NAb-positive Patients Research Articles

Immunogenicity of adalimumab reference product and adalimumab-adbm in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and chronic plaque psoriasis: a pooled analysis of the VOLTAIRE trials

ObjectiveThis post hoc analysis compared the immunogenicity of the biosimilar adalimumab-adbm (Cyltezo) with the adalimumab reference product (RP; Humira) across indications, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn’s disease (CD) and plaque psoriasis (PsO), and by patient sex in the VOLTAIRE trials programme.MethodsIn each active-comparator randomised controlled trial (RCT), immunogenicity was assessed at various time points by the proportion of patients with antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralising antibodies (nAbs), using acid dissociation followed by electrochemiluminescence assay. Assay sensitivity was 50 ng/mL, and drug tolerance was ≥30 µg/mL (free drug) at the low positive control level.ResultsMinor differences in immunogenicity parameters (ADAs, ADA titres and nAbs) were evident between adalimumab-adbm and adalimumab RP across these three immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The proportion of ADA-positive and nAb-positive patients increased from baseline over time in all three RCTs, as expected, and was similar in the RA and CD RCTs but with higher numbers of ADA-positive and nAb-positive patients reported in the PsO trial. Subgroup analysis by patient sex showed the same trend.ConclusionsDifferences among the RCTs may partially be explained by concomitant background therapy (methotrexate) in the RA trial, stable doses of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine or methotrexate in 36% of patients with CD and absence of background therapy in the PsO RCT. The analyses further confirm the biosimilarity of adalimumab-adbm with the adalimumab RP across IMIDs and provide supporting evidence that adalimumab-adbm is an interchangeable biosimilar with consistent clinical results in patients originally treated with the RP.Trial registration numbersVOLTAIRE-RA (NCT02137226; EudraCT 2012-002945-40); VOLTAIRE-CD (NCT02871635; EudraCT 2016-000612-14); VOLTAIRE-PsO (NCT02850965; EudraCT 2016-000613-79).

Abstract CT244: HR001, a novel CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: primary results of a phase II study (HRAIN01-NHL01-II)

Abstract Background: HR001 is a CD19-targeted CAR-T cell for patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin's (R/R NHL). Here, we report the primary results of the phase 2 study (HRAIN01-NHL01-II). Methods: HRAIN01-NHL01-II is an open-label, single-arm, and multicenter (17 centers) study in China. It enrolled R/R NHL patients treated with at least two lines of therapy (must-have anthracycline and CD20-targeted agents) or after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All patients received a single infusion of HR001 at the 2.0 × 106 CAR+T cells/kg dose. The disease response was evaluated by the independent review committee with Lugano response criteria [2014]. Results: As of May 16th, 2023, 81 R/R NHL patients with ECOG 0-1 at baseline received the infusion HR001 from the Jinshan manufacturing facility [51.9% male; median age 53.4 years (range 23~74); 3.7% CD19 negative; 91.4% diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; 79.0% III-IV of Ann Arbor classification or Lugano] with a median follow-up of 160 days (range 7 to 454). The median time to best response was 30 days (range 28-358). The 3-month, 6 month and best objective response rate (ORR) was 53.1%(95% CI: 41.7-64.3), 45.7%(95% CI: 34.6-57.1) and 74.1% (95% CI: 63.1-83.2) respectively. The 3-month, 6 month and best complete response rate (CRR) was 32.1%(95% CI: 22.2-43.4), 29.6%(95% CI: 20.0-40.8) and 49.4%(95% CI: 38.1-60.7) respectively. Median duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 339 days (95% CI: 149-NE) and 176 days (95% CI: 91-NE) respectively. The overall survival (OS) was not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) happened in the hematologic system. The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 95.1% of patients, with ≥3 grade CRS observed in 3.7% of patients. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) happened in 8.6% of patients, without any ≥ 3 grade ICANS reported. The treatment-related mortality was 1.2%. The median time to CAR T-cell peak expansion was 240 hours (120~672) after infusion, median maximum expansion (Cmax) was 17413.9 copies/μg DNA (124.9~136382.2), and median AUC0-28d was 3201014.0 copies/μg DNA (205082.8~18400016.2). Positive tests for the anti-drug antibody (ADA) were noted in 14.8% of patients, while neutralizing antibody (Nab) tests were positive in 3.7% of patients. Among Nab-positive patients, the complete response was maintained until follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with R/R NHL could benefit from the HR001 treatment with satisfactory objective response, durable remission, and favorable safety profile. Citation Format: Yian Zhang, Yuhua Li, Kai Hu, Wuping Li, Hongwei Xue, Qi Deng, Zheng Ge, Liangquan Geng, Xianmin Song, Kang Yu, Hongmei Jing, Bing Chen, Xin Li, Zhimin Zhai, Jianping Shen, Jiang Cao, Qingming Wang, Peng Liu. HR001, a novel CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: primary results of a phase II study (HRAIN01-NHL01-II) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT244.

