National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Research Articles

Upstaging Prediction Model to Guide the Application of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Indication for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients with high-upstaging risk remains inconsistent. Our previous systematic review and meta-analysis had reported five variables that were significantly higher in the upstaging group. We developed the "high-risk upstaging model" and investigated its predictivity and accuracy. The study included patients initially diagnosed with DCIS in a medical center between 2011 and 2020. Patients' clinicopathological data were obtained through web-based surgical medical record database. Two prediction models were built, in which patients who met at least one (Model A) or two (Model B) of the predictors would be predicted to upstage in the final pathology. We compared the accuracy of our models with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline and original data. The analyses included 249 patients, of which 67 DCIS patients upstaged in final pathology. The excess treatment in Model A (70%) was lower than the original data (80.2%). The incomplete treatment in Model A (3%) was lower than the NCCN guideline model (38.8%) and the original data (7.5%). Both Model A and Model B yielded a higher receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve compared with original data. Our Model A derived from the systematic review of the real-world data reduced the incomplete treatment rate of SLNB. Our Model B also showed the highest predictive value. With the two models, we provided a clearer indication for surgeons to perform SLNB in DCIS patients and demonstrated proof of concept, allowing ready input of patient data.

Actionable Structural Variant Detection via RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS in Patients With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer suggest that RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) may improve the detection of fusions and splicing variants compared with DNA-NGS alone. However, there is limited adoption of RNA-NGS in routine oncology clinical care today. To analyze clinical evidence from a diverse cohort of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and compare the detection of NCCN-recommended actionable structural variants (aSVs; fusions and splicing variants) via concurrent DNA and RNA-NGS vs DNA-NGS alone. This multisite, retrospective cohort study examined patients sequenced between February 2021 and October 2023 within the deidentified, Tempus multimodal database, consisting of linked molecular and clinical data. Participants included patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and sufficient tissue sample quantities for both RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS testing. Received results from RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS solid-tissue profiling assays. Detection rates of NCCN guideline-based structural variants (ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1/2/3 fusions, as well as MET exon 14 skipping splicing alterations) found uniquely by RNA-NGS. In the evaluable cohort of 5570 patients, median (IQR) age was 67.8 (61.3-75.4) years, and 2989 patients (53.7%) were female. The prevalence of actionable structural variants detected by either RNA-NGS or DNA-NGS was 8.8% (n = 491), with 86.7% (n = 426) of these detected by DNA-NGS. Concurrent RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS identified 15.3% more patients harboring aSVs compared with DNA-NGS alone (491 vs 426 patients, respectively), including 14.3% more patients harboring actionable fusions (376 vs 329 patients) and 18.6% more patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations (115 vs 97 patients). There was no significant association between the assay used for aSV detection and aSV-targeted therapeutic adoption or clinical outcome. Emerging structural variants (eSVs) were found to have a combined prevalence to be 0.7%, with only 47.5% of eSVs detected by DNA-NGS. In this cohort study, the detection of structural variants via concurrent RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS was higher across multiple NCCN-guideline recommended biomarkers compared with DNA-NGS alone, suggesting that RNA-NGS should be routinely implemented in the care of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Administrative Aspects of Molecular Diagnostics-Oversight, Regulatory Approval Process, Clinical and Operational Workflows, and Payment Models.

