National Cancer Screening Program Research Articles

Risk Factors and Mortality Among Women With Interval Breast Cancer vs Screen-Detected Breast Cancer

The risk factors for interval breast cancer (IBC) compared with those for screen-detected breast cancer (SBC) and their association with mortality outcomes have not yet been evaluated among Korean women. To evaluate risk factors associated with IBC and survival among Korean women with IBC compared with those with SBC. This retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database. Women who participated in a national mammographic breast cancer screening program between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, were included. Mortality outcomes were calculated from the date of breast cancer diagnosis to the date of death or December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed from March 1 to June 30, 2023. Breast cancer diagnosed within 6 to 24 months after a negative screening result (ie, IBC) or within 6 months after a positive screening result (ie, SBC). Risk factors and survival rates for IBC and SBC. This study included 8702 women with IBC (mean [SD] age, 53.3 [8.6] years) and 9492 women with SBC (mean [SD] age, 54.1 [9.0] years). Compared with SBC, the probability of IBC decreased as mammographic density increased. Lower body mass index, menopausal status, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use, and lack of family history of breast cancer were associated with a higher likelihood of IBC. When stratified by detection time, younger age at breast cancer diagnosis and family history of breast cancer were associated with an increased likelihood of IBC diagnosed at 6 to 12 months but a decreased likelihood of IBC diagnosed at 12 to 24 months. Overall mortality of IBC was comparable with SBC, but total mortality and cancer-related mortality of IBC diagnosed between 6 and 12 months was higher than that of SBC. The findings of this cohort study suggest that breast density, obesity, and HRT use were associated with IBC compared with SBC. These findings also suggest that higher supplemental breast ultrasound use among Korean women, especially those with dense breasts, could be attributed to a lower incidence of IBC among women with dense breasts compared with women with SBC, due to greater detection. Finally, overall mortality of IBC was comparable with that of SBC.

A structured process for the validation of a decision-analytic model: application to a cost-effectiveness model for risk-stratified national breast screening.

Decision-makers require knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of decision-analytic models used to evaluate healthcare interventions to be able to confidently use the results of such models to inform policy. A number of aspects of model validity have previously been described, but no systematic approach to assessing the validity of a model has been proposed. This study aimed to consolidate the different aspects of model validity into a step-by-step approach to assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a decision-analytic model. A pre-defined set of steps were used to conduct the validation process of an exemplar early decision-analytic-model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of a risk-stratified national breast cancer screening programme [UK healthcare perspective; lifetime horizon; costs (£; 2021)]. Internal validation was assessed in terms of descriptive validity, technical validity and face validity. External validation was assessed in terms of operational validation, convergent validity (or corroboration) and predictive validity. The results outline the findings of each step of internal and external validation of the early decision-analytic-model and present the validated model (called 'MANC-RISK-SCREEN'). The positive aspects in terms of meeting internal validation requirements are shown together with the remaining limitations of MANC-RISK-SCREEN. Following a transparent and structured validation process, MANC-RISK-SCREEN has been shown to have satisfactory internal and external validity for use in informing resource allocation decision-making. We suggest that MANC-RISK-SCREEN can be used to assess the cost-effectiveness of exemplars of risk-stratified national breast cancer screening programmes (NBSP) from the UK perspective. A step-by-step process for conducting the validation of a decision-analytic model was developed for future use by health economists. Using this approach may help researchers to fully demonstrate the strengths and limitations of their model to decision-makers.

Screening for hepatitis C virus at the time of mammography using rapid diagnostic tests in women aged between 50 and 74 years (Mamm'OC NCT05067374).

