Naked DNA Templates Research Articles

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) passage through nucleosomes depends on Pol I subunits binding its lobe structure

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is a highly efficient enzyme specialized in synthesizing most ribosomal RNAs. After nucleosome deposition at each round of rDNA replication, the Pol I transcription machinery has to deal with nucleosomal barriers. It has been suggested that Pol I-associated factors facilitate chromatin transcription, but it is unknown whether Pol I has an intrinsic capacity to transcribe through nucleosomes. Here, we used in vitro transcription assays to study purified WT and mutant Pol I variants from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and compare their abilities to pass a nucleosomal barrier with those of yeast Pol II and Pol III. Under identical conditions, purified Pol I and Pol III, but not Pol II, could transcribe nucleosomal templates. Pol I mutants lacking either the heterodimeric subunit Rpa34.5/Rpa49 or the C-terminal part of the specific subunit Rpa12.2 showed a lower processivity on naked DNA templates, which was even more reduced in the presence of a nucleosome. Our findings suggest that the lobe-binding subunits Rpa34.5/Rpa49 and Rpa12.2 facilitate passage through nucleosomes, suggesting possible cooperation among these subunits. We discuss the contribution of Pol I-specific subunit domains to efficient Pol I passage through nucleosomes in the context of transcription rate and processivity.

In vitro assembly and proteomic analysis of RNA polymerase II complexes.

The RNA polymerase II (RNApII) transcription cycle consists of multiple steps involving dozens of protein factors. Here we describe a useful approach to study the dynamics of initiation and early elongation, comprising an in vitro transcription system in which complexes are assembled on immobilized DNA templates and analyzed by quantitative mass spectrometry. This unbiased screening system allows quantitation of RNApII complex components on either naked DNA or chromatin templates. In addition to transcription, the system reproduces co-transcriptional mRNA capping and multiple transcription-related histone modifications. In combination with other biochemical and genetic methods, this approach can provide insights into the mechanistic details of gene expression by RNApII.

Arabidopsis Pol II-Dependent in Vitro Transcription System Reveals Role of Chromatin for Light-Inducible rbcS Gene Transcription.

In vitro transcription is an essential tool to study the molecular mechanisms of transcription. For over a decade, we have developed an in vitro transcription system from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)-cultured cells (BY-2), and this system supported the basic activities of the three RNA polymerases (Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III). However, it was not suitable to study photosynthetic genes, because BY-2 cells have lost their photosynthetic activity. Therefore, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) in vitro transcription systems were developed from green and etiolated suspension cells. Sufficient in vitro Pol II activity was detected after the minor modification of the nuclear soluble extracts preparation method; removal of vacuoles from protoplasts and L-ascorbic acid supplementation in the extraction buffer were particularly effective. Surprisingly, all four Arabidopsis Rubisco small subunit (rbcS-1A, rbcS-1B, rbcS-2B, and rbcS-3B) gene members were in vitro transcribed from the naked DNA templates without any light-dependent manner. However, clear light-inducible transcriptions were observed using chromatin template of rbcS-1A gene, which was prepared with a human nucleosome assembly protein 1 (hNAP1) and HeLa histones. This suggested that a key determinant of light-dependency through the rbcS gene transcription was a higher order of DNA structure (i.e. chromatin).

Base excision repair in chromatin: Insights from reconstituted systems.

The process of base excision repair has been completely reconstituted in vitro and structural and biochemical properties of the component enzymes thoroughly studied on naked DNA templates. More recent work in this field aims to understand how BER operates on the natural substrate, chromatin [1,2]. Toward this end, a number of researchers, including the Smerdon group, have focused attention to understand how individual enzymes and reconstituted BER operate on nucleosome substrates. While nucleosomes were once thought to completely restrict access of DNA-dependent factors, the surprising finding from these studies suggests that at least some BER components can utilize target DNA bound within nucleosomes as substrates for their enzymatic processes. This data correlates well with both structural studies of these enzymes and our developing understanding of nucleosome conformation and dynamics. While more needs to be learned, these studies highlight the utility of reconstituted BER and chromatin systems to inform our understanding of in vivo biological processes.