This paper discusses the administrative aspects of molecular diagnostics in oncology, including US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight, the regulatory approval process, clinical, and operational workflows, and payment models. Comprehensive molecular testing is important to deliver optimal oncology care and improve patient outcomes. Despite the potential benefits of testing, utilization remains low. The FDA regulatory approval process is reviewed for in vitro diagnostic products, which includes classification into three regulatory classes on the basis of risk. Companion diagnostic devices are used to guide treatment decisions. The clinical and operational challenges associated with molecular testing in oncology are also discussed, including the rapidly evolving landscape of precision oncology, the wide range of biomarker testing options, and complexities of test ordering, interpretation, and result delivery. There is a need for a multifaceted support approach involving education, technology enhancements, and workflow support to overcome these challenges. In terms of payment models, coverage policies between Medicare and commercial payers are compared with differences in coverage criteria, with Medicare focusing on FDA approval or clearance, whereas commercial payers consider additional factors such as National Comprehensive Cancer Network and ASCO guidelines. Commercial payers tend to cover smaller panels on the basis of guideline-recommended biomarkers, whereas coverage for broad tumor profiling is limited. Several strategies can increase the utilization of molecular testing, including integrating test results into electronic medical record platforms, standardizing billing practices, increasing clinical trials, and primary literature supporting the use of molecular testing, educating physicians, and using tumor boards for result interpretation and treatment discussions.

Diagnostics and Screening in Breast Cancer with Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastasis: A Review of the Literature.

Brain and leptomeningeal metastases are complications of breast cancer with high rates of morbidity and mortality and have an estimated incidence of up to 30%. While National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend screening for central nervous system metastasis in other neurotropic cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, there are no such recommendations for asymptomatic breast cancer patients at any stage of disease. This review highlights ongoing studies into screening and diagnostics for breast cancer with brain and leptomeningeal metastasis (BCBLM) as they relate to patient outcomes and prognostication. These include imaging methods such as MRI with novel contrast agents with or without PET/CT, as well as 'liquid biopsy' testing of the cerebrospinal fluid and serum to analyze circulating tumor cells, genomic material, proteins, and metabolites. Given recent advances in radiation, neurosurgery, and systemic treatments for BCBLM, screening for CNS involvement should be considered in patients with advanced breast cancer as it may impact treatment decisions and overall survival.

Clinical Assessment and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Polyposis Syndromes in an Italian Cohort of Patients with Colorectal Polyps.

Background: Hereditary polyposis syndromes are clinically and genetically heterogeneous conditions associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. They are classified based on polyp histology, inheritance mode, causal gene, and colonic and extracolonic manifestations. Their diagnosis is challenging due to overlapping and heterogeneous clinical presentations. Methods: A multigene next-generation sequencing panel was used to screen 75 index cases with colorectal polyps and a personal/family history of cancer for key hereditary polyposis-associated genes (APC, BMPR1A, MUTYH, PTEN, SMAD4, and STK11) in order to identify germline genetic variants. Results: In the screened index cases, we found 14 pathogenic variants involving APC, MUTYH, SMAD4, and STK11 and 6 variants of uncertain significance involving APC, BMPR1A, and SMAD4. In this cohort, four patients not fulfilling the recommended eligibility criteria of current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for genetic testing were molecularly diagnosed with a hereditary polyposis syndrome. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that stringent NCCN eligibility criteria for molecular screening may lead to missing some of the patients affected by hereditary polyposis syndromes. This highlights the need for a careful evaluation of patients' clinical manifestations, polyp number, age of polyp onset, and family history to select appropriate candidates for molecular diagnosis of these conditions.

Prognostic significance of adjuvant therapy and specific radiation dosages in Taiwanese patients with oral cavity cancer and extra-nodal extension: a nationwide cohort study