Chronic hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection presents a global health challenge, with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite remarkable progress in treatment options, achieving elimination targets by 2030, as set by the World Health Organization, remains elusive. Our study aimed to address this gap by integrating HCV screening into a national breast cancer screening program. Between March 2022 and March 2023, a prospective cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in four radiology centers in Montpellier, France. We proposed HCV screening to consecutive women undergoing mammography, targeting 1,500 participants aged 50-74 years. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for HCV antibodies (HCV Ab) was performed on capillary whole blood, with positive cases undergoing serological and RNA confirmation. Participants also completed a questionnaire on demographic data and risk factors. Acceptance rates, HCV prevalence, and linkage to care were assessed. The acceptance rate for this integrated screening approach was 82.4%. Notably, the seroprevalence of HCV was found to be 0.65%. Linkage to care was prompt, and the cascade of care demonstrated successful treatment outcomes. Importantly, the majority of detected infections were successfully resolved. These findings underscore the feasibility and acceptability of integrating HCV screening with breast cancer screening programs providing updated prevalence data and valuable insights for refining future screening strategies.

Cancer detection rate of breast-MR in supplemental screening after negative mammography in women with dense breasts. Preliminary results of the MA-DETECT-Study after 200 participants

BACKGROUNDDue to increased cancer detection rates (CDR), breast MR (breast MRI) can reduce underdiagnosis of breast cancer compared to conventional imaging techniques, particularly in women with dense breasts. The purpose of this study is to report the additional breast cancer yield by breast MRI in women with dense breasts after receiving a negative screening mammogram. METHODSFor this study we invited consecutive participants of the national German breast cancer Screening program with breast density categories ACR C & D and a negative mammogram to undergo additional screening by breast MRI. Endpoints were CDR and recall rates. This study reports interim results in the first 200 patients. At a power of 80% and considering an alpha error of 5%, this preliminary population size is sufficient to demonstrate a 4/1000 improvement in CDR. RESULTSIn 200 screening participants, 8 women (40/1000, 17.4–77.3/1000) were recalled due to positive breast MRI findings. Image-guided biopsy revealed 5 cancers in 4 patients (one bilateral), comprising four invasive cancers and one case of DCIS. 3 patients revealed 4 invasive cancers presenting with ACR C breast density and one patient non-calcifying DCIS in a woman with ACR D breast density, resulting in a CDR of 20/1000 (95%-CI 5.5–50.4/1000) and a PPV of 50% (95%-CI 15.7–84.3%). CONCLUSIONOur initial results demonstrate that supplemental screening using breast MRI in women with heterogeneously dense and very dense breasts yields an additional cancer detection rate in line with a prior randomized trial on breast MRI screening of women with extremely dense breasts. These findings are highly important as the population investigated constitutes a much higher proportion of women and yielded cancers particularly in women with heterogeneously dense breasts.

Understanding of cervical cancer, acceptability of HPV self-collection, and prevalence of HPV in a semi-urban setting in Bangladesh.

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling has been implemented successfully as an alternative to traditional forms of cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings. Through Bangladesh's current national cervical cancer screening program, only about 10% of the at-risk population is reached. Thus, Bangladesh is an ideal setting to consider HPV self-sampling to improve cervical cancer prevention efforts. However, the feasibility and acceptability of HPV self-sampling has not been evaluated in Bangladesh. We aimed to understand levels of HPV and cervical cancer knowledge and to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in a semi-urban Bangladeshi community. Participants were recruited from a local clinic; 164 women completed a cross-sectional questionnaire about attitudes towards screening, and cervical cancer and HPV risk factor knowledge, and provided self-collected cervical samples for high-risk HPV testing. Of the participants, 4.3% tested positive for high-risk HPV and were referred for appropriate follow-up care. Nearly all participants had heard of cervical cancer, though specific knowledge was quite low. Self-sampling for high-risk HPV testing had high rates of acceptability, high rates of convenience, and very little discomfort and embarrassment reported in this study population, making implementing HPV self-sampling as a form of cervical cancer screening in Bangladesh appear feasible.

Enhancing Lung Cancer Care in Portugal: Bridging Gaps for Improved Patient Outcomes.

