National Comprehensive Cancer Network Research Articles

Outcomes of a universal germline screening program in a community urology practice.

The role of germline genetic testing in urologic oncology has expanded in recent years. However, implementation of genetic testing in community practices remains a challenge, often due to limited access to qualified genetics trained providers. In this study, we report outcomes of a universal germline screening program in a community urology practice. Between November 2021 and September 2022, all patients referred for urology clinic visits at Frederick Health (Frederick, MD, USA) were provided an online genetics screening questionnaire prior to the visit. Responses were compared against National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for germline testing. Those who met criteria were provided educational materials at the end of the questionnaire, and then counseled by a trained urologic oncologist (HC) in the clinic or referred to a genetic counselor prior to testing. Testing was performed with a 36-gene pan-cancer panel (CancerNext) or a 14-gene targeted prostate cancer panel (ProstateNext), with or without additional RNA analysis (RNAinsight) (Ambry Genetics, CA, USA). Demographic and clinical parameters, as well as genetic testing results, were retrospectively collected under IRB approval. In the study period, 765 patients were seen over 1370 clinic visits. Of these, 505 patients (66.0%) completed the screening questionnaire. The majority were completed via email (54.5%) with the remainder (45.5%) via text message. Of the patients who completed screening, 125/505 (24.7%) met NCCN criteria for germline testing. 58/125 patients (46.4%) who met criteria underwent germline testing, of whom 5/58 (8.6%) had distinct pathogenic mutations identified. These included actionable mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2, as well as an additional pathogenic mutation in NBN. Variants of unknown significance were identified in 8/58 patients (13.8%) in 11 total genes. Challenges to implementation of this program included meeting institutional requirements for genetic testing consent, facilitating specimen collection in clinic, and integration of results into the electronic health record. Genetic risk assessment for high-risk individuals is feasible as part of a universal screening program in a community urology practice. Approximately 8% of tested patients were found to have pathogenic germline mutations, which is consistent with contemporary tertiary referral cohorts.

Should All Patients With Stage IE Gastric Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma Receive Antibiotic Eradication Therapy for Helicobacter pylori?

H. pylori eradication therapy (HPE) can lead to tumor regression in H. pylori-positive (HPP) gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. However, some patients do not have detectable H. pylori (HP) infection (H. pylori-negative [HPN]) and the guidelines differ in their initial approach to HPN patients. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends proceeding to radiation therapy, whereas European Society for Medical Oncology suggests HPE for every patient, even those who are HPN. To address this issue, we evaluated the effectiveness of HPE in limited-stage gastric MALT lymphoma. We retrospectively reviewed patients newly diagnosed with stage IE gastric MALT lymphoma between January 2002 and December 2022. The primary outcome was the complete remission (CR) rate defined as no macroscopic findings of lymphoma and negative gastric biopsy at the follow-up gastric endoscopy. Fifty-two patients were reviewed, and HP infection was detected in 19 (36.5%) patients-14 by immunostaining, three by serology, and one each by stool antigen and urea breath test. All 19 HPP and eight of the 33 HPN patients received HPE treatment. The CR rate was 63% (12/19) in HPP patients and 13% (1/8) in HPN patients (P = .033). After a median follow-up of 89.7 months, only two of the 12 HPP patients achieving CR have relapsed; the one HPN patient who received HPE remains in CR at 12+ months. For limited-stage HPP gastric MALT lymphoma, HPE is an effective and durable first-line treatment and should be used. For HPN patients, the CR rate with HPE is very low in our experience and is thus in support of the NCCN guideline.

Abstract PO5-10-08: Clinical Value of Molecular Targets and Genome-Targeted Cancer Therapies Recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for Advanced Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: Genomic testing has expanded the possibilities of precision cancer medicine, particularly for advanced, treatment-resistant breast cancer cases. However, the clinical significance of most genetic alterations remains uncertain, potentially overestimating tailored therapies. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines are evidence-based cancer-specific recommendations used in clinical practice and that are often determinative for insurance coverage. In this study, we assessed the validity of the targets and the clinical benefit of genome-targeted cancer drugs recommended in the NCCN guidelines for metastatic breast cancer. Methods: We identified genome-targeted oncology therapies supporting advanced breast cancer recommendations in the most recent NCCN breast cancer guideline (version 4.2023). Genome-targeted drugs were defined as involving use of a genomic test in which the drug targeted a genomic alteration. We analyzed data from trials supporting advanced genome-targeted breast cancer drugs recommendations. When multiple (or overlapping) articles for the same study were identified, the most recent publication was included. We extracted key details of each trial, including trial design, blinding, phase of clinical trial and primary efficacy end points. We cross-referenced the FDA-approved indications as of 30 June 2023 with the NCCN recommendations for each drug. Strength of evidence supporting molecular targetability was evaluated using the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT). Clinical benefit for genome-targeted oncology therapies was assessed using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). We considered a substantial clinical benefit as a grade of 4 or 5. Molecular targets qualifying for ESCAT category level I-A and I-B associated with substantial clinical benefit by ESMO-MCBS were rated as high-benefit genomic-targeted breast cancer treatments. Results: We identified 47 recommendations supporting 17 genome-targeted drugs, which targeted 11 driver alterations. Out of these recommendations, 29 (62%) aligned with the FDA indications. We associated 47 trials with these recommendations, most randomized (24, 51%), phase 3 (23, 49%) and open-label (42, 89%). The most common primary endpoint (22, 47%) was overall response rate, followed by progression-free survival/time to progression (21, 45%). Twenty-four trials (51%) had a I-A ESCAT targetability, 7 (15%) had a I-B targetability, 6 (13%) had a I-C targetability score and 10 (21%) were categorized as II-B. ERBB2 amplification, germline BRCA1/2 mutations, PIK3CA mutations, and ESR1 mutation were mainly classified as tier I-A based on randomized trials demonstrating the effectiveness of approved targeted therapies in patients with these alterations. By contrast, RET fusions, NTRK fusions, high-tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability were ranked as tier I-C and somatic BRCA mutations, germline PALB2 mutations and HER-2 mutations as II-B. Six trials (14%, 6/42) supporting drug approval demonstrated substantial ESMO-MCBS clinical benefit. Overall, 6 recommendations (14%) had high-benefit genomic-based cancer treatments. Conclusions: Fewer than one-fifth of molecular-targeted cancer therapies recommended in NCCN guidelines for metastatic breast cancer demonstrated substantial patient benefits. Value frameworks like ESCAT and ESMO-MCBS can help stakeholders identify therapies with the greatest potential. Citation Format: Ariadna Tibau, Thomas J. Hwang, Jerry Avorn, Aaron Kesselheim. Clinical Value of Molecular Targets and Genome-Targeted Cancer Therapies Recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for Advanced Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-10-08.

