National Council On Family Relations Research Articles

The secret history of home economics: How trailblazing women harnessed the power of home and changed the way we live. DanielleDreilinger. 2021. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. 348 pp. ISBN: 978‐1324004493. $13.99 Paperback. $9.99 e‐book.

The secret history of home economics: How trailblazing women harnessed the power of home and changed the way we live. DanielleDreilinger. 2021. New York: W. W. Norton &amp; Co. 348 pp. <scp>ISBN</scp>: 978‐1324004493. $13.99 Paperback. $9.99 e‐book.

Reconceptualizing the Domain and Boundaries of Family Life Education

Many scholars have defined family life education (FLE), and some have differentiated it from other family-related fields. example, Doherty (1995) provided a definition of the boundaries between FLE and family therapy; however, we believe those criteria can be improved. We explore the professions of family life education, family therapy, and family case management using the questions why, what, when, for whom, and how? After examining these questions for each role, we introduce the domains of family practice to differentiate among them. The approach defines FLE and encourages appropriate collaboration among the fields. Suggestions are made for using this model for career exploration, reviewing job requirements to assess role consistency and clarity, and for determining the need for and appropriateness of referral and collaboration. Key Words: domains of family practice, family case management, family life education, family therapy, professional development. What is Family Life Education (FLE) and how is it similar to and different from other family-related fields? We begin to answer these questions by sharing the following comments that were among those posted on the Certified Family Life Educator (CFLE) listserv in 2010. They are included to illustrate the struggle experienced by many professionals in the field: am bothered by the correlation of FLE with therapy.... Certainly the two have similarities, but they are not the same. Esther Schiedel, MS, CFLE For years, we have struggled with developing a clear definition for 'Family Life Education.' Amelia Rose, CFLE While there is a difference and there is a boundary that goes up at some point between CFLEs and doing clinical work, I do see room for both to work together. I think it depends on the service itself that is being delivered. Tammy Whitten, LMFT, CFLE While there are some similar topics dealt with in FLE as in clinical work, they are different, should be different and need to be different - What might it look like if CFLEs were part of a team approach to addressing family needs? How would this be done? How would we work to clarify roles and responsibilities [and] respect each profession's contribution to family health? ... I hope that in 10, 25, and 40 years we see both more recognition of our field and a better collaborative approach to family health. Jennifer Best, CFLE These quotes reflect the frustrations of many of us in a developing field and provide the context for this- paper. The field of Family Studies emerged out of a concern in the mid 19th century regarding the abilities of families to address the social problems of their times (Doherty, Boss, LaRossa, Schumm, & Steinmetz, 1993). Family Life Education provided the means by which professionals worked with families to help them learn to solve these problems (Kerckhoff, 1964; Mace, 1971). This work continues. But, what is FLE? more than 50 years family scholars have composed stipulative definitions of FLE, descriptions that define the concept according to the particular author for his or her current purposes regardless of other definitions (Thomas & Arcus, 1992). Authors have provided definitions that focus on individuals, couples, and families; relationship development and maintenance; sexuality; personal development; and so forth. Many continued with the focus on problems and problem solving; however, over the decades, descriptions of FLE have shifted to include and even emphasize prevention of problems within families. More recently, FLE has begun to focus on assisting families in identifying and developing their strengths to meet their potentials (Arcus, Schvaneveldt, & Moss, 1993). Currently, the definition of Family Life Education as accessed on the National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) website for the CFLE program presents the profession's function as using information about healthy family development within a preventive, familysystems perspective in order to teach knowledge and build skills so that individuals and families may function at their optimal levels (National Council on Family Relations, n. …

Imbuing the Study of Family Resource Management with a Global Perspective

Family resource management is a course ripe for inclusion of international approaches and perspectives for a variety of reasons. First, the topic is inherently global; second, family studies students need to be prepared to work with culturally diverse families; and finally, global citizenship is increasingly identified as aim of liberal arts education. This paper suggests strategies and approaches for imbuing family resource management with a global perspective. It may be of interest to faculty teaching family resource management or other family studies courses who wish to integrate a global perspective into their courses. Family resource management is one of the 10 family life education content areas recognized by the National Council on Family Relations (NCFR). Competency in this area is required for certification in family life education. According to NCFR, family resource management involves an understanding of the decisions individuals and families make about developing and allocating resources including time, money, material assets, energy, friends, neighbors, and space to meet their (National Council on Family Relations, 2009). Family resource management includes the study of family goals and values, decision-making processes, and wants and needs. Courses in family resource management are commonly offered at the undergraduate level as a requirement for students in family studies or related programs. The study of family resource management warrants a global perspective because family resource management issues are inherently global and family studies students should be prepared to work with diverse families. Furthermore, imbuing the study of family resource management with a global perspective supports the general movement toward global citizenship as part of universities' liberal arts mission.