Lung cancer has the highest incidence and cancer-related mortality worldwide. In Portugal, it ranks as the fourth most common cancer, with nearly 6000 new cases being diagnosed every year. Lung cancer is the main cause of cancer-related death among males and the third cause of cancer-related death in females. Despite the globally accepted guidelines and recommendations for what would be the ideal path for a lung cancer patient, several challenges occur in real clinical management across the world. The recommendations emphasize the importance of adequate screening of high-risk individuals, a precise tumour biopsy, and an accurate final diagnosis to confirm the neoplastic nature of the nodule. A detailed histological classification of the lung tumour type and a comprehensive molecular characterization are of utmost importance for the selection of an efficacious and patient-directed therapeutic approach. However, in the context of the Portuguese clinical organization and the national healthcare system, there are still several gaps in the ideal pathway for a lung cancer patient, involving aspects ranging from the absence of a national lung cancer screening programme through difficulties in histological diagnosis and molecular characterization to challenges in therapeutic approaches. In this manuscript, we address the most relevant weaknesses, presenting several proposals for potential solutions to improve the management of lung cancer patients, helping to decisively improve their overall survival and quality of life.

Elderly people with a positive test of the national colon cancer screening program in the Dubrovnik-Neretva County

Elderly people with a positive test of the national colon cancer screening program in the Dubrovnik-Neretva County

Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.

The rate of interval colorectal cancer (iCRC) is now accepted as a key performance indicator of organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. We aimed to examine the association between endoscopist volumes and the rate of iCRC among individuals with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within a nationwide population-based CRC screening program. Individuals aged ≥50 years who underwent colonoscopy after a positive FIT from January 1, 2019 until December 31, 2020 in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) were enrolled. We converted the data into per-endoscopist screening results, calculated the iCRC rates per endoscopist, and compared them to the previous year's annual volume that was divided into five groups (V1, 1-9; V2, 10-29; V3, 30-59; V4, 60-119; V5, ≥120). A total of 10,412 endoscopists performed 216,907 colonoscopies. Overall, the average rate of iCRC per endoscopist was 8.46 per 1,000 examinations. Compared with the group with the highest volume (V5 group), the rate of iCRC was 2.21 times higher in the V1 group. Similar trends were observed in the other groups (V2: Relative risks [RR], 2.15; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.57-2.94; V3: RR, 1.56, 95% CI, 1.15-2.13; V4: RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.83-1.67). The findings emphasize that endoscopists with lower procedure volumes have higher risks of interval cancer being missed or undetected. To maximize the preventative impact of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer, this issue should be addressed by monitoring endoscopist volumes and variations in performances.

The Prognostic Quality of Risk Prediction Models to Assess the Individual Breast Cancer Risk in Women: An Overview of Reviews

Purpose. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally, with an incidence of approximately two million cases in 2018. Organised age-based breast cancer screening programs were established worldwide to detect breast cancer earlier and to reduce mortality. Currently, there is substantial anticipation regarding risk-adjusted screening programs, considering various risk factors in addition to age. The present study investigated the discriminatory accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction models and whether they suit risk-based screening programs. Methods. Following the PICO scheme, we conducted an overview of reviews and systematically searched four databases. All methodological steps, including the literature selection, data extraction and synthesis, and the quality appraisal were conducted following the 4-eyes principle. For the quality assessment, the AMSTAR 2 tool was used. Results. We included eight systematic reviews out of 833 hits based on the prespecified inclusion criteria. The eight systematic reviews comprised ninety-nine primary studies that were also considered for the data analysis. Three systematic reviews were assessed as having a high risk of bias, while the others were rated with a moderate or low risk of bias. Most identified breast cancer risk prediction models showed a low prognostic quality. Adding breast density and genetic information as risk factors only moderately improved the models’ discriminatory accuracy. Conclusion. All breast cancer risk prediction models published to date show a limited ability to predict the individual breast cancer risk in women. Hence, it is too early to implement them in national breast cancer screening programs. Relevant randomised controlled trials about the benefit-harm ratio of risk-adjusted breast cancer screening programs compared to conventional age-based programs need to be awaited.