Binding of NF-κB to Nucleosomes: Effect of Translational Positioning, Nucleosome Remodeling and Linker Histone H1

NF-κB is a key transcription factor regulating the expression of inflammatory responsive genes. How NF-κB binds to naked DNA templates is well documented, but how it interacts with chromatin is far from being clear. Here we used a combination of UV laser footprinting, hydroxyl footprinting and electrophoretic mobility shift assay to investigate the binding of NF-κB to nucleosomal templates. We show that NF-κB p50 homodimer is able to bind to its recognition sequence, when it is localized at the edge of the core particle, but not when the recognition sequence is at the interior of the nucleosome. Remodeling of the nucleosome by the chromatin remodeling machine RSC was not sufficient to allow binding of NF-κB to its recognition sequence located in the vicinity of the nucleosome dyad, but RSC-induced histone octamer sliding allowed clearly detectable binding of NF-κB with the slid particle. Importantly, nucleosome dilution-driven removal of H2A–H2B dimer led to complete accessibility of the site located close to the dyad to NF-κB. Finally, we found that NF-κB was able to displace histone H1 and prevent its binding to nucleosome. These data provide important insight on the role of chromatin structure in the regulation of transcription of NF-κB dependent genes.

Biochemical Analysis of Histone Deacetylase-independent Transcriptional Repression by MeCP2

MeCP2 is an abundant methyl-cytosine-guanine (CG)-binding protein and transcriptional repressor. We developed a biochemical system that exhibits CG methylation-specific transcriptional repression by purified human MeCP2. MeCP2 represses transcription by histone deacetylase (HDAC)-dependent and HDAC-independent mechanisms. Our system appears to recreate the HDAC-independent component of MeCP2-mediated repression and occurs via inhibition of the assembly of transcription preinitiation complexes. At a ratio of approximately one molecule of MeCP2 per two methyl-CG dinucleotides, as found in mammalian neurons, the magnitude of methylation-specific repression was greater than 10-fold. Notably, the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A had no effect on MeCP2-mediated repression with either naked DNA or chromatin templates. We designed a CG-deficient core promoter that is resistant to MeCP2-mediated repression when placed in a plasmid lacking CG dinucleotides. By using this CG-deficient reporter as a reference, we found that eight CG dinucleotides in the core promoter region are sufficient for strong methylation-specific repression by MeCP2. In contrast, MeCP2 does not repress a construct with 13 CG dinucleotides located ∼1.7 kbp upstream of the promoter. Furthermore, by analysis of C-terminally truncated MeCP2 proteins, we found that binding of MeCP2 to methyl-CG dinucleotides is not sufficient for transcriptional repression. Hence, MeCP2-mediated repression is not due to the simple steric blockage of the transcriptional machinery. These experiments suggest that MeCP2 can function as a global methyl-CG-specific, HDAC-independent repressor. This HDAC-independent mechanism of MeCP2-mediated repression may be important in cells, such as mammalian neurons, that have high levels of CG methylation and MeCP2.

Proteomic Analysis Demonstrates Activator- and Chromatin-specific Recruitment to Promoters

In-depth characterization of RNA polymerase II preinitiation complexes remains an important and challenging goal. We used quantitative mass spectrometry to explore context-dependent Saccharomyces cerevisiae preinitiation complex formation at the HIS4 promoter reconstituted on naked and chromatinized DNA templates. The transcription activators Gal4-VP16 and Gal4-Gcn4 recruited a limited set of chromatin-related coactivator complexes, namely the chromatin remodeler Swi/Snf and histone acetyltransferases SAGA and NuA4, suggesting that transcription stimulation is mediated through these factors. Moreover, the two activators differentially recruited the coactivator complexes, consistent with specific activator-coactivator interactions. Chromatinized templates suppressed recruitment of basal transcription factors, thereby amplifying the effect of activators, compared with naked DNA templates. This system is sensitive, highly reproducible, and easily applicable to mapping the repertoire of proteins found at any promoter.