The 36th Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition

The 36th Annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Awards Competition was co-sponsored by the National Institute for Media and the Family, Minneapolis, MN. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos for educational and commercial purposes, to endorse excellence in the production of films with themes relevant to family issues, to promote the effective use of these resources, to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities, and to disseminate media competition results. Entries received were placed in one of the following 12 subject categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging Intergenerational Issues; STD/AIDS; Families with Special Needs; Family Violence/Abuse; Human Development Across the Life Span; Marital & Family Issues and Communications; Mental Health, Stress, Transition, Crisis; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality & Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy & Sexuality. Guidelines for submission required that all videos be first-time entries in the competition and carry a release date of no earlier than January 1, 2003. Multiple entries for producer/ distributor within categories were permitted. All entries were received by March 15, 2004. In addition to half-inch videocassette recordings, entries were also submitted on CD-ROM. Judging panels for each entry were comprised of 3 content area specialists in research, education, and community services from across the country. The judges scored each entry in 12 categories covering subject area content, objectives of the producer, audience appeal, accurate information, artistic quality, and production. A 5 point Likert scale was used to assess up to 60 possible points, or a perfect score. A qualitative assessment was also used to obtain an overall rating. The average of the 3 scores was used in determining the outstanding productions. The first place winners listed here are honored for entries in these categories. In addition, recognition is given to the runner-up and honorable mention recipients of each subject category on the basis of numerical rankings of the entries as determined by the above criteria. The following list identifies the first place winners, the runner-up, and the honorable mention recipient of each of the 12 topics. The synopsis, goals, and objectives of each entry provided by the video's producer/director do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the National Council on Family Relations, the competition coordinators, or the judges. Purchase and rental prices are provided courtesy of the producers. The entrants noted their intended audiences. 1. Addiction/Substance Abuse * Winner: Confronting Drunk Driving (27:00). Producer/Distributor: Human Relations Media, 41 Kensico Drive, Mount Kisco, NY 10549. E-mail: orders@hrmvideo.com. Purchase Price: $139.95. Audience: Junior High, High School Synopsis: This video features three stories of teens involved in serious car crashes. Law enforcement officers also explain the legal risks involved in drinking and driving. Also, the program offers important tips about how to avoid being a passenger in a car driven by an intoxicated driver. Goals and Objectives: The purpose of this program is to present to students grades 7-12 the real dangers of driving while intoxicated. * Honorable Mention: Underage Drinking: Know the Facts, Know the Risks (27:00). Producer/Distributor: Human Relations Media, 41 Kensico Drive, Mount Kisco, NY 10549. E-mail: orders@hrmvideo.com. Purchase Price: $139.95. 2. Aging/lntergenerational Issues * Winner: Day of Independence (27:00). Producer/Distributor: Cedar Grove Productions, PO Box 29772, Los Angeles, CA 90029. E-mail: cedarmail@aol.com. Purchase Price: TBD. Audience: General Synopsis: Zip, a young Nisei (second generation Japanese American) baseball pitcher, faces tragic circumstances amidst the internment of 110,000 Americans of Japanese ancestry during World War II. …

The 35th Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition

Key Words: family, media, videos. The 35th Annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Awards Competition was cosponsored by the National Institute for Media and the Family in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The purpose of this annual competition is to evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos for educational and commercial purposes; to endorse excellence in the production of films with themes relevant to family issues; to promote the effective use of these resources; to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities; and to disseminate media competition results. Entries received were placed in one of the following 12 subject categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging/Intergenerational Issues; Contemporary Social Issues; Families with Special Needs; Family Violence/Abuse; Lifespan/Human Development; Marital and Family Relations; Health, Stress, and Crisis; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality, Sex Roles, and Adolescent Pregnancy; and Other (e.g., Public Service Announcements). Guidelines for submission required that all videos be first-time entries in the competition and carry a release date of no earlier than January 1, 2002. Multiple entries for producer/distributor within given categories were permitted, and all entries were received by March 15, 2003. In addition to half-inch videocassette recordings, CD-ROMs also were included. Evaluation Process Judging panels for each entry were composed of three content area specialists from across the country, one each in research, education, and community services. The judges scored each entry in 13 categories covering subject area content, objectives of the producer, audience appeal, accuracy of information, artistic quality, and production. A 5-point Likert-type scale was used, so 65 points reflect a perfect score. A qualitative assessment also was used to obtain an overall rating. An average score was derived from scores provided by the three judges and was used in determining the outstanding productions. The first-place winners listed were entries. Recognition was given to runner-up and honorable mention recipients of each subject category, who received the next highest score. The following summary includes the comments, synopses, goals, and objectives of each entry provided by the video's producer/director and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the National Council on Family Relations, the competition coordinators, or the judges. Purchase and rental prices are provided courtesy of the producers. The entrants noted their intended audiences. 1. Addiction/Substance Abuse * Runner-Up: LifeSteps: Building Character (28:00). Producer: Heartland Media, 4104 24th Street, #128, San Francisco, CA 94114. E-mail: jim@hlmedia.com. Distributor: The Bureau For At-Risk Youth, 135 Dupont Street, Plainview, NY 11803-0760. E-mail: info@guidancechannel.com. Web site: www.guidancechannel.com. Purchase price: $74.95. Audience: High School, Junior High Synopsis: As adolescents grapple with the common problem of friends who make poor choices about substance abuse, viewers learn that character means recognizing the need to make a change and having the courage to do so. Adolescents learn that the key to making good choices is to listen to their consciences and to the feelings they experience when their actions violate their values. Goals and Objectives: LifeSteps is a 12-part series designed to help students develop the social and emotional skills to become responsible, knowledgeable, caring, and successful in life. 2. Aging/Intergenerational Issues * Winner: The Way Home (56:00). Producer: Jessica Martin, 4196 Washington Street, Suite 2, Boston, MA 02131. Distributor: Fanlight Productions, 4196 Washington Street, Suite 2, Boston, MA 02131. E-mail: info@fanlight.com. Web site: www.fanlight.com. Purchase price: $199. Audience: General, Professionals Synopsis: There may be many places people choose to call home, but none of these choices may be as important or as laden with anxiety as the place one chooses to live out the golden years. …