Coronary Artery Calcification on Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening CT in South Korea: Visual and Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment and Association With Cardiovascular Events.

Background: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) on lung cancer screening low-dose chest CT (LDCT) is a cardiovascular risk marker. South Korea was the first Asian country to initiate a national LDCT lung cancer screening program, although CAC-related outcomes are poorly explored. Objective: To evaluate CAC prevalence and severity using visual analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) methods and to characterize CAC's association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients undergoing LDCT in Korea's national lung cancer screening program. Methods: This retrospective study included 1002 patients (mean age, 62.4±5.4 years; 994 men, 8 women) who underwent LDCT at two Korean medical centers between April 2017 and May 2023 as part of Korea's national lung cancer screening program. Two radiologists independently assessed CAC presence and severity using visual analysis, consulting a third radiologist to resolve differences. Two AI software applications were also used to assess CAC presence and severity. MACE occurrences were identified by EMR review. Results: Interreader agreement for CAC presence and severity, expressed as kappa, were 0.793 and 0.671, respectively. CAC prevalence was 53.4% by consensus visual assessment, 56.6% by AI software I, and 60.1% by AI software II. CAC severity was mild, moderate, and severe by consensus visual analysis in 28.0%, 10.3% and 15.1%; by AI software I in 39.9%, 14.0%, and 6.2%; and by AI software II in 34.9%, 14.3%, and 7.3%. MACE occurred in 36 of 625 (5.6%) patients with follow-up after LDCT (median, 1108 days). MACE incidence in patients with no, mild, moderate, and severe CAC, for consensus visual analysis was 1.1%, 5.0%, 2.9%, and 8.6% (p<.001); for AI software I was 1.3%, 3.0%, 7.9%, and 11.3% (p<.001); and for AI software II was 1.2%, 5.0%, 7.7%, and 9.6% (p<.001) Conclusion: For Korea's national lung cancer screening program, MACE occurrence increased significantly with increasing CAC severity, whether assessed by visual analysis or AI software. The study is limited by the large sex imbalance for Korea's national lung cancer screening program. Clinical Impact: The findings provide reference data for healthcare practitioners engaged in developing and overseeing national lung cancer screening programs, highlighting the importance of routine CAC evaluation.

The prognostic value of tumor budding in a thoroughly characterized stage II colon cancer population in the context of a national screening program

Tumor budding as a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer has not previously been investigated in a cohort of screened stage II colon cancer patients. We assessed the prognostic significance of tumor budding in a thoroughly characterized stage II colon cancer population comprising surgically resected patients in the Region of Southern Denmark from 2014 to 2016. Tumors were re-staged according to the 8th edition of UICC TNM Classification, undergoing detailed histopathological evaluation and tumor budding assessment following guidelines from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference. Prognostic evaluation utilized Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models for time to recurrence (TTR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).Out of 497 patients, 20% were diagnosed through the national colorectal cancer screening program. High-grade tumor budding (Bd3) was found in 19% of tumors and was associated with glandular subtype, perineural invasion, mismatch repair proficient tumors, and tumor recurrence (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.045, and p = 0.007 respectively). In multivariable Cox regression, high-grade budding was a significant prognostic factor for TTR compared to low-grade (Bd3 HR 2.617; p = 0.007). An association between tumor budding groups and RFS was observed, and the difference was significant in univariable analysis for high-grade compared to low-grade tumor budding (Bd3 HR 1.461; p = 0.041). No significant differences were observed between tumor budding groups and OS.High-grade tumor budding is a predictor of recurrence in a screened population of patients with stage II colon cancer and should be considered a high-risk factor in a shared decision-making process when stratifying patients to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Early detection of prostate cancer: a screening charity's perspective

CHAPS Men's Health Charity is playing a key role in raising awareness of prostate cancer in the UK. In particular, it seeks to educate both the public and health care professionals on the importance of early diagnosis and campaigns for a national prostate cancer screening programme.