Abstract PO2-25-12: Production of a bespoke muscle resistance exercise (MRE) programme for use in a future clinical trial, following a detailed patient engagement program (PEP) in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC)

Abstract Background: MRE investigations in early breast cancer have been undertaken but there has been little evaluation in ABC. Cancer guidelines suggest the use of physical activity, including MRE, to improve fatigue (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2.2020; European Society of Medical Oncology 2020) but improvement in other outcomes in ABC is less clear. In clinical trials, adherence to exercise intervention has been a challenge and has hampered investigation of other outcomes and little data exists evaluating the possible reasons for this poor adherence and compliance. In preparation for an exercise component as part of lifestyle intervention trial in ABC, a PEP was undertaken to evaluate an on-line web-based exercise program. Results would support continued usage of the program or creation of a new program. Methods: A commercially available program was used containing a library of exercises created for multiple disease types. There was no voice over. Using an exercise science professional, 2 sets of muscular resistance exercise programmes were created (A &B), selecting exercises for upper and lower limb major muscle groups. Set A and B differed , with A involving younger leaner demonstrators and B older, less lean. Volunteers were asked to view the sets and complete a survey. The results of the survey, involving 21 volunteers of which 43% were over 60 years and presented previously, indicated that the following main modifications were needed to a program: use of demonstrators similar to patient's habitus and use of a voice-over to guide exercises. A short test video was produced incorporating these and other visual changes and viewed by a focus group of four volunteers. Results: The focus group concluded that the new visual and audio changes would allow them to more easily perform the exercises and increase the likelihood of compliance compared to the on-line program. The group advised involvement of a more diverse demonstrator group and further improvements to the voice-over. A professionally produced video has now been made with all the above changes. Conclusions: This PEP indicates that is necessary to review exercise programmes with patients and not assume they are all suitable for use in clinical trials. We believe a PEP of this kind with the resultant bespoke video is the first produced involving patients with ABC. This video will now be evaluated in a much larger diverse PPE which will help the development of a national UK clinical trial of exercise in ABC. Citation Format: Amanda Clarke, Jennifer Glendenning, Glen Davison, Catherine Harper-Wynne. Production of a bespoke muscle resistance exercise (MRE) programme for use in a future clinical trial, following a detailed patient engagement program (PEP) in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-25-12.

Abstract PO4-08-02: Genetic testing among patients with triple-negative breast cancer at a single health system: a quality improvement project

Abstract Background: Breast cancer is the most common type and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Approximately 15-20% of patients have triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at diagnosis. TNBC is aggressive, difficult to treat, prone to relapse, and associated with an increased mortality rate. The incidence of BRCA1/2 mutation is about 20% in patients with TNBC (Hartman et al. 2012). Despite the high prevalence of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes among TNBC patients, many do not received genetic counseling (GC) or genetic testing (GT). National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines now recommend GT for all patients with TNBC, regardless of age, especially after the approval of Poly Adenosine diphosphate Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for targeted therapy against BRCA1/2 mutations. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to identify patients with TNBC who did not receive GT and design an intervention to understand potential barriers to receiving GC and GT. Methods: We implemented a QI project to identify previously diagnosed adult patients with TNBC (18 years and older) of any stage (early or advanced/metastatic) without prior GT or family history of genetic disorders with active follow-up at the Henry Ford health breast cancer clinic. Eligible patients diagnosed between January 2015 and January 2020 from the Syapse Learning Health Network database were included. Baseline information as well as additional data including demographics, breast cancer treatment details, and whether GT and/or GC was offered or not was obtained through electronic health record review after institutional review board committee approval. Bi-monthly meetings were held amongst breast cancer providers, genetic counselors, and nurse navigators to develop an intervention to contact the patients who did not undergo GT and/or GC. After obtaining the list of patients who did not undergo GT and/or GC despite meeting eligibility criteria, they were contacted by their primary breast cancer providers via telephone regarding their willingness to obtain GT and/or GC at this time and participate in a questionnaire-based interview to understand barriers towards the same. Results: In the 5 years, a total of 123 patients were noted to have been diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer. Of these, 93 patients were actively being followed at the Henry Ford breast clinic at the time of the QI project. 2 of the 9 patients who underwent GT and GC were positive for BRCA1/2 mutation. Of the remaining 83 patients that did not receive GC or GT, 65 (78.3%) had no clear reason explained in the chart, 27 patients (32.5%) chose not to get tested, 23 (27.7%) were not deemed to be eligible upon initial assessment and 4 (4.8%) had pending orders placed by breast surgeons upon initial diagnosis. Unfortunately, 29 of these 83 patients were noted to have been deceased when the intervention was being designed. Remaining 54 patients were contacted by their primary breast cancer oncologists to determine their willingness in participating in the questionnaire-based interview. Conclusion: Based on the results of our QI project, we have now developed a process to contact the identified patients and renew the offer for GT and GC as well as participation in a questionnaire-based interview to understand the potential barriers to testing. We also plan to improve physician education and awareness by conducting mini sessions during our annual symposium meetings as well as grand rounds and develop a protocol for ordering GT and GC in patients with TNBC at our institution. Citation Format: Manasi Godbole, Mary Nyhuis, Travis Washburn, Joann Hirth, Haythem Ali. Genetic testing among patients with triple-negative breast cancer at a single health system: a quality improvement project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-08-02.