BackgroundThe evidence for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with extra-nodal extension (ENE) in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines is derived from patients with head and neck cancer. The guidelines further suggest a radiation dose ranging from 6000 to 6600 cGy. In this nationwide study, we sought to evaluate the prognostic significance of adjuvant therapy and the specific radiation dosage in Taiwanese patients with pure OCSCC and ENE.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 1577 OCSCC patients with ENE who underwent resection and received adjuvant CRT or radiotherapy (RT) between January 2011 and December 2020 was conducted.ResultsMultivariable analysis revealed that adjuvant RT, more than four pathologically positive nodes, and radiation dosage below 6000 cGy were independent risk factors for unfavorable 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Comparing patients who received CRT (n = 1453) to those treated with RT (n = 124) before and after propensity score (PS) matching, the 5-year outcomes were as follows: before PS matching, DSS (54% versus 30%, p < 0.0001), OS (42% versus 18%, p < 0.0001); after PS matching (n = 111 in each group), DSS (52% versus 30%, p = 0.0016), OS (38% versus 21%, p = 0.0019). For patients who underwent CRT, the 5-year outcomes for different radiation dose groups (6600 − 7000 cGy, n = 1155 versus 6000 − 6500 cGy, n = 199) were as follows: before PS matching, DSS (52% versus 54%, p = 0.1904), OS (43% versus 46%, p = 0.1610); after PS matching (n = 199 in each group), DSS (55% versus 54%, p = 0.8374), OS (46.5% versus 46.3%, p = 0.7578).ConclusionsFor OCSCC patients with ENE, our study shows CRT improved survivals than RT alone, underscoring the clinical significance of chemotherapy. Patients undergoing CRT with irradiation doses ranging from 6000 to 6500 cGy exhibited comparable survival outcomes to those receiving doses of 6600–7000 cGy. This observation suggests that irradiation doses exceeding the 6600 cGy may not confer the survival advantage in these patients. Further research is needed to confirm our results and explore the optimal irradiation dose for managing these patients.

Stage-dependent treatment of seminomas

Germ cell neoplasms of the testis are rare solid tumors predominantly in young men. Seminomas are slightly more frequent than nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. A special feature of seminomas is that they are sensitive to radiation, so that this represents an option in tumor stages with few metastases; however, the guideline recommendation is cautious due to the increased risk of secondary malignancies. In nonmetastasized tumor stages active surveillance is the primary approach to avoid overtreatment of patients. This is also the reason for primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in cases of a low metastasis load. This concept has already been implemented in the American Urological Association (AUA) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, whereas in the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines it is still considered to be an individual approach.

Ethnic Access to and Usage of Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair Testing on Colon Cancers at a Regional Veteran Affairs Medical Center

Abstract Introduction/Objective It has been a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendation since 2015 that all colon carcinoma cases should receive mismatch repair and microsatellite instability (MSI/MMR) testing. However, literature on MSI/MMR testing compliance with this recommendation particularly for ethnic minorities and veterans, are sparse in the literature. Methods/Case Report A retrospective review of all invasive colon carcinoma cases from colon or rectum specimens was performed from 2017 to March 8th, 2024, at a regional Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) as part quality assurance (QA) to collect test performance and demographic information. There had been clinical team/pathologist regular education about the NCCN guidelines. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) There were 210 cases from which 183 out of 219 cases (84%) included MSI/MMR testing. From the total population of 210, 92 (43.8%) were African American, 107 were Caucasian American (51.0%) and others were 11 (5.2%). Among the 183 with MSI/MMR testing, 79 (43.2%) were African American, 94 were Caucasian American (51.4%), with the remainder being 10 (5.5%). Testing rate for MSI/MMR over the years increased from 2021 onwards: 40 out of 43 cases in 2017 (93%), 22 out of 27 in 2018 (81%), 27 out of 33 in 2019 (81%), 24 out of 27 in 2020 (88%), 25 out of 34 in 2021 (74%), 21 out of 21 out of in 2022 (100%), and 24 out of 25 in 2023 to 2024 (96% with 1 patient expiring before testing could be sent). Conclusion From 2022 onwards, all patients received MSI/MMR testing if not expired, which is a substantial improvement demonstrating the impact of education and awareness of the current NCCN guidelines along with its impact on patient management. Furthermore, the VAMC provided equal access to MSI/MMR testing to all ethnic groups, thus serving as a paradigm for health equity for colon cancer testing.

Molecular Tumor Testing on Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Specimens in a Large Community-Based Healthcare System.