Feasibility and Acceptability of Self-sampling for Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing Among Asymptomatic Women in Rural Delta State, Nigeria

Background: Self-sampling and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing can be vital tools in cervical cancer screening for hard-to-reach women with limited access to health care in sub-Saharan Africa. This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of self-sampling for HPV testing among asymptomatic women in Orhuwhorun community in Delta State. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 230 women aged between 30 - 65years, enrolled by a multi-stage sampling method. Recruited women were asked to provide self-collected vaginal samples between May and June, 2021. HPV detection and genotyping was done using 21 HPV Geno-Array Diagnostic kit. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires after self-sampling to point out their experiences and acceptability of HPV self-sampling. Results: An excellent feasibility of self-sampling (95.2%) was observed. The acceptability rate of self-sampling was 93.0%, and 99.6% (229/230) of the participants were confident that they used the device correctly. The quality of self-sampling was satisfactory in 100% of the samples; 21.1% (48/228) of the samples were positive for HPV, including 12.3% (28/228) with high-risk HPV types,2.6% (6/228) with probable high risk HPV types and 1.8% (4/228)with low-risk HPV types. Multiple HPV infection occurred in 10 cases (4.4%). Conclusion: This study indicates that self-sampling is a feasible and acceptable approach for cervical cancer screening among women in rural Delta State. Thus, the government should consider self-sampling as a valuable strategy in implementing national cancer screening programme.

Participant experiences in the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea: Insights from focus group interviews

Participant experiences in the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea: Insights from focus group interviews

Electronic aggregated data collection on cervical cancer screening in Bangladesh since 2014: what the data tells us?

IntroductionTo reduce the high prevalence of cervical cancers among the Bangladeshi women, the Government of Bangladesh established a national cervical cancer screening programme in 2005 for women aged 30 to 60 years. The District Health Information System Version 2 (DHIS2) based electronic aggregated data collection system is used since the year 2013. This study summarises data from the year 2014 to 2022 to assess the effectiveness of the electronic data collection system in understanding the outcome of the screening programme.MethodsThis is a descriptive study based on secondary data extracted in MS Excel from the DHIS2-based electronic repository of the national cervical cancer screening programme of Bangladesh. The respondents were women aged 30–60 years, screened for cervical cancer using VIA (Visual Inspection of cervix with Acetic acid) method in 465 government health facilities. The data were collected on the participants’ residential location, month and year of screening, name and type of health facilities performing VIA, and VIA screening results.ResultsThe national screening programme reported a total 3.36 million VIA tests from 465 government hospitals in 8 years (2014 to 2022). The national average VIA-positivity rate was 3.6%, which varied from 1.4 to 9.5% among the districts. This national screening programme witnessed an exponential growth, year after year, with 83.3% increase in VIA test from 2014 to 2022. The primary and the secondary care hospitals were the highest collective contributors of VIA tests (86.2%) and positive cases (77.8%). The VIA-positivity rates in different hospital types varied widely, 7.0% in the medical university hospital, 5.7% in the medical college hospitals, 3.9% in the district/general hospitals, and 3.0% in the upazila health complexes.ConclusionsA national cervical cancer screening programme using VIA method and a DHIS2-based electronic data collection backbone, is effective, sustainable, and useful to understand the screening coverage, VIA positivity rate and geographic distribution of the participants and case load to initiate policy recommendations and actions. Decentralization of the screening programme and more efforts at the primary and secondary care level is required to increase screening performances.

Prevalence of Multiple High Risk Human Papilloma Virus (HR-HPV) Infections in Cervical Cancer Screening in Lazio Region, Italy.