Abstract PO1-09-03: Clinical Impact of Multigene Panel Testing in Patients with a Personal or Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer Previously Negative for BRCA1/2 Genes

Abstract Rapid developments in cancer genetics and hereditary cancer risk assessments have enabled the identification of individuals at elevated risk for hereditary malignancies to guide enhanced cancer screening and prevention efforts. Multigene panel testing has emerged as the standard approach as emphasized in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of other pathogenic mutations identified through multigene panel testing in individuals who previously tested negative for germline BRCA1/2 and assess the clinical impact of panel testing. Patients either previously diagnosed with breast cancer or with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer that had also been seen by Oncology Genetics at a single institution and tested negative for BRCA1/2 genes but had not undergone prior multigene panel testing were invited via a letter to return for an additional genetic counseling visit to discuss multigene panel testing. Patients were also able to opt-in to a survey component of the study and received an email to fill out the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) and Cancer Worry Scale (CWS). Surveys were completed prior to the initial genetic counseling appointment and repeated after discussion of the multigene panel test results. A total 24 women met with a genetic counselor of which 22 (92%) had a personal history of breast cancer, 1 (4%) had a family history of breast cancer, and 1 (4%) had a family history of ovarian cancer. The mean age was 52.6 years (range, 42-68) and 100% of women were Caucasian. Of the 24 women, 17 (71%) completed multigene panel testing. Of the women that underwent testing, 7 (41%) had negative results, 6 (35%) had variants of unknown significance (VUS), and 4 (24%) had a pathogenic mutation identified in another gene (CDKN2A, CHEK2, and CFTR). There was no significant change in MICRA or CWS scores after multigene panel results were reviewed in the 9 patients that completed both pre- and post-genetic testing surveys. The mean/median summary MICRA scores pre- and post-counselling were 30 (SD 12.4), median 26 (min 18, max 56), and 21.2 (SD 15.4), median 21 (min 3, max 43), respectively (p=0.19, Wilcoxon signed ranks test). The mean/median summary CWS scores pre- and post-counselling were 14.3 (SD 5), median 15 (min 7, max 24), and 13.6 (SD 2.59), median 14 (min 10, max 17), respectively (p=0.53, Wilcoxon signed ranks test). Of the 4 patients with newly identified pathogenic mutations, 2 started new screening protocols and 1 underwent a prophylactic mastectomy. In conclusion, multigene panel testing identified pathogenic mutations in a subset of individuals who previously tested negative for BRCA1/2 genes leading to changes in clinical management. The completion of multigene panel testing did not lead to a significant increase in MICRA or CWS scores. Key limitations of this study include a small sample size and an all Caucasian population. Citation Format: Devon Miller, Stephanie Pritzl, Angela Tess, Jessica Gooding, Lisa Barroilhet, Lori Dubenske, Kari Wisinski. Clinical Impact of Multigene Panel Testing in Patients with a Personal or Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer Previously Negative for BRCA1/2 Genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-09-03.

Abstract PO4-10-07: Understanding Psychological distress in patients prior to breast cancer diagnosis:Mixed Methods Study

Abstract Purpose:While the association between diagnosis of breast cancer and post-diagnosis psychological distress has been well documented, data regarding pre-diagnosis psychological distress in the breast cancer population are limited. The purpose of the current study is to measure the distress levels of patients prior to breast cancer diagnosis, to identify the categories of distress they have, and describe the experience of distress of patients before diagnosis. Methods: This study uses a mixed research method of cross-sectional survey and qualitative interviews. In the quantitative part, a cross-sectional survey of 118 patients with completed breast biopsies awaiting pathological diagnosis was conducted using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s (NCCN’s) Distress Thermometer(DT) and Problem List (PL), In the qualitative part, 15 patients were invited using convenient and purposive sampling. Data was collected using a semi-structured face-to-face interview and recorded. The transcribed text was analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method. Results: The results reveal that 63.6% of patients reported a higher level of psychological distress (n=75, scoring≥4).Most patients had emotional (98%) or physical (64%) problems. Among these, worry or anxiety (47.5%), fear (33.1%), finances (21.2%), sadness and depression(18.6%), and grief or loss(15.3%) were the most frequently reported problems. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the factors associated with psychological distress before the diagnosis of breast cancer patients were age, education level. The experience of patients before diagnosis emerged five themes: Very high psychological distress index; Strong uncertainty; The demand of information; Guilt for the family; Hoped for psychological support from the health care team. Conclusions: Psychological distress is prevalent prior to breast cancer diagnosis and may merit early intervention. Understanding patients’ distress may help guide future psychosocial needs assessments and interventions to promote patient quality of life. Table 1 Sample characteristics (n=118). Table 2 Univariate analysis of predictors associated with psychological distress Table 3 The binary logistic regression model of psychological distress Citation Format: Yan Gao, Jinnan Gao. Understanding Psychological distress in patients prior to breast cancer diagnosis:Mixed Methods Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-10-07.

Abstract PO5-27-01: Comparison between the 7th and the 8th edition of TNM Staging System of American joint committee on Cancer(AJCC) for Breast Cancer Patients, diagnosed and treated at King Abdulaziz Medical City

Abstract Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different biological and molecular characteristics that affect local recurrence, metastases, prognoses, and response to available therapies. The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for breast cancer has incorporated the biological and molecular characteristics, tumor grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor status(Her-2)and tumor grade, into the traditional anatomical 7th edition that only considers tumor size, lymph nodes status, and distant metastases. The aim of this study is to compare the 7th to 8th editions of the AJCC staging system for prognostic impact, assess the effect of the new edition on the treatment and treatment outcome Method A retrospective cohort study was performed for all breast cancer patients, diagnosed between (2013 -2019) and underwent upfront surgery at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC).Patients’ clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, surgical, therapeutic, and follow-up data were retrieved. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate analysis using Fisher's exact test was used to compare staging systems' prognostic accuracy. Multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with disease outcome Results A total of 169 female patients were included, the 8th AJCC staging system resulted in a reallocation of 108 (63.9%) of the patients to a different stage group. The majority were downstaged(60.9%) while only 3% were upstaged, most of the upstaged patients had a triple-negative subtype (80%). The change in overall stage for the 8th edition was most significant in stage I (an increase by 140.3%), followed by stage II (downstaged by 74.3%) and stage III (downstaged by 49.7%) compared to the 7th edition. Critically 42.8% of all downstaged patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were found to have received unnecessary chemotherapy after applying the 8th AJCC staging system as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines recommendations. The 8th AJCC staging system was a better prognostic predictor of disease survival, patients in 8th AJCC stage 3 had a higher tendency to develop metastases and die because of their disease (P-value 0.03, 0.051, respectively). Conclusions: Our comparison revealed that the AJCC 8th edition staging system is superior and more comprehensive than the 7th, in term of prognostic value, and in defining the precise adjuvant therapy Figure 1 Comparison of the 7th AJCC and the 8th AJCC staging system Citation Format: Nafisa Abdelhafiez, Abdulmohsen Alkushi, Lolwah Alriyees, Mohammad Arabi, Faris Alsalamah, Emad Masuadi, Ahmad Omair, Mohammad Alkaiyat, Hussam Shehata. Comparison between the 7th and the 8th edition of TNM Staging System of American joint committee on Cancer(AJCC) for Breast Cancer Patients, diagnosed and treated at King Abdulaziz Medical City [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-27-01.

