Nafamostat Mesylate Research Articles

Usage of nafamostat mesylate during continuous renal replacement therapy and filter life: a scoping review

Usage of nafamostat mesylate during continuous renal replacement therapy and filter life: a scoping review

The role of nafamostat mesylate anticoagulation in continuous kidney replacement therapy for critically ill patients with bleeding tendencies: a retrospective study on patient outcomes and safety.

Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is crucial in the management of acute kidney injury in intensive care units (ICUs). Nonetheless, the optimal anticoagulation strategy for patients with bleeding tendencies remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate patient outcomes and safety of nafamostat mesylate (NM) compared with no anticoagulation (NA) in critically ill patients with bleeding tendencies who were undergoing CKRT. This retrospective study enrolled 2,313 patients who underwent CKRT between March 2013 and December 2022 at the third affiliated hospital in South Korea. After applying the exclusion criteria, 490 patients were included in the final analysis, with 245 patients in the NM and NA groups each, following 1:1 propensity score matching. Subsequently, in-hospital mortality, incidence of bleeding complications, agranulocytosis, hyperkalemia, and length of hospital stay were assessed. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the lengths of hospital and ICU stays or the incidence of agranulocytosis and hyperkalemia. The NM group showed a smaller decrease in hemoglobin levels during CKRT (-1.90 g/dL vs. -2.39 g/dL) and less need for blood product transfusions than the NA group. Furthermore, the NM group exhibited a survival benefit in patients who required transfusion of all three blood products. NM is an effective and safe anticoagulant for CKRT in critically ill patients, especially those requiring transfusion of all three blood products. Although these findings are promising, further multicenter studies are needed to validate them and explore the mechanisms underlying the observed benefits.

Nafamostat mesylate has advantages as an anticoagulant for patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis with conjunctival bleeding.

Nafamostat mesylate has advantages as an anticoagulant for patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis with conjunctival bleeding.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Nafamostat Mesylate in the Treatment of COVID-19: a Meta-Analysis.

Nafamostat mesylate, a synthetic serine protease inhibitor, has been shown to have antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 and anticoagulant properties that may be beneficial in the treatment of COVID-19. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nafamostat mesylate for the treatment of COVID-19. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, medRxiv, and bioRxiv were searched up to July 2023 for studies comparing the outcomes of nafamostat mesylate treatment and no nafamostat mesylate treatment in patients with COVID-19. Mortality, disease progression, and adverse events were analyzed. Six studies involving 16,195 patients were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.20-3.75, P = 0.86) or disease progression (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 0.31-24.68, P = 0.36) between groups. However, nafamostat mesylate was associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia (OR: 7.15, 95% CI: 2.66-19.24, P < 0.0001). Nafamostat mesylate did not improve mortality or morbidity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The risk of hyperkalemia is a serious concern that requires monitoring and preventive measures. Further research in different COVID-19 populations is required.

A case of abdominal aortic aneurysm presenting as symptomatic disseminated intravascular coagulation treated with endovascular aneurysm repair and postoperative administration of Nafamostat mesylate

BackgroundCases of abdominal aortic aneurysm discovered as purpura on the extremities with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are rare. The number of currently established strategies for the control of DIC with aortic aneurysm is limited.Case presentationAn 85-year-old woman was referred to the hematology department because of purpura on her shoulder and thigh. Enhanced fibrinolytic-type DIC was diagnosed by a blood test. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed 60-mm abdominal aortic and 42-mm right common iliac aneurysms. We performed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and coiling of the right internal iliac artery with postoperative administration of Nafamostat mesylate. The patient promptly recovered from DIC, and the purpura gradually disappeared.ConclusionsWe safely performed EVAR with postoperative administration of Nafamostat mesylate for an abdominal aortic aneurysms that presented as symptomatic DIC.