This study aimed to describe the adherence of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines to perform genetic screening for all colorectal cancer (CRC) specimens with molecular tumor testing, eg, immunohistochemical (IHC) testing, in a large community-based healthcare setting. The study also identified trends involving characteristics of CRC, individual reporting physician, and physician location and examined the potential impact of these trends on the performance of molecular tumor testing. This was a retrospective, multi-center study using a centralized pathology database to assess molecular testing on CRC specimens. The primary endpoint was whether tumor testing of a CRC specimen was performed. Secondary endpoints included tumor location within the colon (ie, the right or left side), year of CRC diagnosis, and location of the pathologist within the Advocate Aurora Health (AAH) system. The data were collected from 2016 to 2020. A total of 2469 CRC cases, reviewed by 47 pathologists practicing in five separate hospitals, were identified within the AAH system for the selected five-year time period. IHC testing was performed in 1666 of these specimens (67.5%). There was no statistical difference between CRC sidedness and IHC testing performed (p = 0.9). There were no discernible features or trends for the ordering of IHC testing among different pathologists. Molecular tumor testing for CRC specimens in this large community-based healthcare setting was inconsistent and below the ideal adherence rate of 100%. Secondary findings offered neither explanation nor trends in likelihood to send samples for IHC testing. Education would be beneficial for pathologists and all physicians who care for patients with CRC in community-based health care settings.

Personalized oncology, ethics and adherence to NCCN guidelines.

Successful personalized oncology today depends on clinicians taking advantage of the extensive, evidence-based information provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines, which arguably represent the most important advance in cancer care occurring in the last many decades. Personalized oncology also demands that clinicians present guideline information to each patient in a thorough, comprehendible and unbiased manner. Finally, the patient's ability to process that information for shared decision-making about whether an intervention is consistent with their personal preferences, goals and values is perhaps the most important ingredient in truly personalized oncology care. Here, the ethics of sometimes transgressing from the NCCN guidelines with the aim of more personalized care is discussed.

A deep learning model to enhance the classification of primary bone tumors based on incomplete multimodal images in X-ray, CT, and MRI

BackgroundAccurately classifying primary bone tumors is crucial for guiding therapeutic decisions. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend multimodal images to provide different perspectives for the comprehensive evaluation of primary bone tumors. However, in clinical practice, most patients’ medical multimodal images are often incomplete. This study aimed to build a deep learning model using patients’ incomplete multimodal images from X-ray, CT, and MRI alongside clinical characteristics to classify primary bone tumors as benign, intermediate, or malignant.MethodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 1305 patients with histopathologically confirmed primary bone tumors (internal dataset, n = 1043; external dataset, n = 262) were included from two centers between January 2010 and December 2022. We proposed a Primary Bone Tumor Classification Transformer Network (PBTC-TransNet) fusion model to classify primary bone tumors. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate the model’s classification performance.ResultsThe PBTC-TransNet fusion model achieved satisfactory micro-average AUCs of 0.847 (95% CI: 0.832, 0.862) and 0.782 (95% CI: 0.749, 0.817) on the internal and external test sets. For the classification of benign, intermediate, and malignant primary bone tumors, the model respectively achieved AUCs of 0.827/0.727, 0.740/0.662, and 0.815/0.745 on the internal/external test sets. Furthermore, across all patient subgroups stratified by the distribution of imaging modalities, the PBTC-TransNet fusion model gained micro-average AUCs ranging from 0.700 to 0.909 and 0.640 to 0.847 on the internal and external test sets, respectively. The model showed the highest micro-average AUC of 0.909, accuracy of 84.3%, micro-average sensitivity of 84.3%, and micro-average specificity of 92.1% in those with only X-rays on the internal test set. On the external test set, the PBTC-TransNet fusion model gained the highest micro-average AUC of 0.847 for patients with X-ray + CT.ConclusionsWe successfully developed and externally validated the transformer-based PBTC-Transnet fusion model for the effective classification of primary bone tumors. This model, rooted in incomplete multimodal images and clinical characteristics, effectively mirrors real-life clinical scenarios, thus enhancing its strong clinical practicability.

Detection of Germline Variants in Patients With Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Through Guideline-Based Testing.

