Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) in preparedness and response to COVID-19 on the continent. To effectively address the multifaceted IPC TWG mandate of organizing training and implementing rigorous IPC measures at healthcare service delivery points, the working group was sub-divided into four sub-groups—Guidelines, Training, Research, and Logistics. The action framework was used to describe the experiences of each subgroup. The guidelines subgroup developed 14 guidance documents and two advisories; all of which were published in English. In addition, five of these documents were translated and published in Arabic, while three others were translated and published in French and Portuguese. Challenges faced in the guidelines subgroup included the primary development of the Africa CDC website in English, and the need to revise previously issued guidelines. The training subgroup engaged the Infection Control Africa Network as technical experts to carry out in-person training of IPC focal persons and port health personnel across the African continent. Challenges faced included the difficulty in conducting face-to-face IPC training and onsite technical support due to the lockdown. The research subgroup developed an interactive COVID-19 Research Tracker on the Africa CDC website and conducted a context-based operation and implementation research. The lack of understanding of Africa CDC’s capacity to lead her own research was the major challenge faced by the research subgroup. The logistics subgroup assisted African Union (AU) member states to identify their IPC supply needs through capacity building for IPC quantification. A notable challenge faced by the logistics subgroup was the initial lack of experts on IPC logistics and quantifications, which was later addressed by the recruitment of professionals. In conclusion, IPC cannot be built overnight nor can it be promoted abruptly during outbreaks of diseases. Thus, the Africa CDC should build strong national IPC programmes and support such programmes with trained and competent professionals.

2352. Analysis of National Infection Prevention and Control Programs on Sepsis Incidence: An Ecological Study

Abstract Background Annually, the World Health Organization (WHO), World Organization for Animal Health, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations jointly administer the Tripartite Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) country self-assessment survey (TrACSS), which asks participating countries to evaluate themselves on their progress in implementing policies to prevent and control AMR. Question 8.1 in the survey asks whether there is a functional national infection prevention and control (IPC) program or plan in human healthcare (question 8.1 in the survey). Our aim was to evaluate whether having an IPC plan correlates with a reduction in a country’s sepsis incidence. Methods We used 2017 estimates of total sepsis incidence per 100,000 people published previously by Rudd et al. We matched this data to a country’s respective response to question 8.1 of the 2016–2017 TrACSS. Table 1 lists the potential answers to question 8.1. Additional details about the survey methodology are available on the WHO TrACSS website. We compared the sepsis incidence in countries where IPC plans were implemented nationwide (answer D or E) to countries that did not implement a nationwide IPC plan (answer A, B, or C). Results 154 countries were surveyed, 140 of which responded to question 8.1 and had available sepsis data. 47 countries (33.6%) had nationwide implementation of IPC plans and 93 (66.4%) did not. Globally, countries who implemented nationwide IPC plans had lower sepsis incidence with less inter-country variability (median: 201, interquartile range [IQR]: 165–272) compared to countries who did not implement an IPC plan (439, IQR: 290–682). (Figure 1). Similar trends were observed when broken down by each individual WHO region (Figure 2). Multivariate Poisson regression adjusting for region found that countries who implemented nationwide IPC plans had a 37.2% (95% CI 35.7–38.9%, p &amp;lt; 0.001) lower incidence of sepsis. The height of the box represents the interquartile range (IQR). The solid line within each box represents the median. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum for each respective group, excluding outliers. Outliers are defined as any data point that is greater or less than 1.5 x IQR from the third or first quartile, respectively. Outliers are depicted as individual data points outside of each box and whiskers. The red box represents countries that answered either a, b, or c. The turquoise box includes countries that answered either d or e. Box plot parameters are similar to that of figure 1. Each pair of red (countries answering a, b, or c) and turquoise boxes (countries answering d or e) represent a different WHO region, as listed on the x-axis. AFRO is the African Region. AMRO is the Region of the Americas. EMRO is the Eastern Mediterranean Region. EURO is the European Region. SEARO is the South-East Asian Region and WPRO is the Western Pacific Region. Conclusion This ecological study suggests that broad implementation of an IPC plan is associated with lower sepsis incidence. Additional time-series analysis and adjusting for gross domestic product would be important next steps to ascertain the true benefit of implementing a national IPC plan on rates of sepsis. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Monkeypox and the dental team