Nafamostat mesylate decreases skin flap necrosis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes by protecting the endothelial glycocalyx

The success rate of flap tissue reconstruction has increased in recent years owing to advancements in microsurgical techniques. However, complications, such as necrosis, are still more prevalent in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic individuals, presenting an ongoing challenge. To address this issue, many previous studies have examined vascular anastomoses dilation and stability, primarily concerning surgical techniques or drugs. In contrast, in the present study, we focused on microvascular damage of the peripheral microvessels in patients with diabetes mellitus and the preventative impact of nafamostat mesylate. Herein, we aimed to investigate the effects of hyperglycemia on glycocalyx (GCX) levels in mice with type 2 diabetes. We examined the endothelial GCX (eGCX) in skin flap tissue of 9–12-week-old type 2 diabetic mice (db/db mice) using a perforator skin flap and explored treatment with nafamostat mesylate. The growth rates were compared after 1 week. Heterotype (db/+) mice were used as the control group. Morphological examination of postoperative tissues was performed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days post-surgery. In addition, db/db mice were treated with 30 mg/kg/day of nafamostat mesylate daily and were evaluated on postoperative day 7. Seven days after surgery, all db/db mice showed significant partial flap necrosis. Temporal observation of the skin flaps revealed a stasis-like discoloration and necrosis starting from the contralateral side of the remaining perforating branch. The control group did not exhibit flap necrosis, and the flap remained intact. In the quantitative assessment of endothelial glycans using lectins, intensity scoring showed that the eGCX in the db/db group was significantly thinner than that in the db/+ group. These results were consistent with the scanning electron microscopy findings. In contrast, treatment with nafamostat mesylate significantly improved the flap engraftment rate and suppressed eGCX injury. In conclusion, treatment with nafamostat mesylate improves the disrupted eGCX structure of skin flap tissue in db/db mice, potentially ameliorating the impaired capillary-to-venous return in the skin flap tissue.

Dose of nafamostat mesylate during continuous kidney replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a two-centre observational study

BackgroundNafamostat mesylate is an anticoagulant used for critically ill patients during continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), characterised by its short half-life. However, its optimal dosage remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the optimal dosage of nafamostat mesylate during CKRT.MethodsWe conducted a two-centre observational study. We screened all critically ill adult patients who required CKRT in the intensive care unit (ICU) from September 2013 to August 2021; we included patients aged ≥ 18 years who received nafamostat mesylate during CKRT. The primary outcome was filter life, defined as the time from CKRT initiation to the end of the first filter use due to filter clotting. The secondary outcomes included safety and other clinical outcomes. The survival analysis of filter patency by the nafamostat mesylate dosage adjusted for bleeding risk and haemofiltration was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsWe included 269 patients. The mean dose of nafamostat mesylate was 15.8 mg/hr (Standard deviation (SD), 8.8; range, 5.0 to 30.0), and the median filter life was 18.3 h (Interquartile range (IQR), 9.28 to 36.7). The filter survival analysis showed no significant association between the filter life and nafamostat mesylate dosage (hazard ratio 1.12; 95 CI 0.74–1.69, p = 0.60) after adjustment for bleeding risk and addition of haemofiltration to haemodialysis.ConclusionsWe observed no dose-response relationship between the dose of nafamostat mesylate (range: 5 to 30 mg/h) and the filter life during CKRT in critically ill patients. The optimal dose to prevent filter clotting safely needs further study in randomised controlled trials.Trial registrationNot applicable.

Organotypic lung tissue culture as a preclinical model to study host- influenza A viral infection: A case for repurposing of nafamostat mesylate

Reliable and effective models for recapitulation of host-pathogen interactions are imperative for the discovery of potential therapeutics. Ex vivo models can fulfill these requirements as the multicellular native environment in the tissue is preserved and be utilized for toxicology, vaccine, infection and drug efficacy studies due to the presence of immune cells. Drug repurposing involves the identification of new applications for already approved drugs that are not related to the prime medical indication and emerged as a strategy to cope with slow pace of drug discovery due to high costs and necessary phases to reach the patients. Within the scope of the study, broad-spectrum serine protease inhibitor nafamostat mesylate was repurposed to inhibit influenza A infection and evaluated by a translational ex vivo organotypic model, in which human organ-level responses can be achieved in preclinical safety studies of potential antiviral agents, along with in in vitro lung airway culture. The safe doses were determined as 10 µM for in vitro, whereas 22 µM for ex vivo to be applied for evaluation of host-pathogen interactions, which reduced virus infectivity, increased cell/tissue viability, and protected total protein content by reducing cell death with the inflammatory response. When the gene expression levels of specific pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory and cell surface markers involved in antiviral responses were examined, the significant inflammatory response represented by highly elevated mRNA gene expression levels of cytokines and chemokines combined with CDH5 downregulated by 5.1-fold supported the antiviral efficacy of NM and usability of ex vivo model as a preclinical infection model.