It has been well established that human papilloma virus (HPV) is the major cause of cervical pre-cancerous lesions and cervical cancer. Extended HPV genotyping has pointed out that co-infections with multiple high-risk (HR)-HPV genotypes not only is possible and quite frequent, but also has different prognoses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of co-infections in women tested for HR-HPV in the national cervical cancer screening program of Lazio (Italy). From June 1st to November 30th 2022, we analyzed 30,445 samples of women aged between 30 and 64 years, using the Anyplex TM II HPV HR Detection test by Seegene (Arrow), which identifies 14 HPV genotypes: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68. The data were analyzed using the SG STATS platform. In total, 4,244 (13.94%) were positive: 3,290 (77.52%) showed a single genotype infection and 954 (22.48%) an infection with 2 to 5 different genotypes. In 721 (75.60%) cases, two different genotypes were detected, in 191 (20.00%) there were three genotypes, in 41 (4.30%) cases there were four genotypes and in only one case (0.10%) five different genotypes were detected. HPV 16 (262 cases of co-infections) was associated in 27 cases with HPV 31 genotype, in 25 cases with HPV 68 and in 18 cases with HPV 58. HPV 16 was the most frequent genotype detected in co-infections. Immunity status, vaccination, lifestyle, and other possible risk factors, such as the combination of the HR-HPV genotype multiple infections, may influence the development and progression of the disease.

Differences between men and women with respect to colorectal cancer mortality despite screening colonoscopy

Background and study aimsWomen aged 55 to 59 years have a similar prevalence rate and number needed to screen for colorectal adenomas as men at a ten years younger age.The aim of this study was to determine sex specific differences in colorectal cancer mortality and estimate the association with adenomas at screening colonoscopy. MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 323,139 individuals who underwent colonoscopy within a national colorectal cancer screening program in Austria between 01/2007 and 12/2020. ResultsMedian age was (60 years [IQR 54-67]) and sex distribution in all age groups was nearly identical. Men had significantly higher odds to have an adenoma or serrated polyp, low risk polyps, high-risk polyps, or colorectal cancer detected at colonoscopy than women (OR 1.83 [1.80-1.86], OR 1.46 [1.44-1.49], OR 1.74 [1.69-1.80], and OR 1.87 [1.70-2.05] respectively). Strikingly, male sex, when compared to female sex, was associated with an almost 2-fold (HR 1.67 [1.05-2.67]) increased risk to die from colorectal cancer when an adenoma or serrated polyp, and a 4-fold (HR 4.14 [2.72-6.3]) increased risk when a high-risk polyp was found at the screening colonoscopy. The cumulative incidence for death of colorectal cancer for 60-year-old individuals was 8.5-fold higher in men as compared to women. Markedly, this gender gap narrowed with increasing age while the difference in deaths of other causes remained similar in all age groups. ConclusionOur findings strengthen the necessity of sex specific screening recommendations.Importantly, further prospective studies should focus on sex difference in tumor biology to propose personalized surveillance guidelines.

Cost-Utility Analysis for Colorectal Cancer Screening According to the Initiating Age of National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.

This study aimed to identify the most cost-effective strategy for colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), focusing on screening initiation age in Korea. We designed Markov simulation models targeting individuals aged 40 years or older. Twelve strategies combining screening initiation ages (40, 45, or 50 years old), termination ages (80 or no limit), and intervals (1 or 2 years) were modeled, and the most cost-effective strategy was selected. The robustness of the results was confirmed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of the qualitative and quantitative FIT methods was verified using scenario analysis. The 2-year interval strategy with a screening age range of 45-80 years was the most cost-effective (incremental cost-utility ratio = KRW 7,281,646/quality adjusted life years). The most sensitive variables in the results were transition rate from advanced adenoma to local cancer and discount rate. The uncertainty in the model was substantially low. Moreover, strategies starting at the age of 40 years were also cost-effective but considered suboptimal. The scenario analysis showed that there was no significant difference in cost-effectiveness between strategies with various relative screening ratio of quantitative and qualitative method. The screening method for advancing the initiation age, as presented in the 2015 revised national screening recommendations, was superior regarding cost-effectiveness. This study provides a new paradigm for the development of a national cancer screening system in Korea, which can be utilized as a scientific basis for economic evaluations.