Abstract PO1-11-01: Effectiveness of Susan G. Komen’s national telehealth patient navigation model in reaching underserved populations and reducing cancer-related distress

Abstract Background: Despite its effectiveness in reducing breast cancer inequities, patient navigation (PN) is not accessible to all patients across the United States. To improve access, Susan G. Komen established a telehealth PN model, scaled to deliver PN services equitably across the country. Methods: Patients are referred to Komen patient navigators through Komen’s Helpline. Navigators conduct an initial distress screening and barrier assessment and create an individualized care plan. This information, recommended interventions, and other health data are documented, 62 days. Navigators communicate via the patient’s preferred method: phone, email, text, or video. A patient satisfaction survey is administered 30 days after the start of navigation. Results: From April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023, 1,092 individuals were navigated. Navigation was provided throughout the continuum of care, including screening and diagnosis through treatment. Of the 3,064 barriers identified by patients, 63% were economic, 20% related to emotional health, 11% indicated lack of access to care and 6% related to care management. Eleven percent of individuals selected Spanish as their preferred language, 84% had a household income at or below 200% of the Federal Poverty Level and 24% were uninsured. Navigated individuals identified as: 46% Black or African American, 37% white or Caucasian, 20% Hispanic or Latino, 2% Asian, and 14% preferred not to answer. The average patient age was 54 years old, ranging from 20 to 101 years old. 588 patients identified as being diagnosed with breast cancer, with 69% diagnosed as early stage (Stage 0-III), 22% as metastatic (Stage IV), and 8% undesignated. Distress screening is administered, within the domains established by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, at intake, major transitions in care and end of navigation. Average distress across all domains was 6.1 on an 11-point scale at first observation (a score of 10 indicating the highest level of distress). Financial distress was the highest average (7.5) followed by emotional distress (6.6). During navigation enrollment, financial distress decreased 14% and emotional distress decreased 14%. Survey respondents reported: the Komen navigation program helped them: follow their treatment plan (91%), will help them continue their care (92%), feel more prepared to talk with their care team (91%), to be able to get care faster (88%), and improve their quality of life (91%). Conclusion: Distress screening was developed for a clinical setting with in-network medical and mental health providers. This program’s demonstrates distress screening can be adapted for use in a non-clinical, virtual setting. Socioeconomic, survey, and distress data indicate Komen’s model succeeded in reaching people that research shows have numerous barriers to breast health services and cancer care, and overcome the most common barriers, thus improving access to timely, high-quality care. Opportunities for program improvement include: -To improve support for those experiencing high emotional distress, additional training in emotional support is being incorporated into onboarding and Komen’s Navigation Training Program. - Research shows that navigation is most effective when delivered by someone who shares a lived experience, so the diversity of navigators is important. More bilingual navigators have been added to the program to better serve the Spanish-speaking population. - To improve support of those living with metastatic breast cancer seeking navigation support, Komen has launched a research study to identify the unique needs of patients living with MBC, and use this information to enhance navigation services. Citation Format: Julie McMahon, Shelby Lautner, Mandy Spadine, Toni Lee, Janet Okamoto. Effectiveness of Susan G. Komen’s national telehealth patient navigation model in reaching underserved populations and reducing cancer-related distress [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-11-01.

Abstract PO1-11-10: Use of a standardized tool for the evaluation and treatment of cancer related cognitive impairment (chemo-brain) among breast cancer patients

Abstract There is a steep linear increase in patients surviving a cancer diagnosis. Clinical solutions that address the high prevalence of cancer-related treatment effects (CRTE) are urgently needed. A stark example of this need is the dearth of screening and treatment programs for cancer related cognitive impairment (CRCI) (colloquially called “chemo-brain”). Up to 75% of cancer patients report neurocognitive changes that leave patients unable to cope with the expectations of employers, colleagues, families, and friends. The prevalence of neurological disorders is 275% higher among adult cancer patients, when compared to an adult cancer-free population. For many adolescent and young adult cancer patients, the onset of CRCI occurs during "cognitive prime time"; a time when individuals are pursuing education, careers, and raising families. To address a gap in CRTE we have implemented a virtual multi-disciplinary intervention to measure and treat CRCI. Our CRCI intervention follows National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines for CRCI. These guidelines indicate a multi-disciplinary approach with emphasis on increasing physical activity levels, cognitive-behavioral therapy, memory adaptive training, mood management, and sleep optimization. Our approach also follows recent ASCO guidelines for nutrition counseling. Our CRCI program utilizes medical oncologists, physician assistants, mental health therapists, registered dietitians, and occupational therapists. A nationally validated patient reported outcome (PRO) measurement, analysis, and reporting platform informs clinical treatment pathways, monitors patient progress, guides clinical decision making, and improves patient/provider communication. Using health status measures for CRCI, and following American Cancer Society and ASCO guidelines, patients are risk-stratified into three personalized cancer survivor care pathways: 1) low-complexity patients; 2) medium-complexity patients; and 3) high-complexity patients. Low-complexity patients baseline PROs score in the normal range, medium-complexity patients are those who score below the norm (moderate to large effect size difference from normal), and high-complexity patients are those who score well below the norm (greater than larger effect size difference from normal). Low-complexity patients are enrolled into a self-management and continuation of care program. Medium-complexity patients are enrolled into a shared care program. High-complexity patients are enrolled into an acute care program. All three clinical pathways include continued risk-factor vital-sign surveillance. Nearly 100% (99%) of patients who enroll in our primary cancer survivor care program complete our PRO baseline (N=80). From a convenient sample of breast cancer patients (N=42), provisional results of patient-specific segmentation analyses reveal a nearly perfect bell-shaped curve, with 51% of the population classified within the definition of medium-complexity and even split of outliers (high-complexity 24% and low-complexity 24%). Additionally, of all patients in our primary cancer survivor care program who completed at least three measurement time points for health status measures of cognitive impartment (N=38), 92% had a positive experience, 71% had a clinically significant improvement in cognitive health, 21% had a no change in cognitive status, and only 8% had a decline in cognitive health. If these data, and PRO implementation approach hold true, this program could be scaled to national and international cancer survivor population suffering from CRCI. Citation Format: John Librett, Mark Kosinski, Gregory Litton. Use of a standardized tool for the evaluation and treatment of cancer related cognitive impairment (chemo-brain) among breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-11-10.