Andexanet alpha-induced heparin resistance treated by nafamostat mesylate in a patient undergoing total aortic arch repair for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection: a case report

BackgroundAndexanet alfa, an anti-Xa inhibitor antagonist, induces heparin resistance. Here, we report a case of successful management of cardiopulmonary bypass with andexanet alfa-induced heparin resistance using nafamostat mesylate.Case presentationAn 84-year-old female, with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection, underwent an emergency surgery for total aortic arch replacement. Andexanet alfa 400 mg was administered preoperatively to antagonize edoxaban, an oral Xa inhibitor. Heparin 300 IU/kg was administered before cardiopulmonary bypass, and the activated clotting time (ACT) was 291 s. The ACT was 361 s after another administration of heparin 200 IU/kg. According to our routine therapy for heparin resistance, an initial dose of nafamostat mesylate 10 mg was administered intravenously, followed by a continuous infusion of 20–30 mg/h. The ACT was prolonged to 500 s, and cardiopulmonary bypass was successfully established thereafter.ConclusionsThis case report presents the successful management of cardiopulmonary bypass with andexanet alfa-induced heparin resistance using nafamostat mesilate. This report presents the successful management of cardiopulmonary bypass with andexanet alfa-induced heparin resistance using nafamostat mesilate.

Real-world prescription of anti-COVID-19 drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Japan.

Prescription trends and patterns of anti-COVID-19 drugs in hospitalized patients were examined based on real world data to understand the use of anti-COVID-19 drugs in clinical practice in Japan. The longitudinal and cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing data from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 of the MID-NET® medical information database, which stored the electronic medical records, administrative claim data, and diagnosis procedure combination data of patients in Japan. Hospitalized patients with a COVID-19-related diagnosis who received at least one anti-COVID-19 drug between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021. The following 14 drugs were included in this study: remdesivir, baricitinib, combination product of casirivimab and imdevimab, favipiravir, dexamethasone, ivermectin, azithromycin, nafamostat mesylate, camostat mesylate, ciclesonide, tocilizumab, sarilumab, combination product of lopinavir and ritonavir, and hydroxychloroquine. We identified 5,717 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and prescribed at least one anti-COVID-19 drug. The entire cohort generally included patients over 41-50 years and more males. The most common prescription pattern was dexamethasone monotherapy (22.9%), followed by the concomitant use of remdesivir and dexamethasone (15.0%), azithromycin monotherapy (15.0%), remdesivir monotherapy (10.2%), and nafamostat mesylate monotherapy (8.5%). However, an often prescribed anti-COVID-19 drug differed depending on the period. This study revealed the real-world situation of anti-COVID-19 drug prescriptions in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Japan. A prescribed drug would depend on the latest scientific evidence, such as efficacy, safety, and approval status, at the time of prescription. Understanding the prescription of anti-COVID-19 drugs will be important for providing the most up-to-date treatments to patients and evaluating the benefit and/or risk of anti-COVID-19 drugs based on the utilization of an electronic medical record database.