Monkeypox (MPX), a rare zoonotic disease, endemic to some African countries is now spreading in non-endemic regions, including the UK. So far, it has been reported in 93 countries with over 38,000 global cases, although the signs are that the disease may be plateauing in UK. The outbreak was declared a public health emergency of international concern by the World Health Organization (WHO). Monkeypox virus (MPXV), belongs to the family Orthopoxviridae, the same family as the smallpox (variola) virus. Although some features of MPX resemble smallpox, a disease that has been eradicated, the former is far milder with a very few associated fatalities. Usually, the initial signs of MPX appear during its prodrome, as single or multiple macular lesions on the oral mucosa, accompanied by generalized lymphadenopathy, followed by the characteristic macular, papular vesicular rash on the skin that heals with scarring. The major mode of spread of MPX is generally through direct or indirect contact with body fluids or lesion material. Its transmission in the dental clinic environment is unlikely if the standard infection prevention and control (IPC) precautions recommended in the National IPC Manual (NHS England) are adhered to. These include wearing N95 masks, fluid-resistant attire and eye protection. Here, the virology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management and prevention strategies of MPX, with particular reference to dentistry are reviewed. CPD/Clinical Relevance: To describe the epidemiology of the re-emergent monkeypox outbreak, and discuss the management of dental patients who may present with it.

Under the HAI lens: pandemic learning for research priorities for IPC – a call to action

In recent years, international reviews have identified key gaps in the evidence related to core components of infection prevention and control (IPC), and a need for high-quality research in context-specific settings and countries to address this [1]. Indeed, much of the evidence underpinning IPC recommendations is of low quality in vitally important areas, including, but not limited to, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), isolation measures and environmental cleaning. The authors have experience of systematic reviews of the evidence for national and international IPC guidance, both before and during the pandemic in Australia and the UK.

Implementation of surgical site infection surveillance in 16 health facilities in Sierra Leone

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with increased healthcare costs, antibiotic resistance, morbidity, and mortality. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), SSIs account for most healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs). In Africa, up to 20% of women who undergo a caesarean section develop a wound infection. Surveillance has been shown to be an essential component in the overall strategy to reduce SSIs. Methods: Surgical site infection surveillance is being implemented in 16 health facilities in Sierra Leone, with at least 1 from each of the 5 US Census regions: Eastern, Western, Northern, Northwestern, and Southern. These health facilities were selected based on the availability of a dedicated infection prevention and control (IPC) focal person. Women were observed for 30 days after caesarean section. A standardized surgical safety and surveillance checklist including case definitions and observable criteria (eg, purulent drainage, wound abscess, or intentional reopening) was used. Clinical staff were trained to collect data and to conduct in-person and phone interviews with patients on days 3, 7, and 30 after caesarean section. Results: From March 2021 to July 2021, a total of 2,529 women had caesarean sections in 15 health facilities; most occurred in the Northern region (785 of 2,529). Among these 2,529 women, 1,522 (60%) had an SSI surveillance checklist started, and of those 1,522, 632 (42%) had a completed checklist. Health facilities in most of the rural regions, (Eastern, Northwestern, and Southern) had no completed checklists. The overall SSI rate for the 15 health facilities was 3% (70 of 2,529). The Southern region had the highest SSI rate at 50% (35 of 70), but the Western region did not report any SSIs. Of the 70 cases, 49 (70%) were identified through active inpatient surveillance and 21 (30%) were identified through postdischarge surveillance. Conclusions: One of the priorities of Sierra Leone’s National IPC Action Plan is to establish HAI surveillance. Surgical site surveillance is an essential component of HAI surveillance and leads to timely identification so infections can be treated quickly. This study was limited by inadequate data collection and patients lost to follow-up after discharge. However, this study illustrates that surveillance leads to the diagnosis of most SSI cases after caesarean section while patients are still hospitalized. Simple yet effective SSI surveillance can be conducted in LMICs to identify and ultimately treat SSI after caesarean section. More support is needed in rural and smaller facilities for better implementation of SSI surveillance in Sierra Leone.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Achieving Minimum Standards for Infection Prevention and Control in Sierra Leone: Urgent Need for a Quantum Leap in Progress in the COVID-19 Era!