The adenovirus E1A N-terminal repression domain represses transcription from a chromatin template in vitro

The adenovirus repression domain of E1A 243R at the E1A N-terminus (E1A 1–80) transcriptionally represses genes involved in differentiation and cell cycle progression. E1A 1–80 represses transcription in vitro from naked DNA templates through its interaction with p300 and TFIID. E1A 1–80 can also interact with several chromatin remodeling factors and associates with chromatin in vivo. We show here that E1A 243R and E1A 1–80 can repress transcription from a reconstituted chromatin template in vitro. Temporal analysis reveals strong repression by E1A 1–80 when added at pre-activation, activation and early transcription stages. Interestingly, E1A 1–80 can greatly enhance transcription from chromatin templates, but not from naked DNA, when added at pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation and transcription-initiation stages. These data reveal a new dimension for E1A 1–80's interface with chromatin and may reflect its interaction with key players in PIC formation, p300 and TFIID, and/or possibly a role in chromatin remodeling.

In Vitro Transcription and Immobilized Template Analysis of Preinitiation Complexes

In the study of gene regulation, it is often necessary to employ functional assays that investigate the action or mechanism of specific promoters or enhancer-binding factors and their role in transcription by RNA polymerase II. Although many assays measure the transcription of a gene under the control of an endogenous or model activator in vivo, it is often useful to recreate transcription in vitro in order to study specific regulatory mechanisms. In this unit, protocols are presented that will allow the investigator to perform in vitro transcription using preinitiation complexes assembled from cellular extracts on either naked DNA or chromatin templates.

Tetra-O-methyl nordihydroguaiaretic acid (Terameprocol) inhibits the NF-κB-dependent transcription of TNF-α and MCP-1/CCL2 genes by preventing RelA from binding its cognate sites on DNA

BackgroundTetra-O-methyl nordihydroguaiaretic acid, also known as terameprocol (TMP), is a naturally occurring phenolic compound found in the resin of the creosote bush. We have shown previously that TMP will suppress production of certain inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and lipids from macrophages following stimulation with LPS or infection with H1N1 influenza virus. In this study our goal was to elucidate the mechanism underlying TMP-mediated suppression of cytokine and chemokine production. We focused our investigations on the response to LPS and the NF-κB protein RelA, a transcription factor whose activity is critical to LPS-responsiveness.MethodsReporter assays were performed with HEK293 cells overexpressing either TLR-3, -4, or -8 and a plasmid containing the luciferase gene under control of an NF-κB response element. Cells were then treated with LPS, poly(I:C), or resiquimod, and/or TMP, and lysates measured for luciferase activity.RAW 264.7 cells treated with LPS and/or TMP were used in ChIP and EMSA assays. For ChIP assays, chromatin was prepared and complexes precipitated with anti-NF-κB RelA Ab. Cross-links were reversed, DNA purified, and sequence abundance determined by Q-PCR. For EMSA assays, nuclear extracts were incubated with radiolabeled probes, analyzed by non-denaturing PAGE and visualized by autoradiography.RAW 264.7 cells treated with LPS and/or TMP were also used in fluorescence microscopy and western blot experiments. Translocation experiments were performed using a primary Ab to NF-κB RelA and a fluorescein-conjugated secondary Ab. Western blots were performed using Abs to IκB-α and phospho-IκB-α. Bands were visualized by chemiluminescence.ResultsIn reporter assays with TLR-3, -4, and -8 over-expressing cells, TMP caused strong inhibition of NF-κB-dependent transcription.ChIP assays showed TMP caused virtually complete inhibition of RelA binding in vivo to promoters for the genes for TNF-α, MCP-1/CCL2, and RANTES/CCL5 although the LPS-dependent synthesis of IκB-α was not inhibited. EMSA assays did not reveal an effect of TMP on the binding of RelA to naked DNA templates in vitro.TMP did not inhibit the nuclear translocation of NF-κB RelA nor the phosphorylation of IκB-α.ConclusionTMP acts indirectly as an inhibitor of NF-κB-dependent transcription by preventing RelA from binding the promoters of certain key cytokine and chemokine genes.