Nafamostat mesylate versus regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in patients at high risk of bleeding: a retrospective single-center study

PurposeThe choice of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) anticoagulation program for patients at high risk of bleeding has always been a complex problem in clinical practice. Clinical regimens include regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) and nafamostat mesylate (NM). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two anticoagulants for CRRT in patients at high risk of bleeding to guide their clinical use better.Patients and methodsBetween January 2021 and December 2022, 307 patients were screened for this study. Forty-six patients were finally enrolled: 22 in the regional citrate anticoagulation group and 24 in the nafamostat mesylate group. We collected patients’ baseline characteristics, laboratory indicators before CRRT, and CRRT-related data. We then performed a statistical analysis of the data from both groups of patients.ResultsIn our study, the baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups; the baseline laboratory indicators before CRRT of patients in the two groups were not significantly different. The duration of CRRT was 600 min in the regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) group, 615 min in the nafamostat mesylate (NM) group; the success rate was 90.7% in the RCA group, and 85.6% in the NM group, the anticoagulant efficacy between the two groups was comparable. There was no significant difference in the safety of anticoagulation between the two groups. We used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to test whether different anticoagulation methods significantly affected the success rate of CRRT and found no statistical difference between RCA and NM.ConclusionOur study suggests that nafamostat mesylate's anticoagulant efficacy and safety are not inferior to regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in patients at high risk of bleeding.

Efficacy and safety of Nafamostat mesylate in patients with end-stage renal failure.

Recent studies on dialysis anticoagulation therapy in patients with renal failure have shown that Nafamostat mesylate, a broad-spectrum potent serine protease inhibitor, has strong anticoagulation and anti-fiber activity. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nafamostat mesylate in patients with end-stage renal failure. Seventy-five patients with end-stage renal failure who received hemodialysis at our hospital between January 2020 and August 2021 were selected and divided into the observation group (Nafamostat mesylate for injection, n = 33) and control group (heparin sodium injection, n = 32). General patient data, indicators of clinical efficacy, dialyzer hemocoagulation parameters, coagulation function indices, and hemoglobin concentration and platelet count before and after treatment, and the occurrence of adverse reactions after treatment were compared between the two groups. The two groups showed no significant differences in general patient data (P > 0.05). The post-treatment effectiveness rate in the control group was lower than that in the observation group (P < 0.05). The two groups showed no significant difference in the number of patients in grade I (P > 0.05), while the number of patients in grade 0 was lower in the control group, and the number of patients in grades II and III was higher in the control group (P < 0.05). The post-treatment prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, and international normalized ratio values in the control group were higher than those in the observation group, while the fibrinogen level in the control group was lower than that in the observation group (P < 0.05). The two groups showed no significant difference in the platelet count and hemoglobin level before and after treatment (P > 0.05). The total number of post-treatment adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Treatment of patients showing end-stage renal failure with Nafamostat mesylate can significantly improve therapeutic efficacy and has high safety and clinical value.

Nafamostat mesylate sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to carboplatin by promoting the ZNF24-mediated inhibition of WNT2B.

Resistance to chemotherapeutic medicines complicates and eventually kills people with ovarian cancer. Nafamostat mesylate (NM) has been used as an adjuvant therapy to enhance chemotherapy sensitivity in several cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of NM on ovarian cancer cells susceptible to carboplatin (CBP) and to determine the underlying mechanism involved. Herein, qRT-PCR, western blot, and IHC were used to analyze mRNA and protein expression. Cell viability and proliferation were measured using the MTT and colony formation assays. Cell migration and invasion were examined using the Transwell assay. Flow cytometry was employed to detect cell apoptosis. The interaction between zinc finger protein 24 (ZNF24) and wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 2b (WNT2B) was validated via the dual-luciferase reporter and Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. A xenograft nude mouse model was used to assess the effect of NM on CBP sensitivity in vivo. Our results showed that NM intervention inhibited the viability, proliferation, migration, and invasion and facilitated the apoptosis of CBP-resistant ovarian cancer cells. Furthermore, NM sensitized ovarian cancer cells to CBP by upregulating ZNF24. ZNF24 inactivated Wnt/β-catenin signaling by inhibiting the transcription of WNT2B. Additionally, NM enhanced the inhibitory effect of CBP on tumor growth in vivo. Taken together, NM enhanced the CBP sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells by promoting the ZNF24-mediated inactivation of the WNT2B/Wnt/β-catenin axis. These findings suggest a viable treatment approach for improving CBP resistance in ovarian cancer.