Neonatal Fc Receptor Inhibition Enables Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy Despite Pre-Existing Humoral Immunity.

Advances in adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy are transforming our ability to treat rare genetic disorders and address other unmet medical needs. However, the natural prevalence of anti-AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in humans currently limits the population who can benefit from AAV-based gene therapies. Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) plays an essential role in the long half-life of IgG, a key NAb. Researchers have developed several FcRn-inhibiting monoclonal antibodies to treat autoimmune diseases, as inhibiting the interaction between FcRn and IgG Fc can reduce circulating IgG levels to 20-30% of the baseline. We evaluated the utility of one such monoclonal antibody, M281, to reduce pre-existing NAb levels and to permit gene delivery to the liver and heart via systemic AAV gene therapy in mice and nonhuman primates. M281 successfully reduced NAb titers along with total IgG levels; it also enhanced gene delivery to the liver and other organs after intravenous administration of AAV in NAb-positive animals. These results indicate that mitigating pre-existing humoral immunity via disruption of the FcRn-IgG interaction may make AAV-based gene therapies effective in NAb-positive patients.

The complex relationship between antibody titers and clinical outcome in botulinum toxin type A long-term treated patients with cervical dystonia

BackgroundRepeated injections with abo- or onabotulinumtoxin type A (aboBoNT/A, onaBoNT/A) may lead to induction of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) and/or a secondary treatment failure (STF). The relation between NABs and STF is still unclear.Aim of the studyTo demonstrate that a significant improvement can be observed in patients with STF after abo- or onaBoNT/A-treatment when switched to incobotulinumtoxin type A (incoBoNT/A) and that in NAB-positive patients without STF abo- or onaBoNT/A-treatment can be continued without significant worsening.MethodsParalysis times (PT) of the mouse hemidiaphragm assay (MHDA) and clinical outcome (TSUI-score) was analyzed in 60 patients with cervical dystonia (CD) and STF after abo- or onaBoNT/A-treatment (STF-group) who were switched to incobotulinumtoxin type A (incoBoNT/A). These data were compared to those of 34 patients who were exclusively treated with incoBoNT/A (INCO-group). Furthermore, PTs and TSUI-scores were followed up over 7 years in 9 patients with NABs but without STF who were switched to inco-BoNT/A (SWI-group) and 9 other patients with NABs who remained on their previous BoNT/A preparation (NO-SWI-group).ResultsIn the STF-group, a significant improvement of TSUI-scores could be detected after switch to incoBoNT/A. This improvement was less pronounced than in the INCO-group. There was no significant difference in long-term outcome between the SWI- and NO-SWI-group.ConclusionThe best strategy is to avoid the induction of NABs. A switch to incoBoNT/A may lead to improvement in patients with STF. However, in some patients with NABs without STF, BoNT/A-treatment can be continued without significant worsening.

Higher Seroprevalence of Anti-Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Neutralizing Antibodies Among Racial Minorities in the United States.