The 34th Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition

34th annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Awards Competition was cosponsored by the National Institute for Media and the Family, Minneapolis, MN. purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos for educational and commercial purposes, to endorse excellence in the production of films with themes relevant to family issues, to promote the effective use of these resources, to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities, and to disseminate media competition results. Entries received were placed in one of the following 14 subject categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging; Contemporary Social Issues; Families With Special Needs; Family Violence/Abuse; Life Span Human Development; Marital and Family Issues and Communication; Mental Health, Stress, Transitions, and Crisis Management; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy and Sexuality, STD/AIDS; and Other (e.g., Public Service Announcements). Guidelines for submission required that all videos be firsttime entries in the competition and carry a release date of no earlier than January 1, 2001. Multiple entries for producer/distributor within categories were permitted. All entries were received by May 1, 2002. In addition to half-inch videocassette recordings, entries were also submitted on CD-ROM. Judging panels for each entry comprised three content area specialists in research, education, and community services from across the country, and 121 entries were reviewed independently. judges scored each entry in 13 categories covering subject area content, objectives of the producer, audience appeal, accurate information, artistic quality, and production. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess up to 65 possible points, or a perfect score. A qualitative assessment was also used to obtain an overall rating. average of the three scores was used in determining the outstanding productions. first place winners listed here are honored for entries in the educational and commercial entertainment categories or a combination of these categories. In addition, recognition is given to the runner-up and honorable mention recipients of each subject category on the basis of numerical rankings of the entries as determined by the criteria described here. following list identifies the first-place winners, the runner-up, and the honorable mention recipient of each of the 14 topics. synopsis, goals, and objectives of each entry provided by the video's producer/director do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the National Council on Family Relations, the competition coordinators, or the judges. Purchase and rental prices are provided courtesy of the producers. entrants noted their intended audiences. 1. Addiction/Substance Abuse * Winner (Educational): And the Sad Will Fall Away (29:00). Producer/Distributor: Beck Sullivan, Center for Child & Family Studies, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. E-mail: Bsullivan@sc.edu. Web site: www.sc.edu/cosw/center/center.html. Purchase Price: $75. Audience: Professionals, Parents (Foster/Adoptive), Community Service Providers Synopsis: And the Sad Will Fall Away is a moving documentary about women, their children, and the effects of substance abuse. It is used to help foster parents understand the cycle and process of addiction by presenting the story of addiction as a complicated, multigenerational legacy. This understanding allows foster parents to empathize with birth parents and helps them better address the needs of the children they are fostering. At the core of the film are the stories of three women at various stages of recovery, which are punctuated by comments from addiction professionals. video contains five segments: We live what we learn, The big lie, The next generation, Recovery? …

The 33rd Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition*

The 33rd Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition* The 33rd annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Competition was hosted by the Department of Family and Child Ecology and the College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, during June and July of 2001. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos, to endorse excellence in the production of films with themes relevant to family issues, to promote the effective use of these resources, to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities, and to disseminate media competition results. Entries received were placed in one of the following 14 subject categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging; Contemporary Social Issues; Families With Special Needs; Family Violence/Abuse; Human Development; Marital and Family Issues and Communication; Mental Health, Stress, Transitions, and Crisis Management; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy and Sexuality; STD/AIDS; and Other (Public Service Announcements). Guidelines for submission required that all videos be firsttime entries in the competition and carry a release date of no earlier than January 1, 2000. Multiple entries for producer/distributor within categories were permissible. All entries were to be received by April 1, 2001. In addition to half-inch videocassette recordings, entries could also be submitted on CD-ROM if available. The judging panels included university faculty, graduate students, and undergraduate students from several academic departments at Michigan State University (e.g., Family and Child Ecology, Psychology) and Michigan State University Extension. A total of 101 entries (99 videotapes and 2 CD-ROMs) were received. Following the viewing of each entry, judges were asked to independently make both quantitative (79 possible points) and qualitative assessments. The evaluation form consisted of four major quantitative categories designed to measure the entries based on (a) content (30 possible points); (b) general issues (9 possible points), which included length, pacing, and flow of media entry; (c) artistic quality (20 possible points); and (d) ability to meet stated goals (20 possible points). This evaluation was followed by an overall rating (the sum of the four categories) and a qualitative section. The winners listed here are honored for entries in the educational and commercial/entertainment categories or a combination of these categories. In addition, recognition is given to the runner-up and the honorable mention recipient for each topic, regardless of categorical grouping, on the basis of numerical rankings of the videos as determined by preestablished criteria. The following list identifies the winner(s), the runner-up, and the honorable mention recipient for each of the 14 topics. The synopsis, goals, and objectives of each entry were provided by the video's producer/director and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the NCFR, the competition coordinators, or the judges. Purchase and rental prices are provided courtesy of the producers. The entrants noted their intended audiences. 1. Addiction/Substance Abuse * Winner (Educational): Spit Tobacco Exposed (15:00). Producer: John G. Young, Human Relations Media, 41 Kensico Drive, Mount Kisco, NY 10549. Distributor: Human Relations Media, 41 Kensico Drive, Mount Kisco, NY 10549. Web site: www.hrmvideo.com. Purchase price: $94.95. Audience: Junior High Synopsis: The video reveals through interviews with users, former users, and cancer patients, that chewing tobacco is a distinctive habit that often causes serious health problems and puts young people at great risk for early disease and death. Stark footage shows some of the devastating damage that spit tobacco does to teeth, gums, and mouths. …