Abstract PO2-08-01: Universal Multi-Gene Panel Testing of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients in a Community Healthcare System

Abstract Introduction Multi-gene panel, germline genetic testing has emerged over the last decade as a useful tool in the assessment of hereditary cancer syndromes. As barriers to genetic testing are reduced, offering universal genetic testing to all cancer patients is a practice gaining traction. We present outcomes data specific to the offering of universal, multi-gene panel testing to newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in a community hospital setting. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients (n=1005) at a community hospital between 8/5/2019 and 8/5/2022. Uptake and outcomes of genetic counseling and genetic testing were assessed. All patients were offered genetic counseling, and those who consented to genetic testing were offered a multi-gene panel (37-93 genes). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic (2020) guidelines were utilized to distinguish which patients met traditional genetic testing criteria. Results Of all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, 915 (91.1%) patients underwent genetic counseling and 871 (86.7%) patients elected for genetic testing. Of those who declined genetic testing (n=134), 39 (29.1%) reported previous genetic testing. Of patients tested, 489 (56.1%) met NCCN criteria. Overall, 114 (13.1%) of tested patients received results with likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) variants. Of those, 86 (75.4%) had a clinically significant variant, a high-risk, moderate-risk or another dominantly inherited gene variant, while 28 (24.6%) were identified as genetic carriers; Table 1 summarizes genes with LP/P variants in this cohort, with 10 patients receiving results for 2 variants. Of the patients with clinically significant genetic results, 58 (67.4%) met NCCN criteria. Furthermore, 65 patients (75.6%) reported a family history of cancer relevant to the identified LP/P variant. The average age of the total population, and of those with a positive result, was 62 years. While nearly 19% of all patients tested were under age 50, patients under 50 comprised only 14.0% (n=12) of patients with a clinically significant result. Breast cancer management changes, including addition of a PARP inhibitor to chemotherapy regimen and/or elected bilateral mastectomies in the setting of unilateral disease, were noted in 71.4% (n=20) of patients with high-risk genetic findings and 20.6% (n=7) of patients with moderate-risk genetic findings. Conclusion The 86.7% uptake of genetic testing suggests implementation of universal testing in a community setting is feasible and favored by patients. Clinically significant genetic results would have gone undetected in 32.6% of patients if NCCN criteria was strictly utilized to offer testing. In addition to the 62 patients with high and moderate risk genetic results, utilization of expanded panel testing provided benefit for an additional 24 patients found to have an actionable variant in a gene that would not have been detected on traditional breast cancer panels. Our data supports the offering of genetic testing to all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, regardless of age, family history, or other criterion, to inform precise breast cancer management and overall, lifetime cancer risks. Genetic Findings of Universal Multi-Gene Panels in a Community Setting Citation Format: Natalie Johns, Jody Wallace, Darbey Raible, Jordan Brady, Grace Miller, Brooke Phillips. Universal Multi-Gene Panel Testing of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients in a Community Healthcare System [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-08-01.

Abstract PO3-08-06: Challenges in Implementing Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Insights from the First 1000 Families Assessed in a Public University Hospital in Argentina

Abstract Introduction: Integrating genetic testing into breast cancer patients care is crucial for personalized treatment recommendations, risk reduction strategies, and family members evaluation. However, Argentina faces several concerns in implementing these services. Objective: This study aims to explore the challenges encountered in implementing genetic testing for breast cancer, drawing insights from the assessment of the first 1000 patients at a public university hospital in Argentina. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent genetic counseling in our institution from January 2015 to June 2023. We also analyzed patients who underwent surgery from June 2022 to May 2023. Results: 1032 patients were evaluated in our unit. 836 patients (81%) met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing. Genetic testing was requested for 575 patients (68.7%) Only 44% of patients were able to access the test, with 60% receiving only the BRCA1/2 test (see Table 1 and 2 for details). In the analysis of breast cancer surgeries (n=246), 62% (n=154) met the NCCN criteria for genetic testing. However, only 56% of these patients underwent genetic counseling prior to their surgery and only 15 (9.86%) received their results before primary treatment. Discussion Unfortunately, only 9.8% of patients have the results of genetic testing prior to their primary treatment, indicating a critical need for timely referrals and mainstream genetic testing. To counteract, our university hospital's breast cancer unit has taken proactive measures since January 2015. Genetic counseling has been established as a standard of care for all patients, and a streamlined workflow has been implemented to optimize referrals. Trained professionals, including a genetic counselor, psycho-oncologist, and geneticist, have been integrated into core teams. Additionally, healthcare professional continued education has played a pivotal role in improving referrals. Additionally, we have introduced an easy workflow to optimize referrals to genetic counseling. Completion rate of requested genetic tests is concerning, with 56% of tests not being completed, and 60% of the completed tests limited to BRCA1/2. Improving access to genetic testing is imperative. Currently, comprehensive genetic testing is inaccessible to patients without medical coverage, and even those with coverage face difficulties in testing access. Moreover, patient education plays a vital role in promoting the importance of genetic testing and its impact on patient care and their families. In collaboration with the Argentinean Breast Pathology Society, we have developed two informative videos that reinforce knowledge provided by primary care physicians and breast surgeons. Conclusion, Our study is the first in Argentina to analyze the numerous challenges faced in conducting genetic testing for breast cancer in a public hospital. By addressing these challenges collectively, we can facilitate the effective integration of genetic counseling and testing into routine practice for breast cancer patients in Argentina. Table 1: Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Unit Patients (2015-2023) Table 2: Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Unit Patients studies (2015-2023) Citation Format: Dolores Mansilla, Diana Bequelman, Jorgelina Cavallero, Hernan Ursino, Berman Gaston, Ipiña Martin, Eduardo Armanasco, Andrea Aguilar, Valeria Caceres, Eugenia Azar. Challenges in Implementing Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Insights from the First 1000 Families Assessed in a Public University Hospital in Argentina [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-08-06.