Anti-adeno-associated viral vector (AAV) neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) can ablate efficacy of transgene expression following intravenous vector administration. This observation in both preclinical and clinical trials has led to exclusion of NAb-positive patients from receiving AAV gene therapy. AAV drug development includes selection of capsids with lower NAb seroprevalence that also possess other favorable traits. Often a limited number of healthy volunteers are screened to gauge NAb seroprevalence. However, limited data sets can be biased leading to inaccurate estimates of NAb incidence. In this study, we evaluated AAV NAbs against a panel of vectors among healthy donors within the United States. While the overall seroprevalence against most AAVs was lower, we did observe increased NAb incidence among black and Hispanic donors. These findings of increased NAb seroprevalence among the minority races were confirmed in a second set of donors who also demonstrated higher seroprevalence among these races. Interracial- and intraracial differences within genders were also observed among donors. The increased incidence of AAV NAb among racial minorities was unexpected. Our findings underscore the need for removing bias in sample data sets and evaluating seroprevalence within the patient population while selecting capsids.

Significant Long-Lasting Improvement after Switch to Incobotulinum Toxin in Cervical Dystonia Patients with Secondary Treatment Failure.

Under continuous long-term treatment with abo- or onabotulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A), ~10 to 15% of patients with cervical dystonia (CD) will develop neutralizing antibodies and reduced responsiveness over an ~10-year treatment period. Among the botulinum neurotoxin type A preparations so far licensed for CD, incobotulinum toxin A (incoBoNT/A; Xeomin®) is the only one without complex proteins. Whether CD patients with treatment failure under abo- or onaBoNT/A may still respond to incoBoNT/A is unknown. In this cross-sectional, retrospective study, 64 CD patients with secondary treatment failure after abo- or onaBoNT/A therapy who were switched to incoBoNT/A were compared to 34 CD patients exclusively treated with incoBoNT/A. The initial clinical severity of CD, best outcome during abo- or onaBoNT/A therapy, severity at the time of switching to incoBoNT/A and severity at recruitment, as well as all corresponding doses, were analyzed. Furthermore, the impact of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) on the long-term outcome of incoBoNT/A therapy was evaluated. Patients significantly improved after the switch to incoBoNT/A (p < 0.001) but did not reach the improvement level obtained before the development of partial secondary treatment failure or that of patients who were exclusively treated with incoBoNT/A. No difference between abo- and onaBoNT/A pretreatments or between the long-term outcomes of NAB-positive and NAB-negative patients was found. The present study demonstrates significant long-term improvement after a switch to incoBoNT/A in patients with preceding secondary treatment failure after abo- or onaBoNT/A therapy and confirms the low antigenicity of incoBoNT/A.

Effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in neutralizing antibody-positive patients previously treated with interferon-β

BackgroundSome patients with multiple sclerosis who are treated with interferon-β(IFNβ) develop neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), which reduce or abolish the therapeutic effects of the treatment. These patients are usually switched to a non-IFNβ treatment, such as glatiramer acetate (GA).It is unknown whether a patient's previous disease activity in combination with their NAb-status can provide further insights on their risk of future disease activity. Consequently, we investigated treatment outcomes in patients switching from IFNβ to GA according to NAb-status and clinical disease activity, while on IFNβ. MethodsWe identified all patients switching from IFNβ to GA and having information on NAb-status from the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry and compared treatment outcomes while on GA according to previous disease activity and the presence of NAbs. ResultsWe included 568 patients in the study: 107 NAb-negative patients switched due to adverse events (group 1), 24 NAb-negative patients switched with disease activity (group 2), 397 NAb-positive patients switched without disease activity (group 3) and 40 NAb-positive patients switched with disease activity (group 4).Compared to the reference (group 1), group 2 had an increased risk of future relapses (HR 1.79 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.00–3.19). Group 3 showed a trend of a lower risk of future relapses (HR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.53–1.04). Group 4 had, on average, a similar risk of future relapses (HR 1.15 95% CI: 0.69–1.92). Similarly, group 2 had a higher probability of treatment discontinuation due to disease activity compared to the other groups. ConclusionWhile on GA, patients switched from IFNβ in the context of disease activity and no NAbs had the highest risk of future disease activity, while NAb positive patients without previous activity had the lowest. We did not find any average difference between NAb-positive patients switching in a context of disease activity and NAb-negative patients switched due to adverse events, although carefulness in the interpretation of this result is advised.