The 32nd Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition*

The 32nd Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition* The 32nd annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Competition was hosted by the Department of Family and Child Ecology and the College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University, during May and June of 2000. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos, to endorse excellence in the production of films with themes relevant to family issues, to promote the effective use of these resources, to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities, and to disseminate media competition results. Entries solicited were placed in 1 of the following 14 categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging; Contemporary Social Issues; Families with Special Needs; Family Violence/ Abuse; Human Development; Marital and Family Issues and Communication; Mental Health, Stress, Transitions, and Crisis Management; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy and Sexuality; STD/AIDS; and other Public Service Announcements. Guidelines for submission required that all videos be firsttime entries to the competition; carry a release date of no earlier than January 1, 1998; and be available for purchase, rental, or loan on a nationwide distribution basis. Multiple entries for producer/distributor within categories were permissible, although only one video was eligible for an award within any given category. All entries, which were to be half-inch videocassette recordings, were to be received by May 15, 2000. Entries could also be submitted on CD-ROM if available. We received 97 entries, including 94 videos and 3 CDROMs. One category (STD/AIDS) did not receive more than three videos this year. All videos within this category were nonetheless reviewed by a full committee and recognized only if they met the criteria of excellence defined by the review committees. Submissions were solicited from commercial and entertainment networks (e.g., Home Box Office [HBO], Discovery Channel), educational institutions and clearing houses (e.g., universities, InJoy, Sunburst), and amateurs (both youth and adults). The judging panels included university faculty, graduate students, and undergraduate students from several academic departments at Michigan State University (e.g., Family and Child Ecology, Journalism, Psychology, Communication) and Michigan State University Extension. Individuals from various community-based organizations in East Lansing also participated in this year's review panels. Following the viewing of each entry, judges were asked to independently make both quantitative (79 possible points) and qualitative assessments. The evaluation form consisted of four major quantitative categories designed to measure the entries based on (a) content (30 possible points); (b) general issues (9 possible points), which included length, pacing, and flow of media entry; (c) artistic quality (20 possible points); and (d) ability to meet stated goals (20 possible points). This was followed by an overall rating, which was the sum of the four categories, and a qualitative section that asked judges for comments on the major strengths and weaknesses, as well as suggestions for improvement. Video production designations (i.e., commercial or entertainment, educational, amateur) were also considered evaluators. Each video was reviewed by at least two judges. In the event of a tie, the videos were evaluated by a third independent reviewer. If a duplicate score was awarded, the videos were honored with a duplicate award. This year's competition marks a departure from previous years in that three winners per category were identified if (a) entries from the three classifications (amateur, commercial or entertainment, and educational) were available and if (b) they were deemed meritorious. Hence, winners are listed honoring educational, amateur, commercial/entertainment entries, or a combination of these categories. …

Thirty-First Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition*

Thirty-First Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition* The 1999 annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Competition was hosted by the Department of Family and Child Ecology and the College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI during June and July of 1999. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos, to endorse excellence in the production of films with themes relevant to family issues, to promote the effective use of these resources, to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities, and to disseminate media competition results. Entries solicited were placed in one of the following 14 categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging; Contemporary Social Issues, Families with Special Needs; Family Violence/ Abuse; Human Development; Marital and Family Issues and Communication; Mental Health, Stress. Transitions and Crisis Management; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy and Sexuality; STD/AIDS; and other Public Service Announcements. Guidelines for submission required that all videos be firsttime entries to the competition. carry a release date of no earlier than January 1. 1997, and be available for purchase, rental, or loan on a nation-wide distribution basis. Multiple entries for producer/distributor within categories were permissible. All entries, which were to be 1/2 videocassette recordings, were to be received by May 15, 1999. Entries could also be submitted on CDROM if available. A total of 101 entries (videotapes) were received; 99 videotapes and two CD-ROMs. Two categories (Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy and Sexuality) did not receive more than three videos this year. In these situations, all videos were nonetheless reviewed by a full committee, and recognized only if they met the criteria of excellence defined by the review committees. The video, The farmer's wife, is receiving special recognition from NCFR this year. This 6-hour PBS documentary was reviewed separately by two different review teams. Both felt it was appropriate for recognition within their respective categories, but it was deemed by two other committees that this might also be an appropriate video in their categories as well. Because of its length, its relation to multiple categories, and overall excellence, a decision was made to single this video out as separate and unique. The judging panels included university faculty, graduate, and undergraduate students from several academic departments at Michigan State University (e.g., Family and Child Ecology, Journalism, Psychology, Communication) and Michigan State University Extension. Individuals from various communitybased organizations in East Lansing, MI also participated in this year's review panels. Following the viewing of each entry, judges were asked to independently make both quantitative (79 possible points) and qualitative assessments. The evaluation form consisted of four major quantitative categories designed to measure the entries based on: (1) content (30 possible points); (2) general issues (9 possible points), which included length. pacing, and flow of media entry; (3) artistic quality (20 possible points); and (4) ability to meet stated goals (20 possible points). This was followed bv an overall rating which was the sum of the four categories, and a qualitative section that asked judges for comments on the major strengths and weaknesses, as well as suggestions for improvement. Each video was reviewed by at least two judges. In the event of a tie, the videos were evaluated by a third independent reviewer. If a duplicate score was awarded, the videos were honored with a duplicate award. The following list identifies the Winner, Runner Up, and Honorable Mention recipients for each of the fourteen categories. …