Efficacy of nafamostat mesylate in the prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of nafamostat on the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). PubMed, Web of Science, and Ichushi Web were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using nafamostat to prevent PEP. In subgroup analyses, we studied the preventive effects of nafamostat according to the severity of PEP, risk category, and dose. A random-effects model was adopted; heterogeneity between studies was examined using the chi-squared test and I2 statistics. This analysis uses the PRISMA statement as general guidance. 9 RCTs involving 3321 patients were included. The risk of PEP was lower in the nafamostat group than in the control group [4.4% vs. 8.3%, risk ratio (RR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.68]. In subgroup analyses, the protective effects were evident in low-risk patients for PEP before ERCP (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21–0.55). The association between PEP and nafamostat was significant only in patients who developed mild PEP (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.36–0.69). The benefits were independent of the dose. The prophylactic use of nafamostat resulted in a lower risk of PEP. The subgroup analyses suggested uncertain benefits for severe PEP or high-risk patients for PEP. This warrants further investigation through additional RCTs.

Management of cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes in surgery for active infective endocarditis.

Stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are serious complications that are difficult to manage during surgery for active infectious endocarditis (AIE). Relevant society guidelines still recommend delaying the cardiac surgery for AIE with ICH for 4weeks. Some early studies indicated that the mortality rate decreases when cardiac surgery for ICH is delayed. In contrast, some reported that surgical intervention should not be delayed if an early operation is demanded, even in patients with ICH. The current literature on early vs. late surgery for infectious endocarditis (IE) with ICH is conflicting. Changing the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) strategy might be necessary to improve the surgical outcomes of IE with ICH. Some studies reported that cardiac surgery using nafamostat mesylate (NM) as an alternative anticoagulant during CPB was performed successfully. The combination of NM and low-dose heparin was beneficial for early surgery in patients with AIE complicated by cerebral infarction and ICH, without worsening cerebral lesions. In this report, we review and discuss the management of CPB in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke during surgery for AIE.

Filter Lifespan, Treatment Effect, and Influencing Factors of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Severe Burn Patients.

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is often disrupted due to various factors, such as patient-related issues, vascular access complications, treatment plans, and medical staff factors. This unexpected interruption is referred to as non-selective filter stoppage and can result in additional treatment expenses. This study conducted a retrospectively analyzed 501 CRRT filters used in 62 patients with severe burns, lifespan and therapeutic effect of all filters were mainly analyzed, used logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with non-selective cessation filters. Out of 493 filters, 279 cases received heparin (56.60%), the median lifespan of the filter was 14.08 h (25th, 75th quantile: 7.30, 21.50); 128 cases were treated with nafamostat mesylate (26.00%), and the median lifespan of the filter was 16.42 h (10.49, 22.76); 86 cases were treated with sodium citrate (17.40%), and the median lifespan of the filter was 31.06 h (19.25, 48.75). In addition, significant differences were observed in the electrolyte index, renal function index, and procalcitonin levels before and after treatment with a single filter (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that the risk of non-selective cessation of sodium citrate anticoagulants was lower than that of heparin anticoagulation. Overall, CRRT is progressively becoming more prevalent in the treatment of patients with severe burns. The lifespan of individual filters and total patient treatment duration showed a consistent upward trend. The filter's lifespan was notably greater during sodium citrate anticoagulation when compared to nafamostat mesylate and heparin, meanwhile notably reducing the risk of non-selective cessation. Therefore, we recommend sodium citrate for anticoagulation in patients without any contraindications.

Prevention of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy by protecting the endothelial glycocalyx shedding

Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) adversely affects the quality of life and treatment continuity of patients. The endothelial glycocalyx (eGCX) protects nerves from harmful substances released from the capillary vessels, but its role in peripheral neuropathy remains unclear. We investigated the impact of eGCX protection on VIPN. Using a murine model of VIPN, we administered nafamostat mesylate to protect the eGCX shedding, and analyzed the eGCX integrity and manifestation of peripheral neuropathy. Nafamostat treatment suppressed allodynia associated with neuropathy. Additionally, nafamostat administration resulted in the suppression of increased vascular permeability in capillaries of peripheral nerves, further indicating its positive influence on eGCX in VIPN model mice. This study provided the importance of eGCX in VIPN. With the potential for rapid clinical translation through drug repositioning, nafamostat may be a new promising treatment for the prevention of VIPN.