Immunogenicity of Biosimilars for Rheumatic Diseases, Plaque Psoriasis, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review from Clinical Trials and Regulatory Documents.

The goal of this narrative review was to summarize immunogenicity data of biosimilars or biosimilar candidates for rheumatic diseases, plaque psoriasis, or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), available in peer-reviewed publications or regulatory documents. PubMed records and regulatory documents were searched for immunogenicity data of TNFα or CD20 inhibitor biosimilars or biosimilar candidates. Data collected included the proportion of patients positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs), proportion with neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) among ADAb-positive patients, ADAb/nAb assay characteristics, cross-reactivity, and the effects of ADAbs on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety. We identified eight biosimilars or biosimilar candidates for adalimumab (BI 695501, SB5, ABP 501, GP2017, PF-06410293, MSB-11022, FKB-327, ZRC-3197) four for etanercept (SB4, GP2015, CHS-0214, LBEC0101), and three each for infliximab (SB2, CT-P13, GP1111) and rituximab (CT-P10, GP2013, PF-05280586) with immunogenicity data. Randomized, head-to-head trials with reference products varied in design and methodology of ADAb/nAb detection. The lowest proportions of ADAb-positive (0–13%) and nAb-positive patients (0–3%) were observed in the trials of etanercept and its biosimilars, and the highest with adalimumab, infliximab, and their biosimilars (ADAbs: ≤ 64%; nAbs: ≤ 100%). The most common method of ADAb detection was electrochemiluminescence, and ADAb positivity was associated with nominally inferior efficacy and safety. Overall, there were no significant immunogenicity differences between biosimilars and reference products. However, there are many discrepancies in assessing and reporting clinical immunogenicity. In conclusion, immunogenicity data of biosimilars or biosimilar candidates for TNFα or CD20 inhibitors were collected in trials that varied in design and procedures for ADAb/nAb detection. In general, immunogenicity parameters of biosimilars are similar to those of their reference products.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-019-00394-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

High prevalence of neutralizing antibodies after long-term botulinum neurotoxin therapy.

To investigate the prevalence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) during long-term BoNT/A treatment in different neurologic indications. In this monocentric, observational cross-sectional study, 596 outpatients treated with BoNT/A for different indications were tested for BoNT/A binding antibodies by ELISA. Positive samples were investigated for NAbs with the mouse hemidiaphragm test. The prevalence of NAbs was analyzed for different indications: facial hemispasm, blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, other dystonia, and spasticity. Besides the rate of NAb-positive patients overall and per patient subgroup, a Kaplan-Meier analysis of the probability of remaining NAb negative with duration of treatment is provided, and a stepwise binary logistic regression analysis is performed to identify factors significantly contributing to the induction of NAbs. Overall, 83 of 596 patients (13.9%) had measurable NAbs. The probability of developing NAbs increased with the single and cumulative dose of treatment and was influenced by the BoNT/A formulation, while all other factors analyzed, including disease entity and treatment duration, had no additional influence. We present the largest study to date of the prevalence of BoNT/A NAbs in a large unbiased cohort of patients including the relevant neurologic indications. Repeated injections of BoNT/A inevitably bear the risk of developing NAbs. However, in addition to avoiding booster injections and providing short intervals between injections, reducing the individual injected doses may diminish the risk of NAb induction independently of the indication for which BoNT/A is used.

Serum Cotinine Does Not Predict Neutralizing Antibodies Against Interferon Beta in an Austrian MS Cohort.