Introduction: Good Infection prevention and control (IPC) is vital for tackling antimicrobial resistance and limiting health care-associated infections. We compared IPC performance before (2019) and during the COVID-19 (2021) era at the national IPC unit and all regional (4) and district hospitals (8) in Sierra Leone. Methods: Cross-sectional assessments using standardized World Health Organizations IPC checklists. IPC performance scores were graded as inadequate = 0–25%, basic = 25.1–50%, intermediate = 50.1–75%, and advanced = 75.1–100%. Results: Overall performance improved from ‘basic’ to ‘intermediate’ at the national IPC unit (41% in 2019 to 58% in 2021) and at regional hospitals (37% in 2019 to 54% in 2021) but remained ‘basic’ at district hospitals (37% in 2019 to 50% in 2021). Priority gaps at the national IPC unit included lack of: a dedicated IPC budget, monitoring the effectiveness of IPC trainings and health care-associated infection surveillance. Gaps at hospitals included no assessment of hospital staffing needs, inadequate infrastructure for IPC and lack of a well-defined monitoring plan with clear goals, targets and activities. Conclusion: Although there is encouraging progress in IPC performance, it is slower than desired in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is urgent need to mobilize political will, leadership and resources and make a quantum leap forward.

Recommendations related to occupational infection prevention and control training to protect healthcare workers from infectious diseases: a scoping review of infection prevention and control guidelines

BackgroundEvents such as the COVID-19 pandemic remind us of the heightened risk that healthcare workers (HCWs) have from acquiring infectious diseases at work. Reducing the risk requires a multimodal approach, ensuring that staff have the opportunity to undertake occupational infection prevention and control (OIPC) training. While studies have been done within countries to look at availability and delivery of OIPC training opportunities for HCWs, there has been less focus given to whether their infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines adhere to recommended best practices.ObjectivesTo examine national IPC guidelines for the inclusion of key recommendations on OIPC training for HCWs to protect them from infectious diseases at work and to report on areas of inconsistencies and gaps.MethodsWe applied a scoping review method and reviewed guidelines published in the last twenty years (2000–2020) including the IPC guidelines of World Health Organization and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These two guidelines were used as a baseline to compare the inclusion of key elements related to OIPC training with IPC guidelines of four high-income countries /regions i.e., Gulf Cooperation Council, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom and four low-, and middle-income countries (LMIC) i.e. India, Indonesia, Pakistan and, Philippines.ResultsExcept for the Filipino IPC guideline, all the other guidelines were developed in the last five years. Only two guidelines discussed the need for delivery of OIPC training at undergraduate and/or post graduate level and at workplace induction. Only two acknowledged that training should be based on adult learning principles. None of the LMIC guidelines included recommendations about evaluating training programs. Lastly the mode of delivery and curriculum differed across the guidelines.ConclusionsDeveloping a culture of learning in healthcare organizations by incorporating and evaluating OIPC training at different stages of HCWs career path, along with incorporating adult learning principles into national IPC guidelines may help standardize guidance for the development of OIPC training programs. Sustainability of this discourse could be achieved by first updating the national IPC guidelines. Further work is needed to ensure that all relevant healthcare organisations are delivering a package of OIPC training that includes the identified best practice elements.

High adherence to national IPC guidelines as key to sustainable VRE control in Swiss hospitals: a cross-sectional survey

BackgroundVancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) are on the rise in many European hospitals. In 2018, Switzerland experienced its largest nosocomial VRE outbreak. The national center for infection prevention (Swissnoso) elaborated recommendations for controlling this outbreak and published guidelines to prevent epidemic and endemic VRE spread. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate adherence to this new guideline and its potential impact on the VRE epidemiology in Swiss acute care hospitals.MethodsIn March 2020, Swissnoso distributed a survey among all Swiss acute care hospitals. The level of adherence as well as changes of infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies in the years 2018 and 2019 after publication of the national guidelines were asked along with an inventory on VRE surveillance and outbreaks.ResultsData of 97/146 (66%) participants were available, representing 81.6% of all acute care beds operated in Switzerland in 2019. The vast majority—72/81 (88%) responding hospitals—have entirely or largely adopted our new national guideline. 38/51 (74.5%) hospitals which experienced VRE cases were significantly more likely to have changed their IPC strategies than those 19/38 (50%) hospitals without VRE cases p = 0.017). The new IPC guidelines included (1) introduction of targeted admission screening in 89.5%, (2) screening of close contacts of VRE cases in 56%, and (3) contact precaution for suspected VRE cases 58% of these hospitals. 52 (54%) hospitals reported 569 new VRE cases in 2018 including 14 bacteremia, and 472 new cases in 2019 with 10 bacteremia. The ten largest outbreaks encountered between 2018 and 2019 included 671 VRE cases, of which most (93.4%) consisted of colonization events, 29 (4.3%) infections and 15 (2.2%) bacteremia.ConclusionWide adoption of this VRE control guideline seemed to have a positive effect on VRE containment in Swiss acute care hospitals over two years, even if its long-term impact on the VRE epidemiology remains to be evaluated. Broad dissemination and strict implementation of a uniform national guideline may therefore serve as model for other countries to fight VRE epidemics on a national level.