There is increasing awareness that patients with prostate cancer frequently harbor germline variants that may carry important implications for them and their family members. Given the variable clinical guidelines, there remains a need to better understand which patients with prostate cancer are likely to harbor pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants. We sought to understand factors associated with P/LP germline variants in patients with metastatic or localized prostate cancer qualifying for National Comprehensive Cancer Network genetic testing criteria. Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were offered genetic testing in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Patient-level factors, including demographic, clinical, and pathologic data, were tracked in a prospectively collected registry. The association of the presence of a P/LP variant in germline testing results with patient-level factors was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Variables were tested for overall significance with chi-squared tests. Five hundred five patients underwent germline testing and had clinical data available. Rates of P/LP germline variants were 7.6% (20/264) in patients with metastatic disease and 11.2% (27/241) in patients with localized disease. The most prevalent P/LP variants were CHEK2 (34%), BRCA2 (22%), ATM (10%), and HOXB13 (10%). In this cohort of patients undergoing guideline-informed germline testing, P/LP germline variants were found in similar proportions across all age ranges and clinical characteristics. Only age at genetic testing for patients with metastatic disease was demonstrated to be predictive of the presence of a P/LP germline variant, highlighting the challenges associated with refining current clinical testing guidelines.

7044 It Is Back, Three Decades Later! When To Stop Glucagonoma surveillance?

Abstract Disclosure: A.T. Wahba: None. J.S. Dillon: Advisory Board Member; Self; Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, CA. A 76-year-old woman presented to the Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET) Clinic for evaluation of sore mouth, perianal area and itchy ankles. She had a medical history notable for glucagonoma, status post distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy in 1988, 32 years prior to her current presentation. She recalled that she had CT imaging post operatively for a few years, but no more recent imaging. She was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus in approximately 2002, with highly variable glucose control. She developed a left leg DVT with pulmonary emboli one year prior to presentation. Shortly after her thromboembolic events, she noted her current presenting complaints. A CT abdomen scan with contrast was reported as normal. Three months later, an abdomen ultrasound for evaluation of right upper quadrant pain and intractable vomiting, showed a liver mass. MRI revealed a contrast enhancing 3.1x2.1x1.8 cm lesion in liver segment 6 and 7. Her plasma Glucagon concentration, which had been undetectable when last checked in 2007, was 382 (N: &amp;lt; 80 pg/ml). CT-guided needle biopsy of the liver lesion confirmed a well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, immunohistochemically positive for somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2A), Islet-1 and PAX6, with low mitotic count and Ki-67 proliferation index of 0.45%. Gallium-68 DOTATATE-PET scan showed a single avid hepatic metastasis, with no other evidence of somatostatin receptor expressing tumor. She was initially started on a combination of short-acting Octreotide 100 mcg TID and monthly 20 mg Sandostatin LAR injections for symptomatic relief. Zinc copper 100 mg capsules were prescribed with significant improvement of skin rash and glossitis within 2-4 months. Repeat MRI abdomen at 3 months and 6 months showed a stable single liver lesion without evidence of additional metastasis. She has continued annual clinic visits and abdomen MRI follow up with stable imaging findings at 3 years. Percutaneous ablation, trans hepatic arterial embolization and surgical resection were discussed, but the patient preferred a more conservative approach of monthly octreotide LAR, which she tolerated well, and which resolved her symptoms. Glucagonoma syndrome presents classically with 5D’s: Dermatitis (Necrolytic Migratory Erythema), DVTs, Diabetes mellitus, Depression, Diarrhea. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend monitoring glucagonoma patients post-resection for up to 10 years with clinical evaluation, glucagon levels every 6-12 months and imaging studies as clinically indicated. Our case illustrates that recurrence can occur after 30 years from initial resection and that longer surveillance should be considered. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Evaluation and Surgical Management of Pediatric Cutaneous Melanoma and Atypical Spitz and Non-Spitz Melanocytic Tumors (Melanocytomas): A Report From Children's Oncology Group.