The Impact of Neighborhood Deprivation on the Survival Rates of Patients with Cancer in Korea.

The objective of this study is to investigate the correlation between the neighborhood deprivation index and survival rates of cancer patients in Korea. In this study, 5-year age-standardized survival rates of patients with cancer were determined using the National Cancer Cohort from 2014 to 2018 in Korea. The primary cancer sites were the stomach, colorectum, liver, lung, breast, cervix, prostate, and thyroid. Disparities were measured, and their impact on the overall survival rates was assessed using the Korean version of the Neighborhood Deprivation Index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the strength of the correlation. The study cohort comprised 726,665 patients with cancer, of whom 50.7% were male. The predominant primary cancer sites were the stomach (n = 138,462), colorectum (n = 125,156), and thyroid gland (n = 120,886). Urban residents showed better survival outcomes than those situated in rural areas. The most deprived quartile had the lowest survival rate, while the least deprived quartile had the highest (p < 0.001). Most cancer types revealed significant correlations between neighborhood deprivation and 5-year age-standardized overall survival, with lung cancer showing the most substantial negative correlation (r = -0.510), followed by prostate cancer (r = -0.438). However, thyroid cancer showed only a marginal correlation (p = 0.069). The results of this study suggested that neighborhood deprivation is closely linked to disparities in overall survival across various types of cancer. A substantial negative correlation between the neighborhood deprivation index and all-cause mortality for lung and prostate cancer, as compared to breast and cervical cancers covered by the National Cancer Screening Program, may reinforce the need to address healthcare access and improve the early detection of cancer in socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods.

Temporal trends in age- and stage-specific incidence of colorectal adenocarcinomas in Germany

BackgroundA national colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme was launched in 2002 in Germany. A comprehensive evaluation of the programme effectiveness using real-world data is still lacking. In addition, there are regional reports on increasing colorectal cancer incidence in younger populations. Therefore, we aimed to describe and compare the overall, age- and stage-specific incidence trends for colorectal, colon and rectal cancer.MethodsWe used data from seven population-based cancer registries in Germany. We report absolute and relative changes in incidence rates between the early screening phase (2003–2005) and the most recent time period available (2015–2017), as well as annual percent changes. We analysed incidences according to tumour site (colorectum, colon, and rectum) and to six age groups (young adults: 15–34, 35–39, 40–49, screening-entitled/older adults: 50–54, 55–69 and 70 + years old).ResultsIn our sample of 271,011 colorectal adenocarcinomas, about two-thirds were located in the colon and 95% of them occurred in the age group 50+ (50–54: 5%, 55–69: 32.8%, 70+: 57.2%). For the time period 2003–2005 the age-specific incidence rates of individuals in the age group 55–69 were about 76/100,00 for colon and 54/100,000 for rectal cancer (age group 70 + colon: 179/100,000; rectum: 84/100,000). The incidence rates in young adults were less than 13% of that of individuals in the age group 55–69 (< 5% of individuals aged 70+; <33% of individuals aged 50–54).Over time, incidence decreased in individuals at the age of 55+, for all subsites considered as well as for early and late stage cancers (with few exceptions), while incidence of young adult CRC (both early and late stage) increased steepest in the youngest age groups. For late stage rectal cancer, a shift was observed in all age groups from UICC stage IV to stage III being the most frequent stage.ConclusionsSix years after the introduction of the national colonoscopy screening program, late stage CRC incidence began to decline substantially in the screening-eligible age groups (55-69, 70+). It is likely that this decline and the increase in early stage CRC observed in younger age groups can be attributed to the program. Long lasting public awareness campaigns for CRC screening might have led to opportunistic screening in younger adults. Whether these benefits outweigh the possible harm of screening in younger age groups remains unclear.