The dimerization domain of SOX9 is required for transcription activation of a chondrocyte-specific chromatin DNA template

Mutations in SOX9, a gene essential for chondrocyte differentiation cause the human disease campomelic dysplasia (CD). To understand how SOX9 activates transcription, we characterized the DNA binding and cell-free transcription ability of wild-type SOX9 and a dimerization domain SOX9 mutant. Whereas formation of monomeric mutant SOX9–DNA complex increased linearly with increasing SOX9 concentrations, formation of a wild-type SOX9–DNA dimeric complex increased more slowly suggesting a more sigmoidal-type progression. Stability of SOX9–DNA complexes, however, was unaffected by the dimerization mutation. Both wild-type and mutant SOX9 activated transcription of a naked Col2a1 DNA template. However, after nucleosomal assembly, only wild-type and not the mutant was able to remodel chromatin and activate transcription of this template. Using a cell line, in which the Col2a1 vector was stably integrated, no differences were seen in the interactions of wild-type and mutant SOX9 with the chromatin of the Col2a1 vector using ChIP. However, the mutant was unable to activate transcription in agreement with in vitro results. We hypothesize that the SOX9 dimerization domain is necessary to remodel the Col2a1 chromatin in order to allow transcription to take place. These results further clarify the mechanism that accounts for CD in patients harboring SOX9 dimerization domain mutations.

Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Modulate β-Cell Chromatin Structure

Chromatin can exert a regulatory effect on gene transcription by modulating the access of transcription factors to target genes. In the present study, we examined whether nuclear actions of the incretin hormones, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1, involve modulation of beta-cell chromatin structure. Stimulation of INS-1(832/13) beta-cells or dispersed mouse islets with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide or glucagon-like peptide-1 resulted in the post-translational modification of core H3 histones, through acetylation and phosphorylation. Both increased histone H3 acetyltransferase and reduced histone deacetylase activities contributed. Subsequent studies demonstrated that incretin-mediated histone H3 modifications involved activation of protein kinase A, p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and p38 MAPK signaling modules, resulting in the activation of mitogen- and stress-activated kinase-1. Additionally, modification of histone H3 increased its association with the transcription factor, phosphorylated cAMP-response element-binding protein (phospho-CREB) and with cAMP-responsive CREB coactivator 2. Incretin-activated CREB-related Bcl-2 transcription was greatly reduced by a histone acetyltransferase inhibitor, demonstrating the functional importance of histone H3 modification. This appears to be the first demonstration of beta-cell chromatin modification in response to the incretins and the studies indicate that their regulatory effects involve coordinated nuclear interactions between specific signaling modules, chromatin-modifying enzymes and transcription factors.

Heterochromatin tells CENP‐A where to go

The centromere is the region of the chromosome where the kinetochore forms. Kinetochores are the attachment sites for spindle microtubules that separate duplicated chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis. Kinetochore formation depends on a special chromatin structure containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A. The epigenetic mechanisms that maintain CENP-A chromatin throughout the cell cycle have been studied extensively but little is known about the mechanism that targets CENP-A to naked centromeric DNA templates. In a recent report published in Science, such de novo centromere assembly of CENP-A is shown to be dependent on heterochromatin and the RNA interference pathway.

Smads orchestrate specific histone modifications and chromatin remodeling to activate transcription.