Previous epidemiologic studies showed an increased risk of neutralizing antibody (NAb) development against Interferon beta in multiple sclerosis patients who smoke. Cotinine is an easily detectable metabolite of nicotine and, therefore, can be used as an objective surrogate marker for smoking status. We measured cotinine levels in NAb-positive and NAb-negative patients to find a potential association of nicotine consumption and NAb development. Cotinine was measured in 37 patients with known smoking status and in 123 patients with unknown smoking status, all of whom were routinely tested for NAb. Cotinine was detected by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, inhibition assay. We compared cotinine levels by NAb status and tested for the strength of association between cotinine and NAb status. We found a discrepancy between smoking status stated by patients and status defined by cotinine levels in 7 of 37 patients. In both cohorts, together with and without previously known smoking status (n = 160), we found 34% and 39% smokers, respectively, as defined by cotinine levels in NAb-negative and NAb-positive patients (P = 0.511). In our analysis, smoking was not associated with higher risk of NAb development. Moreover, smoking habits stated by patients do not always correlate with cotinine levels.

THE INFLUENCE OF NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES TO INTERFERON-BETA ON PROGRESSION OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Background: Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) affect the effectiveness of interferon therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis; however, this influence cannot be considered as unequivocal. NAbs formation is determined by several factors, such as frequency and duration of administration, interferon-β (IFN-β) formulation and the patient's genotype. It has been found that NAb titers vary over time. Aim: To assess the levels of NAbs to IFN-β in patients with multiple sclerosis and to investigate their relationship to disease progression. Materials and methods: We analyzed serum samples from 83 multiple sclerosis patients after a long-term IFN-β-1b treatment; NAbs detection reaction was performed by assessment of their cytopathic effect. Results: NAbs were found in 63.9% (53 of 83) of patients with dura???tion of IFN-β-1b treatment of 33.3±17.6 months. All NAb-positive patients were treated with high???dose IFN-β. Patients with titers>800 LU (n=28) demonstrated a trend towards more advanced neurologic deficit on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), compared to the patients with normal NAbs titers (0 to 20 LU, n=30) and intermediate titers (20 to 800 LU, n=25) (p>0.05). The exacerbation rate in the group with NAbs titers from 20 to 800 LU was insignificantly lower than that in the group with NAbs>800 and in the NAb-negative patients (p>0.05). Conclusion: Testing for NAbs may be a promising method for monitoring of IFN-β therapy in multiple sclerosis. There was a trend towards more pronounced neurological deficit in patients with high NAbs titers, but paradoxical data on a high rate of exacerbations in NAb-negative patients requires further study.

Socio-economic aspects of the testing for antibodies in MS-patients under interferon therapy in Austria: A cost of illness study

BackgroundAccording to EU-guidelines testing patients on interferon-beta (IFNb) for the presence of neutralising antibodies (NAb) is recommended; IFNb treatment efficacy of NAb-positive patients equals that of placebo-treated patients. Economic impact of NAb testing in MS patients has not been explored yet. The aim of this analysis is to estimate the impact of NAb testing in RRMS-patients on Austria׳s health-care-system. MethodsA decision-analytic model over 5 years was performed. The cost effectiveness of NAb testing versus no testing was evaluated. The model considers switching after relapse and withdrawal. All direct costs are based on Austrian data from 2013 and were discounted at 5% per year. The efficacy outcome measure was “relapse free”. Clinical data and resource use were determined by literature. ResultsTotal costs for all Austrian MS-patients on IFNb-therapy with testing amount to 187,554,021€ over 5 years; without testing is 175,091,300 €. Costs per relapse avoided over 5 years were 90,075€ in the NAb testing arm, and 99,535€ in the no NAb test arm, resulting in a difference of 9460€ in favour of routine NAb testing. Considering all 3590 IFNb-treated patients 2082 relapses can be avoided in the NAb testing arm versus 1759 in the no-testing arm within 5 years. Testing for NAb leads to costs per relapse avoided of 18,015€ per year versus 19,907€ when no tests are done. ConclusionThe results suggest that NAb testing reduces relapses and associated costs.