Evaluation of infection prevention and control practices in Lassa fever treatment centers in north-central Nigeria during an ongoing Lassa fever outbreak.

Outbreaks of Lassa fever (LF) in Nigeria have become more frequent, with increasing more healthcare worker infections. Prevention of infection is dependent on strict compliance to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in treatment centres where patients are managed. To evaluate IPC practices during an ongoing LF outbreak in the two major tertiary hospitals serving as the referral LF treatment centres in the north-central region of Nigeria. This cross-sectional survey was carried out by the IPC subteam of the National Rapid Response Team of the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) deployed to Plateau State, north-central Nigeria during the 2019 LF outbreak. Information on IPC in these facilities was collected using the NCDC viral haemorrhagic fevers (VHFs) isolation and treatment facility IPC survey tool. Both treatment centres had national VHF IPC isolation guidelines and few health workers had received IPC training. In both centres, there were no clearly demarcated entry points for staff going into clinical areas after putting on personal protective equipment, and there were also no standard operating procedures in place for reporting occupational exposure of staff to infected blood or body fluids in both centres. The LF treatment centers located in Plateau State during the 2019 LF outbreak were not fully implementing the national VHF IPC guidelines. Periodic assessments of IPC are recommended for proper management of cases and effective control of LF in the State.

A user's view of commercial mobile applications designed to measure hand hygiene compliance by direct observation

Mobile applications (apps) that facilitate the measurement of hand hygiene (HH) compliance rates by direct observation (DO) are widely available. Their usefulness for infection prevention and control (IPC) professionals has neither been recently reviewed nor formally assessed. To present a critical analysis of hand hygiene measurement apps. Mobile apps were identified from four sources: PubMed, Apple app store, Google Play app store, Google search engine. Individual apps were then evaluated against a novel scoring system using seven key criteria considered relevant for IPC professionals. These included availability, price, automated data analysis, training requirement, compliance measured against the World Health Organization (WHO) 5 moments of HH, recent updates, and average app store rating. For each criterion, possible scores ranged from zero to two, with a maximum available score of 14 per app. A total of 32 apps were identified of which 13 were suitable for analysis. Only three apps (19%) scored ≥12. Twelve apps (92%) allowed compliance to be measured against the WHO 5 moments of HH. Five apps (38%) were completely free to use, seven apps (54%) allowed for automatic analysis and reporting of HH data and only six apps (46%) had high app store ratings. The current mobile apps available for DO of HH generally scored poorly. In order to make these apps more useful to IPC professionals, they should be user-friendly and require less training prior to use. National IPC organizations should develop core standards for these apps to guide future development.

Gaps in Infection Prevention and Control in Public Health Facilities of Sierra Leone after the 2014-2015 Ebola Outbreak.

Background: High compliance to infection prevention and control (IPC) is vital to prevent health care-associated infections. In the worst 2014–2015 Ebola-affected district in Sierra Leone (Kenema), we assessed (a) average yearly IPC compliance (2016–2018) using a National IPC assessment tool in the district hospital and peripheral health units (PHUs), and (b) gaps in IPC activities, infrastructure and consumables in 2018. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using secondary program data. Results: At the district hospital, compliance increased from 69% in 2016 to 73% in 2018 (expected minimal threshold = 70%; desired threshold ≥ 85%). Compliance for screening/isolation facilities and decontamination of medical equipment reached 100% in 2018. The two thematic areas with the lowest compliance were sanitation (44%) and sharps safety (56%). In PHUs (2018), the minimal 70% compliance threshold was not achieved in two (of 10 thematic areas) for Community Health Centers, four for Community Health Posts, and five for Maternal and Child Health Units. The lowest compliance was for screening and isolation facilities (range: 33–53%). Conclusion: This baseline assessment is an eye opener of what is working and what is not, and can be used to galvanize political, financial, and material resources to bridge the existing gaps.