Abstract PO5-08-01: Investigating the Link between APC I1307K Mutation and Breast Cancer in Arab Population

Abstract Background: Identifying asymptomatic individuals with an increased risk of hereditary breast cancer may significantly enhance early detection and prevention strategies and may inform treatment decision of patients who carry such variants. The APC I1307K missense mutation is known to be unrelated to conditions such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated FAP, or gastric adenocarcinoma. However, individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry who carry this variant, have increase risk of colon cancer compared to the general population. The association of this variant with other cancer types, such as breast cancer, and in individuals of other ancestries, like Arabs, remains unknown. In this study, we investigate the potential association between APC gene (I1307K variant) and breast cancer risk. Method: Over a course of 18 months, all newly diagnosed patients with solid tumors were offered to participate in a universal germline genetic screening study, utilizing a standard 21-gene or an investigational 84-gene panel testing. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the 153 patients within the study group who carry the APCI1307K missense variant irrespective of cancer type. Patients were classified as meeting the criteria or not meeting the criteria of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) v.1.2020. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and our institutional cancer registry. Descriptive statistics test was employed. Results: Among the screened cancer patients (n=3400), 153 (4.5%) were tested positive for the APC I1307K missense mutation are included in this analysis. Median age at cancer diagnosis was 52 (range,19-80) years, and 99 (64.7%) were female. Breast cancer was the most common primary tumor (n=67, 43.8%) followed by colorectal (n=38, 24.8%), lung (n=7, 4.6%) and pancreatic cancer (n=6,3.9%). Among the 67 breast cancer patients included, 16 (23.9%) were not eligible for genetic testing as per the NCCN guidelines, and were tested as part of the universal genetic testing study. Among the patients with breast cancer, 53 (79.1%) had screening colonoscopy and 9 (17.0%) were found to have polyps (range, 1-3); 8 (88.9%) were low-grade dysplasia, while the other 44 (83.0%) had completely normal colonoscopy. On the other hand, among the 38 patients with colorectal cancer, 21 (55.3%) had tumors presenting as polyps, or exhibited concomitant polyps (range, 1-3), or displayed abnormalities in the background that were polypoid in nature. Notably, 24 (63.2%) of patients with colorectal cancer, have a family history of breast cancer. Conclusions: APC I1307K variant is unexpectedly common among our cohort of Arab patients. Individuals who carry this variant may face an elevated risk of developing breast cancer; potentially contributing to hereditary and familial cases, and such patients are at higher risk for colorectal cancer, too. Citation Format: Baha' Sharaf, Hira Bani Hani, Anas Zayed, Maha Barbar, Ahmad Hushki, Rashid Abdel-Razeq, Mohammad Titi, Reem Al-Halalsheh, Suleiman Mahafdah, Hikmat Abdel-Razeq. Investigating the Link between APC I1307K Mutation and Breast Cancer in Arab Population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-08-01.

Abstract PO5-08-08: Tumor Registry Guided Genetic Testing: Opportunities Unlocked

Abstract Introduction With the expansion of guidelines for germline genetic testing, more patients are eligible for testing. Unfortunately, many remain untested. Testing is critical, as patients with pathogenic variants (and their families) can benefit from more aggressive screening and preventative strategies, as well as targeted therapies (e.g., poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors) if cancer does occur. Objectives To study the prevalence of Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) genetic testing eligibility and uptake among cancer patients from the tumor registry at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) in order to identify a group of living patients who require testing now. Methods This Quality Improvement study included patients 18 years of age or older diagnosed with breast, ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal, pancreas and prostate cancers between 1991 and 2021 as reported to the MUSC Tumor Registry. Each patient was evaluated using the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for breast-ovarian genetic testing (Excluding family history criteria, which were not available in the tumor registry). Using our genetic testing database, we also determined which had had testing. We describe the prevalence of genetic testing performed vs the number of patients that would benefit from testing under the newest guidelines. Results Patients identified as eligible for testing included 399 breast cancer patients, all 544 ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer patients, all 1534 pancreas cancer patients and 872 prostate cancer patients. Reported testing of eligible patients was low (breast: 35%, Ovarian: 33%, pancreas: 4%, and prostate cancer: 6%). Of eligible patients not tested, 310 patients with breast cancer, 343 patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer, 717 patients with pancreas cancer and 763 patients with prostate cancer, are alive and eligible for testing (2133 patients) Discussion Using Tumor Registry data plus genetic testing data allowed us to detect a large number of living patients with cancer that would be eligible for HBOC genetic testing. This is despite the fact that this approach underestimates the number of patients that would benefit from further testing as it does not include family history and other factors. A similar approach for colorectal or other cancers will yield additional patients. Conclusion Most cancer patients eligible for breast ovarian genetic testing have not been tested. There is an opportunity to use Tumor Registry and genetic testing data to identify a large number of living patients who can be approached for testing. As we showed in our study, by adopting updated cancer genetic testing guidelines, there is increased opportunity to detect more patients that would benefit from such testing. In our study this benefit is shown especially in the prostate and pancreas cancer groups. Next steps will be to determine how best to notify and make testing available to these patients. Table 1. Testing Status Comparison Assessing Genetic Testing Rates Using Tumor Registry Among Eligible Patients with Breast, Ovarian/Fallopian/Primary Peritoneum, Pancreas and Prostate cancer as per the New Testing Guidelines Citation Format: Kevin Hughes, Antoine Finianos, Kiersten Meeder. Tumor Registry Guided Genetic Testing: Opportunities Unlocked [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-08-08.