1998 Thirtieth Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition

Thirtieth Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition* The 1998 annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Competition was hosted by the Department of Family and Child Ecology and the College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University, during June and July of 1998. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos, to endorse excellence in the production of films with themes relevant to family issues, to promote the effective use of these resources, to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities, and to disseminate media competition results. Entries solicited were placed in one of the following fourteen categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging; Contemporary Social Issues; Families with Special Needs; Family Violence/Abuse; Human Development Across the Life Span; Marital & Family Issues & Communications; Mental Health, Stress, Transitions & Crisis Management; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy & Sexuality; STD/AIDS; and other Public Service Announcements. Guidelines for submission required that all videos be firsttime entries to the competition, carry a release date of no earlier than January 1, 1996, and be available for purchase, rental, or loan on a nation-wide distribution basis. Multiple entries for producer/ distributor within categories were permissible. All entries were to be 1/2 videocassette recordings and were to be received by May 15, 1998. Entries could also be submitted on CD-ROM if available. A total of 122 entries (videotapes) were received. All categories except the Public Service Announcements (PSA) received multiple entries. Upon review of this category, the panel of reviewers deemed that no videos were meritorious of recognition. However, the reviewers of the Parenting Issues category deemed that one video-The first years last forever-although entered in the appropriate category and given its exceptional quality was deserving of special recognition. As such, this video was awarded special recognition within the category of PSA. The judging panels included university faculty, graduate, and undergraduate students from several academic departments at Michigan State University (e.g., Family and Child Ecology, Journalism, Psychology, and Communication) and Michigan State University Extension, East Carolina University, and Georgia Southern University. Individuals from various community-based organizations in East Lansing, MI also participated in this year's review panels. Following the viewing of each entry, judges were asked to independently make both quantitative (79 possible points) and qualitative assessments. The evaluation form consisted of four major quantitative categories designed to measure the entries based on: (1) content (30 possible points); (2) general issues (9 possible points), which included length, pacing, and flow; (3) artistic quality (20 possible points); and (4) ability to meet stated goals (20 possible points). This was followed by an overall rating that was the sum of the four categories and a qualitative section that asked judges for comments on the major strengths and weaknesses, as well as suggestions for improvement. Each video was reviewed by at least two judges. In the event of a tie, the videos were evaluated by a third independent reviewer. If a duplicate score was awarded, the videos were honored with a duplicate award. The following list identifies the Winner, Runner Up, and Honorable Mention recipients for each of the fourteen categories. The synopsis, goals, and objectives of each entry were provided by the producer/director and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NCFR, the competition coordinators, or the judges. Purchase and rental prices are provided courtesy of the producer. Intended audiences were noted by the entrant. …

Twenty-Eighth Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition

Twenty-eight Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition* Francisco A. Villarruel,** Gloria Gonzalez-Kruger, Daniel F. Perkins, Yolanda Sanchez, June Pierce Youatt, Esther Onaga, Marsha Carolan, Beverly Schroeder, and Marjorie J. Kostelnik The 1996 Annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Competition was hosted by the Department of Family and Child Ecology and the College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University, during May and June of 1996. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos, endorse excellence in the production of films with themes relevant to family issues, to promote the effective use of these resources, to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities, and to disseminate media competition results. Entries solicited were placed in one of the following 15 categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Health Issues: Infancy, Adolescence, & Adult; Contemporary Social Issues; Families with Special Needs; Family Violence/Abuse; Human Development Across the Life Span; Human Reproduction & Family Planning; Marital & Family Issues & Communications; Mental Health, Stress, Transition, & Crisis Management; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality & Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy & Sexuality; STD/AIDS; and Other (e.g., PSAs). Guidelines for submission required that all videos be first-time entries to the competition, carry a release date of no earlier than January 1, 1994, and be available for purchase, rental, or loan on a nation-wide distribution basis. Each producer/distributor could submit only one entry per category. All entries, which were to be 1/2 videocassette recordings, were to be received by April 15,1996. A total of 100 entries (videotapes) were received. The judging panels included university faculty, graduate, and undergraduate students from several academic departments at Michigan State University, Michigan State University Extension, and faculty and students from the Department of Human Development and Family Studies at the University of Nevada-Reno. Individuals from various community based organizations in East Lansing, MI also participated in this year's review panels. No entries were received for the Human Reproduction and Family Planning category. Following the viewing of each entry, judges were asked to independently make both quantitative (79 possible points) and qualitative assessments. The evaluation form consisted of four major quantitative categories designed to measure the entries based on: (1) content (30 possible points); (2) general issues (9 possible points), which included length, pacing, and flow of the media entry; (3) artistic quality (20 possible points); and (4) ability to meet stated goals (20 possible points). This was followed by an overall rating that was the sum of the four categories and a qualitative section that asked judges for comments on the major strengths and weaknesses, as well as suggestions for improvement. Each video was reviewed by at least two judges. In the event of a tie, the videos were evaluated by an independent third reviewer. If a duplicate score was awarded, the videos were honored with a duplicate award. The following list identifies the Winner, Runner Up, and Honorable Mention recipients for each of the fifteen categories. The synopsis, goals and objectives of each entry was provided by the producer/director and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of NCFR, the competition coordinators, or the judges. Purchase and rental prices are provided courtesy of the producer. Intended audiences are noted in the following manner: PG for primary grades, JH for junior high, HS for high school, C for college, G for general, P for parents, and PRO for professionals. An additional category is other, as specified by the entrant. 1. …