The purpose of this study was to develop recommendations for the diagnostic evaluation and surgical management of cutaneous melanoma (CM) and atypical Spitz tumors (AST) and non-Spitz melanocytic tumors (melanocytomas) in pediatric (age 0-10 years) and adolescent (age 11-18 years) patients. A Children's Oncology Group-led panel with external, multidisciplinary CM specialists convened to develop recommendations on the basis of available data and expertise. Thirty-three experts from multiple specialties (cutaneous/medical/surgical oncology, dermatology, and dermatopathology) established recommendations with supporting data from 87 peer-reviewed publications. (1) Excisional biopsies with 1-3 mm margins should be performed when feasible for clinically suspicious melanocytic neoplasms. (2) Definitive surgical treatment for CM, including wide local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), should follow National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines in the absence of data from pediatric-specific surgery trials and/or cohort studies. (3) Accurate classification of ASTs as benign or malignant is more likely with immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing. (4) It may not be possible to classify some ASTs as likely/definitively benign or malignant after clinicopathologic and/or molecular correlation, and these Spitz tumors of uncertain malignant potential should be excised with 5 mm margins. (5) ASTs favored to be benign should be excised with 1- to 3-mm margins if transected on biopsy. (6) Re-excision is not necessary if the AST does not extend to the biopsy margin(s) when complete/excisional biopsy was performed. (7) SLNB should not be performed for Spitz tumors unless a diagnosis of CM is favored on clinicopathologic evaluation. (8) Non-Spitz melanocytomas have a presumed increased risk for progression to CM and should be excised with 1- to 3-mm margins if transected on biopsy. (9) Re-excision of non-Spitz melanocytomas is not necessary if the lesion is completely excised on biopsy.

Standardized treatment of oral cancer under the guidance of clinical practice guidelines of National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Oral cancer represents a serious public health problem affecting oral and system health with a high global incidence. Treatment strategies for oral cancer vary in different disciplines and are likely to be limited to certain doctor's personal experience. While clinical practice guidelines are considered to enable doctors to determine the most appropriate and consistent treatment strategy according to the patient's situation. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines have become the most prevalent in global clinical oncology practice. This article mainly focuses on cases to discuss the normalized treatment strategy for oral cancer in different stages based on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Head and Neck Cancers, Version 3, 2024.

Association of area-level broadband and non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis and guideline-concordant care in the US.

96 Background: Access to broadband is a social determinant of health facilitating connections with healthcare services and other resources and alleviating burdens of travel distance, time, and cost. We used nationwide data to examine the association of zip code-level broadband usage and stage at diagnosis, as well as the receipt of quality care among individuals newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Individuals ≥18 years newly diagnosed with first primary NSCLC between April - December of 2019-2021, were identified from the National Cancer Database (January - March were excluded to match the COVID-19 timeframe in 2020). Broadband usage percentage (the percentage of individuals per zip code with access to fixed broadband at speeds of 25 Mbps/3 Mbps in 2020) were combined with the cohort based on individual’s residential zip code. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between broadband usage quartiles and stage at diagnosis, as well as the receipt of guideline-concordant care based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, including surgery and radiation, ≥10 lymph nodes sampling, chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACR). Analyses were conducted overall and stratified by metropolitan status and year, adjusting for age group, sex, race and ethnicity, comorbidity, distance to facility, state, and zip code-level social deprivation index (SDI). Results: Cohort included 305,198 individuals newly diagnosed with NSCLC. Individuals living in areas with the highest broadband usage were more likely to be aged 65-74 years, female, non-Hispanic White, with Medicare coverage, living in metropolitan and low SDI areas. In adjusted models, individuals living in areas with the highest broadband usage were more likely to be diagnosed with stage I NSCLC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.01-1.20) and to receive guideline-concordant NACR (AOR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.09-1.73) compared with those living in areas with the lowest broadband usage in 2020. When stratified by metropolitan status, associations of broadband and diagnosis and receipt of NACR were only observed among individuals living in non-metropolitan areas with medium-low and medium-high broadband usage, respectively (AOR = 1.15, 95%CI = 1.01-1.32; AOR = 1.80, 95%CI = 1.25-2.58). No significant associations were identified for other care modalities or during 2019 and 2021. Conclusions: Increased access to broadband usage is associated with earlier stage NSCLC diagnosis and receiving guideline-concordant NACR in 2020. Our results suggest that increased broadband access, combined with the expansion of telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, may have improved telehealth utilization throughout 2020, leading to enhanced quality of cancer care, particularly benefiting individuals residing in non-metropolitan areas.