Abstract PO5-26-01: Assessing the effect of multimodal therapy in massive fungating breast cancers without distant metastasis

Abstract Background: Massive fungating breast cancers (MFBCs), which comprise exudative, foul-smelling tumors, the size of a child’s head or involve extensive ulceration are classified as locally advanced breast cancers. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer without distant metastases. However, limited evidence is available regarding the successful treatment of fungating breast cancers. In clinical practice, many fungating breast cancer cases are treated as stage IV tumors. This study aimed to investigate whether multimodal therapy, including surgery for giant breast cancers, can improve survival rates and whether the survival rates are comparable to those of other stage III breast cancers. Subjects and methods: Out of 1480 cases of primary breast cancer diagnosed at our hospital between June 2012 and March 2020, 123 patients with clinical stages IIIA–IIIC were chosen for analysis. Furthermore, 29 of these patients with MFBC were selected. During multimodal therapy for selected patients with fungating breast cancer, difficulties were encountered in some patients with single-stage skin suturing and closure after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These patients underwent surgery with an additional skin flap or skin grafting. Furthermore, radiation therapy was added as needed. We compared the survival rates of these patients with those of patients who received drug therapy only according to the therapeutic protocol for Stage IV. Survival rates of patients with MFBC and other stage III breast cancers were also compared. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Kaplan–Meier curve and the log-rank test. Results: Of the 29 patients with MFBC, 22 (75.9%) and seven (24.1%) were treated with multimodal and palliative therapies, respectively. The median age and follow-up period of the multimodal therapy group were 62 (range: 43–94) years and 67 (range, 32–131) months, respectively. The corresponding values for the palliative therapy group were 79 (range: 42–88) years and 31 (range: 2–96) months. All patients in the palliative treatment group were hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative, and treatment with hormone therapy was initiated. The 7-year survival rate was significantly higher in the multimodal therapy group than in the palliative treatment group (92.3% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.0317). Furthermore, the 5-year distant recurrence-free rate was higher in the multimodal treatment group (79.3% vs. 63.5%). Local recurrence did not occur in any patient in the multimodal treatment group. There was no significant difference in the 7-year survival rates between patients with MFBC and those with other stage III breast cancers (86.8% vs. 75.3%; p = 0.239). Triple-negative breast cancer accounted for 20.8% (20 96) of the other stage III breast cancers, but none of these were MFBCs. Conclusions: Clinically, MFBCs are often palliatively treated as stage IV tumors, even in the absence of distant metastasis. However, the survival rate was significantly higher in the multimodal therapy group than in the palliative treatment group. Furthermore, the survival and distant recurrence-free rates for MFBC were higher than those for other stage III breast cancers. Therefore, patients with MFBCs should be actively treated using curative treatments. Citation Format: Tamaki Tamanuki, Maki Namura, Tomoyoshi Aoyagi, Haruhito Sakata, Mika Iwai, Shinichirou Shimizu, Hiroshi Matsuzaki. Assessing the effect of multimodal therapy in massive fungating breast cancers without distant metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-26-01.

Is there any difference between Eastern and Western clinical practice guidelines in management of gastric cancer?

Gastric cancer (GC) has been known as one of the most common causes of cancer mortality both in Western and Eastern countries. However, there might be differences between how it is managed in different countries. Thus, we aimed to investigate these differences. The most well-known clinical guidelines in field of GC management including Korean GC Association (KGCA), Japanese GC Association (JGCA), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), and National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE) have been reviewed. The contents of these guidelines were categorized under eight headings including (1) genetic predisposition, (2) prevention, (3) management of gastric polyp, atrophy, dysplasia and metaplasia, (4) diagnosis, (5) pathology and molecular biology, (6) treatment, (7) supportive and palliative care, and (8) follow up. Difference in each section was discussed. Considering KGCA and JGCA as Eastern and NCCN, ESMO, BSG, and NICE as Western guidelines, it is revealed that both sets of guidelines share common practices such as prioritizing comprehensive diagnostic evaluations, personalizing treatment plans, and palliative care. However, main differences can be seen in treatment regimens, the adoption of newer therapies like immunotherapy, and the utilization of emerging techniques such as HIPEC. These differences reflect the diverse clinical landscapes, research focuses, and healthcare systems within these regions.

Long-term follow-up results of multiparametric prostate MRI and the prognostic value of PI-RADS: a single-center retrospective cohort study

We aim to examine the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) for suspected prostate cancer (PCa), specifically based on their initial Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categories and various clinical factors. Our secondary aim is to evaluate the prognostic value of the PI-RADS through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group distribution. This research was conducted as a single-center retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 1,359 cases having at least one histopathological examination after the initial mp-MRI and/or adequate clinical/radiological follow-up data were included in the clinically significant PCa (cs-PCa) diagnosis-free survival analysis. Initial mp-MRI dates were accepted as the start of follow-up for the time-to-event analysis. The event was defined as cs-PCa diagnosis (International Society of Urological Pathology ≥2). Patients who were not diagnosed with cs-PCa during follow-up were censored according to predefined literature-based criteria at the end of the maximum follow-up duration with no reasonable suspicion of PCa and no biopsy indication. The impact of various factors on survival was assessed using a log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression. Subsequently, 394 cases diagnosed with PCa during follow-up were evaluated, based on initial PI-RADS categories and NCCN risk groups. Three main risk factors for cs-PCa diagnosis during follow-up were an initial PI-RADS 5 category, initial PI-RADS 4 category, and high MRI-defined PSA density (mPSAD), with average hazard ratios of 29.52, 14.46, and 3.12, respectively. The PI-RADS 3 category, advanced age group, and biopsy-naïve status were identified as additional risk factors (hazard ratios: 2.03, 1.54-1.98, and 1.79, respectively). In the PI-RADS 1-2 cohort, 1, 3, and 5-year cs-PCa diagnosis-free survival rates were 99.1%, 96.5%, and 93.8%, respectively. For the PI-RADS 3 cohort, 1, 3, and 5-year cs-PCa diagnosis-free survival rates were 94.9%, 90.9%, and 89.1%, respectively. For the PI-RADS 4 cohort, 1, 3, and 5-year cs-PCa diagnosis-free survival rates were 56.6%, 55.1%, and 55.1%, respectively. These rates were found to all be 24.2% in the PI-RADS 5 cohort. Considering the 394 cases diagnosed with PCa during follow-up, PI-RADS ≥4 cases were more likely to harbor unfavorable PCa compared to PI-RADS ≤3 cases (P < 0.001). In the PI-RADS 3 subgroup analysis, a low mPSAD (<0.15 ng/mL2) was found to be a protective prognostic factor against unfavorable PCa (P = 0.005). The PI-RADS category has a significant impact on patient management and provides important diagnostic and prognostic information. Higher initial PI-RADS categories are associated with decreased follow-up losses, a shorter time to PCa diagnosis, increased biopsy rates, a higher likelihood of developing cs-PCa during follow-up, and a worse PCa prognosis. Combining mPSAD with PI-RADS categories could enhance diagnostic stratification in the identification of cs-PCa.