1995. Twenty-Seventh Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition

Francisco A. Villarruel, Kathleen G. Zawacki, Ronald J. Wilson, Yolanda Sanchez, June Pierce Youatt, Daniel F. Perkins, Marjorie J. Kostelnik, and Harriette P. McAdoo The 1995 annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Competition was hosted by the Department of Family and Child Ecology and the College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University, during May and June of 1995. The purpose of the annual competition is to (a) evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos, (b) endorse excellence in the production of films with themes relevant to family issues, (c) promote the ef fective use of these resources, (d) encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities, and (e) disseminate media competition results. Entries solicited were placed in one of the following 15 categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging; Contemporary Social Issues; Families with Special Needs; Family Violence/Abuse; Human Development Across the Life Span; Human Reproduction and Family Planning; Marital and Family Issues and Communications; Mental Health, Stress, Transition, and Crisis Management; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy and Sexuality; STD/AIDS; and Other (e.g., Public Service Announcements). The categories Human Development Across the Life Span and Other were combined because of the low number of submissions within each of these categories, leaving a total of 14 categories for the competition. Guidelines for submission required that all videos be first-time entries to the competition, carry a release date of no earlier than January 1, 1994, and be available for purchase, rental, or loan on a nationwide distribution basis. Each producer/distributor could submit only one entry per category. All entries, which were to be 1/2 videocassette recordings, were to be received by March 15, 1995. A total of 107 entries (videotapes) were received. The judging panels included university faculty, graduate, and undergraduate students from several academic departments at three Michigan universities: (a) Michigan State University and Michigan State University Extension, (b) the Department of Consumer Resources and Technology at Western Michigan University, and (c) Central Michigan University. Following the viewing of each entry, each judge was asked to independently make both quantitative (79 possible points) and qualitative assessments. The evaluation form consisted of four major quantitative categories designed to measure the entries based on: (a) content (30 possible points); (b) general issues (9 possible points), which included length, pacing, and flow; (c) artistic quality (20 possible points); and (d) ability to meet stated goals (20 possible points). This section was followed by an overall rating that was the sum of the four categories and a qualitative section that asked judges for comments on the major strengths and weaknesses, as well as suggestions for improvement. The following list identifies the Winner, Runner Up, and Honorable Mention recipients for each of the 14 categories. The synopsis, goals, and objectives of each entry were provided by the producer/director and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NCFR, the competition coordinators, or the judges. Purchase and rental prices are provided courtesy of the producer. Intended audiences are noted in the following manner: PG for primary grades, JH for junior high, HS for high school, C for college, G for general, P for parents, and PRO for professionals. An additional category, Other, was specified by some of the entrants and is indicated with a brief description of the intended audiences. 1. Addiction/Substance Abuse * WINNER: Women of Substance (29:55 minutes). Producer: Robin Smith and Rory Kennedy, 1077 30th St., Washington, DC 20007. Distributors: Third World Newsreel, 335 West 38th St., New York, NY 10018; and CorVision, 1359 Barclay Blvd. …