Smads are intracellular transducers for TGF-beta superfamily ligands, but little is known about the mechanism by which complexes of receptor-phosphorylated Smad2 and Smad4 regulate transcription. Using an in vitro transcription system, we have discovered that, unlike most transcription factors that are sufficient to recruit the basal transcription machinery and therefore activate transcription on both naked DNA and chromatin templates, the Smads only activate transcription from chromatin templates. We demonstrate that Smad2-mediated transcription requires the histone acetyltransferase, p300. Smad2-recruited p300 exhibits an altered substrate specificity, specifically acetylating nucleosomal histone H3 at lysines 9 and 18, and these modifications are also detected on an endogenous Smad2-dependent promoter in a ligand-induced manner. Furthermore, we show that endogenous Smad2 interacts with the SWI/SNF ATPase, Brg1, in a TGF-beta-dependent manner, and demonstrate that Brg1 is recruited to Smad2-dependent promoters and is specifically required for TGF-beta-induced expression of endogenous Smad2 target genes. Our data indicate that the Smads define a new class of transcription factors that absolutely require chromatin to assemble the basal transcription machinery and activate transcription.

A Mechanism for Coordinating Chromatin Modification and Preinitiation Complex Assembly

Transcription of eukaryotic genes within a chromatin environment requires the sequential recruitment of histone modification enzymes and the general transcription factors (GTFs) by activators. However, it is unknown how preinitiation complex assembly is coordinated with chromatin modification. Here, we show that the model activator GAL4-VP16 directs the ordered assembly of Mediator, histone acetyltransferases (HATs), and GTFs onto immobilized chromatin and naked DNA templates in vitro. Using purified proteins, we found that the Mediator regulates this assembly process by binding to p300 and TFIID. An acetyl-CoA-dependent catalytic switch causes p300 to acetylate chromatin and then dissociate. Dissociation of p300 enhances TFIID binding and active transcription. The dissociation is caused by an autoacetylation-induced conformational change in the catalytic domain of p300. We conclude that autoacetylation-induced dissociation of p300 acts as a catalytic switch, which allows TFIID binding and subsequent preinitiation complex assembly.

The Swi2/Snf2 Bromodomain Is Required for the Displacement of SAGA and the Octamer Transfer of SAGA-acetylated Nucleosomes

The SWI/SNF and SAGA chromatin-modifying complexes contain bromodomains that help anchor these complexes to acetylated promoter nucleosomes. To study the importance of bromodomains in these complexes, we have compared the chromatin-remodeling and octamer-transfer activity of the SWI/SNF complex to a mutant complex that lacks the Swi2/Snf2 bromodomain. Here we show that the SWI/SNF complex can remodel or transfer SAGA-acetylated nucleosomes more efficiently than the Swi2/Snf2 bromodomain-deleted complex. These results demonstrate that the Swi2/Snf2 bromodomain is important for the remodeling as well as for the octamer-transfer activity of the complex on H3-acetylated nucleosomes. Moreover, we show that, although the wild-type SWI/SNF complex displaces SAGA that is bound to acetylated nucleosomes, the bromodomain mutant SWI/SNF complex is less efficient in SAGA displacement. Thus, the Swi2/Snf2 bromodomain is required for the full functional activity of SWI/SNF on acetylated nucleosomes and is important for the displacement of SAGA from acetylated promoter nucleosomes.

Analysis of chromatin unwinding by the UvrD DNA helicase

In an effort to understand how nuclear processes occur in the context of repressive chromatin structures found in vivo, we have investigated the ability of the E. coli UvrD helicase to unwind nucleosomal substrates in vitro. UvrD is a DNA repair helicase whose eukaryotic functional counterpart is defective in the skin cancer disorder, Xeroderma Pigmentosum. Model chromatin templates containing the 5S nucleosome positioning sequence were generated that include linear mononucleosomes and subsaturated nucleosomal arrays. UvrD was incubated with naked and nucleosomal DNA templates in the presence of MgATP, and then ssDNA products were separated from dsDNA substrates using native PAGE followed by detection and quantitation via Southern Blotting and phosphorimaging. Our results demonstrate that UvrD can unwind mononucleosomal DNA to similar extents (100%) as the corresponding naked DNA template. UvrD also unwound nucleosomal arrays that were 70% saturated, to reduced extents (50%). Above this nucleosome loading level, unwinding was significantly reduced, indicating a threshold level for nucleosome-imposed steric inhibition of helicase-promoted unwinding. Histone acetylation had no effect on extents of unwinding of chromatin substrates. We are currently trying to image UvrD in the process of unwinding chromatin using atomic force microscopy. These studies will help establish how helicases contend with chromatin structure and what mechanisms the cell uses to modify chromatin structure so that DNA-related enzymes can gain access to them. The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support provided by Midwestern University.