Contemporary Diagnosis of Very Low-risk Prostate Cancer in a Multihospital Health Care System

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) very low risk (VLR) category for prostate cancer (PCa) represents clinically insignificant disease, and detection of VLR PCa contributes to overdiagnosis. Greater use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomarkers before patient selection for prostate biopsy (PBx) reduces unnecessary biopsies and may reduce the diagnosis of clinically insignificant PCa. We tested a hypothesis that the proportion of VLR diagnoses has decreased with greater use of MRI-informed PBx using data from our 11-hospital system. From 2018 to 2023, 351/3197 (11%) men diagnosed with PCa met the NCCN VLR criteria. The proportion of VLR diagnoses did not change from 2018 to 2023 (p = 0.8) despite an increase in the use of MRI-informed PBx (from 49% to 82%; p < 0.001). Of patients who underwent combined systematic and targeted PBx and were diagnosed with VLR disease, cancer was found in systematic PBx regions in 79% of cases and in targeted PBx regions in 31% of cases. When performing both systematic and targeted PBx, prebiopsy MRI-based risk calculators could limit VLR diagnosis by 41% using a risk threshold of >5% for Gleason grade group ≥3 PCa to recommend biopsy; the reduction would be 77% if performing targeted PBx only. These findings suggest that VLR disease continues to account for a significant minority of PCa diagnoses and could be limited by targeted PBx and risk stratification calculators. Patient summaryWe looked at recent trends for the diagnosis of very low-risk (VLR) prostate cancer. We found that VLR cancer still seems to be frequently diagnosed despite the use of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans before biopsy. The use of risk calculators to identify men who could avoid biopsy and/or biopsy only for lesions that are visible on MRI could reduce the overdiagnosis of VLR prostate cancer.

Development of palliative care clinical practice guidelines and referral care pathways for primary care practitioners in Pakistan

BackgroundDespite a large burden of life-limitingillness, there exists a dearth of services of palliative care in Pakistan. International guidelines have questionable applicability in Pakistan due to the socioeconomic differences. We generated a protocol describing the process of developing comprehensive palliative care guidelines and palliative care referral pathways for primary care practitioners to adopt in Pakistan.MethodsA GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach with modification has been employed to create guidelines for a Pakistani context. The “National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Insights: Palliative Care, Version 2.2021” was used as the source guideline. Recommendations from the source guideline were reviewed by two local palliative care specialists to either “Adopt,” “Adapt” or “Exclude”. The finalized recommendations were incorporated into the local palliative care guideline. Clinical diagnosis and referral pathways were made from the finalized guideline. Any gaps in management found in the pathways were filled by taking existing recommendations from other credible guidelines.ResultsTwenty-seven recommendations were adopted without modification. No recommendations were deemed to be adapted and 15 were excluded. The referral care pathways created were reflective of the local guideline and included elements of initial assessment, preliminary management, reassessment, and referral. 6 additional recommendations were made.ConclusionThe described clinical practice guidelines and primary care clinical referral pathways will aid to standardize palliative care provision in Pakistan. These can be used by other resource constrained settings to develop guidelines within their own local context.

Deep learning image reconstruction of diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluation of prostate cancer focusing on its clinical implications.

Image-based assessment of prostate cancer (PCa) is increasingly emphasized in the diagnostic workflow for selecting biopsy targets and possibly predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Assessment is based on Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) which is largely dependent on T2-weighted image (T2WI) and diffusion weighted image (DWI). This study aims to determine whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can improve the image quality of DWI and affect the assessment of PI-RADS ≥4 in patients with PCa. In this retrospective study, 3.0T post-biopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 70 patients with PCa in Korea University Ansan Hospital from November 2021 to July 2022 was reconstructed with and without using DLR. Four DWI image sets were made: (I) conventional DWI (CDWI): DWI with acceleration factor 2 and conventional parallel imaging reconstruction, (II) DL1: DWI with acceleration factor 2 using DLR, (III) DL2: DWI with acceleration factor 3 using DLR, and (IV) DL3: DWI with acceleration factor 3 and half average b-value using DLR. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured by one reviewer, while two reviewers independently assessed overall image quality, noise, and lesion conspicuity using a four-point visual scoring system from each DWI image set. Two reviewers also performed PI-RADSv2.1 scoring on lesions suspected of malignancy. A total of 70 patients (mean age, 70.8±9.7 years) were analyzed. The image acquisition time was 4:46 min for CDWI and DL1, 3:40 min for DL2, and 2:00 min for DL3. DL1 and DL2 images resulted in better lesion conspicuity compared to CDWI images assessed by both readers (P<0.05). DLR resulted in a significant increase in SNR, from 38.4±14.7 in CDWI to 56.9±21.0 in DL1. CNR increased from 25.1±11.5 in CDWI to 43.1±17.8 in DL1 (P<0.001). PI-RADS v2.1 scoring for PCa lesions was more agreeable with the DL1 reconstruction method than with CDWI (κ value CDWI, DL1; 0.40, 0.61, respectively). A statistically significant number of lesions were upgraded from PI-RADS <4 in CDWI image to PI-RADS ≥4 in DL1 images for both readers (P<0.05). Most of the PI-RADS upgraded lesions were from higher than unfavorable intermediate-risk groups according to the 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines with statistically significant difference of marginal probability in DL1 and DL2 for both readers (P<0.05). DLR in DWI for PCa can provide options for improving image quality with a significant impact on PI-RADS evaluation or about a 23% reduction in acquisition time without compromising image quality.