1994: Twenty-Sixth Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition

The 1994 annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Competition was hosted by the Department of Family and Child Ecology and the College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University, during April and May of 1994. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate the quality and conceptual content of videos; endorse excellence in the production of videotapes, filmstrips, and films with themes relevant to family issues; promote the effective use of these resources; encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities; and disseminate media competition results. Entries solicited were placed in one of the following 15 categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging; Contemporary Social Issues; Families with Special Needs; Family Violence/Abuse; Human Development Across the Life Span (no entries); Human Reproduction and Family Planning (no entries); Marital and Family Issues and Communications; Mental Health, Stress, Transition, and Crisis Management; Diverse Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy and Sexuality; STD/AIDS; and Other (e.g., Public Service Announcements ). Guidelines for submission required that all videos be first-time entries to the competition, carry a release date of no earlier than January 1, 1992, and be available for purchase, rental, or loan on a nationwide distribution basis. Each producer/distributor could submit only one entry per category. All entries, which were to be 1/2 videocassette recordings, were to be received by March 15, 1994. A total of 104 entries were received (videotapes). No entries were received for two categories: Human Development Across the Life Span and Human Reproduction and Family Planning. The judging panels included university faculty, graduate, and undergraduate students from several academic departments at Michigan State University, the Michigan State University Extension, faculty and students from the Department of Consumer Resources and Technology at Western Michigan University, and practicing professionals from the greater Lansing, Michigan community. Following the viewing of each entry, each judge was asked to independently make both quantitative (79 possible points) and qualitative assessments. The evaluation form consisted of four major quantitative categories designed to measure the entries based on: (a) content (30 possible points); (b) general issues (9 possible points), which included length, pacing, and flow of media entry; (c) artistic quality (20 possible points); and (d) ability to meet stated goals (20 possible points). The form also contained a qualitative section that asked judges for comments on the major strengths and weaknesses, as well as suggestions for improvement. The following list identifies the Winner, Runner-Up, and Honorable Mention recipients for each of the fifteen categories. The synopsis of each entry was provided by the producer/director and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of NCR, the competition coordinators, or the judges. Intended audiences are noted in the following manner: PG for primary grades, JH for junior high, HS for high school, C for college, G for general, P for parents, and PRO for professionals. WINNERS BY CATEGORY 1. ADDICTION/SUBSTANCE ABUSE * WINNER: Lifestories: Families in Crisis: Dead Drunk: The Kevin Tunell Story (30 minutes). Producer: Frank Doelger & Howard Meltzer, Turtleback Productions, 270 Lafayette Street, Suite 610, New York, NY 10012. Distributor: Ambrose Video Publishing, 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, MI 10104. Purchase Price: $69.95. AUDIENCE: JH, HS, P. SYNOPSIS: Based on a true story, this video dramatizes the details and aftermath of a New Year's accident in which 17-year-old, Kevin Tunell crashed his car into that of an 18-year-old girl, killing her instantly. It concludes with an appearance by the real Kevin Tunell, who warns viewers about the dangers of driving while drunk, as well as his sense of invincibility that contributed to his decision to drive while intoxicated. …

1993-Twenty-Fifth Annual National Council on Family Relations Videotape Competition

The 1993 annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Videotape Competition was hosted by the Home Economics Department, College of Applied Science and Technology, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois from March 15 to April 2, 1993. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate quality and endorse excellence in the production of videotapes with themes relevant to family issues, to promote the effective use of these resources, and to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities. Entries solicited were placed in one of the following 16 categories: Addiction/Substance Abuse; Aging; Contemporary Social Issues; Divorce/Remarriage; Families with Special Needs; Family Violence/Abuse; Human Development Across the Life Span; Human Reproduction and Family Planning; Marital and Family Issues and Communications; Mental Health, Stress, Transitions and Crisis Management; Non-Traditional Family Systems; Parenting Issues; Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Teenage Pregnancy and Sexuality; STD/AIDS; and Other, which emphasized public policy this year. The following entry guidelines were imposed by NCFR: Submissions were to be first-time entries to the competition, carry a release date no earlier than January 1, 1991, and be available for purchase, rental, or loan on a nation-wide basis. Each producer/distributor could submit only one entry per category. All entries, which were to be 1/2 videocassette recordings, were to be received by March 1, 1993. One hundred and fourteen (114) entries were received. Although producer/distributors identified the category for their entry, the competition director reserved the right to modify categories or to change the category of an entry. No entries were received for the Divorce/Remarriage category. For each category, a panel of appropriate judges was selected from a pool of nearly 40 interested volunteers. Included in this pool were university faculty, staff, and students (graduate and undergraduate); public school teachers and counselors; social service agency staff; family and individual counselors/therapists; Cooperative Extension Service specialists and 4-H youth staff; clerics; practitioners working in domestic and drug abuse programs; hospital gerontologists; local AIDS task force members; and law enforcement professionals. After viewing an entry in a particular category, each judge on the panel was asked to independently make both quantitative and qualitative assessments of the videotape. The evaluation form allowed for numerical ratings on the basis of content (40 possible points), artistic quality (20 points), and the degree to which stated goals and intended audience were matched (20 points). Additionally, the form asked for the judge to provide a qualitative analysis of the major strengths and weaknesses/limitations of each entry. When more than one judge viewed an entry at the same time, they often concluded the rating process with a brief discussion of their assessment. Generally, the videotapes were required to receive an average minimum score of 67 out of 80 to be declared a Category Winner or Runner-Up; therefore, not every category had a winner. An average minimum score of 60 was necessary to be awarded Honorable Mention status. The following listing identifies the Winner, Runner-Up, and Honorable Mention recipients by category. The goals, objectives, and synopsis of each entry were provided by the producer/director and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NCFR, the competition director, or the judges. Intended audiences are noted in this manner: PG for primary grades, JH for junior high, HS for high school, C for college, G for general, P for parents, and PRO for professionals. WINNERS BY CATEGORY 1. ADDICTION/SUBSTANCE ABUSE * Winner: Boy Wonder (28 minutes). Producer: Forefront Productions, 609-402 West Pender Street, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6B 1T6. Distributor: Bureau for At-Risk Youth, 79 Carley Avenue, Huntington, NY 11743. …

1992: Twenty-Fourth Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition

The 1992 annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Competition was hosted by the Illinois Council on Family Relations (ICFR), during April 1992. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate quality and endorse excellence in the production of videotapes, filmstrips, and films with themes relevant to family issues; to promote the effective use of these resources; and to encourage high standards in the development of creative lcarning opportunities.