Importance of neutralizing antibody positivity in Tur-kish multiple sclerosis patients

The frequency and the consequences of binding and neutralizing antibodies (BAbs and NAbs) against Interferon beta (IFNbeta) in Turkish multiple sclerosis (MS) patients have not been determined yet, which could differ in such a country which is between Europa and Asia. The aim of the study is to assess the frequency of these antibodies, and to evaluate the impact of NAbs, from the clinical and radiologic aspects in Turkish patients with MS. One hundred and two MS patients were included. BAbs were screened using capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA), and NAbs were detected via Myxovirus protein A (MxA) messenger RNA (mRNA) induction assay (real-time polymerase chain reaction-PCR) at the beginning and one year later. Relapse rate and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were used to assess the clinical impact. Gadolinium enhanced lesions and T2 lesion volume were used as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters. Persistent NAb positivity defines to be positive both at first and then one year later. NAbs were detected in 12.2% (6/49) of IFNbeta-1b treated patients, and in 7.5% (3/40) of IFNbeta-1a SC treated patients, but none of the IFNbeta-1a IM treated patients had detectable NAbs. It was found that the mean relapse rate difference was significantly higher in persistent NAb negative patients (p = 0.024). Persistent NAb positivity had no effect on T2 lesion volume and contrast enhancing lesions. 60% of the persistent NAb positive patients had at least one relapse during one-year of follow-up. On the other hand, 32% of persistent NAb negative patients were detected to have at least one relapse. Data from this study suggest that patients may become unresponsive to IFNbeta therapy even when the frequency of NAbs does not prove to be as high as those in the literature. Nevertheless, one should keep in mind that disease activity is not always equal to NAb positivity.

Preserved in vivo response to interferon-alpha in multiple sclerosis patients with neutralising antibodies against interferon-beta (REPAIR study)

BackgroundA major problem in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with interferon-beta (IFN-β) is the development of neutralising antibodies (NAbs). High levels of NAbs block the induction of IFN-β-inducible markers, including Myxovirus Resistance Protein A (encoded by the MX1 gene), resulting in a loss of bioactivity and therapeutic benefit. ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study is to investigate the in vivo biological response to interferon-alpha (IFN-α) in MS patients, who have developed neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against IFN-β. Design/MethodsThe study was an open-label phase II study in 10 patients with relapsing-remitting MS with persisting NAbs against IFN-β and absent in vivo mRNA MxA response. We used in vivo induction of MX1 mRNA and other IFN-inducible genes as measure of the biological response. The primary endpoint was the in vivo mRNA MX1 response after an injection of IFN-α compared with the response after an injection of IFN-β. ResultsIn all 10 patients we found high MX1 expression after injection of IFN-α 6 MIU, indicating a preserved in vivo response to IFN-α. We measured the gene expression index of immune system genes in blood cells from the 10 NAb-positive patients after IFN-α treatment and 10 NAb-negative patients after injection of IFN-β. We found a significantly increased expression of a number of genes, including MX1, IFI27, IL10 and TNFSF10 (encoding TRAIL) in the NAb-positive patients treated with IFN-α. InterpretationIFN-α could be a therapeutic option in patients, who have lost the biological response to IFN-β because of NAbs against IFN-β. ClinicalTrials gov. Identifier: NCT01171209.

Development and specificities of anti-interferon neutralizing antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with pegylated interferon-α

Only limited data are available on the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAB) in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treated with pegylated interferon-α (PEG-IFN-α). The aim of this study was to evaluate the immunogenicity of PEG-IFN-α when administered to CHC patients who had or had not previously received standard IFN-α therapy. In addition, the specificities of NAB, together with the ability of leucocyte (LE) -IFN-α to re-establish therapeutic responsiveness in NAB-positive patients, were evaluated. NAB were assessed using a quantitative, standardized, virus-induced cytopathic effect assay. The seroconversion rate to PEG-IFN-α was higher in patients who had received previous standard IFN-α treatment than in those treated exclusively with PEG-IFN-α. Also, NAB produced during PEG-IFN-α therapy were unable to neutralize LE-IFN-α entirely, even though they can neutralize several IFN-α subtypes. In addition, the results indicate that a change to LE-IFN-α therapy can be associated with restoration of clinical responses in NAB-positive patients who had become resistant after showing an initial response to PEG-IFN-α treatment. This study emphasizes the importance of evaluating NAB development in CHC patients who become resistant to PEG-IFN-α treatment, and suggests management alternatives for patients who develop NAB.