Uptake of germline genetic testing in patients with advanced breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer.

19 Background: With FDA approval of PARP inhibitors for treatment of BRCA1/2 -associated advanced breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for germline genetic testing (GGT) have expanded for patients with these tumor types since 2019. We aimed to analyze factors associated with GGT uptake in these patient populations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients diagnosed with metastatic breast and prostate cancer and all stages of ovarian and pancreatic cancer in 2020-2023 at Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York City. We extracted data from the electronic medical record on demographics (age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, Jewish ancestry, marital status) and clinical characteristics (tumor type, year of diagnosis, family history of cancer, receipt of somatic testing, genetic counseling, targeted therapy). The primary outcome was receipt of GGT. Descriptive statistics were generated and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the association between demographic/clinical factors and GGT uptake. Results: Among 884 evaluable patients, mean age was 67 years (SD, 14) and the study population included 45% Whites, 15% Blacks, 21% Hispanics, and 9% Asians/Others; 14% had Jewish ancestry. Only 16% were seen by a genetic counselor, 66% had undergone GGT, and 57% had somatic testing. After adjustment for confounders, younger age, Jewish ancestry, later year at diagnosis, and family history of breast or pancreatic cancer were significantly associated with GGT uptake. Patients with pancreatic or prostate cancer were about 60% less likely to undergo GGT compared to patients with ovarian cancer. Patients who had somatic testing were over 4.5-fold more likely to receive GGT. No significant differences were observed based upon sex or race/ethnicity. Among patients who underwent GGT, 20% were found to have a PV and over half of patients who received targeted therapy had PVs detected. Conclusions: We observed increasing use of oncologist-led GGT over time with over 65% of patients with advanced breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer undergoing testing, of which 20% had PVs detected. Given the evolution of targeted therapies and the potential downstream impact of known PVs for family members, under-utilization of GGT in patients with pancreatic and prostate cancer as well as older individuals should be addressed in future studies.

Racial Disparities in Cancer Guideline-Concordant Treatment Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Data for Patients With NSCLC

IntroductionDespite efforts to achieve health care equality, racial/ethnic disparities persist in lung cancer survival in the United States, with non-Hispanic Black patients experiencing higher mortality compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Previous research often focused on single treatments, overlooking the broad range of options available. We aimed to highlight disparities in survival and receipt of comprehensive lung cancer treatment by developing a guideline-concordant initial treatment (GCIT) indicator based on disease stage and recommended treatment. MethodsUsing data of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results on 377,370 patients with NSCLC, we derived a GCIT indicator based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Observed probabilities and logistic regression models adjusted for age, disease stage, and race were used to assess racial disparities in treatment and survival, with the Kaplan-Meier method evaluating survival rates. Racial/ethnic groups analyzed included non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaska Native. ResultsNon-Hispanic Black patients had lower odds of receiving GCIT (OR = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–0.82) and surviving 2 years after diagnosis (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.78–0.82). Non-Hispanic Asians had the highest odds of receiving GCIT (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.99–1.05). Patients receiving GCIT had improved survival, with early stage patients experiencing median survival of 67 to 102 months, compared with 11 to 17 months for those without GCIT. ConclusionReceiving GCIT significantly improves survival across all races, though disparities in receipt are observed. Interventions are needed to ensure equitable access to guideline-concordant care and reduce survival disparities for patients.