Professional Role Identity and Variations in the Descriptive Profile and Organizational Attitudes of National Council on Family Relations Members

In Spring 1991, the National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) conducted a membership survey. Based on these data and framed through a symbolic interaction perspective, this article explores variations in the demographic profile and organizational attitudes of three professional role identity groups that are specified in the NCFR mission statement: educators, researchers, and practitioners. The results demonstrate wide variation in the profile and attitudes of these three groups. In the context of an increasingly competitive marketplace of professional associations and high tumover rates among members in NCFR, it is concluded that professional role diversity involves both opportunities and challenges for NCFR, and represents a possible integrative and unifying theme for the organization. Professional associations, like the National Council on Family Relations (NCFR), are formed by individuals to accomplish certain educational, training, and professional objectives best met by collective action. The ultimate success of any voluntary group or organization depends upon achieving several interrelated tasks (Schein, 1985). First, it must develop a sense of mission that is shared by its members. Second, it must derive a set of objectives that are logically derived from this mission, and develop a working consensus among members about these objectives and their importance. Third, it must develop agreement among its members about the mechanisms and strategies for achieving its objectives, and devise procedures for monitoring and evaluating the success of the organization in achieving them. Fourth, it must maintain a high level of system integration and member morale to fulfill its mission, to achieve its objectives, and to sustain itself over time.

1990: Twenty-Second Annual National Council on Family Relations Media Awards Competition

Julie Anson, Judy Brenholt, Bruce Cunningham, Anne Frantz-Cook, Sandra Gill, Bette Hanson, Jan Hare, Judy Herr, Priscilla Huffman, Judy Jax, Candace Jordan, Jan Keil, Leslie Koepke, Yvonne Libby, Marian Marion, Judith Rommel, Robert Salt, Denise Skinner, Nancy Van Beest, John Williams, and Karen Zimmerman** The 1990 annual National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Media Competition was hosted by the Human Development, Family Living and Community Educational Services Department, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, Wisconsin, the week of April 9-13, 1990, for the videotape entries and April 30-May 4, 1990, for filmstrip and film entries. The purpose of the annual competition is to evaluate quality and endorse excellence in the production of videotapes, filmstrips, and films with themes relevant to family issues, to promote the effective use of these resources, and to encourage high standards in the development of creative learning opportunities. Entries solicited were placed in onq of the following 12 categories: Human Development Across the Life Span; Parenting Issues; Nontraditional Family Systems; Marital and Family Issues and Communication; Sexuality and Sex Role Development; Abuse/Addiction; Human Reproduction and Family Planning; Stress, Transition, and Crisis Management; Contemporary Social Issues; Families with Special Needs; Abuse and Neglect; Sexuality. NCFR entry guidelines included: Submissions must be first-time entries to this competition and must carry a release date no earlier than January 1, 1988. All entries must be nationally available for purchase, rental, or loan. Producer/distributors may submit only one entry per competition category in each format-A maximum of one videocassette, one filmstrip, and one film per category. Acceptable formats were: 1/2 videocassette, 35mm sound filmstrip (or filmstrips captioned with audiocassette or record), 16mm optical sound. A total of 110 entries were received (98 videotapes and 12 films or filmstrips). Although producer/distributors selected the category for their entry, competition coordinators reserved the right to modify categories or to change the category of an entry. You will note two changes from last year: Category 6 was renamed Substance Abuse/Addiction and a Category 12, Teenage Sexuality, was created, due to the significant number of entries in this area. In a change from previous judging procedures, videotapes were judged separately from films and filmstrips. All entries in a given category were evaluated by the same panel of judges to ensure an equitable judging process. The judging panel included university faculty and students (graduate and undergraduate), media specialists, parents, family services staff, family and individual counselors, social workers, public health nursing staff, and professionals working in the area of child abuse and neglect. Following the viewing of each entry, each judge independently completed an evaluation form on the entry. The evaluation form allowed for numerical ratings on the basis of content (20 possible points), artistic quality (20 possible points), and matching stated goals (20 possible points). Media were required to receive an average minimum score of 51 points (85%) to be declared Category Winner or RunnerUp and an average minimum score of 45 points (75%) to be awarded Honorable Mention status. The following listing indicates Winners, Runners-Up, and Honorable Mentions by category in both videotape and filmstrip/film format. The synopsis of each entry was provided by the producer/director and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of NCFR, the competition coordinators, or the judges.

Should Family Life Education Be Required for High School Students?: An Examination of the Issues

This paper is an outgrowth of the National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) concern for effective public policy and was commissioned to examine the number 1 priority issue from the 1983 Public Policy Survey: Requiring high school students to take a course in family life 88% of the NCFR members responding to this survey agreed with this issue while 12% disagreed. This paper reviews and critiques the scholarly literature relevant to this issue and examines the major arguments both for and against requiring high school students to take a course in family life education. The Gallup Opinion Polls reported that in 1978 77% approved of the teaching of sex education in the high schools. Numerous surveys have indicated that many schools offer little or no family life education and that what is offered is often an elective for students. Family life education has been purported to have both positive and negative impacts on student knowledge attitudes and behaviors. Findings suggest that while family life education and sex education may not accomplish all of the goals established by the proponents of such education neither does it have the negative impact perceived by the opponents. There is also little evidence to answer empirical questions concerning the values dimension of family life education. It is clear that empirical and philosophical investigation of the question will be a continuing need.