Prevalence of anti-drug antibodies against interferon beta has decreased since routine analysis of neutralizing antibodies became clinical practice

Background: Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against interferon beta (IFNβ) lead to loss of treatment efficacy in multiple sclerosis patients. The seroprevalence of NAbs in multiple sclerosis patients treated with IFNβ during 2003–2004 was 32% in a cross-sectional analysis of routine data. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the seroprevalence of NAbs, the levels of NAb titres and the IFNβ preparations used for treatment of multiple sclerosis patients had changed in 2009–2010. Methods: This study included 1296 patients, analysed for NAbs with the myxovirus resistance protein A gene expression assay in 2009–2010. Results: The seroprevalence of NAbs had decreased to 19% in 2009–2010, which is significantly lower compared with the previous study in 2003–2004 (p<0.0001). This decrease was attributed to the IFNβ-1a preparations only, not to IFNβ-1b. The frequency of patients with high positive titres decreased the most, from 16% to 7% (p<0.0001). Conclusions: NAb seroprevalence has decreased since NAb monitoring became clinical practice in 2003, especially for patients with high NAb titres. This might be due to the stricter monitoring of NAb titres that prompt NAb positive patients to stop treatment, to preferential use of less immunogenic drugs and to alteration of drug formulations.

Immunogenic effects of recombinant interferon-beta therapy disrupt the JAK/STAT pathway in primary immune cells from patients with multiple sclerosis

Background: Immunogenicity of recombinant interferon-β (IFN-β) is a known complication in the therapy of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) that can interfere with efficacy are quantified using in vitro bioassays; however, these assays do not reveal the immunogenic state of the patient and are not predictive of treatment outcome. Objective: Assessment of the impact of NAbs on IFN-β responsive cells and signalling pathways in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with phospho-specific flow cytometry. Method: PBMCs from 10 IFN-β-treated patients with RRMS, two untreated patients, and two healthy controls were re-stimulated in autologous sera and media with a serial dilution of IFN-β (0–8000 U/ml) and levels of phosphorylation of STAT1/3/4/5/6 transcription factors were quantified in PBMC subtypes (NAb titres 0 to > 6000 neutralizing units). Data was subjected to principal component analysis, Hotelling’s T2, and partial least squares analysis. Results: Three significantly distinct clusters of individuals were revealed in autologous sera: therapy-naïve and healthy, treated NAb-negative, and treated NAb-positive. Compared with controls STATs signalling patterns were modulated in treated NAb-negative patients and inhibited in all treated NAb-positive patients independently of NAb titres. In media no clustering of patients could be found. The predictability of NAb titres based on the phospho-flow data was 74%. Conclusion: Phospho-specific flow cytometry can delineate subset-specific cell responses that can act as surrogates for NAb exposure in blood. Immunogenic effects alter the response in primary cells even at low NAb levels. Cell line-based immunogenicity testing is not readily transferable to the immunogenic response in patients.

Neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta-1b multiple sclerosis: a clinico-radiographic paradox in the BEYOND trial

Background: The frequency and impact of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) on clinical and radiographic outcomes is controversial. Objective: To assess NAb impact in the BEYOND study. Methods: 2244 patients were randomized (2:2:1) to receive IFNβ-1b, either 250 or 500 µg, or glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, and observed for 2–3.5 years. NAb titers were determined every 6 months. A titer ≥20 NU/ml was considered NAb positive. Efficacy was compared between NAb-positive and NAb-negative patients, using comprehensive statistical analyses, taking into account the delayed appearance of NAbs, the time-dependent changes in the relapse rate, spontaneous reversions to NAb-negative status, NAb-titer level, and also adjusting for baseline factors. Results: In the IFNβ-1b 250 µg group, NAb-positive titers were detected (≥ once) in 319 patients (37.0%); of these, 112 (35.1%) reverted to NAb-negative status. In the IFNβ-1b 500 µg group, 340 patients (40.7%) became NAb-positive and 119 (35.0%) reverted to NAb-negative status. In both IFNβ groups, especially the 250 µg arm, NAb-positive status was not associated with a convincing impact on any clinical outcome measure by any statistical analysis. By contrast, in both IFNβ groups, NAbs were associated with a very consistent deleterious impact on most MRI outcomes. Conclusion: There was a notable dissociation between the impact of NAbs on MRI and clinical outcomes. On MRI measures, the impact was consistent and convincing, whereas on clinical measures a negative impact of NAbs was not found. The basis for this clinico-radiographic paradox is unknown but it suggests that the relationship between NAbs and the therapeutic effects of IFNβ-1b is complex.