Racial Disparities in Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care in Older Adults With Early Breast Cancer

Racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care (GCC) among older patients with potentially curable breast cancer are understudied. To determine whether rates of GCC, time to treatment initiation, and all-cause mortality in stage I to III breast cancer differ by race among older adults. This cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database and included patients aged 65 years and older with stage I to III breast cancer, diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. Data analysis was conducted between July 2022 to July 2023. Race, defined as non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White. The primary outcome was nonreceipt of GCC, defined using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was time to treatment initiation. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were used to determine association between exposure and outcomes. Models for GCC and all-cause mortality included age, stage, receptor status, year of diagnosis, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, insurance, health care setting, and neighborhood-level educational attainment and median income. The analytic cohort included 258 531 participants (mean [SD] age, 72.5 [6.0] years), with 25 174 participants who identified as non-Hispanic Black (9.7%) and 233 357 participants who identified as non-Hispanic White (90.3%), diagnosed between 2010 and 2017. A total of 4563 non-Hispanic Black participants (18.1%) and 35 374 non-Hispanic White participants (15.2%) did not receive GCC. Non-Hispanic Black race, compared with non-Hispanic White race, was associated with increased odds of not receiving GCC in the multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.17; P < .001). Non-Hispanic Black race was associated with 26.1% increased risk of all-cause mortality in the univariate analysis, which decreased to 4.7%, after adjusting for GCC and clinical and sociodemographic factors (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .006). Non-Hispanic White race, compared with non-Hispanic Black race, was associated with increased odds of initiating treatment within 30 (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.6-1.69), 60 (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 2.04-2.18), and 90 (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.27-2.51) days of diagnosis. In this cohort study, non-Hispanic Black race was associated with increased odds of not receiving GCC and less timely treatment initiation. Non-Hispanic Black race was associated with increased all-cause mortality, which was reduced after adjusting for GCC and clinical and sociodemographic factors. These findings suggest that optimizing timely receipt of GCC may represent a modifiable pathway to improving inferior survival outcomes among older non-Hispanic Black patients with breast cancer.

Defining the Need for Services for Patients at High Risk of Breast Cancer at a Safety-Net Hospital: An Approach to Narrowing the Disparities Gap.

The National Accreditation Program for Breast Cancer (NAPBC) standards were recently revised to promote breast cancer (BC) risk assessment and subsequent referral for high-risk services. This project sought to estimate the proportion of patients at high risk for BC in the authors' safety-net hospital system, gauge patient interest in high-risk services, and define resources for program development. Women presenting for breast imaging during 2 weeks in 2023 were surveyed. Thirty-five patients with a history or diagnosis of BC were excluded. The Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) model version 8 was used to calculate BC risk. High/intermediate risk was defined as a 10-year risk of 5% or more, a lifetime risk of 15% or more, or both. The criteria for genetic counseling and testing referral were based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. A total of 257 patients had a TC risk assessment showing 14.8% (n = 38) with a 10-year BC risk of 5% or more (consideration of endocrine therapy), 6.2% (n = 16) with a lifetime BC risk of 20% or more (qualifying for annual screening MRI), and 10.5% (n = 27) with a lifetime BC risk of 15% or more (consideration of high-risk screening). The criteria for genetic counseling/testing were met by 61 (23.7%) of the 257 patients. Overall, 31.5% (n = 81) qualified for high/intermediate-risk screening, risk reduction, and/or genetic assessment/testing, 92.8% of whom were interested in referrals for additional information and care. In the authors' community, almost one third of patients undergoing breast imaging qualify for BC high-risk assessment and services. The majority of the patients expressed interest in pursuing such services. These data will be used in financial planning and resource allocation to develop a high-risk program at the authors' institution in line with NAPBC guidelines. They are hopeful that these efforts will improve oncologic outcomes and survival from BC in their community.