Influence of Chromatin and Single Strand Binding Proteins on the Activity of an Archaeal MCM

The mini-chromosome maintenance (MCM) complex is the presumptive replicative helicase in archaea and eukaryotes. In archaea, the MCM is a homo-multimer, in eukaryotes a heterohexamer composed of six related subunits, MCM 2-7. Biochemical studies using naked DNA templates have revealed that archaeal MCMs and a sub-complex of eukaryotic MCM 4, 6 and 7 have 3' to 5' helicase activity. Here, we investigate the influence of the major chromatin proteins, Alba and Sul7d, of Sulfolobus solfataricus (Sso) on the ability of the MCM complex to melt partial duplex DNA substrates. In addition, we test the effect of Sso SSB on MCM activity. We reveal that Alba represents a formidable barrier to MCM activity and further demonstrate that acetylation of Alba alleviates repression of MCM activity.

The tumor suppressor protein p53 functions similarly to p63 and p73 in activating transcription in vitro

The p53 tumor suppressor protein functions via specific gene activation to inhibit passage through the cell cycle and to trigger apoptosis. The p53 protein is homologous to p63 and p73, proteins that regulate transcription via the same promoter sequences but which activate different genes. In this study we tested whether p53, p63, and p73 have different mechanisms of activating transcription and if such a difference could explain how each factor stimulates the transcription of distinct sets of genes. We found that when comparing p53 to the transcriptional activator, GAL4-VP16, both of which are classified as acidic activators, that stimulation of transcription by p53 is dependent upon low Mg2+ concentrations and limiting amounts of extract. By comparison, the stimulation of RNA synthesis by GAL4-VP16 was not dependent on a specific concentration of Mg2+ but did require higher amounts of extract, suggesting that a certain factor not required for p53- dependent gene activation was limiting in the extract. In contrast to the differences between p53 and GAL4-VP16, p63 and p73 both regulated transcription in vitro under similar conditions as did p53. All three proteins, purified to near homogeneity, were equally active in binding to the p53-response element, and equally active in stimulating transcription reactions using naked DNA templates, DNA templates reconstituted in chromatin using histones purified from HeLa cells, or hyperacetylated histones. These results argue that the gene specificity of p63 and p73 dependent activation of transcription depends upon specific coactivators present in the specific cell types and upon other factors bound to the promoters.

Nuclear actin and myosin I are required for RNA polymerase I transcription

The presence of actin and nuclear myosin I (NMI) in the nucleus suggests a role for these motor proteins in nuclear functions. We have investigated the role of actin and nuclear myosin I (NMI) in the transcription of ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA). Both proteins are associated with rDNA and are required for RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcription. Microinjection of antibodies against actin or NMI, as well as short interfering RNA-mediated depletion of NMI, decreased Pol I transcription in vivo, whereas overexpression of NMI augmented pre-rRNA synthesis. In vitro, recombinant NMI activated Pol I transcription, and antibodies to NMI or actin inhibited Pol I transcription both on naked DNA and pre-assembled chromatin templates. Whereas actin associated with Pol I, NMI bound to Pol I through the transcription-initiation factor TIF-IA. The association with Pol I requires phosphorylation of TIF-IA at Ser 649 by RSK kinase, indicating a role for NMI in the growth-dependent regulation of rRNA synthesis.