Interferon β-1b–neutralizing antibodies 5 years after clinically isolated syndrome

To determine the frequency and consequences of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with interferon β-1b (IFNβ-1b). In the Betaseron/Betaferon in Newly Emerging MS For Initial Treatment (BENEFIT) study, patients were randomly assigned to 250 μg IFNβ-1b (Betaferon) or placebo subcutaneously every other day for 2 years or until diagnosis of clinically definite MS (CDMS). Patients were then offered open-label IFNβ-1b for up to 5 years. NAb status was assessed every 6 months by the myxovirus protein A induction assay. A titer >20 NU/mL was considered NAb-positive, with low (≥20-100 NU/mL), medium (≥100-400 NU/mL), and high (≥400 NU/mL) titer categories. Here we examine early-treated patients, who received IFNβ-1b for up to 5 years. NAbs were measured in 277 of 292 early-treated patients and detected at least once in 88 (31.8%) patients, with 53 (60.2%) reverting to NAb negativity by year 5. Time to CDMS, time to confirmed disability progression, and annualized relapse rate did not differ between NAb-positive and NAb-negative patients or between periods of NAb positivity vs NAb negativity within patients. Increases in newly active lesion number and T2 lesion volume and conversion to McDonald MS were associated with NAb positivity and were more pronounced with higher titers. Although NAb positivity was associated with increased brain MRI activity, no discernible effects on clinical outcomes were found. This finding may reflect the greater power of MRI compared with clinical outcomes to detect the treatment effects of IFNβ-1b and may also result from temporal changes in NAb titers and biology.

Neopterin production and tryptophan degradation during 24-months therapy with interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis patients

BackgroundIncreased synthesis of neopterin and degradation of tryptophan to kynurenine, measured as kynurenine/tryptophan ratio (kyn/trp ratio), are considered in vitro markers of interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) activity. The aim of the study was to investigate the dynamic profile of neopterin and kyn/trp ratio in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) treated with two different doses of IFNβ-1a over a period of 24 months.MethodsRRMS patients (n = 101) received open-label IFNβ-1a 22 mcg (low dose, LD) or 44 mcg (high dose, HD) subcutaneously (sc), three times weekly for 24 months. Serum measurements of neopterin, kyn/trp ratio and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were obtained before treatment (i.e., at baseline) and 48 hours post-injection every 3 months thereafter. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and every 6 months. Changes in biomarkers over time were compared between LD- and HD-group as well as between patients with/without relapses and with/without NAbs using Analysis of Variance and Mann-Whitney tests.ResultsNeopterin (p < 0.001) and kyn/trp ratio (p = 0.0013) values increased over time vs baseline in both treatment groups. Neopterin values were higher (p = 0.046) in the HD-compared to the LD-group at every time point with the exclusion of months 21 and 24 of therapy. Conversely, there were no differences between the two doses groups in the kyn/trp ratio with the exclusion of month 6 of therapy (p < 0.05). Neopterin levels were significantly reduced in NAb-positive patients starting from month 9 of therapy (p < 0.05); the same result was observed for kyn/trp ratio but only at month 9 (p = 0.02). Clinical status did not significantly affect neopterin production and tryptophan degradation.ConclusionsAlthough differences in serum markers concentration were found following IFNβ administration the clinical relevance of these findings needs to be confirmed with more detailed studies.