RAndomized Clinical Trial Of NAfamostat Mesylate, A Potent Transmembrane Protease Serine 2 (TMPRSS2) Inhibitor, in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Even though SARS-CoV-2 was declared by WHO as constituting no longer a public health emergency, the development of effective treatments against SARS-CoV-2 infection remains a critical issue to prevent complications, particularly in fragile patients. The protease inhibitor nafamostat, currently used in Japan and Korea for pancreatitis, owing to its anticoagulant properties for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), is appealing for the treatment of COVID-19 infection, because it potently inhibits the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) that, after virus binding to ACE-2, allows virus entry into the cells and replication. Moreover, it could prevent the DIC and pulmonary embolism frequently associated with COVID-19 infection. The goal of the RAndomized Clinical Trial Of NAfamostat (RACONA) study, designed as a prospective randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, was to investigate the efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate (0.10 mg/kg/h iv for 7 days), on top of the optimal treatment, in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. We could screen 131 patients, but due to the predefined strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 15 could be randomized to group 1 (n = 7) or group 2 (n = 8). The results of an ad interim safety analysis showed similar overall trends for variables evaluating renal function, coagulation, and inflammation. No adverse events, including hyperkalemia, were found to be associated with nafamostat. Thus, the RACONA study showed a good safety profile of nafamostat, suggesting that it could be usefully used in COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

The in vitro effect of anticoagulant agents on coagulation and fibrinolysis in the presence of emicizumab in the plasmas from patients with haemophilia A.

Emicizumab is used as hemostatic prophylaxis for patients with hemophilia A (PwHA), irrespective of the presence of inhibitors. Although bacterial infection can lead to a procoagulant state, there is limited information on coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in emicizumab-treated PwHA and on the use of anticoagulants in such cases. We examined whether anticoagulants affect the coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in plasma from PwHA spiked with emicizumab. Plasma from PwHA was in vitro supplemented with emicizumab (50μg/mL; emi-plasma) and anticoagulants (recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM), nafamostat mesylate (NM), unfractionated heparin (UFH), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMH)). PwHA plasma spiked with rFVIII (1 IU/mL) was used as a reference (ref-plasma). The coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in plasma was measured by thrombin and plasmin generation assay (T/P-GA) and clot-fibrinolysis waveform analysis (CFWA). In T/P-GA and CFWA, coagulation potentials (maximum coagulation velocity; |min1|, and peak thrombin; Th-Peak) in plasma rose with increasing concentrations of emicizumab and rFVIII, but fibrinolytic potentials (peak plasmin; Plm-Peak, and maximum fibrinolytic velocity; |FL-min1|) remained unchanged. Adding rTM, NM, and UFH to emi-plasma suppressed coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials, similar to ref-plasma. Regarding the heparin, UFH and LMH inhibited the improved coagulation in emi-plasma. UFH inhibited fibrinolysis as well, but LMH did not. Anticoagulants could exhibit the inhibitory effects on the coagulation and fibrinolysis potentials in plasma from PwHA spiked with emicizumab, similar to those in normal plasma.

Synthesis of cannabidiol-based compounds as ACE2 inhibitors with potential application in the treatment of COVID-19

Cannabis is a general name for plants of the genus Cannabis. Used as fiber, medicine, drug, for religious, therapeutic, and hedonistic purposes along the millenia, it is mostly known for its psychoactive properties. One of its major constituents, cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive substance, among many other biological activities, has shown potential as an anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug. In this work, three derivatives and an analogue of CBD were synthesized, and cell viability and antiviral activities were evaluated. None of the compounds showed cytotoxicity up to a maximum concentration of 100 μM and, in contrast, displayed a significant antiviral activity, superior to remdesivir and nafamostat mesylate, with IC50 values ranging from 9.4 to 1.9 μM. In order to search for a possible molecular target, the inhibitory activity of the compounds against ACE2 was investigated, with expressive results (IC50 ranging from 3.96 μM to 0.01 μM).